276:- per Doc. I really don't think we'll be able to write a FA on this, or even a well-referenced neutral article. Seems more like a reflection of some SOAPboxy speeches than anything else. The ICC's insistence on cricket clips on YouTube being taken down just to protect their corporate partners, Sky (who never seem to mind anyway), is probably an instance of corporate censorship, but that doesn't mean the term itself has any encyclopedic relevance. Viable concept does not really imply valid article, IMO.
48:
without prejudice to relisting. This article is now in radically different state than it was when it was first nominated. If anyone still wishes to see this deleted, and I find that highly unlikely, then a new debate is needed as the bulk of the comments are referring to a completely different
133:
Absolute drivel from beginning to end, in as much as it has any content at all. I speedied it as nonsense, but it was restored, so here you have it: two examples, one is (guess what) the AACS encryption key meme, the other is to an article on a speech by Milton in 1644 whihc makes no mention
493:
for now, which has a small section on corporate censorship. There should eventually be a separate article, but currently there isn't enough material to warrant one. As for the timing, the article was created in
December 2005, so obviously has nothing to do with the AACS nonsense.
234:
makers refusing to (pay to) advertise on radio or TV stations who published that statement about sugar and poliomyelitis. Corporate censorship is possible, if someone "speaks out of turn" and says something that endangers some big commercial firm's profits.
60:
386:
477:
A terrible dictionary definition. I think it probably would be possible to write a good article on this topic, but I agree with those who say we lose nothing by deleting this one.
288:. Fully legitimate topic. Concept is not a neologism but a descriptive term. May be short but can be improved. Feel that accusations of policy violations are exaggerated.
126:
373:
I tend to doubt that the eventualist make-a-substub-and-let-random-anons-push-their-povs method will work for this subject, even without the recent
99:
94:
103:
86:
59:
Relisted. I find this close bizarre. My deletion rationale still stands - an expanded dicdef will be an OR POV essay, which this is. See
222:
I once read about a time about the middle of the 20th century when a doctor in the USA said that he had evidence that eating too much
17:
444:
without prejudice. Right now it's a good entry for
Wiktionary, but not an encyclopedia. Perhaps an article does exist somewhere,
409:
543:
193:
401:, as dictionary definition. There is, I suppose, hope for expansion, but we lose nothing by deleting this, and I'd rather
589:
36:
574:
562:
547:
522:
510:
498:
481:
469:
452:
436:
416:
393:
368:
336:
324:
292:
280:
268:
256:
239:
217:
199:
172:
159:
67:
53:
146:, Knowledge (XXG) is the top hit for the term, etc. etc. Crap on many levels, needs killing, kill it now please.
382:
186:
90:
588:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
252:
345:
289:
236:
248:
265:
64:
82:
74:
374:
465:
300:, borderline speedy, per lack of content other than external links and a paraphrase of the title.
539:
333:
301:
405:
an article that isn't a dicdef than keep this around because we can speculate one could exist.
143:
519:
390:
212:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
429:
208:
135:
449:
406:
169:
139:
559:
478:
461:
50:
535:
495:
433:
277:
227:
181:
154:
148:
425:
570:- rewrite by Uncle G is vastly improved, definition version has been transwikied.
332:. I see a none-too-subtle attempt to push a POV about the dreaded 09f9 key, here.
120:
571:
531:
507:
490:
168:. Unsourced. Devoid of any meaningful content. Links are largely irrelevant.
387:
Motion
Picture Association of America film rating system#Effects of ratings
344:. Nothing in the article to show how the term is notable, DICDEF per Doc.
377:
plague; however, a viable, neutral, well-referenced article certainly
264:
att he moment it is a dicdef, any expansion will be an original essay-
142:, grossly POV term, blatant POV-pushing in timing and prime example,
134:
whatsoever of the concept. One source: an anti-corporate tract. So
518:
Unlikely to ever be more than the dictionary definition it is now
231:
223:
582:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
448:, but losing this stub isn't going to hold back the project. --
61:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Corporate censorship (2)
432:
this but as a disputed speedy I suppose I'd best not. --
116:
112:
108:
381:
be written, perhaps assembled from subarticles like
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
460:. No claim of notability, dictionary definition.
592:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
180:per Corporate censor, sorry I mean
24:
247:and expand. Viable concept. --
1:
424:per all the above (including
230:, and that that resulted in
226:makes it likelier to catch
609:
428:). I'm so very tempted to
383:Pruneyard Shopping Center
585:Please do not modify it.
575:00:23, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
68:08:43, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
54:01:49, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
563:21:19, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
548:17:43, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
523:17:26, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
511:17:19, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
499:17:14, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
482:17:00, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
470:15:56, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
453:15:21, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
437:15:13, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
417:13:53, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
394:13:45, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
369:13:41, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
337:13:17, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
325:13:16, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
293:13:03, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
281:13:01, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
269:12:53, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
257:12:49, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
240:12:48, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
218:12:20, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
200:12:17, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
173:12:16, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
160:12:10, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
558:— unexpandible dicdef
188:One Night In Hackney
83:Corporate censorship
75:Corporate censorship
528:Delete and redirect
290:Christopher Connor
255:
237:Anthony Appleyard
158:
600:
587:
414:
365:
363:
361:
359:
357:
321:
319:
317:
315:
313:
251:
215:
198:
189:
152:
124:
106:
34:
608:
607:
603:
602:
601:
599:
598:
597:
596:
590:deletion review
583:
410:
355:
353:
351:
349:
347:
311:
309:
307:
305:
303:
213:
197:
187:
185:
97:
81:
78:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
606:
604:
595:
594:
578:
577:
565:
550:
525:
513:
501:
484:
472:
455:
439:
419:
396:
371:
339:
327:
295:
283:
271:
259:
249:badlydrawnjeff
242:
220:
202:
191:
175:
131:
130:
77:
72:
71:
70:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
605:
593:
591:
586:
580:
579:
576:
573:
569:
566:
564:
561:
557:
555:
551:
549:
545:
541:
537:
533:
529:
526:
524:
521:
517:
514:
512:
509:
505:
502:
500:
497:
492:
488:
485:
483:
480:
476:
473:
471:
467:
463:
459:
456:
454:
451:
447:
443:
440:
438:
435:
431:
427:
423:
420:
418:
415:
413:
408:
404:
400:
397:
395:
392:
388:
384:
380:
376:
372:
370:
367:
366:
343:
340:
338:
335:
334:Sam Blacketer
331:
328:
326:
323:
322:
299:
296:
294:
291:
287:
284:
282:
279:
275:
272:
270:
267:
263:
260:
258:
254:
250:
246:
243:
241:
238:
233:
229:
228:poliomyelitis
225:
221:
219:
216:
210:
206:
203:
201:
196:
195:
190:
183:
179:
176:
174:
171:
167:
164:
163:
162:
161:
156:
151:
150:
145:
141:
137:
128:
122:
118:
114:
110:
105:
101:
96:
92:
88:
84:
80:
79:
76:
73:
69:
66:
62:
58:
57:
56:
55:
52:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
584:
581:
567:
553:
552:
527:
520:Tom Harrison
515:
503:
486:
474:
457:
445:
441:
426:User:Cryptic
421:
411:
402:
398:
378:
346:
341:
329:
302:
297:
285:
273:
261:
244:
204:
192:
177:
165:
147:
132:
45:
43:
31:
28:
462:--Akhilleus
446:in potentia
46:SPEEDY KEEP
560:➥the Epopt
532:censorship
491:censorship
450:InkSplotch
49:article.
479:Propaniac
51:RFerreira
536:CComMack
496:Delirium
487:Redirect
434:kingboyk
278:Moreschi
214:Charlene
207:. Fails
144:WP:UNDUE
127:View log
430:WP:SNOW
391:Cryptic
375:keyspam
100:protect
95:history
572:Addhoc
556:Delete
554:Censor
516:Delete
504:Delete
475:Delete
458:Delete
442:Delete
422:Delete
399:Delete
342:Delete
330:Delete
298:Delete
274:Delete
262:Delete
209:WP:ATT
205:Delete
178:Delete
166:Delete
136:WP:NEO
104:delete
508:MONGO
412:juice
407:Mango
379:could
304:: -->
232:candy
224:sugar
155:Help!
140:WP:OR
121:views
113:watch
109:links
16:<
568:Keep
534:. —
506:nn--
466:talk
385:and
320:<
286:Keep
253:talk
245:Keep
211:. --
170:andy
117:logs
91:talk
87:edit
530:to
489:to
403:see
389:. —
266:Doc
194:303
182:Guy
149:Guy
125:– (
65:Doc
546:)
494:--
468:)
364:te
362:ai
360:hw
358:et
356:tl
354:os
350:an
348:Ry
184:.
138:,
119:|
115:|
111:|
107:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
63:--
544:c
542:–
540:t
538:(
464:(
352:P
318:t
316:n
314:a
312:i
310:d
308:a
306:R
157:)
153:(
129:)
123:)
85:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.