291:, though the quality of those discussions is abysmal. The article is a blatant advertisement and manual primarily written by the software's author that Knowledge (XXG) has been abused into hosting for three and a half years now, waiting for it to "establish notability". As amply (and proudly!) evidenced by the software's official site itself, it has not. No third-party sources are presented to establish notability, almost certainly because none exist; googling finds nothing better than a handful of mentions on blogs.
333:
None of these Delete votes appear to come from individuals with the technical knowledge to speak on this subject. So far these Delete votes seem opinion rather than fact based. This article can be improved to meet
Knowledge (XXG)'s standards, why not use your apparent Knowledge (XXG) expertise to
213:, it may be more notable than presumed by these comments. It is also impossible to predict whether any topic will "establish notability . . . anytime soon". That's more of an opinion than fact. The previous deletion discussion can be found
284:
164:
136:
143:
Does not establish its notability, and a quick Google search doesn't suggest that it will anytime soon. Also seems to serve only to advertise the framework. —
295:
this framework has become notable an article would be appropriate. That time is not now, and we've given it more than enough leniency in the meantime. —
288:
214:
66:
246:
341:
17:
238:
224:
369:
be improved to meet
Knowledge (XXG)'s standards, and our Knowledge (XXG) expertise cannot be applied. If we were to apply our
428:
36:
103:
98:
427:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
107:
61:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
345:
337:
242:
228:
220:
401:
175:
90:
189:
321:
268:
197:
146:
49:
56:
53:
377:, which is explicitly forbidden; no one else would be able to determine whether the article was
210:
94:
413:
390:
349:
325:
304:
272:
232:
201:
179:
153:
72:
171:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
409:
386:
317:
300:
264:
86:
78:
144:
374:
359:
378:
362:
356:
124:
405:
382:
313:
296:
404:, which further supports the idea that this is essentially an advertisement.--
400:. I ran across this article because of a completely inappropriate link from
258:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
421:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
131:
120:
116:
112:
285:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/AJILE/2006-07-13
48:. When notability is uncertain at this moment, then
263:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
431:). No further edits should be made to this page.
165:list of Software-related deletion discussions
8:
289:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/AJILE
188:Doesnt seem to be of any note whatsoever.
159:
163:: This debate has been included in the
52:states that we cannot keep the article.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
381:without duplicating that research. —
24:
283:. This was previously on afd at
334:improve rather than delete it?
1:
448:
365:, the article in fact can
414:16:38, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
391:13:38, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
373:expertise, that would be
350:11:18, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
326:15:13, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
305:14:11, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
233:00:08, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
73:23:38, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
424:Please do not modify it.
273:00:00, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
202:23:51, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
180:23:25, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
154:22:31, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
402:Unobtrusive JavaScript
247:few or no other edits
249:outside this topic.
209:Per comments on its
44:The result was
375:original research
340:comment added by
275:
250:
223:comment added by
200:
182:
168:
151:
439:
426:
352:
262:
260:
236:
235:
196:
195:
169:
150:
147:
134:
128:
110:
69:
64:
59:
34:
447:
446:
442:
441:
440:
438:
437:
436:
435:
429:deletion review
422:
335:
256:
218:
193:
148:
130:
101:
85:
82:
67:
62:
57:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
445:
443:
434:
433:
417:
416:
395:
394:
393:
328:
307:
277:
276:
261:
253:
252:
251:
204:
183:
141:
140:
81:
76:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
444:
432:
430:
425:
419:
418:
415:
411:
407:
403:
399:
396:
392:
388:
384:
380:
376:
372:
368:
364:
361:
358:
354:
353:
351:
347:
343:
339:
332:
329:
327:
323:
319:
315:
311:
308:
306:
302:
298:
294:
290:
286:
282:
279:
278:
274:
270:
266:
259:
255:
254:
248:
244:
240:
234:
230:
226:
222:
216:
212:
208:
205:
203:
199:
191:
187:
184:
181:
177:
173:
166:
162:
158:
157:
156:
155:
152:
145:
138:
133:
126:
122:
118:
114:
109:
105:
100:
96:
92:
88:
84:
83:
80:
77:
75:
74:
70:
65:
60:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
423:
420:
397:
370:
366:
342:32.141.58.29
330:
309:
292:
280:
257:
206:
190:WP:NOTMANUAL
185:
172:TexasAndroid
160:
142:
45:
43:
31:
28:
357:third-party
336:—Preceding
318:Niteshift36
314:User:Korath
312:again. per
265:Ron Ritzman
245:) has made
239:98.14.44.58
225:98.14.44.58
219:—Preceding
194:neon white
50:WP:CRYSTAL
371:technical
211:talk page
360:reliable
355:Without
338:unsigned
221:unsigned
137:View log
363:sources
104:protect
99:history
54:King of
406:Inonit
398:Delete
383:Korath
310:Delete
297:Korath
281:Delete
186:Delete
132:delete
108:delete
46:delete
379:valid
293:After
149:Error
135:) – (
125:views
117:watch
113:links
87:Ajile
79:Ajile
16:<
410:talk
387:Talk
346:talk
331:Keep
322:talk
301:Talk
287:and
269:talk
243:talk
229:talk
215:here
207:Keep
198:talk
192:. --
176:talk
161:Note
121:logs
95:talk
91:edit
367:not
217:.
170:--
412:)
389:)
348:)
324:)
316:.
303:)
271:)
237:—
231:)
178:)
167:.
123:|
119:|
115:|
111:|
106:|
102:|
97:|
93:|
71:♠
408:(
385:(
344:(
320:(
299:(
267:(
241:(
227:(
174:(
139:)
129:(
127:)
89:(
68:♣
63:♦
58:♥
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.