304:
It is different because of article size and amount of Afd's? Not much real difference here in terms of topics. The only real difference I can see bewteen the two is one is accuses a country the other accuses a religion. Somehow it is OK to accuse a country of apartheid but not a
385:
As I said in the other discussion, "Israeli apartheid" gets over 210,000 ghits; it is a widely used term in discussions of
Israeli treatment of Arab populations. Whether you agree with the comparison with South Africa or not, there are definitely people using the term.
122:
108:
115:
102:
97:
92:
87:
82:
77:
339:
is entirely one-sided (despite the fig-leaf inclusion of "allegations" in its name). And yes, I think the fact that this article has already survived five nominations is relevant: how many bites at the apple are appropriate? —
322:
It's not a question of whether it's "OK" to accuse a country or a religion of apartheid. I think the question is whether there's enough "meat" to warrant its continued existence as a separate article. Looking at
418:. If you don't like the way things are going at the Islam deletion, bring it up over there (that includes Deletion Review if you ever cross that bridge). I'd say you could nominate this article per precedent
72:
478:
of this nomination. As it is, the article has merit, and my understadning is that one is not supposed to argue along the basis of whether or not other articles ought to be deleted. --
335:, I don't see enough information to justify two articles. Another difference, as I wrote, is that this article is balanced — roughly half of it rebuts the apartheid allegations — while
446:
Which of the criteria for deletion is being alleged to apply here? Sefringle appears to have some form, as I see last month he proposed deletion of "Zionism and RAcism allegations"
151:
146:
155:
138:
178:
216:
245:
530:
510:
498:
482:
462:
450:
438:
426:
406:
390:
377:
353:
317:
293:
263:
234:
205:
55:
142:
276:
is roughly one-fifth the size of this article, it doesn't present the range of views that this article does, and it hasn't already survived
349:
289:
193:. It is very POV pushing to delete that article, but not delete this article as well, so I am putting this article up for deletion
190:
134:
61:
17:
336:
324:
273:
186:
545:
36:
544:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
345:
285:
341:
281:
435:
272:
I disagree with your assertion that the two articles are analogous; I think they're quite different.
459:
306:
252:
223:
194:
524:
49:
479:
423:
332:
328:
387:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
374:
520:
491:
447:
415:
399:
370:
48:, obviously unanimous that this should be cleaned up and not deleted. Non-admin closure.
507:
172:
495:
403:
123:
Articles for deletion/Allegations of
Israeli apartheid (second nomination)
109:
Articles for deletion/Allegations of
Israeli apartheid (Fourth nomination)
490:- We've been through this five times already. Requesting another AfD is
116:
Articles for deletion/Allegations of
Israeli apartheid (fifth nomination)
103:
Articles for deletion/Allegations of
Israeli apartheid (8th nomination)
98:
Articles for deletion/Allegations of
Israeli apartheid (7th nomination)
93:
Articles for deletion/Allegations of
Israeli apartheid (6th nomination)
88:
Articles for deletion/Allegations of
Israeli apartheid (5th nomination)
83:
Articles for deletion/Allegations of
Israeli apartheid (4th nomination)
78:
Articles for deletion/Allegations of
Israeli apartheid (2nd nomination)
538:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
471:
398:- appears to be a notable term, and this appears to be a
168:
164:
160:
73:
Articles for deletion/Allegations of Israeli apartheid
333:
Criticism of Islam#Discrimination against non-Muslims
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
548:). No further edits should be made to this page.
329:Criticism of Islam#Discrimination against women
8:
422:the other one gets deleted, if it does.
414:- Pretty much a dictionary violation of
244:: This debate has been included in the
215:: This debate has been included in the
70:
7:
68:
24:
217:list of Judaism-related deletions
246:list of Israel-related deletions
187:Allegations of Islamic apartheid
135:Allegations of Israeli apartheid
62:Allegations of Israeli apartheid
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
565:
531:19:51, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
511:19:43, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
499:16:33, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
483:14:34, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
463:13:07, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
451:12:56, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
439:06:51, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
427:05:41, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
407:05:33, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
391:05:17, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
378:05:10, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
354:05:13, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
318:04:55, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
294:04:47, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
264:04:15, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
235:04:15, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
206:04:12, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
56:19:51, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
541:Please do not modify it.
280:deletion nominations. —
32:Please do not modify it.
474:, I would question the
189:is now up for deletion
67:AfDs for this article:
506:Fuck you bastards --
458:-per Malik Shabazz
434:- Bad nomination.
400:pointy nomination
337:Islamic apartheid
325:Islamic apartheid
274:Islamic apartheid
266:
249:
237:
220:
556:
543:
527:
526:Ten Pound Hammer
315:
312:
309:
261:
258:
255:
250:
240:
232:
229:
226:
221:
211:
203:
200:
197:
176:
158:
52:
51:Ten Pound Hammer
34:
564:
563:
559:
558:
557:
555:
554:
553:
552:
546:deletion review
539:
525:
313:
310:
307:
259:
256:
253:
230:
227:
224:
201:
198:
195:
149:
133:
130:
128:
125:
118:
111:
65:
50:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
562:
560:
551:
550:
535:
534:
533:
514:
513:
501:
485:
480:Simon Cursitor
465:
453:
441:
429:
409:
393:
380:
369:Appears to be
363:
362:
361:
360:
359:
358:
357:
356:
297:
296:
267:
238:
183:
182:
129:
127:
126:
121:
119:
114:
112:
107:
105:
100:
95:
90:
85:
80:
75:
69:
66:
64:
59:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
561:
549:
547:
542:
536:
532:
528:
522:
518:
517:
516:
515:
512:
509:
505:
502:
500:
497:
493:
489:
486:
484:
481:
477:
473:
469:
466:
464:
461:
457:
454:
452:
449:
445:
442:
440:
437:
433:
430:
428:
425:
421:
417:
413:
410:
408:
405:
401:
397:
394:
392:
389:
384:
381:
379:
376:
372:
368:
365:
364:
355:
351:
347:
343:
342:Malik Shabazz
338:
334:
330:
326:
321:
320:
319:
316:
303:
302:
301:
300:
299:
298:
295:
291:
287:
283:
282:Malik Shabazz
279:
275:
271:
268:
265:
262:
247:
243:
239:
236:
233:
218:
214:
210:
209:
208:
207:
204:
192:
188:
180:
174:
170:
166:
162:
157:
153:
148:
144:
140:
136:
132:
131:
124:
120:
117:
113:
110:
106:
104:
101:
99:
96:
94:
91:
89:
86:
84:
81:
79:
76:
74:
71:
63:
60:
58:
57:
53:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
540:
537:
521:uncalled for
503:
487:
475:
467:
455:
443:
431:
419:
411:
395:
388:Brianyoumans
382:
366:
277:
269:
241:
212:
185:The article
184:
45:
43:
31:
28:
488:Speedy Keep
412:Speedy keep
375:Morgan Wick
367:Speedy keep
305:religion?--
270:Strong keep
46:Speedy keep
496:John Nagle
476:bone fides
470:-- Were I
448:Zoomatters
436:The Behnam
519:That was
460:ChrisLamb
373:pushing.
508:Java7837
492:WP:POINT
416:WP:POINT
371:WP:POINT
350:contribs
290:contribs
179:View log
152:protect
147:history
504:Delete
472:bolder
424:Shalom
331:, and
156:delete
420:after
404:Haemo
402:. --
173:views
165:watch
161:links
16:<
494:. --
468:Keep
456:Keep
444:Keep
432:Keep
396:Keep
383:Keep
346:Talk
286:Talk
278:five
242:Note
213:Note
191:here
169:logs
143:talk
139:edit
529:•
314:gle
311:rin
308:Sef
260:gle
257:rin
254:Sef
251:--
248:.
231:gle
228:rin
225:Sef
222:--
219:.
202:gle
199:rin
196:Sef
177:– (
54:•
523:.
352:)
348:|
327:,
292:)
288:|
171:|
167:|
163:|
159:|
154:|
150:|
145:|
141:|
344:(
284:(
181:)
175:)
137:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.