681:, to quote its Wiki article. That article is something that stands despite its publisher, rather than because of it. At best such articles represent theft from the authors, at worst they allow stuff which would not survive peer review to get an undue imprimatur. Doesnt it strike you as odd that all the sourcing for this is bad?
318:
It sounds like the main concern here is notability. Although the majority of the sources are
Chinese state-run publications, there is one instance of a prominent Western publication, Popular Mechanics, being referenced. That source's presence alone is enough, at minimum, to prevent this article from
389:
authored by an
Australian university professor who claims to have visited China and seen this new transportation system in person. The best case scenario for you at this point is that no consensus will be reached, in which case the article stays just as it would if the result becomes "keep". Please
678:
Scientific
Research Publishing (SCIRP) is an academic publisher of presumably peer-reviewed open-access electronic journals, conference proceedings, and scientific anthologies of questionable quality. Although it has an address in southern California, in reality it is a "Chinese
347:
Follow-up: I see that in the previous AfD discussion from two years ago linked above (the result of which was "keep"), I also participated and gave a very similar reason for keeping it as my reason in this discussion. I will bring up the additional point that, per WP:Notability,
52:. Noting that the nominator has given the opinion that sourcing may be somewhat thinner in this article than desired and of poorer quality, I still see a consensus at this time to keep the article based on notability grounds raised by those in favour of retaining the article.
476:
Being informed of a discussion with neutral language is not canvassing. Using that argument is the equivalent of throwing rocks because you have no bullets left. There are five "keeps" now in this discussion compared to your one "delete". You've lost; make peace with it.
675:
Again, a source, even if an overlapping source (with other issues.) Note that both are centered not on this system, but on Newman’s concept of “trackless tram”; this is not necessarily evidence for a separate article. Notice also that it is sourced to SCIRP
91:
298:
This has nothing to do with anything you mention here. The project is not “courageous”, it does not matter where it was made, or where it might be used. It’s a blip, and one based on COI sources. It is worth a footnote, not an article.
406:
That is, in fact, the first piece of sourcing since the article was created that might justify a stand-alone article. The idea that a regurgitated press release in PM might is ludicrous; there are can-openers that meet that standard.
232:
86:
226:
588:
192:
263:
This article has never really progressed beyond a glorified press release. Has the idea itself progressed beyond a demonstration? Qwirkle (talk) 13:43, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
158:
153:
185:
162:
280:
Even, if this concept is not perceived to be the answer to the United States' traffic jams, there is no need to erase this courageous project from history. Please
145:
541:
nom fails to tell us which policy or guideline this article meets for inclusion and . The sources in the article still take it over the minimum threshold for
617:
132:
117:
390:
determine very carefully before you make your next reply whether it's going to be a valuable use of our time and your time to continue this discussion.
791:
762:
733:
711:
690:
666:
638:
609:
579:
557:
509:
486:
416:
399:
377:
361:
342:
328:
308:
293:
272:
70:
352:. I suggest that any prior AfD discussions be researched before a new one is made, as this is pretty much a DOA rehash of the previous discussion.
247:
214:
149:
464:
770:- I don;t know if my vote is really necessary at this point, but yeah. It's notable with good sources in and out of the U.S. ---
208:
112:
105:
17:
786:
552:
368:
Next, note that bare notability, assuming this meets that for arguments sake, does not in itself justify a separate article.
204:
141:
76:
753:) there is a prominent Western publication, being referenced. That source's presence alone is enough for notability. -
126:
122:
254:
384:
808:
40:
64:
289:
220:
662:
804:
750:
458:
36:
366:
Do you see any independent sourcing, not based on press releases on this, in the article or elsewhere?
349:
758:
707:
240:
59:
782:
634:
605:
285:
284:, because the English language Knowledge should also address topics outside of mainstream USA. --
729:
686:
658:
575:
505:
412:
373:
338:
304:
268:
101:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
803:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
746:
650:
478:
468:
454:
391:
353:
320:
754:
703:
54:
773:
722:
predatory open access publisher of using email spam to solicit papers for submission.
621:
592:
546:
542:
725:
682:
571:
501:
408:
369:
334:
300:
264:
179:
654:
649:. As well as the sources already identified there is plenty of coverage in
92:
Articles for deletion/Autonomous Rail Rapid
Transit (2nd nomination)
799:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
702:
on basis of sources and what is mentioned by Phil
Bridger.
494:
The
Autonomous Rail Rapid Transit is now running in circles
467:): you mention participating in a previous AfD. Were you
720:
So, based on company press releases, and a piece from a
497:
175:
171:
167:
500:) strikes you as a neutral invitation to an AfD? Heh.
471:
to that by the article’s creator as well, as you were
239:
589:
87:
Articles for deletion/Autonomous Rail Rapid
Transit
570:did not meet policies for inclusion, of course.
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
811:). No further edits should be made to this page.
616:Note: This discussion has been included in the
587:Note: This discussion has been included in the
319:being deleted or merged with another article.
253:
8:
133:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
618:list of China-related deletion discussions
615:
586:
333:Nonsense. Everything in PM isn’t notable.
383:I added one new published reference from
84:
721:
677:
493:
7:
83:
24:
118:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
142:Autonomous Rail Rapid Transit
77:Autonomous Rail Rapid Transit
350:notability is not temporary
108:(AfD)? Read these primers!
828:
792:02:56, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
763:20:46, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
734:14:32, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
712:11:24, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
691:14:26, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
667:10:55, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
639:04:32, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
610:04:32, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
580:20:36, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
558:18:56, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
510:09:53, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
487:02:29, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
417:04:28, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
400:02:16, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
378:20:36, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
362:18:19, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
343:18:13, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
329:18:06, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
309:17:30, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
294:17:21, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
273:16:56, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
71:03:21, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
801:Please do not modify it.
566:..that would because it
32:Please do not modify it.
655:10.4236/jtts.2019.91003
82:AfDs for this article:
106:Articles for deletion
55:(non-admin closure)
790:
778:
641:
612:
123:Guide to deletion
113:How to contribute
57:
819:
780:
776:
772:
629:
627:
600:
598:
484:
481:
473:
472:
397:
394:
386:The Conversation
359:
356:
326:
323:
258:
257:
243:
195:
183:
165:
103:
69:
67:
62:
53:
34:
827:
826:
822:
821:
820:
818:
817:
816:
815:
809:deletion review
774:
625:
624:
596:
595:
556:
482:
479:
395:
392:
357:
354:
324:
321:
200:
191:
156:
140:
137:
100:
97:
80:
65:
60:
58:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
825:
823:
814:
813:
795:
794:
765:
739:
738:
737:
736:
715:
714:
696:
695:
694:
693:
670:
669:
643:
642:
613:
584:
583:
582:
561:
560:
550:
535:
534:
533:
532:
531:
530:
529:
528:
527:
526:
525:
524:
523:
522:
521:
520:
519:
518:
517:
516:
515:
514:
513:
512:
434:
433:
432:
431:
430:
429:
428:
427:
426:
425:
424:
423:
422:
421:
420:
419:
313:
312:
311:
261:
260:
197:
136:
135:
130:
120:
115:
98:
96:
95:
94:
89:
81:
79:
74:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
824:
812:
810:
806:
802:
797:
796:
793:
788:
784:
779:
777:
769:
766:
764:
760:
756:
752:
748:
744:
741:
740:
735:
731:
727:
723:
719:
718:
717:
716:
713:
709:
705:
701:
698:
697:
692:
688:
684:
680:
674:
673:
672:
671:
668:
664:
660:
656:
652:
648:
645:
644:
640:
636:
632:
631:
630:
619:
614:
611:
607:
603:
602:
601:
590:
585:
581:
577:
573:
569:
565:
564:
563:
562:
559:
554:
548:
544:
540:
537:
536:
511:
507:
503:
499:
495:
492:
491:
490:
489:
488:
485:
475:
474:
470:
466:
463:
460:
456:
452:
451:
450:
449:
448:
447:
446:
445:
444:
443:
442:
441:
440:
439:
438:
437:
436:
435:
418:
414:
410:
405:
404:
403:
402:
401:
398:
388:
387:
382:
381:
380:
379:
375:
371:
365:
364:
363:
360:
351:
346:
345:
344:
340:
336:
332:
331:
330:
327:
317:
314:
310:
306:
302:
297:
296:
295:
291:
287:
286:NearEMPTiness
283:
279:
278:
277:
276:
275:
274:
270:
266:
256:
252:
249:
246:
242:
238:
234:
231:
228:
225:
222:
219:
216:
213:
210:
206:
203:
202:Find sources:
198:
194:
190:
187:
181:
177:
173:
169:
164:
160:
155:
151:
147:
143:
139:
138:
134:
131:
128:
124:
121:
119:
116:
114:
111:
110:
109:
107:
102:
93:
90:
88:
85:
78:
75:
73:
72:
68:
63:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
800:
798:
771:
767:
742:
699:
659:Phil Bridger
646:
623:
622:
594:
593:
567:
538:
461:
385:
367:
315:
281:
262:
250:
244:
236:
229:
223:
217:
211:
201:
188:
99:
49:
47:
31:
28:
747:Jackdude101
679:operation".
455:Jackdude101
227:free images
805:talk page
755:MA Javadi
704:Bookscale
469:canvassed
37:talk page
807:or in a
787:contribs
775:GingeBro
724:. Kewl.
547:McMatter
480:Jackdude
465:contribs
393:Jackdude
355:Jackdude
322:Jackdude
186:View log
127:glossary
39:or in a
726:Qwirkle
683:Qwirkle
572:Qwirkle
553:contrib
502:Qwirkle
409:Qwirkle
370:Qwirkle
335:Qwirkle
301:Qwirkle
265:Qwirkle
233:WPÂ refs
221:scholar
159:protect
154:history
104:New to
66:Crossin
628:Thomas
599:Thomas
543:WP:GNG
205:Google
163:delete
61:Steven
496:(see
248:JSTOR
209:books
193:Stats
180:views
172:watch
168:links
16:<
783:talk
768:Keep
759:talk
751:talk
745:Per
743:Keep
730:talk
708:talk
700:Keep
687:talk
663:talk
647:Keep
635:talk
606:talk
576:talk
568:does
539:Keep
506:talk
498:here
459:talk
453:PS,
413:talk
374:talk
339:talk
316:Keep
305:talk
290:talk
282:keep
269:talk
241:FENS
215:news
176:logs
150:talk
146:edit
50:keep
651:doi
483:101
396:101
358:101
325:101
255:TWL
184:– (
789:)
785:•
761:)
732:)
710:)
689:)
665:)
657:.
637:)
620:.
608:)
591:.
578:)
545:.
508:)
415:)
376:)
341:)
307:)
292:)
271:)
235:)
178:|
174:|
170:|
166:|
161:|
157:|
152:|
148:|
781:(
757:(
749:(
728:(
706:(
685:(
676:-
661:(
653::
633:(
626:C
604:(
597:C
574:(
555:)
551:(
549:/
504:(
462:·
457:(
411:(
372:(
337:(
303:(
288:(
267:(
259:)
251:·
245:·
237:·
230:·
224:·
218:·
212:·
207:(
199:(
196:)
189:·
182:)
144:(
129:)
125:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.