647:. This is confusing for me because, as I said, I thought I had seen it—I am probably mistaking it for something else, though I honestly thought I had seen it as a TV movie. I'll keep digging for a bit and see if there's anything else out there on it, and then I'll update my vote if necessary. Thanks again,
613:, casting announcements for an unaired TV pilot are not enough to show notability for an article. (Generally, TV show notability is shown by a mix of articles on production, critical reviews, and sometimes analysis of themes or characters.) So, personally, I am more at "redirect" or "delete". --
245:, unaired TV pilots are generally not notable enough for standalone articles. This article consists of nothing but casting notices (and the one "Fox passes on pilot" article) which, on their own, do not demonstrate notability. Instead, article should be deleted and replaced with a redirect to
584:, could you please clarify your position for me, because I saw on the article's "Talk" page that you said the article should be "merged"? Here, however, you seem to be opting for a "delete" or a "redirect". If you could clear this up for me, I'd appreciate it. Thanks,
417:
So is consensus at the talk page, if the redirect is controversial or reverted. And why? Is there something in the page history that needs to be removed? If not, I cannot see any good reason for 'delete & redirect' rather than just 'redirect'.
210:
327:
No cult notability, no airing after pilot season, and outside a couple of known names to sell the series, everyone else remains a cast of unknowns. Nothing here to keep outside a one-sentence line about it in
298:
559:
air, as a TV movie. In fact, I thought I saw it! I've only just seen this nomination now, but would like to look into it and perhaps work on the article. There seem to be sufficient sources to pass
204:
163:
136:
131:
140:
272:
123:
170:
436:
as nominator has admitted to deliberately misusing AfD. I would not necessarily be opposed to a redirect without deletion if discussed at the proper venue, however.
95:
598:
Honestly, any of "merge", "redirect" or "delete" is fine by me. Personally, I don't think the casting info for an unaired pilot – and to be clear, this did
110:
225:
609:
that have been released, but they are unrelated to this TV pilot) – is important enough to "merge", but I understand if others disagree. But as per
454:, with no basis in fact, as usual. (Note: This editor has a history of him assuming bad faith on my part – more can be found at my talk page...) --
192:
127:
386:. And since that seems to be what the nominator is proposing, I'm unclear why this was brought to AFD at all and not just boldly redirected?
534:. While notability is not sufficient for a stand-alone article, the sources are fine and content is more in-depth than the merge target. –
186:
656:
628:
593:
572:
538:
515:
491:
469:
445:
424:
412:
392:
374:
356:
316:
290:
264:
119:
71:
65:
90:
83:
17:
182:
606:
531:
383:
246:
53:
232:
329:
104:
100:
619:
506:
460:
403:
307:
281:
255:
679:
40:
198:
487:
441:
397:
Because AfD decisions are binding. Also, I'm at "delete, and then redirect", rather than just "redirect". --
497:
451:
675:
36:
483:
437:
347:
218:
61:
610:
242:
563:
at the very least, so "Keeping" or "Draftifying" for the moment doesn't seem too big an issue.
79:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
674:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
652:
623:
589:
568:
510:
464:
407:
311:
285:
259:
560:
365:
335:
57:
496:
Which shows nothing of a "deliberate misuse" of AfD. So, no – assuming bad faith, and
535:
479:
419:
387:
157:
648:
644:
614:
585:
581:
564:
501:
475:
455:
398:
302:
276:
250:
56:. This leaves open the possibility of a merge if someone is so inclined.
478:: No aspersions here. I'm simply referring to your discussion with
670:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
602:
ever air anywhere AFAICT, certainly not in the U.S. (there are
299:
list of United States of
America-related deletion discussions
450:
What are you babbling about? I see you're bad faith casting
555:: I was under the impression that "Behind Enemy Lines"
153:
149:
145:
217:
231:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
682:). No further edits should be made to this page.
532:Behind Enemy Lines (film series)#Cancelled pilot
384:Behind Enemy Lines (film series)#Cancelled pilot
297:Note: This discussion has been included in the
271:Note: This discussion has been included in the
247:Behind Enemy Lines (film series)#Cancelled pilot
54:Behind Enemy Lines (film series)#Cancelled pilot
273:list of Television-related deletion discussions
249:which is how the subject should be handled. --
8:
111:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
296:
270:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
120:Behind Enemy Lines (2017 TV pilot)
72:Behind Enemy Lines (2017 TV pilot)
24:
96:Introduction to deletion process
1:
657:14:15, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
629:13:19, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
594:08:28, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
573:08:18, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
539:09:01, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
516:16:14, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
492:08:19, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
470:23:23, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
446:20:47, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
425:08:26, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
413:15:16, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
393:15:01, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
375:14:41, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
357:14:32, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
317:13:48, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
291:13:48, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
265:13:48, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
66:02:14, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
86:(AfD)? Read these primers!
699:
530:the production section to
672:Please do not modify it.
364:. Redirect to the film.
32:Please do not modify it.
643:Thanks for clarifying,
578:Question for Nominator
330:the 2001 film article
84:Articles for deletion
482:immediately above.
604:Behind Enemy Lines
627:
514:
468:
411:
354:
319:
315:
293:
289:
263:
101:Guide to deletion
91:How to contribute
690:
617:
504:
458:
401:
355:
350:
344:
343:
338:
305:
279:
253:
236:
235:
221:
173:
161:
143:
81:
34:
698:
697:
693:
692:
691:
689:
688:
687:
686:
680:deletion review
348:
341:
336:
333:
178:
169:
134:
118:
115:
78:
75:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
696:
694:
685:
684:
666:
665:
664:
663:
662:
661:
660:
659:
634:
633:
632:
631:
607:"sequel" films
575:
525:
524:
523:
522:
521:
520:
519:
518:
484:Modernponderer
438:Modernponderer
431:
430:
429:
428:
427:
377:
359:
321:
320:
294:
239:
238:
175:
114:
113:
108:
98:
93:
76:
74:
69:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
695:
683:
681:
677:
673:
668:
667:
658:
654:
650:
646:
642:
641:
640:
639:
638:
637:
636:
635:
630:
625:
621:
616:
612:
608:
605:
601:
597:
596:
595:
591:
587:
583:
579:
576:
574:
570:
566:
562:
558:
554:
550:
546:
543:
542:
541:
540:
537:
533:
529:
517:
512:
508:
503:
499:
498:WP:ASPERSIONS
495:
494:
493:
489:
485:
481:
480:User:Hugsyrup
477:
473:
472:
471:
466:
462:
457:
453:
452:WP:ASPERSIONS
449:
448:
447:
443:
439:
435:
432:
426:
423:
422:
416:
415:
414:
409:
405:
400:
396:
395:
394:
391:
390:
385:
381:
378:
376:
372:
371:
370:
363:
360:
358:
353:
351:
340:
339:
331:
326:
323:
322:
318:
313:
309:
304:
300:
295:
292:
287:
283:
278:
274:
269:
268:
267:
266:
261:
257:
252:
248:
244:
234:
230:
227:
224:
220:
216:
212:
209:
206:
203:
200:
197:
194:
191:
188:
184:
181:
180:Find sources:
176:
172:
168:
165:
159:
155:
151:
147:
142:
138:
133:
129:
125:
121:
117:
116:
112:
109:
106:
102:
99:
97:
94:
92:
89:
88:
87:
85:
80:
73:
70:
68:
67:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
671:
669:
603:
599:
577:
556:
552:
548:
544:
527:
526:
500:, indeed. --
434:Speedy close
433:
420:
388:
379:
368:
366:
361:
345:
334:
324:
240:
228:
222:
214:
207:
201:
195:
189:
179:
166:
77:
49:
47:
31:
28:
476:User:IJBall
205:free images
676:talk page
611:WP:TVSHOW
243:WP:TVSHOW
58:Barkeep49
37:talk page
678:or in a
620:contribs
549:Draftify
536:sgeureka
507:contribs
461:contribs
404:contribs
380:Redirect
369:Мандичка
308:contribs
282:contribs
256:contribs
164:View log
105:glossary
50:redirect
39:or in a
349:chatter
241:As per
211:WP refs
199:scholar
137:protect
132:history
82:New to
649:Dflaw4
645:IJBall
615:IJBall
586:Dflaw4
582:IJBall
580:: Hi,
565:Dflaw4
561:WP:GNG
502:IJBall
456:IJBall
399:IJBall
362:Delete
325:Delete
303:IJBall
277:IJBall
251:IJBall
183:Google
141:delete
553:Merge
528:Merge
226:JSTOR
187:books
171:Stats
158:views
150:watch
146:links
16:<
653:talk
624:talk
590:talk
569:talk
545:Keep
511:talk
488:talk
465:talk
442:talk
408:talk
337:Nate
312:talk
301:. --
286:talk
275:. --
260:talk
219:FENS
193:news
154:logs
128:talk
124:edit
62:talk
600:not
557:did
551:or
547:or
421:Hug
389:Hug
382:to
373:😜
233:TWL
162:– (
52:to
655:)
622:•
592:)
571:)
509:•
490:)
463:•
444:)
406:•
332:.
310:•
284:•
258:•
213:)
156:|
152:|
148:|
144:|
139:|
135:|
130:|
126:|
64:)
651:(
626:)
618:(
588:(
567:(
513:)
505:(
486:(
474:@
467:)
459:(
440:(
410:)
402:(
367:—
352:)
346:(
342:•
314:)
306:(
288:)
280:(
262:)
254:(
237:)
229:·
223:·
215:·
208:·
202:·
196:·
190:·
185:(
177:(
174:)
167:·
160:)
122:(
107:)
103:(
60:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.