558:
people that loves his work, you can see that from the comments on his social accounts, I am just one of them who came across that and putting it on
Knowledge. That's all, I avoided using biased words in the article. So I don't see what I am doing wrong here. As this is not paid editing or COI. Tomorrow I may decide to edit on another person that I like the work of, does that mean it is disruptive editing? To delete a page based on the behaviour of the person who created the page isn't the right, you should concentrate on looking at the sources, his work, and the awards he's won from his work, these are not seo spam and pr.
690:
language sources for the COVID-19 film could help argue for a keep, but it's a weak one. If there were more coverage as a whole it would be a lot easier. My thought here is that if this closes as delete, which looks likely, this could redirect to the Help article until more sourcing becomes available.
689:
I did help clean it up, but that's not entirely a justification to keep or delete. I do think that there's more of an argument for notability now than there was when I nominated it for deletion back in 2016, however the main argument for notability is the 2021 film Help. It looks like the
Spanish
557:
Please stop attacking me and the way I edit, but instead defend if the subject is notable or not. There is no violation on
Knowledge by editing and creating articles for one person alone. It is also not a violation by asking about the page being patrolled, this is all speculative. Blake has many
750:
as per above - "Spanish language sources for the COVID-19 film could help argue for a keep", as well as his feature film Help (2021) which has now been decoded as a Keep. These are all reliable sources. You are attacking on the individual who contributing to the article more than its notability
474:. Further research on social media shows that he "Has a large fan base or a significant "cult" following, while I understand large followers on social accounts isn't reliable source, but you only have to quickly scroll his feed and see the interactions. As per
637:
For the person who makes the final decision to keep or delete, please observe those that said Delete only mentioned not notable, and was not able to defend each source specifically, his notable film(s) specifically, or his prolific awards from his films.
353:
Subject lacks evidence of notability in credible sources. Creator of this page and a major contributor appear to be largely focused on creating content on this director and his films, suggesting a conflict of interest
213:
536:
apply? There's one source talks about his work on his feature film, and another source talk about his short film
Coronavirus, then another talks about another of his short film The English Teacher.
671:
645:
543:
493:
244:
PR-spam. The sources don't really cover him in depth enough to warrant an article, and laughably, the GQ source doesn't even spell his name right which makes me question their general reliability.
81:
258:
421:, Filmdaily is almost certainly an unreliable source. It looks like they accept "native advertising, guest posts, sponsored content and partnerships", and the site is also on Prax's SEO list.
278:
174:
470:
It's clear from the cited sources on the page that this person has had significant roles in films as an actor as we as filmmaker, including his recent notable feature film
301:
A mistake of incorrectly spelled name should not define its reliability. There are plenty of other sources that heavily discusses him and his work such as the one from
207:
333:
76:
121:
106:
441:
isn't reliable enough, as it is dedicated to talk about one of his films and it goes on further talk about his other work and his background.
675:
649:
547:
497:
147:
142:
760:
745:
704:
679:
653:
628:
606:
577:
551:
524:
501:
460:
430:
413:
380:
363:
342:
323:
290:
270:
250:
151:
101:
94:
61:
17:
228:
573:
475:
456:
319:
134:
195:
115:
111:
779:
697:
478:, he is also "Has made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment." Looking at his
40:
189:
185:
775:
409:
36:
138:
741:
691:
667:
661:
641:
561:
539:
489:
444:
307:
235:
520:
426:
376:
359:
286:
266:
221:
752:
565:
448:
311:
130:
67:
733:
615:
756:
593:
569:
452:
389:
315:
90:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
774:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
717:
471:
418:
405:
401:
57:
737:
533:
512:
245:
201:
483:
623:
516:
422:
372:
355:
337:
282:
262:
438:
729:
721:
619:
589:
728:
sourcing. Desperation to get this article indexed and kept makes me suspicious for
725:
600:
168:
482:
with several videos in millions views and comments, several which have received
397:
393:
53:
302:
515:
would probably apply. The now-deleted references look like PR/SEO spam.
479:
770:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
511:, sources aren't really significant coverage, and even it was,
259:
list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions
371:
Very little left after we remove the fluff. Non-notable.
164:
160:
156:
622:
so there is no criteria-based reason for keeping this
220:
439:
https://www.matichon.co.th/prachachuen/news_2444802
279:
list of United
Kingdom-related deletion discussions
82:
Articles for deletion/Blake Ridder (2nd nomination)
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
782:). No further edits should be made to this page.
332:Note: This discussion has been included in the
277:Note: This discussion has been included in the
257:Note: This discussion has been included in the
660:this page was also edited by an administrator
234:
8:
122:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
665:
639:
537:
487:
400:however this is not enough to satisfy the
334:list of China-related deletion discussions
331:
276:
256:
672:2A01:4B00:880F:B200:F42C:99AE:7D01:2873
646:2A01:4B00:880F:B200:6917:16F2:FA25:D1FB
588:- nowhere near enough evidence to pass
544:2A01:4B00:880F:B200:F42C:99AE:7D01:2873
494:2A01:4B00:880F:B200:7DEF:ED85:CBD4:7B71
74:
7:
437:I don't understand why this source
394:this fully dedicated to the subject
596:but no reason to keep at present.
77:Articles for deletion/Blake Ridder
24:
107:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
734:Knowledge is not for promotion
1:
761:20:28, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
746:09:12, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
62:10:17, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
730:covert conflicts of interest
705:04:04, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
680:03:41, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
654:02:27, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
629:18:50, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
607:18:25, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
578:13:22, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
552:03:54, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
525:23:45, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
502:21:19, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
461:20:12, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
431:23:40, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
414:17:10, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
381:16:24, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
364:15:30, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
343:15:07, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
324:14:25, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
291:14:17, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
271:14:17, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
251:14:12, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
396:and a review from the same
97:(AfD)? Read these primers!
799:
736:of non-notable people. --
772:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
476:entertainers notability
73:AfDs for this article:
695:(formerly Tokyogirl79)
664:without any issues.
95:Articles for deletion
724:, with decidedly
696:
682:
670:comment added by
656:
644:comment added by
564:comment added by
554:
542:comment added by
504:
492:comment added by
447:comment added by
345:
310:comment added by
293:
273:
112:Guide to deletion
102:How to contribute
790:
701:
694:
626:
614:- meets neither
605:
580:
463:
340:
326:
248:
239:
238:
224:
172:
154:
92:
34:
798:
797:
793:
792:
791:
789:
788:
787:
786:
780:deletion review
699:
692:ReaderofthePack
662:ReaderofthePack
624:
597:
559:
480:youtube channel
442:
392:. I have found
338:
305:
246:
181:
145:
129:
126:
89:
86:
71:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
796:
794:
785:
784:
766:
765:
764:
763:
710:
709:
708:
707:
684:
683:
658:
631:
609:
582:
581:
555:
527:
506:
464:
435:
434:
433:
383:
366:
347:
346:
328:
327:
295:
294:
274:
242:
241:
178:
125:
124:
119:
109:
104:
87:
85:
84:
79:
72:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
795:
783:
781:
777:
773:
768:
767:
762:
758:
754:
749:
748:
747:
743:
739:
735:
731:
727:
723:
719:
715:
712:
711:
706:
703:
702:
693:
688:
687:
686:
685:
681:
677:
673:
669:
663:
659:
657:
655:
651:
647:
643:
636:
632:
630:
627:
621:
617:
613:
610:
608:
604:
603:
602:
595:
591:
587:
584:
583:
579:
575:
571:
567:
563:
556:
553:
549:
545:
541:
535:
531:
528:
526:
522:
518:
514:
510:
507:
505:
503:
499:
495:
491:
485:
481:
477:
473:
469:
465:
462:
458:
454:
450:
446:
440:
436:
432:
428:
424:
420:
417:
416:
415:
411:
407:
403:
399:
395:
391:
387:
384:
382:
378:
374:
370:
367:
365:
361:
357:
352:
349:
348:
344:
341:
335:
330:
329:
325:
321:
317:
313:
309:
304:
300:
297:
296:
292:
288:
284:
280:
275:
272:
268:
264:
260:
255:
254:
253:
252:
249:
237:
233:
230:
227:
223:
219:
215:
212:
209:
206:
203:
200:
197:
194:
191:
187:
184:
183:Find sources:
179:
176:
170:
166:
162:
158:
153:
149:
144:
140:
136:
132:
128:
127:
123:
120:
117:
113:
110:
108:
105:
103:
100:
99:
98:
96:
91:
83:
80:
78:
75:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
771:
769:
713:
698:
666:— Preceding
640:— Preceding
634:
633:
611:
599:
598:
585:
560:— Preceding
538:— Preceding
529:
508:
488:— Preceding
467:
466:
443:— Preceding
385:
368:
350:
306:— Preceding
298:
243:
231:
225:
217:
210:
204:
198:
192:
182:
131:Blake Ridder
88:
68:Blake Ridder
49:
47:
31:
28:
616:WP:CREATIVE
532:, How does
472:Help (2021)
419:Less Unless
406:Less Unless
247:CUPIDICAEđź’•
208:free images
738:Jack Frost
726:unreliable
594:WP:TOOSOON
390:WP:TOOSOON
776:talk page
751:defence.
718:WP:NACTOR
625:Spiderone
517:Perryprog
423:Perryprog
402:WP:SIGCOV
373:Oaktree b
356:Dexxtrall
339:Spiderone
283:Shellwood
263:Shellwood
37:talk page
778:or in a
716:- Fails
668:unsigned
642:unsigned
592:. Maybe
574:contribs
562:unsigned
540:unsigned
534:WP:BLP1E
513:WP:BLP1E
490:unsigned
457:contribs
445:unsigned
320:contribs
308:unsigned
303:Matichon
175:View log
116:glossary
39:or in a
753:Brslxyl
700:(｡◕‿◕｡)
601:Velella
566:Brslxyl
449:Brslxyl
312:Brslxyl
214:WPÂ refs
202:scholar
148:protect
143:history
93:New to
722:WP:GNG
714:Delete
620:WP:GNG
612:Delete
590:WP:GNG
586:Delete
509:Delete
484:awards
398:source
386:Delete
369:Delete
351:Delete
186:Google
152:delete
54:Daniel
50:delete
530:Reply
229:JSTOR
190:books
169:views
161:watch
157:links
16:<
757:talk
742:talk
720:and
676:talk
650:talk
635:Keep
618:nor
570:talk
548:talk
521:talk
498:talk
468:Keep
453:talk
427:talk
410:talk
388:per
377:talk
360:talk
316:talk
299:Keep
287:talk
267:talk
222:FENS
196:news
165:logs
139:talk
135:edit
58:talk
486:.
236:TWL
173:– (
759:)
744:)
732:.
678:)
652:)
576:)
572:•
550:)
523:)
500:)
459:)
455:•
429:)
412:)
404:.
379:)
362:)
336:.
322:)
318:•
289:)
281:.
269:)
261:.
216:)
167:|
163:|
159:|
155:|
150:|
146:|
141:|
137:|
60:)
52:.
755:(
740:(
674:(
648:(
568:(
546:(
519:(
496:(
451:(
425:(
408:(
375:(
358:(
314:(
285:(
265:(
240:)
232:·
226:·
218:·
211:·
205:·
199:·
193:·
188:(
180:(
177:)
171:)
133:(
118:)
114:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.