810:. Took a couple off the list due to lack of sourcing or whether it actually made sense to inclde on this list. Some of these pages clearly do not have sufficient sourcing to qualify for a standalone page, but others certainly do (Heal & AmWell for example). This could use some polishing up, particularly in the way it's been sectioned out. And there are likely to be others taht would be qualified to be added to this list. Probably makes sense to defer deletion until we decide on the merge. --
354:(this is a review but it's from a reliable source so I believe it still meets WP:RS). On top of that, there are almost 2000 results when searching for articles covering the organization. The sourcing is there to meet WP:NCORP, it may just need some help from other editors to better convey notability in how it's written. Keep and tag as a stub. --
314:, "A company, corporation, organization, group, product, or service is notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject." Based on that, this startup meets the primary criteria listed at WP:NCORP with at least the following sources:
510:
being considered". I'm not sure what bit of the quote I extracted from ORGIND is difficult to understand. ORGIND weeds out *all* material that hasn't clearly been provided by a source unaffiliated to the subject. Everything ... interviews, announcements, press releases, profile pages, financial reports, etc.
789:
That's a great idea, and I'm happy to start drafting that together. I'd suggest when we get to Closer, we might want to relist this, and potentially the others that have been nominated for deletion as well, as we figure out if they aggregate page, hopefully with sufficient material to be noteworthy,
509:
section: "Note that in addition to providing criteria for establishing notability, some SNGs also add additional restrictions on what types of coverage can be considered for notability purposes. For example, the SNG for companies and organizations specifies a very strict set of criteria for sources
56:
article could be appropriate encyclopedic coverage of not only Doxy.me but some other similar companies. As editors interested in those other articles were not notified of this discussion, it would not be appropriate to close this as a merge. However, should consensus, whether BOLDLY or through a
907:
Insights Care wants to make everyone including
Doctors, Healthcare Executives, Healthcare Companies, Institutes, Patients, Medical Students to be an integral part of our journey to witness fascinating changes on a daily basis due to increased technological intervention and other structural
790:
will be approved, but if we delete the pages first, that will create a bunch of additional work to find the citations and content, so I can judge what is appropriate. My goal is to get the draft telehealth page done in the next two days, and then I will post the link here.
421:
Knowledge is not a platform for promotion, nor a Yellow Pages. I've provided an analysis of some sources above. The criteria for establishing notability for companies/organizations as per WP:NCORP is for multiple sources (at least two) of
472:
as well in case I was missing something, and I'm not seeing any examples there that support the claim above. I'm not saying that interpretation is incorrect, but I haven't been able to verify this myself within the guidelines.
57:
formal Merge discussion, be reached to create that article, please feel free to reach out to me as I would be happy to restore this article as a redirect so that content (and attribution) may be merged into that new article.
699:
I'm going to work on both cleaning up this one, if there are any other sources, and also see what I can do to clean up those, as I agree this is too important an area not to have the best sourced information possible.
203:
392:
319:
164:
807:
290:
678:
637:- Of the 6 non-primary sources on the page, 2 are broken links (Refs 3 & 10), 1 is an interview (Ref 6), and 2 won't load for me (Refs 7 & 9). Leaving only
273:
197:
627:
a press release? And not to engage in whataboutism here, but it looks like by these standards there’s a lot of spam articles already existing within this arena:
438:. None of the references in the article meet the criteria and having searched I am unable to locate any references that meet the criteria. Topic fails GNG/
256:
111:
624:
388:
96:
436:
original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject
315:
884:
346:. I was also able to find the following sources which appear to satisfy the criteria above but have not been included in the article:
623:
Understood. My interpretation of these was clearly different, but I can see that most of the sourcing is weak. As a side note, is
347:
91:
84:
17:
647:- About the same as above, most of the 11 sources on the page are either primary, interviews, press release, or behind paywall
53:
375:, you've incorrectly interpreted "independent of the subject" to mean "independent of the subject" by solely focussing on
880:
781:
Interesting proposition but none of them are rich in academic content, its all company info. And who would do the work?
456:
I understand where the editor above is coming from and I appreciate the thoroughness. It sounds like we've interpreted
218:
137:
132:
105:
101:
403:
provides no information whatsoever on *the company* (the topic of this article) so I'm not sure why you included it.
185:
830:
717:
141:
638:
959:
464:
appears to mainly weed out anything that's essentially just a rewrite of material published by a primary source (
40:
52:. There is consensus that this company is not notable. There were some level of consensus that perhaps a merged
124:
888:
934:
815:
795:
705:
478:
359:
179:
955:
460:
differently, so I've reviewed again and my interpretation still leads me to believe these sources pass.
376:
335:
36:
396:
323:
662:
175:
867:
844:
593:
584:
576:
561:] Forbes reference by a contributor. Forbes is deprecated meaning is not a reliable source. Non-RS.
543:
427:
343:
211:
62:
938:
924:
892:
871:
848:
819:
799:
772:
739:
709:
656:
614:
516:
482:
448:
409:
363:
299:
282:
265:
248:
66:
225:
930:
811:
791:
733:
701:
474:
372:
355:
80:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
954:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
644:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
917:
902:
767:
634:
607:
597:
554:
494:
461:
457:
431:
423:
400:
384:
331:
327:
241:
498:
439:
380:
311:
235:
434:. "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include
911:
863:
840:
601:
566:
547:
539:
294:
277:
260:
58:
754:
684:
511:
506:
469:
443:
404:
191:
727:
339:
128:
158:
855:
758:
502:
693:- Company profiles, press release, churnalism, and articles based on interviews
465:
493:
The quote I posted above about "Independent
Content" is taken directly from
806:
Took longer than anticipated with the election distraction. I put together
351:
862:
it with other similar articles, using the current draft as the main body.
750:
690:
501:
which is the relevant guideline for companies/organizations. Our policy
674:
387:) for "Independent Content". So of the references you've listed above,
120:
72:
879:
I added another source to the page that covers the company in detail,
687:- All acceptable sourcing is only focused on the $ 160 million raised
668:
650:
665:- Sourcing here is better but I'd like to review this one a bit more
399:
relies entirely on information provided by the founder and finally,
659:- 7 sources on the page, not one appears to meet the criteria above
592:
The coverage is what you find for a small private company. Fails
950:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
833:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
757:
into a single article on the telemedicine service providers.
720:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
653:- This has 3 sources, one of which I had added previously.
395:
likewise is entirely based on an interview with the COO,
154:
150:
146:
210:
726:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
671:- First pass of refs appear to be based on interviews
839:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
962:). No further edits should be made to this page.
542:. It is a dependent source. An interview. Fails
289:Note: This discussion has been included in the
272:Note: This discussion has been included in the
255:Note: This discussion has been included in the
749:, generally, this and comparable articles like
391:relies entirely on an interview with the CEO,
291:list of Companies-related deletion discussions
379:but you've omitted the requirement listed in
274:list of Medicine-related deletion discussions
224:
8:
112:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
929:Agreed. I removed this from the article. --
288:
271:
254:
565:] A small profile page in reviews. Fails
257:list of Utah-related deletion discussions
430:and (this bit is important!) containing
681:is the only one I could actually access
906:
858:actually provided a great idea. Let’s
428:in-depth information *on the company*
7:
583:] A simple profile listing. Fails
24:
97:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
571:I cant see this one in the UK.
530:They don't. Lets examine them.
54:Telemedicine service providers
1:
939:20:10, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
925:20:33, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
893:20:27, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
625:this Business Insider article
397:this from Health Care IT News
67:00:25, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
872:12:28, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
849:08:56, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
820:21:29, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
800:20:00, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
773:17:47, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
740:15:51, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
710:13:51, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
615:07:57, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
517:18:56, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
483:00:46, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
449:17:15, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
410:17:15, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
364:01:23, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
300:11:44, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
283:11:44, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
266:11:44, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
249:11:32, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
497:(which is a section within
234:Non-notable startup. Fails
87:(AfD)? Read these primers!
979:
389:this from Business Insider
808:a draft of this list here
553:] A press-release. Fails
505:explicitly states in the
952:Please do not modify it.
575:] Simple listing. Fails
32:Please do not modify it.
901:It specifically fails
905:. It is puff piece.
432:"Independent Content"
393:this from dereret.com
330:. These all meet: 1)
85:Articles for deletion
424:significant coverage
401:this from Tech Radar
334:, 2) multiple, 3)
851:
742:
383:(specifically at
302:
285:
268:
102:Guide to deletion
92:How to contribute
970:
922:
920:
838:
836:
834:
765:
725:
723:
721:
612:
610:
297:
280:
263:
246:
244:
229:
228:
214:
162:
144:
82:
34:
978:
977:
973:
972:
971:
969:
968:
967:
966:
960:deletion review
918:
916:
852:
829:
827:
759:
743:
716:
714:
608:
606:
468:). I dove into
310:: According to
295:
278:
261:
242:
240:
171:
135:
119:
116:
79:
76:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
976:
974:
965:
964:
946:
945:
944:
943:
942:
941:
896:
895:
885:136.33.173.131
874:
837:
826:
825:
824:
823:
822:
803:
802:
783:
782:
776:
775:
724:
713:
697:
696:
695:
694:
688:
682:
672:
666:
663:Heal (company)
660:
654:
648:
642:
629:
628:
590:
589:
588:
587:
580:
572:
569:
562:
558:
550:
532:
531:
524:
523:
522:
521:
520:
519:
486:
485:
451:
415:
414:
413:
412:
377:WP:INDEPENDENT
367:
366:
336:WP:INDEPENDENT
304:
303:
286:
269:
232:
231:
168:
115:
114:
109:
99:
94:
77:
75:
70:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
975:
963:
961:
957:
953:
948:
947:
940:
936:
932:
928:
927:
926:
923:
921:
913:
909:
904:
900:
899:
898:
897:
894:
890:
886:
882:
878:
875:
873:
869:
865:
861:
857:
854:
853:
850:
846:
842:
835:
832:
821:
817:
813:
809:
805:
804:
801:
797:
793:
788:
785:
784:
780:
779:
778:
777:
774:
771:
770:
766:
764:
763:
756:
755:Mercy Virtual
752:
748:
745:
744:
741:
737:
736:
731:
730:
722:
719:
712:
711:
707:
703:
692:
689:
686:
685:Clover Health
683:
680:
676:
673:
670:
667:
664:
661:
658:
655:
652:
649:
646:
643:
640:
636:
633:
632:
631:
630:
626:
622:
619:
618:
617:
616:
613:
611:
603:
599:
595:
586:
582:
581:
578:
574:
573:
570:
568:
564:
563:
560:
559:
556:
552:
551:
549:
545:
541:
537:
536:
535:
534:
533:
529:
526:
525:
518:
515:
514:
508:
504:
500:
496:
492:
491:
490:
489:
488:
487:
484:
480:
476:
471:
467:
463:
459:
455:
452:
450:
447:
446:
441:
437:
433:
429:
425:
420:
417:
416:
411:
408:
407:
402:
398:
394:
390:
386:
382:
378:
374:
371:
370:
369:
368:
365:
361:
357:
353:
349:
345:
341:
337:
333:
329:
325:
321:
317:
313:
309:
306:
305:
301:
298:
292:
287:
284:
281:
275:
270:
267:
264:
258:
253:
252:
251:
250:
247:
245:
237:
227:
223:
220:
217:
213:
209:
205:
202:
199:
196:
193:
190:
187:
184:
181:
177:
174:
173:Find sources:
169:
166:
160:
156:
152:
148:
143:
139:
134:
130:
126:
122:
118:
117:
113:
110:
107:
103:
100:
98:
95:
93:
90:
89:
88:
86:
81:
74:
71:
69:
68:
64:
60:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
951:
949:
931:Spicypumpkin
915:
881:this article
876:
859:
828:
812:Spicypumpkin
792:Spicypumpkin
786:
768:
761:
760:
746:
734:
728:
715:
702:Spicypumpkin
698:
657:Medic Mobile
620:
605:
594:WP:CORPDEPTH
591:
585:WP:CORPDEPTH
577:WP:CORPDEPTH
544:WP:CORPDEPTH
527:
512:
475:Spicypumpkin
453:
444:
435:
418:
405:
373:Spicypumpkin
356:Spicypumpkin
344:WP:SECONDARY
307:
239:
233:
221:
215:
207:
200:
194:
188:
182:
172:
78:
49:
47:
31:
28:
919:scope_creep
609:scope_creep
243:scope_creep
198:free images
677:- 8 refs,
466:churnalism
956:talk page
903:WP:ORGIND
864:Foxnpichu
841:Clarkcj12
598:WP:ORGIND
555:WP:ORGIND
495:WP:ORGIND
462:WP:ORGIND
458:WP:ORGIND
385:WP:ORGIND
342:, and 5)
332:WP:SIGCOV
296:Spiderone
279:Spiderone
262:Spiderone
59:Barkeep49
37:talk page
958:or in a
908:changes.
831:Relisted
751:iMedicor
718:Relisted
691:Phreesia
639:this one
621:Comment:
538:] Fails
513:HighKing
499:WP:NCORP
454:Comment:
445:HighKing
440:WP:NCORP
406:HighKing
381:WP:NCORP
312:WP:NCORP
236:WP:NCORP
165:View log
106:glossary
39:or in a
912:WP:SIRS
877:Comment
787:Comment
729:MRD2014
675:UbiCare
645:Doctify
602:WP:SIRS
567:WP:SIRS
548:WP:SIRS
540:WP:SIRS
528:Comment
204:WP refs
192:scholar
138:protect
133:history
121:Doxy.me
83:New to
73:Doxy.me
910:Fails
856:BD2412
762:BD2412
669:Zocdoc
651:Medica
635:MDLIVE
507:WP:SNG
470:WP:NIS
419:Delete
326:, and
176:Google
142:delete
50:delete
860:Merge
747:Merge
426:with
340:WP:RS
338:, 4)
219:JSTOR
180:books
159:views
151:watch
147:links
16:<
935:talk
889:talk
868:talk
845:talk
816:talk
796:talk
753:and
735:talk
706:talk
679:this
503:WP:N
479:talk
360:talk
350:and
308:Keep
212:FENS
186:news
155:logs
129:talk
125:edit
63:talk
604:.
238:.
226:TWL
163:– (
937:)
914:.
891:)
870:)
847:)
818:)
798:)
738:)
708:)
700:--
600:,
596:,
546:,
481:)
473:--
442:.
362:)
322:,
318:,
293:.
276:.
259:.
206:)
157:|
153:|
149:|
145:|
140:|
136:|
131:|
127:|
65:)
933:(
887:(
883:.
866:(
843:(
814:(
794:(
769:T
732:(
704:(
641:.
579:.
557:,
477:(
358:(
352:5
348:4
328:4
324:3
320:2
316:1
230:)
222:·
216:·
208:·
201:·
195:·
189:·
183:·
178:(
170:(
167:)
161:)
123:(
108:)
104:(
61:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.