Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/David Atkins (Royal Navy officer) - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

729:
contained an Appendix running to over 25,000 words, revealing many little-known facts about Gower's associates. This was considered too long for publication but it referred to numerous officers whose later careers showed Gower's influence and support. As the lives of many of these officers are little known today, rather than delete this data, I offer it here for the benefit of readers of the book and for the wider naval history community." So no editorial review, so its just a blog and cannot be regarded as a Reliable Source.
748:(I'd say merge too - if there was anything to merge) to HMS Defence. I'm not seeing "Significant coverage" and as WP:STUB says "If a stub has little verifiable information...it may be deleted or be merged into another relevant article.". I'd say this was pretty close to "Delete"- what is he known for apart from losing a ship and nigh on 600 crew - but I'm feeling generous today. 728:
Copying this over from the Talk Page: The book is presumed to be reliable, the website isn't as it hasn't undergone any editorial review even if it was created by one of the book's authors. Ian M. Bates the webpage owner (not David Bates as you claim in the book reference) states "My draft manuscript
550:
But the book's subject is Gower not Atkins who gets listed under "associated people" (because he served under Gower) in what looks like an appendix; is it Significant coverage? Adding more sources to the article that say the same thing, when the thing is just "Atkins was captain of the Defence when
798:- I think standing consensus is that an established expert (such as an author with a peer-reviewed published book) can have their self-published (i.e. blog) material in the related field treated as reliable. Niehorster's website is often used for Yugoslav ships in this way. - 816:
In this case, having assumed it's reliable as a source, would you say it counts as a second different piece of coverage that counts towards the SIGCOV threshold or lump it together as something like an e-version of the book , or appendix to the book?
205: 466:, Captain David Atkins were ordered to attend her.." which just proves that Atkins was the Captain of the Defence and gives no other details, hardly SIGCOV in multiple RS necessary to meet GNG and just confirms the 442:
They were visible to me. The Clowes/Mahan books is available on line for free in its entirety. It was published in 1900. And even if they aren't visible to you, so what's your point?
199: 282: 166: 139: 134: 143: 707:
Being discussed on the article talk page. I think the sourcing question is independent of this AFD discussion, and I am not suggesting it is outcome determinative at all.
565:
Exactly right. Its not clear that the Atkins information is even contained in the book. Meanwhile 7&6=thirteen you have added a couple more blogs which also aren't RS.
462:
My point is that Users can't assess the sources if they can't see what they say. Using another computer I can see a preview of Clowes/Mahan and all it seems to say is "and
126: 267: 892: 252: 98: 916:
Most of the article's content comes from just one source, the only thing that is well sourced - for some reason with six citations - is him dying when the
113: 130: 672:
A book and an explanatory website are perfectly reliable sources. Lack of a page number is not disqualifying. They should be read in tandem.
220: 187: 934:
Agreed all the detail now comes from Bates' webpage, while the one event that he is known for is extensively sourced. Still fails GNG.
93: 86: 17: 943: 929: 910: 883: 842: 826: 807: 790: 774: 757: 738: 722: 682: 646: 628: 610: 596: 574: 560: 541: 526:
blog. You were complaining that you couldn't see the contents of the other books. You get to see a lot of content in this source.
497: 479: 457: 437: 419: 392: 353: 335: 317: 289: 274: 259: 244: 122: 74: 68: 181: 633:
As noted on the Article Talk Page the Ian M Bates reference is not a Reliable Source as it is a blog by one of the authors of
177: 107: 103: 601:
Update: Google books had Volume 27, January-July 1812 p44 has a brief mention of the loss of the St George and Defence.
964: 227: 40: 903: 876: 787: 715: 616: 534: 450: 412: 349: 313: 584: 193: 925: 822: 753: 624: 606: 592: 556: 960: 897: 870: 838: 803: 784: 709: 528: 444: 406: 36: 865: 770: 345: 309: 695: 637:
providing information not included in the book and so has not been subject to any editorial review.
510: 939: 734: 642: 570: 475: 433: 388: 331: 213: 587:
at the end of Vol 28, but I can't find Atkins elsewhere in the that volume, he may be in others.)
921: 818: 749: 620: 602: 588: 552: 368: 53: 679: 494: 82: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
959:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
834: 799: 861: 857: 401: 372: 301: 237: 766: 580: 371:
the ship that he captained when it was lost. He lacks SIGCOV in multiple RS necessary for
523: 467: 376: 935: 730: 638: 566: 471: 429: 384: 327: 59: 691: 506: 305: 286: 271: 256: 241: 160: 583:
is a contemporary journal, (archive.org seems to have many of the volumes (eg
765:
to HMS Defence, per GraemeLeggett the cited sources completely lack SIGCOV.
341: 891:
Note: This discussion has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's
428:
Atkins is a blog and the two books you have added aren't visible online.
833:
I'd consider it a companion to the book for notability purposes. -
676:
Champion of the Quarterdeck: Admiral Sir Erasmus Gower (1742-1814)
635:
Champion of the Quarterdeck: Admiral Sir Erasmus Gower (1742-1814)
491:
Champion of the Quarterdeck: Admiral Sir Erasmus Gower (1742-1814)
615:
Update to update Archive.org delivers a better scanned/index of
955:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
585:
here is one of the sailors accounts of the loss of Defence
853: 156: 152: 148: 212: 283:
list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions
240:. Seems to be an unlucky, but normal ship captain. 226: 783:to HMS Defence as Atkins lacks SIGCOV on his own. 470:nature and why this should redirect to the ship. 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 967:). No further edits should be made to this page. 281:Note: This discussion has been included in the 266:Note: This discussion has been included in the 251:Note: This discussion has been included in the 268:list of Military-related deletion discussions 8: 551:it ran aground, and he died" is not SigCov. 114:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 253:list of People-related deletion discussions 890: 617:Vol 27 with Atkins appearing in the search 280: 265: 250: 893:list of content for rescue consideration 678:. Pomona, Queensland: Sage Old Books. 674:Bates, David; Gower, David I. (2017). 493:. Pomona, Queensland: Sage Old Books. 489:Bates, David; Gower, David I. (2017). 522:and an associated webpage. Not a non- 344:and so seems fine. My !vote stands. 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 56:. Going down with his ship, again. 304:. There's a nice account of them 24: 123:David Atkins (Royal Navy officer) 75:David Atkins (Royal Navy officer) 99:Introduction to deletion process 326:That's very clearly not an RS. 1: 843:19:00, 27 February 2021 (UTC) 827:08:32, 27 February 2021 (UTC) 808:07:13, 27 February 2021 (UTC) 791:16:53, 26 February 2021 (UTC) 775:13:30, 25 February 2021 (UTC) 758:12:49, 24 February 2021 (UTC) 739:04:02, 27 February 2021 (UTC) 723:17:22, 26 February 2021 (UTC) 647:17:05, 26 February 2021 (UTC) 629:20:43, 24 February 2021 (UTC) 611:20:38, 24 February 2021 (UTC) 597:20:28, 24 February 2021 (UTC) 575:16:02, 24 February 2021 (UTC) 561:15:50, 24 February 2021 (UTC) 542:13:38, 24 February 2021 (UTC) 480:12:43, 24 February 2021 (UTC) 458:12:24, 24 February 2021 (UTC) 438:04:19, 24 February 2021 (UTC) 420:20:28, 23 February 2021 (UTC) 393:03:04, 22 February 2021 (UTC) 336:03:04, 22 February 2021 (UTC) 318:23:53, 21 February 2021 (UTC) 290:16:46, 21 February 2021 (UTC) 275:16:46, 21 February 2021 (UTC) 260:16:46, 21 February 2021 (UTC) 245:16:46, 21 February 2021 (UTC) 854:when nominated for deletion 852:Article is not what it was 89:(AfD)? Read these primers! 984: 340:The source summarises its 944:03:07, 2 March 2021 (UTC) 930:19:39, 1 March 2021 (UTC) 911:15:43, 1 March 2021 (UTC) 884:14:25, 1 March 2021 (UTC) 354:14:55, 1 March 2021 (UTC) 69:12:03, 2 March 2021 (UTC) 957:Please do not modify it. 692:"David Atkins biography" 507:"David Atkins biography" 32:Please do not modify it. 375:. Coverage is largely 342:extensive bibliography 487:Bates is both a book 87:Articles for deletion 796:Point of information 379:of the loss of the 369:HMS Defence (1763) 54:HMS Defence (1763) 913: 619:but still no bio. 292: 277: 262: 104:Guide to deletion 94:How to contribute 67: 975: 909: 899:7&6=thirteen 882: 872:7&6=thirteen 721: 711:7&6=thirteen 706: 704: 702: 688: 540: 530:7&6=thirteen 521: 519: 517: 503: 456: 446:7&6=thirteen 418: 408:7&6=thirteen 231: 230: 216: 164: 146: 84: 66: 64: 57: 34: 983: 982: 978: 977: 976: 974: 973: 972: 971: 965:deletion review 896: 869: 708: 700: 698: 690:Atkins, David. 689: 685: 673: 581:Naval Chronicle 527: 515: 513: 504: 500: 488: 443: 405: 173: 137: 121: 118: 81: 78: 60: 58: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 981: 979: 970: 969: 951: 950: 949: 948: 947: 946: 920:goes aground. 887: 886: 846: 845: 831: 830: 829: 811: 810: 793: 778: 760: 742: 741: 696:Sage Old Books 683: 670: 669: 668: 667: 666: 665: 664: 663: 662: 661: 660: 659: 658: 657: 656: 655: 654: 653: 652: 651: 650: 649: 613: 599: 511:Sage Old Books 505:Bates, David. 498: 423: 422: 395: 361: 360: 359: 358: 357: 356: 321: 320: 294: 293: 278: 263: 234: 233: 170: 117: 116: 111: 101: 96: 79: 77: 72: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 980: 968: 966: 962: 958: 953: 952: 945: 941: 937: 933: 932: 931: 927: 923: 922:GraemeLeggett 919: 915: 914: 912: 907: 906: 901: 900: 894: 889: 888: 885: 880: 879: 874: 873: 867: 863: 859: 855: 851: 848: 847: 844: 840: 836: 832: 828: 824: 820: 819:GraemeLeggett 815: 814: 813: 812: 809: 805: 801: 797: 794: 792: 789: 786: 782: 779: 776: 772: 768: 764: 761: 759: 755: 751: 750:GraemeLeggett 747: 744: 743: 740: 736: 732: 727: 726: 725: 724: 719: 718: 713: 712: 697: 693: 686: 684:9780958702126 681: 677: 648: 644: 640: 636: 632: 631: 630: 626: 622: 621:GraemeLeggett 618: 614: 612: 608: 604: 603:GraemeLeggett 600: 598: 594: 590: 589:GraemeLeggett 586: 582: 578: 577: 576: 572: 568: 564: 563: 562: 558: 554: 553:GraemeLeggett 549: 548: 547: 546: 545: 544: 543: 538: 537: 532: 531: 525: 512: 508: 501: 499:9780958702126 496: 492: 486: 483: 482: 481: 477: 473: 469: 465: 461: 460: 459: 454: 453: 448: 447: 441: 440: 439: 435: 431: 427: 426: 425: 424: 421: 416: 415: 410: 409: 403: 399: 396: 394: 390: 386: 382: 378: 374: 370: 366: 363: 362: 355: 351: 347: 343: 339: 338: 337: 333: 329: 325: 324: 323: 322: 319: 315: 311: 307: 303: 299: 296: 295: 291: 288: 284: 279: 276: 273: 269: 264: 261: 258: 254: 249: 248: 247: 246: 243: 239: 229: 225: 222: 219: 215: 211: 207: 204: 201: 198: 195: 192: 189: 186: 183: 179: 176: 175:Find sources: 171: 168: 162: 158: 154: 150: 145: 141: 136: 132: 128: 124: 120: 119: 115: 112: 109: 105: 102: 100: 97: 95: 92: 91: 90: 88: 83: 76: 73: 71: 70: 65: 63: 55: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 956: 954: 917: 904: 898: 877: 871: 849: 795: 780: 762: 745: 716: 710: 699:. Retrieved 675: 671: 634: 535: 529: 514:. Retrieved 490: 484: 463: 451: 445: 413: 407: 397: 380: 364: 297: 235: 223: 217: 209: 202: 196: 190: 184: 174: 80: 61: 49: 47: 31: 28: 866:WP:Preserve 835:Indy beetle 800:Indy beetle 200:free images 767:Cavalryman 62:Sandstein 961:talk page 936:Mztourist 731:Mztourist 639:Mztourist 567:Mztourist 472:Mztourist 430:Mztourist 385:Mztourist 328:Mztourist 37:talk page 963:or in a 788:darkness 785:Intothat 781:Redirect 763:Redirect 746:Redirect 365:Redirect 167:View log 108:glossary 50:redirect 39:or in a 918:Defence 850:Comment 701:4 April 516:4 April 464:Defence 400:Passes 381:Defence 300:Passes 287:Lettler 272:Lettler 257:Lettler 242:Lettler 206:WP refs 194:scholar 140:protect 135:history 85:New to 862:WP:GNG 858:WP:HEY 485:Adkins 402:WP:GNG 373:WP:GNG 346:Andrew 310:Andrew 302:WP:GNG 238:WP:GNG 236:Fails 178:Google 144:delete 524:WP:RS 468:WP:1E 377:WP:1E 221:JSTOR 182:books 161:views 153:watch 149:links 16:< 940:talk 926:talk 860:. 839:talk 823:talk 804:talk 771:talk 754:talk 735:talk 703:2018 680:ISBN 643:talk 625:talk 607:talk 593:talk 579:The 571:talk 557:talk 518:2018 495:ISBN 476:talk 434:talk 398:Keep 389:talk 350:talk 332:talk 314:talk 306:here 298:Keep 214:FENS 188:news 157:logs 131:talk 127:edit 868:. 864:. 856:. 367:to 348:🐉( 312:🐉( 228:TWL 165:– ( 52:to 942:) 928:) 895:. 841:) 825:) 806:) 773:) 756:) 737:) 694:. 645:) 627:) 609:) 595:) 573:) 559:) 509:. 478:) 436:) 404:. 391:) 383:. 352:) 334:) 316:) 308:. 285:. 270:. 255:. 208:) 159:| 155:| 151:| 147:| 142:| 138:| 133:| 129:| 938:( 924:( 908:) 905:☎ 902:( 881:) 878:☎ 875:( 837:( 821:( 802:( 777:. 769:( 752:( 733:( 720:) 717:☎ 714:( 705:. 687:. 641:( 623:( 605:( 591:( 569:( 555:( 539:) 536:☎ 533:( 520:. 502:. 474:( 455:) 452:☎ 449:( 432:( 417:) 414:☎ 411:( 387:( 330:( 232:) 224:· 218:· 210:· 203:· 197:· 191:· 185:· 180:( 172:( 169:) 163:) 125:( 110:) 106:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
HMS Defence (1763)
Sandstein
12:03, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
David Atkins (Royal Navy officer)

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
David Atkins (Royal Navy officer)
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Google
books
news
scholar
free images

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.