Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/David S. Womack - Knowledge

Source 📝

231:
reliable source media outlets independent of himself, to establish that his work has been externally validated as significant by anybody besides his own public relations agent. But three of the five footnotes shown here are IMDB, a YouTube video, and his own book's buy-it page on Amazon -- and even the two "media" hits are still not actually real journalism, but just two separate reprints of the same Q&A interview, in which he's talking about his own work in the first person, and they're also both explicitly labelled as "Sponsored Advertising Content". All of which means that none of them are reliable or notability-supporting sources at all -- and furthermore, I also had to strip the article of a large profusion of
230:
as passing our notability criteria for filmmakers. As always, every filmmaker is not automatically entitled to have a Knowledge article just because he exists -- the notability test requires certain objective markers of achievement, such as notable awards and/or the reception of enough coverage in
195: 302: 239:
their own sources themselves so that the article is technically "verified" -- notability is not a question of what the article says he did, it's a question of how much attention has or hasn't been
282: 235:
violating offsite links to more Amazon pages, Facebook posts, and other pages that still aren't reliable or notability-supporting sources either. As always, people do not get into Knowledge by
546: 471:
search with "David S. Womack" produces few results that can be used as references, while "David Womack" yields some result but about unrelated people with the name "David Womack". ~
156: 421: 189: 402: 550: 103: 88: 523: 352: 337: 129: 124: 133: 456: 356: 116: 83: 76: 17: 210: 478: 177: 97: 93: 571: 498: 171: 40: 519: 348: 333: 554: 527: 502: 485: 432: 413: 393: 385: 314: 294: 274: 167: 58: 120: 515: 344: 329: 567: 36: 217: 511: 494: 464: 460: 325: 112: 64: 452: 203: 446: 370: 542: 425: 406: 310: 290: 270: 72: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
566:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
183: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
468: 232: 538: 472: 262: 306: 286: 266: 265:
editing by the subject himself or a personal friend, colleague or relative of his.
227: 322:
This page is based on true facts. Do not delete. Cited, paragraphed and verified.
150: 54: 451:
The first two references are completely the same (so count as one) and are
467:
due to the lack of inline citations (and likely references). A
366:: No indication of notability, sources are promotional content. 562:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
303:
list of United States of America-related deletion discussions
257:
I can't prove it outright, but from what I see here I'd be
463:. Apart from that, a large part of the article is hardly 283:
list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions
226:
Highly advertorialized article about a film director, not
146: 142: 138: 493:
an overly promotional article on a non-notable person.
202: 422:list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 574:). No further edits should be made to this page. 420:Note: This discussion has been included in the 401:Note: This discussion has been included in the 301:Note: This discussion has been included in the 281:Note: This discussion has been included in the 403:list of Television-related deletion discussions 216: 8: 104:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 508:Sources updated. Thanks for the heads up. 419: 400: 300: 280: 535:Delete, possibly Speedy delete as spam 547:2601:188:180:B8E0:15C4:2E2D:8425:5AA9 7: 24: 455:, the last three references are 89:Introduction to deletion process 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 555:17:23, 19 February 2021 (UTC) 528:19:17, 18 February 2021 (UTC) 503:15:36, 18 February 2021 (UTC) 486:05:50, 18 February 2021 (UTC) 433:05:39, 18 February 2021 (UTC) 414:05:38, 18 February 2021 (UTC) 394:03:04, 18 February 2021 (UTC) 315:01:47, 18 February 2021 (UTC) 295:01:47, 18 February 2021 (UTC) 275:01:47, 18 February 2021 (UTC) 59:16:35, 25 February 2021 (UTC) 459:, so all source are likely 79:(AfD)? Read these primers! 591: 457:WP:user-generated content 564:Please do not modify it. 261:surprised if this isn't 32:Please do not modify it. 537:. Per nom , apparent 357:few or no other edits 247:the things he did by 77:Articles for deletion 359:outside this topic. 263:conflict of interest 514:comment added by 495:John Pack Lambert 450: 435: 416: 360: 328:comment added by 317: 297: 94:Guide to deletion 84:How to contribute 582: 530: 475: 444: 430: 411: 389: 382: 375: 369: 342: 341: 228:properly sourced 221: 220: 206: 154: 136: 74: 34: 590: 589: 585: 584: 583: 581: 580: 579: 578: 572:deletion review 509: 484: 473: 426: 407: 392: 387: 376: 371: 367: 323: 163: 127: 113:David S. Womack 111: 108: 71: 68: 65:David S. Womack 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 588: 586: 577: 576: 558: 557: 516:Lastphotograph 506: 505: 488: 477: 437: 436: 417: 397: 396: 384: 361: 345:Lastphotograph 330:Lastphotograph 319: 318: 298: 256: 224: 223: 160: 107: 106: 101: 91: 86: 69: 67: 62: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 587: 575: 573: 569: 565: 560: 559: 556: 552: 548: 544: 540: 536: 533: 532: 531: 529: 525: 521: 517: 513: 504: 500: 496: 492: 489: 487: 483: 481: 476: 470: 466: 465:WP:verifiable 462: 461:WP:unreliable 458: 454: 453:WP:interviews 448: 447:edit conflict 442: 439: 438: 434: 431: 429: 423: 418: 415: 412: 410: 404: 399: 398: 395: 391: 390: 383: 381: 380: 374: 365: 362: 358: 354: 350: 346: 339: 335: 331: 327: 321: 320: 316: 312: 308: 304: 299: 296: 292: 288: 284: 279: 278: 277: 276: 272: 268: 264: 260: 254: 250: 246: 242: 241:independently 238: 234: 229: 219: 215: 212: 209: 205: 201: 197: 194: 191: 188: 185: 182: 179: 176: 173: 169: 166: 165:Find sources: 161: 158: 152: 148: 144: 140: 135: 131: 126: 122: 118: 114: 110: 109: 105: 102: 99: 95: 92: 90: 87: 85: 82: 81: 80: 78: 73: 66: 63: 61: 60: 57: 56: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 563: 561: 534: 510:— Preceding 507: 490: 482:harge-parity 479: 440: 428:CAPTAIN RAJU 427: 409:CAPTAIN RAJU 408: 386: 378: 377: 372: 363: 324:— Preceding 258: 252: 248: 244: 240: 236: 225: 213: 207: 199: 192: 186: 180: 174: 164: 70: 53: 49: 47: 31: 28: 355:) has made 249:journalists 190:free images 543:WP:TOOSOON 253:real media 568:talk page 469:WP:before 259:extremely 37:talk page 570:or in a 524:contribs 512:unsigned 474:Ase1este 379:spinster 353:contribs 338:contribs 326:unsigned 237:creating 157:View log 98:glossary 39:or in a 307:Bearcat 287:Bearcat 267:Bearcat 233:WP:ELNO 196:WP refs 184:scholar 130:protect 125:history 75:New to 539:WP:COI 491:Delete 441:Delete 364:Delete 168:Google 134:delete 50:delete 373:disco 243:paid 211:JSTOR 172:books 151:views 143:watch 139:links 16:< 551:talk 520:talk 499:talk 449:× 1) 388:talk 349:talk 334:talk 311:talk 291:talk 271:talk 204:FENS 178:news 147:logs 121:talk 117:edit 55:Tone 443:. 368:... 251:in 218:TWL 155:– ( 553:) 545:. 541:. 526:) 522:• 501:) 424:. 405:. 351:• 343:— 340:) 336:• 313:) 305:. 293:) 285:. 273:) 245:to 198:) 149:| 145:| 141:| 137:| 132:| 128:| 123:| 119:| 52:. 549:( 518:( 497:( 480:c 445:( 347:( 332:( 309:( 289:( 269:( 255:. 222:) 214:· 208:· 200:· 193:· 187:· 181:· 175:· 170:( 162:( 159:) 153:) 115:( 100:) 96:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Tone
16:35, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
David S. Womack

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
David S. Womack
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.