224:
was one of the most important developments in the history of AILS. The end result "Ido" (= offspring in
Esperanto) and its similarities and differences relative to Esperanto are of great importance in the area of International Auxiliary Languages even today: to such an extent that many an Esperantist
356:
Knowledge (XXG) has several articles comparing auxiliary languages – Ido and
Interlingua, Interlingua and Esperanto, and so on. Comparison in itself doesn't make an article original research. A few points in the article are questionable at best. Sidney Culbert’s figure of 1.6 million Esperanto
250:
I found the article inadequately referenced which is why I made the nomination. The sources are not clearly referenced in my opinion. I hope its sources will be specified more clearly and then deletion unnecessary. The genesis of Ido from
Esperanto has been the object of scholarly study by the
236:
You have nominated the article for deletion, and are now suggesting to keep it, with everyone else suggesting to delete it (so you can hardly have changed your mind based on what is said in this AfD). This seems suspiciously like you are trying to make a
357:
speakers is certainly not the “most reliable estimate.” Culbert provided too little information to evaluate the accuracy of this figure, and even if it was once accurate, it is outdated now. But these details can be addressed without deleting.
283:
221:
327:
286:, with more emphasis on why some believed a new international auxiliary language was necessary, based on sources, rather than an original analysis of the differences between the languages.
251:
philosopher
Couturat as well as linguists. I suspect that the article may in some places be a bit OR, but that could be cleaned up by sticking more closely to original sources.
90:
85:
94:
322:) and their comparison is useful in order to understand the development of constructed languages around 1900. - On the other side this AfD looks really like a
225:
would dearly love all references to Ido and comparisons with
Esperanto to be obliterated. I therefore suggest that deletion of this article would be partisan.
77:
208:
17:
172:
per nom: I hope we don't get articles comparing any two languages, no matter if they are related or unrelated. The paragraph in
81:
348:
334:
302:
290:
268:
255:
245:
229:
212:
180:
164:
144:
128:
376:
36:
282:: This is original research. If indeed the break between Ido and Esperanto is significant, it might be covered under
73:
65:
311:
342:
per
Ioannes. OR is usually a cleanup issue, I don't think it has been proven that the subject is inherently OR.
375:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
137:
331:
196:
201:
323:
261:
238:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
299:
252:
226:
125:
319:
157:
287:
344:
191:
260:
That's not an explanation of why you changed your mind. Please refrain from making
141:
111:
161:
54:
265:
242:
177:
318:. These two languages are really comparable, were often compared (i.e. no
330:. But we should not punish otherwise reasonable articles for it...--
298:
Original research. Heimstern Laufer's point above is well-made. --
284:
Delegation for the
Adoption of an International Auxiliary Language
222:
Delegation_for_the_Adoption_of_an_International_Auxiliary_Language
369:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
315:
173:
328:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Ido and Novial compared
107:
103:
99:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
124:Reason for proposed deletion: original research.
379:). No further edits should be made to this page.
310:- the strangely titled article is a product of
8:
176:seems more than sufficient for the subject.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
314:, derived from the featured article
220:and reference more carefully. The
24:
241:, which is heavily frowned upon.
1:
349:22:29, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
335:22:06, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
312:Knowledge (XXG):Summary style
303:20:46, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
291:19:22, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
269:05:58, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
256:22:41, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
246:20:44, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
230:17:57, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
213:16:10, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
181:15:26, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
165:13:36, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
145:13:19, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
129:22:58, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
396:
74:Esperanto_and_Ido_compared
66:Esperanto and Ido compared
372:Please do not modify it.
326:, probably related with
136:This AfD nomination was
32:Please do not modify it.
140:. It is listed now.
188:per nom and Fram. ~
332:Ioannes Pragensis
264:AfD nominations.
158:original research
59:
58:2006-12-27 05:41Z
387:
374:
288:Heimstern Läufer
204:
199:
194:
115:
97:
61:
57:
50:
34:
395:
394:
390:
389:
388:
386:
385:
384:
383:
377:deletion review
370:
210:
200:
195:
190:
88:
72:
69:
51:
45:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
393:
391:
382:
381:
365:
364:
358:
351:
337:
305:
293:
276:
275:
274:
273:
272:
271:
233:
232:
215:
207:
183:
167:
150:
149:
148:
147:
122:
121:
68:
63:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
392:
380:
378:
373:
367:
366:
362:
359:
355:
352:
350:
347:
346:
341:
338:
336:
333:
329:
325:
321:
317:
313:
309:
306:
304:
301:
297:
294:
292:
289:
285:
281:
278:
277:
270:
267:
263:
259:
258:
257:
254:
249:
248:
247:
244:
240:
235:
234:
231:
228:
223:
219:
216:
214:
209:
205:
203:
198:
193:
187:
184:
182:
179:
175:
171:
168:
166:
163:
159:
155:
152:
151:
146:
143:
139:
135:
134:
133:
132:
131:
130:
127:
119:
113:
109:
105:
101:
96:
92:
87:
83:
79:
75:
71:
70:
67:
64:
62:
60:
56:
48:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
371:
368:
360:
353:
343:
339:
307:
295:
279:
217:
189:
185:
169:
156:- unsourced
153:
123:
117:
52:
47:No consensus
46:
43:
31:
28:
300:SunStar Net
253:Nov ialiste
227:Nov ialiste
126:Nov ialiste
138:incomplete
345:hateless
324:WP:POINT
262:WP:POINT
239:WP:POINT
118:View AfD
142:DumbBOT
91:protect
86:history
296:Delete
280:Delete
186:Delete
170:Delete
154:Delete
95:delete
361:Keep.
354:Keep.
320:WP:OR
162:MER-C
116:ďż˝-- (
112:views
104:watch
100:links
55:Quarl
16:<
340:Keep
308:Keep
266:Fram
243:Fram
218:Keep
178:Fram
108:logs
82:talk
78:edit
316:Ido
174:Ido
211:/
202:oy
192:Ed
160:.
110:|
106:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
84:|
80:|
363:*
206:\
197:B
120:)
114:)
76:(
53:—
49:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.