Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Ethics of decompilation - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

214:
Speaking as a Software Engineer, I have no reason to believe this article is anything more than original research in an essay format. The question of the ethics of decompilation may be considered interesting, but the concept is completely unable to establish nessisary notabiltiy for an article.
196:
per nomination. As Ham Pastrami says this is already covered in the main article and this is basically nothing more than an essay. It was probably created in good faith but it's just a bad idea so delete.
118: 85: 80: 89: 72: 163:
could become an interesting Knowledge (XXG) article. However the article would need to be completely rewritten to keep it from being an
17: 250: 184: 137:
already covers the issue of legality. I don't think the nominated article adds anything useful to that discussion, so I vote
243: 269: 254: 224: 206: 188: 150: 54: 36: 76: 268:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
68: 60: 202: 146: 160: 49: 220: 180: 198: 142: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
130: 238: 234: 168: 164: 126: 216: 176: 106: 134: 125:
Unreferenced and largely unquantifiable discussion in violation of
262:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
113: 102: 98: 94: 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 272:). No further edits should be made to this page. 8: 171:to back up a single one of the facts. 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 24: 133:a publisher of personal essays. 1: 255:17:01, 13 February 2008 (UTC) 225:19:55, 11 February 2008 (UTC) 207:16:53, 11 February 2008 (UTC) 189:15:22, 11 February 2008 (UTC) 151:14:54, 11 February 2008 (UTC) 55:14:28, 17 February 2008 (UTC) 289: 265:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 245:Otolemur crassicaudatus 69:Ethics of decompilation 61:Ethics of decompilation 161:subject of the article 48:. Non-admin closure. 280: 267: 246: 169:reliable sources 116: 110: 92: 52: 44:The result was 34: 288: 287: 283: 282: 281: 279: 278: 277: 276: 270:deletion review 263: 244: 239:reliable source 112: 83: 67: 64: 50: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 286: 284: 275: 274: 258: 257: 228: 227: 209: 191: 123: 122: 63: 58: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 285: 273: 271: 266: 260: 259: 256: 252: 248: 247: 240: 236: 233: 230: 229: 226: 222: 218: 213: 210: 208: 204: 200: 195: 192: 190: 186: 182: 178: 174: 170: 166: 162: 158: 155: 154: 153: 152: 148: 144: 140: 136: 132: 128: 120: 115: 108: 104: 100: 96: 91: 87: 82: 78: 74: 70: 66: 65: 62: 59: 57: 56: 53: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 264: 261: 242: 231: 211: 199:EconomicsGuy 193: 172: 167:without any 159:I think the 156: 143:Ham Pastrami 138: 124: 45: 43: 31: 28: 135:Decompiler 51:скоморохъ 217:Verdatum 185:contribs 119:View log 86:protect 81:history 232:Delete 212:Delete 194:Delete 157:Delete 139:Delete 131:WP:NOT 114:delete 90:delete 46:delete 237:, no 235:WP:OR 165:essay 127:WP:OR 117:) – ( 107:views 99:watch 95:links 16:< 251:talk 221:talk 203:talk 181:talk 177:user 147:talk 129:and 103:logs 77:talk 73:edit 253:) 241:. 223:) 205:) 187:) 183:• 179:• 173:~a 149:) 141:. 105:| 101:| 97:| 93:| 88:| 84:| 79:| 75:| 249:( 219:( 215:- 201:( 175:( 145:( 121:) 111:( 109:) 71:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
скоморохъ
14:28, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
Ethics of decompilation
Ethics of decompilation
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
delete
View log
WP:OR
WP:NOT
Decompiler
Ham Pastrami
talk
14:54, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
subject of the article
essay
reliable sources
user
talk
contribs
15:22, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.