374:
plot summary or to establish notability satisfactorily. In other words, there is inherently no content that could be included in this fictional timeline because the basis for content inclusion on
Knowledge is whether or not such content appears verifiable, reliable, independent sources. It simply doesn't appear such sources exist, so the article should be deleted.
373:
are policies, not guidelines. I think the real point here (and why this article has been AFDed 3 times) is that under no circumstances will any amount of improvement bring the article up to policy, mainly because reliable secondary sources do not appear to exist to provide real-world analysis for the
351:
of the article. so the offending content should not remain on WP. This in itself doesn't mean the article shouldn't remain on WP. Now I made it a comment instead of voting keep because I haven't checked things out yet, I strongly suspect it should be deleted, just not using these arguments.
518:
Since the game is a notable game in the real world, the summary of the overall sequence of events in a reasonably concise manner like here is notable as a part of the subject--an acceptable subarticle, written separately because of the size of the main article.
222:
162:
99:
94:
326:
Did you read the nomination? It details the policies that are broken. The fact that they have been broken for so long in this case only goes to reinforce that the article shouldn't remain on
Knowledge.
234:
on this article, none of which attempted to improve the issues other than adding an in-universe template. It is apparently obvious that no effort will be done to fix the problems this article has.
154:
89:
429:
as the article concenrs a recognizble subject, contains multiple references, is well-organized, and survived two AfDs already. Plus, as others have argued,
478:, nor do I have any reason to believe notability exists. Further, the afforementioned appropriate parent article is not remotely large enough to justify a
256:
of time yet absolutely nothing has been done to address any of the concerns raised. There is no reason to allow this to remain on
Knowledge any longer.
252:
per nom's excellent analysis. Numerous policies are still broken, despite claims of the potential for improvement in previous AFDs. There has been
127:
122:
131:
114:
609:
568:
547:
530:
510:
491:
462:
453:
In universe (and unreferenced) content with no significant coverage from real world sources. Best if transwikied to an an EQ wiki.
445:
411:
397:
383:
361:
336:
321:
296:
265:
243:
72:
439:
17:
434:
482:
split. Ideally, any worthwhile content should be merged there. I don't see any worthwhile content, so again, delete. -
225:
over two months ago. Such sources do not even seem acceptable in the first place, ranging from game manuals to forums.
538:. Article is not really improved since my first nomination, and all problems persist and seem likely to stay that way.
597:
627:
36:
221:
on this article were very poorly done, with some of them not working, and still were not working even since the
626:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
501:- I don't see how this topic has any real-world notability. Nominator makes many other good points as well. -
118:
60:) would be enough to be fatal— coupled with the lack of attempts at salvaging it deletion is unavoidable.
581:
407:
379:
332:
261:
475:
110:
78:
506:
312:...oh wait, no it isn't. Please argue the article's potential, not the article's current contents. -
273:
Looks like it's had its chance. The important parts are already covered in other articles, such as
239:
487:
393:
357:
317:
309:
305:
403:
375:
328:
257:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
564:
218:
186:
577:
502:
458:
343:
207:
182:
576:
Suggest merging whatever possible to the main article; this is pushing the boundaries of
543:
479:
471:
278:
235:
175:
402:
Well, I didn't really say anything that wasn't already essentially in the nomimation.
308:. We'd better hurry and delete this, as 2 months is dangerously approaching the edit
526:
483:
389:
366:
353:
313:
193:
211:
57:
53:
148:
560:
370:
200:
179:
49:
454:
69:
192:
As a timeline, this article contains in-universe storylines, something which
68:
no prose to merge and the article is little but a table of bullet points. —
539:
521:
556:
274:
61:
620:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
580:, and while the game may be notable, not every facet of it is.
559:; between the two articles, one decent article should emerge.
100:
Articles for deletion/EverQuest timeline (3rd nomination)
95:
Articles for deletion/EverQuest timeline (2nd nomination)
230:
167:
144:
140:
136:
171:has been done to fix the issues upon this article.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
630:). No further edits should be made to this page.
165:resulted in "No consensus" over two months ago,
64:has been mentioned as a merge target, but there
228:Despite the previous AfD, there has only been
474:this article does not show notability beyond
203:to the real world and non-EverQuest players.
8:
90:Articles for deletion/EverQuest timeline
87:
214:, something not welcome in Knowledge.
7:
304:So far, the only argument I see is
85:
48:; the problems with this article (
24:
388:And that is a valid argument :) -
174:The article still appears to be
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
210:has a tendency to attracting
610:02:20, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
569:20:43, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
548:13:48, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
531:02:34, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
511:18:30, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
492:09:08, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
463:08:45, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
446:22:09, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
441:Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles
412:22:52, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
398:22:18, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
384:22:14, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
362:21:35, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
337:21:27, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
322:21:13, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
297:19:47, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
266:17:52, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
244:16:47, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
73:04:40, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
54:reliable, secondary sources
647:
623:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
199:Such material is still
84:AfDs for this article:
163:previous nomination
476:Everquest universe
347:are broken in the
111:EverQuest timeline
79:EverQuest timeline
231:three edits total
212:original research
58:original research
638:
625:
607:
605:
604:
595:
444:
442:
433:does not have a
294:
291:
288:
285:
233:
194:Knowledge is not
170:
168:nearly no effort
152:
134:
34:
646:
645:
641:
640:
639:
637:
636:
635:
634:
628:deletion review
621:
606:
602:
600:
598:
582:
561:John Vandenberg
555:and merge with
440:
438:
292:
289:
286:
283:
229:
166:
125:
109:
106:
104:
82:
50:unverifiability
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
644:
642:
633:
632:
615:
613:
612:
599:
571:
550:
533:
513:
495:
494:
465:
448:
424:
423:
422:
421:
420:
419:
418:
417:
416:
415:
414:
299:
279:Andrew Lenahan
268:
176:plot summaries
159:
158:
105:
103:
102:
97:
92:
86:
83:
81:
76:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
643:
631:
629:
624:
618:
617:
616:
611:
608:
596:
593:
589:
585:
579:
575:
572:
570:
566:
562:
558:
554:
551:
549:
545:
541:
537:
534:
532:
528:
524:
523:
517:
514:
512:
508:
504:
500:
497:
496:
493:
489:
485:
481:
477:
473:
469:
466:
464:
460:
456:
452:
449:
447:
443:
436:
432:
428:
425:
413:
409:
405:
401:
400:
399:
395:
391:
387:
386:
385:
381:
377:
372:
368:
365:
364:
363:
359:
355:
350:
346:
345:
340:
339:
338:
334:
330:
325:
324:
323:
319:
315:
311:
307:
303:
300:
298:
295:
280:
276:
272:
269:
267:
263:
259:
255:
251:
250:Strong Delete
248:
247:
246:
245:
241:
237:
232:
226:
224:
220:
217:Finally, the
215:
213:
209:
204:
202:
197:
195:
190:
188:
184:
181:
177:
172:
169:
164:
156:
150:
146:
142:
138:
133:
129:
124:
120:
116:
112:
108:
107:
101:
98:
96:
93:
91:
88:
80:
77:
75:
74:
71:
67:
63:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
622:
619:
614:
601:Call me MoP!
591:
587:
583:
573:
552:
535:
520:
515:
498:
467:
450:
430:
426:
404:Doctorfluffy
376:Doctorfluffy
348:
342:
329:Doctorfluffy
301:
282:
270:
258:Doctorfluffy
253:
249:
227:
223:previous AfD
216:
205:
198:
191:
187:poor sources
173:
161:Despite the
160:
65:
45:
43:
31:
28:
437:. Best, --
341:Sure did.
306:WP:NOEFFORT
206:Containing
503:FrankTobia
344:Guidelines
52:, lack of
431:Knowledge
236:IAmSasori
201:unnotable
180:unnotable
578:WP:CRUFT
484:Verdatum
435:deadline
390:Verdatum
354:Verdatum
314:Verdatum
310:deadline
155:View log
557:Norrath
480:WP:SIZE
472:WP:FICT
349:content
302:Comment
275:Norrath
219:sources
128:protect
123:history
62:Norrath
594:uppets
586:aster
536:Delete
499:Delete
468:Delete
451:Delete
367:WP:NOT
271:Delete
254:plenty
132:delete
46:Delete
574:Merge
455:Corpx
208:cruft
185:with
183:cruft
149:views
141:watch
137:links
70:Coren
16:<
565:talk
553:Keep
544:talk
540:Fram
527:talk
516:Keep
507:talk
488:talk
470:per
459:talk
427:Keep
408:talk
394:talk
380:talk
371:WP:V
369:and
358:talk
333:talk
318:talk
262:talk
240:talk
145:logs
119:talk
115:edit
56:and
522:DGG
290:bli
178:of
153:– (
590:f
567:)
546:)
529:)
509:)
490:)
461:)
410:)
396:)
382:)
360:)
335:)
320:)
293:nd
287:ar
284:St
281:-
277:.
264:)
242:)
196:.
189:.
147:|
143:|
139:|
135:|
130:|
126:|
121:|
117:|
66:is
603:☺
592:P
588:o
584:M
563:(
542:(
525:(
505:(
486:(
457:(
406:(
392:(
378:(
356:(
352:-
331:(
316:(
260:(
238:(
157:)
151:)
113:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.