Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/FCMOV - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

787:, there are dozens of technical references that include these instructions, as well as many books on programming for the x86 processors that include discussions on them as well. In the case of INT, I know there was a very popular list of interrupts maintained by Ralf Brown. As an aside: assembly language was one of the original methods of programming computers. Just like using a flint and stone was the primary method of creating fire for a time, we shouldn't let this be lost to history simply because it's fallen out of fashion for computer programmers today. I see potential for growth going forward, and believe this part of computing history to be important enough to keep. — 750:. If there were an infinite number of instructions, I'd see the logic, but as there is a finite number there's no practical reason not to have an article for each. In the alternative, there should be notability guidelines to help explain when an instruction is or isn't notable enough for its own article. JMP, TEST and INT are more than notable enough, HLT and the various MOVxxx instructions less so. — 238:
An article on a single instruction in some version(s) of the Intel/AMD x86 architecture, consisting of very little more than specifications copied from a manual. From what I gather there is a lot of change around these from one generation to the next. Articles on single instructions from every
239:
notable computer would constitute a huge, make-work, cluttery project with dozens of disambiguation pages (how many computers had a NOP instruction?). The level of detail is excessive, and in practice the x86 devices are the only ones with these articles.
804:
Fair point. Some of the commands should get their own articles, although I still think others should just get sections in a bigger article (e.g. all but HLT, INT, and JMP). I'll update my recommendation.
207: 160: 652: 687:
with a few extra words there (that also looks manualist/instructionalist) (although that article is 11th words so probably needs pruning/splitting)? ditto with the others.
201: 92: 107: 551: 546: 555: 367: 362: 321: 316: 275: 270: 371: 325: 279: 538: 354: 308: 262: 167: 87: 80: 17: 796: 759: 60: 101: 97: 829: 605: 861: 40: 542: 459: 454: 222: 505: 500: 463: 413: 408: 358: 312: 266: 189: 509: 417: 133: 128: 718: 706: 446: 137: 692: 492: 400: 676: 534: 120: 857: 840: 810: 775: 734: 726: 350: 304: 258: 36: 747: 631: 183: 792: 788: 767: 755: 751: 660: 58: 215: 179: 688: 844: 814: 799: 779: 762: 738: 696: 664: 643: 620: 597: 248: 62: 616: 76: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
856:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
229: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
806: 784: 771: 730: 722: 639: 593: 244: 656: 53: 770:, can you give some reliable sources that indicate the notability of JMP, TEST, and INT? 630:- the number of articles on these instructions is not a problem as Knowledge (XXG) is 450: 195: 572: 526: 480: 434: 388: 342: 296: 154: 635: 589: 496: 404: 240: 124: 588:
instructions because these have information beyond simple specifications.
721:. if there's content worth saving. Absolutely non-notable by themselves. 52:. It may be better to nominate specific instruction articles separately. 581: 442: 679:, was this a significant development in x86 architecture? could it be 585: 488: 396: 253:
I am also nominating the following related pages on the same basis:
116: 68: 852:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
684: 832:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
608:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
568: 564: 560: 522: 518: 514: 476: 472: 468: 430: 426: 422: 384: 380: 376: 338: 334: 330: 292: 288: 284: 150: 146: 142: 214: 838:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 614:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 228: 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 864:). No further edits should be made to this page. 651:Note: This discussion has been included in the 653:list of Computing-related deletion discussions 8: 108:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 650: 729:) 06:26, 22 August 2018 (UTC); changed 580:Note that I have excluded pages on the 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 24: 93:Introduction to deletion process 675:, this appears to be part of a 1: 815:05:51, 2 September 2018 (UTC) 739:05:52, 2 September 2018 (UTC) 63:13:03, 5 September 2018 (UTC) 845:07:37, 28 August 2018 (UTC) 800:17:57, 28 August 2018 (UTC) 780:05:53, 23 August 2018 (UTC) 763:18:13, 22 August 2018 (UTC) 697:01:09, 22 August 2018 (UTC) 665:22:23, 21 August 2018 (UTC) 644:19:20, 21 August 2018 (UTC) 621:02:07, 21 August 2018 (UTC) 598:13:20, 13 August 2018 (UTC) 249:12:44, 13 August 2018 (UTC) 83:(AfD)? Read these primers! 881: 854:Please do not modify it. 719:x86 instruction listings 707:x86 instruction listings 32:Please do not modify it. 535:TEST (x86 instruction) 713:JMP, TEST, INT, HLT, 351:JMP (x86 instruction) 305:INT (x86 instruction) 259:HLT (x86 instruction) 81:Articles for deletion 847: 667: 623: 98:Guide to deletion 88:How to contribute 872: 843: 837: 835: 833: 619: 613: 611: 609: 576: 558: 530: 512: 484: 466: 438: 420: 392: 374: 346: 328: 300: 282: 233: 232: 218: 170: 158: 140: 78: 34: 880: 879: 875: 874: 873: 871: 870: 869: 868: 862:deletion review 848: 839: 828: 826: 705:all of them to 624: 615: 604: 602: 549: 533: 503: 487: 457: 441: 411: 395: 365: 349: 319: 303: 273: 257: 175: 166: 131: 115: 112: 75: 72: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 878: 876: 867: 866: 836: 825: 824: 823: 822: 821: 820: 819: 818: 817: 741: 699: 669: 668: 657:Dom from Paris 647: 646: 612: 601: 578: 577: 531: 485: 439: 393: 347: 301: 236: 235: 172: 111: 110: 105: 95: 90: 73: 71: 66: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 877: 865: 863: 859: 855: 850: 849: 846: 842: 841:North America 834: 831: 816: 812: 808: 803: 802: 801: 798: 794: 790: 786: 783: 782: 781: 777: 773: 769: 766: 765: 764: 761: 757: 753: 749: 745: 742: 740: 736: 732: 728: 724: 720: 716: 712: 709: 708: 704: 700: 698: 694: 690: 689:Coolabahapple 686: 682: 678: 674: 671: 670: 666: 662: 658: 654: 649: 648: 645: 641: 637: 633: 629: 626: 625: 622: 618: 610: 607: 600: 599: 595: 591: 587: 583: 574: 570: 566: 562: 557: 553: 548: 544: 540: 536: 532: 528: 524: 520: 516: 511: 507: 502: 498: 494: 490: 486: 482: 478: 474: 470: 465: 461: 456: 452: 448: 444: 440: 436: 432: 428: 424: 419: 415: 410: 406: 402: 398: 394: 390: 386: 382: 378: 373: 369: 364: 360: 356: 352: 348: 344: 340: 336: 332: 327: 323: 318: 314: 310: 306: 302: 298: 294: 290: 286: 281: 277: 272: 268: 264: 260: 256: 255: 254: 251: 250: 246: 242: 231: 227: 224: 221: 217: 213: 209: 206: 203: 200: 197: 194: 191: 188: 185: 181: 178: 177:Find sources: 173: 169: 165: 162: 156: 152: 148: 144: 139: 135: 130: 126: 122: 118: 114: 113: 109: 106: 103: 99: 96: 94: 91: 89: 86: 85: 84: 82: 77: 70: 67: 65: 64: 61: 59: 57: 56: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 853: 851: 827: 743: 717:the rest to 714: 710: 702: 701: 680: 672: 627: 617:SkyGazer 512 603: 579: 252: 237: 225: 219: 211: 204: 198: 192: 186: 176: 163: 74: 54: 50:no consensus 49: 47: 31: 28: 807:Enterprisey 785:Enterprisey 772:Enterprisey 731:Enterprisey 723:Enterprisey 632:WP:NOTPAPER 202:free images 789:Locke Cole 768:Locke Cole 752:Locke Cole 681:redirected 55:Ritchie333 858:talk page 37:talk page 860:or in a 830:Relisted 748:NOTPAPER 606:Relisted 161:View log 102:glossary 39:or in a 673:Comment 582:LOADALL 552:protect 547:history 506:protect 501:history 460:protect 455:history 443:MOVDDUP 414:protect 409:history 368:protect 363:history 322:protect 317:history 276:protect 271:history 208:WP refs 196:scholar 134:protect 129:history 79:New to 677:manual 636:Scarpy 590:Mangoe 586:RdRand 556:delete 510:delete 489:MOVHPD 464:delete 418:delete 397:MOVAPD 372:delete 326:delete 280:delete 241:Mangoe 180:Google 138:delete 811:talk! 776:talk! 735:talk! 727:talk! 715:Merge 703:Merge 573:views 565:watch 561:links 527:views 519:watch 515:links 481:views 473:watch 469:links 435:views 427:watch 423:links 389:views 381:watch 377:links 343:views 335:watch 331:links 297:views 289:watch 285:links 223:JSTOR 184:books 168:Stats 155:views 147:watch 143:links 117:FCMOV 69:FCMOV 16:< 744:Keep 711:Keep 693:talk 661:talk 640:talk 634:. - 628:Keep 594:talk 584:and 569:logs 543:talk 539:edit 523:logs 497:talk 493:edit 477:logs 451:talk 447:edit 431:logs 405:talk 401:edit 385:logs 359:talk 355:edit 339:logs 313:talk 309:edit 293:logs 267:talk 263:edit 245:talk 216:FENS 190:news 151:logs 125:talk 121:edit 685:x86 683:to 230:TWL 159:– ( 813:) 795:• 791:• 778:) 758:• 754:• 746:, 737:) 695:) 663:) 655:. 642:) 596:) 571:| 567:| 563:| 559:| 554:| 550:| 545:| 541:| 525:| 521:| 517:| 513:| 508:| 504:| 499:| 495:| 479:| 475:| 471:| 467:| 462:| 458:| 453:| 449:| 433:| 429:| 425:| 421:| 416:| 412:| 407:| 403:| 387:| 383:| 379:| 375:| 370:| 366:| 361:| 357:| 341:| 337:| 333:| 329:| 324:| 320:| 315:| 311:| 295:| 291:| 287:| 283:| 278:| 274:| 269:| 265:| 247:) 210:) 153:| 149:| 145:| 141:| 136:| 132:| 127:| 123:| 809:( 797:c 793:t 774:( 760:c 756:t 733:( 725:( 691:( 659:( 638:( 592:( 575:) 537:( 529:) 491:( 483:) 445:( 437:) 399:( 391:) 353:( 345:) 307:( 299:) 261:( 243:( 234:) 226:· 220:· 212:· 205:· 199:· 193:· 187:· 182:( 174:( 171:) 164:· 157:) 119:( 104:) 100:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Ritchie333


13:03, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
FCMOV

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
FCMOV
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.