281:
website and from an interview i did with them. I noticed some of the reasons why this was not worthy of an entry "No notable labels or tours" come on - that really is BS. DIY bands do not involve themselves with major labels or major tours. They have completed two euro tours and touring america next year. If you're truly a fan of independent music, you would KNOW how much work goes into touring, and releasing records. To say none of that is notable is a huge disrespect to bands, and DIY music. I have noticed so many bands on this site that have no notable reason for having a page, yet do have a page. I feel that this deletion has more to do with deletionists on a power trip, who don't like or know a band and therefor delete pages that don't fall into their field of what is deemed worthy. This undeadwarrior guy, using his wiki project on black metal as a reason for deleting fall efrafa- congratulations, you know a lot about black metal, but do you know anything about fall of efrafa, who take influence from ambient folk black metal? does this mean youll delete wolves in the throne room, velnias and agalloch's pages next? Its a shame, because i wished to contribute other bands and items to wiki, and now feel that there really isn't any point.
352:--I agree with Warrior and Baz. (And it is a WHOLE lot of words in that article.) When notability is not only achieved but also established (Grilledvegetables, that's the point of an encyclopedia--the dispersal of accepted and verifiable knowledge), then this article may return. Baz, I didn't see any tunes on the band's Myspace--burn me a copy when you get those CDs in, will you? ;)
224:
warrants deletion. The whole entire point of wikipedia is to learn, and the simple fact is that if this page gets deleted,someone else will put it back up. This band have completed noteworthy tours, two successful albums and have a very interesting message to forward. please do not delete this page simply because you have the power to do so.
223:
I do not think that the reasons for deleting my entry are substantial enough. The entry is well written, points to references of a band with a large underground fanbase, with a notable and interesting concept. I do not think that just because this band is not known to you as individuals that this
280:
i am not in any way associated with the band, and i cannot see how you could see wikipedia as free advertising for a band! its an online encyclopedia. Im angry because i wrote a lot of this article because i felt that they deserved a decent online description. A lot was borrowed from the bands
254:
I don't think anyone above has suggested the article is deleted simply because they have not heard of the band; the issue revolves around notability as established through reliable sources. These sources have not (yet) been provided, possibly because they do not exist. Knowledge (XXG), as an
255:
encyclopedia, is obviously a repository of information, but its purpose does not include free advertising for any old band that fancies having a page on here. Finally, your suggestion that someone would just put the page back up is on shakey ground; replaced content would be
303:; Fall of Efrafa, at present and without further sourcing, do not. It's nothing to do with not liking them... as I stated above, they sound really interesting and I have just ordered both of their albums. They are simply not notable by Knowledge (XXG) standards.
291:. If a band doesn't pass those (pretty lenient) conditions, then they shouldn't have an article on Knowledge (XXG). If a band refuses to do major interviews, sign to a notable label, do touring that is covered significantly by reliable sources, they are
328:
120:
287:
I think it's a real shame you feel that way, as we always need new editors for
Knowledge (XXG). However, there's a few things you need to bear in mind; firstly, please read
166:
209:
Pains me to say it, as the band sounds really interesting, but no, not notable; I'd tidied the article up but couldn't find any reliable sources for it.
240:
194:
guidelines. The listed interviews aren't independent sources (one of them specifically state that they encourage bands to request reviews). -
87:
82:
17:
91:
74:
263:
to prevent its re-creation until the band does something of note. With that, I am going to order some Fall of Efrafa CDs :)
376:
36:
236:
375:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
177:
151:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
308:
268:
232:
214:
199:
361:
343:
312:
272:
244:
228:
218:
201:
181:
155:
56:
295:
and have no place here. Regarding your specific reference to the nominator, tread carefully and read
339:
173:
147:
78:
304:
264:
210:
195:
300:
296:
288:
191:
128:
299:. Finally, it seems unlikely that the bands you mention will get deleted given that they pass
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
260:
357:
256:
140:
132:
335:
70:
62:
136:
50:
108:
353:
369:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
139:. No notable label. No big tours. The article is full of
115:
104:
100:
96:
329:list of Living people-related deletion discussions
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
379:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
167:list of Music-related deletion discussions
327:: This debate has been included in the
165:: This debate has been included in the
143:. The genre's are even questionable.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
259:and eventually the page would be
1:
362:15:38, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
344:19:25, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
313:13:48, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
273:14:44, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
245:14:26, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
219:09:26, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
202:08:58, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
190:Labels aren't notable, fails
182:07:15, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
156:07:12, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
57:03:46, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
396:
372:Please do not modify it.
127:Non notable band. Fails
32:Please do not modify it.
293:non-notable by choice
44:The result was
346:
332:
248:
233:Grilledvegetables
231:comment added by
184:
170:
387:
374:
333:
323:
257:speedily deleted
247:
225:
171:
161:
118:
112:
94:
53:
34:
395:
394:
390:
389:
388:
386:
385:
384:
383:
377:deletion review
370:
226:
114:
85:
69:
66:
51:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
393:
391:
382:
381:
365:
364:
347:
321:
320:
319:
318:
317:
316:
315:
221:
204:
185:
174:Undead Warrior
148:Undead Warrior
125:
124:
71:Fall of Efrafa
65:
63:Fall of Efrafa
60:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
392:
380:
378:
373:
367:
366:
363:
359:
355:
351:
348:
345:
341:
337:
330:
326:
322:
314:
310:
306:
305:Blackmetalbaz
302:
298:
294:
290:
286:
283:
282:
279:
276:
275:
274:
270:
266:
265:Blackmetalbaz
262:
258:
253:
250:
249:
246:
242:
238:
234:
230:
222:
220:
216:
212:
211:Blackmetalbaz
208:
205:
203:
200:
197:
193:
189:
186:
183:
179:
175:
168:
164:
160:
159:
158:
157:
153:
149:
146:
142:
138:
134:
130:
122:
117:
110:
106:
102:
98:
93:
89:
84:
80:
76:
72:
68:
67:
64:
61:
59:
58:
55:
54:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
371:
368:
349:
324:
292:
284:
277:
251:
206:
187:
162:
144:
126:
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
227:—Preceding
336:Raven1977
301:WP:MUSIC
297:WP:CIVIL
289:WP:MUSIC
241:contribs
229:unsigned
192:WP:MUSIC
129:WP:MUSIC
121:View log
285:Comment
278:Comment
252:Comment
88:protect
83:history
52:MBisanz
354:Drmies
350:Delete
261:salted
207:Delete
188:Delete
145:Delete
135:, and
116:delete
92:delete
46:delete
133:WP:RS
119:) – (
109:views
101:watch
97:links
16:<
358:talk
340:talk
325:Note
309:talk
269:talk
237:talk
215:talk
178:talk
163:Note
152:talk
137:WP:N
105:logs
79:talk
75:edit
334:--
331:.
196:Mgm
172:--
169:.
360:)
342:)
311:)
271:)
243:)
239:•
217:)
180:)
154:)
141:OR
131:,
107:|
103:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
81:|
77:|
48:.
356:(
338:(
307:(
267:(
235:(
213:(
198:|
176:(
150:(
123:)
113:(
111:)
73:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.