386:. I note that the Japanese article, the one with a standing request to translate, has actual references, which is more than many ja.wiki articles. This creates the very strong presumption that reliable sources exist discussing this publisher term of art -- one that, because of adoption by English manga publishers is also becoming a term of art in the Anglosphere (though not as much as shounen or shoujo). â
245:
notice the request that more material be translated from the
Japanese article. There is no deadline for Knowledge articles, and given how much material is in the Japanese article, I'd say that's a good indication that this article needs more time to be translated. I could see it being renamed (based on the Japanese article),but not deleted. ···
244:
as the term is notable in Japan (though more for "kodomomuke anime" instead), and there are at least 19 different interwiki links to articles in other languages. While most of them are stubs, this lends itself to indicating the term is notable and worthy of an article. Also, you may apparently didn't
282:
Actually, the
Japanese article is about children's anime. And no, we aren't missing the point. The subject is notable in Japan, and therefore notable here, too. Notability does not disappear just because the language of the encyclopedia changes. As Farix indicated, the scope of the ENglish Knowledge
366:
If there are reliable source documenting the subject and the use of the term, then an article is fully warranted. Just because it is a non-English term or subject does not disqualify it for inclusion in
Knowledge. While this is an English language Knowledge, that does not mean that the scope of our
202:
By your definition Shonen and Shojo are not notable terms in english (within the anime fanbase yes but not in the wider language), you certainly won't find then in an english dictionary. The question is if they are notable enough within the context of having their own article - thats a completely
441:
on the evidence presented its a genre, and this is the recognized term for it. Though I do take Boffob's view into account. it seems reasonable to me that particularly stylized types of a national literature would have a distinctive name.
465:- my main issue is the lack of sources. How do we know it's a recognized term and that it's separate enough from other cultures to warrant being out of children's lit, or why this tiny amount of material coudln't be included in
423:
to discuss the name and concept of children literature in French speaking countries, and repeat the same for all cultures. The name changes depending on the language, but the subject is essentially the
294:
Erk, yeah, I knew that but forgot. My point still stands though. The
English article is not addressing the same subject matter as the Japanese one. Just like how the Japanese articles on
211:? Not notable words in the english language, but important in the context of anime and manga articles. As is common, my suggestion is to improve the article rather then delete it
122:
514:. Kodomo manga is an established style of manga, with differences vs. typical western kids' books and vs. adult manga, . The topic of the article is comparable to
180:
260:". There is a major difference is this specificity, and the article shows absolutely no reason to be split off from a more general article such as
58:
256:
You guys are missing the point. The
Japanese article is literally on "children's comics". The English article is on "children's comics
89:
84:
93:
17:
408:
420:
76:
544:
Well, kodomo and shoujo aren't genres, they're demographic labels -- descriptive of intended audience, not of content. â
129:
Kodomo manga/anime is not a notable term in
English. The article is a stubborn attempt to needlessly conform with the
310:. Your point is that the notability does not change with the language. This is true, but you're still supposed to
570:
36:
569:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
499:
404:
261:
142:
138:
553:
549:
535:
482:
453:
433:
395:
391:
378:
348:
334:
323:
289:
277:
251:
234:
220:
216:
192:
174:
154:
523:
328:
Okay, but that's a cleanup issue, not a reason for deletion. You're using the wrong forum here. ···
473:, if it's not all there already? There's not a single citation, thus no evidence of notability.--
374:
344:
319:
273:
265:
230:
188:
183:
the
Japanese Knowledge. And of course it's used in Japan, it's their translation of "children".--
150:
403:- no reliable source to establish notability, no reason given why this should be separate from
163:
Its unsourced, but on what basis do you say its not a term widely used in Japan for the genre?
49:
80:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
545:
478:
429:
387:
212:
531:
141:
of the rest of the world to merit a distinction. Suggest turning it into a redirect to
449:
369:
340:
329:
315:
284:
269:
246:
226:
184:
170:
146:
137:
articles. In reality, Japanese comics aimed at children aren't different enough from
515:
72:
64:
110:
474:
425:
527:
507:
307:
130:
444:
165:
134:
339:
Except the way to clean it up is to delete it, because it's redundant.--
511:
303:
204:
225:
By my basis "kodomo" isn't notable in the
English fanbase either.--
519:
503:
495:
470:
466:
416:
412:
299:
295:
208:
563:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
419:
articles). Might as well write an
English article titled
117:
106:
102:
98:
522:
doesn't have a list of genres, and a list or article
367:
topics are limited to just the
English language. --
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
573:). No further edits should be made to this page.
283:goes beyond topics covered in only English. ···
8:
411:articles (or not be simply included in the
518:. But what puzzles me most is that both
7:
421:Littérature d'enfance et de jeunesse
502:follows the same logic as deleting
24:
498:- suggesting deletion because of
302:are actually on the subjects of
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
554:21:42, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
536:14:51, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
483:15:02, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
454:23:34, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
434:18:13, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
396:18:03, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
379:17:54, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
349:19:31, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
335:18:39, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
324:18:28, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
290:18:01, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
278:17:43, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
252:16:59, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
235:17:43, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
221:16:54, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
193:17:43, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
175:16:52, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
155:16:01, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
59:19:12, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
409:Children's television series
203:different thing. What about
590:
566:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
264:(since we don't have a
500:Children's literature
405:Children's literature
314:the subject matter.--
262:Children's literature
143:Children's literature
139:children's literature
44:The result was
266:children's comics
581:
568:
526:does not exist.
332:
287:
249:
120:
114:
96:
56:
55:
34:
589:
588:
584:
583:
582:
580:
579:
578:
577:
571:deletion review
564:
524:genres of manga
330:
285:
247:
116:
87:
71:
68:
51:
50:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
587:
585:
576:
575:
559:
558:
557:
556:
539:
538:
488:
487:
486:
485:
457:
456:
436:
398:
381:
361:
360:
359:
358:
357:
356:
355:
354:
353:
352:
351:
239:
238:
237:
197:
196:
195:
127:
126:
67:
62:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
586:
574:
572:
567:
561:
560:
555:
551:
547:
543:
542:
541:
540:
537:
533:
529:
525:
521:
517:
513:
509:
506:because it's
505:
501:
497:
493:
490:
489:
484:
480:
476:
472:
468:
464:
461:
460:
459:
458:
455:
451:
447:
446:
440:
437:
435:
431:
427:
422:
418:
414:
410:
406:
402:
399:
397:
393:
389:
385:
382:
380:
376:
372:
371:
365:
362:
350:
346:
342:
338:
337:
336:
333:
327:
326:
325:
321:
317:
313:
309:
305:
301:
297:
293:
292:
291:
288:
281:
280:
279:
275:
271:
267:
263:
259:
255:
254:
253:
250:
243:
240:
236:
232:
228:
224:
223:
222:
218:
214:
210:
206:
201:
198:
194:
190:
186:
182:
178:
177:
176:
172:
168:
167:
162:
159:
158:
157:
156:
152:
148:
144:
140:
136:
132:
124:
119:
112:
108:
104:
100:
95:
91:
86:
82:
78:
74:
70:
69:
66:
63:
61:
60:
57:
54:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
565:
562:
516:Shoujo manga
491:
462:
443:
438:
400:
383:
368:
363:
311:
257:
241:
199:
164:
160:
128:
73:Kodomo manga
65:Kodomo manga
52:
45:
43:
31:
28:
546:Quasirandom
388:Quasirandom
268:article).--
242:Strong Keep
213:Dandy Sephy
53:L'Aquatique
508:literature
439:Weak keep
312:translate
308:animation
341:Remurmur
316:Remurmur
270:Remurmur
258:in Japan
227:Remurmur
185:Remurmur
161:Question
147:Remurmur
123:View log
463:Comment
424:same.--
364:Comment
90:protect
85:history
512:comics
475:Boffob
426:Boffob
401:Delete
304:comics
205:Seinen
131:shÅnen
118:delete
94:delete
528:MaxVT
520:manga
504:manga
496:Manga
494:into
492:Merge
471:anime
467:manga
417:anime
413:manga
370:Farix
300:anime
296:manga
209:Josei
181:isn't
179:This
135:shÅjo
121:) â (
111:views
103:watch
99:links
16:<
550:talk
532:talk
479:talk
469:and
450:talk
430:talk
415:and
407:and
392:talk
384:Keep
375:Talk
345:talk
320:talk
306:and
298:and
274:talk
231:talk
217:talk
200:Keep
189:talk
171:talk
151:talk
133:and
107:logs
81:talk
77:edit
46:keep
510:or
445:DGG
331:æ¥æ¬ç©£
286:æ¥æ¬ç©£
248:æ¥æ¬ç©£
207:or
166:DGG
552:)
534:)
481:)
452:)
432:)
394:)
377:)
347:)
322:)
276:)
233:)
219:)
191:)
173:)
153:)
145:.
109:|
105:|
101:|
97:|
92:|
88:|
83:|
79:|
48:.
548:(
530:(
477:(
448:(
428:(
390:(
373:(
343:(
318:(
272:(
229:(
215:(
187:(
169:(
149:(
125:)
115:(
113:)
75:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.