Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Hashgraph (2nd nomination) - Knowledge

Source 📝

382:
It's always difficult to subtract the promo features and "we love all things CC" gush articles from these topics, but overall I think this is sufficient sourcing. (Most of the current refs are 2018+ and didn't play a role in the previous AfD)
218: 476: 86: 362: 416: 286: 306: 179: 326: 266: 212: 491: 126: 426: 111: 249:
notability not established, no in-depth coverage by reputable media exists. See also arguments on previous AfD (result: delete), which are still valid.
81: 445: 358: 508:
Forbes is hit and miss (depends on the contributor - they do a lot of paid promo features), and CoinDesk we have down as "generally unreliable". --
494:. I don't really know VentureBeat but it looks like a blog to me. It focuses on "transformative" tech so it possibly not very critical at all. -- 455: 464: 354: 417:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/jeffkauflin/2018/03/13/hedera-hashgraph-thinks-it-can-one-up-bitcoin-and-ethereum-with-faster-transactions/
480: 559: 106: 99: 17: 566: 525: 503: 484: 400: 374: 338: 318: 298: 278: 258: 66: 520: 395: 152: 147: 436: 233: 156: 427:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/jeffersonnunn/2018/11/26/hedera-hashgraph-enterprise-grade-distributed-ledger-technology/
370: 200: 120: 116: 139: 446:
https://venturebeat.com/2018/08/01/hedera-hashgraph-raises-100-million-for-fast-and-secure-blockchain-alternative/
583: 40: 456:
https://venturebeat.com/2018/08/04/how-hedera-hashgraph-is-building-a-fast-and-secure-blockchain-alternative/
537:: The sources in the article (except for Forbes and CoinDesk) are reliable, including the ones indicated by 465:
https://www.coindesk.com/university-college-london-joins-hedera-hashgraph-as-council-member-research-partner
194: 538: 366: 579: 36: 190: 555: 472: 226: 499: 334: 314: 294: 274: 254: 240: 62: 516: 391: 95: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
578:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
547: 206: 143: 54: 437:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbesdigitalassets/2019/09/26/hedera-hashgraph-explored/
542: 495: 330: 310: 290: 270: 250: 58: 510: 385: 350: 173: 451: 442: 353:
that have appeared since the last deletion, and that establish notability, i.e.
135: 72: 461: 432: 422: 413: 574:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
349:, although poorly written, there appear to be several new 169: 165: 161: 225: 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 586:). No further edits should be made to this page. 541:. That said, the article is good enough to pass 325:Note: This discussion has been included in the 305:Note: This discussion has been included in the 285:Note: This discussion has been included in the 265:Note: This discussion has been included in the 87:Articles for deletion/Hashgraph (2nd nomination) 287:list of Technology-related deletion discussions 490:Forbes and CoinDesk are both bad sources, see 307:list of Computing-related deletion discussions 327:list of Internet-related deletion discussions 267:list of Business-related deletion discussions 239: 8: 492:Knowledge:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources 127:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 470: 324: 304: 284: 264: 469:~ Random internet user on 6 Mar 2021. 79: 7: 477:2601:602:8A00:D70:20C3:612:AD35:1B82 24: 112:Introduction to deletion process 82:Articles for deletion/Hashgraph 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 102:(AfD)? Read these primers! 603: 67:16:34, 12 March 2021 (UTC) 567:15:45, 8 March 2021 (UTC) 526:00:12, 8 March 2021 (UTC) 504:23:27, 7 March 2021 (UTC) 485:05:09, 7 March 2021 (UTC) 401:18:39, 6 March 2021 (UTC) 375:14:21, 6 March 2021 (UTC) 339:20:50, 5 March 2021 (UTC) 319:20:50, 5 March 2021 (UTC) 299:20:50, 5 March 2021 (UTC) 279:20:50, 5 March 2021 (UTC) 259:20:50, 5 March 2021 (UTC) 576:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 78:AfDs for this article: 100:Articles for deletion 55:(non-admin closure) 539:SailingInABathTub 524: 487: 475:comment added by 399: 367:SailingInABathTub 341: 321: 301: 281: 117:Guide to deletion 107:How to contribute 57: 594: 565: 563: 550: 514: 513: 407:Reputable media? 389: 388: 244: 243: 229: 177: 159: 97: 53: 34: 602: 601: 597: 596: 595: 593: 592: 591: 590: 584:deletion review 564: 553: 548: 546: 509: 384: 186: 150: 134: 131: 94: 91: 76: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 600: 598: 589: 588: 570: 569: 552: 531: 530: 529: 528: 506: 467: 458: 448: 439: 429: 419: 409: 408: 404: 403: 377: 343: 342: 322: 302: 282: 247: 246: 183: 130: 129: 124: 114: 109: 92: 90: 89: 84: 77: 75: 70: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 599: 587: 585: 581: 577: 572: 571: 568: 561: 557: 551: 544: 540: 536: 533: 532: 527: 522: 518: 512: 507: 505: 501: 497: 493: 489: 488: 486: 482: 478: 474: 468: 466: 463: 459: 457: 453: 449: 447: 444: 440: 438: 434: 430: 428: 424: 420: 418: 415: 411: 410: 406: 405: 402: 397: 393: 387: 381: 378: 376: 372: 368: 364: 360: 356: 352: 348: 345: 344: 340: 336: 332: 328: 323: 320: 316: 312: 308: 303: 300: 296: 292: 288: 283: 280: 276: 272: 268: 263: 262: 261: 260: 256: 252: 242: 238: 235: 232: 228: 224: 220: 217: 214: 211: 208: 205: 202: 199: 196: 192: 189: 188:Find sources: 184: 181: 175: 171: 167: 163: 158: 154: 149: 145: 141: 137: 133: 132: 128: 125: 122: 118: 115: 113: 110: 108: 105: 104: 103: 101: 96: 88: 85: 83: 80: 74: 71: 69: 68: 64: 60: 56: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 575: 573: 534: 471:— Preceding 379: 346: 248: 236: 230: 222: 215: 209: 203: 197: 187: 93: 49: 47: 31: 28: 452:VentureBeat 443:VentureBeat 213:free images 435:yet again 580:talk page 380:Weak keep 136:Hashgraph 73:Hashgraph 50:withdrawn 37:talk page 582:or in a 560:ICE CUBE 521:contribs 496:Ysangkok 473:unsigned 462:CoinDesk 460:Here is 450:Here is 441:Here is 431:Here is 421:Here is 412:Here is 396:contribs 361:, & 331:Ysangkok 311:Ysangkok 291:Ysangkok 271:Ysangkok 251:Ysangkok 180:View log 121:glossary 59:Ysangkok 39:or in a 549:ASTIG😎 511:Elmidae 386:Elmidae 219:WP refs 207:scholar 153:protect 148:history 98:New to 543:WP:GNG 454:again 433:Forbes 425:again 423:Forbes 414:Forbes 191:Google 157:delete 556:ICE T 351:WP:RS 234:JSTOR 195:books 174:views 166:watch 162:links 16:< 535:Keep 517:talk 500:talk 481:talk 392:talk 371:talk 347:Keep 335:talk 315:talk 295:talk 275:talk 255:talk 227:FENS 201:news 170:logs 144:talk 140:edit 63:talk 241:TWL 178:– ( 558:• 545:. 519:· 502:) 483:) 394:· 383:-- 373:) 365:. 357:, 337:) 329:. 317:) 309:. 297:) 289:. 277:) 269:. 257:) 221:) 172:| 168:| 164:| 160:| 155:| 151:| 146:| 142:| 65:) 52:. 562:) 554:( 523:) 515:( 498:( 479:( 398:) 390:( 369:( 363:3 359:2 355:1 333:( 313:( 293:( 273:( 253:( 245:) 237:· 231:· 223:· 216:· 210:· 204:· 198:· 193:( 185:( 182:) 176:) 138:( 123:) 119:( 61:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
(non-admin closure)
Ysangkok
talk
16:34, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Hashgraph
Articles for deletion/Hashgraph
Articles for deletion/Hashgraph (2nd nomination)

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
Hashgraph
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Google
books

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.