420:
American copyright law does not recognize database rights, therefore neither do we at en-wiki. Systems such as this would not be copyrightable, but instead fall under patent law protection or maybe trademark (if anything). Further, this system was first published in 1927, and was not a "commercial
271:. This is obviously part of a notable topic with an obvious parent article. Analyzing it as if it wasn't doesn't help us figure out what to do with it, if anything. Can you discuss it in terms of its informational value for our coverage of the RAL standard, and/or address
405:
NB - this is without prejudice to the ongoing sockpuppet investigation of the article's author. I don't hold with deleting valuable articles just because they're the creation of a banned sockmaster, but there is a rights issue here that we still have to observe.
421:
list" but instead the creation of the German government (for public use as a universal standard, no less). So even if otherwise copyrightable under German law, it would be in the public domain under either of those grounds.
166:
160:
303:
119:
323:
126:
92:
87:
96:
79:
181:
148:
17:
439:
I agree that the US doesn't recognise this, but as the country of origin does, don't we have to be precautionary anyway.
142:
489:
40:
466:
448:
434:
415:
386:
355:
335:
315:
292:
258:
240:
214:
61:
138:
83:
444:
411:
188:
485:
57:
36:
246:
198:
174:
276:
236:
224:
202:
75:
67:
154:
461:
440:
429:
407:
351:
331:
311:
287:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
484:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
364:
53:
272:
397:
268:
254:
232:
210:
396:
as potential copyvio. I'm concerned that this list falls under the EU concept of a
455:
423:
347:
327:
307:
281:
113:
264:
363:
Is the nominator suggesting a merge discussion instead of a delete discussion?
250:
206:
205:
is sufficient to cover this standard without adding additional articles.
249:- you keep picking up on secondary issues and ignoring the primary one.
223:
Procedural - If it is sufficient to have the content in one article (
52:. Merge discussion should be initiated at the article's talk page —
478:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
109:
105:
101:
400:, for what is a commercial list and protected as such.
173:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
492:). No further edits should be made to this page.
304:list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions
187:
8:
322:Note: This debate has been included in the
302:Note: This debate has been included in the
324:list of Lists-related deletion discussions
321:
301:
201:. A list of colours. Disputed prod. The
7:
24:
453:No it doesn't, and no we don't.
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
245:You still have not addressed
509:
481:Please do not modify it.
467:13:43, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
449:09:54, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
435:16:37, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
416:16:21, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
387:00:10, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
356:18:58, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
346:, no case for deletion.
336:18:30, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
316:18:30, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
293:18:53, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
259:16:42, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
241:16:37, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
215:16:17, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
62:07:53, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
225:RAL color standard
203:RAL color standard
76:List of RAL colors
68:List of RAL colors
48:The result was
338:
318:
267:and raise you an
197:no indication of
500:
483:
383:
380:
377:
374:
371:
368:
192:
191:
177:
129:
117:
99:
34:
508:
507:
503:
502:
501:
499:
498:
497:
496:
490:deletion review
479:
381:
378:
375:
372:
369:
366:
227:) then use the
134:
125:
90:
74:
71:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
506:
504:
495:
494:
475:
474:
473:
472:
471:
470:
469:
402:
401:
398:database right
390:
389:
358:
340:
339:
319:
299:
298:
297:
296:
295:
263:I'll see your
195:
194:
131:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
505:
493:
491:
487:
482:
476:
468:
464:
463:
458:
457:
452:
451:
450:
446:
442:
438:
437:
436:
432:
431:
426:
425:
419:
418:
417:
413:
409:
404:
403:
399:
395:
392:
391:
388:
385:
384:
362:
359:
357:
353:
349:
345:
344:Keep or Merge
342:
341:
337:
333:
329:
325:
320:
317:
313:
309:
305:
300:
294:
290:
289:
284:
283:
278:
274:
270:
266:
262:
261:
260:
256:
252:
248:
247:WP:notability
244:
243:
242:
238:
234:
230:
226:
222:
221:strong oppose
219:
218:
217:
216:
212:
208:
204:
200:
199:WP:notability
190:
186:
183:
180:
176:
172:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
140:
137:
136:Find sources:
132:
128:
124:
121:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
480:
477:
460:
454:
441:Andy Dingley
428:
422:
408:Andy Dingley
393:
365:
360:
343:
286:
280:
228:
220:
196:
184:
178:
170:
163:
157:
151:
145:
135:
122:
49:
47:
31:
28:
277:WP:LISTPURP
161:free images
54:Crisco 1492
486:talk page
328:• Gene93k
308:• Gene93k
231:process.
37:talk page
488:or in a
273:WP:SPLIT
233:HSRtrack
120:View log
39:or in a
456:postdlf
424:postdlf
348:Johnbod
282:postdlf
167:WP refs
155:scholar
93:protect
88:history
394:delete
269:WP:ATD
139:Google
97:delete
382:Focus
229:merge
182:JSTOR
143:books
127:Stats
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
462:talk
445:talk
430:talk
412:talk
361:Keep
352:talk
332:talk
312:talk
288:talk
265:WP:N
255:talk
237:talk
211:talk
175:FENS
149:news
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
58:talk
50:keep
275:or
251:noq
207:noq
189:TWL
118:– (
465:)
447:)
433:)
414:)
354:)
334:)
326:.
314:)
306:.
291:)
279:?
257:)
239:)
213:)
169:)
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
60:)
459:(
443:(
427:(
410:(
379:m
376:a
373:e
370:r
367:D
350:(
330:(
310:(
285:(
253:(
235:(
209:(
193:)
185:·
179:·
171:·
164:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
141:(
133:(
130:)
123:·
116:)
78:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.