80:, no changes have been made to address these problems. The article continues to be an indiscriminate collection of whatever editors have decided are clichés without any references or rules for inclusion. It's listcruft.
141:
with discussions of whatever critics/reviewers have noted as "cliché" in animation history. But this article is a dumping ground of personal observations in animation without a
283:
269:
244:
226:
206:
194:
166:
154:
129:
111:
98:
52:
119:-- I like lists, I like them alot. In fact, I would go so far... actually, not here I wouldn't. Even I admit they have no place on Knowledge (XXG).
91:
17:
126:
137:
per WP:OR. I am not opposed to cliché articles on here so long as they are cited as such. A better article would be something like
265:
298:
36:
77:
297:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
58:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
86:
203:
123:
138:
150:
202:
as OR, and the lack of sources has led, as Epopt said, to a lot of examples that are pure hooey.
81:
49:
108:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
73:
120:
69:
223:
257:
219:
215:
175:
142:
65:
163:
146:
253:
188:
162:
as indiscrimate original research (and not a few instances of complete bollocks)
261:
235:
280:
180:
70:
Knowledge (XXG) is not an indiscriminate collection of information
291:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
301:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
68:. Despite a previous AfD in May that cited
252:for the cliché justification that this is
72:and voiced concerns about problems with
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
64:The entirety of this article is
1:
284:10:22, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
270:03:35, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
245:02:58, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
227:00:00, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
207:21:41, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
195:21:08, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
167:21:06, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
155:20:54, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
130:20:44, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
112:20:41, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
99:20:27, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
53:06:35, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
318:
76:, original reasearch, and
59:List of animation clichés
294:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
107:per all of the above
145:to save it's life. —
258:original research
176:original research
139:animation clichés
66:original research
309:
296:
242:
191:
183:
94:
89:
34:
317:
316:
312:
311:
310:
308:
307:
306:
305:
299:deletion review
292:
268:
236:
189:
187:
181:
153:
143:reliable source
96:
92:
87:
62:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
315:
313:
304:
303:
287:
286:
273:
272:
264:
247:
229:
209:
197:
185:
169:
157:
149:
132:
114:
85:
82:Chris Griswold
61:
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
314:
302:
300:
295:
289:
288:
285:
282:
278:
275:
274:
271:
267:
263:
259:
255:
251:
248:
246:
243:
241:
240:
234:per above. --
233:
230:
228:
225:
221:
217:
213:
210:
208:
205:
204:Andrew Levine
201:
198:
196:
193:
192:
184:
177:
173:
170:
168:
165:
161:
158:
156:
152:
148:
144:
140:
136:
133:
131:
128:
125:
122:
118:
115:
113:
110:
106:
103:
102:
101:
100:
95:
90:
83:
79:
78:verifiability
75:
71:
67:
60:
57:
55:
54:
51:
50:Mailer Diablo
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
293:
290:
276:
249:
238:
237:
231:
211:
199:
179:
171:
159:
134:
116:
109:QuiteUnusual
104:
63:
45:
43:
31:
28:
279:per nom.
254:unverified
224:Hello32020
164:➥the Epopt
147:Mitaphane
277:Delete
262:danntm
250:Delete
239:Kf4bdy
232:Delete
212:Delete
200:Delete
172:Delete
160:Delete
135:Delete
117:Delete
105:Delete
46:delete
281:Anomo
220:WP:RS
216:WP:OR
190:talk?
121:Bubba
16:<
260:.--
256:and
214:per
151:talk
74:NPOV
48:. -
182:TBC
178:.--
174:as
124:hot
222:.
218:;
127:ep
97:)
266:C
186:Φ
93:☓
88:☎
84:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.