431:- I agree the article would contain too many entries; although I really do disagree with your harsh and unrealistic interpretation Reywas92, the list of criteria was added because of the policy guidelines on how to write an introduction for an article, and by following the guidelines only; all the words within the introduction relevant to defining entries for the subject discovery are true of discovery, by following only dictionary definitions of the word discovery, how exactly in any reality is it possible your position on the irrelevancy of things has a grounding in reality. I'm sure you are expressing your preference for inclusion, not maintaining your commitment to the principle of neutrality; these things simply are discoveries: "Finding "hidden marks" in a painting is hardly a discovery. Performing an autopsy on Whitney Houston and "discovering" she used a lot of drugs is not a discovery. Capturing a fugitive is not a discovery. Finding that "f---" was used back in 1310 is not a discovery." Like a child, or adult, who imagines the world must sensibly be a reality, and presented with a new set of informations which contradict that world view, reality, the mind of the child or adult, will not accept the contradiction, refutes the truth, the evidence which is real; given the factors to use to provide an argument, you literally attempt to
440:) of electricity used on pieces of grave robbed corpses, into a living thing. If I don't like the existing reality, similarly to your dislike, the difference between our positions on the unacceptableness of the truth presented to us both is your commitment to insanity as reality; if you find anywhere in sources, that science flinches then refuses to show findings, and hides the things found from sight, to make ignorance of intelligence for us all. If I'm wrong to think you really believe your own argument is true Reywas92, surely it is better to see h
599:
579:
445:
595:
540:
567:
380:
Overly broad and indiscriminate, we don't need to combine the "notions of contrive, conceive of, design, detection, develop devise, discernment, to find, identification, invention, locating and location of, origination, pioneer, realization unearthing" into one article. Some should be moved to the
413:
as irredeemably, impossibly, irresponsibly indiscriminate. There are a gazillion "discoveries" as defined by this list. (Also, "writings", "history of art", etc. are not "science".) I'm also going to nominate the various List of inventions and discoveries for the same reason.
401:. Finding "hidden marks" in a painting is hardly a discovery. Performing an autopsy on Whitney Houston and "discovering" she used a lot of drugs is not a discovery. Capturing a fugitive is not a discovery. Finding that "f---" was used back in 1310 is not a discovery.
206:
268:
where each subfields have their own, more manageable list. Possibly making listing existing timelines and outlines and expanding those. Possibly having dedicated list of discoveries per each field. Possibly outright deletion.
435:
like the charges (brought against me also; like I have attempted to commit a crime with my allegiance to the development of the defined subject of the article, and so therefore my execution, as if I am some kind of
237:
I'm not necessarily advocating deletion outright, but this list is... too large in scope. I cannot fathom that someone looking for discoveries in biology would simultaneously be interested in
Fugitives being found.
724:
571:
200:
132:
127:
749:
the list is impressive in its scope, and useful in theory, but completely overwhelming in its current incarnation. Personally- I would love to see this split up by general topic.
566:
really I don't mean any offense at all to you, really I don't, but; I'm sure I didn't think being too voluminous with my opinion within a response amounts to shouting; I'm sure
136:
594:(both went up, really I hope they both go back down again, for us both, otherwise there isn't 27 notches of anything to down, at all, that I could see, that is; i.e. it is your
159:
119:
583:
539:
is now showing a response specificaly to 17:45, 16 January 2020 (UTC) "..converting this into a list of lists where each subfields have their own more manageable list.."" (
715:
It is basically impossible to formulate anything like sensible criteria for inclusion in a list like this. The list title is almost synonymous with "list of known facts".
575:
653:
on the 1st page), paleontology (shows 18 returns with partial matches for years in the period 2014 to 2020 (with the same titles description as found @ paleobotany)
323:
166:
357:
394:
106:
91:
729:
I-! (i.e. I disclaim) the article, from the position of the principal contributing editor, so it's just fine for the discussion to conclude with delete
591:
477:), in the disagreement between us both; you see you have won, but there is no 1 possible Reywas92, only us 2 Reywas92, if my mind should follow you
390:
221:
188:
257:, etc... and the article suffers from massive bloat for many things that made a fart in the popular press, but which are otherwise routine.
758:
738:
699:
662:
630:
615:
552:
529:
486:
467:
423:
405:
386:
382:
369:
349:
315:
61:
182:
398:
587:
241:
The organization is nearly impossible to make sense of, referencing is completely chaotic, there are considerable overlaps with
178:
86:
79:
17:
516:
336:
302:
279:
123:
228:
115:
67:
100:
96:
775:
592:
https://vovworld.vn/en-US/news/vietnam-jumps-27-notches-in-un-competitive-industrial-performance-index-795173.vov
40:
194:
265:
734:
695:
658:
611:
548:
482:
463:
754:
419:
771:
720:
36:
650:
646:
642:
638:
365:
214:
57:
730:
691:
654:
607:
544:
512:
501:
478:
459:
332:
298:
275:
246:
242:
750:
415:
254:
250:
75:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
770:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
588:
https://www.strategeast.org/armenia-jumps-27-notches-up-in-the-legatum-prosperity-index-2019/
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
716:
687:
524:
344:
310:
287:
450:
520:
361:
340:
306:
283:
53:
537:
https://en.wikipedia.org/User:Diametakomisi/sandbox#List_of_discoveries_in_archaeology
674:
561:
508:
402:
328:
294:
271:
261:
432:
153:
683:
634:
536:
474:
437:
603:
506:
Stick to the issues and dial the drama down by 27 notches mmkay?
458:
ancing an argument amongst all of us, being interested editors
766:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
473:
it is not a secret, that it is not possible to make 1 from 2 (
688:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Special:Contributions/Diametakomisi
260:
I'm not really sure what to do with this, but I'm leaning
633:
already covers the subject of "discoveries in medicine",
679:
149:
145:
141:
582:
in my response to Reywas92; it's just that I did feel
213:
570:is infact not keeping to the issues; I think it's
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
778:). No further edits should be made to this page.
586:by the lack of sympathy in Reywas92's reponse);
356:Note: This discussion has been included in the
322:Note: This discussion has been included in the
381:linked main articles including those above and
227:
8:
324:list of Science-related deletion discussions
107:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
475:https://www.thefreedictionary.com/cretinous
395:Timeline of fundamental physics discoveries
358:list of Lists-related deletion discussions
355:
321:
629:should be divided to separate articles;
391:Timeline of chemical element discoveries
541:and does not include any drama showing
665:(1 minor correction after signature)
470:(minor changes made after signature)
433:give breath to a monstrous conclusion
7:
690:i.e. see "N", mindblowingly yours,
635:returns of List of discoveries in-
631:List of drugs by year of discovery
387:Timeline of scientific discoveries
383:List of drugs by year of discovery
116:List of discoveries by disciplines
68:List of discoveries by disciplines
24:
399:Timeline of particle discoveries
92:Introduction to deletion process
578:headbomb that you see anything
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
741:(minor change after signature)
292:17:45, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
1:
264:, and converting this into a
759:22:05, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
739:18:20, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
725:17:35, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
700:19:04, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
663:18:14, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
616:17:13, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
553:17:13, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
530:15:22, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
487:14:29, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
468:14:09, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
424:20:01, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
406:19:51, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
370:17:49, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
350:17:45, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
316:17:45, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
62:02:51, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
454:), rather than a value for
82:(AfD)? Read these primers!
795:
255:List of timelines#Physics
251:List of timelines#Biology
768:Please do not modify it.
448:(and this additionally:
32:Please do not modify it.
444:in the advocate of the
686:, not shouting) thus:
580:(explosively) dramatic
637:paleobotany includes
80:Articles for deletion
438:authoritorian regime
651:2020 in paleobotany
647:2019 in paleobotany
643:2018 in paleobotany
639:2017 in paleobotany
584:somewhat terrorised
247:Outline of physics
243:Outline of biology
372:
352:
97:Guide to deletion
87:How to contribute
786:
678:
565:
528:
505:
348:
314:
291:
249:, combined with
232:
231:
217:
169:
157:
139:
77:
34:
794:
793:
789:
788:
787:
785:
784:
783:
782:
776:deletion review
672:
604:no pun intended
559:
507:
499:
451:devils advocate
446:devils advocate
327:
293:
270:
174:
165:
130:
114:
111:
74:
71:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
792:
790:
781:
780:
762:
761:
743:
742:
727:
709:
708:
707:
706:
705:
704:
703:
702:
624:
623:
622:
621:
620:
619:
618:
534:
533:
532:
492:
491:
490:
489:
426:
408:
374:
373:
353:
235:
234:
171:
110:
109:
104:
94:
89:
72:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
791:
779:
777:
773:
769:
764:
763:
760:
756:
752:
748:
745:
744:
740:
736:
732:
731:Diametakomisi
728:
726:
722:
718:
714:
711:
710:
701:
697:
693:
692:Diametakomisi
689:
685:
681:
676:
671:
670:
669:
668:
667:
666:
664:
660:
656:
655:Diametakomisi
652:
648:
644:
640:
636:
632:
628:
625:
617:
613:
609:
608:Diametakomisi
605:
601:
597:
593:
589:
585:
581:
577:
573:
569:
563:
558:
557:
556:
555:
554:
550:
546:
545:Diametakomisi
542:
538:
535:
531:
526:
522:
518:
514:
510:
503:
502:Diametakomisi
498:
497:
496:
495:
494:
493:
488:
484:
480:
479:Diametakomisi
476:
472:
471:
469:
465:
461:
460:Diametakomisi
457:
453:
452:
447:
443:
439:
434:
430:
427:
425:
421:
417:
412:
409:
407:
404:
400:
396:
392:
388:
384:
379:
376:
375:
371:
367:
363:
359:
354:
351:
346:
342:
338:
334:
330:
325:
320:
319:
318:
317:
312:
308:
304:
300:
296:
289:
285:
281:
277:
273:
267:
266:list of lists
263:
258:
256:
252:
248:
244:
239:
230:
226:
223:
220:
216:
212:
208:
205:
202:
199:
196:
193:
190:
187:
184:
180:
177:
176:Find sources:
172:
168:
164:
161:
155:
151:
147:
143:
138:
134:
129:
125:
121:
117:
113:
112:
108:
105:
102:
98:
95:
93:
90:
88:
85:
84:
83:
81:
76:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
767:
765:
751:Nightenbelle
746:
712:
626:
568:"27 notches"
455:
449:
441:
429:Merge/Delete
428:
416:Clarityfiend
410:
377:
259:
240:
236:
224:
218:
210:
203:
197:
191:
185:
175:
162:
73:
49:
47:
31:
28:
684:Derangement
201:free images
717:XOR'easter
572:projection
772:talk page
576:your part
362:Shellwood
262:WP:TNTing
54:Barkeep49
37:talk page
774:or in a
675:Headbomb
562:Headbomb
509:Headbomb
403:Reywas92
329:Headbomb
295:Headbomb
272:Headbomb
160:View log
101:glossary
39:or in a
207:WP refs
195:scholar
133:protect
128:history
78:New to
747:Divide
713:Delete
682:(viz.
627:Divide
411:Delete
179:Google
137:delete
50:delete
222:JSTOR
183:books
167:Stats
154:views
146:watch
142:links
16:<
755:talk
735:talk
721:talk
696:talk
659:talk
612:talk
600:mine
598:not
549:talk
543:)
483:talk
464:talk
420:talk
366:talk
215:FENS
189:news
150:logs
124:talk
120:edit
58:talk
606:)
596:bad
574:on
456:adv
442:ate
378:TNT
326:.
229:TWL
158:– (
757:)
737:)
723:)
698:)
661:)
649:,
645:,
641:,
614:)
590:,
551:)
523:·
519:·
515:·
485:)
466:)
422:)
397:,
393:,
389:,
385:,
368:)
360:.
343:·
339:·
335:·
309:·
305:·
301:·
286:·
282:·
278:·
253:,
245:,
209:)
152:|
148:|
144:|
140:|
135:|
131:|
126:|
122:|
60:)
52:.
753:(
733:(
719:(
694:(
680:!
677::
673:@
657:(
610:(
602:(
564::
560:@
547:(
527:}
525:b
521:p
517:c
513:t
511:{
504::
500:@
481:(
462:(
418:(
364:(
347:}
345:b
341:p
337:c
333:t
331:{
313:}
311:b
307:p
303:c
299:t
297:{
290:}
288:b
284:p
280:c
276:t
274:{
233:)
225:·
219:·
211:·
204:·
198:·
192:·
186:·
181:(
173:(
170:)
163:·
156:)
118:(
103:)
99:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.