Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/List of international cricket five-wicket hauls at the Riverside Ground - Knowledge

Source šŸ“

784:- no valid deletion nomination given. "One article of this type was deleted therefore they must all go" is a completely invalid argument. Discussion should take place at an appropriate location as to whether all/only some/none of these articles are valid for WP before any further half-cocked AfDs are started.... -- 722:
So are you trying to say I am using sock puppets? And you have no right to call that niche considering there are dozens of articles like this (some FA). The only difference is that it has a underdeveloped lead unlike most of them, which, with enough time given, could be made better. After all, my
239: 802: 870:
The stadium article should contain a paragraph summarizing these lists and should have a link to the article about 5 wicket hauls. The readers of the stadium article would most likely also be interested in reading these records. I also note it is FL. (I also agree with what
207: 598:
and messages they left on various user talk pages. They've also created three articles on exactly the same theme in the last 24 hours. It's not a great leap of imagination to arrive at a conclusion that they picked a featured list to AfD to prove some kind of point.
133: 128: 137: 120: 124: 201: 116: 68: 391: 444:
for now, it should be deleted. It is unfair to keep some of them while deleting others. A clear concensus should be made in WikiProject Cricket for consistent guidelines and to avoid further dilemmas.
723:
main purpose of creating it in the first place was to have FA list. I felt that it had the potential since other ones have been as well. Otherwise, you have valid points and I would suggest MULTIAFD.
167: 893: 844: 814: 793: 770: 741: 700: 632: 608: 578: 541: 520: 493: 462: 428: 403: 375: 356: 337: 317: 295: 260: 62: 222: 189: 624:, which had already been deleted via AfD. There is no valid reason in the deletion rationale of this nomination, and further more, the article in question is a Featured List. 279: 160: 419:
and in various other places you seem to be arguing that lists of fifers are notable and should not be deleted. So why have you nominated this one for deletion.....? --
183: 179: 345: 305: 364: 229: 325: 621: 107: 92: 195: 659: 595: 58: 653: 87: 80: 17: 688:
has contested the deletion on the talkpage of the M. A. Aziz Stadium article, after being missing on WP for the best part of
810: 604: 101: 97: 910: 867: 40: 839: 736: 573: 515: 488: 457: 255: 821: 806: 677: 600: 789: 530: 424: 906: 884: 665: 36: 287: 271: 240:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/List of international cricket five-wicket hauls at M. A. Aziz Stadium
878: 827: 724: 647: 561: 503: 476: 445: 410: 243: 215: 557: 387: 333: 313: 275: 803:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/List of international cricket five-wicket hauls at Basin Reserve
692:. What are the chances of this editor coming out of retirement to save this very niche article? 502:
Not to mention, creators' work should not be overlooked. All of them should get fair treatment.
872: 863: 859: 855: 785: 551: 439: 420: 368: 349: 76: 53: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
905:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
399: 617: 283: 642: 390:. There is also an entire category of similar articles that may need to be addressed: 329: 309: 764: 717: 694: 626: 535: 154: 801:- over 100 such articles have been bundled for deletion by the same nominator at 594:- this nomination strikes me as curious given the comments the nominator made at 395: 386:
as per the nomination and outcome of the similar AfD mentioned. This is
471:
We either keep all or delete all, or have something in the middle like
117:
List of international cricket five-wicket hauls at the Riverside Ground
69:
List of international cricket five-wicket hauls at the Riverside Ground
392:
Category:Lists of international cricket five-wicket hauls by ground
901:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
826:
I had to do this. Hopefully everything will be resolvedĀ :)
683: 671: 416: 150: 146: 142: 214: 868:
Knowledge:Content_forking#Acceptable_types_of_forking
862:, I consider this article a logical and acceptable 805:. The list of bundled articles include this one... 280:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Log/2019 January 17
43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 913:). No further edits should be made to this page. 363:Note: This discussion has been included in the 344:Note: This discussion has been included in the 324:Note: This discussion has been included in the 304:Note: This discussion has been included in the 228: 8: 346:list of England-related deletion discussions 306:list of Cricket-related deletion discussions 108:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 365:list of Sports-related deletion discussions 858:. I don't consider this as a violation of 362: 343: 326:list of Lists-related deletion discussions 323: 303: 620:Y nomination, after the nom re-created 7: 596:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Cricket 24: 93:Introduction to deletion process 758:No, I'm just pointing out this 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 854:I am coming to this AfD from 475:number of fifers per ground. 278:). I have transcluded it to 894:22:50, 21 January 2019 (UTC) 845:19:00, 18 January 2019 (UTC) 815:18:55, 18 January 2019 (UTC) 794:09:42, 18 January 2019 (UTC) 771:15:54, 18 January 2019 (UTC) 742:15:51, 18 January 2019 (UTC) 701:09:13, 18 January 2019 (UTC) 633:09:08, 18 January 2019 (UTC) 609:22:09, 17 January 2019 (UTC) 579:21:56, 17 January 2019 (UTC) 542:09:13, 18 January 2019 (UTC) 521:21:49, 17 January 2019 (UTC) 494:21:47, 17 January 2019 (UTC) 463:21:44, 17 January 2019 (UTC) 429:21:39, 17 January 2019 (UTC) 404:21:22, 17 January 2019 (UTC) 376:20:23, 17 January 2019 (UTC) 357:20:23, 17 January 2019 (UTC) 338:19:39, 17 January 2019 (UTC) 318:19:39, 17 January 2019 (UTC) 296:19:30, 17 January 2019 (UTC) 261:19:17, 17 January 2019 (UTC) 63:22:32, 24 January 2019 (UTC) 270:This AfD was not correctly 83:(AfD)? Read these primers! 930: 903:Please do not modify it. 556:I think it's best to do 415:I am utterly confused. 32:Please do not modify it. 242:this must be removed. 81:Articles for deletion 616:This seems to be a 268:Automated comment: 873:User:ChrisTheDude 822:Blue Square Thing 807:Blue Square Thing 601:Blue Square Thing 378: 359: 340: 320: 298: 294: 98:Guide to deletion 88:How to contribute 921: 891: 888: 882: 842: 836: 831: 825: 767: 739: 733: 728: 721: 697: 687: 660:deletedĀ contribs 629: 576: 570: 565: 555: 538: 518: 512: 507: 491: 485: 480: 460: 454: 449: 443: 414: 373: 354: 290: 289:Talk to my owner 285: 266: 258: 252: 247: 233: 232: 218: 170: 158: 140: 78: 34: 929: 928: 924: 923: 922: 920: 919: 918: 917: 911:deletion review 886: 880: 877: 840: 834: 829: 819: 765: 737: 731: 726: 715: 695: 645: 641:Also note that 627: 574: 568: 563: 549: 536: 531:WP:ALLORNOTHING 516: 510: 505: 489: 483: 478: 458: 452: 447: 437: 408: 369: 350: 293: 288: 256: 250: 245: 175: 166: 131: 115: 112: 75: 72: 61: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 927: 925: 916: 915: 897: 896: 875:said above. -- 849: 848: 847: 796: 778: 777: 776: 775: 774: 773: 751: 750: 749: 748: 747: 746: 745: 744: 706: 705: 704: 703: 636: 635: 611: 588: 587: 586: 585: 584: 583: 582: 581: 546: 545: 544: 524: 523: 497: 496: 466: 465: 432: 431: 411:ImmortalWizard 406: 380: 379: 360: 341: 321: 300: 299: 286: 236: 235: 172: 111: 110: 105: 95: 90: 73: 71: 66: 57: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 926: 914: 912: 908: 904: 899: 898: 895: 892: 890: 883: 874: 869: 865: 861: 857: 853: 850: 846: 843: 838: 837: 832: 823: 818: 817: 816: 812: 808: 804: 800: 797: 795: 791: 787: 783: 780: 779: 772: 769: 768: 762:coincidence. 761: 757: 756: 755: 754: 753: 752: 743: 740: 735: 734: 729: 719: 714: 713: 712: 711: 710: 709: 708: 707: 702: 699: 698: 691: 685: 682: 679: 676: 673: 670: 667: 664: 661: 658: 655: 652: 649: 644: 640: 639: 638: 637: 634: 631: 630: 623: 619: 615: 612: 610: 606: 602: 597: 593: 590: 589: 580: 577: 572: 571: 566: 559: 553: 547: 543: 540: 539: 532: 528: 527: 526: 525: 522: 519: 514: 513: 508: 501: 500: 499: 498: 495: 492: 487: 486: 481: 474: 470: 469: 468: 467: 464: 461: 456: 455: 450: 441: 436: 435: 434: 433: 430: 426: 422: 418: 412: 407: 405: 401: 397: 393: 389: 385: 382: 381: 377: 374: 372: 366: 361: 358: 355: 353: 347: 342: 339: 335: 331: 327: 322: 319: 315: 311: 307: 302: 301: 297: 291: 284: 281: 277: 273: 269: 265: 264: 263: 262: 259: 254: 253: 248: 241: 238:According to 231: 227: 224: 221: 217: 213: 209: 206: 203: 200: 197: 194: 191: 188: 185: 181: 178: 177:Find sources: 173: 169: 165: 162: 156: 152: 148: 144: 139: 135: 130: 126: 122: 118: 114: 113: 109: 106: 103: 99: 96: 94: 91: 89: 86: 85: 84: 82: 77: 70: 67: 65: 64: 60: 59:contributions 55: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 902: 900: 876: 851: 833: 828: 798: 786:ChrisTheDude 781: 763: 759: 730: 725: 693: 689: 680: 674: 668: 662: 656: 650: 625: 622:this article 613: 591: 567: 562: 552:ChrisTheDude 534: 509: 504: 482: 477: 472: 451: 446: 440:ChrisTheDude 421:ChrisTheDude 383: 371:CAPTAIN RAJU 370: 352:CAPTAIN RAJU 351: 274:to the log ( 267: 249: 244: 237: 225: 219: 211: 204: 198: 192: 186: 176: 163: 74: 54:Patar knight 49: 47: 31: 28: 558:WP:MULTIAFD 388:WP:NOTSTATS 272:transcluded 202:free images 864:WP:SPINOFF 860:WP:NOTSTAT 856:WP:CRICKET 678:blockĀ user 672:filterĀ log 907:talk page 866:based on 690:TWO YEARS 684:blockĀ log 643:02blythed 37:talk page 909:or in a 830:Immortal 727:Immortal 654:contribs 618:WP:POINT 564:Immortal 506:Immortal 479:Immortal 448:Immortal 330:Bakazaka 310:Bakazaka 246:Immortal 161:View log 102:glossary 39:or in a 766:Lugnuts 760:amazing 718:Lugnuts 696:Lugnuts 628:Lugnuts 537:Lugnuts 292::Online 208:WPĀ refs 196:scholar 134:protect 129:history 79:New to 841:(chat) 835:Wizard 738:(chat) 732:Wizard 575:(chat) 569:Wizard 517:(chat) 511:Wizard 490:(chat) 484:Wizard 459:(chat) 453:Wizard 396:Ajf773 384:Delete 276:step 3 257:(chat) 251:Wizard 180:Google 138:delete 223:JSTOR 184:books 168:Stats 155:views 147:watch 143:links 52:. -- 16:< 852:Keep 811:talk 799:Note 790:talk 782:Keep 666:logs 648:talk 614:Keep 605:talk 592:Note 529:See 425:talk 417:Here 400:talk 334:talk 314:talk 282:. ā€” 216:FENS 190:news 151:logs 125:talk 121:edit 50:keep 887:ray 881:Big 230:TWL 159:ā€“ ( 56:- / 813:) 792:) 607:) 560:. 533:. 427:) 402:) 394:. 367:. 348:. 336:) 328:. 316:) 308:. 210:) 153:| 149:| 145:| 141:| 136:| 132:| 127:| 123:| 889:į—™ 885:X 879:D 824:: 820:@ 809:( 788:( 720:: 716:@ 686:) 681:Ā· 675:Ā· 669:Ā· 663:Ā· 657:Ā· 651:Ā· 646:( 603:( 554:: 550:@ 548:' 473:n 442:: 438:@ 423:( 413:: 409:@ 398:( 332:( 312:( 234:) 226:Ā· 220:Ā· 212:Ā· 205:Ā· 199:Ā· 193:Ā· 187:Ā· 182:( 174:( 171:) 164:Ā· 157:) 119:( 104:) 100:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Patar knight
contributions
22:32, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
List of international cricket five-wicket hauls at the Riverside Ground

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
List of international cricket five-wicket hauls at the Riverside Ground
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

ā†‘