740:
entirely devoted to the industry. You question the reliability of sources such as
Brazzers, but do you have anything to suggest such a source is unreliable? At the end of the day its a business, and one that from what I have seen from the sources has signed a contract agreement with this person. I would imagine a professional business would be likely to provide accurate information about someone it is in contract with.
701:
That rationale is circular. Other language versions of
Knowledge (XXG) copy from one another, especially from en.Knowledge (XXG), which as nearly 6 million articles, more than all the others. Interwiki efforts for completeness don't establish notability. Have you looked at the other wiki pages? I
682:
There are 21 other language versions of this page. It seems highly unlikely that the
English language version is the only version that cannot pass notability guidelines when all the others appear to. I'm sure other sources could be pulled from the other language version of this page to be used on the
576:
I read John's comment as referring to the porn industry's promotion machine (porn trade press, award ceremonies, and
Internet flooding) and the article's low quality references, not to you personally. The problem with sources for porn have been discussed extensively since 2006. It finally came down
647:
The problem here comes down to the ever moving goal post for PORNBIO. Madison Ivy is indeed a successful pornographic actress for the past decade, yet according to
Knowledge (XXG) even with multiple awards it wouldn’t be enough. I don’t know what SFW sources people expect to find for these people
486:
Creator of the page here. Thank you for the citation cleanup. As for the remaining references, note that not all of them are interviews. Now, I understand the effort to maintain credible journalistic practices but I am appalled by the number of articles written on other porn actresses that do not
515:
is listed under articles to avoid in AfD debates. Articles stand or fall based on their own merits. As for poorly written porn articles, the PORNBIO secondary notability guideline, which protected many of these articles is no more. These articles are being culled. Madison Ivy has been deleted
739:
I don't see the issue of using sources from or relating to the porn industry. Of course that is where virtually all the information about pornographic film actors is likely to come from. The industry - while popular - is not a mainstream or open phenomenon, so is reliant on sources largely or
468:
This article failed even when we had the now destroyed notability guidelines giving special preference to pornographic performers. Now when we do not have those, we can see that such publicity driving internal industry promotionalism does not rise to the level of 3rd party
720:
Additional comment: This article appears to have been translated back from another wiki after it was deleted twice and salted here. en.Knowledge (XXG) has tightened its standards for notability and quality of sources. The most recent deprecation of
239:
305:
97:
92:
87:
345:
702:
did, many are stubs with an external link to IMDb or IAFD as their source. Others have the exact same sources as the en wiki page. As I asked you on the talk page, if you can find a non-trivial
192:
385:
365:
233:
405:
325:
270:
Deleted twice at AfD and salted. The new version got moved in from draft space. May not be strict G4 candidate, but lack of notability was established even when
544:
Did you just assume I am an industry insider? Before making such statements, peer into my history log to see if there's any validity to your assumptions. Cheers!
82:
199:
428:
124:
139:
487:
follow the same standards. Many are based heavily on interviews and poor sources. I urge all to exercise this same diligence in those cases as well.
425:
119:
112:
17:
165:
160:
765:
749:
734:
715:
692:
674:
657:
639:
611:
586:
560:
525:
503:
478:
460:
440:
417:
397:
377:
357:
337:
317:
297:
65:
169:
133:
129:
254:
221:
152:
782:
40:
670:
474:
516:
twice per editor consensus. The latest iteration does not solve the notability problems discussed previously.
215:
666:
512:
778:
211:
36:
703:
156:
653:
605:
596:
554:
545:
539:
497:
488:
470:
741:
722:
684:
271:
745:
688:
261:
247:
61:
148:
71:
730:
711:
582:
521:
436:
413:
393:
373:
353:
333:
313:
293:
285:
108:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
777:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
632:
451:
I did some quick cleanup of unreliable sources, leaving basically nothing but interviews. --
626:
649:
571:
227:
456:
57:
762:
726:
725:
was part of that evolution. Other wikis are free to accept or reject that change.
707:
578:
517:
432:
409:
389:
369:
349:
329:
309:
289:
281:
186:
276:
665:
Fails GNG. She didn't even meet the standards of PORNBIO when it was in effect.
452:
648:
unless they magically (albeit rarely) cross over into the mainstream.
773:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
761:
fails everything and the keep votes have no basis in policy.
595:
Okay, I must've misread. I didn't know any better. Apologies.
274:
was in effect. Citations are full of junk sources like The
706:
reference in those other wiki pages, please share it here.
306:
list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions
346:
list of
Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions
182:
178:
174:
280:, self-published blogs and celebrity net worth sites.
246:
577:
to the consensus that WP:PORNBIO should be retired.
260:
98:Articles for deletion/Madison Ivy (4th nomination)
93:Articles for deletion/Madison Ivy (3rd nomination)
88:Articles for deletion/Madison Ivy (2nd nomination)
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
785:). No further edits should be made to this page.
404:Note: This discussion has been included in the
384:Note: This discussion has been included in the
364:Note: This discussion has been included in the
344:Note: This discussion has been included in the
324:Note: This discussion has been included in the
304:Note: This discussion has been included in the
386:list of California-related deletion discussions
8:
366:list of Germany-related deletion discussions
140:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
629:. It is a pestilence on Knowledge (XXG).
406:list of Texas-related deletion discussions
403:
383:
363:
343:
326:list of Women-related deletion discussions
323:
303:
625:No evidence to support an article. Fails
424:Note: This debate has been added to the
80:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
78:
24:
83:Articles for deletion/Madison Ivy
288:) 18:30, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
125:Introduction to deletion process
1:
766:23:15, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
750:19:27, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
735:19:10, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
716:19:03, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
693:15:18, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
675:20:43, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
658:21:12, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
640:15:33, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
612:05:22, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
587:00:56, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
561:00:20, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
526:01:09, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
504:00:20, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
479:21:37, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
461:18:52, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
441:18:34, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
418:18:30, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
398:18:30, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
378:18:30, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
358:18:30, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
338:18:30, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
318:18:30, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
298:18:30, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
66:03:35, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
115:(AfD)? Read these primers!
802:
775:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
426:WikiProject Pornography
77:AfDs for this article:
113:Articles for deletion
683:English version.
471:John Pack Lambert
429:list of deletions
420:
400:
380:
360:
340:
320:
130:Guide to deletion
120:How to contribute
793:
667:Wikiuser20102011
637:
635:
608:
602:
599:
575:
557:
551:
548:
543:
500:
494:
491:
443:
265:
264:
250:
202:
190:
172:
110:
34:
801:
800:
796:
795:
794:
792:
791:
790:
789:
783:deletion review
759:delete and salt
633:
631:
610:
606:
600:
597:
569:
559:
555:
549:
546:
540:Johnpacklambert
537:
502:
498:
492:
489:
423:
207:
198:
163:
147:
144:
107:
104:
102:
75:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
799:
797:
788:
787:
769:
768:
755:
754:
753:
752:
737:
718:
696:
695:
677:
660:
642:
619:
618:
617:
616:
615:
614:
604:
590:
589:
564:
563:
553:
531:
530:
529:
528:
507:
506:
496:
481:
463:
445:
444:
421:
401:
381:
361:
341:
321:
268:
267:
204:
143:
142:
137:
127:
122:
105:
103:
101:
100:
95:
90:
85:
79:
76:
74:
69:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
798:
786:
784:
780:
776:
771:
770:
767:
764:
760:
757:
756:
751:
747:
743:
738:
736:
732:
728:
724:
719:
717:
713:
709:
705:
700:
699:
698:
697:
694:
690:
686:
681:
678:
676:
672:
668:
664:
661:
659:
655:
651:
646:
643:
641:
638:
636:
628:
624:
621:
620:
613:
609:
603:
594:
593:
592:
591:
588:
584:
580:
573:
568:
567:
566:
565:
562:
558:
552:
541:
536:
533:
532:
527:
523:
519:
514:
513:WP:WHATABOUTX
511:
510:
509:
508:
505:
501:
495:
485:
482:
480:
476:
472:
467:
464:
462:
458:
454:
450:
447:
446:
442:
438:
434:
430:
427:
422:
419:
415:
411:
407:
402:
399:
395:
391:
387:
382:
379:
375:
371:
367:
362:
359:
355:
351:
347:
342:
339:
335:
331:
327:
322:
319:
315:
311:
307:
302:
301:
300:
299:
295:
291:
287:
283:
279:
278:
273:
263:
259:
256:
253:
249:
245:
241:
238:
235:
232:
229:
226:
223:
220:
217:
213:
210:
209:Find sources:
205:
201:
197:
194:
188:
184:
180:
176:
171:
167:
162:
158:
154:
150:
146:
145:
141:
138:
135:
131:
128:
126:
123:
121:
118:
117:
116:
114:
109:
99:
96:
94:
91:
89:
86:
84:
81:
73:
70:
68:
67:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
774:
772:
758:
679:
662:
644:
630:
622:
534:
483:
465:
448:
275:
269:
257:
251:
243:
236:
230:
224:
218:
208:
195:
106:
53:
49:
47:
31:
28:
704:WP:RELIABLE
634:scope_creep
277:Daily Sport
234:free images
149:Madison Ivy
72:Madison Ivy
723:WP:PORNBIO
650:Trillfendi
572:Streetsoda
272:WP:PORNBIO
779:talk page
742:Helper201
727:• Gene93k
708:• Gene93k
685:Helper201
579:• Gene93k
518:• Gene93k
469:coverage.
433:• Gene93k
410:• Gene93k
390:• Gene93k
370:• Gene93k
350:• Gene93k
330:• Gene93k
310:• Gene93k
290:• Gene93k
282:• Gene93k
58:Barkeep49
37:talk page
781:or in a
449:Comment:
193:View log
134:glossary
39:or in a
763:Spartaz
645:Comment
535:Comment
240:WP refs
228:scholar
166:protect
161:history
111:New to
680:Oppose
663:Delete
627:WP:BIO
623:Delete
598:Street
547:Street
490:Street
484:Oppose
466:Delete
212:Google
170:delete
50:delete
255:JSTOR
216:books
200:Stats
187:views
179:watch
175:links
16:<
746:talk
731:talk
712:talk
689:talk
671:talk
654:talk
607:talk
601:Soda
583:talk
556:talk
550:Soda
522:talk
499:talk
493:Soda
475:talk
457:talk
453:Ronz
437:talk
414:talk
394:talk
374:talk
354:talk
334:talk
314:talk
294:talk
286:talk
248:FENS
222:news
183:logs
157:talk
153:edit
62:talk
54:salt
52:and
262:TWL
191:– (
748:)
733:)
714:)
691:)
673:)
656:)
585:)
524:)
477:)
459:)
439:)
431:.
416:)
408:.
396:)
388:.
376:)
368:.
356:)
348:.
336:)
328:.
316:)
308:.
296:)
242:)
185:|
181:|
177:|
173:|
168:|
164:|
159:|
155:|
64:)
56:.
744:(
729:(
710:(
687:(
669:(
652:(
581:(
574::
570:@
542::
538:@
520:(
473:(
455:(
435:(
412:(
392:(
372:(
352:(
332:(
312:(
292:(
284:(
266:)
258:·
252:·
244:·
237:·
231:·
225:·
219:·
214:(
206:(
203:)
196:·
189:)
151:(
136:)
132:(
60:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.