Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/NGC 529 - Knowledge

Source 📝

239: 380:
because many many astronomical objects are covered fleetingly in anywhere up to 100 papers each. So they have bene studied in passing to build up a composite picture of them. This is radically different to other items, which are covered in detail in fewer sources.
207: 160: 258: 201: 305:
contains many suggestions on how to determine if an object is notable, but doesn't determine notability. See the note at the bottom of the criteria section:
362:, could you expand on your reasoning for why this article still meets the general notability requirements? I'm not sure I completely understand your point. 107: 335:. unfortunately sourcing is tricky for many astronomical objects and becomes an amalgam of many brief mentions in articles with large numbers of objects. 285:, which specifically lists the NGC catalog as being of sufficient importance that objects in it are considered notable enough for a stand-alone article. 92: 318:
This object fails general notability criteria as there isn't significant coverage of it in any sources (that I could find, at least).
167: 60: 87: 80: 17: 392: 346: 222: 133: 128: 101: 97: 189: 137: 415: 40: 120: 183: 411: 36: 312: 290: 58: 179: 215: 396: 371: 350: 327: 294: 270: 250: 62: 386: 367: 340: 323: 266: 246: 229: 76: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
410:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
302: 282: 286: 53: 382: 363: 357: 336: 319: 262: 242: 195: 315:, they merely supplement and clarify it within the context of astronomical objects. 124: 154: 116: 68: 406:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
150: 146: 142: 214: 238:
Not notable as only sources mentioned it (outside of
43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 418:). No further edits should be made to this page. 257:Note: This discussion has been included in the 259:list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions 228: 8: 108:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 256: 7: 24: 311:These criteria do not supersede 93:Introduction to deletion process 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 241:) are catalogues and tables. 397:04:14, 10 January 2020 (UTC) 372:03:47, 10 January 2020 (UTC) 351:01:53, 10 January 2020 (UTC) 63:11:32, 10 January 2020 (UTC) 328:00:56, 4 January 2020 (UTC) 295:18:09, 3 January 2020 (UTC) 271:16:27, 2 January 2020 (UTC) 251:16:27, 2 January 2020 (UTC) 83:(AfD)? Read these primers! 435: 408:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 317: 306: 81:Articles for deletion 273: 98:Guide to deletion 88:How to contribute 426: 361: 233: 232: 218: 170: 158: 140: 78: 34: 434: 433: 429: 428: 427: 425: 424: 423: 422: 416:deletion review 355: 175: 166: 131: 115: 112: 75: 72: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 432: 430: 421: 420: 402: 401: 400: 399: 375: 374: 353: 330: 297: 275: 274: 236: 235: 172: 111: 110: 105: 95: 90: 73: 71: 66: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 431: 419: 417: 413: 409: 404: 403: 398: 394: 391: 388: 384: 379: 378: 377: 376: 373: 369: 365: 359: 354: 352: 348: 345: 342: 338: 334: 331: 329: 325: 321: 316: 314: 313:WP:NOTABILITY 310: 304: 301: 298: 296: 292: 288: 284: 280: 277: 276: 272: 268: 264: 260: 255: 254: 253: 252: 248: 244: 240: 231: 227: 224: 221: 217: 213: 209: 206: 203: 200: 197: 194: 191: 188: 185: 181: 178: 177:Find sources: 173: 169: 165: 162: 156: 152: 148: 144: 139: 135: 130: 126: 122: 118: 114: 113: 109: 106: 103: 99: 96: 94: 91: 89: 86: 85: 84: 82: 77: 70: 67: 65: 64: 61: 59: 57: 56: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 407: 405: 389: 343: 332: 308: 307: 299: 278: 237: 225: 219: 211: 204: 198: 192: 186: 176: 163: 74: 54: 49: 47: 31: 28: 202:free images 287:Aldebarium 55:Ritchie333 412:talk page 383:Cas Liber 337:Cas Liber 303:WP:NASTRO 283:WP:NASTRO 37:talk page 414:or in a 393:contribs 364:Sam-2727 358:Casliber 347:contribs 320:Sam-2727 263:Sam-2727 243:Sam-2727 161:View log 102:glossary 39:or in a 309:Note 1: 300:Comment 281:. See 208:WP refs 196:scholar 134:protect 129:history 117:NGC 529 79:New to 69:NGC 529 180:Google 138:delete 223:JSTOR 184:books 168:Stats 155:views 147:watch 143:links 16:< 387:talk 368:talk 341:talk 333:Keep 324:talk 291:talk 279:Keep 267:talk 247:talk 216:FENS 190:news 151:logs 125:talk 121:edit 50:keep 230:TWL 159:– ( 395:) 370:) 349:) 326:) 293:) 269:) 261:. 249:) 210:) 153:| 149:| 145:| 141:| 136:| 132:| 127:| 123:| 52:. 390:· 385:( 366:( 360:: 356:@ 344:· 339:( 322:( 289:( 265:( 245:( 234:) 226:· 220:· 212:· 205:· 199:· 193:· 187:· 182:( 174:( 171:) 164:· 157:) 119:( 104:) 100:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Ritchie333


11:32, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
NGC 529

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
NGC 529
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.