Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Northern Forest Archipelago - Knowledge

Source 📝

326:- This article just seems to spread misinformation, and is harmful. I want it gone, before it's used to make a bad precident. The fact one of the two "independent" references cite wikipedia, shows the harm of us publishing this stuff. We put something out, others follow it, then we follow them, then they follow us, then......... Let's stop the silly story cycle and delete it. -- 398:
Have a nice weekend everyone, I had no desire to upset anyone, as a number of people seem to be...contrary to Uncle G's addendum, I answered the assertions made concerning the notability of the NFA (and the external news coverage, if he would take the time to read the Adirondack Explorer article, but
91:
Obviously, having written the article, I disagree. The NFA is notable as it is one of the longer-lived micronations. If you take the time to peruse their site, you will see that it is more developed than many micronations, including currency, postage, "bricks and mortar" presence. It has also been
267:
There are 2 external news articles, one of which lists wikipedia among its numerous sources (although why citing wikipedia as a source would preclude it from being considered an article in the "real world" seems strange to me anyway); the adk explorer article makes no mention of wikipedia at all.
133:
I must say, I have never heard of the concept before. (We're all micro nations over here in Europe!) I think it's a grand idea. And I hope the NFA succeed in getting the independent country status they presumably seek. Hard to see what really distinguishes them from the likes of other communes
352:. In other words the entire article is about a guy's state of mind. This is a silly joke, which we should not partake. If this guy gets enough followers, creates a real organization, then we can create an article on his environmental organization, but never an article for a "micronation". -- 248:
Notability generally involves some impact by the micronation upon the real world. Declaring a field to be an independent nation and telling only Knowledge about it (Pogo), or setting up a club on a web site (Atlasia), do not impact the real world at all. Sealand and Ladonia, in contrast, have
361:
Your bald, unsupported, assertion that this is notable does not address any of the specific reasons for the contrary that I laid out above. What real world events has the Northern Forest Archipelago been involved in? What independently written works on the subject of the micronation have been
110:
Well, a micronation that I was involved with for some time lasted over 12 years (about five longer that NFA), and wouldn't qualify for an article (FWIW, The Commonwealth of Port Colice). Mind you, our presence was probably slightly less that NFA's (no currency, though we did have postage, for
134:(etc..) though? And most of those are not sufficiently notable to be here. I don't know. Maybe it's a question of longevity? Or of import to others in the micro state world? In any case, being around since 1998 makes me unconvinced of notability at this point in time. 268:
That won't necessarily change the outcome of this (as it seems pretty clear where this is headed), but I thought I would point it out. Is there a clearly defined criteria for inclusion of micronations into wikipedia, or is this done on a case by case basis? -
286:— That's a straw man. Nobody said any such thing. What I actually wrote was that the article "must be discounted when determining the notability of the micronation". An article that cites Knowledge as its source cannot even be used to determine the 102:
All that being said, you guys make the rules, so do what you're going to do. I am happy to agree to disagree with you, and let the wiki-community make their decision, as I am a newbie here. I will of course abide by the community's decision. -
249:
elicited mainstream news coverage, and have involved real disputes, real territories, and real court cases. Researching the Northern Forest Archipelago, I find that the external news coverage linked to by the article itself actually
253:, and so must be discounted when determining the notability of the micronation. There is no other news coverage, no independently written articles, and no evidence that the micronation has impacted upon the real world in any way. 95:
It is certainly more notable and less a case of microvanity than some of the other micronations included in wikipedia, if you will look at all of them without respect to newness on the site, or level of completeness to date.
310:, no. I attribute this to there simply having been no incentive. We aren't inundated with micronation articles to the same extent that we are inundated with articles about persons, bands, companies, and web sites. 347:
No it doesn't exist, and it is not notable. Aside the from the silly claims of being a "micronation"; there really isn't evidence of any organization. The web site claims you can join up if you own some land but
200: 190: 150: 220: 160: 274:
AFAIK, it's on a case by case basis, but if I were to set forth a criteria about this perennial issue over which micronations Knowledge should include, I'd use Uncle G's. --
210: 170: 350:"...declaring your land to be a part of the NFA does not have an impact on your legal rights of ownership, it is more a state of mind than a binding legal contract..." 180: 230: 376:: it is not a real country, they just claim it is. The government hasn't responded because it's not a big enough deal for them to get involved. -- 240: 17: 416: 403: 392: 380: 366: 356: 342: 330: 314: 278: 261: 138: 125: 85: 64: 48: 399:
he has already made his mind up)...if my answers, or the article do not satisfy you, or offend you, vote for deletion.
196: 99:
I would be more than happy to work to improve the article if there are deficiencies that you can point out to me.
431: 54: 36: 430:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
186: 216: 146: 80: 206: 166: 156: 284:
why citing wikipedia as a source would preclude it from being considered an article in the "real world"
339: 176: 118: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
413: 412:. It's not about offense, Jamie, but this just isn't verifiable, enyclopedic information. 400: 299: 269: 104: 389: 303: 78: 353: 327: 307: 295: 135: 112: 45: 363: 311: 275: 258: 388:
This is just microsilliness and in no way can be considered encyclopedic. C'mon!
377: 143:
Micronations have come up for deletion before. See the following for examples:
61: 226: 74: 290:
of a subject. It certainly cannot be used to determine notability.
236: 292:
Is there a clearly defined criteria for inclusion of micronations
424:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
294:— Not inasmuch as editors have written a page similar to 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 434:). No further edits should be made to this page. 8: 92:written up in 2 recent magazine articles. 44:The result of the debate was delete. - 7: 24: 197:Virtual Commonwealth of Cyberia 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 251:cites Knowledge as its source 49:05:22, 15 October 2005 (UTC) 417:22:26, 9 October 2005 (UTC) 404:11:54, 7 October 2005 (UTC) 393:06:53, 7 October 2005 (UTC) 381:03:24, 7 October 2005 (UTC) 367:03:03, 7 October 2005 (UTC) 357:00:52, 7 October 2005 (UTC) 343:23:10, 6 October 2005 (UTC) 331:21:58, 6 October 2005 (UTC) 315:03:03, 7 October 2005 (UTC) 279:19:12, 6 October 2005 (UTC) 262:15:44, 6 October 2005 (UTC) 139:14:51, 6 October 2005 (UTC) 126:12:11, 6 October 2005 (UTC) 86:08:25, 6 October 2005 (UTC) 65:07:21, 6 October 2005 (UTC) 55:Northern Forest Archipelago 451: 338:it exists and is notable. 60:Non-notable micronation. 427:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 187:Nova Roma (Micronation) 147:Principality of Sealand 217:Empire of Septempontia 157:Ladonia (micronation) 207:Societas Via Romana 167:Republic of Atlasia 124: 73:, microvanity. -- 442: 429: 121: 116: 82: 34: 450: 449: 445: 444: 443: 441: 440: 439: 438: 432:deletion review 425: 340:freestylefrappe 266:Uncle G --: --> 119: 83: 58: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 448: 446: 437: 436: 420: 419: 396: 395: 383: 371: 370: 369: 359: 333: 321: 320: 319: 318: 317: 281: 246: 245: 244: 241:AfD discussion 234: 231:AfD discussion 224: 221:AfD discussion 214: 211:AfD discussion 204: 201:AfD discussion 194: 191:AfD discussion 184: 181:AfD discussion 177:Nation of Pogo 174: 171:AfD discussion 164: 161:AfD discussion 154: 151:AfD discussion 141: 128: 89: 88: 79: 57: 52: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 447: 435: 433: 428: 422: 421: 418: 415: 411: 408: 407: 406: 405: 402: 394: 391: 387: 386:Strong Delete 384: 382: 379: 375: 372: 368: 365: 360: 358: 355: 351: 346: 345: 344: 341: 337: 334: 332: 329: 325: 322: 316: 313: 309: 305: 301: 297: 293: 289: 288:verifiability 285: 282: 280: 277: 273: 272: 271: 265: 264: 263: 260: 256: 252: 247: 242: 238: 235: 232: 228: 225: 222: 218: 215: 212: 208: 205: 202: 198: 195: 192: 188: 185: 182: 178: 175: 172: 168: 165: 162: 158: 155: 152: 148: 145: 144: 142: 140: 137: 132: 129: 127: 123: 122: 114: 109: 108: 107: 106: 100: 97: 93: 87: 84: 76: 72: 69: 68: 67: 66: 63: 56: 53: 51: 50: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 426: 423: 409: 397: 385: 373: 362:published? 349: 335: 323: 291: 287: 283: 254: 250: 131:Micro Delete 130: 117: 101: 98: 94: 90: 70: 59: 43: 31: 28: 414:Chick Bowen 336:Strong Keep 111:instance). 390:Dottore So 270:jsheffield 105:jsheffield 227:Atlantium 300:WP:MUSIC 136:Marcus22 113:Grutness 46:R. fiend 364:Uncle G 312:Uncle G 304:WP:CORP 276:llywrch 259:Uncle G 81:tɔktəmi 410:Delete 378:Kjkolb 374:Delete 324:Delete 308:WP:WEB 296:WP:BIO 255:Delete 71:Delete 401:Jamie 306:, or 237:Almea 62:Quale 16:< 120:wha? 75:Angr 354:rob 328:rob 115:... 302:, 298:, 257:. 243:) 239:( 233:) 229:( 223:) 219:( 213:) 209:( 203:) 199:( 193:) 189:( 183:) 179:( 173:) 169:( 163:) 159:( 153:) 149:( 77:/

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
deletion review
R. fiend
05:22, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
Northern Forest Archipelago
Quale
07:21, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
Angr
tɔktəmi
08:25, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
jsheffield
Grutness
wha?
12:11, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
Marcus22
14:51, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
Principality of Sealand
AfD discussion
Ladonia (micronation)
AfD discussion
Republic of Atlasia
AfD discussion
Nation of Pogo
AfD discussion
Nova Roma (Micronation)
AfD discussion
Virtual Commonwealth of Cyberia
AfD discussion
Societas Via Romana
AfD discussion

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.