Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Sandra Appiah - Knowledge

Source 📝

860:." In some cases it is better to upgrade and source an article rather than be quick to try to delete it. Many of the AfD nominations could be completely avoided if people did this. So much drama and unproductive work could be avoided if more editors were like User: RebeccaGreen. Also, User:Senegambianamestudy made a strong argument. Namely, User:Senegambianamestudy wrote: " plenty of reliable sources that establishes notability 884:
So why make it harder on her? I think it is great that she has an article and I find her work admirable. She could have done business in the USA easily, but she chose the tougher path. But I am sure it is very rewarding for her (I know a couple of people who have done business in Africa and it
333:
about her as an individual. The "30 under 30" is about her as an entrepreneur, it's a list of individuals, not of less-than-thirty-year-old companies. That is markedly different from cases where an individual is only mentioned in passing in press coverage of their company. That she is notable
588:, co-founding of which is the subect's sole claim to fame and the context in which she has received coverage. Firstly, I'll note that the article as it stands is clearly promotional and shows clear signs of COI/UPE, such as containing details and content (eg, birthdate, schooling details, 558:
is a primary source as far as Appiah's statements about herself are concerned, but it does represent the world taking notice and thus counts in her favor for wiki-notability. (This is generally true of interviews; after all, publications have their choice of people
867: 556: 378: 881:." After all is said and done there is sufficient depth and breadth of coverage to keep the article. Finally, doing business is very challenging in many parts of Africa due to excessive regulation and that it is a developing country. 501:. The "30 under 30" listing does not count as a significant award (there are too many of them), but it does count as in-depth coverage by a reliable source. So do the newsone (via Huffpo) and Le Figaro pieces. So I think she passes 615:
in the current draft is simply a press-release about the column in Forbes, which nevertheless describes the list in a (technically) accurate manner, "Writing for Forbes.com, contributor Mfonobong Nsehe pulled together a
203: 803:
I have moved the sources listed under References to inline citations, and added some more sources and information. While a lot of coverage of her was generated by the launch of the Face2Face print magazine, the
443:, the only article having a meaningful link to this one. It seems then, that this is a little walled-garden and this article is basically an orphan. All-in-all, it seems likely to be promo/fan/vanity page. 611:'s entry on "Forbes contributors" and linked RSN discussions for details on why such content is deemed "generally unreliable" and should not be used as a source, especially in a BLP. Note too that 439:. The Ebony piece goes to notability, but the rest of the sources do not make any convincing case. Neither are the awards notable. Article was created by SPA, who also created the 251: 874: 385: 682: 576: 156: 197: 655:
a "pan-African media company"; it is not even an African company. Rather it is a New York based website that covers Africa with a view to promote pan-African themes.
815:, which sounds like her - she had helped form an Africans Around the World club, for example - except that this article says she went to high school in the Bronx.) 271: 636:
Overall, the write-ups/press-releases about Appiah are linked to the launch of Face2Face (thus the concentration of sourcing around Jan 2013), or launch of a
473: 309: 290: 103: 348:
Publications coming out annually with "30 under 30" and "40 under 40" and othersuch lists, getting on such a list is no where near a sign of notability.
88: 604: 878: 389: 163: 697: 519:
I stand corrected on the 30 under 30 part; see below. I still think the other coverage is in-depth and reliable enough for a weak pass. —
234:
Not notable outside of company, fails to establish notability as an individual. All of her news coverage are primarily for the company.
856:
I agree with User: RebeccaGreen who wrote: "...added some more sources and information... There is enough coverage about her to meet
334:
primarily for her work with one company is irrelevant, as long as the coverage is primarily about her as a person, as in this case.
129: 124: 133: 651:
article itself will need a clean up, since it too is written in a promotional and misleading manner. For example, Face2Face is
553: 83: 76: 17: 612: 864: 375: 116: 218: 861: 715: 673:
I cut the "30 under 30" blurb (an edit that was on my to-do list, but I was diverted until just now by a bagel sandwich).
637: 401: 372: 185: 97: 93: 871: 545: 505:. I've removed some of the more egregiously promotional writing from the article but it could still use more help. — 382: 770: 461: 339: 911: 882: 40: 711: 524: 510: 397: 179: 592:) not obtained from any of the cited sources. It also misrepresents its sourcing and what they say. Examples: 894: 848: 824: 820: 813: 793: 761: 740: 719: 664: 589: 528: 514: 491: 452: 427: 405: 357: 343: 320: 301: 282: 263: 243: 175: 58: 907: 678: 572: 36: 335: 812:. (I also found two paras from 2004 about a Sandra Appiah attending the English High School in Boston 789: 621: 448: 225: 693: 660: 520: 506: 211: 757: 600: 423: 353: 259: 239: 120: 890: 844: 816: 736: 313: 294: 275: 72: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
906:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
728: 674: 648: 641: 585: 568: 440: 626: 191: 857: 809: 785: 444: 415: 393: 689: 656: 608: 482: 837: 753: 749: 564: 502: 419: 349: 255: 235: 112: 64: 886: 840: 833: 732: 414:
All of the sources are not reliable, interviews are primary sources, clearly fails
150: 555:
and Newsone (picked up by HuffPo) are adequately in-depth. The BET interview
540: 54: 549: 808:
profile is from 2015. There is enough coverage about her to meet
607:
is simply one compiled by an individual Forbes Contributor. See
902:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
773:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
464:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
371:, plenty of reliable sources that establishes notability 146: 142: 138: 210: 885:rewarding to make a poor country more prosperous). 784:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 479:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 252:
list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions
875:Most Influential People of African Descent (MIPAD) 386:Most Influential People of African Descent (MIPAD) 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 914:). No further edits should be made to this page. 308:Note: This discussion has been included in the 289:Note: This discussion has been included in the 270:Note: This discussion has been included in the 250:Note: This discussion has been included in the 748:Current references show that she just passes 625:is simply a blurb to an article published in 272:list of New York-related deletion discussions 224: 8: 474:Knowledge:Deletion review/Log/2019 August 13 104:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 640:. The content is therefore best covered at 310:list of Women-related deletion discussions 307: 291:list of Ghana-related deletion discussions 288: 269: 249: 868:a catched copy of a 2013 interview by BET 379:a catched copy of a 2013 interview by BET 329:The press coverage linked in the lemma 472:Relisted after a "delete" closure per 7: 688:Got your priorities straight. :-) 563:interview.) That's enough to pass 24: 392:. At the very least, she passes 781:there is no strong consensus yet 89:Introduction to deletion process 879:one of the top 50 CEOs in Ghana 390:one of the top 50 CEOs in Ghana 52:. Consensus now clear to keep. 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 895:03:49, 1 September 2019 (UTC) 59:19:42, 2 September 2019 (UTC) 613:another of the cited sources 544:is not long but it is solid 849:21:14, 27 August 2019 (UTC) 825:05:47, 26 August 2019 (UTC) 794:23:47, 25 August 2019 (UTC) 762:17:20, 25 August 2019 (UTC) 741:23:50, 23 August 2019 (UTC) 720:23:31, 18 August 2019 (UTC) 698:18:48, 17 August 2019 (UTC) 683:17:43, 17 August 2019 (UTC) 665:16:46, 17 August 2019 (UTC) 577:16:31, 17 August 2019 (UTC) 529:05:28, 18 August 2019 (UTC) 515:15:34, 17 August 2019 (UTC) 492:07:49, 17 August 2019 (UTC) 453:14:53, 13 August 2019 (UTC) 428:12:14, 11 August 2019 (UTC) 406:01:42, 11 August 2019 (UTC) 79:(AfD)? Read these primers! 931: 358:04:52, 9 August 2019 (UTC) 344:20:49, 8 August 2019 (UTC) 321:04:39, 6 August 2019 (UTC) 302:04:39, 6 August 2019 (UTC) 283:04:39, 6 August 2019 (UTC) 264:04:14, 6 August 2019 (UTC) 244:04:14, 6 August 2019 (UTC) 904:Please do not modify it. 638:a program on the website 32:Please do not modify it. 622:Huffington Post article 77:Articles for deletion 710:As per XOR'easter. 547:, and the pieces in 712:Senegambianamestudy 398:Senegambianamestudy 873:, and one of the 779:Relisting comment: 601:Forbes 30 Under 30 470:Relisting comment: 384:, and one of the 796: 494: 490: 323: 304: 285: 266: 94:Guide to deletion 84:How to contribute 922: 832:per non-trivial 783: 776: 774: 729:Face2Face Africa 700: 649:Face2Face Africa 642:Face2Face Africa 586:Face2Face Africa 538:The write-up in 489: 487: 480: 478: 467: 465: 441:Face2Face Africa 318: 299: 280: 229: 228: 214: 166: 154: 136: 74: 34: 930: 929: 925: 924: 923: 921: 920: 919: 918: 912:deletion review 797: 769: 767: 687: 495: 483: 481: 460: 458: 314: 295: 276: 171: 162: 127: 111: 108: 71: 68: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 928: 926: 917: 916: 898: 897: 851: 827: 786:Dom from Paris 782: 777: 766: 765: 764: 743: 722: 705: 704: 703: 702: 701: 668: 667: 645: 633: 632: 631: 630: 617: 599:included in a 579: 533: 532: 531: 521:David Eppstein 507:David Eppstein 477: 468: 457: 456: 455: 433: 432: 431: 430: 409: 408: 365: 364: 363: 362: 361: 360: 305: 286: 267: 232: 231: 168: 107: 106: 101: 91: 86: 69: 67: 62: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 927: 915: 913: 909: 905: 900: 899: 896: 892: 888: 883: 880: 876: 872: 869: 865: 862: 859: 855: 852: 850: 846: 842: 839: 835: 831: 828: 826: 822: 818: 814: 811: 807: 802: 799: 798: 795: 791: 787: 780: 775: 772: 763: 759: 755: 751: 747: 744: 742: 738: 734: 730: 726: 723: 721: 717: 713: 709: 706: 699: 695: 691: 686: 685: 684: 680: 676: 672: 671: 670: 669: 666: 662: 658: 654: 650: 646: 643: 639: 635: 634: 628: 624: 623: 618: 614: 610: 606: 602: 598: 594: 593: 591: 587: 583: 580: 578: 574: 570: 566: 562: 557: 554: 552: 551: 546: 543: 542: 537: 534: 530: 526: 522: 518: 517: 516: 512: 508: 504: 500: 497: 496: 493: 488: 486: 475: 471: 466: 463: 454: 450: 446: 442: 438: 435: 434: 429: 425: 421: 417: 413: 412: 411: 410: 407: 403: 399: 395: 391: 387: 383: 380: 376: 373: 370: 367: 366: 359: 355: 351: 347: 346: 345: 341: 337: 336:Markus Pössel 332: 328: 325: 324: 322: 319: 317: 311: 306: 303: 300: 298: 292: 287: 284: 281: 279: 273: 268: 265: 261: 257: 253: 248: 247: 246: 245: 241: 237: 227: 223: 220: 217: 213: 209: 205: 202: 199: 196: 193: 190: 187: 184: 181: 177: 174: 173:Find sources: 169: 165: 161: 158: 152: 148: 144: 140: 135: 131: 126: 122: 118: 114: 113:Sandra Appiah 110: 109: 105: 102: 99: 95: 92: 90: 87: 85: 82: 81: 80: 78: 73: 66: 65:Sandra Appiah 63: 61: 60: 57: 56: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 903: 901: 853: 829: 817:RebeccaGreen 805: 800: 778: 768: 745: 724: 707: 652: 620: 596: 581: 560: 548: 539: 535: 498: 484: 469: 459: 436: 368: 330: 326: 316:CAPTAIN RAJU 315: 297:CAPTAIN RAJU 296: 278:CAPTAIN RAJU 277: 233: 221: 215: 207: 200: 194: 188: 182: 172: 159: 70: 53: 49: 47: 31: 28: 877:as well as 595:Appiah was 388:as well as 198:free images 675:XOR'easter 619:The cited 605:cited list 603:list. The 590:photograph 569:XOR'easter 485:Sandstein 445:Agricola44 908:talk page 690:Abecedare 657:Abecedare 541:Le Figaro 499:Weak keep 37:talk page 910:or in a 858:WP:BASIC 810:WP:BASIC 771:Relisted 754:Pichpich 725:Redirect 647:PS: The 616:list..." 582:Redirect 550:The Grio 462:Relisted 420:Meeanaya 416:WP:BASIC 394:WP:BASIC 350:Meeanaya 256:Meeanaya 236:Meeanaya 157:View log 98:glossary 39:or in a 887:Knox490 841:Wm335td 733:Epinoia 644:itself. 627:NewsOne 609:WP:RS/P 204:WP refs 192:scholar 130:protect 125:history 75:New to 838:WP:GNG 836:meets 806:Figaro 750:WP:GNG 565:WP:GNG 503:WP:GNG 437:Delete 327:Oppose 176:Google 134:delete 854:Keep. 834:WP:RS 219:JSTOR 180:books 164:Stats 151:views 143:watch 139:links 16:< 891:talk 845:talk 830:Keep 821:talk 801:Keep 790:talk 758:talk 746:Keep 737:talk 716:talk 708:Keep 694:talk 679:talk 661:talk 573:talk 536:Keep 525:talk 511:talk 449:talk 424:talk 402:talk 369:Keep 354:talk 340:talk 260:talk 240:talk 212:FENS 186:news 147:logs 121:talk 117:edit 55:Tone 50:keep 727:to 653:not 597:not 584:to 226:TWL 155:– ( 893:) 870:, 866:, 863:, 847:) 823:) 792:) 760:) 752:. 739:) 731:- 718:) 696:) 681:) 663:) 575:) 567:. 561:to 527:) 513:) 451:) 426:) 418:. 404:) 396:. 381:, 377:, 374:, 356:) 342:) 331:is 312:. 293:. 274:. 262:) 254:. 242:) 206:) 149:| 145:| 141:| 137:| 132:| 128:| 123:| 119:| 889:( 843:( 819:( 788:( 756:( 735:( 714:( 692:( 677:( 659:( 629:. 571:( 523:( 509:( 476:. 447:( 422:( 400:( 352:( 338:( 258:( 238:( 230:) 222:· 216:· 208:· 201:· 195:· 189:· 183:· 178:( 170:( 167:) 160:· 153:) 115:( 100:) 96:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Tone
19:42, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
Sandra Appiah

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
Sandra Appiah
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar
free images

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.