56:, whether this is a well written page, and whether it is notable in Knowledge (XXG) terms. On the first question, it seems like it's debatable whether the concept is shared among the cited religions, the second as noted isn't really a deletion rationale as has been noted, on the third it seems like there is no evidence. Thus delete, given that no sources have been provided (or even suggested) that discuss this topic.
824:, so poorly written, that at first I did not look at sources on the page, rather, I looked to see if I could source it. I just looked at that page and I am appalled. The Buddhism section is single sourced to a Welsh memoir about building Buddhism in Wales. The Judaism section is single sourced to a "collection of sermons and tracts" published in 1788.
1320:
The article is too simplistic to be in mainspace, but the general topic is viable. It needs rewriting by someone who understands the concept and how the various religions apply it--several such people have commented here. We did not 12 years ago have a good way to dealwith incomplete butpotentially
873:
and other religions. Without multiple independent reliable secondary sources, the article proposes an original idea: Scripture alone the source of authority is "a common aspect found in various religions." The idea appears to be plausible but
Knowledge (XXG) is not a publisher of original thought
1056:
I agree that deletion is not cleanup. If someone would like to write an article on religious textual literalism and provide sources to show the subject is generally notable, that's fine. What we have here is an article about scripture alone and I haven't found sources that make the subject pass
491:
Let's keep this to the point. From my experience in editing religious articles for three years on
Knowledge (XXG) now, my impression is that literalism and fundamentalism (in the scholarly sense) with regard to scriptures is found in many religious traditions, and that such phenomenon have been
663:
Judaism: section is nonsense. All of traditional/Orthodox
Judaism believes that scripture is authoritative, Kararites differ from mainstream Judaism on the method of interpreting scripture. Then comes the sourced sentence: "Karaite Jews interpret their scripture according to peshat, the plain
1289:
611:
This article needs some credible resources to support the notion without appealing to it, such as something academic about the concept itself and how it is common across multiple belief systems. If a few of these sorts of sources were added, then I agree and suggest
1018:
Deletion isn't a form of cleanup. I think the article should have discussion of the title and then improved, Reason for deletion #6 seems to be your closest suggestion but surely there's reliable sources out there. Just need to find contributors to find them!
214:
664:
meaning of the text understood by the ancient
Israelite authors". In fact, the Kraites were/are one of the competing sects of "ancient Israelite authors," all of whom conceived themselves as understandig the text correctly.
747:
called "the Cult of the Book", which is a trend in Mahayāna
Buddhist schools like Nichiren to devote themselves and pay homage to a scripture in similar style to how other Buddhists would pay homage to a Buddha image or a
1234:
the choice of a name. It is the fact that your assertion that there is a specific, reliably defined, theological approach to scripture shared by reliably defined groups of
Buddhists, Muslims, Jews and Christians is
1208:
should be called when applied to any religion, following reliable sources. The current title of the article is awkward. If and when such a name can be found and agreed on, notability can be checked.
752:. Though I am uncertain whether depicting the Nichiren Buddhists as accepting scripture alone as the source of authority is completely correct, it is not far from the truth. See also the sources at
420:
The article is about a common aspect found in various religions. This common aspect is noted in the articles on sola scriptura and quranism. I found it fascinating, so I made an article about it.
954:
can be written and adequately sourced, but there has been no evidence offered that it can be. Meanwhile, the page as it now stands is so woefully inadequate as to be a disgrace to the project.
208:
140:
135:
144:
987:
I'm sorry; why are you choosing to keep an article that doesn't exist? I've nominated the article you see now, not a possible article that could be written if somebody gathered sources.
249:. This article only re-states sentences from other articles specific to particular traditions. This subject hasn't really been discussed across faiths s everything here is redundant to
127:
1295:(monastic community) is thus blurred ..." It is now for us to decide whether such similarities are sufficient to consider this article, or the phenomenon it describes, as notable.--
342:
174:
703:
that page creator has created a number of heavily templated pages that rely on PRIMARY sourcing, and on simplistic and piously literal understandings of complex topics:
316:
290:
167:
1154:
an asset to the project when editors write pages, or propose to add pages about concepts regarding which htey have not invested the time to gain some degree of mastery.
394:
593:
approach is found in these four theologically distinctive religions? to me this begins to look like a concept and phrase being pushed by lone
Knowledge (XXG) user.
368:
1291:
have connected this with influence from
Protestantism: "rotestant Buddhism undercuts the importance of the religious professional ... the distinction between the
99:
1281:, as well as in Burma, there was more emphasis on reading Buddhist texts by oneself as opposed to having a monk explain them to you, and some scholars like
114:
716:
667:
Christianity: This concept started with Luther, who was a
Christian. Page fails to present a sophisticated understanding to the concept in Christianity.
1264::Meanwhile, I have done some digging, and found evidence of discussions of the authority of scripture throughout the multi-religious spectrum: Christian
645:
that originated with Martin Luther and simplistically – and with very little support from scholarly sources – imposes it on
Buddhism, Judaism and Islam.
229:
196:
1332:
1306:
1248:
1223:
1181:
1163:
1126:
1101:
1080:
1047:
1002:
963:
941:
920:
895:
853:
833:
806:
771:
731:
625:
602:
580:
564:
546:
525:
507:
480:
460:
429:
412:
386:
360:
334:
308:
282:
69:
190:
94:
87:
17:
186:
65:
131:
236:
123:
75:
108:
104:
555:
Or maybe not. I am not at all persuaded that this phrase is in wide use to describe streams of Buddhism, Judaism or Islam.
52:. Seems like the discussion here boils down to whether this concept exists in other religions and whether it thus isn't
1349:
783:: Buddhism was influenced much by Protestant ideas during the 19th and 20th century. This historical trend is known as
40:
202:
492:
studied scholarly and from multi-religious perspectives. The title of this article is quite awkward though. I'd say
704:
1114:
708:
1302:
1219:
849:
802:
767:
503:
1073:
995:
795:. Part of this was an emphasis on scripture to defend Buddhism against criticism from Christian missionaries.--
453:
405:
379:
353:
327:
301:
275:
61:
1271:
1209:
1236:
883:
712:
1345:
1278:
1244:
1159:
1122:
1097:
1061:. You might imagine such an article but without sources, it does not and shall not exist. The idea that
959:
829:
727:
598:
560:
521:
476:
36:
875:
1297:
1214:
844:
797:
762:
720:
542:
498:
1139:
1067:
1024:
1013:
989:
916:
908:
788:
589:
discussions to support the concept that this is a thing? I mean scholars who write that a similar
447:
399:
373:
347:
321:
295:
269:
222:
1259:
1177:
1043:
937:
891:
784:
57:
1204:
For those who wish to keep the article, there should first be agreement on how the principle of
821:
634:
1035:
1020:
974:
929:
912:
792:
753:
653:
621:
264:
83:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
1344:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
1240:
1155:
1118:
1093:
955:
825:
740:
723:
594:
556:
517:
472:
1058:
638:
246:
744:
576:
538:
425:
879:
586:
53:
1143:
868:
778:
657:
642:
251:
442:
1328:
1173:
1039:
978:
933:
887:
757:
982:
641:
Article is too simplistic to keep. This new, single-editor page takes a doctrine,
617:
161:
1268:
1089:
572:
436:
421:
1265:
465:
It is "mentioned" on those pages in the sense that you recently added it
1323:
1282:
842:
True, but quality of article does not pertain to notability of subject.--
694:
671:
256:
690:
675:
260:
1292:
1273:
But I couldn't find any scholarly discussion of what would amount to
686:
445:
before just writing about something because you find it fascinating.
717:
Scientific studies performed on private revelations and visionaries
749:
682:
678:
1340:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
697:
is a "sect", rather than a scholarly and theological approach.
660:
is wrong. I am happy to be corrected by scholars of Buddhism.
871:
that originated with Martin Luther ... imposes it on Buddhism
781:
that originated with Martin Luther ... imposes it on Buddhism
1065:
without even two such sources provided is wishful thinking.
537:
simply listing those articles it has until now copied from.
722:. Other pages created lack sourcing to support notability.
441:
You've been an editor since 2011. You should know to read
754:
Faith in Buddhism#Tiantai, Tendai and Nichiren Buddhism
469:
466:
157:
153:
149:
221:
693:." Where to start? Perhaps with the assertion that
235:
343:list of Christianity-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
1352:). No further edits should be made to this page.
393:Note: This discussion has been included in the
367:Note: This discussion has been included in the
341:Note: This discussion has been included in the
315:Note: This discussion has been included in the
289:Note: This discussion has been included in the
867:This new, single-editor page takes a doctrine,
777:This new, single-editor page takes a doctrine,
820:This article was such a blatant violation of
317:list of Buddhism-related deletion discussions
291:list of Religion-related deletion discussions
8:
1321:viable article, but now we do: Draft Space.
1277:in other religions. In Sri Lanka during the
395:list of Judaism-related deletion discussions
115:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
1212:has been rejected, any other suggestions?--
1172:Yes, they appear to be different concepts.
1063:"surely there's reliable sources out there"
392:
369:list of Islam-related deletion discussions
366:
340:
314:
288:
585:But can you find any scholarly or other
685:is the sole religious authority in the
124:Scripture alone the source of authority
76:Scripture alone the source of authority
1062:
866:
776:
1117:falls on those wishing for inclusion.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
793:Faith in Buddhism#Buddhist modernism
743:, there is in Buddhist history what
950:It may be that such an article on
24:
516:Can you bring any actual sources?
535:Transform to disambiguation page
100:Introduction to deletion process
471:as a "See also" link. Sheesh.
1:
652:Buddhism: The description of
952:religious textual literalism
905:religious textual literalism
756:. What's your take on this,
709:List of Legends in the Quran
90:(AfD)? Read these primers!
1369:
932:. You have won me over! -
865:I agree with E.M.Gregory,
705:Death penalty in the Bible
571:I agree with Tgeorgescu.
1342:Please do not modify it.
1333:01:56, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
1307:19:34, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
1249:19:12, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
1224:18:55, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
1182:16:44, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
1164:16:15, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
1127:16:11, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
1102:16:05, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
1081:15:08, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
1048:14:55, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
1003:14:42, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
964:14:37, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
942:14:33, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
921:13:49, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
896:10:17, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
854:08:13, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
834:01:53, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
807:08:13, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
772:08:13, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
732:22:06, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
626:15:03, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
603:01:33, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
581:22:01, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
565:22:06, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
547:21:13, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
526:01:41, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
508:20:23, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
481:01:38, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
461:20:10, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
430:19:42, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
413:19:38, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
387:19:38, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
361:19:38, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
335:19:38, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
309:19:38, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
283:19:36, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
70:07:48, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
670:Islam: page asserts: "
88:Articles for deletion
1287:Buddhism Transformed
1270:and multi-religious.
1230:The problem here is
1210:Religious literalism
1140:Biblical literalism
1034:Have to agree with
909:biblical literalism
789:Protestant Buddhism
713:Divine Mercy Novena
1115:burden of evidence
785:Buddhist modernism
750:religious monument
681:that believes the
1263:
654:Nichiren Buddhism
415:
389:
363:
337:
311:
265:Nichiren Buddhism
105:Guide to deletion
95:How to contribute
54:original research
1360:
1305:
1300:
1279:Buddhist revival
1257:
1222:
1217:
1150:concepts. It is
1079:
1076:
1070:
1017:
1001:
998:
992:
986:
852:
847:
805:
800:
770:
765:
689:and rejects the
506:
501:
459:
456:
450:
440:
411:
408:
402:
385:
382:
376:
359:
356:
350:
333:
330:
324:
307:
304:
298:
281:
278:
272:
240:
239:
225:
177:
165:
147:
85:
34:
1368:
1367:
1363:
1362:
1361:
1359:
1358:
1357:
1356:
1350:deletion review
1299:Farang Rak Tham
1298:
1296:
1216:Farang Rak Tham
1215:
1213:
1074:
1068:
1066:
1011:
996:
990:
988:
972:
846:Farang Rak Tham
845:
843:
799:Farang Rak Tham
798:
796:
764:Farang Rak Tham
763:
761:
745:Gregory Schopen
656:as adhering to
500:Farang Rak Tham
499:
497:
454:
448:
446:
434:
406:
400:
398:
380:
374:
372:
354:
348:
346:
328:
322:
320:
302:
296:
294:
276:
270:
268:
182:
173:
138:
122:
119:
82:
79:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1366:
1364:
1355:
1354:
1336:
1335:
1314:
1313:
1312:
1311:
1310:
1309:
1275:sola scriptura
1252:
1251:
1206:scripture only
1203:
1202:
1201:
1200:
1199:
1198:
1197:
1196:
1195:
1194:
1193:
1192:
1191:
1190:
1189:
1188:
1187:
1186:
1185:
1184:
1167:
1166:
1144:sola scriptura
1130:
1129:
1105:
1104:
1084:
1083:
1069:Chris Troutman
1051:
1050:
1029:
1028:
1014:Chris troutman
1006:
1005:
991:Chris Troutman
967:
966:
945:
944:
923:
898:
869:Sola scriptura
859:
858:
857:
856:
837:
836:
814:
813:
812:
811:
810:
809:
779:Sola scriptura
774:
735:
734:
698:
668:
665:
661:
658:Sola scriptura
647:
646:
643:Sola scriptura
628:
608:
607:
606:
605:
591:sola scripturs
569:
568:
567:
550:
549:
531:
530:
529:
528:
511:
510:
488:
487:
486:
485:
484:
483:
449:Chris Troutman
417:
416:
401:Chris Troutman
390:
375:Chris Troutman
364:
349:Chris Troutman
338:
323:Chris Troutman
312:
297:Chris Troutman
271:Chris Troutman
252:sola scriptura
245:Subject fails
243:
242:
179:
118:
117:
112:
102:
97:
80:
78:
73:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1365:
1353:
1351:
1347:
1343:
1338:
1337:
1334:
1330:
1326:
1325:
1319:
1316:
1315:
1308:
1304:
1301:
1294:
1290:
1288:
1284:
1280:
1276:
1272:
1269:
1266:
1261:
1260:edit conflict
1256:
1255:
1254:
1253:
1250:
1246:
1242:
1238:
1233:
1229:
1228:
1227:
1226:
1225:
1221:
1218:
1211:
1207:
1183:
1179:
1175:
1171:
1170:
1169:
1168:
1165:
1161:
1157:
1153:
1149:
1145:
1141:
1137:
1134:
1133:
1132:
1131:
1128:
1124:
1120:
1116:
1112:
1109:
1108:
1107:
1106:
1103:
1099:
1095:
1091:
1088:
1087:
1086:
1085:
1082:
1077:
1071:
1064:
1060:
1055:
1054:
1053:
1052:
1049:
1045:
1041:
1037:
1033:
1032:
1031:
1030:
1026:
1022:
1015:
1010:
1009:
1008:
1007:
1004:
999:
993:
984:
980:
976:
971:
970:
969:
968:
965:
961:
957:
953:
949:
948:
947:
946:
943:
939:
935:
931:
927:
924:
922:
918:
914:
910:
906:
902:
899:
897:
893:
889:
885:
881:
877:
872:
870:
864:
861:
860:
855:
851:
848:
841:
840:
839:
838:
835:
831:
827:
823:
819:
816:
815:
808:
804:
801:
794:
790:
786:
782:
780:
775:
773:
769:
766:
759:
755:
751:
746:
742:
739:
738:
737:
736:
733:
729:
725:
721:
718:
714:
710:
706:
702:
699:
696:
692:
688:
684:
680:
677:
673:
669:
666:
662:
659:
655:
651:
650:
649:
648:
644:
640:
636:
632:
629:
627:
623:
619:
615:
610:
609:
604:
600:
596:
592:
588:
584:
583:
582:
578:
574:
570:
566:
562:
558:
554:
553:
552:
551:
548:
544:
540:
536:
533:
532:
527:
523:
519:
515:
514:
513:
512:
509:
505:
502:
495:
490:
489:
482:
478:
474:
470:
467:
464:
463:
462:
457:
451:
444:
438:
433:
432:
431:
427:
423:
419:
418:
414:
409:
403:
396:
391:
388:
383:
377:
370:
365:
362:
357:
351:
344:
339:
336:
331:
325:
318:
313:
310:
305:
299:
292:
287:
286:
285:
284:
279:
273:
266:
262:
258:
254:
253:
248:
238:
234:
231:
228:
224:
220:
216:
213:
210:
207:
204:
201:
198:
195:
192:
188:
185:
184:Find sources:
180:
176:
172:
169:
163:
159:
155:
151:
146:
142:
137:
133:
129:
125:
121:
120:
116:
113:
110:
106:
103:
101:
98:
96:
93:
92:
91:
89:
84:
77:
74:
72:
71:
67:
66:contributions
63:
59:
58:Jo-Jo Eumerus
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
1341:
1339:
1322:
1317:
1286:
1285:in his book
1274:
1237:WP:UNSOURCED
1231:
1205:
1151:
1147:
1135:
1110:
951:
925:
904:
900:
884:WP:Synthesis
862:
817:
700:
630:
613:
590:
534:
493:
250:
244:
232:
226:
218:
211:
205:
199:
193:
183:
170:
81:
49:
47:
31:
28:
1241:E.M.Gregory
1156:E.M.Gregory
1119:E.M.Gregory
1094:E.M.Gregory
956:E.M.Gregory
903:and rename
901:Strong keep
876:WP:NOTESSAY
826:E.M.Gregory
791:. See also
741:E.M.Gregory
724:E.M.Gregory
719:, and more
595:E.M.Gregory
557:E.M.Gregory
518:E.M.Gregory
473:E.M.Gregory
209:free images
1267:, Buddhist
1090:Hear, hear
539:Tgeorgescu
1346:talk page
1148:different
1113:That the
37:talk page
1348:or in a
1318:Draftify
1283:Gombrich
1174:JimRenge
1146:are two
1040:Ret.Prof
979:Ret.Prof
934:Ret.Prof
907:such as
888:JimRenge
822:WP:ESSAY
758:JimRenge
695:Quranism
672:Quranism
635:WP:ESSAY
257:Quranism
168:View log
109:glossary
39:or in a
983:FULBERT
981:, and
818:comment
691:hadiths
676:Islamic
674:is the
618:FULBERT
261:Karaism
215:WP refs
203:scholar
141:protect
136:history
86:New to
1303:(Talk)
1293:sangha
1220:(Talk)
1059:WP:GNG
863:Delete
850:(Talk)
803:(Talk)
768:(Talk)
687:sharia
639:WP:TNT
631:Delete
504:(Talk)
263:, and
247:WP:GNG
187:Google
145:delete
50:delete
1329:talk
1138:that
926:Keep:
880:WP:OR
683:Quran
637:and
633:per
587:WP:RS
573:Oct13
437:Oct13
422:Oct13
230:JSTOR
191:books
175:Stats
162:views
154:watch
150:links
16:<
1245:talk
1178:talk
1160:talk
1142:and
1136:Note
1123:talk
1111:Note
1098:talk
1075:talk
1044:talk
1025:talk
997:talk
960:talk
938:talk
917:talk
892:talk
886:).
830:talk
728:talk
701:Note
679:sect
622:talk
616:---
614:Keep
599:talk
577:talk
561:talk
543:talk
522:talk
494:Keep
477:talk
455:talk
443:WP:N
426:talk
407:talk
381:talk
355:talk
329:talk
303:talk
277:talk
223:FENS
197:news
158:logs
132:talk
128:edit
62:talk
1324:DGG
1232:not
1152:not
1036:E.3
1021:E.3
975:E.3
930:E.3
928:OK
913:E.3
787:or
760:?--
711:,
496:.--
237:TWL
166:– (
1331:)
1247:)
1239:.
1180:)
1162:)
1125:)
1100:)
1046:)
1038:-
1019:--
977:,
962:)
940:)
919:)
911:--
894:)
882:,
878:,
832:)
730:)
715:,
707:,
624:)
601:)
579:)
563:)
545:)
524:)
479:)
468:,
428:)
397:.
371:.
345:.
319:.
293:.
267:.
259:,
255:,
217:)
160:|
156:|
152:|
148:|
143:|
139:|
134:|
130:|
68:)
64:,
1327:(
1262:)
1258:(
1243:(
1176:(
1158:(
1121:(
1096:(
1092:.
1078:)
1072:(
1042:(
1027:)
1023:(
1016::
1012:@
1000:)
994:(
985::
973:@
958:(
936:(
915:(
890:(
874:(
828:(
726:(
620:(
597:(
575:(
559:(
541:(
520:(
475:(
458:)
452:(
439::
435:@
424:(
410:)
404:(
384:)
378:(
358:)
352:(
332:)
326:(
306:)
300:(
280:)
274:(
241:)
233:·
227:·
219:·
212:·
206:·
200:·
194:·
189:(
181:(
178:)
171:·
164:)
126:(
111:)
107:(
60:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.