Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Seven Deadly Enemies of Man - Knowledge

Source 📝

732:- Piotrus offers an interesting comment I would like others to address. If there are reliable sources for plot summary alone, is it sufficient to satisfy the notability guidelines? I find it rather odd that it would be enough, but I would like to learn what others think. For now, I am leaning towards delete, but still thinking about it... - 764:"Knowledge treats creative works (including, for example, works of art or fiction, video games, documentaries, research books or papers, and religious texts) in an encyclopedic manner, discussing the development, design, reception, significance, and influence of works in addition to concise summaries of those works." 241:.", in turn, Rtkat3 deprodded with a comment "There can be potential for this page. Perhaps it can be AFD instead.". Unfortunatley, the article has not been improved significantly since, and the coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing 880: 253:
did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar, so yes, I think this can and should be AfDed instead... so, here we are. Can anyone find sources to rescue this? Otherwise restoring it to a redirect like it was until January this year might be the best compromise.
562:
Thanks for the list. Let me review them: is mainly about the biblical seven sins, doesn't even compare it much to the movie ones, it is pretty much just stating the obvious 'the seven sins from the movie were inspired by the biblical ones, and here is what those are'.
817:: The Vox article is decent; it talks about both the fictional characters and the mythical concept, and compares the two. The CBR article has some real-world design info. When comics characters appear in live-action movies and TV, they tend to get coverage. — 834:: Please click on the Scholar search above, and you’ll find a handful of informative books and a masters thesis, which discuss these very characters in some interesting contexts. This article seems to add to the encyclopedic knowledge on the subject matter.-- 567:(official blog) is a bit better, as it introduces the characters comic book history, but there is little analysis and the source is not independent, IMHO. The Comocbook one does the same (recap the character history from the comics), but is more independent: 583:). Overall, I think we have reliable sources for plot summary, but still next to no analysis of significance outside the comicverse. This really boils down to whether we consider plot summary recaps sufficient for meeting GNG or not. -- 373:- I found a lot of mentions of them in sources while looking for Rock of Eternity so I am assuming I feel the same with these characters. Keep in mind I can’t rescue too many articles at one time so no source linking to prove it yet. 706:
Sources 3 & 4 above make a stab at independent summary and commentary, but IMO fall short of what we require in terms of substantial coverage, and the rest is either in-house or interview/promotional. Not quite getting there.
198: 646:
based on the sources above. The Vox article is without question a good source. The other articles I find are sufficient for passing GNG because they go into the creation, development, and film adaptation of the characters.
297: 855:
If good sources exist, can you link them here, preferably with page numbers or quotations to where this group of fictional characters is analyzed in a way that goes beyond a descriptive plot summary? --
320: 911:(or redirect to an appropriate target if there is one) - the only decent sourcing is the Vox piece, and in my opinion does not go into enough depth about the characters to warrant passing 274: 192: 159: 872:
Here are a few sources that directly refer to the subject matter. Nothing in-depth, but illustrating that the article subject is used in analytical and academic studies:
132: 127: 681:
Per TTN and Piotrus. Sources indicate plot summary, but not any sort of reception. Just a minor plot element although I can see it being mentioned in some sort of
136: 354:. Any reader familiar enough with Captain Marvel/Shazam to search this term should be able to find the relevant information on related pages without a redirect. 119: 106: 91: 242: 549: 213: 804: 180: 564: 452: 875: 123: 86: 79: 17: 246: 174: 926: 897: 867: 843: 826: 809: 778: 749: 724: 698: 673: 656: 638: 595: 555: 400: 379: 363: 335: 312: 289: 266: 61: 876:
FROM EVERYMAN TO HERO: THE INCULTURATION AND PROPAGANDA OF THE ADVENTURES OF CAPTAIN MARVEL AND SPY SMASHER SERIALS pg. 17
719: 351: 497: 885: 347: 170: 115: 100: 96: 67: 220: 943: 40: 544: 437: 359: 796: 742: 893: 839: 682: 186: 939: 568: 467: 387:
unless proper sourcing is brought forth. Nothing has changed since I placed the PROD, so it still fails
36: 664:. The sources quoted are satisfactory to meet GNG requirements for a standalone article in my opinion. 453:
https://www.dccomics.com/blog/2019/04/22/everything-you-need-to-know-about-shazams-seven-deadly-sins
822: 624: 574: 571: 539: 527: 355: 206: 57: 791: 735: 652: 616: 425: 421: 374: 889: 861: 850: 835: 772: 759: 715: 692: 589: 413: 329: 306: 283: 260: 75: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
938:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
578: 512: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
669: 634: 581: 482: 350:, but that's too much of a travesty to be useful and should be deleted as a content fork of 250: 790:
I don't think the coverage presented is significant. No objection to covering in a list.
818: 53: 498:
https://www.denofgeek.com/comics/shazam-takes-on-black-adam-and-the-seven-deadly-sins/
916: 912: 648: 610: 417: 409: 396: 388: 238: 857: 768: 709: 688: 585: 325: 302: 279: 256: 153: 758:
I do not believe so. Plot summary alone being the content of an article violates
881:
Harold Schechter The New Gods: Psyche and Symbol in Popular Art Chapter 1 pg. 21
665: 630: 230: 438:
https://www.vox.com/culture/2019/4/9/18281369/seven-deadly-sins-shazam-se7en
392: 234: 468:
https://comicbook.com/dc/news/shazam-what-are-the-seven-deadly-sins-/
528:
https://www.digitalspy.com/movies/a26295869/shazam-dc-trailer-2/
412:. The article should be worked on (or discussed in a section at 298:
list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions
934:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
886:
The Comic-Book Superhero The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child
513:
https://collider.com/shazam-director-interview-black-adam/
483:
https://www.cbr.com/shazam-concept-art-seven-deadly-sins/
321:
list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions
580:), a super short inteview/comment on about the design ( 275:
list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions
149: 145: 141: 609:- Let this page stay. They are notable enemies of the 205: 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 946:). No further edits should be made to this page. 319:Note: This discussion has been included in the 296:Note: This discussion has been included in the 273:Note: This discussion has been included in the 237:prodded it with the following rationale: "Fails 915:. Let alone that it is the only decent source. 219: 8: 107:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 346:- I looked for a redirect target and found 318: 295: 272: 243:Knowledge:General notability guideline 233:earlier this year, and shortly after, 858:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 586:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 326:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 303:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 280:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 257:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 7: 229:This was created from a redirect by 348:List of DC Comics major characters 24: 92:Introduction to deletion process 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 247:Knowledge:Notability (fiction) 1: 927:23:47, 29 November 2020 (UTC) 898:14:58, 30 November 2020 (UTC) 868:05:14, 30 November 2020 (UTC) 844:19:36, 28 November 2020 (UTC) 827:16:09, 23 November 2020 (UTC) 810:07:38, 21 November 2020 (UTC) 779:14:45, 21 November 2020 (UTC) 750:01:57, 21 November 2020 (UTC) 725:01:36, 21 November 2020 (UTC) 699:21:44, 19 November 2020 (UTC) 674:14:36, 19 November 2020 (UTC) 657:00:10, 19 November 2020 (UTC) 639:20:17, 18 November 2020 (UTC) 596:08:10, 19 November 2020 (UTC) 556:16:46, 18 November 2020 (UTC) 401:15:12, 18 November 2020 (UTC) 380:14:49, 18 November 2020 (UTC) 364:13:49, 18 November 2020 (UTC) 352:Lists of DC Comics characters 336:08:41, 18 November 2020 (UTC) 313:08:41, 18 November 2020 (UTC) 290:08:41, 18 November 2020 (UTC) 267:08:41, 18 November 2020 (UTC) 613:and I support the claims of 62:03:07, 2 December 2020 (UTC) 685:page that could be created. 408:- Significant coverage per 116:Seven Deadly Enemies of Man 82:(AfD)? Read these primers! 68:Seven Deadly Enemies of Man 963: 936:Please do not modify it. 416:or somewhere else), per 32:Please do not modify it. 245:and the more detailed 80:Articles for deletion 683:Shazam! (franchise) 776: 748: 723: 696: 573:. Then we have a 414:Seven Deadly Sins 338: 315: 292: 97:Guide to deletion 87:How to contribute 954: 923: 920: 864: 854: 807: 799: 767: 747: 745: 740: 733: 713: 712: 687: 628: 620: 592: 552: 547: 542: 377: 332: 309: 286: 263: 224: 223: 209: 157: 139: 77: 34: 962: 961: 957: 956: 955: 953: 952: 951: 950: 944:deletion review 921: 918: 866: 862: 848: 803: 795: 777: 743: 736: 734: 708: 697: 622: 614: 594: 590: 550: 545: 540: 375: 334: 330: 311: 307: 288: 284: 265: 261: 166: 130: 114: 111: 74: 71: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 960: 958: 949: 948: 930: 929: 906: 905: 904: 903: 902: 901: 900: 883: 878: 856: 829: 812: 784: 783: 782: 781: 766: 753: 752: 727: 701: 686: 676: 659: 641: 625:Darkknight2149 603: 602: 601: 600: 599: 598: 584: 535: 534: 533: 532: 531: 530: 520: 519: 518: 517: 516: 515: 505: 504: 503: 502: 501: 500: 490: 489: 488: 487: 486: 485: 475: 474: 473: 472: 471: 470: 460: 459: 458: 457: 456: 455: 445: 444: 443: 442: 441: 440: 430: 429: 403: 382: 367: 366: 356:Argento Surfer 340: 339: 324: 316: 301: 293: 278: 255: 227: 226: 163: 110: 109: 104: 94: 89: 72: 70: 65: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 959: 947: 945: 941: 937: 932: 931: 928: 925: 924: 914: 910: 907: 899: 895: 891: 887: 884: 882: 879: 877: 874: 873: 871: 870: 869: 865: 859: 852: 847: 846: 845: 841: 837: 833: 830: 828: 824: 820: 816: 813: 811: 808: 806: 800: 798: 793: 792:SportingFlyer 789: 786: 785: 780: 774: 770: 765: 761: 757: 756: 755: 754: 751: 746: 741: 739: 738:GizzyCatBella 731: 728: 726: 721: 717: 711: 705: 702: 700: 694: 690: 684: 680: 677: 675: 671: 667: 663: 660: 658: 654: 650: 645: 642: 640: 636: 632: 626: 618: 617:Jhenderson777 612: 611:Marvel Family 608: 605: 604: 597: 593: 587: 582: 579: 576: 572: 569: 566: 561: 560: 559: 558: 557: 554: 553: 548: 543: 537: 536: 529: 526: 525: 524: 523: 522: 521: 514: 511: 510: 509: 508: 507: 506: 499: 496: 495: 494: 493: 492: 491: 484: 481: 480: 479: 478: 477: 476: 469: 466: 465: 464: 463: 462: 461: 454: 451: 450: 449: 448: 447: 446: 439: 436: 435: 434: 433: 432: 431: 427: 423: 419: 415: 411: 407: 404: 402: 398: 394: 390: 386: 383: 381: 378: 372: 369: 368: 365: 361: 357: 353: 349: 345: 342: 341: 337: 333: 327: 322: 317: 314: 310: 304: 299: 294: 291: 287: 281: 276: 271: 270: 269: 268: 264: 258: 252: 249:requirement. 248: 244: 240: 236: 232: 222: 218: 215: 212: 208: 204: 200: 197: 194: 191: 188: 185: 182: 179: 176: 172: 169: 168:Find sources: 164: 161: 155: 151: 147: 143: 138: 134: 129: 125: 121: 117: 113: 112: 108: 105: 102: 98: 95: 93: 90: 88: 85: 84: 83: 81: 76: 69: 66: 64: 63: 59: 55: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 935: 933: 917: 908: 890:Concertmusic 851:Concertmusic 836:Concertmusic 831: 814: 802: 794: 787: 763: 737: 729: 703: 678: 661: 643: 606: 575:WP:INTERVIEW 570:, ditto for 538: 405: 384: 370: 343: 228: 216: 210: 202: 195: 189: 183: 177: 167: 73: 50:no consensus 49: 47: 31: 28: 730:Weak delete 704:Weak delete 426:WP:NOEFFORT 422:WP:PRESERVE 231:User:Rtkat3 193:free images 863:reply here 760:WP:NOTPLOT 591:reply here 376:Jhenderson 331:reply here 308:reply here 285:reply here 262:reply here 940:talk page 819:Toughpigs 251:WP:BEFORE 54:Barkeep49 37:talk page 942:or in a 720:contribs 649:Rhino131 235:User:TTN 160:View log 101:glossary 39:or in a 769:ZXCVBNM 710:Elmidae 689:ZXCVBNM 565:DComics 199:WP refs 187:scholar 133:protect 128:history 78:New to 913:WP:GNG 909:Delete 788:Delete 679:Delete 666:Haleth 631:Rtkat3 546:knight 424:, and 418:WP:ATD 410:WP:GNG 389:WP:GNG 385:Delete 344:Delete 239:WP:GNG 171:Google 137:delete 214:JSTOR 175:books 154:views 146:watch 142:links 16:< 922:5969 919:Onel 894:talk 840:talk 832:Keep 823:talk 815:Keep 773:TALK 716:talk 693:TALK 670:talk 662:Keep 653:talk 644:Keep 635:talk 621:and 607:Keep 551:2149 541:Dark 406:Keep 397:talk 371:Keep 360:talk 207:FENS 181:news 150:logs 124:talk 120:edit 58:talk 393:TTN 221:TWL 158:– ( 896:) 888:-- 842:) 825:) 762:. 744:🍁 718:· 707:-- 672:) 655:) 637:) 629:-- 420:, 399:) 391:. 362:) 323:. 300:. 277:. 201:) 152:| 148:| 144:| 140:| 135:| 131:| 126:| 122:| 60:) 52:. 892:( 860:| 853:: 849:@ 838:( 821:( 805:C 801:· 797:T 775:) 771:( 722:) 714:( 695:) 691:( 668:( 651:( 633:( 627:: 623:@ 619:: 615:@ 588:| 577:( 428:. 395:( 358:( 328:| 305:| 282:| 259:| 225:) 217:· 211:· 203:· 196:· 190:· 184:· 178:· 173:( 165:( 162:) 156:) 118:( 103:) 99:( 56:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Barkeep49
talk
03:07, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Seven Deadly Enemies of Man

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
Seven Deadly Enemies of Man
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Google
books
news
scholar
free images

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.