338:
from my own account? I do not see what is the point stating that the editor (me) is related to the article if I have provided all reliable sources and wrote it from the independent point of view. Could you please delete those two comments from the other two articles? If you want to check the validity of the statements, you have all the sources please go ahead and check them, but it makes no sense to write that as the editor is related to the subject than maybe it is not trustworthy information. The last result (triangle) was obtained 2 months ago. I simply shared it because it is extremely useful new method. It makes no sense to call it a self-made result, because it was published in
Springer, which means it was approved by professionals as a scientific work. It also makes no sense to explain why is it important (secondary souces can be added later on, no need to delete the article). Please try to understand the content, I am sure you will see my point. Thank you very much for your time and comments.
368:
a more stringent criteria is needed. So we require "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". Papers by the author don't count as they are not independent. For academics this will mean lots of other people will have cited the work. It is impossible to gauge whether there will be significant coverage in third party sources when a paper has not yet appeared in print. Maybe in a few years time this paper will attract this coverage but it is too soon now. Documenting you fathers achievements is a worthy thing to do, but wikipedia is not the place. I personally have a page on my website listing all my fathers research work. There I can keep it without worrying about other people editing or deleting the page. --
367:
you will see the criteria for inclusion in wikipedia. It is a higher bar than many would like but is set high to keep the encyclopedia to a manageable size. Even in mathematics there is in the order of 100,000 papers published each year, it would be impossible to have articles on all of these. Hence
337:
Dear David, yes you are right. I have contributed only to these 3 articles, I would like to contribute to some other articles also, but even these 3 articles took a lot of time. These were my father's life-long results achieved during more than 20 years starting from 1997. Is it bad that I shared it
207:
246:. Note also the similarity of the article creator with the name of the author of the primary reference, and the fact that the same editor has mainly contributed to this and the two other articles
331:
160:
201:
271:
107:
92:
133:
128:
167:
137:
120:
242:"It is a new result (2018), that's why secondary sources are not available at this point of time." Without secondary sources, it does not pass
348:
301:. This could be a self-made mathematical construct, as it appears at least one major contributor is close to the subject. It also fails
58:
222:
189:
356:
263:
87:
80:
17:
420:
183:
425:
396:
377:
314:
282:
101:
97:
62:
179:
442:
40:
259:
124:
229:
251:
352:
116:
68:
438:
327:
36:
392:
373:
364:
344:
195:
255:
215:
339:
310:
239:
416:
405:
298:
275:
76:
53:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
437:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
323:
388:
369:
247:
306:
302:
243:
410:
294:
154:
433:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
305:
and likely any other notability policy that could apply here.
408:. Needs traction in the field and the literature first. --
150:
146:
142:
214:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
445:). No further edits should be made to this page.
272:list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions
270:Note: This discussion has been included in the
228:
8:
108:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
342:
269:
238:In the words of the article creator,
7:
24:
387:too soon to gauge notability. --
93:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
426:09:40, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
63:20:17, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
1:
397:07:16, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
378:07:16, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
357:20:31, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
332:18:30, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
315:18:10, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
283:18:02, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
264:17:59, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
83:(AfD)? Read these primers!
462:
435:Please do not modify it.
67:
32:Please do not modify it.
252:Sedrakyan's inequality
81:Articles for deletion
365:Knowledge:Notability
117:Sedrakyan's triangle
69:Sedrakyan's triangle
322:per all the above.
424:
359:
347:comment added by
285:
98:Guide to deletion
88:How to contribute
453:
414:
413:
280:
233:
232:
218:
170:
158:
140:
78:
34:
461:
460:
456:
455:
454:
452:
451:
450:
449:
443:deletion review
409:
363:If you look at
297:, specifically
276:
248:Nairi Sedrakyan
175:
166:
131:
115:
112:
75:
72:
61:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
459:
457:
448:
447:
429:
428:
399:
381:
380:
335:
334:
317:
287:
286:
256:David Eppstein
236:
235:
172:
111:
110:
105:
95:
90:
73:
71:
66:
57:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
458:
446:
444:
440:
436:
431:
430:
427:
422:
418:
412:
407:
403:
400:
398:
394:
390:
386:
383:
382:
379:
375:
371:
366:
362:
361:
360:
358:
354:
350:
349:74.93.254.249
346:
341:
333:
329:
325:
321:
318:
316:
312:
308:
304:
300:
296:
292:
289:
288:
284:
281:
279:
273:
268:
267:
266:
265:
261:
257:
253:
249:
245:
241:
231:
227:
224:
221:
217:
213:
209:
206:
203:
200:
197:
194:
191:
188:
185:
181:
178:
177:Find sources:
173:
169:
165:
162:
156:
152:
148:
144:
139:
135:
130:
126:
122:
118:
114:
113:
109:
106:
103:
99:
96:
94:
91:
89:
86:
85:
84:
82:
77:
70:
65:
64:
60:
59:contributions
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
434:
432:
401:
384:
343:— Preceding
336:
319:
290:
278:CAPTAIN RAJU
277:
237:
225:
219:
211:
204:
198:
192:
186:
176:
163:
74:
54:Patar knight
49:
47:
31:
28:
202:free images
406:WP:TOOSOON
389:Salix alba
370:Salix alba
324:XOR'easter
299:WP:PRIMARY
439:talk page
37:talk page
441:or in a
421:contribs
345:unsigned
307:Kirbanzo
161:View log
102:glossary
39:or in a
411:Elmidae
208:WP refs
196:scholar
134:protect
129:history
79:New to
402:Delete
385:Delete
340:HaykHS
320:Delete
303:WP:GNG
291:Delete
244:WP:GNG
240:HaykHS
180:Google
138:delete
50:delete
295:WP:OR
223:JSTOR
184:books
168:Stats
155:views
147:watch
143:links
52:. --
16:<
417:talk
393:talk
374:talk
353:talk
328:talk
311:talk
260:talk
250:and
216:FENS
190:news
151:logs
125:talk
121:edit
395:):
376:):
254:. —
230:TWL
159:– (
56:- /
419:·
404:-
355:)
330:)
313:)
293:-
274:.
262:)
210:)
153:|
149:|
145:|
141:|
136:|
132:|
127:|
123:|
423:)
415:(
391:(
372:(
351:(
326:(
309:(
258:(
234:)
226:·
220:·
212:·
205:·
199:·
193:·
187:·
182:(
174:(
171:)
164:·
157:)
119:(
104:)
100:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.