344:
Well I disagree with outright banning a whole news source. Its not hard to look at the article itself and evaluate it for what it is. And regardless, I just added another source to the page, which actually only added to the notability of the subject. He apparently was in charge of the development of
412:
The source in question is no longer used in the article. I've added six sources to the article now, two of which directly replace the spot where the questionable one was located. So since both the notability and reliability concerns have been completely addressed, I believe that the original
314:
I'm not sure if you understand how sourcing works. That article sourced direct interviews with relevant people. IGN is not going to publish incorrect information. Flag this article as needing more sources if you must, but this is definitely not delete worthy.
207:
238:
Nominating this for deletion due to the subject matter not being notable by himself. Also the reference used for the article is from a unreliable source according to the Video Game
Project.
373:
Sorry I did not realize that. After doing some more reading on the process I am going to suggest for a speedy keep of the article and for the nominator to withdraw their deletion request.
398:
You might want to edit your reason why then, as what you have there currently is incorrect. You have to justify why it is still up for deletion with the new changes taken into account.
252:
160:
269:
201:
107:
92:
289:. I fixed the link and it is to IGN now, which is a reliable source for gaming news. And being the founder of Simtex is definitely notable.
167:
432:
431:
What are the six sources? It would help determine if the article should be kept if we know if the new sources are reliable or not.--
445:
There is an article from
Polygon, two from Gamespot, one from IGN, and one from Business Wire. Also through in a published book.
133:
128:
60:
137:
87:
80:
17:
222:
345:
Metroid Prime. Since both your notability and reliability claim have been addressed, I am removing the flag for deletion.
120:
189:
553:
Five sources directly related to the guy isn't enough to make him notable? You gotta support your argument there a bit.
330:
101:
97:
359:
That's not how this works at all. Once the discussion is closed, and if the article is kept THEN it can be removed.
485:
581:
544:
364:
40:
527:
183:
436:
179:
577:
562:
558:
548:
531:
519:
502:
454:
450:
440:
426:
422:
407:
403:
393:
382:
378:
368:
354:
350:
339:
324:
320:
309:
298:
294:
278:
261:
244:
62:
36:
540:
388:
360:
334:
304:
273:
256:
239:
58:
229:
523:
215:
124:
76:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
576:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
554:
515:
446:
418:
399:
374:
346:
316:
290:
496:
329:
There is actual consensus with the Video Game
Project to not use these types of articles.
195:
53:
413:
complaints around this article are now invalid. I am officially switching my vote to
387:
I would much rather get a consensus on whether this should stay up or get deleted.
116:
68:
154:
303:
The IGN link still cites N-Sider, which makes the link an unreliable source.
514:
Confused why this has been relisted. It's pretty obviously notable.
52:. The discussion seems to have started going round in circles here.
572:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
488:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
150:
146:
142:
214:
494:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -
253:
list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions
522:) 19:51, 2 December 2019 (UTC) STRIKING 2ND !VOTE.
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
584:). No further edits should be made to this page.
270:list of Video games-related deletion discussions
268:Note: This discussion has been included in the
251:Note: This discussion has been included in the
228:
8:
108:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
267:
250:
539:the company may be notable but he is not.
7:
24:
93:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
532:14:09, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
455:07:25, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
441:05:05, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
427:20:09, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
408:19:36, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
394:19:20, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
383:18:48, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
369:18:21, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
355:18:03, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
340:17:14, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
325:17:07, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
310:15:58, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
299:17:07, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
279:05:08, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
262:05:08, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
245:05:08, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
63:14:12, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
563:20:35, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
549:18:58, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
503:11:13, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
83:(AfD)? Read these primers!
601:
574:Please do not modify it.
331:All the way back in 2011
32:Please do not modify it.
81:Articles for deletion
541:John Pack Lambert
505:
281:
264:
98:Guide to deletion
88:How to contribute
592:
501:
493:
491:
489:
391:
337:
307:
276:
259:
242:
233:
232:
218:
170:
158:
140:
78:
34:
600:
599:
595:
594:
593:
591:
590:
589:
588:
582:deletion review
506:
495:
484:
482:
389:
361:RickinBaltimore
335:
305:
274:
257:
240:
175:
166:
131:
115:
112:
75:
72:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
598:
596:
587:
586:
568:
567:
566:
565:
534:
524:Britishfinance
492:
481:
480:
479:
478:
477:
476:
475:
474:
473:
472:
471:
470:
469:
468:
467:
466:
465:
464:
463:
462:
461:
460:
459:
458:
457:
283:
282:
265:
236:
235:
172:
111:
110:
105:
95:
90:
73:
71:
66:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
597:
585:
583:
579:
575:
570:
569:
564:
560:
556:
552:
551:
550:
546:
542:
538:
535:
533:
529:
525:
521:
517:
513:
512:
508:
507:
504:
500:
499:
490:
487:
456:
452:
448:
444:
443:
442:
438:
434:
433:69.157.252.96
430:
429:
428:
424:
420:
417:on this one.
416:
411:
410:
409:
405:
401:
397:
396:
395:
392:
386:
385:
384:
380:
376:
372:
371:
370:
366:
362:
358:
357:
356:
352:
348:
343:
342:
341:
338:
332:
328:
327:
326:
322:
318:
313:
312:
311:
308:
302:
301:
300:
296:
292:
288:
285:
284:
280:
277:
271:
266:
263:
260:
254:
249:
248:
247:
246:
243:
231:
227:
224:
221:
217:
213:
209:
206:
203:
200:
197:
194:
191:
188:
185:
181:
178:
177:Find sources:
173:
169:
165:
162:
156:
152:
148:
144:
139:
135:
130:
126:
122:
118:
114:
113:
109:
106:
103:
99:
96:
94:
91:
89:
86:
85:
84:
82:
77:
70:
67:
65:
64:
61:
59:
57:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
573:
571:
536:
510:
509:
497:
483:
414:
286:
237:
225:
219:
211:
204:
198:
192:
186:
176:
163:
117:Steve Barcia
74:
69:Steve Barcia
54:
50:no consensus
49:
47:
31:
28:
555:Bluedude588
516:Bluedude588
447:Bluedude588
419:Bluedude588
415:Speedy Keep
400:Bluedude588
375:Bluedude588
347:Bluedude588
317:Bluedude588
291:Bluedude588
202:free images
511:Still Keep
390:GamerPro64
336:GamerPro64
306:GamerPro64
275:GamerPro64
258:GamerPro64
241:GamerPro64
55:Ritchie333
578:talk page
37:talk page
580:or in a
486:Relisted
161:View log
102:glossary
39:or in a
208:WP refs
196:scholar
134:protect
129:history
79:New to
537:Delete
180:Google
138:delete
498:Nahal
223:JSTOR
184:books
168:Stats
155:views
147:watch
143:links
16:<
559:talk
545:talk
528:talk
520:talk
451:talk
437:talk
423:talk
404:talk
379:talk
365:talk
351:talk
321:talk
295:talk
287:Keep
216:FENS
190:news
151:logs
125:talk
121:edit
230:TWL
159:– (
561:)
547:)
530:)
453:)
439:)
425:)
406:)
381:)
367:)
353:)
333:.
323:)
297:)
272:.
255:.
210:)
153:|
149:|
145:|
141:|
136:|
132:|
127:|
123:|
557:(
543:(
526:(
518:(
449:(
435:(
421:(
402:(
377:(
363:(
349:(
319:(
293:(
234:)
226:·
220:·
212:·
205:·
199:·
193:·
187:·
182:(
174:(
171:)
164:·
157:)
119:(
104:)
100:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.