Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/SuperMarioLogan - Knowledge

Source 📝

686:
state the subject "must have made innovative contributions in associated field of entertainment," "have a large fan base or significant 'cult' following," "must have been independently discussed" and "does not need a fixated quantity of reliable sources." Nearly every source puts primary focus on the
228:
Speedy deleted four times between 2014 and 2017. The small handful of 3rd party reliable sources don't have sufficient depth of coverage to qualify for general notability; nearly all are simply mentions a character from the series as an example of content parents shouldn't be allowing their children
612:
notable. His content made a kid put a noose around his neck because the kid mimicked it. Although I checked the references again, and I saw some unreliable ones, and your comment makes sense, so I change my vote to abstain. Hopefully someone can make a better bio of him
197: 366: 229:
to see. The only reference with any kind of depth is from deadlinenews.co.uk, which rather than being to credited to one of their reporters is credited to "guest," thus failing under
832:
Hello Trevortnidesserped! Looking at your draft, I'm inclined to agree with you that the subject passes the general notability guideline and the notability guideline for entertainers
424: 340: 158: 395: 191: 453: 573: 485:
The Early life content (medical conditions) does not contribute to notability, nor does paying for a dinner with Brady. This leaves little in the article.
105: 90: 751:— I cant find three solid reliable sources that proves subject of our discussion merits a standalone at this point in time. So I totally support 577: 556:
the notion that there are "good citations" here is silly and also the idea that controversy automatically = notability is equally ridiculous.
131: 126: 135: 880: 581: 569: 118: 85: 78: 17: 212: 179: 842: 712: 515: 318: 639: 618: 544: 530: 99: 95: 230: 561: 904: 173: 40: 662: 299: 557: 887: 846: 838: 810: 785: 766: 739: 723: 716: 708: 700: 696: 688: 666: 643: 635: 622: 614: 596: 548: 540: 526: 511: 494: 474: 445: 416: 387: 356: 322: 314: 303: 291: 276: 244: 169: 60: 863: 762: 241: 122: 900: 490: 36: 219: 258: 876: 780: 735: 704: 592: 348: 332: 270: 114: 66: 525:
Good citations, notable personality, and is controversial enough to stand out with other youtubers.
658: 295: 205: 568:, it's a guest post to a blog that isn't reliable (and even if it were, it's a passing mention), 336: 285: 263: 804: 757: 752: 235: 74: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
899:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
185: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
486: 868: 859: 775: 731: 588: 536: 344: 54: 687:
subject. Whether the sources are to few people's fancy-dancy standards is irrelevant.
257:(pinging for input) convinced me it was worthy, hence the AfC publish. Also relevant; 823: 794: 683: 679: 584: 507: 503: 800: 253:: I had initially declined the article as I too was dubious of the notability, but 152: 703:, among others, provide good enough points to support the need for an article on 827: 692: 580:
in a local paper isn't exactly the type of in depth journalism we look for,
462: 433: 404: 375: 254: 608:- Now I never meant if it's controversial, than it's notable, but this guy 261:
has been created and deleted 5 times since this title's salting in 2017 —
565: 576:
which is admittedly okay but hardly in depth coverage of the subject,
313:
Several independent links at the bottom, meets notability standards.
726:
You only get one !vote and you already gave it above. They aren't
560:
is a puffy feel good piece and akin to gossip, it has no depth.
895:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
634:
true that someone imitated Jeffy's moves and passed away. --
367:
list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions
826:; There is no guidance to support that claim, and a user 678:
Has been covered numerous times by well known websites,
831: 657:
If it is deleted, then it will 100% need to be salted.
148: 144: 140: 204: 341:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 December 7
425:list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions 830:with 7 years more experience has said otherwise " 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 907:). No further edits should be made to this page. 452:Note: This discussion has been included in the 423:Note: This discussion has been included in the 396:list of Video games-related deletion discussions 394:Note: This discussion has been included in the 365:Note: This discussion has been included in the 510:, several reliable resources in citation box. 454:list of Internet-related deletion discussions 218: 8: 106:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 793:Per nom and analysis by Praxidicae, fails 451: 422: 393: 364: 836:(Look at the message at the very bottom.) 294:was recreated to the point of saiting. 7: 231:news org reliable sources guidelines 24: 730:standards, they are Wikipedias. 91:Introduction to deletion process 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 533:) 17:15, 7 December 2020 (UTC) 1: 888:16:00, 13 December 2020 (UTC) 847:19:54, 10 December 2020 (UTC) 811:09:05, 10 December 2020 (UTC) 707:, deletion is not necessary. 518:) 1:45, 7 December 2020 (UTC) 339:). I have transcluded it to 61:16:45, 14 December 2020 (UTC) 786:03:51, 9 December 2020 (UTC) 767:23:46, 7 December 2020 (UTC) 740:20:36, 7 December 2020 (UTC) 717:20:32, 7 December 2020 (UTC) 667:19:40, 7 December 2020 (UTC) 644:22:26, 7 December 2020 (UTC) 623:22:22, 7 December 2020 (UTC) 597:19:34, 7 December 2020 (UTC) 549:22:22, 7 December 2020 (UTC) 495:09:07, 7 December 2020 (UTC) 475:05:53, 7 December 2020 (UTC) 446:05:53, 7 December 2020 (UTC) 417:05:53, 7 December 2020 (UTC) 388:05:53, 7 December 2020 (UTC) 357:03:52, 7 December 2020 (UTC) 323:03:35, 7 December 2020 (UTC) 304:19:28, 7 December 2020 (UTC) 277:03:34, 7 December 2020 (UTC) 245:03:27, 7 December 2020 (UTC) 574:this is a perspective piece 331:This AfD was not correctly 81:(AfD)? Read these primers! 924: 582:and this is just blatantly 578:a three paragraph warning 897:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 292:Draft:Logan Thirtyacre 535:See my comment below 79:Articles for deletion 839:Trevortnidesserpedx 709:Trevortnidesserpedx 570:this isn't coverage 724:Trevortnidesserped 697:Royal Autumn Crest 512:Trevortnidesserped 329:Automated comment: 315:Royal Autumn Crest 808: 477: 472: 460: 448: 443: 431: 419: 414: 402: 390: 385: 373: 359: 355: 96:Guide to deletion 86:How to contribute 915: 886: 884: 871: 837: 799: 783: 778: 473: 470: 469: 467: 458: 444: 441: 440: 438: 429: 415: 412: 411: 409: 400: 386: 383: 382: 380: 371: 351: 350:Talk to my owner 346: 327: 289: 268: 259:Logan Thirtyacre 239: 223: 222: 208: 156: 138: 76: 59: 57: 34: 923: 922: 918: 917: 916: 914: 913: 912: 911: 905:deletion review 885: 874: 869: 867: 864:WP:RUNOFTHEMILL 862:. Definitely a 835: 809: 781: 776: 628:Another comment 463: 461: 457: 434: 432: 428: 405: 403: 399: 376: 374: 370: 354: 349: 283: 275: 262: 237: 165: 129: 115:SuperMarioLogan 113: 110: 73: 70: 67:SuperMarioLogan 55: 53: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 921: 919: 910: 909: 891: 890: 873: 852: 851: 850: 849: 822:Does not fail 814: 813: 798: 788: 769: 745: 744: 743: 742: 720: 719: 670: 669: 659:4thfile4thrank 651: 650: 649: 648: 647: 646: 630:- Although it 600: 599: 551: 519: 497: 479: 478: 449: 420: 391: 361: 360: 347: 325: 307: 306: 296:4thfile4thrank 280: 279: 269: 226: 225: 162: 109: 108: 103: 93: 88: 71: 69: 64: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 920: 908: 906: 902: 898: 893: 892: 889: 882: 878: 872: 865: 861: 857: 854: 853: 848: 844: 840: 833: 829: 825: 821: 818: 817: 816: 815: 812: 806: 802: 796: 792: 789: 787: 784: 779: 773: 770: 768: 764: 760: 759: 754: 750: 747: 746: 741: 737: 733: 729: 725: 722: 721: 718: 714: 710: 706: 702: 698: 694: 690: 685: 681: 677: 674: 673: 672: 671: 668: 664: 660: 656: 653: 652: 645: 641: 637: 633: 629: 626: 625: 624: 620: 616: 611: 607: 604: 603: 602: 601: 598: 594: 590: 586: 583: 579: 575: 571: 567: 563: 559: 555: 552: 550: 546: 542: 538: 534: 532: 528: 523: 520: 517: 513: 509: 505: 501: 498: 496: 492: 488: 484: 481: 480: 476: 468: 466: 455: 450: 447: 439: 437: 426: 421: 418: 410: 408: 397: 392: 389: 381: 379: 368: 363: 362: 358: 352: 345: 342: 338: 334: 330: 326: 324: 320: 316: 312: 309: 308: 305: 301: 297: 293: 287: 282: 281: 278: 274: 273: 267: 266: 260: 256: 252: 249: 248: 247: 246: 243: 242: 240: 232: 221: 217: 214: 211: 207: 203: 199: 196: 193: 190: 187: 184: 181: 178: 175: 171: 168: 167:Find sources: 163: 160: 154: 150: 146: 142: 137: 133: 128: 124: 120: 116: 112: 111: 107: 104: 101: 97: 94: 92: 89: 87: 84: 83: 82: 80: 75: 68: 65: 63: 62: 58: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 896: 894: 855: 819: 790: 771: 758:Celestina007 756: 753:OhNoitsJamie 748: 727: 675: 654: 631: 627: 609: 605: 553: 524: 521: 499: 482: 464: 435: 406: 377: 335:to the log ( 328: 310: 271: 264: 250: 234: 227: 215: 209: 201: 194: 188: 182: 176: 166: 72: 49: 47: 31: 28: 755:’s stance. 487:David notMD 333:transcluded 192:free images 860:Praxidicae 732:Praxidicae 589:Praxidicae 585:unreliable 537:Praxidicae 901:talk page 774:per nom. 37:talk page 903:or in a 881:ICE CUBE 777:Namcokid 636:a gd fan 615:a gd fan 566:Deadline 541:a gd fan 527:a gd fan 238:itsJamie 159:View log 100:glossary 39:or in a 870:ASTIG😎 820:Comment 801:ZXCVBNM 676:Comment 606:Comment 564:is not 522:Abstain 502:passes 353::Online 251:Neutral 198:WP refs 186:scholar 132:protect 127:history 77:New to 858:: Per 856:Delete 824:WP:GNG 795:WP:GNG 791:Delete 772:Delete 749:Delete 554:Delete 508:WP:ENT 504:WP:GNG 483:Delete 337:step 3 170:Google 136:delete 50:delete 877:ICE T 705:Logan 701:GDFan 655:Note: 539:'s -- 290:ALso 286:IVORK 265:IVORK 213:JSTOR 174:books 153:views 145:watch 141:links 16:< 843:talk 805:TALK 763:talk 736:talk 713:talk 693:Sdkb 682:and 663:talk 640:talk 619:talk 593:talk 562:this 558:This 545:talk 531:talk 516:talk 506:and 500:Keep 491:talk 465:Sdkb 459:{{u| 436:Sdkb 430:{{u| 407:Sdkb 401:{{u| 378:Sdkb 372:{{u| 343:. — 319:talk 311:Keep 300:talk 272:Talk 255:Sdkb 236:OhNo 206:FENS 180:news 149:logs 123:talk 119:edit 56:czar 834:." 684:GNG 680:ENT 220:TWL 157:– ( 879:• 866:. 845:) 782:47 765:) 738:) 728:my 715:) 699:, 695:, 691:, 665:) 642:) 632:is 621:) 613:-- 610:is 595:) 587:. 572:, 547:) 493:) 471:}} 456:. 442:}} 427:. 413:}} 398:. 384:}} 369:. 321:) 302:) 233:. 200:) 151:| 147:| 143:| 139:| 134:| 130:| 125:| 121:| 52:. 883:) 875:( 841:( 828:* 807:) 803:( 797:. 761:( 734:( 711:( 689:I 661:( 638:( 617:( 591:( 543:( 529:( 514:( 489:( 317:( 298:( 288:: 284:@ 224:) 216:· 210:· 202:· 195:· 189:· 183:· 177:· 172:( 164:( 161:) 155:) 117:( 102:) 98:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
czar
16:45, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
SuperMarioLogan

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
SuperMarioLogan
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.