307:
brought up to any reasonable standard without basically gutting the article, an act that would probably be considered bad faith since I've advocated deletion in the past and failed. I still have serious doubts that this is a distinct enough topic for a standalone article, but I can envision that one could be created if it truly is something that is defined as a distinct symptom or phenomenon within an accepted field of study. If this AfD closes delete, I would not be opposed to the recreation of a more scholarly treatment of the topic that started over from scratch, if you can find sources to support such a thing. If it closes keep, I urge you or any neutral editor to make the drastic edits necessary to rid this article of it's protologism "disorder" roots. Thanks.
52:. No one outside of the nominator has called for the article's deletion, and the majority of the consensus favors keeping the article; BDD's point that the subject is the topic of scholarly literature is the strongest for keeping it here. The one call for a redirect is an intelligent suggestion, and perhaps it can be brought up on the article's talk page (considering that repeated calls for deletion haven't worked). A non-admin closure.
227:
difficult to find a scattering of sources using the phrase "work aversion" or "aversion to work", but they largely are just using it as a descriptive phrase with the common
English meaning, not as a term of art. When searching for sources, note that the original version of this article, or variations of it, are found on many "low quality search keyword content" sites, such as
306:
You do point out a solid argument for blowing it up and possibly starting over. I and a couple other editors have made little edits to remove the more outrageous claims and bad refs over the 3 years since the last AfD, but every time I load the page, I really get stuck on how it could possibly be
346:
be written under this title, it would constantly be straining against the
Puritanical bias inherent in the title. Lack of motivation, defeatism, and anxiety are common symptoms to many mood disorders, and there's plenty to say about their sociological and psychological effects. However, talking
226:
This article was originally created to describe something called "Work
Aversion Disorder", which is not a recognized disorder. After it was challenged at AfD, it morphed into a general article on a supposed phenomenon of "work aversion", and was kept on what I consider weak grounds. It is not
379:"The subject is real" isn't a very strong reason to keep either. Obviously "pain aversion" is a real thing, but we don't have an article on that, and probably shouldn't. You could write articles on "<anything negative: -->
93:
195:
364:
It's not a great article, but it's discussing a real concept that's discussed in scholarly literature. That it's not widely recognized as a disorder is no reason to delete, given the coverage of the topic.
83:
78:
402:
You're focusing on the wrong part of my comment. The article should be kept not (primarily) because it covers a real concept, but because that concept has been discussed in multiple scholarly sources. --
271:). But none of that has to do with "Work Aversion Disorder", and the fact that the article as it stands is still married to that legacy makes the odds of substantive improvement seem foreboding.
88:
289:
148:
253:, too. There are real sources for work aversion, including scholarly discussion of the topic from economic, sociological, and psychiatric perspectives (I've got references from
330:, which seems to be what it's describing. I understand what S.O. is saying, but I think it might be better to work that information into proper medical articles, such as
189:
155:
347:
about them in terms of how unproductive they make worker drones and disrupt the nature order of the universe just doesn't seem very encyclopedic.
230:, and since such sources are derived from the original Knowledge (XXG) article, they should not be considered evidence of notability.
17:
121:
116:
125:
438:
411:
389:
374:
356:
316:
296:
280:
239:
61:
108:
210:
276:
177:
57:
267:
457:
40:
339:
352:
255:
335:
272:
171:
53:
167:
453:
348:
293:
36:
217:
203:
327:
112:
434:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
452:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
250:
183:
385:
312:
235:
407:
370:
331:
261:
104:
67:
430:
426:
228:
142:
381:
308:
231:
403:
366:
446:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
94:
Articles for deletion/Work aversion disorder (2nd nomination)
138:
134:
130:
202:
84:
Articles for deletion/Work aversion (4th nomination)
79:
Articles for deletion/Work aversion (3rd nomination)
290:
list of Social science-related deletion discussions
216:
342:, etc. Although I can see how a credible article
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
460:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
288:Note: This debate has been included in the
89:Articles for deletion/Work aversion disorder
287:
76:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
74:
24:
1:
380:aversion" under that logic.
439:21:24, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
412:18:18, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
390:18:15, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
375:18:01, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
357:21:52, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
317:17:26, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
297:20:15, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
281:20:04, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
240:17:59, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
62:13:20, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
425:- sounds like a variety of
340:passive-aggressive behavior
477:
256:Journal of Economic Issues
336:major depressive disorder
249:, but I could be sold on
449:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
73:AfDs for this article:
273:Squeamish Ossifrage
54:And Adoil Descended
328:Sloth (deadly sin)
268:Psychopharmacology
299:
468:
451:
349:NinjaRobotPirate
294:Northamerica1000
221:
220:
206:
158:
146:
128:
48:The result was
34:
476:
475:
471:
470:
469:
467:
466:
465:
464:
458:deletion review
447:
163:
154:
119:
103:
100:
98:
71:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
474:
472:
463:
462:
442:
441:
419:
418:
417:
416:
415:
414:
395:
394:
393:
392:
359:
321:
320:
319:
301:
300:
284:
283:
224:
223:
160:
99:
97:
96:
91:
86:
81:
75:
72:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
473:
461:
459:
455:
450:
444:
443:
440:
436:
432:
428:
424:
421:
420:
413:
409:
405:
401:
400:
399:
398:
397:
396:
391:
387:
383:
378:
377:
376:
372:
368:
363:
360:
358:
354:
350:
345:
341:
337:
333:
332:mood disorder
329:
325:
322:
318:
314:
310:
305:
304:
303:
302:
298:
295:
291:
286:
285:
282:
278:
274:
270:
269:
264:
263:
262:Social Forces
258:
257:
252:
248:
244:
243:
242:
241:
237:
233:
229:
219:
215:
212:
209:
205:
201:
197:
194:
191:
188:
185:
182:
179:
176:
173:
169:
166:
165:Find sources:
161:
157:
153:
150:
144:
140:
136:
132:
127:
123:
118:
114:
110:
106:
105:Work aversion
102:
101:
95:
92:
90:
87:
85:
82:
80:
77:
69:
68:Work aversion
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
448:
445:
427:presenteeism
422:
361:
343:
323:
266:
260:
254:
246:
225:
213:
207:
199:
192:
186:
180:
174:
164:
151:
49:
47:
31:
28:
190:free images
454:talk page
247:Weak keep
37:talk page
456:or in a
324:Redirect
149:View log
39:or in a
431:Bearian
196:WP refs
184:scholar
122:protect
117:history
265:, and
168:Google
126:delete
344:could
245:Ugh.
211:JSTOR
172:books
156:Stats
143:views
135:watch
131:links
16:<
435:talk
423:Keep
408:talk
386:talk
382:Gigs
371:talk
362:Keep
353:talk
313:talk
309:Gigs
277:talk
236:talk
232:Gigs
204:FENS
178:news
139:logs
113:talk
109:edit
58:talk
50:Keep
404:BDD
367:BDD
326:to
251:TNT
218:TWL
147:– (
437:)
429:.
410:)
388:)
373:)
365:--
355:)
338:,
334:,
315:)
292:.
279:)
259:,
238:)
198:)
141:|
137:|
133:|
129:|
124:|
120:|
115:|
111:|
60:)
433:(
406:(
384:(
369:(
351:(
311:(
275:(
234:(
222:)
214:·
208:·
200:·
193:·
187:·
181:·
175:·
170:(
162:(
159:)
152:·
145:)
107:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.