386:- this nomination isn't intended as disruption, it's genuinely in good faith. I honestly don't feel that this article meets our current notability criteria. However, consensus seems to be against me so far, so if no one else agrees on this one, I'd have no problem seeing this AFD closed early as a 'speedy keep'.
344:
standard is that content is verifiable (basic policy) and that the encyclopedia is useful to readers. If an error is made with regard to some notability guideline, as to where the exact boundary is, it's harmless. And, obviously, the community has had enough of this one. I'd recommend the nominator
339:
Let's not waste editor time beating a dead horse, researching what others have researched to death. It's not like the previous AfDs were marginal, and there was some opinion that the AfDs were disruptive. If they'd been "no consensus," okay, maybe, but "no consensus" hasn't happened here since the
217:, but it is not immediately obvious that it would provide evidence of notability either. As it is, it appears that despite passing several previous AFDs, this site has not received enough coverage to pass the notability test, and the article should be deleted.
186:
197:) made me reconsider this article, which is about another 'Knowledge spin-off website'. It was once thought to pass our notability requirements, but I feel if judged today it would not. Specifically, it fails
471:- I assume nomination was in good faith, because nominator has demonstrated good faith by recognizing consensus against deletion. I support taking the nominator up on the suggestion to close as speedy keep.
113:
108:
103:
98:
93:
88:
83:
194:
174:
77:
71:
201:, the requirement of significant coverage in multiple, independent, reliable sources. Almost all of the references provided arguably only contain
215:
250:
453:
492:
Indeed, probably best not to drag this out any longer than necessary when consensus is already obvious. Consider my nomination withdrawn.
479:
17:
501:
483:
457:
444:
Shouldn't a vote to Delete an article that was previously Kept just mean that we should revert to the last Kept version? --
439:
413:
395:
378:
331:
314:
293:
272:
258:
244:
226:
54:
327:
141:
136:
145:
128:
518:
254:
36:
517:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
449:
426:
mean it should be kept this time. See the
Wikinfo AFD above, which was deleted on its 6th nomination. See also
323:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
205:
coverage: brief mentions of the site in articles that are really about
Knowledge or Jimbo Wales (for example:
212:
310:
182:
497:
435:
391:
289:
268:
240:
222:
181:
Oh boy... I know this is going to be controversial, but I think it has to be done. The recent AFDs of
476:
132:
493:
445:
431:
387:
218:
209:
340:
very first one. Notability doesn't die, by the way. Once notable, always notable. In the end, the
427:
306:
206:
124:
60:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
285:
264:
236:
472:
364:
28 September 2007 (5th) "early close as keep, no chance of this ending in anything else."
409:
374:
302:
198:
49:
352:
20 April 2006 Wikitruth (same as
Wikitruth.info, the page was moved.) No Consensus
162:
404:
I didn't intend to imply that it was, but that some might look at it that way. --
345:
withdraw it, quickly. And since I just looked at it, might as well summarize:
405:
370:
355:
10 October 2006 (2nd) "closed early and kept by overwhelming consensus."
422:
Also, the fact that it's been kept at AFD several times before doesn't
190:
322:. The references in the article are obviously not all that exist.
235:, I had no trouble at all finding detailed news coverage of this.
511:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
361:
7 June 2007 (4th) "speedy close as obvious disruption."
169:
158:
154:
150:
48:
nom withdrawn, no delete votes. Non-admin closure by
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
521:). No further edits should be made to this page.
114:Articles for deletion/Wikitruth (8th nomination)
109:Articles for deletion/Wikitruth (7th nomination)
104:Articles for deletion/Wikitruth (6th nomination)
99:Articles for deletion/Wikitruth (5th nomination)
94:Articles for deletion/Wikitruth (4th nomination)
89:Articles for deletion/Wikitruth (3rd nomination)
84:Articles for deletion/Wikitruth (2nd nomination)
358:29 April 2007 (3rd) "Speedy keep ... WP:SNOW."
214:). One of the articles is behind a pay wall
8:
301:It does appear to meet the requirement of
69:
305:. Not by much, but I think it passes.
7:
78:Articles for deletion/Wikitruth.info
67:
24:
72:Articles for deletion/Wikitruth
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
263:No, that's how easy it was.
538:
514:Please do not modify it.
502:04:15, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
484:02:41, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
458:03:11, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
440:02:15, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
414:03:18, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
396:02:13, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
379:01:48, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
332:01:29, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
315:01:27, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
294:01:06, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
273:01:43, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
259:01:18, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
245:01:02, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
227:00:45, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
55:05:28, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
183:Encyclopedia Dramatica
66:AfDs for this article:
324:Bramlet Abercrombie
44:The result was
482:
529:
516:
475:
172:
166:
148:
52:
34:
537:
536:
532:
531:
530:
528:
527:
526:
525:
519:deletion review
512:
251:137.111.143.140
249:Care to share?
168:
139:
123:
120:
118:
80:
64:
50:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
535:
533:
524:
523:
507:
506:
505:
504:
487:
486:
465:
464:
463:
462:
461:
460:
446:Damian Yerrick
419:
418:
417:
416:
399:
398:
367:
366:
365:
362:
359:
356:
353:
347:
346:
334:
317:
296:
279:
278:
277:
276:
275:
179:
178:
119:
117:
116:
111:
106:
101:
96:
91:
86:
81:
76:
74:
68:
65:
63:
58:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
534:
522:
520:
515:
509:
508:
503:
499:
495:
491:
490:
489:
488:
485:
481:
478:
474:
470:
467:
466:
459:
455:
451:
447:
443:
442:
441:
437:
433:
429:
425:
424:automatically
421:
420:
415:
411:
407:
403:
402:
401:
400:
397:
393:
389:
385:
382:
381:
380:
376:
372:
368:
363:
360:
357:
354:
351:
350:
349:
348:
343:
338:
335:
333:
329:
325:
321:
318:
316:
312:
308:
307:Seventhofnine
304:
300:
297:
295:
291:
287:
283:
280:
274:
270:
266:
262:
261:
260:
256:
252:
248:
247:
246:
242:
238:
234:
231:
230:
229:
228:
224:
220:
216:
213:
210:
207:
204:
200:
196:
192:
188:
184:
176:
171:
164:
160:
156:
152:
147:
143:
138:
134:
130:
126:
122:
121:
115:
112:
110:
107:
105:
102:
100:
97:
95:
92:
90:
87:
85:
82:
79:
75:
73:
70:
62:
59:
57:
56:
53:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
513:
510:
468:
423:
383:
341:
336:
319:
298:
281:
232:
202:
180:
45:
43:
31:
28:
428:WP:NOTAGAIN
337:Speedy Keep
286:John Carter
284:per above.
265:WillOakland
237:WillOakland
193:(closed as
185:(closed as
473:JamesMLane
125:Wikitruth
61:Wikitruth
494:Terraxos
432:Terraxos
388:Terraxos
219:Terraxos
175:View log
51:Lenticel
384:Comment
203:trivial
191:Wikinfo
142:protect
137:history
303:WP:WEB
199:WP:WEB
195:delete
189:) and
170:delete
146:delete
454:stalk
173:) – (
163:views
155:watch
151:links
16:<
498:talk
469:Keep
450:talk
436:talk
410:talk
392:talk
375:talk
342:real
328:talk
320:Keep
311:talk
299:Keep
290:talk
282:Keep
269:talk
255:talk
241:talk
233:Keep
223:talk
187:keep
159:logs
133:talk
129:edit
46:Keep
406:Abd
371:Abd
500:)
456:)
452:|
438:)
430:.
412:)
394:)
377:)
369:--
330:)
313:)
292:)
271:)
257:)
243:)
225:)
211:,
208:,
161:|
157:|
153:|
149:|
144:|
140:|
135:|
131:|
496:(
480:c
477:t
448:(
434:(
408:(
390:(
373:(
326:(
309:(
288:(
267:(
253:(
239:(
221:(
177:)
167:(
165:)
127:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.