1133:âReliable" means that sources need editorial integrity to allow verifiable evaluation of notability, per the reliable source guideline. Sources may encompass published works in all forms and media, and in any language. âââAvailability of secondary sources covering the subject is a good test for notability.âââ "Sources" should be âââsecondary sourcesââ, as those provide the most objective evidence of notability. Multiple publications from the same author or organization are usually regarded as a single source for the purposes of establishing notability.
1159:, which underpins secure digital transactions every minute of every day the world over. Though the article about this special interest group could use some work it is still unambiguously notable. So although they are special interest group, who introduced a concept now broadly adopted and implemented by others, they are also a notable group, because they invented something so useful it is used by practically everyone all the time whether they know it or none.
700:, there are more for neurosexiam and neurofeminism, but that has nothing to do with the existence or relevance of this conference. If you believe neurosexism and neurofeminism to be encyclopedic, by all means to create articles about them and remove the redirects to this page, but that does not result in this conference being encyclopedic.
2024:
for being a "trivial mention" (it isn't), and because it "points to user generated content", which is apparently code for "cites the organization's website". It cites primary sources and discusses their content, making it a secondary source. That reference is not yet in the article, but it should be,
1816:
is more than enough to establish notability. I would also count the two sources from the
Neuroethics Blog, since that is the official site of an academic group â it is hosted under the auspices of a university and appears to operate with editorial oversight. Unlike many scientific organizations, even
1101:
Well I was hoping it would be self evident that there is very little material on this subject matter available and therefore its lack of notability should be obvious, but youâve started to call me name so be it. Iâll start evaluation every citation in and outside the article, using the criteria for
2029:
was cited â you state that you "can't actually establish why this was cited at all, maybe the page used to say something of not " â by clicking the collapsed section headings, one can reveal that it establishes the 2016 meeting was hosted at
Barnard College and provides commentary on how the group
1733:
An organization is not notable merely because a notable person or event was associated with it. A corporation is not notable merely because it owns notable subsidiaries. The organization or corporation itself must have been discussed in reliable independent sources for it to be considered notable.
237:
This article is about an organization, which studies a neologism for which there there is no consensus on terminology or definition. It uses words such as "neurosexism" and "neurofeminism" though these do not appear in the common lexicon and do not appear prevalent in related literature. it does
730:
if you believe the conference or organization meet wikipedia's criteria of notability for inclusion, then it logically follows that it must be about the genesis of these topics. If the topics are indeed notable, please establish the topics as separate articles articles, for which some secondary
1147:
A notable group should be able to answer some or all of the questions: What specifically do they do? What products/intellectual property do they produce? How has/is what they have done/are doing benefit humanity? How does what they do merit them being recorded in the record of human history?
1975:
Clarification, re:excluded citations. The citations in question according to the the article body are notes made by network members after the fact. So (1)I don't disagree that the opposite opinion could help establish notability.(2)As presented in the article body I do not currently see the
1380:
Kraus, Cynthia (2016), "What is the feminist critique of neuroscience? A call for dissensus studies (notes to page 100)", in de Vos, Jan; Pluth, Ed, eds. (2016). Neuroscience and critique: exploring the limits of the neurological turn. London New York: Routledge. p. 113. ISBN 9781138887350.
1976:
commentary as being reciprocal. Citing responses of the critiqued scientists may help.(3)If there is a response, that is adequate to establish notability of the network member, but unless the respondent specifically mentions the "network", then notability isn't transitive viz.
1771:
I concede that this organization, does exists, but has not been covered in any significant depth or had any demonstrable effects on culture, society, entertainment, athletics, economies, history, literature, science, or education, hence to reiterate, I propose
1520:
A term expressing the idea that disagreement and social conflict are necessary parts of the discovery process: Fitzgerald, Des (2016-08-01). "Book review: Neuroscience and
Critique: Exploring the Limits of the Neurological Turn". History of the Human Sciences.
805:
have a place on the encyclopedia, but right now the relevance of this group to any particular topic is difficult to establish. Instead of deletion, perhaps it should be moved into draft space until the requisite articles on the topics in question have been
1128:âSignificant coverage" addresses the topic directly and in detail, so that no original research is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention, but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material.
827:
criterion 6 ("Non-encyclopedic cross-categorizations") or 7 ("Simple listings without context information") apply at all. The entities being listed â conferences, people and references â all have an evident context. The article is not a case study
486:
Four international conferences, held every four years - Sweden (2010); Vienna (2012); Switzerland (2014); and the US (2016). Are you now arguing that this article should go because it is not notable, that would contradict your opening post?
759:
When participating, please consider the following: Nomination already implies that the nominator recommends deletion (unless indicated otherwise), and nominators should refrain from repeating this recommendation on a separate bulleted
1922:
In fairness, journal articles by members of the network are "primary" sources, albeit vetted by a review process â but we don't rely on those to establish notability, only to indicate what the network members themselves have said.
1645:
Statement about origin:âIn March 2010, the Center for Gender
Research at Uppsala University, and Isabelle Dussauge and Anelis Kaiser in particular, launched the first international and transdisciplinary NeuroGenderings conferenceâ
1744:
When evaluating the notability of organizations or products, please consider whether they have had any significant or demonstrable effects on culture, society, entertainment, athletics, economies, history, literature, science, or
2094:
is to the program of the 2014 conference, an event well past. There's no product to buy. All that link does is provide some extra information about an organization already demonstrated notable by secondary sources. It seems that
238:
not define them or provide links to corresponding wikipedia articles which do define them. This suggests the theories are fringe and do not meet
Knowledge's general criteria for inclusion of academic,organizations and topics.
206:
1138:âIndependent of the subject" excludes works produced by the article's subject or someone affiliated with it. For example, advertising, press releases, autobiographies, and the subject's website are not considered independent
1817:
many respectable ones, this group clears the GNG with room to spare. As I said at the beginning, I originally expected there to be much less material available. My first inclination would have been to recommend a merge per
1950:
original materials that are close to an event, and are often accounts written by people who are directly involved. They offer an insider's view of an event, a period of history, a work of art, a political decision, and so
1734:
Examples: If a notable person buys a restaurant, the restaurant does not "inherit" notability from its owner. If a notable person joins an organization, the organization does not "inherit" notability from its member.
1368:
Vidal, Catherine (December 2012). "The sexed brain: between science and ideology". Neuroethics, special issue: Neuroscience and Sex/Gender. Springer. 5 (3): 295&ndash, 303. doi:10.1007/s12152-011-9121-9.
1906:
Self-published or questionable sources may be used as sources of information about themselves, especially in articles about themselves, without the requirement that they be published experts in the field.
2124:
1932:
1739:
A company, corporation, organization, group, product, or service is notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject.
1029:
1498:
Conrads, Judith. "NeuroCultures â NeuroGenderings II. Konferenz vom 13. bis 15. September 2012 an der
UniversitĂ€t Wien". Gender: Zeitschrift fĂŒr Geschlect, Kultur und Gesellschaft. 5 (1): 138â143.
508:
Again I ask: Does the existence of a conference when its impact cannot be determined to be notable make it encyclopedic? There are many academic conferences held all the time that are suspect see
1834:
845:
547:
456:
1868:
559:
Even though you've been an editor since 2012, the first 5 years you've averaged roughly a dozen edits a year and about 1,000 edits in total, so I'm going to talk to you as if you're a newbie.
404:
424:
864:
I withdraw my earlier statement about the possible merit of the article
Neurosexism it appears that article previously existed twice but has yet to produce something sufficiently coherent.
647:
1532:""NeuroGenderings III â The 1st international Dissensus Conference on brain and gender," Lausanne, 8-10 May 2014". genrepsy.hypotheses.org. Genre et psychiatrie. Retrieved 23 August2017.
1155:
is a small specialized group of math academics and computer scientists, which is analogous to this group. However unlike this group we can answer the questions above. They invented the
1162:
Conversely this article for this Afd refers to a group which researches things which indeed may have some value but for which the value or notability is not presently established herein.
200:
159:
336:, it does not warrant its own article, it does not have its own article, it's a redirect with no other links - just in case anyone specifically looks up "Neurofeminism".
2039:
1181:
For the purposes of this evaluation the citations in the section
History will mostly be considered, as the section debates is inadequate to establish notability viz.:
1557:"NeuroGenderings III Conference Recap" (PDF). International Neuroethics Society Newsletter. International Neuroethics Society. September 2014. Retrieved 2018-10-27.
2060:- Sweden (2010); Vienna (2012); Switzerland (2014); and the US (2016) - can that be corrected please? We also now have yet another reason for deletion being cited:
1076:- when it has held 4 international conferences and has professors and leading neuroscientists at its core - is quite quite ridiculous. This AfD is a simple case of
132:
127:
1852:
255:
136:
274:
1908:- The source has been used to provide the current list of members, so no "violation" there. I've made a few tweaks to your table to make it more readable. --
119:
2073:
1970:
1093:
859:
820:
The article defines "neurofeminism" and "neurosexism", so it is reasonable that those redirect to it. As for the "one time event", it's happened four times.
663:
481:
106:
1484:
Gupta, Kristina (2 October 2012). "A Dispatch from the NeuroGenderings II Conference". The
Neuroethics Blog. Emory University. Retrieved 26 October 2018.
166:
91:
1395:
Establishes that this conference happened twice, and that some of the members may be of note, but not that the conference in and of itself is of note.
764:
In any case, has your rationale for deletion changed again? Is it now on the grounds of primary sources? If so then out of 22 refs there is only one (
731:
sources may be found. Right now as it stand the article appears to be about a one time event, and the majority of the citations are primary sources.
1749:
The primary criteria have five components that must be evaluated separately and independently to determine if it is met significant coverage in:
1392:
MacLellan, Lila (27 August 2017). "The biggest myth about our brains is that they are "male" or "female"". Quartz. Retrieved 26 October 2018
916:, and were wondering if you might have some input on the encyclopedic merits of informal bodies associated with it. Thank you for your time
447:
There were more references available about the conferences and the organization than I had expected. I'm satisfied that notability is met.
472:
Is the existence of a conference for which the notability of its contents is not well established sufficient to consider it encyclopedic?
221:
1205:: this citation looks legitimate but I have yet to evaluate its contents to see whether it actually establishes the networkâs notability
188:
1615:
By
Victoria Pitts-Taylor (1 citation) Acknowledgement only(Primary): The Neurogenderings Network whos conference I attended in Vienna
1345:
Neurofeminism: issues at the intersection of feminist theory and cognitive science. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 9780230296732.
728:
redirect to this article, which is about a conference or organization,not the topics, so they are not adequate to establish notability
2030:
wishes to improve itself. In summary, the tabulation above, though lengthy, is of no use in evaluating the sourcing of this article.
1707:
1081:
651:
1034:...and it dates back to January 2010 when there was no article for Fine. Fine's blp was created in September 2010, the redirect of
2180:
509:
123:
1414:
NeuroGenderings: Critical Studies of the Sexed Brain". genna.gender.uu.se. Uppsala University, Sweden. Retrieved 23 August 2017
1847:
them. This is the natural consequence of scientists proving their productivity by writing papers. For example, finding sources
635:
605:
585:
86:
79:
17:
2069:
1966:
1913:
1089:
1072:
In which case that is where the AfD should have been taken out. Finally the description of The NeuroGenderings Network as an
1001:
988:
948:
855:
773:
659:
492:
432:
412:
393:
182:
2201:
2184:
2161:
2012:
is irrelevant. Nor is the Wills (2017) reference merely a "trivial" mention; he spends a substantial chunk of it discussing
1988:
1917:
1784:
1171:
1005:
952:
925:
815:
782:
I don't take your meaning, there are many reasons why this article does not belong in an encyclopedia. Most crucially that
777:
740:
709:
689:
533:
496:
436:
416:
397:
285:
266:
247:
61:
1825:, perhaps to one of the articles on the founding members, which is still a viable (but now unnecessary) course of action.
1546:
Pulver, Jonas (5 May 2014). "Le sexe du cerveau ne fait pas consensus". Le Temps (in French). Retrieved 26 October 2018.
1462:
Chaperon, Sylvie (15 May 2018). "Neuroféminisme contre neurosexisme". Libération (in French). Retrieved 26 October 2018.
1012:
The editor who was not pinged correctly in the list above was the one who suggested an alternative to deletion â making
178:
1880:- where have you been called names? Anyway the sources that you are labelling "primary" in your table do not come from
1403:
Engh FÞrde, Kristin (30 April 2010). "Tverrfaglig forstÄelse". Forskning.no (in Norwegian). Retrieved 26 October 2018.
2176:
2021:
1332:
Fine, Cordelia,Delusions of gender: how our minds, society, and neurosexism create difference. New York: W.W. Norton.
931:
909:
297:
115:
100:
96:
67:
1217:: This citation is a by someone affiliated with the topic and is therefore invalid for establishing notability under
2135:
1939:
This citation is a by someone affiliated with the topic and is therefore invalid for establishing notability under
1243:
627:
512:. If the topics in question had more peer review I would consider it notable, but as the primary discussed topics
228:
538:
Notability of the organization is established by reliable secondary sources providing coverage of its activities.
2218:
2065:
1962:
1909:
1654:(Trivial Mention, points to user generated content) NeuroGenderings Network (n.d.). The NeuroGenderings Network.
1085:
1077:
997:
984:
944:
851:
769:
655:
503:
488:
428:
408:
389:
40:
1193:
Female brain/ male brain âTracy Shores[ non network member⊠by comparison network member <primary source: -->
1473:"Welcome to NeuroCultures - NeuroGenderings II". univie.ac.at. University of Vienna. Retrieved 23 August 2017.
362:
1509:
Dachs, Augusta (2012-09-12). "Lesen aus der Gehirnstruktur". Der Standard (in German). Retrieved 2018-10-27.
850:
And now we have 4 new basis to try and delete the article - none of them relevant or mentioned in the OP. --
619:
373:
2104:
2090:
conference could be promotional â a way of drumming up business, bringing in more registration fees â but
1773:
824:
791:
783:
2020:
of academic conference proceedings get less attention than that. In addition, the table above criticizes
1623:
By Isabelle Dussauge Acknowledgement Only(Primary,COI):âmy colleagues from the neuroGenderings networkâ
194:
2214:
2120:
2079:
2035:
1984:
1928:
1864:
1830:
1780:
1703:
1536:
1167:
1025:
921:
841:
811:
736:
705:
543:
529:
477:
452:
243:
36:
1447:
Wills, Ben (2017-03-14). "What is Feminist Neuroethics About?". The Neuroethics Blog. Emory University
1061:
865:
1425:
The body/Embodiment group". genna.gender.uu.se. Uppsala University, Sweden. Retrieved 23 August 2017.
1082:
WP:Village pump (idea lab)#Degradation of Sociology Related Pages - Recommend Mass Protection Upgrades
652:
WP:Village pump (idea lab)#Degradation of Sociology Related Pages - Recommend Mass Protection Upgrades
2108:
2100:
2061:
1977:
1897:
1889:
1720:
1695:
1663:
1599:
1524:
Mentions a Chapter of the book reviewed as having being written by Cynthia Kraus. (1)Trival coverage
973:
899:
829:
787:
750:
611:
296:
As the creator of the article I'm not quite sure what the issue is here. The OP has opened an AfD on
1568:"2016 Seed Grants". Center for Science and Society. Columbia University. Retrieved 26 October 2018.
1571:
I can't actually establish why this was cited at all, maybe the page used to say something of not.
1040:
879:
358:
311:
214:
2026:
1631:
By Deboleena Roy Acknowledgement Only(Primary,COI):âTo my friends in the Neurogenderings networkâ
2005:
1822:
1727:
1723:
369:
346:
1767:
Note that an individual source must meet all of these criteria to be counted towards notability.
912:
which this now seems to redirect to. We noted your participation in the deletion discussion of
696:
On google scholar there are only a total of 81, mostly primary sources dealing with the keyword
1417:
Essentially a newsletter by the hosting University noting that the conference will take place.
1961:
in and of itself. The notable academic voices which contradict network members also matter. --
1945:
883:
600:"The NeuroGenderings Network". As such your OP should spell out what your objection(s) are to
278:
259:
75:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
2213:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
1859:
SIAM. This group is smaller and newer, but one should expect the same dynamic to be at work.
1602:, self published user generated content does not meet Knowledgeâs standard of verifiability.
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
2116:
2031:
1980:
1924:
1860:
1855:
was a bit of a nightmare, because it required sifting through the vast amount of literature
1826:
1776:
1699:
1163:
1156:
1056:
1021:
917:
895:
837:
807:
732:
701:
554:
539:
525:
473:
467:
448:
350:
239:
57:
2115:
among the guidelines thrown against the wall here in the hope that one of them will stick.
904:
Hello editors, sorry to bother you, but needed some input on the notability of the article
2197:
2001:
1818:
1640:
Neurofeminism and feminist neurosciences: a critical review of contemporary brain research
1051:
Fascinating as all of that may be, the statement to the editors who were pinged requests,
684:
333:
Neurofeminism and feminist neurosciences: a critical review of contemporary brain research
1644:
By Sigrid Schmitz and Grit Höppner <Schmitz is netowrk member <primary source: -->
2152:
2112:
2096:
2083:
887:
836:); I re-wrote the introduction based on newspaper coverage of it to make sure of this.
833:
794:
327:
2172:
2009:
1940:
1901:
1885:
1800:
1659:
1595:
1488:
1451:
1218:
1122:
1017:
891:
798:
719:
639:
513:
354:
323:
1812:
1806:
1152:
871:
768:) from neurogenderings.wordpress.com (the primary source) in the entire article. --
765:
631:
584:"The NeuroGenderings Network" then you ought to have followed the instructions for
381:
342:
153:
2000:
The citations to the Neuroethics Blog are miscategorized in the table above. See
1080:, the OP has declared his intention to get rid of anything he doesn't like here:
1317:
1244:
https://derstandard.at/2000031791790/Genderforschung-Das-Soziale-an-der-Biologie
1013:
913:
905:
875:
802:
723:
623:
615:
517:
307:
53:
2193:
1189:
Gender differences: Non network member Network member <primary Source: -->
2192:. I think the detailed discussion above clearly points towards notability. /
1185:
Sex differencesâŠ:âNon network members Cordelia fine <primary Source: -->
586:
WP:Articles for deletion#How to nominate multiple related pages for deletion
2025:
because it would benefit the article's coverage of its subject. As for why
2016:
to wit, the journal special issue devoted to their conference proceedings.
1102:
inclusion. This section may change over time as I complete my evaluaiton.
331:
1211:: This source looks like it could be primary and is pending investigation.
1794:
1655:
1591:
610:
The main four guidelines and policies that inform deletion discussions:
1549:
Establishes both that the conference occured and some of its contents.
2091:
981:
I have therefore put in a request to administrators to close this AfD.
1476:
Simple archive page mentioning that the conference hapened in Vienna
1428:
No mention of the "network" not relevant to establishing notability.
571:
If you have an issue with the redirect page "Neurofeminism" click on
866:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Neurosexism
577:
and add your comments to the talk page there or create an AfD there.
568:
and add your comments to the talk page there or create an AfD there.
1843:
scientific societies and suchlike groups to get swamped by sources
562:
If you have an issue with the redirect page "Neurosexism" click on
1070:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Neurosexism&redirect=no
1839:
As an addendum, I should note that it's not unusual for coverage
1302:
596:
AfD that you have begun is for "The NeuroGenderings Network" and
341:
The OP previously added the following templates to this article:
2082:". A conference program is not an advertisement in the sense of
2209:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
2138:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
1884:(the only primary source in the article). You have mentioned
868:. Perhaps the editors on that article might have some input.
1627:
Molecular Feminisms: Biology, Becomings, and Life in the Lab
1606:
Books (All 3 are not independent or particularly in depth))
376:- there were no corresponding talk messages to any of them
1262:
Geschlechterunterschiede: Das Spiel der Hormone im Hirn".
2175:. Covered in multiple reliable sources, including books.
1719:
So on the grounds of notability of organizations, citing
832:#9). Nor does it read as a promotion or a press release (
648:
Knowledge:NPOV means neutral editors, not neutral content
405:
list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions
425:
list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions
1650:
GJSS Graduate Journal of Social Science Vol 14, Issue 2
1512:(1)Trivial, primarily talks about the ideas of Schmitz
1069:
1053:
some input on the notability of the article Neurosexism
1045:
1038:
was created as a link to an article about Fine's book,
1035:
940:
573:
564:
385:
377:
317:
149:
145:
141:
1465:
Existence but not notability similar to citation (1).
1266:
Same publisher as above, also interviewing Schmitz (1)
683:. There are several academic sources discussing this.
213:
1611:
The Brain's Body: Neuroscience and Corporeal Politics
1252:
of netowrk establishes extance, but not why notable
2149:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
1894:
does not meet Knowledgeâs standard of verifiability
580:If you want to take an AfD on both redirect pages
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
2221:). No further edits should be made to this page.
646:You might also benefit from reading the essay -
423:Note: This discussion has been included in the
403:Note: This discussion has been included in the
273:Note: This discussion has been included in the
254:Note: This discussion has been included in the
312:the "contents" section of Cordelia Fine's book
300:but has then argued a case against 2 redirects.
1853:Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics
1581:Evaluation of Sources using wikipedia tool-lab
2086:. In principle, linking to the website of an
1318:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK333549/
227:
8:
1055:. Why? There is no article for Neurosexism.
256:list of Science-related deletion discussions
107:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
2014:an activity of the NeuroGenderings Network,
1878:but youâve started to call me name so be it
908:and it's associate body of researchers the
275:list of Sweden-related deletion discussions
1693:
650:which probably explains why your proposal
606:Before nominating: checks and alternatives
422:
402:
272:
253:
2056:conference" keeps being used to describe
1059:knows this - he has posted a link to the
380:. Oh yeah, I nearly forgot, there was an
1224:
320:, I think this is a better place for it.
2058:four seperate international conferences
326:is indeed a neologism based a paper by
1949:
1938:
1905:
1893:
1877:
1743:
1738:
1732:
1656:https://neurogenderings.wordpress.com/
1592:https://neurogenderings.wordpress.com/
1177:Evaluation of Sources Cited in article
1073:
1052:
758:
609:
1535:This is a program for the conference
1106:Evaluation of sources by Ethanpet113
522:seem to only redirect to this article
7:
1658:. As only citation which violates
1619:Sex, cash and neuromodels of desire
1289:Dussauge, Isabelle; Anelis, Anelis
1198:Evaluation citations 1-27: Legend
24:
1110:collapsed by The Vintage Feminist
310:already existed as a redirect to
510:Predatory open-access publishing
92:Introduction to deletion process
1278:Schmitz, Sigrid; Höppner, Grit
991:) 14:29, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
2146:Needs opinions by more people.
2078:Also, reference 24 is called "
1303:https://doi.org/10.1086/684266
1062:successful deletion discussion
994:Struck through my own comment.
1:
1882:neurogenderings.wordpress.com
62:14:08, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
2202:22:54, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
2185:09:30, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
2162:12:53, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
2125:18:48, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
2074:15:10, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
2040:14:14, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
1989:12:05, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
1971:20:59, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
1933:20:07, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
1918:17:37, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
1869:14:28, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
1835:13:03, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
1785:11:25, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
1172:06:19, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
1094:12:44, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
1067:an AfD for the redirect page
1065:. What he is arguing now is
1030:15:47, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
1006:11:51, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
953:14:52, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
926:12:17, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
860:00:25, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
846:10:16, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
816:01:22, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
778:00:39, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
741:22:40, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
710:22:52, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
690:17:56, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
664:01:23, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
548:12:11, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
534:01:09, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
497:00:28, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
482:22:52, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
457:17:14, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
437:15:07, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
417:15:07, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
398:14:43, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
286:10:59, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
267:10:59, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
248:09:17, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
2027:the "2016 seed grants" page
1959:neurofeminism / neurosexism
1406:(1)Trival plug by primary.
1316:Callard, F.; Fitzgerald, D
1248:Interview with Schmitz, (1)
932:The NeuroGenderings Network
910:The NeuroGenderings Network
797:. It may be possible that
298:The NeuroGenderings Network
116:The NeuroGenderings Network
82:(AfD)? Read these primers!
68:The NeuroGenderings Network
2238:
1937:OP has defined primary as
1900:(which is an exception to
1143:Example of a Notable Group
1120:
1247:
1241:
2211:Please do not modify it.
2048:I don't understand why "
1238:
32:Please do not modify it.
1948:sources are defined as
2177:AlessandroTiandelli333
1892:as "violations" as it
1774:Knowledge:Userfication
1436:Dussauge, Isabelle...
1117:Criteria for inclusion
524:, I find this dubious.
1454:+ (1)Trivial mention
1121:Further information:
636:what Knowledge is not
80:Articles for deletion
2066:The Vintage Feminist
1963:The Vintage Feminist
1910:The Vintage Feminist
1849:about the history of
1086:The Vintage Feminist
998:The Vintage Feminist
985:The Vintage Feminist
945:The Vintage Feminist
852:The Vintage Feminist
770:The Vintage Feminist
656:The Vintage Feminist
504:The Vintage Feminist
489:The Vintage Feminist
429:The Vintage Feminist
409:The Vintage Feminist
390:The Vintage Feminist
1674:Newspaper 0 results
1041:Delusions of Gender
1016:into a redirect to
766:the list of members
654:wasn't taken up. --
314:Delusions of Gender
2144:Relisting comment:
1762:secondary sources.
1680:HighBeam 0 results
1594:. Which violates
1078:WP:IJUSTDONTLIKEIT
971:Serious breach of
939:the redirect page
2164:
2160:
2052:conference" and "
1953:The topic is the
1711:
1698:comment added by
1635:Scholar(Articles)
1575:
1574:
1357:Dussage repeated
1260:Krichmayr, Karin
1250:trivial mentioned
1112:
1044:in February 2017
1008:
823:I do not see how
755:How to contribute
688:
439:
419:
368:
330:and Grit Höppner
288:
269:
97:Guide to deletion
87:How to contribute
2229:
2159:
2157:
2150:
2148:
2141:
2139:
1792:The coverage in
1225:
1157:RSA Cryptosystem
1151:For example the
1108:
992:
979:
976:
930:This AfD is for
903:
687:
628:reliable sources
558:
507:
471:
366:
283:
264:
232:
231:
217:
169:
157:
139:
77:
34:
2237:
2236:
2232:
2231:
2230:
2228:
2227:
2226:
2225:
2219:deletion review
2165:
2153:
2151:
2134:
2132:
2105:WP:NOTDIRECTORY
2022:Caselles (2018)
1789:
1788:
1717:
1683:JSTOR 0 results
1671:
1637:
1608:
1588:
1583:
1450:Blog, violates
1323:trivial mention
1300:Roy, Deboleena
1268:trivial mention
1179:
1145:
1125:
1119:
1113:
974:
970:
869:
825:WP:NOTDIRECTORY
792:WP:PRESSRELEASE
784:WP:NOTDIRECTORY
749:Please observe
698:neurogenderings
552:
501:
465:
363:Primary sources
279:
260:
174:
165:
130:
114:
111:
74:
71:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2235:
2233:
2224:
2223:
2205:
2204:
2187:
2147:
2142:
2131:
2130:
2129:
2128:
2127:
2084:that guideline
1998:
1997:
1996:
1995:
1994:
1993:
1992:
1991:
1874:
1873:
1872:
1871:
1764:
1763:
1760:
1757:
1754:
1716:
1713:
1691:
1690:
1687:
1684:
1681:
1678:
1677:FENS 0 results
1675:
1670:
1667:
1652:
1651:
1642:
1641:
1636:
1633:
1629:
1628:
1621:
1620:
1613:
1612:
1607:
1604:
1587:
1584:
1582:
1579:
1577:
1573:
1572:
1569:
1566:
1562:
1561:
1558:
1555:
1551:
1550:
1547:
1544:
1540:
1539:
1537:WP:Promotional
1533:
1530:
1526:
1525:
1522:
1518:
1514:
1513:
1510:
1507:
1503:
1502:
1499:
1496:
1492:
1491:
1485:
1482:
1478:
1477:
1474:
1471:
1467:
1466:
1463:
1460:
1456:
1455:
1448:
1445:
1441:
1440:
1437:
1434:
1430:
1429:
1426:
1423:
1419:
1418:
1415:
1412:
1408:
1407:
1404:
1401:
1397:
1396:
1393:
1390:
1386:
1385:
1382:
1378:
1374:
1373:
1370:
1366:
1362:
1361:
1358:
1355:
1351:
1350:
1347:
1341:
1337:
1336:
1333:
1330:
1326:
1325:
1320:
1314:
1310:
1309:
1306:
1298:
1294:
1293:
1290:
1287:
1283:
1282:
1279:
1276:
1272:
1271:
1264:
1258:
1254:
1253:
1246:
1240:
1236:
1235:
1232:
1229:
1223:
1222:
1212:
1206:
1196:
1195:
1191:
1187:
1178:
1175:
1144:
1141:
1140:
1139:
1135:
1134:
1130:
1129:
1118:
1115:
1114:
1107:
1105:
1104:
1099:
1098:
1097:
1096:
1049:
968:
967:
966:
965:
964:
963:
962:
961:
960:
959:
958:
957:
956:
955:
880:DennisTheTiger
821:
762:
744:
743:
713:
712:
693:
692:
677:
676:
675:
674:
673:
672:
671:
670:
669:
668:
667:
666:
644:
604:article. From
592:As it stands,
590:
589:
588:
578:
569:
460:
459:
441:
440:
420:
400:
374:Self-published
339:
338:
337:
328:Sigrid Schmitz
321:
302:
301:
290:
289:
270:
235:
234:
171:
110:
109:
104:
94:
89:
72:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2234:
2222:
2220:
2216:
2212:
2207:
2206:
2203:
2199:
2195:
2191:
2188:
2186:
2182:
2178:
2174:
2170:
2167:
2166:
2163:
2158:
2156:
2145:
2140:
2137:
2126:
2122:
2118:
2114:
2110:
2109:WP:NOTJOURNAL
2106:
2102:
2101:WP:INHERITORG
2098:
2093:
2089:
2085:
2081:
2077:
2076:
2075:
2071:
2067:
2063:
2062:WP:INHERITORG
2059:
2055:
2051:
2047:
2044:
2043:
2042:
2041:
2037:
2033:
2028:
2023:
2019:
2015:
2011:
2007:
2003:
1990:
1986:
1982:
1979:
1978:WP:INHERITORG
1974:
1973:
1972:
1968:
1964:
1960:
1956:
1952:
1947:
1944:
1942:
1936:
1935:
1934:
1930:
1926:
1921:
1920:
1919:
1915:
1911:
1907:
1903:
1899:
1898:WP:SELFSOURCE
1895:
1891:
1890:WP:SELFSOURCE
1887:
1883:
1879:
1876:
1875:
1870:
1866:
1862:
1858:
1854:
1850:
1846:
1842:
1838:
1837:
1836:
1832:
1828:
1824:
1820:
1815:
1814:
1809:
1808:
1804:
1802:
1798:
1796:
1791:
1790:
1787:
1786:
1782:
1778:
1775:
1769:
1768:
1761:
1758:
1755:
1752:
1751:
1750:
1747:
1746:
1741:
1740:
1736:
1735:
1730:
1729:
1725:
1722:
1721:WP:INHERITORG
1714:
1712:
1709:
1705:
1701:
1697:
1689:NYT 0 results
1688:
1686:TWL 0 results
1685:
1682:
1679:
1676:
1673:
1672:
1668:
1666:
1665:
1664:WP:SELFSOURCE
1661:
1657:
1649:
1648:
1647:
1639:
1638:
1634:
1632:
1626:
1625:
1624:
1618:
1617:
1616:
1610:
1609:
1605:
1603:
1601:
1600:WP:SELFSOURCE
1597:
1593:
1585:
1580:
1578:
1570:
1567:
1564:
1563:
1559:
1556:
1553:
1552:
1548:
1545:
1542:
1541:
1538:
1534:
1531:
1528:
1527:
1523:
1519:
1516:
1515:
1511:
1508:
1505:
1504:
1500:
1497:
1494:
1493:
1490:
1486:
1483:
1480:
1479:
1475:
1472:
1469:
1468:
1464:
1461:
1458:
1457:
1453:
1449:
1446:
1443:
1442:
1438:
1435:
1432:
1431:
1427:
1424:
1421:
1420:
1416:
1413:
1410:
1409:
1405:
1402:
1399:
1398:
1394:
1391:
1388:
1387:
1383:
1379:
1376:
1375:
1371:
1367:
1364:
1363:
1359:
1356:
1353:
1352:
1348:
1346:
1343:Bluhm, Robyn
1342:
1339:
1338:
1334:
1331:
1328:
1327:
1324:
1321:
1319:
1315:
1312:
1311:
1307:
1305:
1304:
1299:
1296:
1295:
1291:
1288:
1285:
1284:
1280:
1277:
1274:
1273:
1269:
1265:
1263:
1259:
1256:
1255:
1251:
1245:
1242:1.Briet Lisa
1237:
1233:
1230:
1227:
1226:
1220:
1216:
1213:
1210:
1207:
1204:
1201:
1200:
1199:
1192:
1188:
1184:
1183:
1182:
1176:
1174:
1173:
1169:
1165:
1160:
1158:
1154:
1149:
1142:
1137:
1136:
1132:
1131:
1127:
1126:
1124:
1116:
1111:
1103:
1095:
1091:
1087:
1083:
1079:
1075:
1074:informal body
1071:
1068:
1064:
1063:
1058:
1054:
1050:
1047:
1043:
1042:
1037:
1033:
1032:
1031:
1027:
1023:
1019:
1018:Cordelia Fine
1015:
1011:
1010:
1009:
1007:
1003:
999:
995:
990:
986:
982:
978:
977:
975:WP:CANVASSING
954:
950:
946:
942:
938:
937:
933:
929:
928:
927:
923:
919:
915:
911:
907:
901:
897:
893:
889:
885:
881:
877:
873:
867:
863:
862:
861:
857:
853:
849:
848:
847:
843:
839:
835:
831:
830:WP:NOTJOURNAL
826:
822:
819:
818:
817:
813:
809:
804:
800:
799:Neurofeminism
796:
793:
789:
788:WP:NOTJOURNAL
785:
781:
780:
779:
775:
771:
767:
763:
761:
756:
752:
751:WP:DISCUSSAFD
748:
747:
746:
745:
742:
738:
734:
729:
725:
721:
720:Neurofeminism
718:
715:
714:
711:
707:
703:
699:
695:
694:
691:
686:
682:
679:
678:
665:
661:
657:
653:
649:
645:
643:
641:
637:
633:
629:
625:
621:
620:verifiability
617:
613:
607:
603:
599:
595:
591:
587:
583:
579:
576:
575:
570:
567:
566:
561:
560:
556:
551:
550:
549:
545:
541:
537:
536:
535:
531:
527:
523:
519:
515:
514:Neurofeminism
511:
505:
500:
499:
498:
494:
490:
485:
484:
483:
479:
475:
469:
464:
463:
462:
461:
458:
454:
450:
446:
443:
442:
438:
434:
430:
426:
421:
418:
414:
410:
406:
401:
399:
395:
391:
388:) as well! --
387:
383:
379:
375:
371:
364:
360:
356:
352:
348:
344:
340:
335:
334:
329:
325:
324:Neurofeminism
322:
319:
316:
315:
309:
306:
305:
304:
303:
299:
295:
292:
291:
287:
284:
282:
276:
271:
268:
265:
263:
257:
252:
251:
250:
249:
245:
241:
230:
226:
223:
220:
216:
212:
208:
205:
202:
199:
196:
193:
190:
187:
184:
180:
177:
176:Find sources:
172:
168:
164:
161:
155:
151:
147:
143:
138:
134:
129:
125:
121:
117:
113:
112:
108:
105:
102:
98:
95:
93:
90:
88:
85:
84:
83:
81:
76:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
2210:
2208:
2189:
2168:
2154:
2143:
2133:
2087:
2057:
2053:
2049:
2045:
2017:
2013:
1999:
1958:
1957:rather than
1954:
1896:. Actually,
1881:
1857:published by
1856:
1848:
1844:
1840:
1813:Forskning.no
1811:
1807:Der Standard
1805:
1799:
1793:
1770:
1766:
1765:
1748:
1742:
1737:
1731:
1718:
1694:â Preceding
1692:
1653:
1643:
1630:
1622:
1614:
1590:Only result
1589:
1576:
1487:Primary and
1344:
1322:
1301:
1267:
1261:
1249:
1214:
1208:
1202:
1197:
1180:
1161:
1153:RSA Security
1150:
1146:
1109:
1100:
1066:
1060:
1039:
993:
980:
972:
969:
935:
934:
884:Anna Lincoln
754:
727:
716:
697:
680:
601:
597:
593:
581:
572:
563:
521:
444:
332:
313:
293:
281:CAPTAIN RAJU
280:
262:CAPTAIN RAJU
261:
236:
224:
218:
210:
203:
197:
191:
185:
175:
162:
73:
49:
47:
31:
28:
2080:promotional
2006:WP:NEWSBLOG
1981:Ethanpet113
1823:WP:PRESERVE
1777:Ethanpet113
1756:independent
1728:WP:ORGDEPTH
1724:WP:ORGCRITE
1700:Ethanpet113
1270:of network
1164:Ethanpet113
1057:Ethanpet113
1036:Neurosexism
1014:Neurosexism
941:Neurosexism
918:Ethanpet113
914:Neurosexism
906:Neurosexism
896:Glenfarclas
808:Ethanpet113
803:Neurosexism
733:Ethanpet113
724:Neurosexism
702:Ethanpet113
555:Ethanpet113
526:Ethanpet113
518:Neurosexism
474:Ethanpet113
308:Neurosexism
240:Ethanpet113
201:free images
2155:Sandstein
2117:XOR'easter
2032:XOR'easter
1946:WP:PRIMARY
1925:XOR'easter
1904:) states,
1861:XOR'easter
1827:XOR'easter
1801:Libération
1745:education.
1715:Conclusion
1586:Sites/News
1022:XOR'easter
900:PburkaSL93
838:XOR'easter
612:notability
540:XOR'easter
468:XOR'easter
449:XOR'easter
367:keep going
359:Notability
2215:talk page
2092:that link
1234:Validity
888:JBsupreme
574:this link
565:this link
370:Recentism
347:Confusing
37:talk page
2217:or in a
2136:Relisted
2088:upcoming
2002:WP:BLOGS
1819:WP:ATD-M
1795:Le Temps
1759:reliable
1753:multiple
1708:contribs
1696:unsigned
1560:Primary
1439:Primary
1384:Primary
1372:Primary
1360:Primary
1349:Primary
1335:Primary
1308:Primary
1292:Primary
1281:Primary
892:Armbrust
806:created.
160:View log
101:glossary
39:or in a
2171:Passes
2113:WP:SOAP
2097:WP:SPAM
2046:Comment
1955:network
1231:Source
1215:Primary
898:, and
872:Tyrenon
834:WP:SOAP
795:WP:SOAP
790:#9 and
717:Comment
685:SarahSV
634:), and
351:Context
207:WPÂ refs
195:scholar
133:protect
128:history
78:New to
2173:WP:GNG
2099:joins
2018:Plenty
2010:WP:UGC
1941:WP:GNG
1902:WP:UGC
1886:WP:UGC
1660:WP:UGC
1596:WP:UGC
1501:Maybe
1489:WP:UGC
1452:WP:UGC
1219:WP:GNG
1123:WP:GNG
876:Frmatt
640:WP:NOT
384:PROD (
179:Google
137:delete
54:Michig
2194:Julle
1841:about
1669:Other
1209:Maybe
786:#6,7
760:line.
632:WP:RS
382:WP:A7
222:JSTOR
183:books
167:Stats
154:views
146:watch
142:links
16:<
2198:talk
2190:Keep
2181:talk
2169:Keep
2121:talk
2111:and
2070:talk
2064:. --
2036:talk
2004:and
1985:talk
1967:talk
1929:talk
1914:talk
1865:talk
1851:the
1831:talk
1821:and
1810:and
1781:talk
1704:talk
1565:27.
1554:26.
1543:25.
1529:24.
1517:23.
1506:22.
1495:21.
1481:20.
1470:19.
1459:18.
1444:17.
1433:16.
1422:15.
1411:14.
1400:13.
1389:12.
1377:11.
1365:10.
1168:talk
1090:talk
1084:. --
1046:diff
1026:talk
1002:talk
989:talk
949:talk
943:. --
922:talk
856:talk
842:talk
812:talk
801:and
774:talk
737:talk
722:and
706:talk
681:Keep
660:talk
624:WP:V
616:WP:N
602:that
598:only
594:this
544:talk
530:talk
516:and
493:talk
478:talk
453:talk
445:Keep
433:talk
413:talk
394:talk
386:diff
378:diff
372:and
355:Hoax
318:diff
294:Keep
244:talk
215:FENS
189:news
150:logs
124:talk
120:edit
58:talk
50:keep
2050:the
1951:on.
1354:9.
1340:8.
1329:7.
1313:6.
1297:5.
1286:4.
1275:3.
1257:2.
1239:1.
936:not
626:),
618:),
582:and
520:,
343:COI
229:TWL
158:â (
2200:)
2183:)
2123:)
2107:,
2103:,
2072:)
2038:)
2008:;
1987:)
1969:)
1931:)
1916:)
1888:,
1867:)
1845:by
1833:)
1783:)
1710:)
1706:âą
1662:,
1598:,
1228:#
1203:Ok
1170:)
1092:)
1028:)
1020:.
1004:)
996:--
983:--
951:)
924:)
894:,
890:,
886:,
882:,
878:,
874:,
858:)
844:)
814:)
776:)
757:"
739:)
726:,
708:)
662:)
608::
546:)
532:)
495:)
487:--
480:)
455:)
435:)
427:.
415:)
407:.
396:)
365:,
361:,
357:,
353:,
349:,
345:,
277:.
258:.
246:)
209:)
152:|
148:|
144:|
140:|
135:|
131:|
126:|
122:|
60:)
52:.
2196:(
2179:(
2119:(
2068:(
2054:a
2034:(
1983:(
1965:(
1943:.
1927:(
1912:(
1863:(
1829:(
1803:,
1797:,
1779:(
1726:,
1702:(
1221:.
1194:â
1190:â
1186:â
1166:(
1088:(
1048:.
1024:(
1000:(
987:(
947:(
920:(
902::
870:@
854:(
840:(
828:(
810:(
772:(
753:"
735:(
704:(
658:(
642:)
638:(
630:(
622:(
614:(
557::
553:@
542:(
528:(
506::
502:@
491:(
476:(
470::
466:@
451:(
431:(
411:(
392:(
242:(
233:)
225:·
219:·
211:·
204:·
198:·
192:·
186:·
181:(
173:(
170:)
163:·
156:)
118:(
103:)
99:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.