492:
Or add some content. Perhaps someone could create an article about this topic which is more than the less-than -stub this is. Some of the articles it links to deal with rights rather than violence. No "Male Foot
Binding" no "Husband Burning" to compare to "Female Foot Binding" and "Bride Burning."
569:
will be put up for deletion as being a similar dictionary definition/linkfarm. Discussion of this deletion proposal has nothing to do with the legitimacy of discussing violence against men and everything to do with whether the article a) violates
87:
508:'s mother abused him, in part, because she'd wanted a girl. Male on male violence is the main kind of violence reported, at least in the developed world, but that's more crime or gang activity.--
99:, all of which suggest that there is a cohesive idea. "Violence against men," as a topic name for a cohesive idea, has no such evidence for its existence; given the articles on which links to
213:
as well. A term of art it may be, but in both cases the article amounts to no more than an (obvious) dictionary definition of their title term, plus some links. WP is not a link farm.
411:
article made since this AfD opened, (assuming this closes as a delete). It looks as if someone is attempting to merge this article to it. (And making a bit of a mess if I'm any judge.)
123:
Google shows over 100,000 results for "violence against men" (754 "unique" results). There is a potential for abuse (so to speak) with the article, so it might need to be monitored.
82:, with specific denotative and connotative meaning in common use within at least some segments of the world, a fact reflected in everything from legislation like the
261:
Although possibly an article on gender-related violence could be encyclopedic. Neither of these are articles and their titles are vague for encyclopedic purposes.--
120:. Although it may not be a term of art or movement, it is still a concept that's talked about, even if only as a comparison with violence against women.
248:
If this is deleted and a precedent thus established I'll nominate that one for deletion too (not prod as there could be different principles involved).
168:
as of now, it's nothing but a worthless restatement of the title. Possibly a legitimate subject, but this is a delete-and-start-over case.
504:
This might be sexist of me, but I'd wager the vast amount of violence to males by females is violence to boys rather than men. I believe
354:
292:
470:
17:
180:
without prejudice against later re-creation if someone wants to write a proper article about what is certainly a genuine subject.
277:
If this is removed the
Violence against women thread should also be removied, it is prejudice and sexist if it doesnt happen (UTC)
103:
have been added, the manner in which those links were added, and the way in which the article was created, it looks like a
91:
597:
36:
582:
560:
533:
512:
497:
484:
447:
435:
415:
395:
376:
323:
308:
265:
252:
243:
229:
217:
201:
187:
172:
160:
148:
111:
108:
83:
62:
596:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
556:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
350:
288:
466:
393:
306:
140:
458:
342:
280:
566:
544:
408:
388:, copying an article verbatim and replacing a single word is not the way to go about creating material. -
210:
121:
75:
528:
346:
284:
169:
462:
319:, wait for this one to be deleted and precedent established before nominating other similar articles.
78:
with the word "women" in the original changed to "men". Problem is that "violence against women" is a
100:
68:
549:
90:
to people and groups who identify themselves as part of a "movement to end violence against women"
444:
389:
302:
184:
127:
571:
424:
316:
104:
49:
565:
Hey, why not try reading the discussion before taking part? As said above, if this goes then
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
523:
505:
575:
509:
262:
240:
239:
For now. That said if the woman one is put up for delete I'll switch to delete for both.--
226:
54:
432:
412:
373:
428:
481:
372:
comments at the same time isn't just bad wikiettiquette, it's blatently obvious...--
197:
181:
157:
94:
579:
494:
320:
249:
214:
79:
156:
This is a legitimate issue, I'm sure, but this is not a legitimate article.
59:
97:
590:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
107:
violation in the form of a neologism and original research.
547:? It does happen, and it's just as legitimate an issue. --
480:, claims not verified and NPOV doesn't mean equal time.
423:
per nom. This appears to be a pretty clear cut POV/
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
600:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
574:, b) is encyclopedic, c) can be more than a
74:The article was created by a copy-paste of
456:
340:
339:Agree, that it is a Legitimate Issue (UTC)
278:
209:and I'd vote to delete the sister-article
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
58:attempts should be speedy deleted.
522:- dont discriminate against males.
24:
543:- What makes this different from
405:CLOSING ADMIN MIGHT NEED TO CHECK
52:. Article may be recreated, but
583:09:45, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
561:06:22, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
534:02:25, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
513:00:33, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
498:23:35, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
485:23:20, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
448:18:02, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
436:16:08, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
416:12:36, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
396:10:19, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
377:16:11, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
324:12:19, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
309:10:19, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
266:18:42, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
253:12:19, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
244:06:27, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
230:06:09, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
218:06:06, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
202:04:52, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
188:04:31, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
173:04:23, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
161:04:17, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
149:02:30, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
112:02:19, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
63:10:19, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
1:
617:
84:Violence Against Women Act
403:no vote from me, but the
593:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
443:per nom and Isotope23.
567:Violence against women
545:Violence against women
409:Violence against women
211:Violence against women
76:Violence against women
576:dictionary definition
109:The Literate Engineer
301:Then nominate it. -
101:Violence against men
69:Violence against men
407:the changes to the
315:No, don't. As per
455:It has relevancy
427:article and it is
474:
461:comment added by
358:
345:comment added by
296:
283:comment added by
257:Then I switch to
608:
595:
552:
532:
506:Charles Beaumont
200:
170:Opabinia regalis
144:
137:
132:
126:
34:
616:
615:
611:
610:
609:
607:
606:
605:
604:
598:deletion review
591:
550:
531:
526:
196:
147:
142:
133:
128:
124:
72:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
614:
612:
603:
602:
587:
586:
585:
551:AlexWCovington
537:
536:
527:
516:
515:
501:
500:
487:
475:
450:
438:
418:
398:
382:
381:
380:
379:
360:
359:
331:
330:
329:
328:
327:
326:
298:
297:
272:
271:
270:
269:
268:
232:
220:
204:
190:
175:
163:
151:
139:
71:
66:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
613:
601:
599:
594:
588:
584:
581:
577:
573:
568:
564:
563:
562:
558:
554:
553:
546:
542:
539:
538:
535:
530:
525:
521:
518:
517:
514:
511:
507:
503:
502:
499:
496:
491:
488:
486:
483:
479:
476:
472:
468:
464:
460:
454:
451:
449:
446:
445:Fernando Rizo
442:
439:
437:
434:
430:
426:
422:
419:
417:
414:
410:
406:
402:
399:
397:
394:
391:
387:
384:
383:
378:
375:
371:
367:
364:
363:
362:
361:
356:
352:
348:
347:88.108.52.122
344:
338:
337:
333:
332:
325:
322:
318:
314:
313:
312:
311:
310:
307:
304:
300:
299:
294:
290:
286:
285:88.108.52.122
282:
276:
273:
267:
264:
260:
256:
255:
254:
251:
247:
246:
245:
242:
238:
237:
233:
231:
228:
224:
221:
219:
216:
212:
208:
205:
203:
199:
194:
191:
189:
186:
183:
179:
176:
174:
171:
167:
164:
162:
159:
155:
152:
150:
146:
145:
138:
136:
131:
122:
119:
116:
115:
114:
113:
110:
106:
102:
98:
95:
92:
89:
85:
81:
77:
70:
67:
65:
64:
61:
57:
56:
51:
47:
46:Speedy delete
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
592:
589:
548:
540:
519:
489:
477:
463:88.109.249.9
457:— Preceding
452:
440:
420:
404:
400:
385:
369:
365:
341:— Preceding
335:
334:
279:— Preceding
274:
258:
235:
234:
222:
206:
192:
177:
165:
153:
141:
134:
129:
117:
73:
53:
45:
43:
31:
28:
368:adding two
88:book titles
80:term of art
510:T. Anthony
431:to boot.--
263:T. Anthony
241:T. Anthony
195:per nom. —
55:nonserious
433:Isotope23
429:unsourced
413:AndyJones
374:Isotope23
236:Weak Keep
572:WP:POINT
529:Bakatalk
482:Gazpacho
471:contribs
459:unsigned
425:WP:POINT
355:contribs
343:unsigned
317:WP:POINT
293:contribs
281:unsigned
198:Khoikhoi
182:bikeable
135:spinster
105:WP:POINT
50:WP:POINT
524:Bakaman
401:Comment
366:Comment
259:delete.
158:eaolson
580:Vizjim
495:Edison
490:Delete
478:Delete
441:Delete
421:Delete
386:Delete
321:Vizjim
250:Vizjim
223:Delete
215:Vizjim
207:Delete
193:Delete
185:(talk)
178:Delete
166:Delete
154:Delete
130:disco
16:<
557:talk
541:Keep
520:Keep
467:talk
453:Keep
370:keep
351:talk
336:Keep
289:talk
275:Keep
227:Peta
143:talk
118:Keep
60:El_C
390:Mgm
303:Mgm
125:...
86:to
48:as
578:.
559:)
473:)
469:•
357:)
353:•
295:)
291:•
225:--
96:,
93:,
555:(
465:(
392:|
349:(
305:|
287:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.