201:
386:
it looks like a serious work (over 12K commits, 8K stars, and 300 contributors). After deep search (I checked all of the links provided by Google search engine after search using "Zig programming") I could get the next
232:
Not enough coverage in RS to establish notability. The theregister.co.uk and SD News citations are just mentions in passing. Infoworld gave it a page in 2016 but IMO that not enough to satisfy
195:
162:
277:
257:
135:
130:
139:
432:- Written by an author who published many technical articles in different topics through many years. (I know, We can say it's a blog article - Not Reliable)
122:
109:
549:
The above makes me doubt my original conclusion. I am going to wait to see if there are more comments, and then will most likely go with the consensus. --
94:
491:
370:
has not been written by the developer group and is quite recent. Not sure if this counts as significant, though it's certainly not low effort. --
216:
566:, LWN and Infoworld are reliable sources and have significant coverage - plenty of detail and context to be the basis of an article.
183:
494:
321:
126:
89:
82:
17:
575:
558:
537:
508:
474:
374:
352:
327:
289:
269:
249:
64:
177:
285:
103:
99:
173:
118:
70:
592:
40:
223:
402:- (I don't know if this is good for notability or not - Can we use videos as reliable references? I guess Yes)
412:
281:
571:
588:
36:
453:
I expected to find more/better references (After checking it in GitHub) but I can't find many of them.
189:
60:
554:
395:
315:
265:
245:
209:
336:
362:, True, the project is recent and has not received a lot of coverage due to its volatility. Yet
567:
78:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
587:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
533:
470:
340:
305:
429:
525:
442:
382:
Zig is an open-source project (We relax our criteria for these projects). When looking at
371:
237:
53:
550:
504:
348:
332:
309:
261:
241:
487:
301:
233:
335:, please ignore the crappy sources when assessing notability. Did you not find any
156:
529:
466:
517:
500:
462:
344:
413:
https://www.gingerbill.org/article/2019/05/13/a-reply-to-the-road-to-zig/
367:
399:
415:- An article by Ginger Bill - Author of Odin programming language :
497:
363:
383:
396:
https://fosdem.org/2021/schedule/track/zig_programming_language/
583:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
416:
430:
https://itscomputersciencetime.netlify.app/zig-thoughts/
443:
https://sudonull.com/post/3683-Zig-programming-language
152:
148:
144:
208:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
595:). No further edits should be made to this page.
276:Note: This discussion has been included in the
256:Note: This discussion has been included in the
278:list of Computing-related deletion discussions
258:list of Software-related deletion discussions
222:
8:
110:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
275:
255:
398:- Four lectures by different authors in
7:
24:
465:I am interested in your opinion.
364:https://lwn.net/Articles/833400/
95:Introduction to deletion process
486:- Notability established under
419:- (Maybe useful for notability)
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
576:10:01, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
559:18:30, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
538:05:09, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
509:18:18, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
475:10:10, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
375:09:19, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
353:13:46, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
328:20:04, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
290:15:44, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
270:15:08, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
250:15:08, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
65:20:30, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
85:(AfD)? Read these primers!
612:
119:Zig (programming language)
71:Zig (programming language)
585:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
417:https://odin-lang.org/
83:Articles for deletion
520:Thanks, I vote to
282:CommanderWaterford
292:
272:
100:Guide to deletion
90:How to contribute
603:
324:
318:
312:
227:
226:
212:
160:
142:
80:
56:
34:
611:
610:
606:
605:
604:
602:
601:
600:
599:
593:deletion review
372:User:LuckyStarr
322:
316:
310:
169:
133:
117:
114:
77:
74:
54:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
609:
607:
598:
597:
579:
578:
561:
543:
542:
541:
540:
526:this reference
512:
511:
480:
479:
478:
477:
457:
456:
455:
454:
448:
447:
446:
445:
436:
435:
434:
433:
423:
422:
421:
420:
406:
405:
404:
403:
389:
388:
377:
357:
356:
355:
294:
293:
273:
230:
229:
166:
113:
112:
107:
97:
92:
75:
73:
68:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
608:
596:
594:
590:
586:
581:
580:
577:
573:
569:
565:
562:
560:
556:
552:
548:
545:
544:
539:
535:
531:
527:
523:
519:
516:
515:
514:
513:
510:
506:
502:
498:
495:
492:
489:
485:
482:
481:
476:
472:
468:
464:
461:
460:
459:
458:
452:
451:
450:
449:
444:
440:
439:
438:
437:
431:
427:
426:
425:
424:
418:
414:
410:
409:
408:
407:
401:
397:
393:
392:
391:
390:
385:
381:
378:
376:
373:
369:
365:
361:
358:
354:
350:
346:
342:
339:sources with
338:
334:
331:
330:
329:
325:
319:
313:
307:
303:
299:
296:
295:
291:
287:
283:
279:
274:
271:
267:
263:
259:
254:
253:
252:
251:
247:
243:
239:
235:
225:
221:
218:
215:
211:
207:
203:
200:
197:
194:
191:
188:
185:
182:
179:
175:
172:
171:Find sources:
167:
164:
158:
154:
150:
146:
141:
137:
132:
128:
124:
120:
116:
115:
111:
108:
105:
101:
98:
96:
93:
91:
88:
87:
86:
84:
79:
72:
69:
67:
66:
62:
58:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
584:
582:
568:Adumbrativus
563:
546:
521:
483:
379:
359:
304:and lack of
297:
231:
219:
213:
205:
198:
192:
186:
180:
170:
76:
49:
47:
31:
28:
528:is useful.
337:WP:RELIABLE
196:free images
524:too, Also
300:, Several
589:talk page
551:Guy Macon
387:resources
341:WP:SIGCOV
333:Kieran207
311:Kieran207
306:WP:SIGCOV
262:Guy Macon
242:Guy Macon
37:talk page
591:or in a
547:Neutral:
323:Contribs
238:WP:NSOFT
163:View log
104:glossary
39:or in a
380:Comment
368:LWN.net
202:WP refs
190:scholar
136:protect
131:history
81:New to
530:Charmk
488:WP:GNG
467:Charmk
400:FOSDEM
384:GitHub
302:WP:SPS
298:Delete
234:WP:GNG
174:Google
140:delete
57:Earwig
217:JSTOR
178:books
157:views
149:watch
145:links
16:<
572:talk
564:Keep
555:talk
534:talk
522:Keep
518:Kvng
505:talk
501:Kvng
496:and
484:Keep
471:talk
463:Kvng
441:(4)
428:(3)
411:(2)
394:(1)
360:Keep
349:talk
345:Kvng
317:talk
286:talk
266:talk
246:talk
210:FENS
184:news
153:logs
127:talk
123:edit
61:talk
52:. —
50:keep
499:. ~
490:by
366:on
343:? ~
308:.--
236:or
224:TWL
161:– (
55:The
574:)
557:)
536:)
507:)
493:,
473:)
351:)
326:)
288:)
280:.
268:)
260:.
248:)
240:.
204:)
155:|
151:|
147:|
143:|
138:|
134:|
129:|
125:|
63:)
570:(
553:(
532:(
503:(
469:(
347:(
320:-
314:(
284:(
264:(
244:(
228:)
220:·
214:·
206:·
199:·
193:·
187:·
181:·
176:(
168:(
165:)
159:)
121:(
106:)
102:(
59:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.