350:
wording of this exemption indicates that it does not apply in this case. According to the exemption, "Knowledge editors are encouraged to take photographs or draw pictures or diagrams and upload them, releasing them under the GFDL or another free license, to illustrate articles." However, this picture is not under a free license; it is included under a claim of fair use. The following sentence reiterates this: "Also, because of copyright law in a number of countries and its relationship to the work of building a 💕, there are relatively few publicly available images we can take and use. Knowledge editors' pictures fill a needed role." This image was not taken by a
Knowledge editor and is not under a free license, so the exemption does not apply. Furthermore, "A disadvantage of allowing original photographs to be uploaded is the possibility of editors using photo manipulation to distort the facts or position being illustrated by the photo. Manipulated images should be prominently noted as such. Images that constitute original research in any other way are not allowed."
301:
to home, as a good image should." Another has stated "this image communicates its viewpoint effectively in a way that words simply cannot.' Using an image in this manner to achieve an emotional effect may (or may not) be appropriate in some forms of journalism, but it is not appropriate for an encyclopedia that strives to adhere to the neutral point of view.
38:
322:
heavily on rumors and personal opinions. Questionable sources should only be used in articles about themselves. Articles about such sources should not repeat any contentious claims the source has made about third parties, unless those claims have also been published by reliable sources." An editor for
328:
who attempted to use
Zombietime as a source was severely criticized by other newspapermen for having done so, and the information in question was later found to be untrue. Knowledge standards should be no lower than those expected of mainstream newspapers; indeed, as an encyclopedia, we should strive
300:
of its shock value and emotive content. One argued that "ood images invoke an emotional response; that's one of the main things that makes them good," and described the
Zombietime image as an "bviously relevant and striking image – thus the multiple attempts to get rid of it. It strikes a bit close
317:
states that "self-published books, newsletters, personal websites, open wikis, blogs, forum postings, and similar sources are largely not acceptable." Such sources may only be used in a few carefully delimited circumstances, none of which apply to this image. Whether or not it is a blog, Zombietime
377:
no reliable sources discussing the image in the context of new antisemitism. Classifying the image as new antisemitism without a source therefore constitutes forbidden original research. This photograph is a primary source, and, as such, we can "only make descriptive claims about the information
349:
in articles. This is defined as "unpublished facts, arguments, speculation, and ideas; and any unpublished analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to advance a position." (Emphasis added.) There is a partial exemption to this policy for photographs and other images. However, the
321:
The policy section on questionable sources is particularly of interest here: "Questionable sources are those with a poor reputation for fact-checking. Such sources include websites and publications that express views that are widely acknowledged as extremist, are promotional in nature, or rely
224:
argues that "new antisemitism" is actually a conflation of several different phenomena, that the use of the term is unhelpful, and that, as a result of this discourse, "legitimate moral and political views about Israel and
Zionism" have been "branded anti-Semitic." Of course, other prominent
244:
exist and that this poster is an example of it. The caption says, without qualification, that "this placard mixes anti-American, anti-Zionist, and anti-globalization imagery with classic antisemitic motifs." Several sources are cited for these assertions, but most of them are blogs or other
332:
The verifiability policy dovetails with neutrality, and the wording of the page reiterates the importance of not giving undue weight to fringe sources. Zombietime's actions indicate that it is a deeply biased and sensationalist source; for instance, the author keeps an extensive gallery of
157:
of the poster which comprises the majority of the frame. The artist who drew the poster has not provided a valid free license for the image contained therein. Although the artist's name is not specified on the image description page, a statement says that it is "available upon request."
165:, who described the photograph as "a crazy image of Jewish devils torching the globe — an image whose economy of distribution (before Knowledge got its hands on it) consisted of having been designed by one crank, held aloft by a second, and photographed by a third."
268:
and types in "new antisemitism" (with or without quotes), they will be directed to the
Knowledge article as the first hit. This article then prominently displays a disgusting fringe placard which has virtually no notability outside of Knowledge itself. In contrast, a
205:, "We are supposed to "assert facts, including facts about opinions — but do not assert the opinions themselves." We are also required to avoid giving undue weight to fringe and minority views. Moreover, "Undue weight applies to more than just viewpoints."
378:
found in the primary source, the accuracy and applicability of which is easily verifiable by any reasonable, educated person without specialist knowledge." In this case, reasonable and educated people
233:, disagree with this analysis. Nonetheless, our encyclopedic responsibility is to present all such views in a neutral manner, in accordance with their prominence and weight in the reliable sources.
281:
reliable sources as a possible example of new antisemitism, is much smaller and much further down in the article. This placement of the image prioritizes a fringe website above an editorial by a
119:. There has been some controversy as to the exact nature of this material. According to the author, "Zombietime is not a blog. It is simply a Web site." Nonetheless, it has been described in
212:, in particular, violates the neutrality policy. As discussed in that article, the very existence of "new antisemitism" as a real phenomenon is disputed by several reliable sources.
161:
The inclusion of this image has been controversial, with some users opposing its inclusion while others just as adamantly defend it. The opposition case was summed up pithily by
357:
constitutes original research in a manner forbidden by
Knowledge policy and not covered by the narrow exemption for free images. There has been extensive dispute on the
989:
I would add that just looking at the image makes me squirm - that tells me that this image communicates its viewpoint effectively in a way that words simply cannot.
401:
Zombietime, a fringe self-published website, is not a reliable source and should not be used as a reference for anything on
Knowledge except its
592:
805:
248:
Perhaps more importantly, the use of this image clearly violates the policy on undue weight. It is currently featured prominently in the
146:
135:
94:
53:
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more
Knowledge contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of
54:
202:
178:
415:
has a narrow exception for noncontroversial, free-content images produced by
Knowledge editors, but this does not apply here.
912:
764:
756:
412:
346:
186:
127:
108:
398:
article, where its presence is especially inappropriate and in flagrant violation of
Knowledge's core content policies.
394:
Ideally, this image should be deleted entirely. Should that not prove feasible, it should at least be removed from the
858:
286:
411:
applies to "any material that is challenged or is likely to be challenged." There is no exclusion for photographs.
370:
310:
120:
150:
270:
240:
fails Knowledge's neutrality obligations. It essentially says, in the encyclopedic voice, that new antisemitism
130:, the image in question was uploaded to Knowledge on August 30, 2006. It is currently used in three articles:
904:
543:
408:
314:
290:
182:
482:
373:, and the personal opinions of editors would be irrelevant. With the Zombietime photograph, however, there
201:
The Wikimedia Foundation mandates "neutral point of view as the guiding editorial principle." According to
365:, or something else. This would not be an issue if we had sources discussing the image, as we do with the
17:
256:
different articles. Moreover, depending on the revision, the caption often contains a link to either the
189:. The current use of the Zombietime photograph doesn't just violate one of these principles; it violates
809:
358:
90:
1053:
695:
547:
854:
58:
850:
774:
748:
282:
213:
68:
1006:
437:
402:
257:
139:
116:
1020:
950:
908:
872:
823:
760:
709:
663:
617:
564:
503:
451:
395:
354:
237:
209:
174:
131:
46:
1033:
1002:
963:
885:
836:
787:
734:
722:
676:
630:
577:
528:
516:
464:
334:
230:
154:
486:
324:
226:
1047:
61:. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.
362:
149:. Although "zombie" has given authorization for his photograph to be used under a
23:
162:
801:
221:
216:, in particular, has written that the concept is simply a shield to "immunize
433:
382:
whether the image is an example of new antisemitism, and we have no reliable
933:
649:
112:
753:
Beyond Chutzpah: On the Misuse of Anti-Semitism and the Abuse of History
596:
497:
He based his charge on an account in the anonymous blog zombietime.com.
944:
Obviously relevant and striking image It strikes a bit close to home
296:
A few editors have advocated the inclusion of the image specifically
265:
217:
142:. In all three articles, it has been prominently placed in the lead.
177:
article, is highly problematic. Our three core content policies are
901:
The Resurgence of Anti-Semitism: Jews, Israel, and Liberal Opinion
691:
369:
cover; in that case, we could simply summarize what was said in
293:, which is a blatant violation of Knowledge's neutrality rules.
93:, regarding the inclusion of a photograph allegedly taken at a
32:
261:
89:
There has been a great deal of controversy, particularly on
611:) claims to be a 'photoblogger' who lives in San Francisco.
544:"Design Unveiled for Shanksville, PA's Flight 93 Memorial"
173:
The inclusion of the Zombietime image, especially on the
806:"In search of clarity: Brian Klug defines anti-Semitism"
978:
929:
645:
76:
361:
over whether the image constitutes new antisemitism,
111:
was taken by "zombie," the pseudonymous author of a
236:Placing the Zombietime photograph in the lead of
208:Placing the Zombietime photograph in the lead of
558:As noted on the conservative blog Zombietime...
8:
593:"Right-wing 'Zombie' taunts foes on the web"
476:
474:
277:, which has been specifically discussed in
347:forbids the inclusion of original research
264:. Currently, if an average user goes to
977:Custodiet ipsos custodes (2007-12-17).
424:
145:The image is deployed under a claim of
1029:
1028:Italic or bold markup not allowed in:
1018:
959:
958:Italic or bold markup not allowed in:
948:
881:
880:Italic or bold markup not allowed in:
870:
832:
831:Italic or bold markup not allowed in:
821:
783:
772:
730:
729:Italic or bold markup not allowed in:
718:
707:
672:
671:Italic or bold markup not allowed in:
661:
626:
625:Italic or bold markup not allowed in:
615:
573:
572:Italic or bold markup not allowed in:
562:
524:
523:Italic or bold markup not allowed in:
512:
501:
460:
459:Italic or bold markup not allowed in:
449:
405:. This includes both text and images.
315:The Knowledge policy on verifiability
7:
95:San Francisco anti-war rally in 2003
136:Anti-globalization and antisemitism
1003:"The Really Truly Hillary Gallery"
782:Cite has empty unknown parameter:
717:Cite has empty unknown parameter:
511:Cite has empty unknown parameter:
434:"The Red Cross Ambulance Incident"
318:is unquestionably self-published.
313:according to Knowledge standards.
59:thoroughly vetted by the community
55:Knowledge's policies or guidelines
31:
542:Lucchino, Jennifer (2005-09-15).
36:
646:"Suggestion for moving forward"
757:University of California Press
386:source to clear up the issue.
1:
855:"Graffiti on History's Walls"
483:"Downer blogged down on hoax"
153:license, the photograph is a
859:U.S. News & World Report
309:Zombietime is clearly not a
591:Chandler, Jo (2006-09-02).
1070:
899:Harrison, Bernard (2006).
291:scholarly publishing house
66:
692:"Meta: Foundation issues"
481:Dodd, Mark (2006-08-31).
353:The use of this image on
905:Rowman & Littlefield
287:major U.S. news magazine
245:unverifiable Web sites.
329:to set the bar higher.
169:Problems with the image
851:Zuckerman, Mortimer B.
363:classical antisemitism
225:commentators, such as
18:User:Crotalus horridus
644:G-Dett (2008-01-06).
432:zombie (2006-08-23).
283:prominent commentator
197:Neutral point of view
179:neutral point of view
91:Talk:New antisemitism
57:, as it has not been
928:Jayjg (2008-01-04).
548:Architectural Record
413:No original research
341:No original research
220:against criticism."
187:no original research
128:its description page
749:Finkelstein, Norman
696:Wikimedia Meta-Wiki
345:Knowledge's policy
258:Zombietime article
214:Norman Finkelstein
759:. p. 21-22.
690:Various authors.
359:article Talk page
87:
86:
24:Knowledge:CH/PWZI
22:(Redirected from
1061:
1038:
1037:
1031:
1030:|publisher=
1026:
1024:
1016:
1014:
1013:
998:
992:
991:
986:
985:
974:
968:
967:
961:
960:|publisher=
956:
954:
946:
941:
940:
925:
919:
918:
896:
890:
889:
883:
882:|publisher=
878:
876:
868:
866:
865:
847:
841:
840:
834:
833:|publisher=
829:
827:
819:
817:
816:
798:
792:
791:
785:
780:
778:
770:
745:
739:
738:
732:
731:|publisher=
726:
720:
715:
713:
705:
703:
702:
687:
681:
680:
674:
673:|publisher=
669:
667:
659:
657:
656:
641:
635:
634:
628:
627:|publisher=
623:
621:
613:
604:
603:
588:
582:
581:
575:
574:|publisher=
570:
568:
560:
555:
554:
539:
533:
532:
526:
525:|publisher=
520:
514:
509:
507:
499:
494:
493:
478:
469:
468:
462:
461:|publisher=
457:
455:
447:
445:
444:
429:
396:New antisemitism
371:reliable sources
355:New antisemitism
289:and a book by a
238:New antisemitism
210:New antisemitism
175:New antisemitism
132:New antisemitism
121:reliable sources
79:
40:
39:
33:
27:
1069:
1068:
1064:
1063:
1062:
1060:
1059:
1058:
1044:
1043:
1042:
1041:
1027:
1017:
1011:
1009:
1000:
999:
995:
983:
981:
976:
975:
971:
957:
947:
938:
936:
927:
926:
922:
915:
898:
897:
893:
879:
869:
863:
861:
849:
848:
844:
830:
820:
814:
812:
800:
799:
795:
781:
771:
767:
747:
746:
742:
728:
716:
706:
700:
698:
689:
688:
684:
670:
660:
654:
652:
643:
642:
638:
624:
614:
601:
599:
590:
589:
585:
571:
561:
552:
550:
541:
540:
536:
522:
510:
500:
491:
489:
480:
479:
472:
458:
448:
442:
440:
431:
430:
426:
421:
392:
343:
335:Hillary Clinton
311:reliable source
307:
231:Alan Dershowitz
203:the policy page
199:
171:
155:derivative work
105:
83:
82:
75:
71:
63:
62:
51:
37:
29:
28:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1067:
1065:
1057:
1056:
1046:
1045:
1040:
1039:
993:
969:
930:"Keep in lede"
920:
913:
891:
853:(2003-03-11).
842:
810:Catalyst Forum
804:(2006-03-17).
793:
765:
740:
682:
636:
583:
534:
487:The Australian
470:
423:
422:
420:
417:
391:
388:
342:
339:
333:"Unflattering
325:The Australian
306:
303:
271:controversial
262:website itself
227:Abraham Foxman
198:
195:
170:
167:
104:
101:
85:
84:
81:
80:
72:
67:
64:
52:
43:
41:
30:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1066:
1055:
1052:
1051:
1049:
1035:
1022:
1008:
1004:
997:
994:
990:
980:
973:
970:
965:
952:
945:
935:
931:
924:
921:
916:
910:
906:
902:
895:
892:
887:
874:
860:
856:
852:
846:
843:
838:
825:
811:
807:
803:
797:
794:
789:
776:
768:
762:
758:
754:
750:
744:
741:
736:
724:
711:
697:
693:
686:
683:
678:
665:
651:
647:
640:
637:
632:
619:
612:
610:
598:
594:
587:
584:
579:
566:
559:
549:
545:
538:
535:
530:
518:
505:
498:
488:
484:
477:
475:
471:
466:
453:
439:
435:
428:
425:
418:
416:
414:
410:
409:Verifiability
406:
404:
399:
397:
389:
387:
385:
381:
376:
372:
368:
367:New Statesman
364:
360:
356:
351:
348:
340:
338:
336:
330:
327:
326:
319:
316:
312:
305:Verifiability
304:
302:
299:
294:
292:
288:
284:
280:
276:
274:
273:New Statesman
267:
263:
259:
255:
251:
246:
243:
239:
234:
232:
228:
223:
219:
215:
211:
206:
204:
196:
194:
192:
188:
184:
183:verifiability
180:
176:
168:
166:
164:
159:
156:
152:
148:
143:
141:
137:
133:
129:
126:According to
124:
122:
118:
114:
110:
102:
100:
98:
96:
92:
78:
74:
73:
70:
65:
60:
56:
50:
48:
42:
35:
34:
25:
19:
1010:. Retrieved
996:
988:
982:. Retrieved
972:
943:
937:. Retrieved
923:
900:
894:
862:. Retrieved
845:
813:. Retrieved
796:
752:
743:
699:. Retrieved
685:
653:. Retrieved
639:
608:
606:
600:. Retrieved
586:
557:
551:. Retrieved
537:
496:
490:. Retrieved
441:. Retrieved
427:
407:
400:
393:
383:
379:
374:
366:
352:
344:
331:
323:
320:
308:
297:
295:
278:
272:
253:
249:
247:
241:
235:
207:
200:
190:
172:
160:
144:
125:
106:
99:
88:
44:
1054:User essays
802:Klug, Brian
403:own article
275:cover image
123:as a blog.
45:This is an
1012:2008-01-13
1007:Zombietime
984:2008-01-13
939:2008-01-13
914:0742552276
864:2008-01-12
815:2008-01-13
766:0520245989
701:2008-01-13
655:2008-01-13
602:2008-01-13
553:2008-01-13
492:2008-01-13
443:2008-01-13
438:Zombietime
419:References
390:Conclusion
260:or to the
222:Brian Klug
140:Zombietime
117:Zombietime
103:Background
77:WP:CH/PWZI
934:Knowledge
775:cite book
650:Knowledge
384:secondary
337:Photos."
191:all three
1048:Category
1021:cite web
1001:zombie.
951:cite web
873:cite web
824:cite web
784:|1=
751:(2005).
719:|1=
710:cite web
664:cite web
618:cite web
565:cite web
513:|1=
504:cite web
452:cite web
380:disagree
279:multiple
147:fair use
113:Web site
69:Shortcut
597:The Age
298:because
115:called
979:"Keep"
911:
763:
609:zombie
266:Google
218:Israel
185:, and
163:G-Dett
138:, and
285:in a
254:three
151:CC-BY
109:image
47:essay
16:<
1034:help
964:help
909:ISBN
886:help
837:help
788:help
761:ISBN
735:help
723:help
677:help
631:help
607:He (
578:help
529:help
517:help
465:help
250:lead
242:does
229:and
107:The
375:are
252:of
1050::
1025::
1023:}}
1019:{{
1005:.
987:.
955::
953:}}
949:{{
942:.
932:.
907:.
903:.
877::
875:}}
871:{{
857:.
828::
826:}}
822:{{
808:.
779::
777:}}
773:{{
755:.
727:;
714::
712:}}
708:{{
694:.
668::
666:}}
662:{{
648:.
622::
620:}}
616:{{
605:.
595:.
569::
567:}}
563:{{
556:.
546:.
521:;
508::
506:}}
502:{{
495:.
485:.
473:^
456::
454:}}
450:{{
436:.
193:.
181:,
134:,
97:.
1036:)
1032:(
1015:.
966:)
962:(
917:.
888:)
884:(
867:.
839:)
835:(
818:.
790:)
786:(
769:.
737:)
733:(
725:)
721:(
704:.
679:)
675:(
658:.
633:)
629:(
580:)
576:(
531:)
527:(
519:)
515:(
467:)
463:(
446:.
49:.
26:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.