Knowledge

:Evaluating sources - Knowledge

Source 📝

722:
encyclopedias or textbooks, may also be useful to cite for general propositions about a field. However, there are three issues to consider when using review articles. First, like any restated material, review articles may have errors. In a conflict over what a paper said, the peer-reviewed publication is more authoritative and reliable than a review article's summation of the publication's findings. Second, a review article may summarize later research or findings that shed new light on earlier research. If possible, the summarized later research should be reviewed and cited
624:. Editors should not use public records as a source about a subject — such as birth certificates, home evaluations, traffic citations, vehicle registrations, or trial transcripts — unless these have been used by a reliable, secondary source. For example, if writing about a subject who had a messy divorce, do not go the courthouse to retrieve court papers about it; instead, rely on secondary sources, such as mainstream newspapers, that have written about the divorce. If they have not written about it, nor should Knowledge. 35: 698:
coverage is not available for all scientific topics, and is not required to establish reliability of a scientific proposition. Lay-person language interpretations, if confusing or inaccurate, should be buttressed by reference to the original material. In a conflict, the peer-reviewed publication is more authoritative and reliable.
102: 171:. In brief, a primary source is one close to the event with firsthand knowledge (for example, an eyewitness); a secondary source is at least one step removed (for example, a book about an event written by someone not involved in it); and a tertiary source is an encyclopaedia or textbook that provides a general overview. 721:
Review articles are articles published within scientific journals that survey and synthesize the state of research in a particular area. Review articles can be very helpful in understanding a topic, and on-point review articles should be cited or included as "further research". Review articles, like
680:
as a source for propositions, ideas, observations, and other scientific data. However, care must be taken that multiple propositions, ideas, observations, and other data are not stitched together to form a new proposition or idea. The sum total of a piece of writing in Knowledge should not advance a
195:
are sources of original work, as well as historical items and references close to the subject. Depending on the field, this can range from speeches, personal correspondence, published editorials, manuscripts, works of fiction, incidents captured on film, photographs, artwork, witness reports, legal
697:
Newspaper articles, encyclopedias, and textbooks that distill peer-reviewed literature and scientific findings into lay-person language may be easier to understand for the non-expert. If available, they must be used carefully as they are further interpretations of the original work. This sort of
174:
The way these concepts are applied to particular sources can change over time. A newspaper article that we regard as a secondary source now, might be regarded as a primary source in 100 years, because it would be close to the event in relation to those reading about that event 100 years from now.
206:
are reports that draw on research and other references to make interpretive, analytical, or synthesized claims. Depending on the field, these may include textbooks, review articles, and peer-reviewed articles publishing original research. They are best used for representing significant points of
726:
when describing any points from that research; however, it is permissible to reference the review article as citing the earlier material. Third, a review article that advances new information or its own new synthesis may be cited for those propositions, just as any publication may. However, the
709:, as published in the newspaper or on the blog, are not as reliable a description of that research as a peer-reviewed journal article. If it is important to discuss such findings in the Knowledge article, the most reliable source available should be used. If a peer-reviewed article is published 848:
An article from an old newspaper is regarded as primary-source material for an historian looking back at that period, because it's an example of writing that stems directly from the timeframe and the society he's studying. However, a recent newspaper report of, for example, a car accident is a
795:
notes that a secondary source "analyzes and interprets primary sources", is a "second-hand account of an historical event" or "interprets creative work". It also states that a secondary source "analyzes and interprets research results" or "analyzes and interprets scientific
560:
are the two core content policies that determine how sources are used on Knowledge. All sources should be used in a way that does not give rise to analyses, syntheses, or original conclusions. Original analysis by Wikipedians may not be added to articles.
664:
When evaluating sources of scientific material, sources that were evaluated by someone other than the scientist / author when they were published are the most reliable. This includes peer-reviewed articles in scientific journals. The general rule is to
225:
These definitions are not mutually exclusive. Primary sources, for example, might draw on secondary sources to make interpretive, analytic, or synthetic claims. In such cases, sources should be evaluated according to how they are used.
1036: 571:
only make descriptive claims about the material found in the primary source, the accuracy and applicability of which is easily verifiable by any reasonable, educated person without specialist knowledge,
186: 143:
The decision as to which sources are appropriate in any given situation is a matter of common sense and good editorial judgment, and should be discussed on individual article talk pages to achieve
1283: 876: 889: 1198: 705:
accuracy. For example, a newspaper may run an article on a scientist and her latest work, or a scientist might maintain a blog about his research. The descriptions of the scientist's
1530: 713:
a newspaper, blog, or other non-peer-reviewed publication of the research, both may be used, but in a conflict, the peer-reviewed publication is more authoritative and reliable.
261:
architectural model or drawing, building or structure, letter, motion picture, organizational records, painting, personal account, photograph, print, sculpture, sketch book
1029: 1456: 638:
A subject merits its own article on Knowledge when it is notable enough to have received acknowledgment in multiple, reliable, secondary sources. If an article lacks
110:
When using primary sources, editors should stick to describing what the sources say. Any interpretive claims, analyses, or synthetic claims require a secondary source.
869: 579:
Tertiary sources can be useful in providing context and avoiding original research in topics where there exist very large amounts of primary or secondary sources.
1755: 1489: 1213: 862: 701:
Scientific findings that are originally presented in non-peer reviewed literature must be used with particular care, as they have not been reviewed for
116:
This essay examines how to evaluate sources within the context of Knowledge's content policies. Part of evaluating a source is deciding whether it is a
1689: 1484: 1223: 965: 588: 1504: 1290: 1159: 301:
artifact, diary, government report, interview, letter, map, news report, oral history, organizational records, photograph, speech, work of art
567:
Primary sources that have been published by a reliable source may be used, but any part of an article that relies on a primary source should:
564:
Edits should not rely on unclear or inconsistent passages. Passages should not be taken out of context in a way that changes their meaning.
808:
states simply that: "Secondary sources are works of synthesis and interpretation based upon primary sources and the work of other authors."
673:. Journal articles that have passed through the peer-review process are thus the most highly reliable sources of scientific information. 1587: 293:
government report, interview, letter, personal account, press release, public opinion survey, speech, treaty or international agreement
1477: 54:
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Knowledge contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of
1509: 886: 836: 736: 55: 1499: 1494: 1514: 1451: 960: 955: 643: 575:
make no analytic, synthetic, interpretive, explanatory, or evaluative claims about the information found in the primary source.
1228: 1188: 1129: 1046: 974: 950: 774: 594: 553: 544: 133: 129: 1124: 333:
case study, clinical case report, experimental replication, follow-up study, longitudinal study, treatment outcome study
1719: 1666: 1540: 1218: 1193: 1139: 1582: 1358: 1305: 1278: 1208: 1183: 593:
Material about living persons must be sourced very carefully. Without reliable secondary sources, it will violate the
196:
documents, laboratory notebooks, field notes, peer-reviewed articles publishing original research, and even artifacts.
217:
are materials that provide an overview of primary and secondary sources, such as encyclopedias, textbooks, and other
1704: 1154: 1149: 1119: 1024: 980: 908: 1750: 1472: 1353: 1273: 1056: 1051: 1535: 1441: 1396: 1348: 1343: 1061: 1019: 985: 746: 1661: 1429: 1014: 945: 598: 557: 548: 137: 349: 1424: 1144: 1134: 1076: 901: 1295: 849:
secondary source regarding that accident, unless the reporter was personally involved or an eye witness.
922: 527: 1728: 1594: 1233: 1109: 1041: 1009: 970: 633: 602: 1599: 1300: 1203: 1114: 1104: 144: 59: 1611: 1606: 1250: 1099: 69: 669:. The critical element in evaluating the source of material that is to be included in Knowledge 1671: 1446: 1436: 833: 771: 741: 47: 341:
cultural artifact, interview, oral history, organizational records, statistical data, survey
854: 821: 685:, even if each individual component is sourced to highly reliable peer-reviewed literature; 164: 140:. If there are inconsistencies between this page and the policies, please update this page. 43: 285:
building or structure, map, geological survey, patent, schematic drawing, technical report
1651: 617: 168: 805: 793:, New York: Borough of Manhattan Commmunity College, A. Philip Randolph Memorial Library 825: 613: 160: 727:
source should be carefully evaluated because review articles may not be peer reviewed
1744: 1320: 606: 317:
contemporary review, interview, letter, manuscript, personal account, published work
1628: 62:. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints. 682: 621: 148: 1656: 17: 693:
Newspaper articles, encyclopedias, textbooks, and other non-peer-reviewed sources
1373: 788: 218: 620:. The use of primary sources may easily lead to syntheses that constitute 352:. Lafayette College Libraries and Academic Information Resources. 2005 325:
contemporary review, letter, personal account, score, sound recording
147:. In cases where a consensus is not forthcoming, it may be helpful to 612:
Material about living persons must be carefully evaluated to ensure
487:
Original research on nematodes published in a peer-reviewed journal
671:
was previously published in a source that reviewed that information
830:
A Manual for Writers of Research Papers, Theses, and Dissertations
642:
that reasonably demonstrate its importance, it may be listed for
858: 368: 96: 29: 187:
Knowledge:Identifying and using primary and secondary sources
1559: 84: 77: 1636: 1624: 1567: 1557: 1523: 1465: 1405: 1381: 1371: 1328: 1318: 1258: 1248: 1168: 1084: 1074: 994: 930: 920: 687:
original research may not be published in Knowledge
159:Sources of information are commonly categorized as 828:; Colomb, Gregory G.; Williams, Joseph M. (2007), 650:Academic definitions of primary/secondary sources 526:Table source: Saylor, Ward & Hooper, Helen – 309:code, statute, court opinion, legislative report 277:company statistics, consumer survey, data series 1037:Do not include copies of lengthy primary sources 128:source. For the policy on sourcing issues, see 1199:Do not disrupt Knowledge to illustrate a point 870: 269:field notes, plant specimen, research report 149:seek some assistance in reaching an agreement 8: 1625: 766:Student Guide to Research in the Digital Age 1531:Categories, lists, and navigation templates 790:Research Help:Primary vs. Secondary Sources 1633: 1564: 1417: 1378: 1325: 1255: 1081: 927: 877: 863: 855: 816: 814: 253:artifact, field notes, fossil, photograph 238: 681:unique or novel interpretation. This is 179:Primary, secondary, and tertiary sources 757: 589:Knowledge:Biographies of living persons 500: 489: 486: 481: 7: 501:Review of current nematode research 1756:Knowledge essays about verification 1690:List of all policies and guidelines 539:Original research and verifiability 474:Monograph on learning disabilities 471:Notes from a clinical psychologist 1729:Summaries of values and principles 1570: 1408: 1171: 997: 60:thoroughly vetted by the community 56:Knowledge's policies or guidelines 25: 737:Knowledge:Sources - SWOT analysis 350:"Primary Sources, What Are They?" 221:. Knowledge is a tertiary source. 1639: 1384: 1331: 1261: 1214:Please do not bite the newcomers 1087: 933: 832:, Chicago: UC Press, pp. 25–27, 806:The National History Day website 100: 33: 707:previously unpublished findings 545:Knowledge:No original research 458:Book about a genre of fiction 429:Patent literature usage guide 410:Criticism of Vincent van Gogh 134:Knowledge:No original research 1: 1224:Responding to threats of harm 966:Biographies of living persons 607:Biographies of living persons 583:Biographies of living persons 393: 386: 379: 372: 1291:Criteria for speedy deletion 1160:Paid-contribution disclosure 676:Peer-reviewed literature is 426:Derwent World Patents Index 1772: 667:always consider the source 631: 586: 542: 517:Biography of a playwright 507: 499: 480: 464: 448: 432: 416: 400: 184: 67: 27:Essay on editing Knowledge 1684: 1420: 896: 764:Stebbins, Leslie Foster. 519: 516: 513: 508: 503: 494: 476: 473: 470: 465: 460: 457: 454: 449: 444: 441: 438: 433: 428: 425: 422: 417: 412: 409: 406: 401: 392: 385: 378: 371: 245:types of primary sources 747:Knowledge:Reference Desk 660:Peer-reviewed literature 108:This page in a nutshell: 48:Primary sources policies 1667:Licensing and copyright 887:policies and guidelines 639: 549:Knowledge:Verifiability 138:Knowledge:Verifiability 787:Thomas, Susan (2007), 477:Psychology dictionary 1662:Friendly space policy 1452:Broad-concept article 961:What Knowledge is not 956:Neutral point of view 768:. Libraries Unlimited 614:neutral point of view 605:policies, as well as 528:James Cook University 504:Biological abstracts 491:Biological abstracts 185:Further information: 58:, as it has not been 1229:Talk page guidelines 1189:Conflict of interest 1130:Ownership of content 975:Copyright violations 951:No original research 634:Knowledge:Notability 595:No original research 554:No Original Research 413:Encyclopedia of Art 1125:No personal attacks 1047:Don't create hoaxes 770:, 2006, pp. 61–79. 1720:List of guidelines 1541:Template namespace 1219:Courtesy vanishing 1194:Disruptive editing 1140:Dispute resolution 18:Knowledge:EVALUATE 1738: 1737: 1680: 1679: 1620: 1619: 1583:Project namespace 1553: 1552: 1549: 1548: 1490:Dates and numbers 1457:Understandability 1367: 1366: 1314: 1313: 1306:Revision deletion 1279:Proposed deletion 1244: 1243: 1209:Gaming the system 1184:Assume good faith 1070: 1069: 683:original research 640:secondary sources 622:original research 530: 523: 522: 365:Examples by field 361: 345: 344: 204:Secondary sources 114: 113: 95: 94: 16:(Redirected from 1763: 1751:Knowledge essays 1715: 1714: 1705:List of policies 1700: 1699: 1657:List of policies 1644: 1643: 1642: 1634: 1630: 1627: 1575: 1574: 1573: 1565: 1561: 1558:Project content 1418: 1413: 1412: 1411: 1389: 1388: 1387: 1379: 1375: 1336: 1335: 1334: 1326: 1322: 1266: 1265: 1264: 1256: 1252: 1176: 1175: 1174: 1155:Child protection 1150:No legal threats 1120:Ignore all rules 1092: 1091: 1090: 1082: 1078: 1025:Reliable sources 1002: 1001: 1000: 938: 937: 936: 928: 924: 909:Ignore all rules 891: 879: 872: 865: 856: 850: 846: 840: 839: 822:Turabian, Kate L 818: 809: 803: 797: 794: 784: 778: 762: 525: 514:Video of a play 461:Poetry Handbook 445:Biography index 369: 360: 358: 357: 347: 242:field/discipline 239: 215:Tertiary sources 169:tertiary sources 155:Types of sources 104: 103: 97: 87: 80: 37: 36: 30: 21: 1771: 1770: 1766: 1765: 1764: 1762: 1761: 1760: 1741: 1740: 1739: 1734: 1712: 1711: 1697: 1696: 1676: 1640: 1638: 1616: 1571: 1569: 1545: 1519: 1473:Manual of Style 1461: 1409: 1407: 1401: 1385: 1383: 1363: 1359:Page protection 1332: 1330: 1310: 1274:Deletion policy 1262: 1260: 1240: 1172: 1170: 1164: 1088: 1086: 1066: 1057:Patent nonsense 1052:Fringe theories 998: 996: 990: 934: 932: 916: 892: 883: 853: 847: 843: 826:Booth, Wayne C. 820: 819: 812: 804: 800: 786: 785: 781: 763: 759: 755: 733: 717:Review articles 657: 655:In the sciences 652: 636: 630: 591: 585: 551: 541: 536: 397: 390: 383: 376: 367: 355: 353: 348: 237: 235:Primary sources 232: 193:Primary sources 189: 181: 157: 101: 91: 90: 83: 76: 72: 64: 63: 34: 28: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 1769: 1767: 1759: 1758: 1753: 1743: 1742: 1736: 1735: 1733: 1732: 1725: 1724: 1723: 1708: 1685: 1682: 1681: 1678: 1677: 1675: 1674: 1672:Privacy policy 1669: 1664: 1659: 1654: 1648: 1646: 1631: 1622: 1621: 1618: 1617: 1615: 1614: 1609: 1604: 1603: 1602: 1592: 1591: 1590: 1579: 1577: 1562: 1555: 1554: 1551: 1550: 1547: 1546: 1544: 1543: 1538: 1536:Categorization 1533: 1527: 1525: 1524:Classification 1521: 1520: 1518: 1517: 1512: 1507: 1502: 1497: 1492: 1487: 1482: 1481: 1480: 1469: 1467: 1463: 1462: 1460: 1459: 1454: 1449: 1444: 1442:Disambiguation 1439: 1434: 1433: 1432: 1421: 1415: 1403: 1402: 1400: 1399: 1397:Editing policy 1393: 1391: 1376: 1369: 1368: 1365: 1364: 1362: 1361: 1356: 1351: 1346: 1344:Administrators 1340: 1338: 1323: 1316: 1315: 1312: 1311: 1309: 1308: 1303: 1298: 1293: 1288: 1287: 1286: 1276: 1270: 1268: 1253: 1246: 1245: 1242: 1241: 1239: 1238: 1237: 1236: 1226: 1221: 1216: 1211: 1206: 1201: 1196: 1191: 1186: 1180: 1178: 1166: 1165: 1163: 1162: 1157: 1152: 1147: 1142: 1137: 1132: 1127: 1122: 1117: 1112: 1107: 1102: 1096: 1094: 1079: 1072: 1071: 1068: 1067: 1065: 1064: 1062:External links 1059: 1054: 1049: 1044: 1039: 1034: 1033: 1032: 1022: 1020:Citing sources 1017: 1012: 1006: 1004: 992: 991: 989: 988: 986:Article titles 983: 978: 968: 963: 958: 953: 948: 942: 940: 925: 918: 917: 915: 914: 913: 912: 897: 894: 893: 885:Knowledge key 884: 882: 881: 874: 867: 859: 852: 851: 841: 810: 798: 779: 756: 754: 751: 750: 749: 744: 739: 732: 729: 719: 718: 695: 694: 662: 661: 656: 653: 651: 648: 629: 626: 584: 581: 577: 576: 573: 540: 537: 535: 532: 521: 520: 518: 515: 512: 506: 505: 502: 498: 497: 493: 488: 485: 479: 478: 475: 472: 469: 463: 462: 459: 456: 453: 447: 446: 443: 440: 439:Autobiography 437: 431: 430: 427: 424: 421: 415: 414: 411: 408: 405: 399: 398: 391: 384: 377: 366: 363: 343: 342: 339: 335: 334: 331: 327: 326: 323: 319: 318: 315: 311: 310: 307: 303: 302: 299: 295: 294: 291: 287: 286: 283: 279: 278: 275: 271: 270: 267: 263: 262: 259: 255: 254: 251: 247: 246: 243: 236: 233: 231: 228: 223: 222: 209: 208: 198: 197: 180: 177: 156: 153: 112: 111: 105: 93: 92: 89: 88: 81: 73: 68: 65: 53: 52: 40: 38: 26: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1768: 1757: 1754: 1752: 1749: 1748: 1746: 1731: 1730: 1726: 1722: 1721: 1716: 1709: 1707: 1706: 1701: 1694: 1693: 1692: 1691: 1687: 1686: 1683: 1673: 1670: 1668: 1665: 1663: 1660: 1658: 1655: 1653: 1650: 1649: 1647: 1645: 1635: 1632: 1623: 1613: 1610: 1608: 1605: 1601: 1598: 1597: 1596: 1593: 1589: 1586: 1585: 1584: 1581: 1580: 1578: 1576: 1566: 1563: 1556: 1542: 1539: 1537: 1534: 1532: 1529: 1528: 1526: 1522: 1516: 1513: 1511: 1508: 1506: 1503: 1501: 1498: 1496: 1493: 1491: 1488: 1486: 1485:Accessibility 1483: 1479: 1476: 1475: 1474: 1471: 1470: 1468: 1464: 1458: 1455: 1453: 1450: 1448: 1445: 1443: 1440: 1438: 1435: 1431: 1430:Summary style 1428: 1427: 1426: 1423: 1422: 1419: 1416: 1414: 1404: 1398: 1395: 1394: 1392: 1390: 1380: 1377: 1370: 1360: 1357: 1355: 1352: 1350: 1347: 1345: 1342: 1341: 1339: 1337: 1327: 1324: 1317: 1307: 1304: 1302: 1299: 1297: 1294: 1292: 1289: 1285: 1282: 1281: 1280: 1277: 1275: 1272: 1271: 1269: 1267: 1257: 1254: 1247: 1235: 1232: 1231: 1230: 1227: 1225: 1222: 1220: 1217: 1215: 1212: 1210: 1207: 1205: 1202: 1200: 1197: 1195: 1192: 1190: 1187: 1185: 1182: 1181: 1179: 1177: 1167: 1161: 1158: 1156: 1153: 1151: 1148: 1146: 1143: 1141: 1138: 1136: 1133: 1131: 1128: 1126: 1123: 1121: 1118: 1116: 1113: 1111: 1108: 1106: 1103: 1101: 1098: 1097: 1095: 1093: 1083: 1080: 1073: 1063: 1060: 1058: 1055: 1053: 1050: 1048: 1045: 1043: 1040: 1038: 1035: 1031: 1028: 1027: 1026: 1023: 1021: 1018: 1016: 1015:Autobiography 1013: 1011: 1008: 1007: 1005: 1003: 993: 987: 984: 982: 979: 976: 972: 969: 967: 964: 962: 959: 957: 954: 952: 949: 947: 946:Verifiability 944: 943: 941: 939: 929: 926: 919: 911: 910: 906: 905: 904: 903: 899: 898: 895: 888: 880: 875: 873: 868: 866: 861: 860: 857: 845: 842: 838: 837:0-226-82337-7 835: 831: 827: 823: 817: 815: 811: 807: 802: 799: 796:discoveries". 792: 791: 783: 780: 777: 776: 773: 767: 761: 758: 752: 748: 745: 743: 740: 738: 735: 734: 730: 728: 725: 716: 715: 714: 712: 708: 704: 699: 692: 691: 690: 688: 684: 679: 674: 672: 668: 659: 658: 654: 649: 647: 645: 641: 635: 627: 625: 623: 619: 615: 610: 608: 604: 600: 599:Verifiability 596: 590: 582: 580: 574: 570: 569: 568: 565: 562: 559: 558:Verifiability 555: 550: 546: 538: 533: 531: 529: 511: 496: 492: 484: 468: 452: 436: 420: 404: 396: 389: 382: 375: 370: 364: 362: 351: 340: 337: 336: 332: 329: 328: 324: 321: 320: 316: 313: 312: 308: 305: 304: 300: 297: 296: 292: 289: 288: 284: 281: 280: 276: 273: 272: 268: 265: 264: 260: 257: 256: 252: 249: 248: 244: 241: 240: 234: 229: 227: 220: 216: 213: 212: 211: 205: 202: 201: 200: 194: 191: 190: 188: 183: 178: 176: 172: 170: 166: 162: 154: 152: 150: 146: 141: 139: 135: 131: 127: 123: 119: 109: 106: 99: 98: 86: 82: 79: 75: 74: 71: 66: 61: 57: 51: 49: 45: 39: 32: 31: 19: 1727: 1718: 1710: 1703: 1695: 1688: 1652:Terms of Use 1637: 1588:WikiProjects 1568: 1505:Lead section 1425:Article size 1406: 1382: 1329: 1319:Enforcement 1259: 1169: 1145:Sockpuppetry 1135:Edit warring 1085: 995: 931: 907: 902:Five pillars 900: 844: 829: 801: 789: 782: 769: 765: 760: 723: 720: 710: 706: 702: 700: 696: 686: 677: 675: 670: 666: 663: 637: 618:undue weight 616:, and avoid 611: 592: 578: 566: 563: 552: 543:Main pages: 524: 509: 495: 490: 482: 466: 450: 434: 418: 402: 394: 387: 380: 373: 354:. Retrieved 346: 250:Anthropology 224: 214: 210: 203: 199: 192: 182: 173: 158: 142: 130:this section 125: 121: 117: 115: 107: 41: 1296:Attack page 1284:Biographies 632:Main page: 587:Main page: 419:Engineering 282:Engineering 85:WP:EVALUATE 42:This is an 1745:Categories 1600:User boxes 1595:User pages 1234:Signatures 1110:Harassment 1042:Plagiarism 1010:Notability 775:1591580994 753:References 742:WP:LIBRARY 703:scientific 628:Notability 603:Notability 534:Evaluation 467:Psychology 451:Literature 442:Biography 374:Discipline 356:2007-12-19 330:Psychology 314:Literature 290:Government 1607:Shortcuts 1301:Oversight 1249:Deletion 1204:Etiquette 1115:Vandalism 1105:Consensus 981:Image use 971:Copyright 407:Painting 388:Secondary 338:Sociology 274:Economics 219:compendia 165:secondary 145:consensus 122:secondary 70:Shortcuts 1612:Subpages 1478:Contents 1447:Hatnotes 1372:Editing 1354:Blocking 1100:Civility 1075:Conduct 1030:Medicine 921:Content 731:See also 724:directly 678:reliable 644:deletion 395:Tertiary 230:Examples 126:tertiary 1510:Linking 1437:Be bold 1349:Banning 510:Theatre 483:Biology 435:History 423:Patent 381:Primary 298:History 266:Biology 161:primary 118:primary 78:WP:EVAL 46:on the 1500:Layout 1495:Images 601:, and 455:Novel 136:, and 1515:Lists 1466:Style 711:after 322:Music 207:view. 167:, or 124:, or 44:essay 834:ISBN 772:ISBN 556:and 547:and 1629:(?) 1626:WMF 1560:(?) 1374:(?) 1321:(?) 1251:(?) 1077:(?) 923:(?) 890:(?) 572:and 403:Art 306:Law 258:Art 132:of 1747:: 1717:: 1702:: 824:; 813:^ 689:. 646:. 609:. 597:, 163:, 151:. 120:, 1713:G 1698:P 1641:P 1572:G 1410:G 1386:P 1333:P 1263:P 1173:G 1089:P 999:G 977:) 973:( 935:P 878:e 871:t 864:v 359:. 50:. 20:)

Index

Knowledge:EVALUATE
essay
Primary sources policies
Knowledge's policies or guidelines
thoroughly vetted by the community
Shortcuts
WP:EVAL
WP:EVALUATE
this section
Knowledge:No original research
Knowledge:Verifiability
consensus
seek some assistance in reaching an agreement
primary
secondary
tertiary sources
Knowledge:Identifying and using primary and secondary sources
compendia
"Primary Sources, What Are They?"
James Cook University
Knowledge:No original research
Knowledge:Verifiability
No Original Research
Verifiability
Knowledge:Biographies of living persons
No original research
Verifiability
Notability
Biographies of living persons
neutral point of view

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.