Knowledge (XXG)

:Every snowflake is unique - Knowledge (XXG)

Source đź“ť

103: 646: 24: 84: 446:. A description of items in the same category (either as tables or separate articles) is encyclopedic if it centers around a compilation of the salient properties of each item: it provides insight difficult to get using secondary sources alone, as it summarizes the best information to be found in those. 928:
This decision is an art. But you don't have to get it right the first time; create a catalog of individual articles, since a primary article can always be created later, and small articles can be merged into it if that's what makes more sense given their current state. Conversely, if you begin with a
923:
wouldn't work as a collection of articles for each core architecture (except for the major ones like ARM7, ARM9, ARM11); their differences are not significant enough, and notability is achieved by their similarities and common history. In this case it makes sense to create a single article where this
470:
is usually invoked through subjective reasons from relevance, notoriety or impact. This criterium instead gives a clear, objective test: Raw data is not enough for notability, existence of professional judgment is. It also points to the primary information that should be retrieved from those sources;
621:
If you have a mess consisting of valuable items the correct solution is to tidy them up, not throw them away. Navigation templates, lists and categories are effectively used to group related articles for better finding. Popular topics will be more linked to and obscure topics will be harder to find
548:, and this makes the source somehow non-reliable or the item non-notable. If that argument were true, we couldn't have many scientific, mathematic or history articles, since scientists and historians do routinely write papers about those topics and those papers are the sources used for the article. 873:
There will be items and products that have not received critical commentary nor significant independent coverage; the only available sources for them are press releases and self-published content. Those are not beautiful snowflakes, but poor-quality, run-of-the-mill; and should be deleted per
551:
Look at it the other way: if a whole class of professional writers perform routine reviews of products, it's work for an encyclopedia to compile and document their more relevant findings in a useful and systematic way. The key to evaluate significant coverage is that available sources can
3332: 634: 1372: 2533: 404:
allows snowflake articles to survive, since product review sites can be viewed as reliable, independent sources. The trick is to avoid using them as a source of raw data and keep the gems found in the form of critical commentary. In cases where there is
1937: 477:
This has the additional advantage that it will separate the wheat from the chaff - items which are indeed notable will be the ones more likely to have multiple independent reviewers giving judgment values than truly run-of-the-mill or on-the-shelf
428:
This has caused double standards between different types of items. Movies and video-game characters are regularly included, while webcomics and electronics are regularly disputed. A common set of rules should be applied with criteria grounded on
122:
from the other similar items, would be highly valuable knowledge for the reader interested in comparing them. This situation is typical for commercial products in the same category, geographic places reported at local media, historical records,
1402: 3219: 2668: 357:, every "repetitive" item that complies with these requirements can have its own article with the only precondition that someone is willing to write it - and that there's no consensus to merge its contents into a more encompassing 681:
A restaurant appearing in many reviews or tourist guides from different publishers, each guide giving analysis in the form of a written quality review describing its merits and shortcomings (not just 'stars' or similar range
3099: 2271: 399:
perspective. Articles in bad form but with valuable content shouldn't be deleted, they should be trimmed from bad content while keeping good and verifiable content (even if the result is a stub). A strict interpretation of
2628: 769:
In summary, Knowledge (XXG) can act as a specialized reference work or compendium, and no information is too detailed for the "sum of all human knowledge" as long as it's provided as a summary of verifiable information.
2437: 2032: 341:
may apply if the only available information was a dull list of technical, geographical or chronological data. And if the only information for the item were copies of press releases, that wouldn't be enough as those are
3472: 1739: 3412: 3159: 2780: 1417: 3482: 92:
Many similar items can have encyclopedic articles of their own; articles' content should describe which peculiarities distinguish one item from the others, based on critical commentary found in reliable sources.
3224: 1084: 421:(a.k.a. WP:COOKIE). WP:COOKIE is often used in AfDs against articles with reliable sources stating that they are "not different enough from its peers". These arguments are subjective and inconsistently applied. 3748: 3743: 3034: 3537: 1837: 3522: 3272: 1812: 622:
unless you have the exact article name. And for a reader who has the exact name of what she's looking for, chances are that will be better served by a small encyclopedic article than by a blank page.
1867: 1564: 460:
for deletion based on lack of notability: if several experts have expressed professional judgement, there's no support for editors to assert lack of notability based only on the available sources.
3835: 3542: 2949: 2135: 1589: 1512: 1094: 1714: 1144: 1134: 2989: 2969: 1932: 1902: 1214: 531:
Allowing this small bits of valuable information would help in compiling enough information about that class of items, which would otherwise be lost if each individual article was deleted.
2226: 1952: 1229: 1169: 1302: 3687: 1634: 237:
In summary: keep the article as a stub if someone else has cared to write about it; merge to a group article on the same topic if all the verifiable content is from primary references.
2994: 511:, would be an invaluable resource beyond what can be achieved with a single article for the whole class or comparison table for items. This is the reason why almanacs exist, after all. 527:
It is not our policy to expect immaculate accounts of a wide topic to spring forth fully formed. Deletion does not assist in such cases because it destroys the details as they appear.
139:.... An encyclopedic treatment of these items is difficult, but not impossible. Articles should strive to report what is unique and most significant about each instance of the class. 3074: 3029: 2939: 2889: 2155: 1882: 1857: 3796: 3582: 1872: 1507: 1492: 1204: 2909: 1472: 3064: 2979: 2095: 1947: 1852: 1467: 1427: 1282: 3692: 2785: 2698: 2296: 2037: 1862: 1787: 1522: 1497: 1422: 1034: 993: 2673: 2618: 2603: 3119: 3069: 2924: 2216: 1554: 1437: 1317: 2356: 1734: 3652: 2281: 2027: 1764: 1689: 1259: 2336: 3547: 3199: 3044: 2964: 2633: 2382: 2311: 2165: 1462: 276:
stands out among the class of other similar items. If the sources are not significant enough to establish notability, the content could still be merged with proper
3592: 3149: 1847: 1724: 1614: 1517: 1502: 1729: 1104: 231: 3134: 3104: 2914: 2663: 2658: 2195: 1644: 1599: 1529: 3672: 2351: 3830: 3447: 1892: 1267: 981: 3532: 1249: 3402: 3277: 1297: 3164: 2879: 2276: 1962: 1744: 1574: 1487: 1089: 2022: 1239: 250: 3753: 3054: 3014: 2728: 2341: 2261: 1777: 1679: 1609: 1397: 392:
that should be used. Editors are expected to state arguments for their preferred outcome and explain how those arguments apply to the particular content.
3642: 3214: 2397: 2894: 2331: 2077: 1569: 1109: 2693: 2638: 2608: 1079: 409:, the deletion discussion should still take into account the possibility to keep the verifiable content in a related article in which it is relevant. 272:
Editorial judgment should be exerted when evaluating the significance that critical commentary provides; coverage should provide the reasons why this
3362: 3282: 2145: 607:
So? Knowledge (XXG) is not paper, so there's room for those. And having them treated and categorized in an encyclopedic way would be highly valuable.
234:). If there is enough commentary to write a meaningful Reception or Analysis section, keep the article and write the section if it's not yet there. 3677: 3647: 3437: 3417: 2974: 2643: 2598: 2593: 2402: 2286: 2190: 1927: 1639: 1584: 1539: 1477: 1447: 1352: 1342: 1114: 3457: 2959: 1559: 1244: 3612: 3487: 3337: 3059: 2755: 2563: 2442: 2291: 1887: 1709: 1659: 1199: 500:
Common sense tells us that each stand-alone article may not provide much information on its own beyond what a list of links to reviews would do;
3627: 3567: 3492: 2984: 2874: 2703: 1674: 1664: 1629: 1442: 1347: 1069: 3667: 913: 3637: 3502: 3477: 3357: 3129: 2588: 2497: 2457: 2361: 2017: 2002: 1877: 1482: 1332: 1287: 1219: 1179: 1029: 43:
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Knowledge (XXG) contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of
3779: 3607: 3587: 3512: 3507: 3079: 2568: 2211: 2120: 1982: 1917: 1827: 1817: 1792: 1754: 1749: 1684: 1452: 1412: 1357: 44: 2065: 2683: 2346: 2175: 3801: 3204: 2492: 2477: 2392: 1967: 1312: 1059: 1054: 142:
Creating unique snowflakes is done by trimming biographical details and technical or statistical tables to the minimum, and creating a
3597: 3407: 3377: 3342: 3169: 2648: 2558: 2472: 2115: 2085: 1957: 1139: 1234: 3763: 3632: 3462: 3189: 3089: 2899: 2775: 2688: 2653: 2578: 2548: 2412: 2246: 2236: 2185: 2012: 1997: 1922: 1694: 1544: 1387: 1174: 1119: 1044: 974: 940:
Create a primary article containing several X if "a collection of X" is a notable topic on its own as covered by reliable sources.
909:
Sometimes, lots of small articles tied together by a navigation list or category will be the best structure, sometimes it won't.
150:
section with the most juicy bits of the professional critical reviews; taking both actions would achieve an encyclopedic article.
2678: 2573: 2538: 1367: 3738: 3552: 3467: 3229: 3174: 3094: 3049: 3004: 2999: 2884: 2718: 2513: 2221: 2042: 1822: 1797: 1704: 1699: 1579: 1209: 1124: 1039: 287: 199: 3733: 2929: 2613: 425:
This has caused inconsistent coverage of individual consumer articles, primarily in electronics (where online coverage is wide)
124: 3789: 3562: 3442: 3322: 3297: 3124: 2760: 2723: 2713: 2316: 2256: 2110: 1407: 1382: 1337: 1189: 1164: 1154: 1129: 832: 828: 824: 774:
Lots of small, single-item articles are compatible with the Knowledge (XXG) pillars and guidelines. The "online encyclopedia"
347: 190:
The major criterion to distinguish "snowflake" unique content from run-of-the-mill content is the "critical commentary" test:
128: 3682: 3497: 3382: 3307: 3194: 3114: 3084: 2934: 2553: 2523: 2487: 2377: 2241: 2160: 1942: 1807: 1772: 1619: 1377: 1327: 1322: 1049: 266: 2105: 1292: 318:
is an essay and thus not a "consensual policy that editors should normally follow". The bar for inclusion with respect to
132: 3784: 3372: 3367: 3327: 3312: 3302: 3179: 3024: 2432: 2422: 2321: 2130: 1992: 1277: 1149: 811:
Even when single stubs are too small to be kept, they can be merged in a catch-all article covering a common topic. From
211: 3758: 3715: 3527: 3392: 3292: 3252: 3209: 3154: 3144: 3139: 3109: 2944: 2919: 2904: 2859: 2745: 2467: 2407: 2140: 1977: 1912: 1907: 1897: 1649: 1272: 1024: 1006: 967: 311: 107: 746: 474:
Of course the value judgments included this way should be attributed to the source in the article, not stated as fact.
3432: 3387: 2750: 2623: 2583: 2387: 2125: 1654: 1099: 892: 299: 290:
fact-checking should be preferred, for there is the possibility that professional reviewers can be influenced by the
346:. But as long as the item has been subject to critical review, that's enough to establish notability. Compare with 202:
critics? If several reliable sources have done so, that's enough basis for the presumption of notability given per
3662: 3602: 3577: 3517: 3427: 3422: 3009: 2826: 2528: 2518: 2306: 2301: 1719: 1392: 1362: 1194: 406: 215: 3622: 3572: 3352: 3347: 3317: 2806: 2770: 2765: 2462: 2266: 2100: 1624: 1457: 1432: 1307: 860: 775: 396: 381: 377: 257:
favor events and items that have a significant lasting effect or widespread impact, and discourages those with
3617: 3184: 3039: 2452: 2447: 2231: 2150: 2007: 1669: 692:- technical product that has appeared at several hands-on review articles (not mere technical specifications). 579: 546:
professional reviewers (of electronics, restaurants, travel guides...) do routinely write this kind of content
385: 343: 102: 1074: 601:
If we apply the criteria of WP:N in its strictest sense we could add thousands of electronic consumer items.
3557: 3019: 2816: 2740: 1604: 1549: 1534: 1064: 884: 812: 467: 389: 338: 319: 219: 36: 859:
section this should be enough to create a differentiated "snowflake" article that summarizes how the item
603: 529: 227: 3657: 3267: 2836: 2811: 2790: 2170: 1802: 1594: 1159: 848: 373: 48: 943:
Create separate articles for each single X item that has enough reliable sources directly addressing it.
916:
wouldn't work as a single article because each restaurant in it is notable, but the topic itself is not.
2831: 2821: 2735: 2708: 1972: 1224: 888: 586: 494: 486: 354: 223: 166: 136: 58: 490: 3287: 2251: 2090: 1987: 1184: 582:, but not when the article already contains enough solid references, as notability is not temporary. 553: 522: 291: 262: 258: 254: 2427: 2417: 2326: 990: 836: 418: 32: 739: 717: 2180: 358: 246: 525:
Deleting imperfect content goes against the Knowledge (XXG) process to achieve great articles.
3452: 3397: 2543: 2482: 1782: 856: 759: 222:
is up to the editors to assess, but if the subject is not notable then the reviews should be
210:
This criterion recognizes that value judgements from professional critics and journalists at
115: 920: 738:
A school — using statistics regarding dropout rates, countrywide standardized test results,
875: 633: 457: 453: 401: 369: 283: 277: 203: 946:
If you have both primary and individual articles, link to each individual article with a
852: 883:
If the ONLY information available in reliable sources is that of the types described in
672: 732:, and/or leaders are unique, notable and well-attested in the media and/or literature. 645: 430: 3824: 3333:
Assume that everyone's assuming good faith, assuming that you are assuming good faith
950: 696: 295: 929:
big list, major items can be latter forked into stand-alone articles of their own. (
261:(professional content that doesn't provide enough context for the topic) or without 51:. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints. 779: 376:
for the proper course of action to take on the current article's content. Several "
900:
This essay doesn't apply to BLP as they have a special treatment under WP policy.
685:
An artist whose work has been directly reviewed at several specialized magazines.
678:
A street for which several independent reporters have created in-depth articles.
433:, unless a particular class has an additional consensual guideline (i.e. books). 817:
Merged groups of small articles based on a core topic are certainly permitted.
778:
states that Knowledge (XXG) "incorporates elements of general and specialized
671:
A low-budget, independent film that has achieved bad reviews, but acquired a
787: 703: 2534:
Don't accuse someone of a personal attack for accusing of a personal attack
855:
reviewers. If there are enough of these sources to write a comprehensive,
322:
is significant coverage from third party reliable sources; arguments that
725: 566:
the topic is an electronic device marketed only for a few months or years
198:(i.e. information other than a routine description of its properties) by 195: 194:
Has the item merited comments that suppose a value judgment or elaborate
505:
well cross-referenced collection of articles for items in the same class
959: 783: 667:
Some articles that can be created with enough reliable sources can be:
509:
addressing the salient characteristics of each item in encyclopedic way
1938:
Don't overuse shortcuts to policy and guidelines to win your argument
721: 710: 689: 3220:
Knowledge (XXG) is not here to tell the world about your noble cause
905:
Choice between linked snowflake articles vs primary article on topic
417:
This essay is explicitly shaped to address some of the arguments at
729: 632: 573:
we should wait until this gets traction and more sources report it
101: 1403:
Criticisms of society may be consistent with NPOV and reliability
895:, the article can't be put in context and will not be admissible. 617:
Lots of twisty little articles, all alike, are hard to navigate.
3713: 3250: 2857: 2063: 1004: 963: 956:
template from the corresponding section of the primary article.
640: 78: 18: 760:
Knowledge (XXG):MILL § Dealing with a run-of-the-mill article
742:
exam pass rates, university acceptance rates, and other data.
637:
Every snowflake has something to offer, but are they noticed?
3100:
Not every single thing Donald Trump does deserves an article
2272:
Most people who disagree with you on content are not vandals
1740:
Knowledge (XXG) is not being written in an organized fashion
497:(and the bigger it is, the better chance to survive hell). 120:
a distilled compilation of the elements that distinguish it
2629:
Don't demand that editors solve the problems they identify
2438:
Drop the stick and back slowly away from the horse carcass
2033:
What to do if your article gets tagged for speedy deletion
1373:
Children's lit, adult new readers, & large-print books
1085:
Editing Knowledge (XXG) is like visiting a foreign country
388:
have emerged placing emphasis on different aspects of the
286:
is also relevant here. Review sites with a reputation for
544:. A common reply against the SNOWFLAKE criterion is that 3473:
How many Wikipedians does it take to change a lightbulb?
3483:
How to put up a straight pole by pushing it at an angle
930: 657: 536:
Reasons against snowflake articles, and their rebuttals
181: 174: 66: 3836:
Knowledge (XXG) essays about building the encyclopedia
3035:
No amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability
2669:
Don't make a smarmy valediction part of your signature
314:
justification against an article with references, but
2781:
There's no need to guess someone's preferred pronouns
1418:
Don't demolish the house while it's still being built
3225:
Knowledge (XXG) is not the place to post your résumé
218:. Whether enough of them are available to establish 3772: 3726: 2799: 2506: 2370: 2204: 2076: 1836: 1763: 1258: 1017: 808:- not only general public information can be added. 3744:Difference between policies, guidelines and essays 3523:Newcomers are delicious, so go ahead and bite them 1145:Not editing because of Knowledge (XXG) restriction 333:This essay is not completely against the ideas in 1715:Understanding Knowledge (XXG)'s content standards 1007:Essays on building, editing, and deleting content 372:(AfD) discussions are where editors try to build 1868:Arguments to avoid in image deletion discussions 1813:We shouldn't be able to figure out your opinions 1565:Not every story/event/disaster needs a biography 706:that received particular attention from critics. 456:list by giving a clear criterion for one of the 3543:No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man 3273:Ain't no rules says a dog can't play basketball 2950:Drafts are not checked for notability or sanity 1590:Organizing disambiguation pages by subject area 1095:Eight simple rules for editing our encyclopedia 485:An added value of this policy is that it helps 452:. Following this guideline would alleviate the 330:can't stand against well-established sources. 2970:Extracting the meaning of significant coverage 2136:High-functioning autism and Asperger's editors 1903:Counting and sorting are not original research 924:common notable information can be centralized. 3797:How to contribute to Knowledge (XXG) guidance 3413:Don't abbreviate "Knowledge (XXG)" as "Wiki"! 1933:Don't confuse stub status with non-notability 1215:The role of policies in collaborative anarchy 975: 8: 3463:Seven Ages of Editor, by Will E. Spear-Shake 2227:An uncivil environment is a poor environment 1953:How to save an article proposed for deletion 1230:We are absolutely here to right great wrongs 1205:Ten Simple Rules for Editing Knowledge (XXG) 1170:POV and OR from editors, sources, and fields 471:not all the data but the valuable insights. 137:obscure branches of popular culture subjects 2995:Inclusion is not an indicator of notability 355:Knowledge (XXG) is not a paper encyclopedia 3723: 3710: 3688:You don't have to be mad to work here, but 3260: 3247: 3075:Notability is not relevance or reliability 3030:News coverage does not decrease notability 2940:Discriminate vs indiscriminate information 2890:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 2867: 2854: 2073: 2060: 1883:Before commenting in a deletion discussion 1858:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 1014: 1001: 982: 968: 960: 310:Arguments for deletion frequently use the 3583:Please be a giant dick, so we can ban you 1873:Arguments to make in deletion discussions 1493:Identifying and using independent sources 861:influenced the world when it was released 847:(i.e. nontrivial) commentary stating the 3749:Don't cite essays as if they were policy 2910:Big events make key participants notable 2357:Knowledge (XXG) should not be a monopoly 1735:Knowledge (XXG) is not a reliable source 1473:Formatting bilateral relations templates 745:A hospital — using statistics regarding 45:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies or guidelines 3831:Knowledge (XXG) essays about notability 3160:Solutions are mixtures and nothing else 3065:Notability is not a level playing field 2980:How the presumption of notability works 2096:Contributing to complicated discussions 1948:How the presumption of notability works 1468:Formatting bilateral relations articles 1283:Adding images improves the encyclopedia 3693:You should not write meaningless lists 2990:Historical/Policy/Notability/Arguments 2297:Staying cool when the editing gets hot 2038:When in doubt, hide it in the woodwork 1863:Arguments to avoid in deletion reviews 1428:Don't hope the house will build itself 1035:All Five Pillars are equally important 697:video game receiving (brief) appraisal 413:Problems with run-of-the-mill criteria 328:review sites cannot provide notability 226:into another relevant article to help 3120:One sentence does not an article make 3070:Notability is not a matter of opinion 2786:You can't squeeze blood from a turnip 2699:Don't throw your toys out of the pram 2217:A weak personal attack is still wrong 2156:Obsessive–compulsive disorder editors 1788:Don't throw more litter onto the pile 1730:Knowledge (XXG) is a work in progress 1555:Minors and persons judged incompetent 1318:An unfinished house is a real problem 1303:Alternatives to the "Expand" template 1105:External criticism of Knowledge (XXG) 914:Category:Restaurants in New York City 7: 3673:What Knowledge (XXG) is not/Outtakes 3653:Things that should not be surprising 3348:Bad Jokes and Other Deleted Nonsense 2674:Don't remind others of past misdeeds 2619:Don't come down like a ton of bricks 2604:Don't call people by their real name 2352:Knowledge (XXG) is not about winning 2282:Profanity, civility, and discussions 1690:There are no shortcuts to neutrality 749:, hospital rankings, and other data. 585:This is also not a solid defense as 359:article for a class of similar items 3548:No one cares about your garage band 3533:List of jokes about Knowledge (XXG) 3200:What is and is not routine coverage 3045:No one cares about your garage band 2965:Existence does not prove notability 2383:Assume the assumption of good faith 2312:There is no Divine Right of Editors 2166:Relationships with academic editors 2028:Why was the page I created deleted? 2023:Knowledge (XXG) is not Whack-A-Mole 1463:Featured articles may have problems 1250:Knowledge (XXG) is not RationalWiki 438:Advantages of following this advice 407:too few information even for a stub 118:items, where each article contains 3593:Please do not murder the newcomers 3150:Reducing consensus to an algorithm 2634:Don't drink the consensus Kool-Aid 1848:Adjectives in your recommendations 1725:What an article should not include 1615:The problem with elegant variation 1423:Don't get hung up on minor details 1240:Knowledge (XXG) is an encyclopedia 813:Knowledge (XXG) is not a directory 339:Knowledge (XXG) is not a directory 251:Knowledge (XXG) is not a newspaper 245:Knowledge (XXG) is concerned with 49:thoroughly vetted by the community 14: 3643:The first rule of Knowledge (XXG) 3215:Knowledge (XXG) is not Crunchbase 2915:Businesses with a single location 2196:You have a right to remain silent 1645:Restoring part of a reverted edit 1600:Potential, not just current state 1530:Ignore STRONGNAT for date formats 110:, but each one has its own allure 2664:Don't knit beside the guillotine 2659:Don't ignore community consensus 1893:Confusing arguments mean nothing 754:How to handle Snowflake articles 644: 82: 22: 16:Essay on editing Knowledge (XXG) 3165:Sources must be out-of-universe 2880:All high schools can be notable 2277:Old-fashioned Wikipedian values 1963:Identifying blatant advertising 1745:The world will not end tomorrow 1575:Not everything needs a template 1488:How to write a featured article 1090:Editors will sometimes be wrong 931:See an explanatory example here 735:A mayor of a medium-sized city. 395:This essay is aligned with the 324:the item has nothing innovative 114:A collection of articles about 95:Focus on quality, not quantity. 3754:Avoid writing redundant essays 3403:Don't stuff beans up your nose 3278:Akin's Laws of Article Writing 3105:Obscurity ≠ Lack of notability 3055:Notability cannot be purchased 3015:Masking the lack of notability 1778:Copyediting reception sections 1680:Temporary versions of articles 1610:Principle of Some Astonishment 1398:Creating controversial content 1298:Akin's Laws of Article Writing 1245:Knowledge (XXG) is a community 629:Examples of snowflake articles 493:: lots of snowflakes create a 1: 3780:About policies and guidelines 2895:Articles with a single source 2519:Knowledge (XXG):Because I can 2342:Two wrongs don't make a right 2332:The rules of polite discourse 2262:It's not the end of the world 1570:Not everything needs a navbox 1438:Don't "teach the controversy" 1110:Here to build an encyclopedia 348:Notability criteria for books 3668:Knowledge (XXG) is an MMORPG 3363:BOLD, revert, revert, revert 3283:Alternatives to edit warring 2146:Maintaining a friendly space 747:hospital-acquired infections 3648:The Five Pillars of Untruth 3438:Editing under the influence 2975:Google searches and numbers 2694:Don't template the regulars 2609:Don't call the kettle black 2403:Be excellent to one another 2287:Revert notification opt-out 2191:We are all Wikipedians here 1640:Put a little effort into it 1585:Obtain peer review comments 1540:Introduction to structurism 1478:Fruit of the poisonous tree 1448:Editors are not mindreaders 1353:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle 1343:Beef up that first revision 1115:Leave it to the experienced 1080:Don't search for objections 3852: 3678:Why not create an account? 3613:Requirements for adminship 3488:How to vandalize correctly 3458:Five Fs of Knowledge (XXG) 3418:Don't delete the main page 3338:Avoid using preview button 3060:Notability comparison test 2644:Don't fight fire with fire 2639:Don't eat the troll's food 2599:Don't call a spade a spade 2594:Don't bludgeon the process 2443:Encourage full discussions 2292:Shadowless Fists of Death! 1928:Don't attack the nominator 1888:But there must be sources! 1710:Try not to leave it a stub 1660:Source your plot summaries 885:Knowledge (XXG):NOTCATALOG 757: 554:place each item in context 164: 157: 56: 3722: 3709: 3628:Sarcasm is really helpful 3568:Notability is not eternal 3493:How to win a citation war 3263: 3259: 3246: 2955:Every snowflake is unique 2875:Advanced source searching 2870: 2866: 2853: 2756:No, you can't have a pony 2704:Do not insult the vandals 2564:Don't be high-maintenance 2121:Encouraging the newcomers 2072: 2059: 1665:Specialized-style fallacy 1630:Pruning article revisions 1458:Endorsements (commercial) 1443:Editing on mobile devices 1348:Blind men and an elephant 1323:Articles have a half-life 1070:Dissent is not disloyalty 1040:Avoid vague introductions 1013: 1000: 230:of the encyclopedia (and 3638:The Night Before Wikimas 3503:Ignore every single rule 3478:How to get away with UPE 3358:Before they were notable 3130:Overreliance upon Google 2925:Common sourcing mistakes 2498:Settle the process first 2458:Imagine others complexly 2362:Writing for the opponent 2337:There is no common sense 2018:Unopposed AFD discussion 2003:Relisting can be abusive 1878:Avoid repeated arguments 1483:Give an article a chance 1333:Avoid mission statements 1293:Advanced text formatting 1288:Advanced article editing 1235:Knowledge (XXG) in brief 1220:The rules are principles 1180:Product, process, policy 1030:Articles must be written 713:of a major denomination. 159: 90:This page in a nutshell: 3773:Policies and guidelines 3608:Requests for medication 3588:Please bite the newbies 3513:Mess with the templates 3080:Notability means impact 2614:Don't call things cruft 2589:Don't be the Fun Police 2398:Avoid the word "vandal" 2347:Knowledge (XXG) clichés 2212:A thank you never hurts 1983:Liar liar pants on fire 1918:Deletion is not cleanup 1828:Writing better articles 1818:Write the article first 1793:Gender-neutral language 1765:Writing article content 1755:Writing better articles 1750:Write the article first 1685:Tertiary-source fallacy 1453:Encourage the newcomers 1413:Dictionaries as sources 1358:Build content to endure 823:Media products such as 702:A special episode of a 699:from several reviewers. 294:of information through 3802:Policy writing is hard 3508:Is that even an essay? 3205:What notability is not 2960:Existence ≠ Notability 2569:Don't be inconsiderate 2493:Read before commenting 2478:Mind your own business 2393:Avoid personal remarks 1968:Identifying test edits 1313:A navbox on every page 1268:100K featured articles 1065:Concede lost arguments 1060:Competence is required 991:Knowledge (XXG) essays 638: 571:Editors may say that " 280:into another article. 228:continuous improvement 214:meet the criteria for 208: 125:Hollywood blockbusters 111: 3598:Pledge of Tranquility 3343:Avoid using wikilinks 3170:Subjective importance 2684:Don't spite your face 2473:Keep it down to earth 2237:Beware of the tigers! 2176:Too long; didn't read 2116:Edit at your own pace 2086:Accepting other users 1853:AfD is not a war zone 1200:There is no seniority 1140:Neutrality of sources 936:As general criteria: 636: 370:Articles for deletion 204:notability guidelines 192: 158:Please read also the 129:direct-to-video films 105: 47:, as it has not been 3764:Quote your own essay 3633:Sausages for tasting 3408:Don't-give-a-fuckism 3378:CaPiTaLiZaTiOn MuCh? 3190:Vanispamcruftisement 3090:Notability sub-pages 2900:Avoid template creep 2860:Essays on notability 2776:There are no oracles 2559:Don't be a WikiBigot 2413:Call a spade a spade 2186:Unblock perspectives 2013:The Heymann Standard 1998:Overzealous deletion 1958:I just don't like it 1695:There is no deadline 1560:"Murder of" articles 1388:Common-style fallacy 1260:Article construction 1175:Process is important 1120:Levels of competence 1045:Be a reliable source 491:Unity makes strength 284:Conflict of interest 133:fictional characters 3553:No one really cares 3468:Go ahead, vandalize 3230:Two prongs of merit 3175:Third-party sources 3095:Notabilitymandering 3050:No one really cares 3005:Inherent notability 3000:Independent sources 2885:Alternative outlets 2719:Nationalist editing 2689:Don't take the bait 2654:Don't help too much 2579:Don't be prejudiced 2549:Don't be an ostrich 2514:ALPHABETTISPAGHETTI 2247:Deletion as revenge 2222:Advice for hotheads 2043:No Encyclopedic Use 1923:Does deletion help? 1823:Writing about women 1705:The deadline is now 1700:There is a deadline 1580:Nothing is in stone 1210:Tendentious editing 1125:Levels of consensus 919:On the other hand, 868:What NOT to include 849:attributed opinions 843:section containing 799:tabular information 247:enduring notability 3563:No sorcery threats 3443:Embrace Stop Signs 3323:Assume good wraith 3298:Anti-Wikipedianism 3135:Perennial websites 3125:Other stuff exists 2761:Passive aggression 2724:No angry mastodons 2714:Hate is disruptive 2574:Don't be obnoxious 2539:Don't be a fanatic 2317:Most ideas are bad 2257:Forgive and forget 2066:Essays on civility 1675:Run an edit-a-thon 1408:Deprecated sources 1383:Citation underkill 1368:Chesterton's fence 1338:Be neutral in form 1190:Reasonability rule 1155:Oversimplification 1130:Most ideas are bad 839:usually contain a 740:Advanced Placement 718:independent church 656:. You can help by 639: 578:This is valid per 267:continued coverage 255:inclusion criteria 154:Proposed criterion 112: 3818: 3817: 3814: 3813: 3810: 3809: 3705: 3704: 3701: 3700: 3683:Yes legal threats 3498:Ignore all essays 3383:Complete bollocks 3308:Asshole John rule 3242: 3241: 3238: 3237: 3195:What BLP1E is not 3115:One hundred words 3085:Notability points 2849: 2848: 2845: 2844: 2649:Don't give a fuck 2524:Civil POV pushing 2488:Mutual withdrawal 2378:Assume good faith 2242:Civility warnings 2161:Please say please 2111:Editors' pronouns 2055: 2054: 2051: 2050: 1943:Follow the leader 1808:Use our own words 1773:Avoid thread mode 1620:Pro and con lists 1378:Citation overkill 1328:Autosizing images 1050:Civil POV pushing 893:WP:NOTADVERTISING 673:dedicated fanbase 665: 664: 108:all look the same 100: 99: 77: 76: 3843: 3759:Finding an essay 3724: 3711: 3373:Butterfly effect 3368:Boston Tea Party 3328:Assume stupidity 3313:Assume bad faith 3303:Articlecountitis 3261: 3248: 3180:Trivial mentions 3025:Minimum coverage 2868: 2855: 2554:Don't be ashamed 2433:Discussing cruft 2423:Deny recognition 2322:Nothing is clear 2131:Expect no thanks 2074: 2061: 1993:Nothing is clear 1840:deleting content 1523:Tertiary sources 1278:Acronym overkill 1150:The one question 1015: 1002: 995: 984: 977: 970: 961: 955: 949: 921:ARM architecture 648: 641: 489:content because 259:routine coverage 212:reliable sources 184: 177: 86: 85: 79: 69: 26: 25: 19: 3851: 3850: 3846: 3845: 3844: 3842: 3841: 3840: 3821: 3820: 3819: 3806: 3768: 3739:Value of essays 3718: 3697: 3528:Legal vandalism 3393:Counting juntas 3293:Anti-Wikipedian 3255: 3253:Humorous essays 3234: 3210:What to include 3155:Run-of-the-mill 3145:Read the source 3110:Offline sources 2905:Bare notability 2862: 2841: 2795: 2746:No Confederates 2544:Don't be a jerk 2502: 2468:Keep it concise 2408:Beyond civility 2366: 2200: 2141:How to be civil 2106:Don't retaliate 2068: 2047: 1978:Keep it concise 1913:Delete the junk 1908:Delete or merge 1898:Content removal 1832: 1798:Myth vs fiction 1759: 1650:Robotic editing 1513:Science sources 1508:Primary sources 1498:History sources 1273:Abandoned stubs 1254: 1025:Article content 1009: 996: 988: 953: 947: 907: 870: 767: 765:What to include 762: 756: 661: 654:needs expansion 631: 587:WP is not paper 538: 507:, each of them 440: 419:Run-of-the-mill 415: 382:WP:Inclusionism 367: 365:AfD discussions 335:run-of-the-mill 316:Run-of-the-mill 312:Run-of-the-mill 308: 292:original source 269:in reporting. 243: 232:keep it growing 188: 187: 180: 175:WP:PROFESSIONAL 173: 169: 163: 156: 83: 73: 72: 65: 61: 53: 52: 23: 17: 12: 11: 5: 3849: 3847: 3839: 3838: 3833: 3823: 3822: 3816: 3815: 3812: 3811: 3808: 3807: 3805: 3804: 3799: 3794: 3793: 3792: 3787: 3776: 3774: 3770: 3769: 3767: 3766: 3761: 3756: 3751: 3746: 3741: 3736: 3730: 3728: 3720: 3719: 3714: 3707: 3706: 3703: 3702: 3699: 3698: 3696: 3695: 3690: 3685: 3680: 3675: 3670: 3665: 3660: 3655: 3650: 3645: 3640: 3635: 3630: 3625: 3620: 3615: 3610: 3605: 3600: 3595: 3590: 3585: 3580: 3575: 3570: 3565: 3560: 3555: 3550: 3545: 3540: 3535: 3530: 3525: 3520: 3515: 3510: 3505: 3500: 3495: 3490: 3485: 3480: 3475: 3470: 3465: 3460: 3455: 3450: 3445: 3440: 3435: 3433:Editsummarisis 3430: 3425: 3420: 3415: 3410: 3405: 3400: 3395: 3390: 3388:Counting forks 3385: 3380: 3375: 3370: 3365: 3360: 3355: 3350: 3345: 3340: 3335: 3330: 3325: 3320: 3315: 3310: 3305: 3300: 3295: 3290: 3285: 3280: 3275: 3270: 3264: 3257: 3256: 3251: 3244: 3243: 3240: 3239: 3236: 3235: 3233: 3232: 3227: 3222: 3217: 3212: 3207: 3202: 3197: 3192: 3187: 3182: 3177: 3172: 3167: 3162: 3157: 3152: 3147: 3142: 3137: 3132: 3127: 3122: 3117: 3112: 3107: 3102: 3097: 3092: 3087: 3082: 3077: 3072: 3067: 3062: 3057: 3052: 3047: 3042: 3037: 3032: 3027: 3022: 3017: 3012: 3007: 3002: 2997: 2992: 2987: 2982: 2977: 2972: 2967: 2962: 2957: 2952: 2947: 2945:Don't cite GNG 2942: 2937: 2932: 2927: 2922: 2920:But it's true! 2917: 2912: 2907: 2902: 2897: 2892: 2887: 2882: 2877: 2871: 2864: 2863: 2858: 2851: 2850: 2847: 2846: 2843: 2842: 2840: 2839: 2834: 2829: 2824: 2819: 2817:WikiHarassment 2814: 2809: 2803: 2801: 2797: 2796: 2794: 2793: 2788: 2783: 2778: 2773: 2768: 2763: 2758: 2753: 2751:No queerphobia 2748: 2743: 2738: 2733: 2732: 2731: 2721: 2716: 2711: 2706: 2701: 2696: 2691: 2686: 2681: 2676: 2671: 2666: 2661: 2656: 2651: 2646: 2641: 2636: 2631: 2626: 2621: 2616: 2611: 2606: 2601: 2596: 2591: 2586: 2581: 2576: 2571: 2566: 2561: 2556: 2551: 2546: 2541: 2536: 2531: 2526: 2521: 2516: 2510: 2508: 2504: 2503: 2501: 2500: 2495: 2490: 2485: 2480: 2475: 2470: 2465: 2460: 2455: 2450: 2445: 2440: 2435: 2430: 2425: 2420: 2415: 2410: 2405: 2400: 2395: 2390: 2388:Assume no clue 2385: 2380: 2374: 2372: 2368: 2367: 2365: 2364: 2359: 2354: 2349: 2344: 2339: 2334: 2329: 2324: 2319: 2314: 2309: 2304: 2299: 2294: 2289: 2284: 2279: 2274: 2269: 2264: 2259: 2254: 2249: 2244: 2239: 2234: 2229: 2224: 2219: 2214: 2208: 2206: 2202: 2201: 2199: 2198: 2193: 2188: 2183: 2178: 2173: 2168: 2163: 2158: 2153: 2148: 2143: 2138: 2133: 2128: 2126:Enjoy yourself 2123: 2118: 2113: 2108: 2103: 2098: 2093: 2088: 2082: 2080: 2070: 2069: 2064: 2057: 2056: 2053: 2052: 2049: 2048: 2046: 2045: 2040: 2035: 2030: 2025: 2020: 2015: 2010: 2005: 2000: 1995: 1990: 1985: 1980: 1975: 1970: 1965: 1960: 1955: 1950: 1945: 1940: 1935: 1930: 1925: 1920: 1915: 1910: 1905: 1900: 1895: 1890: 1885: 1880: 1875: 1870: 1865: 1860: 1855: 1850: 1844: 1842: 1839: 1834: 1833: 1831: 1830: 1825: 1820: 1815: 1810: 1805: 1800: 1795: 1790: 1785: 1780: 1775: 1769: 1767: 1761: 1760: 1758: 1757: 1752: 1747: 1742: 1737: 1732: 1727: 1722: 1717: 1712: 1707: 1702: 1697: 1692: 1687: 1682: 1677: 1672: 1667: 1662: 1657: 1655:Sham consensus 1652: 1647: 1642: 1637: 1632: 1627: 1622: 1617: 1612: 1607: 1602: 1597: 1592: 1587: 1582: 1577: 1572: 1567: 1562: 1557: 1552: 1547: 1542: 1537: 1532: 1527: 1526: 1525: 1520: 1515: 1510: 1505: 1500: 1490: 1485: 1480: 1475: 1470: 1465: 1460: 1455: 1450: 1445: 1440: 1435: 1430: 1425: 1420: 1415: 1410: 1405: 1400: 1395: 1390: 1385: 1380: 1375: 1370: 1365: 1360: 1355: 1350: 1345: 1340: 1335: 1330: 1325: 1320: 1315: 1310: 1305: 1300: 1295: 1290: 1285: 1280: 1275: 1270: 1264: 1262: 1256: 1255: 1253: 1252: 1247: 1242: 1237: 1232: 1227: 1222: 1217: 1212: 1207: 1202: 1197: 1192: 1187: 1182: 1177: 1172: 1167: 1162: 1157: 1152: 1147: 1142: 1137: 1132: 1127: 1122: 1117: 1112: 1107: 1102: 1100:Explanationism 1097: 1092: 1087: 1082: 1077: 1072: 1067: 1062: 1057: 1052: 1047: 1042: 1037: 1032: 1027: 1021: 1019: 1011: 1010: 1005: 998: 997: 989: 987: 986: 979: 972: 964: 958: 957: 944: 941: 926: 925: 917: 906: 903: 902: 901: 897: 896: 880: 879: 869: 866: 865: 864: 821: 820: 819: 809: 802: 766: 763: 755: 752: 751: 750: 743: 736: 733: 714: 707: 700: 693: 686: 683: 679: 676: 663: 662: 651: 649: 630: 627: 626: 625: 624: 623: 610: 609: 608: 594: 593: 592: 591: 590: 583: 580:wp:CRYSTALBALL 559: 558: 557: 537: 534: 533: 532: 515: 514: 513: 512: 501: 482: 481: 480: 479: 475: 461: 458:WP:DEL#REASONs 447: 439: 436: 435: 434: 426: 414: 411: 386:WP:Deletionism 366: 363: 344:self-published 307: 304: 296:press releases 242: 239: 186: 185: 178: 170: 165: 162:of this essay. 155: 152: 98: 97: 87: 75: 74: 71: 70: 62: 57: 54: 42: 41: 29: 27: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3848: 3837: 3834: 3832: 3829: 3828: 3826: 3803: 3800: 3798: 3795: 3791: 3788: 3786: 3783: 3782: 3781: 3778: 3777: 3775: 3771: 3765: 3762: 3760: 3757: 3755: 3752: 3750: 3747: 3745: 3742: 3740: 3737: 3735: 3732: 3731: 3729: 3725: 3721: 3717: 3712: 3708: 3694: 3691: 3689: 3686: 3684: 3681: 3679: 3676: 3674: 3671: 3669: 3666: 3664: 3663:Watchlistitis 3661: 3659: 3658:The WikiBible 3656: 3654: 3651: 3649: 3646: 3644: 3641: 3639: 3636: 3634: 3631: 3629: 3626: 3624: 3621: 3619: 3616: 3614: 3611: 3609: 3606: 3604: 3603:R-e-s-p-e-c-t 3601: 3599: 3596: 3594: 3591: 3589: 3586: 3584: 3581: 3579: 3578:Play the game 3576: 3574: 3571: 3569: 3566: 3564: 3561: 3559: 3556: 3554: 3551: 3549: 3546: 3544: 3541: 3539: 3536: 3534: 3531: 3529: 3526: 3524: 3521: 3519: 3518:My local pond 3516: 3514: 3511: 3509: 3506: 3504: 3501: 3499: 3496: 3494: 3491: 3489: 3486: 3484: 3481: 3479: 3476: 3474: 3471: 3469: 3466: 3464: 3461: 3459: 3456: 3454: 3451: 3449: 3446: 3444: 3441: 3439: 3436: 3434: 3431: 3429: 3428:Edits Per Day 3426: 3424: 3423:Editcountitis 3421: 3419: 3416: 3414: 3411: 3409: 3406: 3404: 3401: 3399: 3396: 3394: 3391: 3389: 3386: 3384: 3381: 3379: 3376: 3374: 3371: 3369: 3366: 3364: 3361: 3359: 3356: 3354: 3351: 3349: 3346: 3344: 3341: 3339: 3336: 3334: 3331: 3329: 3326: 3324: 3321: 3319: 3316: 3314: 3311: 3309: 3306: 3304: 3301: 3299: 3296: 3294: 3291: 3289: 3286: 3284: 3281: 3279: 3276: 3274: 3271: 3269: 3266: 3265: 3262: 3258: 3254: 3249: 3245: 3231: 3228: 3226: 3223: 3221: 3218: 3216: 3213: 3211: 3208: 3206: 3203: 3201: 3198: 3196: 3193: 3191: 3188: 3186: 3183: 3181: 3178: 3176: 3173: 3171: 3168: 3166: 3163: 3161: 3158: 3156: 3153: 3151: 3148: 3146: 3143: 3141: 3138: 3136: 3133: 3131: 3128: 3126: 3123: 3121: 3118: 3116: 3113: 3111: 3108: 3106: 3103: 3101: 3098: 3096: 3093: 3091: 3088: 3086: 3083: 3081: 3078: 3076: 3073: 3071: 3068: 3066: 3063: 3061: 3058: 3056: 3053: 3051: 3048: 3046: 3043: 3041: 3038: 3036: 3033: 3031: 3028: 3026: 3023: 3021: 3018: 3016: 3013: 3011: 3010:Insignificant 3008: 3006: 3003: 3001: 2998: 2996: 2993: 2991: 2988: 2986: 2983: 2981: 2978: 2976: 2973: 2971: 2968: 2966: 2963: 2961: 2958: 2956: 2953: 2951: 2948: 2946: 2943: 2941: 2938: 2936: 2933: 2931: 2928: 2926: 2923: 2921: 2918: 2916: 2913: 2911: 2908: 2906: 2903: 2901: 2898: 2896: 2893: 2891: 2888: 2886: 2883: 2881: 2878: 2876: 2873: 2872: 2869: 2865: 2861: 2856: 2852: 2838: 2835: 2833: 2830: 2828: 2827:WikiLawyering 2825: 2823: 2820: 2818: 2815: 2813: 2810: 2808: 2805: 2804: 2802: 2800:WikiRelations 2798: 2792: 2789: 2787: 2784: 2782: 2779: 2777: 2774: 2772: 2769: 2767: 2764: 2762: 2759: 2757: 2754: 2752: 2749: 2747: 2744: 2742: 2739: 2737: 2734: 2730: 2727: 2726: 2725: 2722: 2720: 2717: 2715: 2712: 2710: 2707: 2705: 2702: 2700: 2697: 2695: 2692: 2690: 2687: 2685: 2682: 2680: 2677: 2675: 2672: 2670: 2667: 2665: 2662: 2660: 2657: 2655: 2652: 2650: 2647: 2645: 2642: 2640: 2637: 2635: 2632: 2630: 2627: 2625: 2624:Don't cry COI 2622: 2620: 2617: 2615: 2612: 2610: 2607: 2605: 2602: 2600: 2597: 2595: 2592: 2590: 2587: 2585: 2584:Don't be rude 2582: 2580: 2577: 2575: 2572: 2570: 2567: 2565: 2562: 2560: 2557: 2555: 2552: 2550: 2547: 2545: 2542: 2540: 2537: 2535: 2532: 2530: 2529:Cyberbullying 2527: 2525: 2522: 2520: 2517: 2515: 2512: 2511: 2509: 2505: 2499: 2496: 2494: 2491: 2489: 2486: 2484: 2481: 2479: 2476: 2474: 2471: 2469: 2466: 2464: 2461: 2459: 2456: 2454: 2451: 2449: 2446: 2444: 2441: 2439: 2436: 2434: 2431: 2429: 2426: 2424: 2421: 2419: 2416: 2414: 2411: 2409: 2406: 2404: 2401: 2399: 2396: 2394: 2391: 2389: 2386: 2384: 2381: 2379: 2376: 2375: 2373: 2369: 2363: 2360: 2358: 2355: 2353: 2350: 2348: 2345: 2343: 2340: 2338: 2335: 2333: 2330: 2328: 2325: 2323: 2320: 2318: 2315: 2313: 2310: 2308: 2307:The last word 2305: 2303: 2302:The grey zone 2300: 2298: 2295: 2293: 2290: 2288: 2285: 2283: 2280: 2278: 2275: 2273: 2270: 2268: 2265: 2263: 2260: 2258: 2255: 2253: 2250: 2248: 2245: 2243: 2240: 2238: 2235: 2233: 2230: 2228: 2225: 2223: 2220: 2218: 2215: 2213: 2210: 2209: 2207: 2203: 2197: 2194: 2192: 2189: 2187: 2184: 2182: 2179: 2177: 2174: 2172: 2169: 2167: 2164: 2162: 2159: 2157: 2154: 2152: 2149: 2147: 2144: 2142: 2139: 2137: 2134: 2132: 2129: 2127: 2124: 2122: 2119: 2117: 2114: 2112: 2109: 2107: 2104: 2102: 2099: 2097: 2094: 2092: 2089: 2087: 2084: 2083: 2081: 2079: 2075: 2071: 2067: 2062: 2058: 2044: 2041: 2039: 2036: 2034: 2031: 2029: 2026: 2024: 2021: 2019: 2016: 2014: 2011: 2009: 2006: 2004: 2001: 1999: 1996: 1994: 1991: 1989: 1986: 1984: 1981: 1979: 1976: 1974: 1971: 1969: 1966: 1964: 1961: 1959: 1956: 1954: 1951: 1949: 1946: 1944: 1941: 1939: 1936: 1934: 1931: 1929: 1926: 1924: 1921: 1919: 1916: 1914: 1911: 1909: 1906: 1904: 1901: 1899: 1896: 1894: 1891: 1889: 1886: 1884: 1881: 1879: 1876: 1874: 1871: 1869: 1866: 1864: 1861: 1859: 1856: 1854: 1851: 1849: 1846: 1845: 1843: 1841: 1835: 1829: 1826: 1824: 1821: 1819: 1816: 1814: 1811: 1809: 1806: 1804: 1801: 1799: 1796: 1794: 1791: 1789: 1786: 1784: 1781: 1779: 1776: 1774: 1771: 1770: 1768: 1766: 1762: 1756: 1753: 1751: 1748: 1746: 1743: 1741: 1738: 1736: 1733: 1731: 1728: 1726: 1723: 1721: 1720:Walled garden 1718: 1716: 1713: 1711: 1708: 1706: 1703: 1701: 1698: 1696: 1693: 1691: 1688: 1686: 1683: 1681: 1678: 1676: 1673: 1671: 1668: 1666: 1663: 1661: 1658: 1656: 1653: 1651: 1648: 1646: 1643: 1641: 1638: 1636: 1633: 1631: 1628: 1626: 1623: 1621: 1618: 1616: 1613: 1611: 1608: 1606: 1603: 1601: 1598: 1596: 1593: 1591: 1588: 1586: 1583: 1581: 1578: 1576: 1573: 1571: 1568: 1566: 1563: 1561: 1558: 1556: 1553: 1551: 1548: 1546: 1545:Mine a source 1543: 1541: 1538: 1536: 1533: 1531: 1528: 1524: 1521: 1519: 1516: 1514: 1511: 1509: 1506: 1504: 1501: 1499: 1496: 1495: 1494: 1491: 1489: 1486: 1484: 1481: 1479: 1476: 1474: 1471: 1469: 1466: 1464: 1461: 1459: 1456: 1454: 1451: 1449: 1446: 1444: 1441: 1439: 1436: 1434: 1431: 1429: 1426: 1424: 1421: 1419: 1416: 1414: 1411: 1409: 1406: 1404: 1401: 1399: 1396: 1394: 1393:Concept cloud 1391: 1389: 1386: 1384: 1381: 1379: 1376: 1374: 1371: 1369: 1366: 1364: 1363:Cherrypicking 1361: 1359: 1356: 1354: 1351: 1349: 1346: 1344: 1341: 1339: 1336: 1334: 1331: 1329: 1326: 1324: 1321: 1319: 1316: 1314: 1311: 1309: 1306: 1304: 1301: 1299: 1296: 1294: 1291: 1289: 1286: 1284: 1281: 1279: 1276: 1274: 1271: 1269: 1266: 1265: 1263: 1261: 1257: 1251: 1248: 1246: 1243: 1241: 1238: 1236: 1233: 1231: 1228: 1226: 1223: 1221: 1218: 1216: 1213: 1211: 1208: 1206: 1203: 1201: 1198: 1196: 1195:Systemic bias 1193: 1191: 1188: 1186: 1183: 1181: 1178: 1176: 1173: 1171: 1168: 1166: 1163: 1161: 1158: 1156: 1153: 1151: 1148: 1146: 1143: 1141: 1138: 1136: 1133: 1131: 1128: 1126: 1123: 1121: 1118: 1116: 1113: 1111: 1108: 1106: 1103: 1101: 1098: 1096: 1093: 1091: 1088: 1086: 1083: 1081: 1078: 1076: 1073: 1071: 1068: 1066: 1063: 1061: 1058: 1056: 1053: 1051: 1048: 1046: 1043: 1041: 1038: 1036: 1033: 1031: 1028: 1026: 1023: 1022: 1020: 1016: 1012: 1008: 1003: 999: 992: 985: 980: 978: 973: 971: 966: 965: 962: 952: 945: 942: 939: 938: 937: 934: 932: 922: 918: 915: 912: 911: 910: 904: 899: 898: 894: 890: 886: 882: 881: 877: 872: 871: 867: 862: 858: 854: 850: 846: 842: 838: 834: 830: 826: 822: 818: 814: 810: 807: 803: 800: 796: 792: 791: 789: 785: 781: 780:encyclopedias 777: 773: 772: 771: 764: 761: 753: 748: 744: 741: 737: 734: 731: 727: 723: 719: 715: 712: 708: 705: 701: 698: 694: 691: 687: 684: 682:assessments). 680: 677: 675:of followers. 674: 670: 669: 668: 659: 655: 652:This section 650: 647: 643: 642: 635: 628: 620: 619: 618: 614: 611: 606: 605: 604: 602: 598: 595: 588: 584: 581: 577: 576: 574: 570: 569: 567: 563: 560: 555: 550: 549: 547: 543: 540: 539: 535: 530: 528: 524: 520: 517: 516: 510: 506: 502: 499: 498: 496: 492: 488: 484: 483: 476: 473: 472: 469: 468:wp:NOTCATALOG 465: 462: 459: 455: 451: 448: 445: 442: 441: 437: 432: 427: 424: 423: 422: 420: 412: 410: 408: 403: 398: 393: 391: 387: 383: 379: 375: 371: 364: 362: 360: 356: 351: 349: 345: 340: 336: 331: 329: 325: 321: 317: 313: 305: 303: 301: 297: 293: 289: 285: 281: 279: 275: 270: 268: 264: 260: 256: 252: 248: 240: 238: 235: 233: 229: 225: 221: 217: 216:verifiability 213: 207: 205: 201: 197: 191: 183: 182:WP:PROFCRITIC 179: 176: 172: 171: 168: 161: 153: 151: 149: 145: 140: 138: 134: 130: 126: 121: 117: 116:cookie-cutter 109: 104: 96: 91: 88: 81: 80: 68: 64: 63: 60: 55: 50: 46: 40: 38: 34: 28: 21: 20: 3727:About essays 3716:About essays 3623:Rouge editor 3573:Oops Defense 3353:Barnstaritis 3318:Assume faith 3140:Pokémon test 2985:High Schools 2954: 2807:WikiBullying 2771:Superhatting 2766:POV railroad 2463:Just drop it 2267:Nobody cares 2101:Divisiveness 1625:Printability 1518:Style guides 1308:Amnesia test 1165:Paraphrasing 935: 927: 908: 844: 840: 816: 805: 798: 794: 768: 666: 658:adding to it 653: 616: 612: 600: 596: 572: 565: 561: 545: 541: 526: 518: 508: 504: 463: 450:Practicality 449: 443: 416: 397:Exclusionism 394: 368: 352: 334: 332: 327: 323: 315: 309: 282: 273: 271: 244: 236: 209: 193: 189: 160:introduction 147: 143: 141: 119: 113: 94: 89: 67:WP:SNOWFLAKE 30: 3734:Essay guide 3618:Rouge admin 3185:Video links 3040:No big loss 2729:just madmen 2679:Don't shout 2453:How to lose 2448:Get over it 2232:Be the glue 2151:Negotiation 2008:Relist bias 1838:Removing or 1670:Stub Makers 1503:Law sources 1433:Don't panic 889:WP:NOTGUIDE 845:significant 806:specialized 801:is welcome. 519:Slow growth 495:wp:snowball 300:advertising 288:independent 200:independent 31:This is an 3825:Categories 3790:Guidelines 3558:No, really 3538:LTTAUTMAOK 3020:Make stubs 2741:No racists 2483:Say "MOBY" 2205:Philosophy 2078:The basics 1635:Publicists 1605:Presentism 1550:Merge Test 1535:Inaccuracy 1018:Philosophy 788:gazetteers 758:See also: 613:Navigation 597:Saturation 523:wp:NOTDONE 390:guidelines 380:" such as 320:notability 220:notability 148:Commentary 37:notability 3268:Adminitis 2837:WikiPeace 2812:WikiCrime 2791:UPPERCASE 2171:Thank you 1803:Proseline 1595:Permastub 1160:Paradoxes 1075:Don't lie 853:reputable 841:Reception 793:Note the 720:with one 704:TV series 562:Obscurity 478:products. 374:consensus 306:Rationale 274:snowflake 206:(WP:GNG). 167:Shortcuts 144:Reception 3785:Policies 2935:Coatrack 2832:WikiLove 2822:WikiHate 2736:No Nazis 2709:Griefing 1973:Immunity 1225:Trifecta 1055:Cohesion 804:And the 795:almanacs 784:almanacs 726:theology 487:preserve 378:factions 263:in depth 196:critique 59:Shortcut 3448:Emerson 3288:ANI flu 2252:Failure 2091:Apology 1988:Nothing 1185:Purpose 857:neutral 837:artists 564:(e.g. " 542:Routine 464:Clarity 444:Utility 353:So per 2930:Clones 2507:Don'ts 2428:Desist 2418:Candor 2327:Reader 876:WP:NOT 797:where 786:, and 776:pillar 724:whose 722:parish 711:bishop 690:gadget 503:but a 454:wp:AfD 402:WP:GNG 278:weight 253:. The 249:since 241:Limits 224:merged 2181:Truce 833:music 829:films 825:books 730:dogma 106:They 33:essay 3453:Fart 3398:Crap 1783:Coup 1135:Need 951:main 891:and 835:and 431:wp:V 127:and 2371:Dos 994:(?) 851:of 790:." 716:An 575:". 568:") 384:or 350:. 326:or 298:or 265:or 146:or 35:on 3827:: 954:}} 948:{{ 933:) 887:, 831:, 827:, 815:: 782:, 728:, 709:A 695:A 688:A 615:. 599:. 521:. 466:. 361:. 337:. 302:. 135:, 131:, 983:e 976:t 969:v 878:. 863:. 660:. 589:. 556:. 39:.

Index

essay
notability
Knowledge (XXG)'s policies or guidelines
thoroughly vetted by the community
Shortcut
WP:SNOWFLAKE

all look the same
cookie-cutter
Hollywood blockbusters
direct-to-video films
fictional characters
obscure branches of popular culture subjects
introduction
Shortcuts
WP:PROFESSIONAL
WP:PROFCRITIC
critique
independent
notability guidelines
reliable sources
verifiability
notability
merged
continuous improvement
keep it growing
enduring notability
Knowledge (XXG) is not a newspaper
inclusion criteria
routine coverage

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑