562:
the elements you propose - the only requirement relevant to this exchange is that citation style be consistent, which in this case it is as far as I see. You're welcome to oppose if your suggestions are not implemented, but I would suggest that opposing on those grounds alone will likely not carry a
168:
You'd think that after centuries of systematic research, we would at least know all the mammal species occurring in Europe. Wrong; new species are discovered every few years. Even then, you'd probably think that whatever new species are found are marginal and occur in small areas. Wrong again. This
586:
I scratch my comment re italics, if I mentioned it at all it should only have been as a query. I still think that DOI links are important for verification and accessibility: DOIs are designed as permanent links, PDF copies (while great as free access to full text) don't necessarily have the same
169:
article is about a bat species first named in 2001 that is now known to occur pretty much all over Europe (and quite possibly, also outside Europe). Our knowledge of the species is still limited, but we are beginning to acquire a good understanding of its ecology and distribution.
410:- I sometimes wonder about using genus names as nouns (i.e. should it remain italicised if used like this as a descriptive noun rather than indicating the genus) - I'd have thought a safer wording is "Myotis alcathoe is the smallest European member of the genus Myotis"
457:
mini template (even if you have a full text link, the DOI is still needed). Also look for any PMID, PMC or JSTOR records (latter maybe only needed if no other link available). I expect that the recent papers should have at least one of these indexes available
176:
and several others, I've been able to read almost all of the by now voluminous literature on the species. The article was improved by a review by Sasata and a GA review by
Ceranthor, and I'm looking forward to your reviews here at FAC.
842:, and, having read through it again, can't find anything additional to complain about. Did you know that Ucucha has "a virtual collection of the interiors of bat penises"? I thought my collection of fungi on animal dung was odd... :)
587:
longevity (also consider DOI display in offline
Knowledge versions). I don't really think that use of DOIs is a style issue, rather a content one. Anyway, it looks like the article is missing the following three links:
524:
To the best of my knowledge, all sources that are available online have the title linked to the online version, either through the DOI or through a direct link (i.e., to the page the DOI redirects to).
534:
Sorry, I wasn't commenting on this articles references, they all look fine. I meant in general, I just got the idea from your comment that you thought
Knowledge shouldn't include them at all! Cheers,
117:
675:
Nothing specifically discusses niche differentiation. However, its habitat requirements (described in detail in the article) do appear to be different from (and more restricted than) those of
486:
supports all of my suggestions (I was not requesting use of citation templates, merely mentioning a possible quick win). I would have to oppose if none of the suggestions are actioned.
213:
Earwig`s tool found no copyvio, a few spotchecks found no close paraphrasing (although I can`t read
Swedish or Spanish or Czech or German or Romanian or Slovenian or Ukrainian)
232:
Ministry of
Environment and Spatial Planning, Republic of Serbia, 2010 vs Ministry of Environment and Spatial Planning of the Republic of Serbia. 2009 - which is correct¿
577:
Also, I've so far written 30 featured articles with this exact citation style. If consensus is that that style is to be changed, so be it, but I doubt that is the case.
711:
Under "France": "It is caught at caves in late summer and autumn." Why is it caught? For regular scientific studies? Or was this supposed to be past tense?
40:
501:
That's your choice. Lots of academic sources do not italicize journal titles and do not routinely include DOIs and PMIDs; Knowledge should do the same.
425:- similar issue to the above. maybe either an addjective "Nematoceran" or "the diet of Myotis alcathoe mostly consists of flies of the suborder
699:
There are several. However, there is no consensus on the precise position of this species, so there isn't much of a point in showing one here.
510:
Adding DOIs certainly adds some value to
Knowledge. If you want to check sources (we should all be critical!) a DOI link is much appreciated.
30:
17:
603:
88:
83:
789:
No problem. I'll try to read it again tomorrow before I add my support. I'm too tired tonight to say I gave it a thorough review. –
92:
224:
Is
Sauerbier et al 2006 or 2007¿ Check dates between References and Literature, as a few of them seem to have been mistranscribed
75:
882:
873:
851:
830:
804:
784:
774:
751:
719:
703:
687:
637:
625:
616:
581:
572:
543:
529:
519:
505:
496:
477:
468:
435:
398:
367:
347:
309:
286:
277:
261:
247:
202:
181:
160:
599:
394:
363:
133:
138:
447:
section needs work: Journal names must be italics. If there are DOIs for any of the papers they should be given using
631:
257:
Journal article. The journal has the weird name "Plecotus et al.", and they published volumes 11 and 12 together.
339:"methods" scans oddly, invites the reader to think "methods of what?" - why not say "testing" or "investigations"
483:
282:
It used the standard citation for IUCN Red List entries. Thanks for the review, and sorry for my sloppiness.
870:
823:
797:
767:
621:
Thanks for finding those. I've added the ISBN and the BJZ link; however, the DOI doesn't appear to exist.
839:
568:
273:
79:
539:
515:
352:
Aah, studies! That word eluded me and is a better choice than the ones that sprang to mind first.
607:
487:
459:
388:
357:
866:
817:
791:
761:
596:
254:
Bibliographic information for
Gazaryan is a bit confusing - what kind of publication is this¿
879:
847:
781:
748:
716:
700:
684:
634:
622:
588:
578:
526:
502:
474:
432:
344:
305:
283:
258:
244:
178:
157:
53:
564:
269:
196:
71:
64:
216:
Niermann and
Brinkmann or Brinkmann and Niermann¿ Funkel or Funkelmann¿ Dykyy or Dyvyy¿
555:
535:
511:
384:
353:
173:
451:
109:
843:
301:
426:
191:
592:
172:
This article comprehensively reflects that knowledge; thanks to the help of
667:
Any information about how the species manages to be sympatric with other
268:
The Hutson entry seems to be using a different format than the others.
39:
Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in
862:"pers. comm. in Skiba, 2003, p. 107" I see a Skiba 209 but no '03.
662:
As always, a well-developed, detailed article. A few comments:
423:
the diet of Myotis alcathoe mostly consists of
Nematocera flies,
482:
That's a disappointing attitude. I think that the guidance at
695:
Has anyone constructed a phylogenetic tree for the genus?
143:
731:
oaks" – The other items in this short list read "limes (
105:
101:
97:
57:
335:..but it was not until the advent of genetic methods..
118:
Featured article candidates/Myotis alcathoe/archive1
815:On the second read, it looks good. Great job! –
895:The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
473:There is no requirement for any of these things.
408:Myotis alcathoe is the smallest European Myotis
343:Changing to "studies". Thanks for your review!
43:. No further edits should be made to this page.
759:That's all I found the first time through. –
901:No further edits should be made to this page.
671:? Any observations on niche differentiation?
29:The following is an archived discussion of a
8:
243:Triest University Press in Italian. Fixed.
122:
41:Knowledge talk:Featured article candidates
125:
115:
838:—I gave the article a pretty thorough
379:It;s late here. Will continue reading
18:Knowledge:Featured article candidates
7:
189:- no dabs or dead external links. --
878:Both fixed; thanks for the check.
630:I found that the DOI is listed at
24:
300:Both images are freely-licensed.
633:, which I've linked to instead.
865:Should Funkelmann be Funkel? –
1:
785:23:53, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
775:23:48, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
752:23:53, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
720:23:53, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
704:23:53, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
688:23:53, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
638:21:24, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
626:21:16, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
617:21:12, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
582:23:56, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
573:23:53, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
544:13:08, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
530:12:53, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
520:12:21, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
506:23:48, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
497:23:44, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
478:23:25, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
469:23:22, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
436:00:20, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
399:14:02, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
368:22:38, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
348:14:22, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
324:reading through - notes below
310:12:09, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
287:17:35, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
278:16:24, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
262:17:35, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
248:17:35, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
203:20:25, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
187:Disambig/External Link check
182:18:22, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
161:18:22, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
31:featured article nomination
918:
431::::Both of these tweaked.
883:13:20, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
874:10:18, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
852:16:01, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
831:15:36, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
805:00:02, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
240:What does EUT stand for¿
898:Please do not modify it.
739:)". Why not say "oaks (
593:10.3161/1508110042176590
36:Please do not modify it.
780:Thanks for the review!
563:lot of weight. YMMV.
295:image copyright check
56:21:28, 5 March 2011
383:now. Goodnight :)
326:all else in order:
484:WP:Citing sources
164:
151:
150:
909:
900:
826:
820:
800:
794:
770:
764:
614:
494:
466:
456:
450:
445:Literature cited
199:
194:
154:
123:
113:
95:
48:The article was
38:
917:
916:
912:
911:
910:
908:
907:
906:
905:
896:
824:
818:
798:
792:
768:
762:
608:
488:
460:
454:
448:
197:
192:
86:
72:Myotis alcathoe
70:
68:
65:Myotis alcathoe
34:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
915:
913:
904:
903:
890:
888:
887:
886:
885:
863:
860:
840:pre-FAC review
810:
809:
808:
807:
757:
756:
755:
754:
737:Betula pendula
724:
723:
722:
708:
707:
706:
692:
691:
690:
655:
654:
653:
652:
651:
650:
649:
648:
647:
646:
645:
644:
643:
642:
641:
640:
552:
551:
550:
549:
548:
547:
546:
441:
440:
439:
438:
415:
414:
413:
412:
377:
376:
375:
374:
373:
372:
371:
370:
328:
327:
313:
312:
298:
291:
290:
289:
266:
265:
264:
252:
251:
250:
238:
237:
236:
230:
229:
228:
222:
221:
220:
214:
166:
165:
156:Nominator(s):
149:
148:
147:
146:
144:External links
141:
136:
128:
127:
121:
120:
67:
62:
61:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
914:
902:
899:
893:
892:
891:
884:
881:
877:
876:
875:
872:
868:
864:
861:
859:
856:
855:
854:
853:
849:
845:
841:
837:
833:
832:
829:
827:
821:
814:
806:
803:
801:
795:
788:
787:
786:
783:
779:
778:
777:
776:
773:
771:
765:
753:
750:
746:
745:
744:
742:
741:Quercus robur
738:
734:
733:Tilia cordata
730:
729:Quercus robur
725:
721:
718:
714:
713:
712:
709:
705:
702:
698:
697:
696:
693:
689:
686:
682:
678:
677:M. mystacinus
674:
673:
672:
670:
665:
664:
663:
661:
660:
639:
636:
632:
629:
628:
627:
624:
620:
619:
618:
615:
613:
612:
605:
601:
598:
594:
590:
585:
584:
583:
580:
576:
575:
574:
570:
566:
561:
557:
553:
545:
541:
537:
533:
532:
531:
528:
523:
522:
521:
517:
513:
509:
508:
507:
504:
500:
499:
498:
495:
493:
492:
485:
481:
480:
479:
476:
472:
471:
470:
467:
465:
464:
453:
446:
443:
442:
437:
434:
430:
428:
424:
419:
418:
417:
416:
411:
409:
405:
404:
403:
402:
401:
400:
396:
393:
390:
386:
382:
369:
365:
362:
359:
355:
351:
350:
349:
346:
342:
341:
340:
337:
336:
332:
331:
330:
329:
325:
321:
319:
315:
314:
311:
307:
303:
299:
296:
292:
288:
285:
281:
280:
279:
275:
271:
267:
263:
260:
256:
255:
253:
249:
246:
242:
241:
239:
234:
233:
231:
226:
225:
223:
218:
217:
215:
212:
211:
210:
209:
208:Source review
205:
204:
201:
200:
195:
188:
184:
183:
180:
175:
170:
163:
162:
159:
153:
152:
145:
142:
140:
137:
135:
132:
131:
130:
129:
124:
119:
116:
114:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
66:
63:
60:
58:
55:
51:
44:
42:
37:
32:
27:
26:
19:
897:
894:
889:
857:
835:
834:
819:VisionHolder
816:
812:
811:
793:VisionHolder
790:
763:VisionHolder
760:
758:
740:
736:
735:), birches (
732:
728:
726:
710:
694:
680:
676:
668:
666:
658:
657:
656:
610:
609:
559:
490:
489:
462:
461:
444:
422:
421:
407:
406:
391:
380:
378:
360:
338:
334:
333:
323:
317:
316:
294:
207:
206:
190:
186:
185:
171:
167:
155:
139:Citation bot
69:
49:
47:
35:
28:
681:M. brandtii
293:Here is an
54:Laser brain
715:Reworded.
600:3440096939
565:Nikkimaria
554:Rjwilmsi,
427:Nematocera
297:by Stifle.
270:Nikkimaria
747:Changed.
659:Comments:
558:does not
858:Comments
813:Support:
611:Rjwilmsi
491:Rjwilmsi
463:Rjwilmsi
395:contribs
385:Casliber
364:contribs
354:Casliber
318:Comments
174:Thgoiter
134:Analysis
50:promoted
867:Peacock
836:Support
560:require
556:WP:CITE
320:Support
126:Toolbox
89:protect
84:history
880:Ucucha
844:Sasata
782:Ucucha
749:Ucucha
717:Ucucha
701:Ucucha
685:Ucucha
669:Myotis
635:Ucucha
623:Ucucha
579:Ucucha
527:Ucucha
503:Ucucha
475:Ucucha
433:Ucucha
381:tomorr
345:Ucucha
302:Stifle
284:Ucucha
259:Ucucha
245:Ucucha
235:Fixed.
227:Fixed.
219:Fixed.
179:Ucucha
158:Ucucha
93:delete
825:talk
799:talk
769:talk
604:a PDF
110:views
102:watch
98:links
16:<
871:Lane
848:talk
679:and
602:and
597:ISBN
569:talk
540:talk
536:Jack
516:talk
512:Jack
389:talk
358:talk
306:talk
274:talk
193:Pres
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
743:)"?
589:doi
452:DOI
52:by
850:)
683:.
606:.
595:,
571:)
542:)
518:)
455:}}
449:{{
429:,"
420:..
397:)
366:)
322:-
308:)
276:)
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
59:.
33:.
869:.
846:(
828:»
822:«
802:»
796:«
772:»
766:«
727:"
591::
567:(
538:(
514:(
392:·
387:(
361:·
356:(
304:(
272:(
198:N
112:)
74:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.