291:
130:, as it's just cited to the specific book by London itself, so the editor is probably interpreting that into the article. One footnote is really just an unsourced inflation value of currency, and most of the books cited lack publishers. In addition to the many instance of uncited prose, this needs very substantial sourcing work.
270:, this sounds like a cool project, but I'm not sure at this point that it is easing review burden here. I'm going to pull Sumit's post back from archive at WT:FAR for some more discussion. In the meantime, can I suggest you update the research page to reflect that the study is no longer solely observational?
215:
Ditto with "great numbers"; just stating the number doesn't make it clear that in relation to the population at the time this was a significant proportion (nowadays, 100,000 people at a London event wouldn't be particular significant). It seems to me like you're looking for what you consider weasel
337:
I actually agree with the suggestions. "Fiercely" is redundant. It would be better to state the population of London rather than use the vague phrase "great numbers". If
Radical refers to a specific political movement, it should be capitalized, otherwise removed as confusing.
107:. There are unsourced paragraphs, unsourced statements, unattributed quotes, weasel words without attribution, a section consisting largely of quotes, inconsistent citation styles and short, stubby paragraphs that do not meet the prose criterion.
171:
Great numbers, of East
Londoners, perhaps 100,000, turned out to oppose them and there were three-way clashes between the Fascists, their East End opponents and the Police. (can be reworded to avoid "Great numbers" and just state the
298:
and thanks for pulling back the thread. I'm interested in learning more about the review burden here and what might help. A lot of the machine learning work I've done in the past is focused on reducing review burden (see
245:
This AI is trained using editor behavior from
Knowledge (XXG). In this case, the AI is telling us that editors tend to change sentences that look like this and include "POV" or "NPOV" in their edit summaries.
213:
was a specific political movement; "the radical notion of poverty being involuntary" contrasts with the conservative belief that the poor were to blame for their own poverty.
168:
They advocated focusing on the causes of poverty and the radical notion of poverty being involuntary, rather than the result of innate indolence. ("radical" seems redundant)
242:
on this AI. Would you be interested in helping us test and refine this AI? Any suggestions for articles/categories you would be interested in seeing us test against?
187:
182:
issues and missing citations. It is meant to ease the review burden for
Featured Articles. If such predictions are relevant, we appreciate more feedback
374:
40:
104:
307:
and I are working on, we stand a chance of helping with FAR burden but I'm not familiar with the bottlenecks in the process we can target. --
90:
498:
30:
17:
122:
I've got some more sourcing concerns as well. At least one blog is cited, the books cited frequently lack specific page numbers, etc.
124:
This idea of the East End as lying beyond the pale of respectability was also emphasised by Jack London when he visited London in 1902,
509:
183:
86:
528:
489:
472:
450:
430:
409:
386:
354:
322:
318:
303:
and the editquality models for counter-vandalism and draftquality models for new page review). I think that, with the methods
279:
261:
257:
220:
199:
139:
116:
82:
343:
178:
These statement issues have been identified through an AI that can automatically identify statements having minor
210:
468:
405:
186:
to help evaluate our AI and make it robust to aid in article reviews. More details can be found on the
524:
426:
382:
275:
195:
314:
253:
485:
135:
72:
459:
396:
147:
339:
61:
179:
520:
446:
422:
378:
366:
362:
304:
284:
271:
239:
235:
217:
191:
112:
53:
127:
308:
267:
247:
162:
481:
131:
123:
516:
370:
348:
158:
57:
442:
108:
505:, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the
441:. None of the problems identified in the review section have been addressed.
154:
103:
I am nominating this featured article for review because it no longer meets
480:- The more significant issues (ei sourcing) haven't really been touched.
373:
for the valuable feedback here. I have posted my responses on the main
216:
words, without bothering to check if they're appropriate in context. ‑
157:
burned with an eerie blue flame, caused by a hit on a gin factory at
300:
165:'s Silvertown sugar refinery was hit. ("fiercely" seems redundant)
39:
Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at
421:
Issues raised in the review section include sourcing and prose.
65:
146:Some of the statements below may have violated the
536:The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
43:. No further edits should be made to this page.
542:No further edits should be made to this page.
515:template in place on the talk page until the
29:The following is an archived discussion of a
8:
161:, and the Thames itself burnt fiercely when
41:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Featured article review
238:. These are good notes. I'm working with
105:Knowledge (XXG):Featured article criteria
91:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject UK geography
18:Knowledge (XXG):Featured article review
7:
87:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject England
309:
248:
83:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject London
24:
153:Bizarre events occurred when the
289:
64:) 2:13, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
1:
529:22:13, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
490:05:29, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
473:17:39, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
451:14:49, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
387:06:06, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
355:22:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
323:12:45, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
280:22:10, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
262:18:09, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
221:06:15, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
200:05:53, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
140:05:22, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
117:15:16, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
431:14:10, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
410:07:11, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
209:How is "radical" redundant?
559:
539:Please do not modify it.
36:Please do not modify it.
510:featured article review
31:featured article review
73:East End of London
499:removal candidate
395:, no engagement.
375:discussion thread
94:
550:
541:
514:
508:
465:
458:, unaddressed.
402:
351:
311:
297:
293:
292:
250:
125:
79:
48:The article was
38:
558:
557:
553:
552:
551:
549:
548:
547:
546:
537:
512:
506:
488:
463:
417:
400:
363:User:Iridescent
349:
290:
288:
236:User:Iridescent
163:Tate & Lyle
138:
101:
76:
34:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
556:
554:
545:
544:
532:
531:
519:goes through.
492:
484:
475:
453:
435:
434:
416:
413:
390:
389:
358:
357:
334:
333:
332:
331:
330:
329:
328:
327:
326:
325:
243:
227:
226:
225:
224:
207:
176:
175:
174:
173:
169:
166:
143:
142:
134:
100:
99:Review section
97:
96:
95:
75:
70:
69:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
555:
543:
540:
534:
533:
530:
526:
522:
518:
511:
504:
500:
496:
493:
491:
487:
483:
479:
476:
474:
470:
466:
462:
457:
454:
452:
448:
444:
440:
437:
436:
433:
432:
428:
424:
419:
418:
414:
412:
411:
407:
403:
399:
394:
388:
384:
380:
376:
372:
368:
364:
360:
359:
356:
353:
352:
345:
341:
336:
335:
324:
320:
316:
312:
306:
302:
296:
286:
283:
282:
281:
277:
273:
269:
265:
264:
263:
259:
255:
251:
244:
241:
237:
233:
232:
231:
230:
229:
228:
223:
222:
219:
212:
208:
206:
205:
204:
203:
202:
201:
197:
193:
189:
188:research page
185:
181:
170:
167:
164:
160:
156:
152:
151:
149:
145:
144:
141:
137:
133:
129:
121:
120:
119:
118:
114:
110:
106:
98:
93:
92:
88:
84:
78:
77:
74:
71:
68:
66:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
37:
32:
27:
26:
19:
538:
535:
502:
495:Closing note
494:
477:
460:
455:
438:
420:
415:FARC section
397:
393:Move to FARC
392:
391:
347:
294:
214:
177:
150:guidelines:
126:is possible
102:
80:
49:
47:
35:
28:
371:User:Buidhe
159:Three Mills
521:Nikkimaria
423:Nikkimaria
367:Nikkimaria
285:Nikkimaria
272:Nikkimaria
240:Sumit.iitp
218:Iridescent
211:Radicalism
81:Notified:
54:Nikkimaria
501:has been
310:EpochFail
268:EpochFail
249:EpochFail
155:River Lea
503:delisted
497:: This
482:Hog Farm
319:contribs
258:contribs
172:numbers)
132:Hog Farm
50:delisted
464:Georgia
401:Georgia
361:Thanks
301:mw:ORES
234:Thanks
478:Delist
456:Delist
439:Delist
350:buidhe
58:FACBot
486:Bacon
461:Sandy
443:DrKay
398:Sandy
379:Sumit
192:Sumit
136:Bacon
128:WP:OR
109:DrKay
16:<
525:talk
469:Talk
447:talk
427:talk
406:Talk
383:talk
369:and
315:talk
295:Done
276:talk
254:talk
196:talk
184:here
148:NPOV
113:talk
62:talk
56:via
517:bot
471:)
408:)
287:.
266:Hi
180:POV
52:by
527:)
513:}}
507:{{
449:)
429:)
385:)
377:.
365:,
346:)
342:·
321:)
317:•
278:)
260:)
256:•
246:--
198:)
190:.
115:)
89:,
85:,
67:.
33:.
523:(
467:(
445:(
425:(
404:(
381:(
344:c
340:t
338:(
313:(
305:|
274:(
252:(
194:(
111:(
60:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.