414:"With the recent fleet expansion of 48 cars to accommodate ridership growth SkyTrain has reconfigured most of the Mark II’s (new and old) into 4-car trains to provide more capacity with the same number of trains (55) at the same headway (108 sec.). With plans for an additional 24 cars at some point (subject to TransLink’s funding capacity), SkyTrain plans to likely further increase the number of 6-car Mark I’s in the overall ripple effect of maximizing the number of cars in service and overall service to SkyTrain passengers."
473:, instead of removing the word 'recent' and looking at the very citation for that sentence and putting in the date, that was actually included in the citation template is really, counterproductive in terms of the work it takes to do that there and the come here and report the entire sentence in a quote. The article is informative and well researched.
462:
templates to the article than simple removing one or two words to fix the problem. I've looked over the nominators history of FAR and disagree with many of the reasons he chooses including some of the trivial ones here. It also appears that unnecessary excuses are being made to demote this article.
504:
If editors feel that the article should be kept, however, they are free to express that here. If a strong consensus is gained that includes uninvolved editors, the article may be kept before moving to FARC. It is true that keep/delist "votes" shouldn't be made in this section, but there is a very
505:
thin line between saying "keep" and giving a reason (as above) and saying "This article meets FA criteria and doesn't need to be moved to the FARC section" and that line is occasionally crossed by users inexperienced with FAR/FARC (and is not really a big deal if it is crossed occasionally).
243:"The Canada Line's trains are fully automated, but are of a different design than the existing lines' Bombardier-built fleet, and use conventional electric motors rather than Bombardier's linear induction technology." — unsourced
140:
135:
130:
148:
327:
Thank you for making the notifications TPH. I just realized that I saw and commented on the FAR less than five minutes after you posted it, before the notifications appeared in your contributions.
124:
348:
Please note two things: dead links are not a reason for delisting (there is a guideline for how to handle dead links), and many FAs were improperly tagged by
Mattisse. You should
420:"There had been plans as early as the 1950s to build a monorail system, with modernist architect Wells Coates pencilled in to design it; that project was abandoned."
384:
Is it controversial information that actually needs a cite, however? Even FAs don't need to have every sentence referenced - just "where appropriate" according to
233:
93:
88:
255:
Controversy section should probably be renamed, but I can't think of a more neutral name. Aren't we supposed to be avoiding the word "controversy"?
97:
40:
80:
416:— When is "recent?" "plans to likely further increase" is an awkward split infinitive. "Ripple effect" sentence seems like it needs a cite.
188:
275:
will fix most of the problems, as there are still issues with unsourced content, two-sentence paragraphs and several now-dead references.
164:
196:
192:
30:
17:
571:
551:
514:
495:
481:
443:
401:
379:
364:
336:
322:
305:
295:
280:
226:
169:
53:
310:
They should be listed at the top of the FAR, with links to the talk pages, so that others can verify notifications.
84:
261:"Bombardier Mark II train fleet" section and "Canada Line train fleet" sections are largely unsourced as well.
544:
389:
360:
318:
510:
490:
This isn't the part where you say "keep"/"delist"/etc. That would be if and when this is moved to FARC.
397:
332:
291:
222:
567:
76:
64:
213:
452:- to be blunt, not every single sentence needs a citation. More amount of time was spent adding
536:
422:— existing tag from before I touched the article; this one seems like it does need a citation
353:
311:
200:
506:
393:
328:
287:
236:. Tags indicate dead links and unsourced statements dating from November and December 2009.
218:
563:
531:
385:
392:, which is the page linked from WIAFA that details the necessary spots for referencing.
216:, as they did some work on the article after a talk page notification several weeks ago.
479:
467:
456:
432:"The system however caused passenger confusion as well as extensive train delays."
114:
249:
Entire "Security" and "Design" sections need copy edit; short paragraphs abound.
240:
Intro needs a slight rewrite. It shouldn't begin with a two-sentence paragraph.
474:
352:
list the problems and check the tags, as they aren't always correct.
370:
I pointed out two whole sections that have only one source for the
39:
Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at
546:
vote in the
Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll
409:
Okay, here are a couple sections I have specific issues with:
258:"ICTS Mark I fleet" section is almost entirely unsourced.
174:
141:
Featured article candidates/SkyTrain (Vancouver)/archive3
136:
Featured article candidates/SkyTrain (Vancouver)/archive2
131:
Featured article candidates/SkyTrain (Vancouver)/archive1
562:- nothing going on at the moment, needs more citations.
272:
110:
106:
102:
57:
246:"Recently, the entire surveillance system..." — when?
149:
Featured article review/SkyTrain (Vancouver)/archive1
579:The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
125:Featured article candidates/SkyTrain (Vancouver)
43:. No further edits should be made to this page.
585:No further edits should be made to this page.
426:"This seat is popular with rail enthusiasts."
29:The following is an archived discussion of a
8:
264:Wildbot shows two links to broken #sections.
286:Please notify relevant users and projects.
234:Knowledge:Featured articles/Cleanup listing
273:way the article looked at its FA promotion
153:
156:
146:
121:
271:I do not feel that a reversion to the
41:Knowledge talk:Featured article review
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Featured article review
267:Very large number of dead links.
494:, his otters and a clue-bat •
442:, his otters and a clue-bat •
378:, his otters and a clue-bat •
304:, his otters and a clue-bat •
279:, his otters and a clue-bat •
252:History section has some tags.
232:This is the highest listing on
1:
438:I'm sure I'll dig up more.
602:
532:Featured article criterion
388:. Perhaps you should read
572:23:31, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
582:Please do not modify it.
552:00:43, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
36:Please do not modify it.
534:of concern is sourcing
515:15:35, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
496:16:34, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
482:05:00, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
444:14:05, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
434:— Not cited, should be.
402:13:40, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
380:13:09, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
365:12:39, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
337:13:40, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
323:12:05, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
306:11:48, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
296:11:45, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
281:11:41, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
227:15:09, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
31:featured article review
428:— Is this even needed?
390:Knowledge:When to cite
54:YellowAssessmentMonkey
77:SkyTrain (Vancouver)
65:SkyTrain (Vancouver)
56:02:33, 30 June 2010
463:Honestly, putting
214:User:ThePointblank
229:
208:
204:
201:User talk:Emarsee
182:
181:
71:Review commentary
593:
584:
547:
539:
493:
492:Ten Pound Hammer
477:
472:
466:
461:
455:
441:
440:Ten Pound Hammer
377:
376:Ten Pound Hammer
357:
315:
303:
302:Ten Pound Hammer
278:
277:Ten Pound Hammer
210:
207:
185:
154:
118:
100:
48:The article was
38:
601:
600:
596:
595:
594:
592:
591:
590:
589:
580:
545:
537:
527:
525:FARC commentary
491:
475:
470:
464:
459:
453:
439:
375:
355:
313:
301:
276:
145:
127:
91:
75:
73:
68:
34:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
599:
597:
588:
587:
575:
574:
556:
555:
526:
523:
522:
521:
520:
519:
518:
517:
499:
498:
485:
484:
436:
435:
429:
423:
417:
407:
406:
405:
404:
372:entire section
346:
345:
344:
343:
342:
341:
340:
339:
269:
268:
265:
262:
259:
256:
253:
250:
247:
244:
241:
206:
205:
180:
179:
178:
177:
175:External links
172:
167:
159:
158:
152:
151:
144:
143:
138:
133:
128:
123:
120:
72:
69:
67:
62:
61:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
598:
586:
583:
577:
576:
573:
569:
565:
561:
558:
557:
554:
553:
548:
543:
541:
540:
533:
529:
528:
524:
516:
512:
508:
503:
502:
501:
500:
497:
489:
488:
487:
486:
483:
480:
478:
469:
458:
451:
448:
447:
446:
445:
433:
430:
427:
424:
421:
418:
415:
412:
411:
410:
403:
399:
395:
391:
387:
383:
382:
381:
373:
369:
368:
367:
366:
362:
358:
351:
338:
334:
330:
326:
325:
324:
320:
316:
309:
308:
307:
299:
298:
297:
293:
289:
285:
284:
283:
282:
274:
266:
263:
260:
257:
254:
251:
248:
245:
242:
239:
238:
237:
235:
230:
228:
224:
220:
217:
215:
212:Also notifed
203:
202:
198:
194:
190:
184:
183:
176:
173:
171:
168:
166:
163:
162:
161:
160:
155:
150:
147:
142:
139:
137:
134:
132:
129:
126:
122:
119:
116:
112:
108:
104:
99:
95:
90:
86:
82:
78:
70:
66:
63:
60:
58:
55:
51:
44:
42:
37:
32:
27:
26:
19:
581:
578:
559:
549:
538:YellowMonkey
535:
530:
449:
437:
431:
425:
419:
413:
408:
371:
350:specifically
349:
347:
270:
231:
211:
209:
189:WP Vancouver
186:
170:Citation bot
74:
49:
47:
35:
28:
507:Dana boomer
394:Dana boomer
329:Dana boomer
288:Dana boomer
219:Dana boomer
187:Notified:
197:WP Trains
193:WP Canada
386:WP:WIAFA
165:Analysis
356:Georgia
314:Georgia
157:Toolbox
94:protect
89:history
50:removed
560:Delist
300:Done.
98:delete
564:Tom B
354:Sandy
312:Sandy
115:views
107:watch
103:links
16:<
568:talk
511:talk
476:Mkdw
468:when
457:fact
450:Keep
398:talk
361:Talk
333:talk
319:Talk
292:talk
223:talk
111:logs
85:talk
81:edit
550:)
52:by
570:)
513:)
471:}}
465:{{
460:}}
454:{{
400:)
374:.
363:)
335:)
321:)
294:)
225:)
199:,
195:,
191:,
113:|
109:|
105:|
101:|
96:|
92:|
87:|
83:|
59:.
33:.
566:(
542:(
509:(
396:(
359:(
331:(
317:(
290:(
221:(
117:)
79:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.