Knowledge

:Hardcore pornography images - Knowledge

Source 📝

229:. While many reputable publications on sexology feature illustrations of sexual positions and the like, by and large newspapers, books and printed encyclopedias that discuss pornography seriously in an educational context, as Knowledge aims to do, do not illustrate their articles, book covers etc. with sexually explicit still shots from pornographic movies or other hardcore pornographic images. To be true to its basic mission, which is to reflect reliable source coverage in a neutral manner, Knowledge should take its lead from reputable publications in this topic area, both for illustrations and textual content. 144:. Other images on Knowledge may also be problematic, but these images are especially problematic since they depict extreme sexual situations, and in some cases depict events that occur in pornography but not (at a verifiably notable level) in real life. A picture being worth a thousand words, this point may be lost on impressionable viewers. 35: 95: 150:, and this is by intentional design, since the pornographic genres they illustrate are misogynistic and degrading to women. While it may be appropriate to display images depicting the degradation of women in certain historical or sociological contexts, its not appropriate to use them in what is at least a borderline " 204:
It is true that the full application of the term "hardcore pornography" may be debated. Reasonable people may disagree over whether a particular article or image is hardcore pornography. That does not mean the term is without meaning, and in most cases, the application of the term is not contentious.
309:
as stating, "I'd like to really show what I believe the men want to see: violence against women. I firmly believe that we serve a purpose by showing that. The most violent we can get is the cum shot in the face. Men get off behind that because they get even with the women they can't have."
270:
The implication appears that "graphical depictions of sexual acts" are an example of material hosted here that some, not necessarily all, readers may find objectionable. Hardcore pornography images include and may go beyond images of common sexual behaviour, as depicted in articles such as
237:
We support the principle of least astonishment: content on Wikimedia projects should be presented to readers in such a way as to respect their expectations of what any page or feature might contain. ... We urge the community to pay particular attention to curating all kinds of potentially
134:. These few images are among the most contentious materials hosted on Knowledge, degrade Knowledge's reputation, create a political vulnerability for Knowledge, and drive away readers and potential new editors (including women; Knowledge has 192:
as "Pornography featuring sexual penetration and other sexuality explicit acts". ("Explicit" is further defined as "very specific, clear, or detailed" and as "containing material that might be deemed offensive or graphic".) Our article on
175:
as occurring in hardcore pornography. It does not address the use of images in articles covering real-life human sexuality where the behavior in question occurs among populations at a notable level, and this is
264:
Knowledge contains many different images, some of which are considered objectionable or offensive by some readers. For example, some articles contain graphical depictions of violence, human anatomy, or sexual
275:. Were Knowledge to eschew the display of certain hardcore images, our content would arguably be more subject to the cautions regarding objectionable material and offensiveness addressed in the disclaimer. 347:
by the Wikimedia Foundation and the Collaborative Creativity Group at UNU-MERIT, a joint research and training centre of United Nations University (UNU) and Maastricht University. 24 March 2010.
420: 238:
controversial content, including determining whether it has a realistic educational use and applying the principle of least astonishment in categorization and placement.
284: 158:
The Knowledge community is overwhelmingly composed of single, childless white males; yet Knowledge is conceived as a reference work for the general population.
259:
does not directly mention displaying hardcore pornography. Open to interpretation due to individual considerations, the closest it comes is this statement:
217:
available. This is basic policy when it comes to the textual content of Knowledge articles; Knowledge makes corresponding commitments in policies such as
478: 434: 243:
Readers will expect us to have educational articles on pornography topics, but our treatment of these topics should not be astonishingly
376: 439: 54:
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Knowledge contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of
322: 55: 468: 222: 391: 226: 120:
On the one hand, the articles this essay is concerned with are mostly about obscure sub-genres of pornography. These are not
444: 180:, and there is sufficient material for a worthwhile encyclopedia article, and the image depicts this real-life behavior. 386: 256: 500: 232:
This is also consistent with the Wikimedia Foundation board resolution on controversial content, which states,
449: 415: 135: 121: 473: 218: 410: 272: 127:
On the other hand, in return for the minimal encyclopedic value imparted by these images, we have that:
47: 405: 198: 194: 110: 454: 356: 59: 189: 124:. They are marginal articles, and any images in them are, perforce, images in a marginal article. 188:"Hardcore pornography" is a fairly well-defined phrase. Wiktionary, the free dictionary, defines 69: 319: 381: 313: 43: 483: 494: 62:. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints. 306: 214: 17: 177: 172: 302: 171:
This page is solely concerned with those activities which are primarily
151: 132:
There is a considerable cost to the encyclopedia to host these images
283:
For an alternative view on the topic discussed in this essay, see
142:
It is not a good thing for young people to be viewing these images
213:
Knowledge aims to reflect the editorial judgment of the pool of
357:
Wikimedia Foundation board resolution on controversial content
344: 138:, and that is a problem, and this sort of thing doesn't help). 103:
Knowledge should not include images from hardcore pornography.
89: 29: 247:
from the way well established reputable sources handle them.
148:
Many of these images are misogynistic and degrading to women
421:
Knowledge Signpost: "Explicit sexual content draws fire"
77: 113:
subjects should not contain pictures or videos which
305:for example quotes veteran porn actor and producer 136:a serious deficit of female readers and editors 285:Knowledge:Hardcore pornography images/Rebuttal 315:Pornland: How Porn Has Hijacked Our Sexuality 8: 295: 7: 479:Knowledge:No disclaimers in articles 435:Knowledge:Censorship (2006 proposal) 377:Knowledge:Knowledge is not censored 440:Knowledge:Image content guidelines 201:) discusses this in more detail. 60:thoroughly vetted by the community 56:Knowledge's policies or guidelines 25: 469:Help:Options to not see an image 93: 33: 392:Knowledge:Restricted materials 1: 445:Knowledge:Images for blocking 372:Policy/Guidelines/Information 387:Knowledge:Offensive material 257:Knowledge:Content disclaimer 517: 312:Gail Dines (1 July 2010). 67: 27:Essay on editing Knowledge 318:. Beacon Press. p. xxiv. 48:Knowledge is not censored 450:Knowledge:Legal warnings 416:Knowledge:Sexual content 223:WP:Neutral point of view 101:This page in a nutshell: 474:Template:Restricted use 227:WP:No original research 190:"hardcore pornography" 117:hardcore pornography. 411:Knowledge:Pornography 273:List of sex positions 162:Scope and definitions 58:, as it has not been 406:Knowledge:Censorship 199:softcore pornography 195:hardcore pornography 111:hardcore pornography 455:Knowledge:Offensive 464:Page Modifications 18:Knowledge:HARDCORE 215:published sources 107: 106: 88: 87: 16:(Redirected from 508: 501:Knowledge essays 382:Knowledge:Images 360: 354: 348: 345:Knowledge Survey 342: 336: 335: 333: 331: 300: 279:Alternative view 219:WP:Verifiability 209:Reliable sources 97: 96: 90: 80: 37: 36: 30: 21: 516: 515: 511: 510: 509: 507: 506: 505: 491: 490: 401:Essays/Writeups 368: 363: 355: 351: 343: 339: 329: 327: 325: 311: 301: 297: 293: 281: 253: 211: 197:(contrast with 186: 169: 164: 109:Articles about 94: 84: 83: 76: 72: 64: 63: 34: 28: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 514: 512: 504: 503: 493: 492: 489: 488: 487: 486: 484:Knowledge:Toby 481: 476: 471: 460: 459: 458: 457: 452: 447: 442: 437: 426: 425: 424: 423: 418: 413: 408: 397: 396: 395: 394: 389: 384: 379: 367: 364: 362: 361: 349: 337: 323: 294: 292: 289: 280: 277: 268: 267: 252: 249: 241: 240: 210: 207: 185: 182: 168: 165: 163: 160: 156: 155: 145: 139: 122:vital articles 105: 104: 98: 86: 85: 82: 81: 73: 68: 65: 53: 52: 40: 38: 26: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 513: 502: 499: 498: 496: 485: 482: 480: 477: 475: 472: 470: 467: 466: 465: 462: 461: 456: 453: 451: 448: 446: 443: 441: 438: 436: 433: 432: 431: 428: 427: 422: 419: 417: 414: 412: 409: 407: 404: 403: 402: 399: 398: 393: 390: 388: 385: 383: 380: 378: 375: 374: 373: 370: 369: 365: 359:, 29 May 2011 358: 353: 350: 346: 341: 338: 326: 324:9780807044520 321: 317: 316: 308: 304: 299: 296: 290: 288: 286: 278: 276: 274: 266: 262: 261: 260: 258: 250: 248: 246: 239: 235: 234: 233: 230: 228: 224: 220: 216: 208: 206: 202: 200: 196: 191: 183: 181: 179: 174: 166: 161: 159: 153: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 133: 130: 129: 128: 125: 123: 118: 116: 112: 102: 99: 92: 91: 79: 75: 74: 71: 66: 61: 57: 51: 49: 45: 39: 32: 31: 19: 463: 429: 400: 371: 352: 340: 328:. Retrieved 314: 307:Bill Margold 298: 282: 269: 263: 254: 244: 242: 236: 231: 212: 203: 187: 170: 157: 147: 141: 131: 126: 119: 114: 108: 100: 41: 330:18 February 78:WP:HARDCORE 42:This is an 303:Gail Dines 251:Disclaimer 184:Definition 154:" context. 430:Proposals 291:Footnotes 245:different 495:Category 366:See also 178:verified 70:Shortcut 173:notable 50:policy. 46:on the 152:fanboy 265:acts. 167:Scope 44:essay 332:2011 320:ISBN 255:The 225:and 115:are 497:: 287:. 221:, 334:. 20:)

Index

Knowledge:HARDCORE
essay
Knowledge is not censored
Knowledge's policies or guidelines
thoroughly vetted by the community
Shortcut
WP:HARDCORE
hardcore pornography
vital articles
a serious deficit of female readers and editors
fanboy
notable
verified
"hardcore pornography"
hardcore pornography
softcore pornography
published sources
WP:Verifiability
WP:Neutral point of view
WP:No original research
Knowledge:Content disclaimer
List of sex positions
Knowledge:Hardcore pornography images/Rebuttal
Gail Dines
Bill Margold
Pornland: How Porn Has Hijacked Our Sexuality
ISBN
9780807044520
Knowledge Survey
Wikimedia Foundation board resolution on controversial content

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.