178:. For example, the content in the "Reasons for SMA" and "Examples of SMA" sections is speculative; the sources don't actually say that "social media avoidance" is the reason for these companies' particular behaviours. Elsewhere, data from Facebook and Google Trends is cited, but conclusions about SMA are again wrongly synthesized. All of these sections would need to be completely rewritten and entirely new references found.
142:. I think the topic of social media avoidance could possibly merit its own article if adequate sourcing existed. (More on that later.) However, this current draft would require a complete ground-up rewrite to meet the
150:
requirements. While it is ordinarily preferable to improve a draft, the author in this case appears unwilling to implement any of the changes suggested by four reviewers, and has indeed reacted
87:
104:
I wasn't able to find any sources for the term "social media avoidance" through News, Books, or
Scholar. SMA seems like a non-notable neologism created by an editor who
83:
75:
17:
222:
201:
133:
56:
79:
116:
drafter doesn't seem like they want to hear criticism anyway). Honestly, if this were notable, it might be best to
70:
62:
241:
166:
applies. For one thing, none of the cited sources directly/explicitly refer to "social media avoidance", raising
40:
217:
194:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below.
237:
36:
212:
188:
167:
127:
236:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
175:
53:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
105:
163:
147:
117:
183:
I have done a brief reference search and have not found anything substantial from a
184:
171:
121:
187:
on Google Books, JSTOR or
Highbeam relating to "social media avoidance" itself.
143:
112:. There doesn't seem to be any potential in this draft for improvement (and the
109:
230:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
170:. Further, large portions of the draft engage in prohibited
154:
151:
113:
95:
91:
124:
in this draft article leaves nothing to be salvaged.
211:- Too many troubles for an acceptable article yet.
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
244:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
7:
24:
48:The result of the discussion was
18:Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion
1:
223:07:24, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
202:22:29, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
134:21:41, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
106:doesn't seem to get the point
57:04:15, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
71:Draft:Social Media Avoidance
63:Draft:Social Media Avoidance
168:neologism notability issues
264:
233:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
148:no original research
198:
172:original research
255:
235:
220:
215:
199:
196:
191:
132:
130:
120:. The amount of
118:wait a few years
100:
99:
34:
263:
262:
258:
257:
256:
254:
253:
252:
248:
242:deletion review
231:
218:
213:
195:
189:
185:reliable source
128:
125:
73:
69:
66:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
261:
259:
250:
247:
246:
226:
225:
214:SwisterTwister
205:
204:
180:
179:
159:
158:
102:
101:
65:
60:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
260:
251:
245:
243:
239:
234:
228:
227:
224:
221:
216:
210:
207:
206:
203:
200:
192:
186:
182:
181:
177:
173:
169:
165:
161:
160:
156:
153:
149:
145:
141:
138:
137:
136:
135:
131:
123:
119:
115:
111:
107:
97:
93:
89:
85:
81:
77:
72:
68:
67:
64:
61:
59:
58:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
249:
232:
229:
208:
139:
103:
49:
47:
31:
28:
129:kikichugirl
152:critically
144:notability
54:kelapstick
238:talk page
176:synthesis
110:wikipedia
37:talk page
240:or in a
162:I think
157:reviews.
39:or in a
84:history
209:Delete
164:WP:TNT
140:Delete
114:sexist
50:delete
122:WP:OR
92:watch
88:links
16:<
219:talk
197:/tlk
190:/wia
174:and
146:and
96:logs
80:talk
76:edit
108:of
193:🎄
155:to
126:—
94:|
90:|
86:|
82:|
78:|
52:.
98:)
74:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.