313:: Since many lists and directory-like pages may be long, an editor who is considering proposing a page for deletion shall contact the page's creator to ascertain their intentions prior to the proposal. Since many such lists are quite lengthy, it may be worth proposing such a page for deletion even while under construction in order to prevent to expenditure of effort.
163:: The original article may have been lacking of references or other criteria for inclusion, thereby leading others in an AfD to view the page as unsuitable. But the original author or someone else may believe the page has a chance and be interested in adding some references or otherwise modifying the content in order to address the issues and improve the page.
157:: The subject matter may not have been notable at the time the page was initially deleted. For example, the article could be about a person who is just at the beginning of achieving fame, a newly released film, or a growing company. When an article was first created, the subject was not notable, but coverage has since expanded, thereby establishing notability.
35:
98:
180:: If a title that was used for a previously deleted page matches that of one to be created on a different subject, it can be used. For example, if an article on one person with a particular name is deleted, then another person with the same name becomes notable, the exact title can be used. Also, titles deleted for a
173:
will create a page on a perfectly notable topic, but will do a poor job of making it appear as such, thereby leading to its deletion. Such pages when originally written may be interpreted at first as being unnotable or nonsense, when a good writer is capable of writing them to meet
Knowledge (XXG)
374:. Keep in mind in advance what is necessary to make the improvements that would give the page staying power. This may either be improvements to the article itself, or you may be able to use changes in policy that have been made since, even if no changes are being made to the article.
133:
If an article was deleted, it may or may not have been deleted for a reason agreeable to you. The article's creator may have opposed its deletion, and may feel strongly about reproducing it with exactly the same content and perhaps more. A recreated page has staying power
194:, even when it did not qualify for a standalone article. When this is done, it is advisable that those who had an active interest in the page's deletion keep the title on their watchlist because a redirect can be changed into an article while bypassing
293:: References may have been added to the subject. Even if no more references have been added, and the article's notability has not been improved, other changes in circumstance may lead to a change in consensus regarding the page's notability.
328:
Reposting oversighted material is forbidden. Material is not oversighted without good cause, a valid reason to even prevent administrators from viewing the material, therefore, reposting such material is highly disruptive.
406:
for more details). If it'll take a very long time (several days or more) to recreate the page, it may be worth using your user space to do so, though you will not be able to test its viability.
301:: Prior to the addition of references that may eventually be placed on the page, an article may appear to be original research, but this appearance will diminish once sources are provided.
284:
tag. Either seven days shall pass without any significant edits, or else the creator shall be contacted in order to ascertain their intentions prior to proposing the page for deletion.
130:
Recreating a previously deleted page is not forbidden. But if you do choose to recreate the page, you should be aware of the issues leading to its earlier deletion prior to recreation.
116:
198:. This does not mean that the article should automatically be deleted or reverted to a redirect. But it should be monitored to make sure it meets Knowledge (XXG)'s guidelines.
388:
know that the issues have been addressed. If you need time to improve the page from its original text, and you want to prevent the page from being deleted again, place the
416:
403:
452:
338:
447:
120:
50:
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more
Knowledge (XXG) contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of
105:
51:
266:
If a previously deleted article was recreated after deletion for any of the following reasons, its deletion must be brought again to
257:: Words or characters presented in a totally incoherent fashion that in no way appear to be headed to the construction of an article.
427:
115:
for its implementation was not established within a reasonable period of time. If you want to revive discussion, please use
442:
421:
398:
tag at the top of the page as well. (Any recreated pages that continue to bear any of the problems listed in the
190:: Following deletion of an article, it may be possible under some circumstances to recreate the title as a
364:. If the page was not previously taken up on deletion review, you may be able to obtain a restoration via
323:
139:
112:
55:
278:
253:
65:
358:. From these, you may be able to learn the reason behind the deletion and the consensus on the issue.
249:: Blatant hoaxes and other untruths, where the new version continues to espouse the false information
237:
216:
if its reason for deletion was any of the following, and the recreated version has the same issues:
381:
365:
355:
309:
229:
213:
170:
43:
245:
221:
181:
392:
385:
351:
267:
195:
297:
305:
289:
191:
436:
241:
and other forms of copyright infringement that remain in violation in the new version
58:. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.
17:
343:
Here are the steps to take if you plan to recreate a previously deleted page:
368:. Also consider contacting the administrator who made the actual deletion.
350:. Examine any previous discussions regarding the page's deletion, such as
339:
Knowledge (XXG):Copying within
Knowledge (XXG) § Reusing deleted material
402:
listed above may still be deleted even with the construction tag. See
225:
Pages intended to promote a person, company, organization, or cause
150:
Acceptable reasons for recreating a previously deleted page are:
274:
be proposed for deletion on the day it is recreated if it has a
92:
29:
138:
the earlier issues have been successfully addressed or the
424:
page to request recreation of a previously deleted page.
80:
73:
428:
Knowledge (XXG):Alternative outlets for deleted pages
417:
Knowledge (XXG):Deletion of pages under construction
404:
Knowledge (XXG):Deletion of pages under construction
233:
and other writing intended to disparage the subject
8:
422:Knowledge (XXG):Deletion_review#Instructions
380:. It may be a good idea to leave a note in
146:Valid reasons for recreating a deleted page
184:are always recreated following the move.
52:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies or guidelines
453:Knowledge (XXG) essays about deletion
7:
399:
142:regarding those issues has changed.
56:thoroughly vetted by the community
25:
222:Advertising, Self-promotion, Spam
212:A previously deleted page can be
448:Knowledge (XXG) failed proposals
96:
33:
27:Essay on editing Knowledge (XXG)
161:Improvement of previous writing
1:
384:or on the discussion page so
155:Notability status has changed
203:Deletion of a recreated page
270:. Regardless, a page shall
469:
336:
321:
63:
372:Prepare your improvements
324:Knowledge (XXG):Oversight
400:speedy deletion criteria
362:Consider deletion review
119:or initiate a thread at
333:If you plan to recreate
188:Recreation as redirects
167:Poorly created articles
443:Knowledge (XXG) essays
348:Check the deletion log
246:Inaccurate information
54:, as it has not been
318:Oversighted material
238:Copyright violations
18:Knowledge (XXG):RPDA
386:new page patrollers
290:Lack of notability
298:Original research
262:Proposed deletion
128:
127:
91:
90:
16:(Redirected from
460:
397:
391:
356:deletion reviews
283:
277:
121:the village pump
100:
99:
93:
83:
76:
37:
36:
30:
21:
468:
467:
463:
462:
461:
459:
458:
457:
433:
432:
413:
395:
389:
366:deletion review
341:
335:
326:
320:
310:directory pages
281:
275:
264:
210:
208:Speedy deletion
205:
196:new page patrol
169:: Sometimes, a
148:
124:
97:
87:
86:
79:
72:
68:
60:
59:
34:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
466:
464:
456:
455:
450:
445:
435:
434:
431:
430:
425:
419:
412:
409:
408:
407:
375:
369:
359:
334:
331:
319:
316:
315:
314:
302:
294:
263:
260:
259:
258:
254:Total nonsense
250:
242:
234:
226:
214:speedy deleted
209:
206:
204:
201:
200:
199:
185:
178:Reuse of title
175:
164:
158:
147:
144:
126:
125:
111:
110:
101:
89:
88:
85:
84:
77:
69:
64:
61:
49:
48:
40:
38:
26:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
465:
454:
451:
449:
446:
444:
441:
440:
438:
429:
426:
423:
420:
418:
415:
414:
410:
405:
401:
394:
387:
383:
379:
376:
373:
370:
367:
363:
360:
357:
353:
349:
346:
345:
344:
340:
332:
330:
325:
317:
312:
311:
307:
303:
300:
299:
295:
292:
291:
287:
286:
285:
280:
273:
269:
261:
256:
255:
251:
248:
247:
243:
240:
239:
235:
232:
231:
227:
224:
223:
219:
218:
217:
215:
207:
202:
197:
193:
189:
186:
183:
179:
176:
172:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
152:
151:
145:
143:
141:
137:
131:
122:
118:
117:the talk page
114:
109:
107:
102:
95:
94:
82:
78:
75:
71:
70:
67:
62:
57:
53:
47:
45:
39:
32:
31:
19:
377:
371:
361:
347:
342:
327:
304:
296:
288:
279:construction
271:
265:
252:
244:
236:
230:Attack pages
228:
220:
211:
187:
177:
166:
160:
154:
149:
135:
132:
129:
103:
41:
382:hidden text
81:WP:RECREATE
42:This is an
437:Categories
337:See also:
322:See also:
174:standards.
104:This is a
140:consensus
113:Consensus
108:proposal.
66:Shortcuts
411:See also
378:Recreate
192:redirect
393:newpage
74:WP:RPDA
171:newbie
106:failed
306:Lists
44:essay
354:and
352:AfDs
308:and
182:move
272:not
268:AfD
439::
396:}}
390:{{
282:}}
276:{{
136:if
123:.
46:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.