245:
could not be brought into the community. The ability of an admin to delete or to protect an article should go without saying; I mention them only in order to make it clear that I am prepared to do this as and when it appears appropriate. I will also hold myself available, as far as is possible, to respond to personal requests , either on talk-page or by e-mail, for admin assistance.
940:
2292:
In a recent RfA, a potential nominator expressed dissatisfaction at the nominee for not accepting their nomination or keeping them "in the loop". With that in mind, is seems both polite and prudent of
Anthony to ask that another potential nominator be updated. Asking his actual nominator, rather than
971:
For the sheer volume of output on a wide range of topics since becoming an editor, for the tireless new page patrolling and for the support given to new users among other ways via the adoption programme. I think this level of commitment to the ideals of
Knowledge (XXG) means the case for adminship is
2312:
It seems pretty unfair to hold this against
Anthony and it's not assuming good faith. That request was communication with a friend, not canvassing. There's no evidence whatsoever that there was active campaigning, even on a small scale and Antony even notes that he does not want this notification to
269:
status; I tend to write short articles of only one or two pages, which tend not to be considered for this status. I am, however, pleased with the long series of articles which I contributed on the
Ironclad Battleships of the Victorian Era. This was, I feel, a major gap in the naval area of Knowledge
568:
I would have nominated
Anthony myself, but have been traveling a lot recently and haven't had the time. I have been closely following Anthony's Knowledge (XXG) career since I did an informal editor review of him at the start of the year. He is a reliable and dedicated contributor and vandal fighter
642:
Yes, please. I opposed the last time, but
Anthony has since improved exponentially, with varied participation in XfDs and WP:ADOPT. A civil, reliable, dedicated editor, who responds well to criticism, gets along nicely with everyone, has a good grasp of policy, and would do very well with the bit.
325:
I admit the fault. I have developed what I fully accept is the bad habit of often not leaving summaries with correction of typos and punctuation errors, particularly in comments which I have myself added. My bad. I have now enabled forced edit summaries in my preferences, which will eradicate this
290:
As a new page patroller, I have received a large number of offensive edits from editors whose vandalism pages I have tagged, and my own userpage has been vandalised fifty times to date. This has really not caused me any stress - I have accepted it as part of the penalty of telling editors who add
244:
discussions; while I am aware that non-admin editors can close these in certain circumstances, I have chosen not to do so. I am aware of the ability of admins to block editors, and would do so where I thought it appropriate; I would always regard it as a last resort, to be used only if an editor
130:
program, helping a number of users begin their wiki lives, this actually shows a wider tendency of
Anthony trying to help and welcome newcomers as much as possible. All in all, I think Anthony would be a great asset to the administration, and with his firm grasp of policy and guidlines, he would
2236:
Not trying to change your vote, but I think the dynamic is somewhat different in this case. AFAIK Gwernol and
Anthony are close, Gwernol has offered to nominate Anthony on previous occasions, and is currently busy with RL stuff, so I think it's reasonable to ask Ryan to drop Gwernol a note. –
192:. I will concede that my experience in image manipulation is minimal; as there are many admins, many of whom are experts in this area, I would expect not significantly to undertake admin duties in this field until I acquire expertise therein, which I intend to do as soon as is possible.--
581:
Always struck me as a responsible editor. I was peripherally involved when he first proposed (on the pump if I remember correctly) the tweak to the semi-protection policy and I thought he did a good job of stating his case patiently. Concerns of previous RfA seem to have been resolved.
2480:
I think the candidate could really be a boon, but there are two issues that together somewhat concern me. He's making claims about professional qualifications AND canvassing too. If it was one or the other I don't think I'd feel this way, but this reminds me slightly of
318:
Your use of edit summaries for minor edits seems very low. Is there a reason for this? If you propose to use edit summaries more consistently in future, would you be willing to change your preferences to remind you when you leave a blank edit summary?
1900:
I was adopted by Dr. Bradbury and found him to be helpful, attentive and very tactful in dealing with problems. He can add professionalism and diplomacy along with his knowledge to our efforts. I strongly support this
899:- virtually everything of relevance checks out, I trust the nominator, looks like another fine addition to the Brit Cabal. Just so long as you really do slay those backlogs when our American comrades are slumbering :)
231:
My major area of interest, apart from article writing which I intend to continue with, and which requires neither mop nor bucket, is in anti-vandal activity. I would therefore expect to spend a great deal of time in
121:
where he always gives a very reasoned responce to his comment, showing a very strong understanding of deletion policy and also relevent inclusion criteria, he would do great work in closing these with his eye for
2376:
An excellent candidate, if not for the edit summary usage (an issue already brought up in his previous RfA). I'll change to support if I see a substantial improvement in the next few days, especially for minor
2400:
Yeah, edit summary is a bit below average (if there was an average...), but a way around it is the "force edit summary" option in the user preferences. That could keep everyone satisfied? Just my thoughts,
1351:- Overall very good candidate. Would have preferred to see a full 6 months since last RfA, but I believe those concerns have been well adressed now. Give the guy his mop and let him get to work already!
274:
and to the talk page associated with the article (where I felt I had made significant points against
Holocaust denial), although I must stipulate that the article existed before my involvement in it.
2504:
347:
164:-During my previous RfA it became obvious to me, and to the community, that in spite of the confidence of my nominator of the time, I was deficient in understanding some important aspects of
507:
2020:
I don't recall having any interaction with
Anthony, but I've seen him around and noted him to be a courteous and conscientious user. I expect he won't bully anyone or break anything, so I
1440:. Anthony has definitely demonstrated his knowledge of policy, and has shown great work as an editor. He's definitely improved since his last RfA, so I think he's ready for the tools.
1965:
354:
206:
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Knowledge (XXG) in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for participants:
96:
2252:
about his Rfa, as he was originally going to offer nomination, and there has been email corespondance about who is going to nominate, it was simply a courteous thing to do
284:
Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
871:
Trying to think of some GP-related pun to accompany this support !vote, but can't. Candidate's adminship will be good for the health of Knowledge (XXG) in any case.
95:
by profession, and a member of wikipedia since April 2006. In his time here, he has gained nearly 6,000 edits with around 1,800 of these in mainspace. Since his
1104:. Excellent response to my concerns last time around and, as far as I can tell, a flawless record since then. He will do great work, so I'm pleased to support.
99:
he has gained far more experience in wikipedia space which was the primary concern for the opposing parties. Anthony does great work with tagging articles for
2223:. It is extremely improper to tell people about an RfA simply to get their !vote, and to go as far as to ask another user to do it is even more unacceptable.
131:
always follow procedures correctly. I ask that you help me give him the mop, bucket and any other tools which would help him further his wikipedia career.
291:
obscene or mindless edits that this is not what wikipedia is about. I have to date avoided any edit wars, and seriously hope and intend to go on doing so.
2522:
1960:
222:
1685:
In my interaction with he was a reasonable, responsible editor. Can't ask for much more than that in an admins temperment. I trust him to do alright.--
2293:
doing it himself, appears to me to be an effort to avoid the appearance of canvassing. Seems you can't win at RfA these days no matter what you do.
188:
pages. I was able to get adopted (in concert with other users) as policy the long-term semi-protection of particularly vulnerable articles such as
2280:
2256:
388:
135:
1048:
1612:. - Good candidate that continues to improve overtime through an ability to recognize deficiencies and overcome them. What's not to like? : )--
770:
Of.course :) Anthony was a legitimate case of a "Not one already? Wow" candidate, for me; I was totally shocked by this nomination due to this.
82:
629:
937:- Another one who is already a semi-admin, once he gets the lock, keys, deletion tools and all, well, he'll do even better than he does now!
2199:. The edit summary issue for minor edits is, to me, a minor one. Now that "force edit summary" is enabled, it's probably a non-issue. --
1139:
569:
who has a strong grasp of policy and the right temperament to step up to a greater contribution. He will make an excellent administrator.
461:
343:
33:
17:
1821:
759:
539:
I would have liked to see some more article writing, but he has demonstrated a need for some extra buttons, so good luck Anthony!
2000:
1793:
103:
and always informs the editor in question that their article has been tagged, something which often helps newbies understand why
1741:
Great editor and the sooner the better. I have no doubt that AB will be a even greater asset than he is now if given the tools.
643:(Consider this an informal, mini-conomination statement, because I was thinking about asking you sometime again!) Good stuff. –
309:
214:
831:
and thought potential admin advocating removal of notices, was definately an oppose, then saw you corrected it ;). Good luck
1697:, his editing and talk-page contributions in the areas I'm interested in show him to be a careful and responsible editor.
1258:
674:
1373:
1191:
271:
189:
456:
1600:. There is no good reason to oppose this user; and since it was Ryan who nominated him, I have less reason to oppose.
1427:
255:
Of your articles or contributions to Knowledge (XXG), are there any with which you are particularly pleased, and why?
218:
1723:
I have seen Anthony around quite often and it seems he is very adapt to many of the duties that come with adminship.
1731:
76:
2489:
2460:
2437:
2428:
2405:
2395:
2357:
2342:
2317:
2307:
2287:
2263:
2243:
2231:
2203:
2187:
2170:
2154:
2142:
2118:
2106:
2094:
2073:
2062:
2050:
2038:
2015:
2003:
1983:
1967:
1954:
1939:
1886:
1867:
1844:
1798:
1745:
1733:
1715:
1707:
1689:
1677:
1663:
1640:
1628:
1616:
1604:
1577:
1565:
1544:
1515:
1506:
1494:
1480:
1468:
1464:
Good user. There's no reason I can see why he should not be an admin. IMHO he should have been an admin already.--
1456:
1432:
1410:
1398:
1367:
1355:
1343:
1326:
1310:
1298:
1286:
1274:
1262:
1225:
1214:
1195:
1178:
1166:
1146:
1118:
1096:
1084:
1055:
1026:
1014:
1002:
988:
976:
963:
949:
927:
903:
889:
878:
863:
846:
832:
819:
807:
792:
778:
765:
739:
718:
695:
682:
649:
634:
615:
603:
586:
573:
560:
551:
531:
519:
492:
478:
466:
434:
411:
395:
270:(XXG) which I was able to at least make a significant contribution to. I am also pleased with my contributions to
196:
155:
142:
2284:
2260:
392:
139:
127:
1134:
2277:
2253:
2092:
1838:
451:
385:
132:
1809:
624:
1951:
1817:
1042:
754:
165:
123:
2449:
2434:
2417:
2384:
2138:
have interacted a bit with candidate, not always agreeing with him, but always agreeable encounters! -
1882:
1860:
1724:
1658:
1387:
1364:
875:
339:
193:
152:
87:
72:
2503:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either
1948:
1254:
2302:
1996:
1789:
1283:
1209:
1113:
486:- I've seen you just about everywhere and yes, I'd trust you with the tools. Everything checks out -
92:
1914:
1877:
1477:
1450:
1129:
816:
733:
303:
1250:
786:
due to significant improvement since previous nom. I think Anthony will be an excellent admin. ···
169:
100:
2314:
2185:
2167:
2085:
2033:
1976:
1833:
1562:
1521:
1323:
1307:
1160:
959:
838:
772:
691:
583:
549:
540:
500:
443:
2331:
2485:. I mean no offense, it's the aggressive nature that makes me hesitate to offer full support.
2200:
1813:
1702:
1590:
1512:
1036:
912:
861:
800:
749:
666:
428:
1270:. I don't always agree with him, but he will never abuse the tools. A very good candidate. --
185:
2454:
2422:
2389:
2139:
1981:
1855:
1649:
1637:
1624:
I supported him before, I support him now, and with still more convction in his qualities.--
1392:
1352:
1174:
Now that the edit summary thing is out of the way, I fully support this stellar nomination.
945:
872:
612:
599:
2078:
1777:
1768:
1765:
241:
237:
233:
181:
177:
173:
118:
105:
2294:
2128:
1992:
1785:
1503:
1204:
1105:
1011:
407:
1774:
1771:
1762:
1757:
1754:
2486:
2402:
2228:
2047:
1909:
1686:
1672:
1601:
1596:
After reviewing the event I mentioned below in my invalidated oppose, I am changing to
1574:
1442:
997:
973:
728:
527:- the previous RfA concern was lack of project space experience, which has been fixed.
299:
172:, and believe that this deficiency no longer exists. I have contributed extensively to
1780:
2516:
2354:
2196:
2180:
2163:
2027:
1896:
1742:
1613:
1554:
1489:
1465:
1319:
1175:
1155:
1023:
955:
900:
787:
688:
475:
2249:
1712:
1698:
1586:
1271:
1222:
1093:
855:
658:
570:
516:
421:
113:, giving him the mop would be a great benefit in helping out with the backlogs at
2444:
2412:
2379:
2115:
2103:
2012:
1488:
Definitely. I was neutral last time but I'm going strong this time. Great user.
1407:
1382:
1334:
1295:
1187:
1064:
595:
528:
487:
1502:
Support, but urge not to delete too many articles. Obscure ones are important!
2410:
Yes, that would be an effective solution if Anthony enables that preference.--
2239:
2151:
2059:
1625:
1419:
1236:
985:
885:
645:
403:
2497:
The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
2339:
2070:
1476:
Seems reliable. Also his total edits and mainspace edits are high enough. --
705:
557:
261:
I have to admit that I have written no articles which are likely to achieve
1806:
We've needed an administrator like Anthony for a while. A brilliant idea.
954:
I have seen nothing but good work from Anthony since he joined a year ago.
611:
without reservations, fully qualified candidate with an excellent record.
2335:
1648:
since I have seen nothing but good since I first saw him. And per nom. —
151:
I accept the honour of this nomination with due gratitude and humility.--
62:
240:, which would immediately go on my watchlist. I also anticipate closing
168:. I have worked hard since then, with contributions in most aspects of
114:
2507:
or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
2482:
747:
A dedicated, level-headed user who would make a great Administrator.
213:
What sysop chores do you anticipate helping with? Please check out
939:
65:
2226:
I am changing to no !vote, as that is the wisest thing to do.
149:
Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
2276:
on your userpage which seams far more like canvassing to me
1282:
I've seen Anthony around - he's definitely admin material.
1203:
Anthony is a great user who will be a great administrator.
266:
262:
419:
of course! I supported last time, no reason not to now :)
2248:
This wasn't canvassing, Anthony simple asked that I told
29:
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a
1671:, will be great with the tools, the sooner the better.--
1022:
Was happy to support before, am happy to support again.
2273:
2220:
2179:
per above. Seems trustworthy and should do a fine job.
1378:
828:
1318:. Great contributor, much improvement since last RfA.
1520:Ash nazg thrakatulûk, agh burzum-ishi krimpatul.
1947:didnt get this far without being somewhat decent
657:Hmm, I thought you succeeded in your last RFA. --
515:- The big guy upstairs made me do it! Honest :-p
384:as nom - need I say more? Best of luck Anthony
362:Please keep criticism constructive and polite.
1852:good editor, will make a fine administrator.
8:
1380:Will definitely make an outstanding admin.--
984:Excellent candidate; another cliche moment.
827:Will make a fine admin, though I saw this
85:) - Members of the Jury, I present to you
1010:Dedicated user, makes a great candidate.
1907:, nothing to complain about this user.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship
2126:excellent candidate, per Ryan's nom.
1511:V gubhtug ur nyernql jnf na nqzva! --
498:It doesn't matter why I'm supporting!
126:. He has also been involved with the
7:
2353:. I just don't see the qualities. --
1249:per nom. I was sure I had already. —
703:- I believe you'll be a good admin--
2313:be part of a canvassing programme.
2219:I was going to support until I saw
1186:excellent, and now experienced.--
24:
2523:Successful requests for adminship
623:Very good editor. Per all above.
162:Optional statement from candidate
1831:. You mean he isn't one already?
938:
215:Category:Administrative backlog
346:. For the edit count, see the
236:, and at least enough time in
1:
2162:, conscientious and clueful.
1406:Should be an admin by now. --
117:. Anthony does great work at
1034:, there's no reason not to!
272:Auschwitz concentration camp
223:administrators' reading list
190:Auschwitz concentration camp
128:Knowledge (XXG):Adopt-a-User
2268:Might I also add, that you
1593:) 15:57, 26 March 200 (UTC)
1552:(n° 70 / as per above). --
342:'s edit summary usage with
202:Questions for the candidate
2539:
2490:06:53, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
2461:18:03, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
2442:Changed to support. :-) --
2438:17:22, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
2429:15:58, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
2406:07:22, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
2396:03:28, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
2358:05:25, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
2343:01:50, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
2318:17:44, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
2308:00:30, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
2288:00:28, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
2264:00:06, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
2244:00:03, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
2232:00:00, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
2204:20:47, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
2188:19:31, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
2171:17:33, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
2155:13:50, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
2143:09:40, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
2119:01:12, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
2107:20:41, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
2095:13:53, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
2074:13:51, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
2063:10:06, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
2051:04:56, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
2046:. I think he's ready now.
2039:19:48, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
2024:giving Anthony the tools.
2016:19:20, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
2004:18:24, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
1984:17:41, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
1968:15:40, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
1955:14:49, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
1940:14:09, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
1887:07:21, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
1868:02:07, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
1845:01:29, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
1799:20:02, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
1746:19:46, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
1734:17:41, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
1716:13:59, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
1708:11:20, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
1690:06:37, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
1678:02:42, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
1664:01:47, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
1641:00:48, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
1629:22:23, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
1617:18:51, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
1605:16:20, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
1578:14:52, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
1566:13:56, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
1545:09:50, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
1516:00:53, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
1507:02:32, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
1495:00:07, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
1481:23:12, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
1469:22:02, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
1457:20:55, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
1433:19:18, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
1411:18:19, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
1399:18:03, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
1368:17:50, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
1356:11:26, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
1344:09:50, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
1327:06:11, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
1311:05:40, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
1299:03:30, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
1287:02:16, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
1275:01:16, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
1263:01:07, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
1226:00:38, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
1215:23:24, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
1196:22:40, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
1179:22:38, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
1167:21:56, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
1147:21:14, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
1119:21:14, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
1097:19:52, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
1085:19:32, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
1056:19:02, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
1027:18:49, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
1015:16:31, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
1003:15:25, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
989:15:18, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
977:13:34, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
964:12:50, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
950:12:14, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
928:12:12, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
904:10:48, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
890:10:53, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
879:10:26, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
864:09:02, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
847:08:59, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
833:08:38, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
820:06:52, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
808:04:45, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
793:03:43, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
779:03:42, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
766:03:32, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
740:03:09, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
719:03:02, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
696:02:31, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
683:01:24, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
650:01:21, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
635:01:17, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
616:00:33, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
604:00:31, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
587:00:23, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
574:00:07, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
561:00:03, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
552:00:04, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
532:23:42, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
520:23:36, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
508:23:35, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
493:23:33, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
479:23:31, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
467:23:26, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
435:23:21, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
412:23:19, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
396:23:15, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
217:, and read the page about
197:23:07, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
156:23:07, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
143:16:04, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
91:for your consideration. A
2132:04:16, 30 March 2007 (UTC
1636:Will be a fine admin. --
1332:Former opposer's support!
2500:Please do not modify it.
1892:Extremely Strong Support
1804:Extremely Strong Support
1478:James, La gloria è a dio
1154:. Definitely mopworthy.
61:(108/1/1); Ended 01:41,
1751:Surprising: no mop yet?
298:Optional question from
176:, and significantly to
39:Please do not modify it
1092:. Outstanding editor.
1812:comment was added by
353:Previous nomination:
184:, and to the various
34:request for adminship
2274:link to your own Rfa
1962:Nearly Headless Nick
2150:No reason not to.--
1126:. Need I say more?
854:a good candidate --
556:I like what I see.
2459:
2427:
2394:
1727:¤~Persian Poet Gal
1397:
326:habit at a stroke.
2443:
2411:
2378:
2278:Ryanpostlethwaite
2254:Ryanpostlethwaite
1975:Great candidate.
1825:
1797:
1705:
1564:
1381:
1241:
1240:2007-03-25 00:55Z
1163:
632:
630:Please review me!
410:
386:Ryanpostlethwaite
133:Ryanpostlethwaite
2530:
2502:
2457:
2452:
2447:
2435:Anthony.bradbury
2425:
2420:
2415:
2392:
2387:
2382:
2305:
2301:
2297:
2242:
2090:
2048:Heimstern Läufer
2036:
2031:
2001:My Contributions
1979:
1963:
1935:
1912:
1863:
1858:
1841:
1836:
1807:
1783:
1760:
1703:
1675:
1661:
1656:
1561:
1557:
1541:
1539:
1537:
1535:
1533:
1492:
1453:
1448:
1445:
1431:
1424:
1395:
1390:
1385:
1365:The Rambling Man
1363:- no problemo.
1340:
1243:
1239:
1161:
1142:
1137:
1132:
1116:
1112:
1108:
1082:
1079:
1076:
1073:
1070:
1067:
1054:
1051:
1045:
1039:
1000:
942:
936:
924:
920:
888:
883:*sigh* ... ;) –
845:this message! -
790:
775:
762:
757:
752:
738:
717:
715:
710:
694:
679:
671:
663:
648:
628:
547:
546:
505:
490:
464:
459:
454:
449:
446:
431:
424:
406:
340:Anthony.bradbury
333:General comments
194:Anthony.bradbury
153:Anthony.bradbury
88:Anthony.bradbury
73:Anthony.bradbury
52:Anthony.bradbury
41:
2538:
2537:
2533:
2532:
2531:
2529:
2528:
2527:
2513:
2512:
2511:
2505:this nomination
2498:
2455:
2450:
2445:
2423:
2418:
2413:
2390:
2385:
2380:
2303:
2299:
2295:
2238:
2086:
2029:
2025:
1977:
1961:
1934:
1933:
1928:
1927:
1922:
1921:
1916:
1910:
1861:
1856:
1839:
1834:
1808:—The preceding
1758:
1673:
1659:
1650:
1555:
1531:
1529:
1527:
1525:
1523:
1490:
1451:
1446:
1443:
1430:
1420:
1418:
1393:
1388:
1383:
1336:
1233:
1194:
1140:
1135:
1130:
1124:Cliched Support
1114:
1110:
1106:
1080:
1077:
1074:
1071:
1068:
1065:
1049:
1043:
1037:
1035:
998:
932:
922:
913:
884:
859:
803:semper fictilis
788:
773:
760:
755:
750:
727:
711:
706:
704:
687:
675:
667:
659:
644:
633:
542:
541:
501:
488:
462:
457:
452:
447:
444:
433:
429:
422:
101:speedy deletion
55:
37:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2536:
2534:
2526:
2525:
2515:
2514:
2510:
2509:
2493:
2492:
2474:
2473:
2472:
2471:
2470:
2469:
2468:
2467:
2466:
2465:
2464:
2463:
2361:
2360:
2347:
2346:
2327:
2326:
2325:
2324:
2323:
2322:
2321:
2320:
2310:
2246:
2207:
2206:
2190:
2174:
2157:
2145:
2133:
2121:
2109:
2097:
2076:
2065:
2053:
2041:
2018:
2006:
1991:Very good! --
1986:
1970:
1957:
1942:
1931:
1930:
1925:
1924:
1919:
1918:
1902:
1889:
1873:Strong support
1870:
1847:
1826:
1801:
1748:
1736:
1718:
1710:
1692:
1680:
1666:
1643:
1631:
1622:Strong Support
1619:
1607:
1598:strong support
1594:
1580:
1568:
1550:Strong support
1547:
1518:
1509:
1497:
1486:Strong Support
1483:
1471:
1459:
1435:
1426:
1413:
1401:
1370:
1358:
1346:
1329:
1313:
1308:Richard Cavell
1301:
1289:
1277:
1265:
1244:
1228:
1217:
1198:
1190:
1181:
1169:
1149:
1121:
1099:
1087:
1063:Looks good. --
1058:
1038:--Cremepuff222
1029:
1017:
1005:
991:
979:
966:
952:
930:
906:
894:
893:
892:
866:
857:
849:
835:
822:
810:
795:
781:
768:
745:Strong Support
742:
721:
698:
685:
652:
637:
627:
625:The Evil Clown
618:
606:
589:
579:Strong support
576:
566:Strong support
563:
554:
534:
522:
510:
495:
481:
469:
437:
427:
414:
398:
382:Strong support
373:
372:
359:
358:
357:
351:
344:mathbot's tool
335:
334:
330:
329:
328:
327:
313:
295:
294:
293:
292:
278:
277:
276:
275:
249:
248:
247:
246:
219:administrators
204:
203:
159:
158:
54:
49:
47:
45:
44:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2535:
2524:
2521:
2520:
2518:
2508:
2506:
2501:
2495:
2494:
2491:
2488:
2484:
2479:
2476:
2475:
2462:
2458:
2453:
2448:
2441:
2440:
2439:
2436:
2432:
2431:
2430:
2426:
2421:
2416:
2409:
2408:
2407:
2404:
2399:
2398:
2397:
2393:
2388:
2383:
2375:
2374:
2370:
2369:
2368:
2367:
2366:
2365:
2359:
2356:
2352:
2349:
2348:
2345:
2344:
2341:
2337:
2333:
2329:
2328:
2319:
2316:
2315:Pascal.Tesson
2311:
2309:
2306:
2298:
2291:
2290:
2289:
2286:
2282:
2279:
2275:
2271:
2267:
2266:
2265:
2262:
2258:
2255:
2251:
2247:
2245:
2241:
2235:
2234:
2233:
2230:
2227:
2224:
2222:
2218:
2214:
2213:
2212:
2211:
2205:
2202:
2198:
2194:
2191:
2189:
2186:
2184:
2183:
2178:
2175:
2172:
2169:
2165:
2161:
2158:
2156:
2153:
2149:
2146:
2144:
2141:
2137:
2134:
2131:
2130:
2125:
2122:
2120:
2117:
2113:
2110:
2108:
2105:
2101:
2098:
2096:
2093:
2091:
2089:
2083:
2080:
2077:
2075:
2072:
2069:
2066:
2064:
2061:
2057:
2054:
2052:
2049:
2045:
2042:
2040:
2035:
2032:
2023:
2019:
2017:
2014:
2010:
2007:
2005:
2002:
1998:
1994:
1990:
1987:
1985:
1982:
1980:
1974:
1971:
1969:
1966:
1964:
1958:
1956:
1953:
1950:
1946:
1943:
1941:
1938:
1937:
1936:
1913:
1906:
1903:
1899:
1898:
1893:
1890:
1888:
1884:
1880:
1879:
1874:
1871:
1869:
1866:
1865:
1864:
1859:
1851:
1848:
1846:
1843:
1842:
1837:
1830:
1827:
1823:
1819:
1815:
1811:
1805:
1802:
1800:
1795:
1791:
1787:
1782:
1779:
1776:
1773:
1770:
1767:
1764:
1761:
1756:
1752:
1749:
1747:
1744:
1740:
1737:
1735:
1732:
1730:
1729:
1728:
1722:
1719:
1717:
1714:
1711:
1709:
1706:
1704:(squirt ink?)
1700:
1696:
1693:
1691:
1688:
1684:
1681:
1679:
1676:
1670:
1667:
1665:
1662:
1657:
1655:
1654:
1647:
1644:
1642:
1639:
1635:
1632:
1630:
1627:
1623:
1620:
1618:
1615:
1611:
1608:
1606:
1603:
1599:
1595:
1592:
1588:
1584:
1581:
1579:
1576:
1572:
1569:
1567:
1563:
1559:
1558:
1551:
1548:
1546:
1543:
1542:
1519:
1517:
1514:
1510:
1508:
1505:
1501:
1498:
1496:
1493:
1487:
1484:
1482:
1479:
1475:
1472:
1470:
1467:
1463:
1460:
1458:
1455:
1454:
1449:
1439:
1436:
1434:
1429:
1425:
1423:
1417:
1414:
1412:
1409:
1405:
1402:
1400:
1396:
1391:
1386:
1379:
1377:
1376:-high Support
1375:
1371:
1369:
1366:
1362:
1359:
1357:
1354:
1350:
1347:
1345:
1342:
1339:
1333:
1330:
1328:
1325:
1321:
1317:
1314:
1312:
1309:
1305:
1302:
1300:
1297:
1293:
1290:
1288:
1285:
1281:
1278:
1276:
1273:
1269:
1266:
1264:
1260:
1256:
1252:
1248:
1245:
1242:
1238:
1232:
1229:
1227:
1224:
1221:
1218:
1216:
1213:
1212:
1208:
1207:
1202:
1199:
1197:
1193:
1189:
1185:
1182:
1180:
1177:
1173:
1170:
1168:
1165:
1164:
1157:
1153:
1150:
1148:
1145:
1144:
1143:
1138:
1133:
1125:
1122:
1120:
1117:
1109:
1103:
1100:
1098:
1095:
1091:
1088:
1086:
1083:
1062:
1059:
1057:
1052:
1046:
1040:
1033:
1030:
1028:
1025:
1021:
1018:
1016:
1013:
1009:
1006:
1004:
1001:
995:
992:
990:
987:
983:
980:
978:
975:
972:very strong.
970:
967:
965:
961:
957:
953:
951:
948:
947:
941:
935:
931:
929:
926:
925:
919:
917:
910:
907:
905:
902:
898:
895:
891:
887:
882:
881:
880:
877:
874:
870:
867:
865:
862:
860:
853:
850:
848:
844:
840:
839:Mailer Diablo
836:
834:
830:
826:
823:
821:
818:
814:
811:
809:
806:
805:
804:
799:
796:
794:
791:
785:
782:
780:
777:
776:
774:Daniel Bryant
769:
767:
764:
763:
758:
753:
746:
743:
741:
737:
736:
732:
731:
725:
722:
720:
716:
714:
709:
702:
699:
697:
693:
690:
686:
684:
680:
678:
672:
670:
664:
662:
656:
653:
651:
647:
641:
638:
636:
631:
626:
622:
619:
617:
614:
610:
607:
605:
601:
597:
593:
590:
588:
585:
584:Pascal.Tesson
580:
577:
575:
572:
567:
564:
562:
559:
555:
553:
550:
548:
545:
538:
535:
533:
530:
526:
523:
521:
518:
514:
511:
509:
506:
504:
499:
496:
494:
491:
485:
482:
480:
477:
473:
470:
468:
465:
460:
455:
450:
441:
438:
436:
432:
426:
425:
418:
415:
413:
409:
405:
402:
399:
397:
394:
390:
387:
383:
380:
379:
378:
377:
371:
370:
369:
368:
364:
363:
356:
355:November 2006
352:
349:
345:
341:
337:
336:
332:
331:
324:
321:
320:
317:
314:
311:
308:
305:
301:
297:
296:
289:
286:
285:
283:
280:
279:
273:
268:
264:
260:
257:
256:
254:
251:
250:
243:
239:
235:
230:
227:
226:
224:
220:
216:
212:
209:
208:
207:
201:
200:
199:
198:
195:
191:
187:
183:
179:
175:
171:
167:
163:
157:
154:
150:
147:
146:
145:
144:
141:
137:
134:
129:
125:
120:
116:
112:
108:
107:
102:
98:
94:
90:
89:
84:
81:
78:
74:
70:
69:
67:
64:
59:
53:
50:
48:
43:
40:
35:
32:
27:
26:
19:
2499:
2496:
2477:
2372:
2371:
2363:
2362:
2350:
2330:
2269:
2225:
2216:
2215:
2209:
2208:
2201:Black Falcon
2192:
2181:
2176:
2159:
2147:
2135:
2127:
2123:
2111:
2099:
2087:
2081:
2067:
2055:
2043:
2021:
2008:
1997:Chat with me
1988:
1972:
1944:
1915:
1908:
1904:
1895:
1891:
1883:bananabucket
1876:
1872:
1854:
1853:
1849:
1832:
1828:
1814:Kevinwong913
1803:
1750:
1738:
1726:
1725:
1720:
1694:
1682:
1668:
1652:
1651:
1645:
1633:
1621:
1609:
1597:
1582:
1570:
1553:
1549:
1522:
1513:Slowking Man
1499:
1485:
1473:
1461:
1441:
1437:
1421:
1415:
1403:
1372:
1360:
1348:
1337:
1331:
1315:
1303:
1291:
1279:
1267:
1246:
1234:
1230:
1219:
1210:
1205:
1200:
1183:
1171:
1159:
1151:
1131:bibliomaniac
1128:
1127:
1123:
1101:
1089:
1060:
1031:
1019:
1007:
993:
981:
968:
944:
933:
921:
915:
914:
908:
896:
868:
851:
842:
824:
812:
802:
801:
797:
783:
771:
748:
744:
734:
729:
723:
712:
707:
700:
676:
668:
660:
654:
639:
620:
608:
591:
578:
565:
543:
537:Weak Support
536:
524:
512:
503:Rama's arrow
502:
497:
483:
471:
439:
420:
416:
400:
381:
375:
374:
366:
365:
361:
360:
322:
315:
306:
287:
281:
258:
252:
228:
210:
205:
166:WP:NAMESPACE
161:
160:
148:
110:
109:article has
104:
86:
79:
71:
60:
57:
56:
51:
46:
38:
30:
28:
2433:Enabled --
2334:comment by
2140:NDCompuGeek
2102:per above.
1901:nomination.
1638:Scientizzle
1353:Wikidenizen
1294:per above.
946:sunstar net
613:Newyorkbrad
594:Per nom. --
474:some more!
442:good user.
111:disappeared
1993:Whereizben
1504:HumanThing
1438:64 Support
1284:YechielMan
1206:Cbrown1023
1050:review me!
1012:Hello32020
858:(Stephen)
751:S h a r k
367:Discussion
31:successful
2487:Anynobody
2403:Spawn Man
2338:removed.
2229:Acalamari
2221:this edit
2114:per nom.
1687:John Lake
1674:Wizardman
1602:Acalamari
1575:Coemgenus
999:Lapinmies
974:Davidelit
404:≈ jossi ≈
348:talk page
300:WJBscribe
170:WP:POLICY
124:consensus
2517:Category
2377:edits.--
2355:CyclePat
2336:User:Qxz
2332:WP:POINT
2296:Rockpock
2281:contribs
2257:contribs
2197:Bishonen
2182:IrishGuy
2164:Bishonen
1897:Canticle
1878:Blnguyen
1822:contribs
1810:unsigned
1794:contribs
1790:messages
1743:NeoFreak
1614:Jreferee
1556:FayssalF
1491:James086
1466:Hirak 99
1320:utcursch
1259:contribs
1231:Support!
1201:Support'
1176:Gutworth
1156:Grutness
1107:Rockpock
1024:Agent 86
956:Shimgray
911:sure. -
901:Moreschi
756:f a c e
544:gaillimh
476:Melchoir
430:(o rly?)
389:contribs
310:contribs
265:or even
221:and the
136:contribs
97:last Rfa
83:contribs
63:31 March
2478:Neutral
2373:Neutral
2364:Neutral
2250:Gwernol
2193:Support
2177:Support
2160:Support
2148:Support
2136:Support
2124:Support
2112:Support
2100:Support
2082:Support
2068:Support
2056:Support
2044:Support
2022:support
2013:Michael
2009:Support
1989:Support
1973:Support
1945:Support
1905:Support
1850:Support
1835:Shindo9
1829:Support
1739:Support
1721:Support
1713:Terence
1699:Squiddy
1695:Support
1683:Support
1669:Support
1653:$ PЯING
1646:Support
1634:Support
1610:Support
1587:Bhadani
1583:Support
1571:Support
1500:Support
1474:Support
1462:Support
1416:Support
1404:Support
1361:Support
1349:Support
1316:Support
1306:- (Dr)
1304:Support
1292:Support
1280:Support
1272:Guinnog
1268:Support
1251:KNcyu38
1247:Support
1223:John254
1220:Support
1184:Support
1172:Support
1152:Support
1102:Support
1094:A Train
1090:Support
1061:Support
1032:Support
1020:Support
1008:Support
996:okay. -
994:Support
982:Support
969:Support
934:Support
909:Support
897:Support
869:Support
852:Support
843:approve
825:Support
813:Support
798:Support
784:Support
724:Support
701:Support
661:Agεθ020
655:Support
640:Support
621:Sypport
609:Support
592:Support
571:Gwernol
525:Support
517:Matthew
513:Support
484:Support
472:Support
463:veritas
445:Captain
440:Support
423:Majorly
417:Support
401:Support
376:Support
186:WP:PUMP
115:CAT:CSD
2483:Essjay
2351:oppose
2272:had a
2217:Oppose
2210:Oppose
2116:Lakers
2104:Just H
2079:WP:100
1949:Twenty
1840:Hikaru
1422:—dgies
1408:Meno25
1296:gidonb
1188:danntm
856:Steve
841:and I
761:2 1 7
735:scribe
596:Xnuala
529:Addhoc
489:Alison
408:(talk)
242:WP:AfD
238:WP:AIV
234:WP:CSD
182:WP:AIV
178:WP:RfA
174:WP:AfD
2240:Riana
2152:MONGO
2129:Sarah
2060:Zaxem
1952:Years
1911:Apple
1857:Darth
1660:rαgђ
1626:Aldux
1524:: -->
1374:2 IFC
1237:Quarl
986:Xoloz
886:Riana
876:hotep
873:Bubba
817:Denny
646:Riana
448:panda
106:their
68:(UTC)
58:Final
16:<
2340:El_C
2285:talk
2270:have
2261:talk
2195:per
2168:talk
2088:Lost
2071:Dina
2034:acan
1862:griz
1818:talk
1786:page
1591:talk
1585:. --
1540:<
1444:Nish
1324:talk
1255:talk
1211:talk
1162:wha?
1044:talk
960:talk
943:. --
837:I'm
829:edit
692:khoi
689:Khoi
600:talk
558:El_C
458:vino
393:talk
338:See
304:talk
140:talk
77:talk
66:2007
2446:Hús
2414:Hús
2381:Hús
2028:coe
1978:Pig
1929:•m•
1926:•r•
1923:•o•
1920:•w•
1753:--S
1573:.
1447:kid
1384:Hús
1335:Max
1158:...
789:日本穣
730:WjB
708:$ U
119:Afd
2519::
2456:nd
2424:nd
2391:nd
2166:|
2084:—
2058:.
2037:—
2026:—
2011:.
1999:-
1995:-
1959:—
1894:-
1885:)
1875:-
1824:).
1820:•
1792:-
1788:-
1701:|
1560:-
1452:64
1394:nd
1341:em
1322:|
1261:)
1257:•
1053:)
1047:,
962:|
958:|
923:as
815:-
726:.
713:IT
681:)
677:ФC
673:•
669:ΔT
602:)
453:In
323:A:
316:4.
288:A:
282:3.
267:GA
263:FA
259:A:
253:2.
229:A:
225:.
211:1.
180:,
93:GP
36:.
2451:ö
2419:ö
2386:ö
2304:t
2300:e
2283:/
2259:/
2173:.
2030:l
1932:•
1917:•
1881:(
1816:(
1796:)
1784:(
1781:n
1778:o
1775:s
1772:d
1769:n
1766:a
1763:r
1759:g
1755:l
1589:(
1538:t
1536:n
1534:a
1532:i
1530:d
1528:a
1526:R
1428:c
1389:ö
1338:S
1253:(
1235:—
1192:C
1141:5
1136:1
1115:t
1111:e
1081:l
1078:e
1075:h
1072:c
1069:s
1066:M
1041:(
918:n
916:A
665:(
598:(
391:/
350:.
312:)
307:·
302:(
138:/
80:·
75:(
42:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.