2731:
2569:
1034:
2140:
2128:
2795:
1629:
644:
65:
654:
943:
1482:
1984:
3057:
2078:
2933:
2926:
2116:
1681:
1414:
1367:
2861:
2336:
2457:
297:
submitted, such an image will thereafter be reviewed here. Sections are archived automatically after some time when a discussion stalls, to encourage speedy responses from both artists and reviewers. It is allowed to revive sections if they have been archived before being resolved, unlike regular talk page archives.
1297:"First of all, there is no evidence that "Big Al" is not full grown. All of the neural arches are completely fused, and the individual has many pathologies. Of course it may simply have had a difficult life. Until/unless someone sections some long bones, our best indirect indicators suggest it was full grown."
3014:
The new version looks good! I don't know that I'd have given it fully developed, pennaceous feathers on the body, especially if it's not fully covered in them, as those are a feature of rather advanced, fully feathered dinos... but we don't have *any* evidence of ornithomime integument so pretty much
1220:
never made sports for reached 12 meters, diseases can had but are exceptions. If that specimen is not fully grown, we have to put the maximum length, that is average too, people call average size to his 9 meters because the longest specimen found have this length. For example the longest specimens of
292:
This page is mainly for reviewing the accuracy of dinosaur life restorations (usually by the artists themselves, but anyone who wants an image scrutinized is welcome to post it for review). Any other image, such as size comparisons or photos of skeletal mounts, can also be posted here to review their
2539:
This is because the width of the image is not a multiple of the width of the lines so photoshop has to do some interpolating when converting the vector based image to a raster image like png. It's perfectly logic that you do not see gray lines near the borders but you do see them in the middle. If
902:
One issue is that the description on DinoData described the claws as "hoof-shaped", so I'd expect it to have the typical iguanodont "mitten", where the middle 3 fingers are bound together in a single hoof. The back of the skull has a weird lumpy thing going on, which I can't see a bony correspondant
3072:
Excellent job, as usual! One question--the skull and legs/feet look a lot more robust than the thin, gracile legs and relatively gracile snout of the skeletals I have. Is this way way it was in the skeletal you used? If so, I'd just chalk it up to different morphs or interpretation of the material.
1595:
The image looks very accurate to me, at least based on the skeletal you used. Good job. The image itself is very light; is there a way you can darken it? (I can help if you don't know how). Also, I see a few bluish smudges on the picture. These wouldn't be so noticable if the image wasn't so light.
1215:
That's a difference, Shaquille O'Neal is a basketball player, normally basketball players are tall because practice, jumps, etc. And Robert
Pershing Wadlow had a tumor in the pituitary gland, thats why he was giant and indeed the world tallest human. Normally a human reaches 1,8 meters tall, people
1192:
is one if, if not the, most common predatory dinosaurs in the world, with dozens of good specimens and probably hundreds of fragmentary ones... I'd find it hard to believe if we've never found an adult, and the largest one known was not full grown! It has been suggested that the existance of things
1177:
Always I read that "Big Al" was 7 or 8 meters long, but when I read of "Big Al" that was 10 meters long here in
Knowledge I think that this was correct, also because you have contributions in that article, and if that length was incorrect you changed it. But I said "also several websites says that"
1044:
hi, i am not so sure your diagram is acurate, for must illustrations i saw from the allosaurus the proportion (between long and high) was between 2to1 (6 meter high) and 3to1 (4 meter high).so your human is a tic too big. i would said the head of the human should end more or less at the knee of the
688:
looking confused for a while* i think i got it. this one is a
Nanshiungosaurus. it just got the wrong name from the beggining becouse it comes out on the google search for nanyagosaurus. i do not think it is a Therizinosaur. but should this one have feathers too? i actually wanted to draw this one
370:
issues. Restorations that show serious pathologies known from fossil evidence are welcome, but should not be used as the main representation of a given taxon. These should instead show healthy, typical individuals, and not focus on unknown areas of their anatomy. Since
Knowledge is an encyclopaedia
2492:
Looks good. Only the middle gray lines have a width of 2px while all the other ones have a width of 1px. I have the impression that this is not on purpose (brighter colours of the middle lines makes it likely that those 2px are interpolated versions of a more narrow line). Also why do you place
712:
comes up when you search for
Nanyang--somebody must have mislabelled it. The photo of a skeleton you linked to is Nanyang, the hadrosaur. I like the way the therizinosaur images is coming along, I hope you'll finish that one as well if you decide to do Nanyang the hadrosaur. Dan Bensen painted the
2809:
Looks pretty good, though I'm not sure about how 'flexed' the body appears to be. I imagine it's only the tail being flexed extremely to the side, but this might imply an overly long tail in that perspective. Remember, the key with theropods, from carnosaurs to modern birds, is stiff, stiff, more
2529:
Huh. The persistant difference in line thickness has me stumped. Must be something with the PNG format or with the way photoshop does it's geometric shapes. If you know of any way to fix it let me know, though personally I struggle to notice the difference even in the largest version (could be my
1811:
Not bad, but I'd suggest three tweaks: Iggy only had three toes, so no dewclaw; I'd move the thumb spike to the leading end of the left hand, because, like theropods, it couldn't turn its hands so that the palms were backwards; and I'd de-emphasize the line where the jaws meet. Otherwise, I think
931:
Yes, that's about how the hands looked. I'm not sure why such little arms would retain hooves, but I suspect the arms may not have been used for much. Their ancestors had hooves, and were partially four-legged, so for whatever reason the arms got so small, there may not have been much pressure to
300:
Modifications of previously uploaded amateur restorations to correct anatomical inaccuracies is encouraged (including by others than the original artists), but modifications of historical restorations are discouraged, as these should be used to show historical ideas. Modifications to restorations
296:
If you want to submit dinosaur images for accuracy review, place them here as well as links to what you used as references. If you want to participate as reviewer, you can put the page on your watchlist. New images of any type can also be requested by including "Request:" in the section title; if
1278:
sized giant? This would illustrate a range of known fossils size, showing both average size and dubious larger sizes. I do think they sohuld be full lateral profile, not drawn at an angle like the current example, which obscures the true dimensions of the animal and may throw off the scaling.
998:
You know how bunnies and various small rodents are depicted with their palms facing backwards? That's bunny hands, which most (?all) dinosaurs could not do because their forearms and wrists would not turn that way. Thus, dinosaurs were anatomically incapable of such acts as: operating bike
795:, and you did a good job, again, with using color grades so suggest the presence of scales... but, unfortunetly, this is what makes them innacurate. I couldn't support the approval any maniraptor depicted without feathers. There's just too much bracketing and evidence to the contrary. :/
2385:
I took out
Nemegtosaurinae; could have sworn somebody had used it somewhere, but I guess not. It's kind of odd that she didn't use that name, but that's her prerogative. I think some of the Argentine\Brazilian workers are still using Titanosauridae, but it's really hard to say what
469:
provides evidence for some form of filamentous integument being the plesiomorphic condition in
Ornithischia. As loss of filamentous integument is well known in many dinosaur clades, skin impressions and thermodynamic considerations should be given priority over phylogenetic
1197:
means allosaurs never stopped growing, so really big specimens might be really old individuals. However, I think it's important for scale diagrams to reflect average known size, not maximum. Otherwise, shouldn't the human we use for comparison be a 7-ft tall man like
1570:
2287:
is correct. DinoData gives details for two specimens--the holotype, a subadult, at 1.6 m and a referred specimen (not listed as subadult, so probably close to adult size) at 1.8 m. The Wiki length of 2.5 m is probably too big, and there's no cite with it to check.
354:
If an image is included for historical value, the image caption should explain that it is an outdated reconstruction. Images of historical interest should not be used in the taxobox or paleobox, but preferably in a section of the text discussing the history of a
859:
i uploaded the version with feathers. is this enough or do you need more feathers? :) . for some strange reason i dont seem to get into the website with the skeleton of the
Nanyangosaurus. please if someone can get it i would apreciate if they save the image
2472:
I have the impression that the black 1 metre scale bar is a few pixels too low? Also, some gray lines are not straight: they shift a few pixels to the left on the top and to the right at the bottom. I guess a vector format to png problem due to resizing.
2354:
clade", since that's where a
Nemegto-clade would be (and since we use Nemegtosauridae, so I thought there should be something with the Nemegt- on it), and she used Saltasauridae instead of Titanosauridae. Making modifications is remarkably easy, though.
522:
Example: An image of a dinosaur urinating, giving birth to live young, or making vocal sounds with its jaw, all made unlikely by phylogenetic position and physical constraints (archosaurs less basal then songbirds likely could not vocalize too much, if at
2975:
I agree, nice image. Considering the phylogenical position of the ornithomimosaurs within the theropods, it is very likely that they were indeed feathered. No feather impression of ornithomimosaurs sensu stricto are known, but at least one related genus,
2482:
I re-did the grid and scale bar just using guides in
Photoshop so there shouldn't be any distortion. I also repositioned the human so his heels are 'flat on the ground' and not standing on his toes for a more accurate sense of height. How's it look?
230:
215:
155:
2375:
And yeah, Titanosauridae doesn't look like it's used anywhere in the literature anymore, ICZN be damned. We should probably switch over. I don't have Curry-Roger's book, but it would probably be a good overall basis for titanosaur taxonomy here.
175:
170:
165:
160:
2241:
Looks fine to me. The flexed tail gave me pause but there are sleeping/nesting specimens which show theropod tails are more flexible than you'd think. I like the very primitive, partial feathering--jibes well with its phylo position, I think.
1857:
I don't know Cas, but I always thought of Iggy as a big bulky herbivore that eats a lot of food and therefore had a big combustion chamber to process it and big muscles in the limbs to sustain the weight ;) Would a slimmer version be better?
235:
220:
205:
723:
didn't have feathers--hadrosaur skin is very well documented, in specimens like "Leonardo"--they had very fine scales and leathery skin, and sometimes squared-off 'fringes' of skin down the back. Which image is copyrighted, by the way?
115:
2030:
Thanks! However, the black and white texture is simply paper-grain, and will likely show up invariably if I keep doing shading in this style. The blue vs tan texture comes from photoshop and I put in deliberately for the scaly look.
1099:
have this problem that the head have the same or more length than the human. Although that "Big Al" is not seen from the side, showing it with an incomplete size. I have to fix that problem, tomorrow is ready. Eh... and Dinoguy, the
225:
210:
1161:. Big Al is the specimen illustrated in LoH's link, and it looks like it's about 7 or 8 m long, not 10. The Black Hills Institute site also says "The adult skeleton was nearly eight feet high at the hips, and 26 feet in length"
150:
2349:
turned out, so I thought I'd try making a few others. This is Titanosauria, from the most detailed study (Curry-Rogers '05, in her sauropod book). Any thoughts? I named one clade Nemegtosaurinae that she identified as the
932:
lose the hoof. You'll notice the pinky is free of the hoof--I wonder if this was the part used to grab at branches, etc., to help with feeding, in which case there would not have been pressure to free up the 'main' fingers.
1292:"I got extensive access to the cast prior to publication; it's still one of the most precise reconstructions I've done, even though I first did it almost 10 years ago. Anyways, 8 meters tops, and closer to 7.5-7.6 meters."
140:
2530:
screen as well). And yeah. "C. corallestris" is no longer sonsidered a valid species, but I included it to indicate that the larger specimen was the one assigned to it (Headden also did that in the skeletal I used).
1257:
rather than the somewhat dubious fossils which might be other genera. After all, this size diagram is supposed to be representative of the average size of the genus, rather than the largest (or smallest) specimen.
2820:
yep, the tail is flexed to the side but didn't you say earlier that theropod tails were more flexible than you'd think ;) ? OK, I could shorten the tail a bit (or put it on the other side, whichever you prefer).
2540:
the grid was more fine, you'd see the lines gradually become thicker and grayer as they are more near to the center. It doesn't bother me that much, but it was something I noticed. The quotation marks: okay.
1216:
call it average size because there are taller humans but they are exceptions because sports or diseases, really a normal human is 1,8 meters tall and don't grow more, this is the maximum normal size for humans.
365:
Images should not speculate unnecessarily beyond what has been indicated by reliable sources. Therefore, depicting overly speculative physical features, behaviors, and pathologies should be avoided, to prevent
125:
120:
130:
1302:"BTW, excluding the classic Madsen casts that we see in museums everywhere, I've seen far more fossil allosaurs in Big Al's size range, so I suspect 10m is actually higher than the average allosaur size."
180:
2839:
OK, so no anatomical issues. It is a very nice image. Not as fierce-looking as I imagined it. Then again, I suppose blood dripping down its jaw would be a bad idea. It works for me. Thank you, Arthur.
145:
2372:
realistically be called Nemegtosaurinae (since almost the same clade was the basis for the name Nemegtosauridae in the first place), coining a new name on Knowledge isn't such a great idea.
2065:
I know that it is not a needed picture but I couldn't resist drawing the most famous meat eater of all times (actually, I was asked by someone outside the wikipedia community to do it...).
200:
195:
190:
185:
2619:
The angle between the neck and the skull is way too much. There is almost no angle: the upper vertebrae are should be connected to the back (upper) side of the skull. The mandible of
1348:"jimmadseni" is not Big Al, though Chure is naming both new species. So if you're using a Big Al sized critter in the new diagram, if you're going to label it, use the MOR cat number or
903:
for in the photo--the neck verts are higher than the (admittadly reconstructed) skull, which should lead to a pretty smooth head-neck transition. Other than that it's shaping up nicely!
277:
36:
103:
98:
93:
88:
871:
The new version looks great, LoH! Amazing how adding a few subtle suggestions of feathers here and there affects the overall look. I uploaded the Nanyang photo to my server here
624:
1164:. In fact, the only source I can find saying Big Al is 10 m is Knowledge, and my guess is whoever wrote that based it on the WWD show, which might have extropolated an adult
332:
285:
2982:(an alvarezaur) has been preserved with feathery teguments (although the classification of alvarezaurs as possible ornithomimosaurs is still unclear at least to me).
2368:
Excellent! My only beef is the erection of a new taxa--Nemegtosaurinae has never been published, at least it's not listed in Taxon Search, so even though that clade
1003:. Instead, their hands were oriented so that in a neutral stance, the palms faced each other. Think of it as going through life perpetually ready to shake hands.
1045:
dinosaur. Also the image you chosed is from a dinosaur that is not seen fron the side, meaning even when you make a line below it has not 12 meters but much less.
2636:
were just as incapable of hand pronation as theropods, and could not use their front limbs to walk, so not even faculative quadrupedality for these guys anymore.
616:
612:
3002:
One other thing is that the shape of the skull is a little off. It's a bit longer and narrower, with more pronounced concavities in the snout and lower jaw (see
743:. i took me a bit more freedom in coloring than usual. here is . i actually just started and well couldnt stop myself :P. so i also did a less colorfull version
1904:, the upper jaw is slightly longer than the lower jaw...beaks may do the same. Anyway, I've uploaded a new version with a more classical shape for the beak...
620:
261:
21:
713:'penguin' ones as very birdlike, which I think is fine--they're close relatives of oviraptorids, which were very birdlike, and one therizinosaur so far (
2704:
Yeah, though I wonder exactly how/when quadrupedality evolved among sauropods, and what it might have to do with their bizarro, fingerless front feet.
2632:
Agree, though this should be pretty easy to fix in an outline. You may also want to take into account a brand new study which shows prosauropods like
1884:
is heavy and bulky, a slimmer version is unnecessary. And about the beak, I think that the one above covers to the one down, like a ceratopsian. The
697:
otherskeletal reconstruction for the Nanayangosaurus. so i can do him too. should i also do a therizinosaur? the image on the article has copyright.-
405:
Example: An oviraptorid known only from postcranial elements reconstructed with teeth, a feature made highly improbable by its phylogenetic position.
2358:
If people like these diagrams, I'll take requests: just suggest a clade and an article or articles, and I'll see about making a simplified version.
3090:
3081:
3048:
3019:
3009:
2997:
2986:
2970:
2953:
2943:
2905:
2890:
2881:
2871:
2845:
2834:
2825:
2814:
2785:
2767:
2752:
2742:
2708:
2699:
2686:
2677:
2668:
2653:
2640:
2627:
2614:
2597:
2583:
2544:
2534:
2524:
2505:
2487:
2477:
2466:
2419:
2398:
2380:
2362:
2310:
2301:
2292:
2278:
2259:
2246:
2236:
2225:
2216:
2205:
2196:
2187:
2170:
2161:
2151:
2099:
2069:
2044:
2035:
2025:
2014:
2005:
1996:
1968:
1959:
1921:
1908:
1895:
1875:
1862:
1852:
1843:
1834:
1825:
1816:
1806:
1776:
1754:
1737:
1720:
1711:
1701:
1672:
1649:
1640:
1623:
1611:
1602:
1589:
1552:
1543:
1534:
1523:
1511:
1501:
1473:
1436:
1399:
1388:
1356:
1336:
1283:
1264:
1210:
1172:
1139:
1082:
1057:
1016:
1007:
988:
976:
965:
953:
936:
924:
907:
894:
877:
864:
848:
799:
782:
769:
760:
751:
728:
701:
681:
661:
3086:
Yeah, of course you are right Dinoguy. Here, I've uploaded a version with more gracile feet and slender snout. Looks cuter that way... ;) Thanks
2647:
P.S.: Why you Dinoguy2 didn't said me this anatomical problems when I published the picture of Plateosaurus which I use in this image as siluete
2899:
one from that angle. It's a very unusual perspective, although I'm not sure it illustrates the animal in an encyclopedic way. JMHO, as always.
591:
2830:
No no, I agree it's anatomically correct. It's a quirk of perspective that makes it appear to be incorrect :) I'd leave it as-is, personally.
2658:
I guess because the paper just came out now. Incidently, I will have to modify my own prosauropod illustration that I've drawn some time ago (
1012:
Well, I agree except that a dinosaur would be able to open a doorknob - try turning a doorknow with your hand at it's 3 oclock - no worries!
312:), so they can be prevented from being used and easily located for correction. User created images are not considered original research, per
1095:
have a 90 cm skull, the half of the average human size 1,80 m. So I had to compare the human to the head too. Some comparisons like that of
1519:
Grat work! Can't spot any antotomical problems, but it is one of those boring ornithischian things ;) The devonian critters are amazing.
2176:
328:
2157:
Nice pic and excellent dynamic pose. Looks anatomically accurate to me except that the dewclaw seems to be missing from the left foot.
371:
rather than an art gallery, it is not the place for artistic experimentation, and we cannot include every piece of available artwork.
249:
587:
269:
2867:
The best T-rex skeletal pic I have ever seen, compositionally. I snagged this from Flickr, where it is Creative-Commons licensed.
2210:
The tail doesn't look very stiff, but that could just be because it's further away from the front of the picture. Seems ok to me.
1462:
1341:
Excellent idea Dinoguy! Thanks for explain me the controversies you convinced me. I have ready the scale diagram today. Dropzink
826:
677:
is a hadrosaur, you seem to have drawn a (featherless) therizinosaur (which, aside from the lack of feathers, looks very good!).
590:. Images that have been deemed inaccurate should be placed in the Wikimedia Commons category "Inaccurate dinosaur restorations"
583:
17:
2782:
2611:
2416:
1384:
Looks very good! The edges look a little pixely or jagged in full view though, is there any way to smooth them out a little?
1274:
could be done as a comprimise -- color-coded overlaping profiles of a sub-adult like Big Al, an average sized adult, and an
791:
The link seems to be working now, the site might have just gone down for a while. I really love the color/patterning on the
2166:
It's on the far side of the leg. Wouldn't it be concealed by the leg? Or are they less lateral on the legs than I imagine?
613:
Knowledge talk:No original research/Archive 60#Proposing changes to Knowledge:WikiProject Palaeontology.2FPaleoart review
573:
Exception: Photographs of life-sized models taken in parks. It should be made clear in the caption that these are models.
1695:
Well that's gorgeous (pun intended), Arthur. I'll leave it up to these other folks to determine its accuracy, as usual.
1636:
Hi Dropzink - it's still relatively washed out (foreground vs background) and has the smudges. How about this version?
1458:
778:
for some reason i can not access the skeleton of the Nanyangosaurus anymore. and i do not find any other good source.-
483:
Exception: If the range of motion is debated in the scientific literature, as is the case with sauropod neck position.
2645:
Ok I understood how change the angle between the skull and neck. But how I change the strange position of the hands?
1913:
It's too bad that there aren't better images available of the Leonardo beak, which is quite complete. I do know that
719:) has preserved feathers. I've always imagined therizinosaurs as similar to gigantic geese with big claws :) And no,
309:
305:
2877:
It is unfortunately incompatible with Knowledge's image licensing policies as it uses a noncommercial only license.
756:
I like either coloring. Are the differences in black patterning on the heads deliberate? Sexual dimorphism perhaps?
441:
depicted without feathers, since a skeletal feature (the pygostyle) and phylogenetic bracketing (more advanced than
2794:
2180:
1466:
1144:
And there are definitive remains, "Big Al" was subadult and measured 10 meters long, indicating that a fully grown
321:
304:
Images that have been deemed inaccurate should be tagged with the Wikimedia Commons template "Inaccurate paleoart"
1951:. The upper beak is clearly larger than the lower one, but of course we can't be certain that it was the same for
2230:
No, honestly, I think it's fine. We haven't heard from Dinoguy; until then, I think it's safe to say it's good.
1917:
beaks (upper jaw) are pretty long, overhanging the bone end by at least a couple of inches (Senckenberg mummy).
1457:
Was busy doing basal tetrapoda, Synapsida and other critters from the Devonian-Permian period (you can see them
1227:
are hatchlings and juveniles, we don't compare creatures like this because they aren't adults, like the longest
245:
1901:
1469:, but will pop up from time to time with a dinosaur. Here is Othnielosaurus based on Scott Hartman's skeletal.
301:
published in peer-reviewed journals should be uploaded as separate files, so that both versions are available.
2773:
Nice one, though I am not too familiar with the anatomy so I am not the best one to comment on that. cheers,
570:
Example: Dinosaurs from the Triassic or Jurassic depicted walking on grass, which did not exist at that time.
2886:
O yeah, I just noticed that too. I'm going to contact the photographer to see if he'll change the license.
2730:
690:
399:
920:
do?, even when i am not sure why does he has a hoof, with so short arms he would hardly lean on his hands.-
347:
Dinosaurs/Image review/To Do List#Guidelines for dinosaur restorations Guidelines for dinosaur restorations
2019:
That is excellent, Debivort. I particularly like the texturing; the skin really looks like it has scales.
1203:
2127:
1186:
specimen is 9.7 meters long, first we have to verify is this specimen is an adult, fully grown. Dropzink
3087:
3045:
2983:
2822:
2764:
2696:
2665:
2594:
2202:
2184:
2158:
2066:
2011:
1993:
1956:
1905:
1859:
1840:
1822:
1773:
1669:
1549:
1470:
890:. let me know any changes. PS. i am not sure about the hands, the image wasnt clear enough on that part-
320:, but it is appreciated if sources used are listed in file descriptions (this is often requested during
2568:
1481:
917:
3056:
2077:
822:
814:
317:
1033:
744:
2801:
2739:
2683:
2650:
2580:
2139:
2041:
1965:
1892:
1831:
1803:
1717:
1707:
Anatomically, it looks correct, and I like the different angle (sort of a "pterosaur's-eye view").
1646:
1620:
1608:
1586:
1508:
1433:
984:
ey wait, explain me what you mean please.. i dont got the irony.. :P what is wrong with the hands?-
480:
Example: Theropod dinosaurs reconstructed with overly flexed tails or pronated "bunny-style" hands.
1839:
Unusual you mean? Could you be more precise and point to the other pictures you are referring to?
883:
2778:
2607:
2412:
1889:
1050:
251:
2593:. Should be more like 7-9 m which seems incidentally to be the right proportion for your image.
1680:
2449:
based on Headden's skeletals of the holotype and French specimen, and a modified version of my
2221:
It is a bit foreshortened because the animal is somewhat in line with the viewer. Should I fix?
1583:
1316:?). It might be useful, again using the rhinoceros example, to illustrate different species of
1199:
2959:
1977:
466:
48:
3038:
Here is the feathered compy. I opted for short feathers making a fur covering the body as in
2001:
You deserve some of the credit AW - your branching out to new techniques was my inspiration.
1320:, which probably reached different sizes. A small Big Al sized, 7.5 m individual, a standard
2878:
2251:
re:feathering - how you interpreted it DG is exactly how I intended, based on my reading of
1784:
669:
452:
depicted with advanced feathers, since a skeletal feature (osteoderms) and its proximity to
247:
64:
1628:
1046:
643:
621:
Knowledge talk:WikiProject Mammals/Archive 4#Illustrated reconstructions of extinct species
349:
for minimum requirements for anatomical accuracy in dinosaur restorations used in articles.
3040:
2395:
2359:
2297:
The original version of the drawing had it at about 1.5m. In this new version he is 1.8m.
2252:
2115:
1918:
1872:
1813:
1708:
1540:
1054:
1004:
1000:
985:
973:
950:
921:
891:
861:
818:
779:
766:
748:
698:
658:
1119:, but recent studies suggest it really is a different genus. Pretty much all other known
625:
Knowledge talk:Featured article candidates/archive66#Reconstructed dinosaur images in FAs
942:
653:
2887:
2868:
1751:
1488:
1162:
1049:
you can see what i mean. i would sugest you take a side view, like the one found i this
887:
461:
1569:
3078:
3063:
3032:
3016:
3006:
2994:
2967:
2950:
2940:
2900:
2840:
2831:
2811:
2774:
2749:
2705:
2674:
2673:
Yes--I literally just heard about the new paper yesterday. It's a brand new study :)
2637:
2603:
2531:
2519:
2484:
2463:
2445:
2439:
2408:
2403:
No probs there, we can go back to Chasmosaurinae which is used in Dinosauria II.....
2377:
2307:
2298:
2289:
2284:
2275:
2256:
2243:
2231:
2222:
2211:
2193:
2167:
2148:
2106:
2094:
2084:
2032:
2020:
2002:
1849:
1734:
1696:
1637:
1597:
1529:
1520:
1498:
1394:
1385:
1353:
1333:
1280:
1259:
1207:
1169:
1136:
1079:
1066:
1013:
962:
933:
904:
874:
843:
796:
757:
725:
715:
678:
504:
Exception: If the size of the animal is contested or the individual in question is a
1983:
556:
Image depicts a scene which is anachronistic or contradicts known geographic range.
2932:
2692:
2515:
2183:
is an accurate depiction of Compy by Todd Marshall where you can see the dewclaws.
2175:
They should be more on the inner side of the legs (not on the far side) as seen in
1900:
May be or may be not. How do you know? If you look at the skull for instance here:
1578:
1539:
I like that a lot! Will you do us the honor of adding it to the page, or should I?
1497:
Those Devonian critters look absolutely delicious - I mean well done artistically!
1393:
They can be made more smooth in PhotoShop. Let me know if your require assistance.
530:
Image seems heavily inspired by another piece of media or directly copied from it.
367:
313:
2925:
2860:
1944:
1888:
have the beak closed, and therefore it must have the "two" beaks united like this
694:
3003:
1288:
Also, I asked Scott Hartman about the Big Al issue. Relevant parts of his reply:
1135:, but when doing a scale diagram I think it's best to go with definitive remains.
2963:
2919:
2660:
1687:
1664:
1548:
Done! Thanks, guys! The next one won't be "a boring ornithischian", I promise ;)
972:
Well, yes, which is too bad because the hands are very cute on these dinosaurs.
1948:
1271:
872:
3073:
Anyway, really good job on the feathers, and I like the 'rings' on the tail--
2010:
Vow, now, that's a nice compliment Deb, I do not know what to say. Thanks :D
1078:, and a human would come up well past the knee. I'd stick with 30ft, not 40.
2624:
2541:
2502:
2474:
2345:
1793:
1750:
Now that's a cute theropod. Much better than all those blasted sauropods...
1223:
1159:
505:
2335:
1374:
Ready the scale diagram of every allosaurid for no controversies! Dropzink
1830:
The hands now are good but the beak is rare compared to another pictures.
1413:
1366:
1308:
He also mentions that Big Al is getting placed in a seperate species from
617:
Knowledge talk:No original research/Archive 60#Illustrations violating NOR
346:
2978:
2456:
2339:
A simplified cladogram of Titanosauria, drawn after Curry-Rogers (2005).
1148:
can reached up to 12 meters. Also several websites says that. Dropzink.
2394:
and Ceratopsinae now that we have centrosaurines with long brow horns.
1768:
1168:
size. I'll ask around to get the scoop on this confusing situation...
2390:
is anymore. I think in the future we'll run into the same thing with
2179:(which seems alright except for the pronated position of the hands).
1344:
Haven't heard back from Scott but I checked the theropod database an
456:(extensive scale impressions) imply that it lacked advanced feathers.
2602:
yeah, a bit smaller would be better - even 9m was a biggy cheers,
2931:
2924:
2859:
2729:
2567:
2455:
2334:
1982:
1627:
1568:
1412:
1365:
1064:
Woah! If you're going with a 12 m length, you'd better label that
1032:
941:
642:
545:
being used in the articles on the genera, or an illustration of
2589:
Looks fine, although 10 m is a little bit on the high side for
549:
being a direct trace of another illustration of the same genus.
2664:). Pity, I kind of like it :(. No worries. More fun for me...
2093:
It's a lovely image, Arthur. Thank you for including it here.
999:
handlebars; playing a piano; using a doorknob; or dribbling a
651:
is the sketch. i am sorry i didnt post before . i have a cold
308:(which automatically adds the "Inaccurate paleoart" category (
252:
58:
2691:
Yep, this is what seems to be implied in this new study. See
2510:"C. corallestris" is now pretty much universally accepted as
2274:
Here are two scale diagrams, based on the latest two images.
2623:
also has a distinctive concavity, which I do not see here.
1087:
Yes I had the idea that the human is too big compared to an
2949:
It's very good but er... what happened to his feathers? ;)
1802:
Not very good, the skull and the hands look strange to me.
477:
Image pose differs appreciably from known range of motion.
2575:
Here another scale diagram. I did it based on my previous
2682:
But this means that prosauropods can't walk quadrupedal?
2192:
Ah yes. I totally mis-read the skeletal I was using. V2.
2177:
this skeletal reconstruction of the related Compsognathus
1987:
Brachylophosaurus - in a new non-crosshatched style. V1.
1576:
I saw the most wanted images, and i decided to draw the
1074:. You'll notice in LoH's link, that's an average sized
765:
that is not such a bad idea. so what do you think? :)-
597:
1992:
Yeah, looks very good. I like your new shading style.
1182:
total length, not "Big Al" length. And if the largest
2443:, I took the liberty of whipping up a size chart for
961:
Are the bunny hands a concern, as in AW's iguanodon?
490:
Image differs appreciably from known size estimates.
2958:
It's feathered? I didn't see anything about that in
842:Looking forward to seeing the feathered versions.
693:image where they look like pinguins. i also found
3044:. Used skeletal in Peyer's paper as a guideline.
1151:I don't think that's correct, as the largest non-
1040:Hi I'm Dropzink again. Check that scale diagram.
2895:It certainly is imposing! I'd hate to look at a
594:, so they can be easily located for correction.
1091:of 12 meters. But the skull is also important,
949:Late as usual but here it is. hope you like it-
1867:I don't think a slimmer version is necessary;
810:do not worry i can still give them feathers.
8:
1947:of Leonardo are not too bad. Also check out
1607:Ok in a few hours is ready the new version.
598:Click here to submit a new image for review
592:c:Category:Inaccurate dinosaur restorations
1270:Maybe something like the sclae diagram on
567:, two animals which did not live together.
497:which shows it being as large as an adult
465:and integument in exceptionally preserved
327:For reviews of non-dinosaur paleoart, see
1783:
2437:Hey guys, while I had my files open for
582:: Images that have been approved by the
3052:
2790:
2501:? If you feel like I'm nitpicking ;-)
2111:
2073:
1780:
1676:
1477:
1127:remains are about 30 ft long, I think.
604:
340:Criteria sufficient for using an image:
2518:, which is the reason for the quotes.
2283:Hmm, I don't think the size listed on
1528:Arthur, that is a truly lovely image.
2453:profile. Let me know what you think.
2343:I really liked how the cladogram for
1871:was a big, heavily built ornithopod.
1821:New version uploaded. How is it now?
515:Image differs appreciably from known
412:Image differs appreciably from known
7:
1104:full size is 12 meters, the same of
2810:stiff, and practically immobile ;)
1645:Too much better, thanks for help;)
1249:I also think we should go with the
1848:Nice pic. Was it that fat? cheers
611:Per following policy discussions:
28:
588:Category:Approved dinosaur images
541:depicting them as they appear in
3055:
2793:
2748:It appears to only have 3 legs.
2138:
2126:
2114:
2076:
1679:
1480:
652:
639:Nanyangosaurus, Nanshiungosaurus
387:reconstructed with four fingers.
63:
1123:were much smaller. The biggest
667:Err... are you sure that's not
584:Knowledge:WikiProject Dinosaurs
430:Image differs appreciably from
394:Image differs appreciably from
376:Image differs appreciably from
360:Criteria for removing an image:
18:Knowledge:WikiProject Dinosaurs
2763:A recent request from Firs...
493:Example: An image of an adult
445:) imply that it was feathered.
310:c:Category:Inaccurate paleoart
306:c:Template:Inaccurate paleoart
55:Dinosaur Image Review Archives
1:
2279:23:24, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
2260:08:21, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
2247:06:17, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
2237:05:06, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
2226:04:58, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
2217:04:40, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
2206:23:22, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
2197:21:29, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
2188:19:20, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
2171:18:42, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
2162:18:36, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
2152:08:34, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
2100:04:41, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
2070:07:19, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
2045:06:04, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
2036:01:44, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
2026:23:41, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
2015:18:15, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
2006:16:52, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
1997:16:24, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
1969:07:47, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
1960:18:05, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
1922:17:49, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
1909:16:10, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
1896:06:59, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
1876:04:31, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
1863:02:11, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
1853:05:11, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
1844:02:11, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
1835:04:11, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
1826:03:54, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
1817:22:04, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
1807:21:49, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
1777:05:56, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
1755:23:39, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
1738:05:10, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
1733:Agree; great angle. Nice pic
1721:19:45, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
1712:15:48, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
1702:07:04, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
1673:06:54, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
1650:00:20, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
1641:00:10, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
1624:23:55, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
1612:06:01, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
1603:04:47, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
1590:23:42, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
1553:05:31, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
1544:04:38, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
1535:22:57, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
1524:22:40, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
1512:15:18, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
1502:07:32, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
1474:07:26, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
1437:19:00, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
1400:23:00, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
1389:22:40, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
1357:01:54, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
1337:00:38, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
1284:00:32, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
1265:20:18, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
1211:14:05, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
1173:03:24, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
1140:03:01, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
1017:21:09, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
1008:18:51, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
989:18:36, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
977:14:53, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
966:05:05, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
954:17:10, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
1083:15:18, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
1058:08:19, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
937:15:14, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
925:10:52, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
908:16:39, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
895:12:22, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
878:17:37, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
865:11:29, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
849:16:37, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
800:14:46, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
783:07:06, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
770:16:23, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
761:06:24, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
752:04:45, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
729:23:26, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
708:You're right, a skeletal of
702:20:20, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
682:15:50, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
662:11:44, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
2405:(Nice cladogram by the way)
1111:Depends. Some people think
3109:
3091:04:06, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
3082:08:51, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
3049:06:40, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
3020:08:47, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
3010:02:31, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
2915:
2753:06:35, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
2743:06:32, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
1324:at 9 m, and an Epanterias/
270:Gallery of approved images
83:Current Automatic Archives
3015:anything goes for now ;)
2998:21:00, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
2987:17:16, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
2971:16:48, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
2954:09:35, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
2944:08:43, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
2906:03:33, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
2891:22:58, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
2882:21:03, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
2872:20:30, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
2846:03:25, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
2835:02:22, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
2826:02:08, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
2815:00:49, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
2786:09:56, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
2768:07:32, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
2709:03:24, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
2700:02:45, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
2687:02:38, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
2678:10:20, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
2669:05:55, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
2654:04:14, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
2641:00:53, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
2628:23:01, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
2615:09:57, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
2598:07:28, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
2584:00:29, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
2545:22:55, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
2535:06:39, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
2525:23:43, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
2506:23:34, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
2488:23:12, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
2478:21:45, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
2467:11:34, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
2420:02:29, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
2399:01:37, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
2381:00:53, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
2363:23:18, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
2311:22:43, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
2302:19:51, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
2293:09:28, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
1902:Image:Iguanodon skull.JPG
1370:Allosaurids scale diagram
586:team can now be found at
423:lacking primary feathers.
329:WikiProject Palaeontology
262:Current Image Review Page
231:September - December 2019
216:September - December 2018
156:September - December 2007
1507:Too good your pictures.
1029:Allosaurus scale diagram
2993:OK - I can feather it.
2966:, and so left it bare.
2738:Ready the new version.
1158:is listed as 9.7m here
561:Megalosaurus bucklandii
434:non-skeletal elements.
400:phylogenetic bracketing
398:skeletal elements (via
2936:
2929:
2902:Firsfron of Ronchester
2864:
2842:Firsfron of Ronchester
2735:
2572:
2521:Firsfron of Ronchester
2493:quotation marks round
2460:
2340:
2331:Titanosauria cladogram
2233:Firsfron of Ronchester
2213:Firsfron of Ronchester
2096:Firsfron of Ronchester
2022:Firsfron of Ronchester
1988:
1698:Firsfron of Ronchester
1632:
1599:Firsfron of Ronchester
1573:
1531:Firsfron of Ronchester
1418:
1396:Firsfron of Ronchester
1371:
1261:Firsfron of Ronchester
1204:Robert Pershing Wadlow
1037:
946:
886:is the sketch for the
845:Firsfron of Ronchester
648:
508:-inflicted individual.
2935:
2928:
2863:
2733:
2571:
2459:
2338:
2147:For your inspection.
1986:
1631:
1572:
1416:
1369:
1115:is simply a gigantic
1036:
945:
646:
419:Example: An image of
136:February - March 2007
2388:Titanosaurus indicus
2201:Looks good to me :)
1108:, or not? Dropzink.
533:Example: A image of
333:paleoart review page
278:Requested Image List
236:January - April 2020
221:January - April 2019
206:January - April 2018
2802:Carcharodontosaurus
2759:Carcharodontosaurus
2579:picture. Check it.
2040:Excellent picture!
1772:in bipedal stance.
1131:is a possible 12 m
1125:Allosaurus fragilis
380:skeletal elements.
322:WP:Featured Article
116:June - October 2006
110:Old Manual Archives
2937:
2930:
2865:
2736:
2693:the abstract there
2573:
2461:
2341:
1989:
1869:I. bernissartensis
1633:
1582:forelimb based on
1574:
1419:
1372:
1231:specimen. Dropzink
1038:
947:
916:would a hand like
649:
467:heterodontosaurids
151:July - August 2007
2960:Ornithomimosauria
2856:Tyrannosaurus rex
1978:Brachylophosaurus
1964:Much better now.
1812:it'll work fine.
1662:A perspective on
831:
817:comment added by
635:
634:
565:Nanosaurus agilis
459:The discovery of
288:
258:
257:
226:May - August 2019
211:May - August 2018
39:
3100:
3059:
2903:
2843:
2797:
2522:
2234:
2214:
2142:
2130:
2118:
2097:
2080:
2023:
1789:
1787:
1699:
1683:
1600:
1532:
1484:
1397:
1262:
1200:Shaquille O'Neal
1178:in reference of
846:
830:
811:
793:Nanshiungosaurus
741:Nanshiungosaurus
710:Nanshiungosaurus
670:Nanshiungosaurus
656:
647:Nanshiungosaurus
627:
609:
284:
253:
141:April - May 2007
67:
59:
35:
30:
29:
3108:
3107:
3103:
3102:
3101:
3099:
3098:
3097:
3075:Sinosauropteryx
3067:
3060:
3041:Sinosauropteryx
3036:
2923:
2901:
2858:
2841:
2805:
2798:
2761:
2566:
2520:
2495:C. corallestris
2435:
2333:
2253:Compsognathidae
2232:
2212:
2143:
2134:
2131:
2122:
2119:
2110:
2095:
2088:
2081:
2063:
2021:
1981:
1797:
1790:
1785:
1765:
1697:
1691:
1684:
1660:
1598:
1567:
1530:
1492:
1485:
1455:
1395:
1260:
1031:
844:
812:
641:
631:
630:
610:
606:
600:
580:Approved images
289:
282:
254:
248:
72:
40:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
3106:
3104:
3096:
3095:
3094:
3093:
3069:
3068:
3061:
3054:
3035:
3030:
3029:
3028:
3027:
3026:
3025:
3024:
3023:
3022:
2991:
2990:
2989:
2922:
2917:
2913:
2912:
2911:
2910:
2909:
2908:
2857:
2854:
2853:
2852:
2851:
2850:
2849:
2848:
2807:
2806:
2799:
2792:
2789:
2788:
2760:
2757:
2756:
2755:
2728:
2727:
2726:
2725:
2724:
2723:
2722:
2721:
2720:
2719:
2718:
2717:
2716:
2715:
2714:
2713:
2712:
2711:
2671:
2565:
2559:
2558:
2557:
2556:
2555:
2554:
2553:
2552:
2551:
2550:
2549:
2548:
2547:
2497:and not round
2434:
2428:
2427:
2426:
2425:
2424:
2423:
2422:
2373:
2332:
2329:
2328:
2327:
2326:
2325:
2324:
2323:
2322:
2321:
2320:
2319:
2318:
2317:
2316:
2315:
2314:
2313:
2272:
2271:
2270:
2269:
2268:
2267:
2266:
2265:
2264:
2263:
2262:
2145:
2144:
2137:
2135:
2132:
2125:
2123:
2120:
2113:
2109:
2104:
2103:
2102:
2090:
2089:
2082:
2075:
2062:
2059:
2058:
2057:
2056:
2055:
2054:
2053:
2052:
2051:
2050:
2049:
2048:
2047:
1980:
1975:
1974:
1973:
1972:
1971:
1945:These pictures
1942:
1941:
1940:
1939:
1938:
1937:
1936:
1935:
1934:
1933:
1932:
1931:
1930:
1929:
1928:
1927:
1926:
1925:
1924:
1846:
1799:
1798:
1791:
1782:
1764:
1761:
1760:
1759:
1758:
1757:
1745:
1744:
1743:
1742:
1741:
1740:
1726:
1725:
1724:
1723:
1693:
1692:
1685:
1678:
1659:
1656:
1655:
1654:
1653:
1652:
1617:
1616:
1615:
1614:
1566:
1563:
1562:
1561:
1560:
1559:
1558:
1557:
1556:
1555:
1537:
1505:
1504:
1494:
1493:
1489:Othnielosaurus
1486:
1479:
1454:
1453:Othnielosaurus
1451:
1450:
1449:
1448:
1447:
1446:
1445:
1444:
1443:
1442:
1441:
1440:
1439:
1411:
1410:
1409:
1408:
1407:
1406:
1405:
1404:
1403:
1402:
1364:
1363:
1362:
1361:
1360:
1359:
1306:
1305:
1304:
1299:
1294:
1286:
1247:
1246:
1245:
1244:
1243:
1242:
1241:
1240:
1239:
1238:
1237:
1236:
1235:
1234:
1233:
1232:
1061:
1060:
1030:
1027:
1026:
1025:
1024:
1023:
1022:
1021:
1020:
1019:
982:
981:
980:
979:
969:
968:
940:
939:
928:
927:
913:
912:
911:
910:
888:Nanyangosaurus
881:
880:
868:
867:
856:
855:
854:
853:
852:
851:
835:
834:
833:
832:
805:
804:
803:
802:
786:
785:
776:
775:
774:
773:
772:
736:
735:
734:
733:
732:
731:
721:Nanyangosaurus
705:
704:
675:Nanyangosaurus
640:
637:
636:
633:
632:
629:
628:
603:
602:
601:
596:
577:
576:
575:
574:
571:
568:
553:
552:
551:
550:
527:
526:
525:
524:
512:
511:
510:
509:
502:
487:
486:
485:
484:
481:
474:
473:
472:
471:
462:Kulindadromeus
457:
446:
427:
426:
425:
424:
409:
408:
407:
406:
391:
390:
389:
388:
373:
372:
357:
356:
351:
350:
337:
290:
283:
281:
280:
274:
273:
272:
266:
265:
264:
256:
255:
250:
246:
244:
241:
240:
239:
238:
233:
228:
223:
218:
213:
208:
203:
198:
193:
188:
183:
178:
173:
168:
163:
158:
153:
148:
143:
138:
133:
128:
123:
118:
107:
106:
101:
96:
91:
78:
77:
74:
73:
68:
62:
52:
51:
34:
33:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3105:
3092:
3089:
3088:ArthurWeasley
3085:
3084:
3083:
3080:
3076:
3071:
3070:
3066:
3065:
3064:Compsognathus
3058:
3053:
3051:
3050:
3047:
3046:ArthurWeasley
3043:
3042:
3034:
3033:Compsognathus
3031:
3021:
3018:
3013:
3012:
3011:
3008:
3004:
3001:
3000:
2999:
2996:
2992:
2988:
2985:
2984:ArthurWeasley
2981:
2980:
2974:
2973:
2972:
2969:
2965:
2961:
2957:
2956:
2955:
2952:
2948:
2947:
2946:
2945:
2942:
2934:
2927:
2921:
2918:
2916:
2907:
2904:
2898:
2894:
2893:
2892:
2889:
2885:
2884:
2883:
2880:
2876:
2875:
2874:
2873:
2870:
2862:
2855:
2847:
2844:
2838:
2837:
2836:
2833:
2829:
2828:
2827:
2824:
2823:ArthurWeasley
2819:
2818:
2817:
2816:
2813:
2804:
2803:
2796:
2791:
2787:
2784:
2780:
2776:
2772:
2771:
2770:
2769:
2766:
2765:ArthurWeasley
2758:
2754:
2751:
2747:
2746:
2745:
2744:
2741:
2732:
2710:
2707:
2703:
2702:
2701:
2698:
2697:ArthurWeasley
2694:
2690:
2689:
2688:
2685:
2681:
2680:
2679:
2676:
2672:
2670:
2667:
2666:ArthurWeasley
2663:
2662:
2657:
2656:
2655:
2652:
2648:
2644:
2643:
2642:
2639:
2635:
2631:
2630:
2629:
2626:
2622:
2618:
2617:
2616:
2613:
2609:
2605:
2601:
2600:
2599:
2596:
2595:ArthurWeasley
2592:
2588:
2587:
2586:
2585:
2582:
2578:
2570:
2564:scale diagram
2563:
2560:
2546:
2543:
2538:
2537:
2536:
2533:
2528:
2527:
2526:
2523:
2517:
2513:
2509:
2508:
2507:
2504:
2500:
2496:
2491:
2490:
2489:
2486:
2481:
2480:
2479:
2476:
2471:
2470:
2469:
2468:
2465:
2458:
2454:
2452:
2448:
2447:
2446:Compsognathus
2442:
2441:
2440:Archaeopteryx
2433:scale diagram
2432:
2431:Compsognathus
2429:
2421:
2418:
2414:
2410:
2406:
2402:
2401:
2400:
2397:
2393:
2389:
2384:
2383:
2382:
2379:
2374:
2371:
2367:
2366:
2365:
2364:
2361:
2356:
2353:
2348:
2347:
2337:
2330:
2312:
2309:
2306:Looks great!
2305:
2304:
2303:
2300:
2296:
2295:
2294:
2291:
2286:
2285:Huaxiagnathus
2282:
2281:
2280:
2277:
2273:
2261:
2258:
2254:
2250:
2249:
2248:
2245:
2240:
2239:
2238:
2235:
2229:
2228:
2227:
2224:
2220:
2219:
2218:
2215:
2209:
2208:
2207:
2204:
2203:ArthurWeasley
2200:
2199:
2198:
2195:
2191:
2190:
2189:
2186:
2185:ArthurWeasley
2182:
2178:
2174:
2173:
2172:
2169:
2165:
2164:
2163:
2160:
2159:ArthurWeasley
2156:
2155:
2154:
2153:
2150:
2141:
2136:
2129:
2124:
2117:
2112:
2108:
2107:Huaxiagnathus
2105:
2101:
2098:
2092:
2091:
2087:
2086:
2085:Tyrannosaurus
2079:
2074:
2072:
2071:
2068:
2067:ArthurWeasley
2061:Tyrannosaurus
2060:
2046:
2043:
2039:
2038:
2037:
2034:
2029:
2028:
2027:
2024:
2018:
2017:
2016:
2013:
2012:ArthurWeasley
2009:
2008:
2007:
2004:
2000:
1999:
1998:
1995:
1994:ArthurWeasley
1991:
1990:
1985:
1979:
1976:
1970:
1967:
1963:
1962:
1961:
1958:
1957:ArthurWeasley
1954:
1950:
1946:
1943:
1923:
1920:
1916:
1915:Edmontosaurus
1912:
1911:
1910:
1907:
1906:ArthurWeasley
1903:
1899:
1898:
1897:
1894:
1890:
1887:
1883:
1879:
1878:
1877:
1874:
1870:
1866:
1865:
1864:
1861:
1860:ArthurWeasley
1856:
1855:
1854:
1851:
1847:
1845:
1842:
1841:ArthurWeasley
1838:
1837:
1836:
1833:
1829:
1828:
1827:
1824:
1823:ArthurWeasley
1820:
1819:
1818:
1815:
1810:
1809:
1808:
1805:
1801:
1800:
1796:
1795:
1788:
1781:
1779:
1778:
1775:
1774:ArthurWeasley
1771:
1770:
1762:
1756:
1753:
1749:
1748:
1747:
1746:
1739:
1736:
1732:
1731:
1730:
1729:
1728:
1727:
1722:
1719:
1716:Too perfect!
1715:
1714:
1713:
1710:
1706:
1705:
1704:
1703:
1700:
1690:
1689:
1682:
1677:
1675:
1674:
1671:
1670:ArthurWeasley
1667:
1666:
1657:
1651:
1648:
1644:
1643:
1642:
1639:
1635:
1634:
1630:
1626:
1625:
1622:
1613:
1610:
1606:
1605:
1604:
1601:
1594:
1593:
1592:
1591:
1588:
1584:
1581:
1580:
1571:
1564:
1554:
1551:
1550:ArthurWeasley
1547:
1546:
1545:
1542:
1538:
1536:
1533:
1527:
1526:
1525:
1522:
1518:
1517:
1516:
1515:
1514:
1513:
1510:
1503:
1500:
1496:
1495:
1491:
1490:
1483:
1478:
1476:
1475:
1472:
1471:ArthurWeasley
1468:
1464:
1460:
1452:
1438:
1435:
1432:Ok I fix it.
1431:
1430:
1429:
1428:
1427:
1426:
1425:
1424:
1423:
1422:
1421:
1420:
1415:
1401:
1398:
1392:
1391:
1390:
1387:
1383:
1382:
1381:
1380:
1379:
1378:
1377:
1376:
1375:
1368:
1358:
1355:
1351:
1347:
1343:
1342:
1340:
1339:
1338:
1335:
1331:
1327:
1326:Saurophaganax
1323:
1319:
1315:
1314:A. jimmadseni
1311:
1307:
1303:
1300:
1298:
1295:
1293:
1290:
1289:
1287:
1285:
1282:
1277:
1273:
1269:
1268:
1267:
1266:
1263:
1256:
1252:
1230:
1226:
1225:
1219:
1214:
1213:
1212:
1209:
1205:
1201:
1196:
1191:
1188:
1187:
1185:
1181:
1176:
1175:
1174:
1171:
1167:
1163:
1160:
1157:
1154:
1150:
1149:
1147:
1143:
1142:
1141:
1138:
1134:
1130:
1126:
1122:
1118:
1114:
1113:Saurophaganax
1110:
1109:
1107:
1106:Saurophaganax
1103:
1098:
1097:Tyrannosaurus
1094:
1090:
1086:
1085:
1084:
1081:
1077:
1073:
1069:
1068:
1067:Saurophaganax
1063:
1062:
1059:
1056:
1052:
1048:
1043:
1042:
1041:
1035:
1028:
1018:
1015:
1011:
1010:
1009:
1006:
1002:
997:
996:
995:
994:
993:
992:
991:
990:
987:
978:
975:
971:
970:
967:
964:
960:
959:
958:
957:
956:
955:
952:
944:
938:
935:
930:
929:
926:
923:
919:
915:
914:
909:
906:
901:
900:
899:
898:
897:
896:
893:
889:
885:
879:
876:
873:
870:
869:
866:
863:
858:
857:
850:
847:
841:
840:
839:
838:
837:
836:
828:
824:
820:
816:
809:
808:
807:
806:
801:
798:
794:
790:
789:
788:
787:
784:
781:
777:
771:
768:
764:
763:
762:
759:
755:
754:
753:
750:
746:
742:
738:
737:
730:
727:
722:
718:
717:
716:Beipiaosaurus
711:
707:
706:
703:
700:
696:
692:
687:
686:
685:
684:
683:
680:
676:
672:
671:
666:
665:
664:
663:
660:
655:
645:
638:
626:
622:
618:
614:
608:
605:
599:
595:
593:
589:
585:
581:
572:
569:
566:
562:
558:
557:
555:
554:
548:
544:
543:Jurassic Park
540:
536:
535:Tyrannosaurus
532:
531:
529:
528:
521:
520:
519:constraints.
518:
517:physiological
514:
513:
507:
503:
500:
496:
492:
491:
489:
488:
482:
479:
478:
476:
475:
468:
464:
463:
458:
455:
451:
447:
444:
440:
436:
435:
433:
429:
428:
422:
418:
417:
415:
411:
410:
404:
403:
401:
397:
393:
392:
386:
382:
381:
379:
375:
374:
369:
364:
363:
362:
361:
353:
352:
348:
344:
343:
342:
341:
336:
334:
330:
325:
323:
319:
318:WP:PERTINENCE
315:
311:
307:
302:
298:
294:
287:
279:
276:
275:
271:
268:
267:
263:
260:
259:
243:
242:
237:
234:
232:
229:
227:
224:
222:
219:
217:
214:
212:
209:
207:
204:
202:
199:
197:
194:
192:
189:
187:
184:
182:
179:
177:
174:
172:
169:
167:
164:
162:
159:
157:
154:
152:
149:
147:
144:
142:
139:
137:
134:
132:
129:
127:
126:December 2006
124:
122:
121:November 2006
119:
117:
114:
113:
112:
111:
105:
102:
100:
97:
95:
92:
90:
87:
86:
85:
84:
80:
79:
76:
75:
71:
66:
61:
60:
57:
56:
50:
47:
46:
45:
44:
38:
32:
31:
23:
19:
3074:
3062:
3039:
3037:
2977:
2938:
2914:
2896:
2866:
2808:
2800:
2762:
2737:
2659:
2646:
2634:Plateosaurus
2633:
2621:Plateosaurus
2620:
2591:Plateosaurus
2590:
2577:Plateosaurus
2576:
2574:
2562:Plateosaurus
2561:
2516:type species
2511:
2498:
2494:
2462:
2450:
2444:
2438:
2436:
2430:
2404:
2391:
2387:
2369:
2357:
2352:Rapetosaurus
2351:
2344:
2342:
2146:
2083:
2064:
1952:
1914:
1885:
1881:
1868:
1792:
1767:
1766:
1694:
1686:
1663:
1661:
1618:
1585:. Check it.
1579:Deinocheirus
1577:
1575:
1565:Deinocheirus
1506:
1487:
1456:
1373:
1349:
1345:
1329:
1325:
1321:
1317:
1313:
1309:
1301:
1296:
1291:
1275:
1254:
1250:
1248:
1228:
1222:
1217:
1194:
1189:
1183:
1179:
1165:
1155:
1152:
1145:
1132:
1128:
1124:
1120:
1116:
1112:
1105:
1101:
1096:
1092:
1088:
1075:
1071:
1065:
1039:
983:
948:
882:
792:
740:
739:ok from the
720:
714:
709:
689:becouse of
674:
668:
650:
607:
579:
578:
564:
560:
546:
542:
539:Velociraptor
538:
534:
516:
498:
494:
460:
453:
450:Ceratosaurus
449:
442:
438:
431:
420:
414:non-skeletal
413:
395:
384:
377:
359:
358:
339:
338:
326:
303:
299:
295:
291:
135:
131:January 2007
109:
108:
82:
81:
69:
54:
53:
42:
41:
22:Image review
2964:garudimimus
2920:Garudimimus
2879:Mgiganteus1
2661:Sellosaurus
2512:C. longipes
2499:C. longipes
2451:Juravenator
1688:Gorgosaurus
1665:Gorgosaurus
1658:Gorgosaurus
1350:A. sp. nov.
1332:) at 12 m.
1310:A. fragilis
813:—Preceding
563:chasing an
547:Deinonychus
499:Apatosaurus
495:Torvosaurus
470:bracketing.
454:Carnotaurus
448:Example: A
443:Caudipteryx
437:Example: A
421:Microraptor
385:Deinonychus
383:Example: A
324:reviews).
293:accuracy.
181:2012 - 2013
2939:Thoughts?
2396:J. Spencer
2360:J. Spencer
1919:J. Spencer
1873:J. Spencer
1814:J. Spencer
1709:J. Spencer
1541:J. Spencer
1330:A. maximus
1322:A fragilis
1318:Allosaurus
1276:Epanterias
1272:Rhinoceros
1255:Allosaurus
1229:Allosaurus
1218:Allosaurus
1195:Epanterias
1190:Allosaurus
1184:Allosaurus
1180:Allosaurus
1166:Allosaurus
1156:Allosaurus
1153:Epanterias
1146:Allosaurus
1133:Allosaurus
1129:Epantarias
1121:Allosaurus
1117:Allosaurus
1102:Allosaurus
1093:Allosaurus
1089:Allosaurus
1072:Allosaurus
1055:LadyofHats
1005:J. Spencer
1001:basketball
986:LadyofHats
974:J. Spencer
951:LadyofHats
922:LadyofHats
892:LadyofHats
862:LadyofHats
819:LadyofHats
780:LadyofHats
767:LadyofHats
749:LadyofHats
699:LadyofHats
659:LadyofHats
416:elements.
49:WP:DINOART
3077:style :)
2888:Killdevil
2869:Killdevil
2407:cheers,
2346:Iguanodon
1953:Iguanodon
1886:Iguanodon
1882:Iguanodon
1850:Cas Liber
1794:Iguanodon
1786:Iguanodon
1752:Spawn Man
1735:Cas Liber
1352:for now.
1224:Mussaurus
1076:Allosarus
559:Example:
506:gigantism
146:June 2007
104:Archive 4
99:Archive 3
94:Archive 2
89:Archive 1
43:Shortcut:
3079:Dinoguy2
3017:Dinoguy2
3007:Dinoguy2
2995:Debivort
2979:Shuvuuia
2968:Debivort
2951:Dinoguy2
2941:Debivort
2832:Dinoguy2
2812:Dinoguy2
2783:contribs
2775:Casliber
2750:Debivort
2740:Dropzink
2706:Dinoguy2
2684:Dropzink
2675:Dinoguy2
2651:Dropzink
2638:Dinoguy2
2612:contribs
2604:Casliber
2581:Dropzink
2532:Dinoguy2
2485:Dinoguy2
2464:Dinoguy2
2417:contribs
2409:Casliber
2392:Ceratops
2378:Dinoguy2
2308:Dinoguy2
2299:Debivort
2290:Dinoguy2
2276:Debivort
2257:Debivort
2244:Dinoguy2
2223:Debivort
2194:Debivort
2168:Debivort
2149:Debivort
2042:Dropzink
2033:Debivort
2003:Debivort
1966:Dropzink
1893:Dropzink
1832:Dropzink
1804:Dropzink
1718:Dropzink
1647:Dropzink
1638:Debivort
1621:Dropzink
1609:Dropzink
1587:Dropzink
1521:Dinoguy2
1509:Dropzink
1499:Debivort
1434:Dropzink
1386:Dinoguy2
1354:Dinoguy2
1334:Dinoguy2
1281:Dinoguy2
1253:size of
1208:Dinoguy2
1170:Dinoguy2
1137:Dinoguy2
1080:Dinoguy2
1014:Debivort
963:Debivort
934:Dinoguy2
905:Dinoguy2
875:Dinoguy2
827:contribs
815:unsigned
797:Dinoguy2
758:Debivort
726:Dinoguy2
679:Dinoguy2
439:Nomingia
70:Archives
20: |
1769:Uteodon
1763:Uteodon
1619:Ready!
1251:average
432:implied
396:implied
2514:, the
1465:, and
1070:, not
355:taxon.
2370:could
1949:Elvis
1193:like
1051:image
673:? ;)
523:all).
378:known
368:WP:OR
314:WP:OI
16:<
2897:live
2779:talk
2625:Tbc2
2608:talk
2542:Tbc2
2503:Tbc2
2475:Tbc2
2413:talk
2181:Here
1880:Yes
1668:...
1467:here
1463:here
1459:here
1047:here
918:this
884:here
823:talk
745:here
695:this
691:this
345:See
316:and
201:2017
196:2016
191:2015
186:2014
176:2011
171:2010
166:2009
161:2008
2962:or
2781:|
2734:v.2
2649::S
2610:|
2415:|
1417:v.2
1202:or
537:or
402:).
331:'s
3005:)
2777:|
2695:.
2606:|
2411:|
2255:.
2133:v2
2121:v2
1955:.
1891:.
1461:,
1346:A.
1206:?
829:)
825:•
747:.-
657:--
623:,
619:,
615:,
335::
2350:"
1328:(
1312:(
1053:-
860:-
821:(
501:.
286:?
37:?
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
