2090:. If I had to pin down what's bothering me specifically, it might be that there appear to be too few feathers, and little differentiation in shape and size between the feathers on the different sections of the wing. The primaries should form a 'wedge' of increasing feather length aside from the last one which is about half the size of the biggest primary, wheras the secondaries are all about equal length, more rounded at the tip, and at less of an angle relative to the arm. The first linked image is probably the most accurate Rahon drawing I've seen (aside from the reversed hallux and possibly overextended arms), fwiw, down to the prominant lack of tertial remiges (something yours got right from the get-go... :)) Sorry for all the nitpicking, it's just that there are so many really bad reconstructions of basal birds out there, it'd be awesome if we absolutely nailed it for Wiki.
2038:. There's no wrist cause there are no carpal bones! Since the rest of Majunga's forelimb is unknown, it could certainly look different, but the humerus is nearly identical to Auca's. Overall I think Arthur's is fantastic, I love the pose and the coloring. The skin texture is really good, the only other thing I can think of is that the nasal area should look rougher, that was probably a display structure after all. Adding a few squiggly lines or some bumps would probably do it but I leave that up to the artist of course! Maybe make the brow over the eye a little thicker too.
2717:. I figured about .5m length for the tail tip feathers on Utah, giving it a skeletal length of 6.5 as the article states. The femur would also end up at little over .5m in this case. As for the Pachy, the photo you linked looks like Sandy, so 3m sounds right--that specimen is not as large at the skull-only specimens the aticle estimate is based on, however, so I scaled up (still short of the article's estimate of 4.5m, but I'm guessing the authors of that one didn't have Sandy's proportions in mind. No other postcranial Pachy remains are known, afaik.
1049:
65:
2636:
2120:
1494:
643:
1173:
2108:
2451:
1129:
1624:
2534:
1940:
2592:
1852:
1273:
2654:
1816:
1972:
1289:
2645:
1956:
1903:
930:
2679:. Pachy was tricky, since it's only known from the skull, and I couldn't find any refs for skull length other than generally about half a meter. The proportions of Mallon's illustration give a length less than the estimated 4.6m listed in the article, but those are probably based on assumptions of a longer tail apparently not supported by the Triebold specimen...
2442:
1722:
1995:
as digit 2, as in related species. With the wing proportions and the 'short' feathers elsewhere on the body (see again Micro, that thing had feather contours like a pigeon, with very thick feathering in the neck and breast at least), it doesn't strike me as an animal that could fly or at least glide. You might even consider feathering digit 1, as in
297:
submitted, such an image will thereafter be reviewed here. Sections are archived automatically after some time when a discussion stalls, to encourage speedy responses from both artists and reviewers. It is allowed to revive sections if they have been archived before being resolved, unlike regular talk page archives.
2315:
Thanks for useing my image :) Sorry to keep this going but i think you've scaled bruhath abit big scaling
Carpenters Argentino to have a 2m tibia it comes out about 7.5m tall. Yours seems about 8-8.5m tall. Im also worried about sauroposiden being abit large, see the image i posted above. The artical
2283:
Few different verisons--let me know which one you like best. I've also added
Bruhathkay, and used Steve's Bru drawing for a re-scale of Argentino. Oddly enough the tibia length is exactly the same as in Carpenter's, but the overall proportions seem a bit more realistic to me, rather than scaling up a
2258:
Small problem with image, is that it's hard to compare which of the smaller ones are larger. For instance, the orange vs the green. Maybe it's intended that way, but I saw the image on commons listed as a "comparison chart", yet I can't compare most in the picture (althougth it's clear the red one is
292:
This page is mainly for reviewing the accuracy of dinosaur life restorations (usually by the artists themselves, but anyone who wants an image scrutinized is welcome to post it for review). Any other image, such as size comparisons or photos of skeletal mounts, can also be posted here to review their
2712:
I agree the tail looks a bit short for Iggy, but all the other proportions came out about right, and that's the best side-view available on
Commons. Trying to lengthen the tail comes out dodgy... Maybe Arthur can post the original refs he used, to check on this? They don't seem to be provided on the
2689:
They look good, i dont know why but
Iguanodons tail looks slightly stumpy, it doesn't in Arthurs origanal and i don't think you've altered it? Its probably that Arthurs' drawing has some persective on it. In silluete, it makes it look alot larger than a 10m specimin would probably be, based of GSPs
2462:
but I think it looks good. As far as
Majunga, that is an amazing headshot. The only thing I can really think of is that the raised area on the back of the skull was for muscle attachment, so it wouldn't have looked like a crest as in that image. If you make the neck taller, so that it is continuous
2389:
It looks like the foreground hand is flexed laterally towards the viewer, is that what you mean? I'm pretty sure that would have been possible, as I've seen knowledgable people use a similar 'semi-tripping' pose with one hand on the ground. Especially for ornithomimids, which I think had an unusual
1994:
would likely have even larger, more 'modern' wings than these species, which already were hard to distinguish from modern bird wings). In your drawing, it looks like they stem from the wrist, or even the joint between digits 1 and 2. I'd also expect the largest feathers to be at least twice as long
370:
issues. Restorations that show serious pathologies known from fossil evidence are welcome, but should not be used as the main representation of a given taxon. These should instead show healthy, typical individuals, and not focus on unknown areas of their anatomy. Since
Knowledge is an encyclopaedia
1708:
I was itching to be bold with this smaller tyrannosaurid and have it feathered but finally choose to stick with the classic big theropod scaly rendering that we already have for
Gorgosaurus, Daspletosaurus, Tarbosaurus and Albertosaurus illustrations. I could make a feathered version later though.
1435:
Although this is probably just me & it doesn't really affect the trueness of the picture, Anatotitan's stance looks like an optical illusion - the front half of the body seems to be at a different angle to the back half & the third leg looks a bit weird too. Could this be fixed? The other
300:
Modifications of previously uploaded amateur restorations to correct anatomical inaccuracies is encouraged (including by others than the original artists), but modifications of historical restorations are discouraged, as these should be used to show historical ideas. Modifications to restorations
296:
If you want to submit dinosaur images for accuracy review, place them here as well as links to what you used as references. If you want to participate as reviewer, you can put the page on your watchlist. New images of any type can also be requested by including "Request:" in the section title; if
2142:
in the theropod diagram, so I opted to leave it out). One thing that still strikes me as wonky is Ken
Carpenter's argentinosaur reconstruction... if anybody has a titanosaur image with more normal head/neck proportions, as long as it matches proportions of known elements, I'd like to replace it.
2246:
I did a diagram last night to scale all the reconstrcutions to known bone measurments (im not saying we use this). Argentinosuaurs 1.55m femur, Paraititan 1.68m humerus, Bruhathkayosaurus 2m tibia, Antarcosuarus 2.35m femur, Supersaurus and diplodicus are scaled to the sizes
Hartman drew them.
2083:
Big improvement on
Rahonavis anatomically, though the wings still don't seem 'full' to me, the feathers don't form a consistant plane, so it looks more like something that's lost its aerial ability (granted this is all inference! Who knows if the thing could really fly, but that seems to be the
807:
This is based of the two drawings in the Brown paper. The top doesn't quite match the side view so there may be some problems. Also I’m not shore were, and how big the eye ball should be? Where it is know is one of the few places I could fit it (At its current size). The final version would be
2337:
Cool I thought Sauro looked way too big (we may have to scale down the image currently in the taxobox there as well). I used the scale bar in your drawing when scaling Bru actually, but the smaller version isn't drastically smaller in size, so I might have bungled the initial scale adjustment
2162:
Looks good. By wonky do do you mean neck to tail ratio. I resently found a skeletal reconsrtuction online for saltasaurus and it does seem to have a really short neck and long tail. It was on a website called dinoweb i would post a link but i tried once before and they didn't like it.
1205:
It's really awesome! But there is another error, in the name "Procheneosaurus cranibrevis", is separated by two spaces, not by one. You will say that it is unnecesary but the text on the image is also important. When fix the cheeks of this version remember to erase that space. Cheers.
2693:
For utahraptor the artical says 6.5m, The only measurment I have hered of is 565mm for a femur, scaling GSP Deinonychus I also get about 6.5m (small difference i know). Scaling Jaime Headdens' Achillobator I get 6m. However the tail feathers might artifically add a little length
2729:(the image didn't come with a scale bar, the one in the image is what i think is the approximate size of a 10m Iguano, ive imageined the head and neck staightened out). Iguanos tail isn't that long anyway but i think Arthurs is turned away from camera making it look shorter.
1514:
Great! Two things, the neck on the right one looks a bit thin, but I'll wait until someone with more anatomical dino knowledge adjudicates on it. The beak on the left one looks a bit wide open and I got confuse for a minute that it was a black band across the nose. cheers,
469:
provides evidence for some form of filamentous integument being the plesiomorphic condition in Ornithischia. As loss of filamentous integument is well known in many dinosaur clades, skin impressions and thermodynamic considerations should be given priority over phylogenetic
2026:
is the official one from the recent monograph. They haven't found anything of Majunga's forelimb except the humerus yet but even there you can see it's way bigger. Can't prove it but I think the forearm should probably be a bit stubbier... the radius and ulna of
354:
If an image is included for historical value, the image caption should explain that it is an outdated reconstruction. Images of historical interest should not be used in the taxobox or paleobox, but preferably in a section of the text discussing the history of a
522:
Example: An image of a dinosaur urinating, giving birth to live young, or making vocal sounds with its jaw, all made unlikely by phylogenetic position and physical constraints (archosaurs less basal then songbirds likely could not vocalize too much, if at
2483:
Agree on the Majung muscle attatchment, otherwise it looks great. And the new Rahon is phenomenal! Improved not only in accuracy but in style, in my opinion. Love the new pose, very dynamic, rather than the stereotypical GSP-style running theropod.
230:
215:
155:
175:
170:
165:
160:
1758:
Much better, sorry to be picky, but the back leg seems a bit straight aswell, on Dinoforum Scott Hartman often comments on the straightness of dinosaur knees and how they're often disarticulated. Maybe the shin could be rotated in abit to fix
1607:
This looks amazing! I don't see how the neck could be made any thicker, anatomically, unless you went with that old "entire frill incorporated into neck muscles" idea, which was wrong. The big fenestrae are there to make it nice and light.
2009:
I agree with Dinoguy about the feathers, i love the colouring on Rahonavis! I can't comment on utahraptor as i can find any skeletal reconstructions. I dont know how much as been found. Majungasaurus looks good this is Ville Sinkkonen's
235:
220:
205:
2714:
2229:
scaled after Carpenter, tohugh I do think they seem a bit too big... I tried scalin Sauro back so it matched the 29m length we have listed (Carpenter's was about 35m), but the larger one actually more closely matched the image on the
1447:
I think I know why the image looks like an illusion - the patch of unshaded belly just to the right of the knee. This part would be shaded by the width of the torso and the leg, and left bright it seems to recede deeper than the leg.
135:
115:
225:
210:
1390:
Anatotitan finalized. Will work on Kritosaurus tomorrow if I have time (btw I've received your scan, thanks!). What the status about the hypothesis of the crest supporting a flap of skin that could be inflated to create sound?
2359:
Much better thanks, I have just found the sauro paper. The paper says the centrum length is 1,250mm with an overall length of 1,400mm, Carpenter mush have scaled the vertebra 'centrum' to be 1.4m acidently making it larger.
140:
1990:. The longest, primary feathers should extend all the way down digit 2, forming a proper wing, probably even moreso than in microraptorians given the prominant quill knobs seen in Rahon but not in Micro or Archie (i.e.,
2176:. Considering that the neck and tail arn't known for Argentinosaurus you could make a note somwhere that it's reconstructed after saltasaurus. Also it be nice to see the end of the tail on diplodicus and supersaurus.
1595:
i made the color a bit more bright and made the neck thicker, but still i can not make it much more. since the other models dont show it this way. plus considering the 2 huge holes on the crest it can not be that
365:
Images should not speculate unnecessarily beyond what has been indicated by reliable sources. Therefore, depicting overly speculative physical features, behaviors, and pathologies should be avoided, to prevent
1911:
Looks great! All positive evdence says "not feathered", but I think the feathers are ok the way you have them, at least if you subscribe to the idea that feathers arose for display rather than for insulation.
1559:
I agree that the neck is too thin - I thought that when I saw it and found others had seen it also, so yeah, neck too thin. Other than that the picture seems alright. You always do great pictures though... :)
125:
120:
130:
1191:
that would look cool. :) Two questions: Is there enough space to include the proposed "juvenile/female/male" tags (all three on the left juvie, and the two clavinitialis female); and, as you did with your
180:
2473:
For clarification, I am not talking about the crest above the eye, but the one behind it right before the neck starts. Check out the silhouette in the full body image I posted to see how it should look.
2316:
says the largest vert was 1.2m. scaling Carpenters drawing to have a vert that isze it comes out at about 6.5m tall to the top of the back. But i want to check for other reconstructions for comparison.
1730:
Looks good, the only thing i can see is the the back leg behind the body. It might be an illustion but it makes the animals hip area look really wide. Tyrannosaurs have much narrower hips from what ive
649:
just the s6tart it takes much longer to make it svg, but i thing it is better so, please make as much correcttions as you want, from all i know the sizes are not right. i will work with the other heads
1986:
Overall, great work as usual Arthur! I love the pebbly texture of the Majung, matches carnotaur skin impressions well. Can't see any problems with Utah either. The only issue I can see is the wing of
2297:
I like the lined up version a lot - it looks like they are about to race. If we use that one, would you mind bending the purple tail up a bit so that we can be sure we are seeing the very end of it.
145:
686:
The wikimedia server is buggy with svgs. For me, I can see it as a thumb, but not on its image page, but when I click the empty space of the image page, I can see the full size version just fine.
2247:
Sauroposeidon is scaled to have 1.2m neck vertebra. Interestingly it comes out at only 25m? (the siluet could be wrong). The GSP Brachiosaurus is scaled to the scale bar that came with it.
1366:: The left leg is throwing me a bit, because it looks like a profile while the rest of it looks like a shallow angle to the viewer. If the leg was turned a bit, it would all go together.
200:
195:
190:
185:
660:
They look great of course! I can't evaluate them technically though. I have a question though - what motivated this selection of genera? For example, why other famous ceratopsids like
277:
36:
103:
98:
93:
88:
1548:
are too slenders compared to his giant frills, in my opinion the creatures strongly resemble hatchlings... how can a 5-meter-long ceratopsian dinosaur had that kind of anatomy?
2047:
New version of Rahonavis and Majungasaurus uploaded. For Majunga, modifications done on the head do not really show at this scale, may be I should consider drawing a headshot.
624:
1413:
The new lanbeosaurus pick is awsome and these look good too, cant really review them properly, im in a foragin country and it costs money to use internet. 2mins remaining ahh
1671:
great, although im wondering about the angle of the neck, i dont know how much mobility there would be in this animal? Would it be possible to lower/rotate the neck slightly?
1146:
Fantastic! I can't see any inacuracies, Maybe you could label them, with their origanal and genus speices names and what their currently thought to be eg male, female, juvi.
332:
285:
2463:
with the top of the raised area, that would be more accurate. The neck was really thick in this and other abelisaurids. But overall I could not be more pleased. Thanks!!!
2328:. Sadly it doesn't have a scale bar. But roughly scaling the image to the human (asuming its about 1.80m) it also comes out at about 6.5m tall (to the top of the back).
2153:
What's your thinking about Sauroposeidon? My initial illustrative response is that it should be included even if it hurts the composition, to make the image inclusive.
1327:, and right in front of the eyes. That's kind of vague, so if you like, I can scan in some Krito skull reconstructions, and I won't even try to convince you that K=
1584:
Hmmm... The neck still seems a bit to thin for the crest. Also, the colour is a bit dark & obscures detail, especially in the forward facing dinosaur. Cheers,
616:
612:
811:. From what I know hadrosaurs have small regular pebbly skin, Does anyone have a an idea of how big the scales should be. Once done It could also be animated.
738:
The text would be almost illegible when in articles. Consider numbering them and leaving the key on the description page so that it can be placed in captions?
620:
261:
21:
2377:
This is a work in progress, based proportionally of Hartmans skeletal, I'm wondering about the oriantation of the hands, is the pose they're in possible?
749:
i will place this project in waiting list, i dont seem to get enough information on all the animals. so i will go back to drawing individual dinosaurs-
405:
Example: An oviraptorid known only from postcranial elements reconstructed with teeth, a feature made highly improbable by its phylogenetic position.
937:
It looks very good, except the neck structures should be longer than tall. If you'd like, I'll scan in a photo that shows them and send it to you.
727:
it is a non finished work, it is not that i chosed just few heads. also it should show now. still i will make a jpg version and post the link here -
2013:, It looks quite bazzar with short legs and small feet. Aparently this is put togethter from 3 individulas so there may be some error. Great work.
677:
judging by the thumbnail it looks good but for some reason my computer can't recognise the file type svg? so sadly i can't see the larger version.
1535:
Looks good, i agree about the thickness of the ncek, maybe the brow horns should be longer (have more horn) im not shure how much longer though.
2751:
2742:
2733:
2721:
2707:
2683:
2619:
2606:
2583:
2564:
2555:
2545:
2510:
2501:
2492:
2478:
2467:
2433:
2414:
2403:
2394:
2383:
2364:
2342:
2332:
2320:
2310:
2301:
2292:
2278:
2269:
2253:
2239:
2209:
2195:
2180:
2167:
2157:
2147:
2094:
2069:
2060:
2051:
2042:
2017:
2003:
1931:
1916:
1894:
1873:
1864:
1860:
Somthing really naturalistic about this one. This dino seems quite new, i can only find a few drawings online but yours seems to match. Great.
1843:
1828:
1807:
1790:
1778:
1763:
1753:
1744:
1735:
1713:
1695:
1686:
1675:
1662:
1651:
1637:
1612:
1600:
1588:
1577:
1564:
1552:
1539:
1530:
1508:
1476:
1463:
1452:
1440:
1430:
1417:
1408:
1395:
1383:
1370:
1352:
1339:
1264:
1245:
1236:
1227:
1210:
1200:
1159:
1150:
1141:
1120:
1103:
1094:
1076:
1023:
1014:
1005:
996:
987:
978:
969:
960:
951:
941:
921:
892:
883:
874:
865:
856:
845:
836:
827:
817:
784:
775:
753:
742:
731:
710:
699:
695:
When i click the empty space it asks to open or save the file, if i save it, none of the programs i have can view it? not even photoshop CS2 ?
690:
681:
672:
654:
591:
2600:
Excelent drawing! Im struggling to find any skeletal reference (or any reference for that matter) however so i cant tell how accurate it is.
2200:
Acually, I think Carpenter scaled argentinosaurus too large. The tibia is ment to be 1.55m. This is what i get if that measurment is correct
312:), so they can be prevented from being used and easily located for correction. User created images are not considered original research, per
328:
371:
rather than an art gallery, it is not the place for artistic experimentation, and we cannot include every piece of available artwork.
587:
269:
249:
2690:
comes out closer to 3m to the top of the back, in that sort of pose. But the artical mentions the possiblity of larger specimins.
590:. Images that have been deemed inaccurate should be placed in the Wikimedia Commons category "Inaccurate dinosaur restorations"
2187:
Looks good, though I'd prefer it if the tails were included. The diagram shows the longest sauropods, but doesn't show exactly
583:
17:
1526:
812:
771:
1348:
Yep, I'd like to get these scans as I was unable to find any up-to-date skull reconstruction for this critter on the web.
613:
Knowledge talk:No original research/Archive 60#Proposing changes to Knowledge:WikiProject Palaeontology.2FPaleoart review
573:
Exception: Photographs of life-sized models taken in parks. It should be made clear in the caption that these are models.
2119:
760:
Wow, great illustration. Maybe good to split into centrosaurines and chasmosaurines, or have as a mega image. cheers,
1500:
now, there is an image in the article. but i found this amazing picture of the skeleton that i really "had" to do it.
483:
Exception: If the range of motion is debated in the scientific literature, as is the case with sauropod neck position.
1116:
Here is a draft. Please note that the different heads are not on scale yet (will do in the final version). Comments?
309:
305:
851:
441:
depicted without feathers, since a skeletal feature (the pygostyle) and phylogenetic bracketing (more advanced than
321:
304:
Images that have been deemed inaccurate should be tagged with the Wikimedia Commons template "Inaccurate paleoart"
2698:
1400:
I haven't heard much about it in recent papers, but no one has said anything against it either. It was still in
245:
301:
published in peer-reviewed journals should be uploaded as separate files, so that both versions are available.
1633:
is the sketch. i have problems with the form of the head. any source you have to help me would be apreciated -
1048:
1658:
ok it is done. it is hard to get more detail when this animal is simply sooo long... anyway hope you like it-
570:
Example: Dinosaurs from the Triassic or Jurassic depicted walking on grass, which did not exist at that time.
2204:
399:
2409:
2378:
2248:
347:
Dinosaurs/Image review/To Do List#Guidelines for dinosaur restorations Guidelines for dinosaur restorations
2580:
2552:
2498:
2430:
2326:
2203:
This is a image showing a range of titanosaur body proportions, im not shure which would be best to use?
2107:
2048:
1928:
1891:
1840:
1804:
1775:
1750:
1740:
Yeah, the stance appears way too wide compared to the angle of the torso. Otherwise, looks really good!
1710:
1427:
1392:
1380:
1349:
1261:
1224:
1156:
1117:
1002:
984:
948:
918:
862:
320:, but it is appreciated if sources used are listed in file descriptions (this is often requested during
956:
I'm turning in after I finish fixing my erroneous editor order, but I'll get it to you in the morning.
1939:
1379:
Absolutely right now that you are mentioning it. Will correct this in the finalized version. Thanks.
1309:: close, but the crest is a bit too high. From the known skull material, it's kind of like a subtle
317:
2201:
2561:
1549:
1207:
1073:
809:
480:
Example: Theropod dinosaurs reconstructed with overly flexed tails or pronated "bunny-style" hands.
2134:
today and got the urge to do another scale chart, this time of the longest known dinosaurs (I had
2727:
2663:
1630:
1520:
1501:
805:
803:
801:
765:
251:
2088:
1869:
Yup, this guy is new in the past few months I think. Looks great Arthur! No problems I can see.
1272:
992:
Looks good. It's not necessary, but I wonder if you could make the jugal stand out a bit more?
1971:
1288:
466:
48:
2192:
2085:
1955:
452:
depicted with advanced feathers, since a skeletal feature (osteoderms) and its proximity to
247:
64:
2611:
Looks great! Also can't find any skeletal references, but the article says it's similar to
2274:
Not a bad point - all the heads are at different levels, so why not flush them vertically?
1647:]. Hartmans site sais its more closely related to Apatosaurus, so maybe that could be used.
621:
Knowledge talk:WikiProject Mammals/Archive 4#Illustrated reconstructions of extinct species
349:
for minimum requirements for anatomical accuracy in dinosaur restorations used in articles.
2748:
2730:
2704:
2701:
2635:
2603:
2411:
2400:
2380:
2361:
2329:
2317:
2261:
2250:
2206:
2177:
2164:
2066:
2036:
2023:
2014:
1861:
1825:
1787:
1760:
1732:
1692:
1683:
1672:
1659:
1648:
1634:
1597:
1574:
1536:
1505:
1460:
1414:
1405:
1367:
1336:
1242:
1233:
1197:
1147:
1138:
1100:
1091:
1060:
1020:
1011:
993:
975:
966:
957:
938:
889:
880:
871:
853:
842:
814:
750:
728:
696:
678:
651:
625:
Knowledge talk:Featured article candidates/archive66#Reconstructed dinosaur images in FAs
1493:
2265:
1784:
1585:
1561:
1437:
1311:
1172:
793:
461:
2601:
2450:
1128:
2739:
2718:
2680:
2616:
2542:
2489:
2391:
2339:
2307:
2298:
2289:
2275:
2236:
2232:
2154:
2144:
2131:
2091:
2000:
1946:
1913:
1870:
1741:
1609:
1516:
1449:
824:
781:
780:
What's happened to this image? It isn't used in any articles, but looks complete...?
761:
705:
687:
669:
665:
504:
Exception: If the size of the animal is contested or the individual in question is a
2533:
2022:
The arms are way too small and thin in that reconstruction (Ville's, not Arthur's).
1623:
642:
556:
Image depicts a scene which is anachronistic or contradicts known geographic range.
2507:
2475:
2464:
2057:
2039:
1473:
1317:
850:
Its taken a long time due to other comitments but finally heres the final version,
833:
739:
530:
Image seems heavily inspired by another piece of media or directly copied from it.
367:
313:
2591:
1851:
1887:
2560:
jejeje better not. In my opinion, it's more convenient a serious scale diagram.
2011:
1323:
1305:
1279:
661:
2653:
2173:
1815:
2675:
2644:
1978:
1362:
1295:
1068:, soon I will upload the others. If someone can, send me the skull diagram of
2669:
1962:
1902:
929:
505:
2235:' article, so I left it. It also sems to correspond more to an 18m height.
2441:
1721:
1682:
it made the image even longer but anyway. here it is.. what do you think?-
617:
Knowledge talk:No original research/Archive 60#Illustrations violating NOR
346:
2288:. Eyeballin it, it also seems to match the Georgia mount fairly closely.
1643:
Looks good, check out Scott Hartmans supersaurus for general proportions
2084:
consensus). Basal birds and dromies had wings more along the lines of
1064:
for later comparing his crests in one image. First I did the skull of
456:(extensive scale impressions) imply that it lacked advanced feathers.
2138:
in there, but it threw off the whole 'composition' even more than
2035:
are so short it looks like there is a hand coming out of the elbow
1622:
1492:
1047:
641:
1774:
Almost forgot that one. OK, I've rotated slightly the right leg.
974:
Great as always. I can't see any skull errors. I love the shading
704:
I also cannot see the file. Can you convert this to a png, LoH?
545:
being used in the articles on the genera, or an illustration of
549:
being a direct trace of another illustration of the same genus.
308:(which automatically adds the "Inaccurate paleoart" category (
252:
58:
1886:
Feathered or not feathered, that is the question... I used
1010:
I like that; otherwise, it looked a bit concave or hollow.
841:
Thanks guys, does anyone have a front view of this animal?
477:
Image pose differs appreciably from known range of motion.
1099:
Looks great, love this dino, cant wait to see the others.
2700:
seems to have a really large head, but looks abit dodgy?
1573:
the image i used to make it was . so what do you think?-
1137:
Wow! You work astonishingly fast! I like those a lot.
2488:-style narrow-chord wings are a cool touch. Well done!
2390:
degree of hand mobility. But don't quote me on that ;)
597:
490:
Image differs appreciably from known size estimates.
1196:, could you put a bit more emphasis in the cheeks?
2506:That is awesome, I'm putting it in the article.
1468:Don't suppose anyone would mind doing a view of
594:, so they can be easily located for correction.
2429:New version of Rahonavis and Majunga headshot.
1019:No one had any other comments, so I put it in.
888:Thanks agian, ive uploaded it onto the commons.
1783:This is what Hartman sugested for gorgosauurs
1786:so they may need to be rotated a little more.
8:
2174:http://www.dinoweb.narod.ru/Saltasaurus3.gif
2697:I can hardly find anything for pachy, this
598:Click here to submit a new image for review
592:c:Category:Inaccurate dinosaur restorations
1803:One user requested a picture of this one.
1504:is the sketch. let me know what you think-
567:, two animals which did not live together.
497:which shows it being as large as an adult
465:and integument in exceptionally preserved
327:For reviews of non-dinosaur paleoart, see
1824:Great, can't see anything wrong with it.
1472:from the front to show off the duckbill?
1082:Send me an email, and I'll get you one.
800:I thought I’d try a different technique,
1058:I'm doing the skulls of each species of
582:: Images that have been approved by the
2631:
2587:
2529:
2437:
2103:
1935:
1898:
1847:
1811:
1717:
1645:], sadly i don't think a skull is known
1268:
1168:
1124:
925:
604:
340:Criteria sufficient for using an image:
2325:I found another reconstruction online
2726:This is GSPs Iguanodon if that helps
808:textured, here’s some animal testing
515:Image differs appreciably from known
412:Image differs appreciably from known
7:
2065:A Majungasaurus head would be great!
1923:Majungasaurus, Rahonavis, Utahraptor
2615:, which your drawing certainly is.
2338:somehow... Anyway, new version up.
1001:Emphasized a little bit the cheek.
611:Per following policy discussions:
28:
588:Category:Approved dinosaur images
541:depicting them as they appear in
2652:
2643:
2634:
2590:
2532:
2449:
2440:
2118:
2106:
1970:
1954:
1938:
1901:
1850:
1814:
1720:
1287:
1271:
1171:
1127:
928:
387:reconstructed with four fingers.
63:
2673:(only FA that lakced one), and
2130:Hey guys, was working a bit on
1112:Lambeosaurus lambei head series
584:Knowledge:WikiProject Dinosaurs
430:Image differs appreciably from
394:Image differs appreciably from
376:Image differs appreciably from
360:Criteria for removing an image:
18:Knowledge:WikiProject Dinosaurs
2738:Ok, updated with longer tail.
2497:Majunga head updated. Cheers.
2306:Yup, flipped the tail tip up.
879:The wait was worth it. Bravo!
493:Example: An image of an adult
445:) imply that it was feathered.
310:c:Category:Inaccurate paleoart
306:c:Template:Inaccurate paleoart
55:Dinosaur Image Review Archives
1:
2217:New version: tails included,
1459:Have added Krito to article.
2172:Copy this into your browser
2125:Arranged with heads lined up
1436:picture looks great though!
947:Yes, I'd like that. Thanks.
785:07:49, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
2752:15:44, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
2743:08:59, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
2734:08:29, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
2722:01:09, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
2708:15:50, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
2684:14:38, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
2620:14:38, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
2607:09:27, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
2584:06:08, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
2565:02:46, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
2556:01:39, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
2546:00:28, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
2511:07:18, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
2502:06:23, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
2493:14:05, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
2479:07:24, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
2468:07:23, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
2434:07:11, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
2415:21:19, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
2404:14:37, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
2395:13:35, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
2384:11:09, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
1232:I think that's a keeper :)
2776:
2365:08:53, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
2343:03:43, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
2333:17:58, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
2321:17:33, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
2311:16:10, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
2302:15:38, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
2293:15:18, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
2279:14:58, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
2270:12:23, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
2254:09:00, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
2240:01:15, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
2210:18:48, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
2196:17:36, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
2181:17:19, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
2168:17:13, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
2158:15:26, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
2148:14:57, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
2095:15:49, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
2070:09:00, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
2061:06:33, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
2052:06:31, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
2043:06:44, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
2018:10:59, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
2004:09:53, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
1932:06:01, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
1791:08:37, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
1779:06:21, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
1260:Two drafts. Any thoughts?
270:Gallery of approved images
83:Current Automatic Archives
2703:says 3m in the caption??
2551:What happened to CZJ? ;)
1917:06:19, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
1895:06:07, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
1874:06:23, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
1865:18:04, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
1844:15:00, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
1829:10:50, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
1808:05:18, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
1764:17:27, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
1754:13:59, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
1745:07:06, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
1736:20:48, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
1714:14:41, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
1696:17:27, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
1687:10:28, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
1676:20:48, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
1663:19:26, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
1652:20:05, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
1638:19:12, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
1613:12:11, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
1601:11:40, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
1589:02:48, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
1578:18:50, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
1565:06:41, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
1553:20:47, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
1544:I think that the pair of
1540:17:34, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
1531:05:44, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
1509:04:50, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
1477:03:48, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
1464:21:30, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
1453:04:47, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
1441:06:44, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
1431:04:09, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
1418:17:37, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
1409:15:08, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
1396:06:11, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
1384:01:01, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
1371:00:37, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
1353:01:01, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
1340:00:37, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
1265:14:11, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
1246:04:40, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
893:17:56, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
884:16:02, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
875:15:24, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
866:15:06, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
857:14:49, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
846:08:35, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
837:05:47, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
832:That is INSANE man! Wow!
828:23:48, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
818:23:03, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
776:05:42, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
754:04:47, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
711:20:57, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
700:17:13, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
691:15:59, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
682:08:35, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
673:05:55, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
655:23:26, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
586:team can now be found at
423:lacking primary feathers.
329:WikiProject Palaeontology
262:Current Image Review Page
231:September - December 2019
216:September - December 2018
156:September - December 2007
1237:13:12, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
1228:06:08, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
1211:02:29, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
1201:13:44, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
1160:04:45, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
1151:21:01, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
1142:20:50, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
1121:20:45, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
1104:21:01, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
1095:18:36, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
1090:, only somewhat larger.
1077:18:22, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
1024:13:15, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
1015:13:38, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
1006:04:58, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
997:13:31, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
988:05:25, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
979:15:11, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
970:15:03, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
961:05:12, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
952:05:10, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
942:04:47, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
922:04:11, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
743:19:27, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
732:12:19, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
2458:I'll let Dinoguy judge
1691:Brilliant, much better.
1256:Kritosaurus, Anatotitan
965:Okay, check your mail.
561:Megalosaurus bucklandii
434:non-skeletal elements.
400:phylogenetic bracketing
398:skeletal elements (via
1627:
1497:
1055:
1044:Parasaurolophus skulls
707:Firsfron of Ronchester
646:
508:-inflicted individual.
2715:original image review
2056:I won't stop you. :)
1626:
1496:
1051:
645:
419:Example: An image of
136:February - March 2007
2747:much better, thanks
913:Gryposaurus headshot
638:Familie Ceratopsidae
533:Example: A image of
333:paleoart review page
278:Requested Image List
236:January - April 2020
221:January - April 2019
206:January - April 2018
1155:Finalized version.
1086:is pretty close to
380:skeletal elements.
322:WP:Featured Article
116:June - October 2006
110:Old Manual Archives
2664:Pachycephalosaurus
1628:
1498:
1056:
647:
467:heterodontosaurids
151:July - August 2007
2661:Scale charts for
2268:
2100:Longest sauropods
1426:Krito finalized.
1402:The Dinosauria II
1333:Naashoibitosaurus
1321:, not as tall as
1066:P. cyrtocristatus
1053:P. cyrtocristatus
917:For your review.
870:Thanks Arthur :)
635:
634:
565:Nanosaurus agilis
459:The discovery of
288:
258:
257:
226:May - August 2019
211:May - August 2018
39:
2767:
2656:
2647:
2638:
2594:
2536:
2453:
2444:
2260:
2191:long they were.
2122:
2110:
1974:
1958:
1942:
1905:
1854:
1818:
1724:
1291:
1275:
1175:
1131:
932:
861:Wow! Amazing...
708:
627:
609:
284:
253:
141:April - May 2007
67:
59:
35:
30:
29:
2775:
2774:
2770:
2769:
2768:
2766:
2765:
2764:
2657:
2648:
2639:
2630:
2595:
2577:
2574:Chialingosaurus
2537:
2528:
2454:
2445:
2427:
2375:
2267:
2259:the larger) --
2223:Argentinosaurus
2140:Therizinosaurus
2126:
2123:
2114:
2111:
2102:
2087:, or of course
1982:
1975:
1966:
1959:
1950:
1943:
1925:
1906:
1890:as guidelines.
1884:
1855:
1837:
1835:Albertaceratops
1819:
1801:
1749:How is it now?
1725:
1706:
1621:
1491:
1299:
1292:
1283:
1276:
1258:
1176:
1132:
1114:
1061:Parasaurolophus
1046:
933:
915:
798:
706:
640:
631:
630:
610:
606:
600:
580:Approved images
289:
282:
254:
248:
72:
40:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
2773:
2771:
2763:
2762:
2761:
2760:
2759:
2758:
2757:
2756:
2755:
2754:
2695:
2691:
2659:
2658:
2651:
2649:
2642:
2640:
2633:
2629:
2626:
2625:
2624:
2623:
2622:
2597:
2596:
2589:
2576:
2571:
2570:
2569:
2568:
2567:
2541:As requested!
2539:
2538:
2531:
2527:
2521:
2520:
2519:
2518:
2517:
2516:
2515:
2514:
2513:
2456:
2455:
2448:
2446:
2439:
2426:
2423:
2422:
2421:
2420:
2419:
2418:
2417:
2374:
2371:
2370:
2369:
2368:
2367:
2357:
2356:
2355:
2354:
2353:
2352:
2351:
2350:
2349:
2348:
2347:
2346:
2345:
2323:
2264:
2221:added. I kept
2215:
2214:
2213:
2212:
2185:
2184:
2183:
2170:
2128:
2127:
2124:
2117:
2115:
2112:
2105:
2101:
2098:
2081:
2080:
2079:
2078:
2077:
2076:
2075:
2074:
2073:
2072:
1984:
1983:
1976:
1969:
1967:
1960:
1953:
1951:
1944:
1937:
1924:
1921:
1920:
1919:
1908:
1907:
1900:
1883:
1880:
1879:
1878:
1877:
1876:
1857:
1856:
1849:
1836:
1833:
1832:
1831:
1821:
1820:
1813:
1800:
1797:
1796:
1795:
1794:
1793:
1772:
1771:
1770:
1769:
1768:
1767:
1766:
1727:
1726:
1719:
1705:
1702:
1701:
1700:
1699:
1698:
1680:
1679:
1678:
1666:
1665:
1655:
1654:
1620:
1617:
1616:
1615:
1604:
1603:
1592:
1591:
1581:
1580:
1570:
1569:
1568:
1567:
1557:
1556:
1555:
1490:
1487:
1486:
1485:
1484:
1483:
1482:
1481:
1480:
1479:
1457:
1456:
1455:
1424:
1423:
1422:
1421:
1420:
1388:
1387:
1386:
1374:
1373:
1358:
1357:
1356:
1355:
1343:
1342:
1329:Anasaziasaurus
1312:Prosaurolophus
1301:
1300:
1293:
1286:
1284:
1277:
1270:
1257:
1254:
1253:
1252:
1251:
1250:
1249:
1248:
1221:
1220:
1219:
1218:
1217:
1216:
1215:
1214:
1213:
1178:
1177:
1170:
1167:
1166:
1165:
1164:
1163:
1162:
1134:
1133:
1126:
1113:
1110:
1109:
1108:
1107:
1106:
1045:
1042:
1041:
1040:
1039:
1038:
1037:
1036:
1035:
1034:
1033:
1032:
1031:
1030:
1029:
1028:
1027:
1026:
963:
935:
934:
927:
914:
911:
910:
909:
908:
907:
906:
905:
904:
903:
902:
901:
900:
899:
898:
897:
896:
895:
797:
794:Prosaurolophus
791:
790:
789:
788:
787:
757:
756:
746:
745:
736:
735:
734:
722:
721:
720:
719:
718:
717:
716:
715:
714:
713:
639:
636:
633:
632:
629:
628:
603:
602:
601:
596:
577:
576:
575:
574:
571:
568:
553:
552:
551:
550:
527:
526:
525:
524:
512:
511:
510:
509:
502:
487:
486:
485:
484:
481:
474:
473:
472:
471:
462:Kulindadromeus
457:
446:
427:
426:
425:
424:
409:
408:
407:
406:
391:
390:
389:
388:
373:
372:
357:
356:
351:
350:
337:
290:
283:
281:
280:
274:
273:
272:
266:
265:
264:
256:
255:
250:
246:
244:
241:
240:
239:
238:
233:
228:
223:
218:
213:
208:
203:
198:
193:
188:
183:
178:
173:
168:
163:
158:
153:
148:
143:
138:
133:
128:
123:
118:
107:
106:
101:
96:
91:
78:
77:
74:
73:
68:
62:
52:
51:
34:
33:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2772:
2753:
2750:
2746:
2745:
2744:
2741:
2737:
2736:
2735:
2732:
2728:
2725:
2724:
2723:
2720:
2716:
2711:
2710:
2709:
2706:
2702:
2699:
2696:
2692:
2688:
2687:
2686:
2685:
2682:
2678:
2677:
2672:
2671:
2666:
2665:
2655:
2650:
2646:
2641:
2637:
2632:
2627:
2621:
2618:
2614:
2610:
2609:
2608:
2605:
2602:
2599:
2598:
2593:
2588:
2586:
2585:
2582:
2581:ArthurWeasley
2575:
2572:
2566:
2563:
2559:
2558:
2557:
2554:
2553:ArthurWeasley
2550:
2549:
2548:
2547:
2544:
2535:
2530:
2525:
2524:Majungasaurus
2522:
2512:
2509:
2505:
2504:
2503:
2500:
2499:ArthurWeasley
2496:
2495:
2494:
2491:
2487:
2482:
2481:
2480:
2477:
2472:
2471:
2470:
2469:
2466:
2461:
2452:
2447:
2443:
2438:
2436:
2435:
2432:
2431:ArthurWeasley
2424:
2416:
2413:
2410:
2408:New version.
2407:
2406:
2405:
2402:
2399:cool thanks.
2398:
2397:
2396:
2393:
2388:
2387:
2386:
2385:
2382:
2379:
2372:
2366:
2363:
2358:
2344:
2341:
2336:
2335:
2334:
2331:
2327:
2324:
2322:
2319:
2314:
2313:
2312:
2309:
2305:
2304:
2303:
2300:
2296:
2295:
2294:
2291:
2287:
2282:
2281:
2280:
2277:
2273:
2272:
2271:
2266:
2263:
2257:
2256:
2255:
2252:
2249:
2245:
2244:
2243:
2242:
2241:
2238:
2234:
2233:Sauroposeidon
2228:
2227:Sauroposeidon
2224:
2220:
2219:Sauroposeidon
2211:
2208:
2205:
2202:
2199:
2198:
2197:
2194:
2190:
2186:
2182:
2179:
2175:
2171:
2169:
2166:
2161:
2160:
2159:
2156:
2152:
2151:
2150:
2149:
2146:
2141:
2137:
2136:Sauroposeidon
2133:
2132:Dinosaur size
2121:
2116:
2113:Update w/ Bru
2109:
2104:
2099:
2097:
2096:
2093:
2089:
2086:
2071:
2068:
2064:
2063:
2062:
2059:
2055:
2054:
2053:
2050:
2049:ArthurWeasley
2046:
2045:
2044:
2041:
2037:
2034:
2030:
2025:
2021:
2020:
2019:
2016:
2012:
2008:
2007:
2006:
2005:
2002:
1998:
1993:
1989:
1981:
1980:
1973:
1968:
1965:
1964:
1957:
1952:
1949:
1948:
1947:Majungasaurus
1941:
1936:
1934:
1933:
1930:
1929:ArthurWeasley
1922:
1918:
1915:
1910:
1909:
1904:
1899:
1897:
1896:
1893:
1892:ArthurWeasley
1889:
1881:
1875:
1872:
1868:
1867:
1866:
1863:
1859:
1858:
1853:
1848:
1846:
1845:
1842:
1841:ArthurWeasley
1834:
1830:
1827:
1823:
1822:
1817:
1812:
1810:
1809:
1806:
1805:ArthurWeasley
1799:Edmontosaurus
1798:
1792:
1789:
1785:
1782:
1781:
1780:
1777:
1776:ArthurWeasley
1773:
1765:
1762:
1757:
1756:
1755:
1752:
1751:ArthurWeasley
1748:
1747:
1746:
1743:
1739:
1738:
1737:
1734:
1729:
1728:
1723:
1718:
1716:
1715:
1712:
1711:ArthurWeasley
1703:
1697:
1694:
1690:
1689:
1688:
1685:
1681:
1677:
1674:
1670:
1669:
1668:
1667:
1664:
1661:
1657:
1656:
1653:
1650:
1646:
1644:
1642:
1641:
1640:
1639:
1636:
1632:
1625:
1618:
1614:
1611:
1606:
1605:
1602:
1599:
1594:
1593:
1590:
1587:
1583:
1582:
1579:
1576:
1572:
1571:
1566:
1563:
1558:
1554:
1551:
1547:
1546:Pentaceratops
1543:
1542:
1541:
1538:
1534:
1533:
1532:
1528:
1525:
1522:
1518:
1513:
1512:
1511:
1510:
1507:
1503:
1495:
1489:pentaceratops
1488:
1478:
1475:
1471:
1467:
1466:
1465:
1462:
1458:
1454:
1451:
1446:
1445:
1444:
1443:
1442:
1439:
1434:
1433:
1432:
1429:
1428:ArthurWeasley
1425:
1419:
1416:
1412:
1411:
1410:
1407:
1403:
1399:
1398:
1397:
1394:
1393:ArthurWeasley
1389:
1385:
1382:
1381:ArthurWeasley
1378:
1377:
1376:
1375:
1372:
1369:
1365:
1364:
1360:
1359:
1354:
1351:
1350:ArthurWeasley
1347:
1346:
1345:
1344:
1341:
1338:
1334:
1330:
1326:
1325:
1320:
1319:
1314:
1313:
1308:
1307:
1303:
1302:
1298:
1297:
1290:
1285:
1282:
1281:
1274:
1269:
1267:
1266:
1263:
1262:ArthurWeasley
1255:
1247:
1244:
1240:
1239:
1238:
1235:
1231:
1230:
1229:
1226:
1225:ArthurWeasley
1222:
1212:
1209:
1204:
1203:
1202:
1199:
1195:
1190:
1186:
1185:
1184:
1183:
1182:
1181:
1180:
1179:
1174:
1169:
1161:
1158:
1157:ArthurWeasley
1154:
1153:
1152:
1149:
1145:
1144:
1143:
1140:
1136:
1135:
1130:
1125:
1123:
1122:
1119:
1118:ArthurWeasley
1111:
1105:
1102:
1098:
1097:
1096:
1093:
1089:
1085:
1081:
1080:
1079:
1078:
1075:
1071:
1067:
1063:
1062:
1054:
1050:
1043:
1025:
1022:
1018:
1017:
1016:
1013:
1009:
1008:
1007:
1004:
1003:ArthurWeasley
1000:
999:
998:
995:
991:
990:
989:
986:
985:ArthurWeasley
982:
981:
980:
977:
973:
972:
971:
968:
964:
962:
959:
955:
954:
953:
950:
949:ArthurWeasley
946:
945:
944:
943:
940:
931:
926:
924:
923:
920:
919:ArthurWeasley
912:
894:
891:
887:
886:
885:
882:
878:
877:
876:
873:
869:
868:
867:
864:
863:ArthurWeasley
860:
859:
858:
855:
852:
849:
848:
847:
844:
840:
839:
838:
835:
831:
830:
829:
826:
822:
821:
820:
819:
816:
813:
810:
806:
804:
802:
795:
792:
786:
783:
779:
778:
777:
773:
770:
767:
763:
759:
758:
755:
752:
748:
747:
744:
741:
737:
733:
730:
726:
725:
724:
723:
712:
709:
703:
702:
701:
698:
694:
693:
692:
689:
685:
684:
683:
680:
676:
675:
674:
671:
668:, not there?
667:
666:Styracosaurus
663:
659:
658:
657:
656:
653:
644:
637:
626:
622:
618:
614:
608:
605:
599:
595:
593:
589:
585:
581:
572:
569:
566:
562:
558:
557:
555:
554:
548:
544:
543:Jurassic Park
540:
536:
535:Tyrannosaurus
532:
531:
529:
528:
521:
520:
519:constraints.
518:
517:physiological
514:
513:
507:
503:
500:
496:
492:
491:
489:
488:
482:
479:
478:
476:
475:
468:
464:
463:
458:
455:
451:
447:
444:
440:
436:
435:
433:
429:
428:
422:
418:
417:
415:
411:
410:
404:
403:
401:
397:
393:
392:
386:
382:
381:
379:
375:
374:
369:
364:
363:
362:
361:
353:
352:
348:
344:
343:
342:
341:
336:
334:
330:
325:
323:
319:
318:WP:PERTINENCE
315:
311:
307:
302:
298:
294:
287:
279:
276:
275:
271:
268:
267:
263:
260:
259:
243:
242:
237:
234:
232:
229:
227:
224:
222:
219:
217:
214:
212:
209:
207:
204:
202:
199:
197:
194:
192:
189:
187:
184:
182:
179:
177:
174:
172:
169:
167:
164:
162:
159:
157:
154:
152:
149:
147:
144:
142:
139:
137:
134:
132:
129:
127:
126:December 2006
124:
122:
121:November 2006
119:
117:
114:
113:
112:
111:
105:
102:
100:
97:
95:
92:
90:
87:
86:
85:
84:
80:
79:
76:
75:
71:
66:
61:
60:
57:
56:
50:
47:
46:
45:
44:
38:
32:
31:
23:
19:
2674:
2668:
2662:
2660:
2613:Kentrosaurus
2612:
2578:
2573:
2540:
2523:
2485:
2459:
2457:
2428:
2376:
2285:
2231:
2226:
2222:
2218:
2216:
2188:
2139:
2135:
2129:
2082:
2032:
2028:
1996:
1991:
1987:
1985:
1977:
1961:
1945:
1926:
1885:
1838:
1802:
1707:
1629:
1545:
1523:
1499:
1469:
1401:
1361:
1332:
1328:
1322:
1318:Lophorhothon
1316:
1310:
1304:
1294:
1278:
1259:
1193:
1188:
1115:
1087:
1083:
1069:
1065:
1059:
1057:
1052:
936:
916:
823:Sweet Dude!
799:
796:Maximus Head
768:
648:
607:
579:
578:
564:
560:
546:
542:
539:Velociraptor
538:
534:
516:
498:
494:
460:
453:
450:Ceratosaurus
449:
442:
438:
431:
420:
414:non-skeletal
413:
395:
384:
377:
359:
358:
339:
338:
326:
303:
299:
295:
291:
150:
131:January 2007
109:
108:
82:
81:
69:
54:
53:
42:
41:
22:Image review
2628:Size charts
2486:Microraptor
2286:Saltasaurus
2193:Mgiganteus1
2029:Carnotaurus
1997:Microraptor
1882:Juravenator
1839:Thoughts?
1619:Supersaurus
1324:Gryposaurus
1306:Kritosaurus
1280:Kritosaurus
1194:Gryposaurus
662:Triceratops
563:chasing an
547:Deinonychus
499:Apatosaurus
495:Torvosaurus
470:bracketing.
454:Carnotaurus
448:Example: A
443:Caudipteryx
437:Example: A
421:Microraptor
385:Deinonychus
383:Example: A
324:reviews).
293:accuracy.
181:2012 - 2013
2749:Steveoc 86
2731:Steveoc 86
2705:Steveoc 86
2676:Utahraptor
2604:Steveoc 86
2425:Madagascar
2412:Steveoc 86
2401:Steveoc 86
2381:Steveoc 86
2373:Gallimimus
2362:Steveoc 86
2330:Steveoc 86
2318:Steveoc 86
2251:Steveoc 86
2207:Steveoc 86
2178:Steveoc 86
2165:Steveoc 86
2067:Steveoc 86
2033:Aucasaurus
2015:Steveoc 86
1979:Utahraptor
1862:Steveoc 86
1826:Steveoc 86
1788:Steveoc 86
1761:Steveoc 86
1733:Steveoc 86
1693:Steveoc 86
1684:LadyofHats
1673:Steveoc 86
1660:LadyofHats
1649:Steveoc 86
1635:LadyofHats
1598:LadyofHats
1575:LadyofHats
1537:Steveoc 86
1506:LadyofHats
1470:Anatotitan
1461:J. Spencer
1415:Steveoc 86
1406:J. Spencer
1368:J. Spencer
1363:Anatotitan
1337:J. Spencer
1296:Anatotitan
1243:J. Spencer
1234:J. Spencer
1198:J. Spencer
1148:Steveoc 86
1139:J. Spencer
1101:Steveoc 86
1092:J. Spencer
1088:P. walkeri
1084:P. tubicen
1072:. Cheers.
1070:P. tubicen
1021:J. Spencer
1012:J. Spencer
994:J. Spencer
976:Steveoc 86
967:J. Spencer
958:J. Spencer
939:J. Spencer
890:Steveoc 86
881:J. Spencer
872:Steveoc 86
854:Steveoc 86
843:Steveoc 86
815:Steveoc 86
751:LadyofHats
729:LadyofHats
697:Steveoc 86
679:Steveoc 86
652:LadyofHats
416:elements.
49:WP:DINOART
2670:Iguanodon
2460:Rahonavis
1992:Rahonavis
1988:Rahonavis
1963:Rahonavis
1888:this page
1704:Alioramus
1586:Spawn Man
1562:Spawn Man
1438:Spawn Man
983:Updated.
559:Example:
506:gigantism
146:June 2007
104:Archive 4
99:Archive 3
94:Archive 2
89:Archive 1
43:Shortcut:
2740:Dinoguy2
2719:Dinoguy2
2681:Dinoguy2
2617:Dinoguy2
2579:Cheers.
2562:Dropzink
2543:Dinoguy2
2490:Dinoguy2
2392:Dinoguy2
2340:Dinoguy2
2308:Dinoguy2
2299:Debivort
2290:Dinoguy2
2276:Debivort
2237:Dinoguy2
2155:Debivort
2145:Dinoguy2
2092:Dinoguy2
2001:Dinoguy2
1927:Cheers.
1914:Dinoguy2
1871:Dinoguy2
1742:Dinoguy2
1610:Dinoguy2
1550:Dropzink
1527:contribs
1517:Casliber
1450:Debivort
1208:Dropzink
1074:Dropzink
825:Debivort
782:Debivort
772:contribs
762:Casliber
688:Debivort
670:Debivort
439:Nomingia
70:Archives
20: |
2694:aswell.
2508:Sheep81
2476:Sheep81
2465:Sheep81
2058:Sheep81
2040:Sheep81
1474:Sheep81
1241:Added.
834:Sheep81
740:Circeus
432:implied
396:implied
1596:heavy-
1223:Done!
650:later-
355:taxon.
2526:scale
2262:drini
1759:this.
1335:. :)
1315:or a
523:all).
378:known
368:WP:OR
314:WP:OI
16:<
2225:and
2031:and
2024:Here
1731:seen
1631:here
1521:talk
1502:here
1331:and
1189:knew
766:talk
345:See
316:and
201:2017
196:2016
191:2015
186:2014
176:2011
171:2010
166:2009
161:2008
2189:how
664:or
537:or
402:).
331:'s
2667:,
1999:.
1529:)
1404:.
1187:I
774:)
623:,
619:,
615:,
335::
1524:·
1519:(
769:·
764:(
501:.
286:?
37:?
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
