406:
422:
434:
458:
370:
382:
446:
394:
49:
361:: It's common for editors to take an existing article and use it as a basis for a new article (cloning its structure, essentially). When current articles are consistent, future new articles will be consistent. Consistency among like articles also helps bots and scripts who want to take Knowledge (XXG)'s content and re-use it.
349:: readers form expectations about how an article should be laid out and they form expectations about how similar articles will be laid out. When there is consistency and uniformity between like articles (such as articles about U.S. Supreme Court cases), it increases the utility and usability of our articles to readers.
161:
This section includes facts of the dispute, its history in lower courts, and relevant historical/political context. Subsections may include history, facts of the case, procedural history or lower courts (or even a subsection for each lower court, appropriately titled), and petition (for certiorari).
193:
The most significant difference between the "Supreme Court" style and the "Opinion of the Court" style is that the "Supreme Court" style contains the arguments section while the "Opinion of the Court" style keeps oral arguments in the preceding "Background" section.
189:
There are two possible ways to structure the meat of the article, described in subsections below. Use whichever style seems most appropriate for the case. The "Supreme Court" style is designed for more lengthy, in-depth articles, but either structure is acceptable.
97:
for U.S. Supreme Court cases. It contains all the necessary information and, if followed, will give some structure to an article. Shorter articles don't need an outline. All of this may be varied as appropriate; use your judgment.
449:
445:
219:
This section should contain a summary of the Court's opinion as well as any important events of note that occurred during the case. Use this section for excerpts from the decision and precedents cited.
425:
421:
393:
373:
369:
437:
433:
385:
381:
461:
457:
409:
405:
295:
223:
Subsections or a paragraph for concurring and dissenting opinions can also be added as appropriate. Should be in the form of "Concurrences" and "Dissents" for section headers.
205:
Subsections or a paragraph for concurring and dissenting opinions can also be added as appropriate. Should be in the form of "Concurrences" and "Dissents" for section headers.
17:
237:
Cases that clarify/reverse; relevant developments for the parties or dispute (outcome of remand/"Nixon turned over his tapes..."), social effects.
73:
78:
143:
480:
202:
This section should cover the arguments made, the opinion or judgment of the court, and any concurring or dissenting opinions.
165:
Oral arguments can go at the end of this section if you choose the "Opinion of the Court" style (see full explanation below).
115:
82:
61:
328:
275:
67:
298:
27:
57:
342:
Why make pages consistent? Why have a (prescriptivist) style guide? For a few important reasons:
130:
355:: When there's a sound structure for editors to follow, it makes articles easier to write!
301:
474:
288:
152:'''''Case name''''', XXX U.S. YYY (ZZZZ), is a ] case in which the Court held ...
316:
70:
on how to format and present article content within their area of interest.
280:
320:
312:
240:
Refer forward to subsequent cases citing this decision as precedent.
339:
A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds. – Emerson
48:
43:
324:
35:
18:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases
66:It contains the advice or opinions of one or more
111:Every U.S. Supreme Court case article should use
8:
307:In the external links section, include a
274:In the references section, conform to
7:
79:Knowledge (XXG) policy or guideline
83:thoroughly vetted by the community
24:
359:Consistency helps Knowledge (XXG)
456:
444:
432:
420:
404:
392:
380:
368:
146:case in which the Court held ...
47:
133:should resemble the following:
329:Knowledge (XXG):External links
276:Knowledge (XXG):Citing sources
1:
245:== Subsequent developments ==
142:, XXX U.S. YYY (ZZZZ), is a
311:link to the decision (e.g.
144:United States Supreme Court
497:
228:== Opinion of the Court ==
25:
353:Consistency helps editors
347:Consistency helps readers
294:template, which produces
481:WikiProject style advice
284:citation format and the
233:Subsequent developments
81:, as it has not been
269:== External links ==
215:Opinion of the Court
210:== Supreme Court ==
116:Infobox SCOTUS case
93:The following is a
102:Article structure
91:
90:
488:
464:
460:
452:
448:
440:
436:
428:
424:
412:
408:
400:
396:
388:
384:
376:
372:
293:
287:
264:== References ==
186:
185:
181:
170:== Background ==
153:
120:
114:
77:is not a formal
74:This information
51:
44:
38:
496:
495:
491:
490:
489:
487:
486:
485:
471:
470:
469:
468:
462:
451:Accomplishments
450:
438:
426:
416:
410:
398:
386:
374:
337:
291:
285:
254:Relevant code:
252:
243:Relevant code:
235:
226:Relevant code:
217:
208:Relevant code:
200:
187:
183:
179:
177:
176:
168:Relevant code:
159:
151:
150:Relevant code:
127:
118:
112:
109:
104:
87:
86:
42:
41:
34:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
494:
492:
484:
483:
473:
472:
467:
466:
454:
442:
430:
427:Article alerts
417:
415:
414:
402:
390:
378:
365:
364:
363:
362:
356:
350:
336:
333:
327:). Conform to
272:
271:
270:
266:
265:
261:
260:
259:== See also ==
251:
250:Final sections
248:
246:
234:
231:
229:
216:
213:
211:
199:
196:
175:
173:
171:
158:
155:
148:
147:
126:
123:
108:
105:
103:
100:
89:
88:
71:
54:
52:
40:
39:
31:
26:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
493:
482:
479:
478:
476:
465:
459:
455:
453:
447:
443:
441:
435:
431:
429:
423:
419:
418:
413:
407:
403:
401:
395:
391:
389:
383:
379:
377:
371:
367:
366:
360:
357:
354:
351:
348:
345:
344:
343:
340:
334:
332:
330:
326:
322:
318:
314:
310:
305:
303:
300:
297:
290:
283:
282:
277:
268:
267:
263:
262:
258:
257:
256:
255:
249:
247:
244:
241:
238:
232:
230:
227:
224:
221:
214:
212:
209:
206:
203:
198:Supreme Court
197:
195:
191:
182:
174:
172:
169:
166:
163:
156:
154:
145:
141:
140:
136:
135:
134:
132:
124:
122:
117:
106:
101:
99:
96:
84:
80:
76:
75:
69:
65:
63:
59:
53:
50:
46:
45:
37:
33:
32:
29:
19:
397:
358:
352:
346:
341:
338:
308:
306:
279:
273:
253:
242:
239:
236:
225:
222:
218:
207:
204:
201:
192:
188:
167:
164:
160:
149:
138:
137:
128:
110:
94:
92:
72:
68:WikiProjects
55:
36:WP:SCOTUS/SG
399:Style guide
95:style guide
56:This is an
157:Background
375:Resources
139:Case name
475:Category
463:Feedback
304:(1973).
281:Bluebook
28:Shortcut
439:Reports
387:Members
335:Purpose
107:Infobox
325:Altlaw
321:Justia
309:stable
278:. Use
178:": -->
62:style
58:essay
16:<
411:Plan
313:Oyez
299:U.S.
289:ussc
180:edit
131:lead
129:The
125:Lead
317:LII
302:113
296:410
60:on
477::
331:.
323:,
319:,
315:,
292:}}
286:{{
121:.
119:}}
113:{{
184:]
85:.
64:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
