Knowledge talk:WikiProject Mammals/Archive 8

3706:. The code has changed significantly from the Toolserver version, but users should notice few differences. Please take a moment to look over your project's list for any anomalies, such as pages that you expect to see that are missing or pages that seem to have more views than expected. Note that unlike other tools, this tool aggregates all views from redirects, which means it will typically have higher numbers. (For January 2014 specifically, 35 hours of data is missing from the WMF data, which was approximated from other dates. For most articles, this should yield a more accurate number. However, a few articles, like ones featured on the Main Page, may be off). 4204:. This is for our class Online Communities at Cornell University. We aim to make the C-Class article a B-Class or even better! We are working to expand the fox's characteristic section (adding more anatomy and behavior); revamp the conservation section; and add an "urban foxes" section (foxes in urban settings and their impact on humans/pets). We are new to Knowledge editing and would love some help, guidance, and/or support! Anything from suggestions on new sections or sections to edit to coding/grammar issues will be greatly appreciated! 267:

says, a list of all the people currently involved in the project is also a must for the project page, or it does look like its just one person doing his own thing without discussion with other users. I'm not against the project - we have WP:Rodent (among others) as a sub group within this one, so this isn't an obviously bad idea. But I do think it needs to demonstrate some more existing support from a number of editors, and that the portal page, in particular needs to be better thought out.

2802:(which didn't even have an importance rating!) Because of that, I've been bold made a much more coherent category. Basically, I re-rated most of the articles in that category (mostly to mid-importance) and changed the importance of a few other articles. Category:Top-importance mammal articles is now populated very narrowly. I'm not an expert, but I assume that people with appropriate expertise could change the importance of other articles on a case-by-case basis. Thank you. 2360: 31: 2863: 2854: 1048: 4325: 906:, and essentially reinstates a "true ungulates" clade (seemingly not named). Of course, it's entirely possible that there's no real scientific consensus between the two hypotheses, but if that's the case it should be stated directly, contrasting the two, as opposed to using one source in some places, and another in others, thereby creating inconsistency between different articles. 629: 2333:, then I think we're okay to include it, even if it's not in certain specific sources, such as the IUCN or MSW3. Granted, there may be some room for debate as to what constitutes reliable in this context, and the IUCN isn't a bad place to start, at least for mammals, but we will need some flexibility to reflect new discoveries. For instance, I added 459: 3266:

them because I don't always know which species are missing). Making one big list is the easiest way of doing so and once I am finished it should help anybody looking for the complete list all in one. It has taken me 4 years to complete this list and I have decided to add it to wikipedia for others to use and see. I also originally created "

3782:(until Sunday the 16th inclusively). A few Wikipedians are collaborating on the article, but we could use more detailed content on rare breeds of pigs, rabbits, cattle, goats, donkeys, and other mammals! Anyone who sees this message is welcome to join our efforts. No need to be an expert. Any edit that helps improve the article is welcome! 2015:. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are 1150:. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are 1111:. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are 799:. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are 2946:

So, essentially, it's dead, and anyone coming to it wanting to help out would probably benefit far more from a redirect to somewhere active. So I'd be in favour of such a redirect (Palaeo seems best), without prejudice to re-establishing the project or doing something more with it, should interest develop again in the future.

4232:

Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Knowledge struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for

2945:

Looking through the project and its history, it seems there has been no activity on the Project page since April '11. The project seems to have only one member, who hasn't made any edits to articles about prehistoric mammals in that time, either. (No criticism intended; he has been active elsewhere).

4514:

Though this might be an excellent picture, I feel a high quality picture with a natural background (again, favoring rodents) would be ideal. And, in all honesty, I would favor a slightly lower quality photo of a rodent in its natural environment. (After all, the icon will be of reduced quality due

3556:. I've reviewed the ZooKeys article and have noticed for some time the near pleas of other authors that the genus was in desperate need of review. I believe this change will easily hold up to further review and that we should get these articles prepped and, when we like them, make the above moves. - 2436:

claims that the long suspected contribution of the steppe polecat has been disproved and the European polecat has been established (based on morphological, cytological and molecular studies) as the sole ancestor (and that the ferret was originally domesticated for hunting vermin), both with sources.

2567:

This is not my field, but it seems that simply means "at the latest"; what if nobody has bothered to look in earlier strata? Since I can't find a source for something like: "The temporal range for this species is...", or at least "fossil records indicate...", then I'm reluctant to include the range

1293:

Sorry this is my mistake that I just realised I meant to identify the image as a tiger quoll not an eastern quoll (its very early in the morning in Australia), No zoo or wildlife park houses Western Quolls in Australia and billabong koala park only houses eastern quolls and tiger qoulls. I will fix

107:

G'day everyone, I have been asked by The Arbiter while he is away to help out here with general maintenance and to give assistance if required. I know the project pretty much runs itself but if anyone needs a hand please dont hesitate to ask. I have been and will continue to assess the 80+ articles

3265:

for bringing this to my attention. I would also like to say that there is not an exact list like this one anywhere else on wikipedia and that all the other lists are scattered and sometimes hard to interpret (many are no longer complete and it is a lot of work to go to each individual page and add

2900:

came to the conclusion in 2011 that it should be given the benefit of the doubt, but I think the time has come for it to be either just deleted or at best made into a taskforce either here or at WP Extinction. That's not a comment in any way on the importance of prehistoric animals, just that this

1408:

The current article entitled "Elk" should be corrected and renamed as "Wapiti" according to the World List of Mammalian Species by Corbet and Hill. Also according to British dictionaries "elk" is the equivalent of North American "moose" (Alces alces), while "wapiti" is more closely related to "red

352:

about had better articles than extinct mammals we have huge amounts of information on. And it's no wonder that nothing has been done, since when somebody tries to help, they are sorely rebuked. I can't fix this all by myself. I just needed something to advertise how underdeveloped this subject is.

266:

provides. Although I don't see anything wrong with a WikiProject on the subject, the portal page seems to have been created prematurely. I'd wait until the project itself has built up more steam, and merge the information currently at the portal into the project page, where it belongs. As Innotata

2978:

I agree with the comments here already about folding it into WP:Paleo. As one of the folks who will occasionally whip up a paleo-mammal article (Im mostly a paleo-insect and paleo-plant guy) I am much more inclined to tag my pages with the WP:Paleontology banner then with WP:Paleo-mammals or for

897:

I'm hoping this might be the best place to discuss this, as it affects a number of different articles. I notice that there are two significantly different versions of the top-level taxonomy of the laurasiatheres, as regards how the ungulates and carnivores are resolved. One version, uniting the

859:

Yes, I've noticed these too, and agree that they aren't terribly useful, though the editor is obviously acting in good faith. They might be useful for lower quality article, although in general that doesn't seem to be where they're being posted. But I'd wait a bit longer to see how the discussion

837:

says we should avoid links to "Any site that does not provide a unique resource beyond what the article would contain if it became a featured article." I think these articles being linked to are essentially the kind of articles we are building, so to me they fail this item. They might make great

608:

This list has been expanded quite a bit over the past year or so, and with all the references, the page load is pretty sluggish now. I'm curious how others feel about trying to split it up. I figure some options are to distinguish between attacks involving "wild" vs "captive". Also it could be

724:

seems to be explicit in saying that the material that is sourced is what the editor has analysed and the in-line citation should not be given as only where the source gained information from. However, there is a different interpenetration to this at by an outreach project that are transcribing

491:

Me and another editor have been having a content (now apparently a sourcing) dispute that I have been waiting for input on at the talk page, but no one else has chimed in. I don't want to continue to revert and engage in edit warring. If someone or better a few editors could please look at the

3523:

stating that it is a genus with three (five?) species of olingo and the olinguito. That is a change that makes sense to me now, for the rest of the renaming and rewriting it might be best to wait for a larger variety of reliable sources to chime in (which I'm sure will happen in short order).

874:

Most of the links are to pictures taken by cameras that were automatically triggered in the wild. Consequently the pictures are very poor. Often (in the case of the black bear) you can't even see the faces of the animals. I think many if not most of these links are not useful. I just reverted

181:

What an un-thought out idea, The user who created a WikiProject, Portal and a number of templates that serve no purpose what so ever. I stronly recommend they be deleted as a pure waste of server space. Please consider joining WikiProject Mammals and help with those pages instead of creating

3682:

regarding some differing sources on the classification of two species of fruit bat. As I note there, I suspect there was a re-working of the phylogeny but I can't seem to find it. If anyone wants to dig through the literature or has insight to this, clarifying it in the article would be

1665:

but all references to the squirrels are in a "newsletter" or "journal" that are not peer-reviewed and are therefore not appropriate as sources. These references appear to be in the category of personal research. Other pages have been modified to recognize these two species: including

1781:", which redirects to a place in Romania, presumably erroneously. Does anyone know of a mammal called the Sumal? If not, what could this line refer to? Also, are the gerbils the only rodents referred to as desert rates? Do other desert mammals sometimes attract this nickname? 1381: 1315: 929:, it looks like the basal radiation of laurasiatheres was very fast, perhaps quasi-instantaneous, which means it may be futile to search for interordinal clades among laurasiatheres. From a quick review, it seems the only well-supported clades are Carnivora + Pholidota ( 4088:

I have a dispute with another user who is dual=tagging articles tagged by WikiProject equine with WikiProject Mammals as well. I have always understood that rarely is there a need to double-tag "parent" and "child" wikiprojects. The other user feels differently. See

4053:

for science, is offering 24 Wikipedians free access for one year to its prestigious range of scientific journals. Please note that much of the content of these journals is already freely available online, the details varying slightly between the journals – see the

1977: 3729:

is used to authenticate users, allowing only regular users to make changes to prevent abuse. A visible history of configuration additions and changes is coming soon. Once tools become fully available, their toolserver versions will redirect to Labs.

2453:, who did not accept the handbook as source for the European-polecat-only view, and even opposed the mere inclusion of the view, for reasons that are not clear to me from the discussion. Could somebody more knowledgeable than me get involved there? -- 4271:

at the Anatomy Project about a mismatch between the title of the project and its scope. The title refers broadly to anatomy, but the project rejects all articles that are not primarily about human anatomy. Thus, for example, none of the articles in

1960:

Hello, since the pocket pet group seems inactive, and the rodent work-group has split off, I'm proposing turning the pocket pet group into a lagomorph work group. I am putting some comments on the work that I think needs doing on that talk page

4133:

We agree. Actually, over at the council, they came up with a solution that would allow tagging in the project box, but as Plantdrew appears to have dropped the stick, it may be a moot point now. I'm in "let sleeping dogs (of any breed) lie."

3821:. These 4 cusps are important in mammalian taxonomy and paleontology, but are defined primarily by their relative locations, so I think having a centralized coverage that briefly defines each will better serve readers. Please see discussion at 4233:

the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please

4001:. Yes, they both cover heavily the evolution, classification, and paleontology, but are very scant in the biology and "neontology" of living mammals/placentals (anatomy, physiology, reproduction, etc), and a sentence or empty header with 2246:

I am currently adding range maps to some bat species and am also planning on expanding some of the articles (although I'm not a native speaker, hope this would still be ok). That's when I found for example species listed under the genus

3997:(Placentalia inclusive), perhaps the two most broadly overarching articles to this project (and likely to be especially useful to nonspecialist readers), are quite lacking in basic coverage of what exactly a mammal or placental mammal 2273:

As I understand IUCN list, it is mainly for keeping track of species at risk and especially species at risk that are being studied. I don't think its intention was to be a list of all animal species. For another reputable list try the

2541:

Thanks. It seems the most I could "dig up" was somewhere between 3-7 samples (probable data overlap) from reliably datable strata - including your Smith 1973. Seems like not enough to specify any reliable 'Temporal range'. ~Eric F

1424:

That World List should not necessarily be followed, both because it is years out of date and because it (I assume) uses British names throughout, whereas we should use American and Canadian forms for North American animals such as

2897: 309: 1356:

That is correct, I would move it myself but I dont have file move rights on commons. Thanks for the logo size fix on Billabong article I did intend on fixing it and expanding the article just got caught up in real life stuff.

1692:

Mammal Species of the World does not currently recognize any species described after 2005, because that was when the book was published. Whether these two species were described in a way that satisfies the criteria of the

651:, but I'm not sure whether that's really diagnostic. Few sources seem to talk about differences in external morphology between the two species, though I was easily able to ID a colugo skeleton on the basis of my sources. 2255:. What is the general consensus on species recognition? Considering that many articles especially on bats are stubs, I would personally recommend to only list species that are recognized by authorities such as the IUCN. 1983:

This bot-created list has not been maintained for over 4 years, so it is seriously out-of-date. I've nominated it for deletion, unless anyone can justify keeping it, and finding a way of resurrecting the bot. Cheers,

368:

I strongly agree with your point while strongly disagreeing with the idea that prehistoric mammals should have a separate portal from the regular mammal portal. Why not just add more prehistoric mammal content to it?

3644:

page, and I do no a thing or two about the Japanese Serow along with other mammals, if you were worried that someone who didn't had edited the page. Although I'm trying to add a book citation and I don't know how.

4483:

I'm not particularly interested in moles. I chose that image as an example because of its quality and simplicity, relative to the current icon. I was also thinking that a rodent might be the most justified choice.

2328:

I'd agree with Dger and Ucucha, as regards the IUCN not being definitive (I believe it's due for an update next year, incidentally, so we might see some new species added to it then). If the species is attested in

3479:

I don't see any reason to rename the genus. That they give the new species a cute new name doesn't change the fact that the genus has been known as "olingos" for a long time; even the title of the article equates

1074: 261:

A problem with this in its current form is that the Portal reads more like a Project page, including, for example, a list of project tasks, rather than an overview of the subject in the way that (for example)

2568:

graph in the taxobox, per 'WP:OR' - all I'm finding is "specimen found here" and "specimen found there". Btw, sorry that my 1st link didn't go where I thought it would, must be in some sort of frame. ~Eric F

3498:

Yes, but in the common tongue, "olingo" now seems refers to all the species in the genus except the new guy. Perhaps it's just too soon to tell. Ok, #1 I'll hold off on (except the little redirect I made. -

2930:

A redirect to WikiProject Paleo sounds like a good idea. I don't know if there's even enough editors writing about prehistoric mammals (besides more recently extinct mammals like mammoths) for a task force.

2109:

to me, although that's not an animal on the list provided by the zoo. But then, the only bovids on that are domestic goat, the sitatunga, greater kudu, and klipspringer, and it's clearly not any of those.

4009:

seems unnecessarily skeletal. I'd like to propose a month-long or longer drive to improve both articles, expanding coverage while still redirecting to subtopics where appropriate. Maybe something akin to

2189: 2441:

would take precedence, and it also seems to describe a current consensus in the field, given that it is sourced to an authoritive handbook, which is also more recent than any of the sources cited in

4058:. For the purposes of this offer the Royal Society's journals are divided into 3 groups: Biological sciences, Physical sciences and history of science. For full details and signing-up, please see 1143: 1070: 4455:. I'll be the first to admit that this is a sticky issue, based on solely on opinion and bias, but given both of our biases, I'm inclined to favor the (so far) most successful mammals to date. 792: 3261:

Ok, I have a list already created and am having trouble editing it with my computer, it is to large for me to finish just yet. Once I come up with a better comuputer I will finish it. Thank you

387:

experts and persuade them to contribute. At the time of the portals creation, I thought a portal would be perfect for this goal. I now realize this is wrong. How do I attract other users, then?

3942:, since it obviously isn't a species. I've put the appropriate subtemplate on its page, but it won't currently appear in the appropriate section of that subtemplate, since there isn't one. 3621:. I'm nothing like an animal expert, though, and I think it's unlikely I haven't botched terminology or something. Could someone who knows their stuff please take a look at it? Thanks, 4011: 2008: 2284:

but they had the same list of six species. Nevertheless, the two lists don't always agree. Both lists are always somewhat out-of-date. The IUCN list gets updated more frequently.

4178: 1104: 3852:), but it can serve a useful function as a reference page. Thus it should only be transcluded on one or two pages, usually the main article and/or a list article for the topic. 1057:

at WikiProject Animals, a number of editors have indicated that the presentation of the current guidelines on the capitalization of common names of species is somewhat unclear.

725:

material from ARKive, and they have been transcribing material from ARKive and using the the sources within ARKive as the in-line references. Some of the articles affected are

4563: 4451:

person, I'm instinctually inclined to favor their pics. Though moles are no more or less a good example of mammals, maybe we should favor a member of the most populous order,

2960:

I think we have about four or five people (including me) who focus (sporadically) on extinct mammal articles. And the paleo project is surely enough if we want to communicate.

4408:

Yeah, I think what we have is fine and I'm not a fan of the circus it would entail to change it. I've been through one of those for WP:Animals. Long, drawn out and a pain.

3070: 4300: 3721:

is currently partially available (assessment data and a few projects may not be available at the moment). The tool to add new projects to the bot's list is also available

1608:- the article cites the author and mentions a periodical that is associated with the same taxon author. Does not seem like a great place to describe a new mammal species. 1467: 2089:. Anyone good at bovid identification? All I know is this is likely an Asian bovid, and it's rather small (guesstimate: between 1.5-3 ft shoulder height). There's a male 4592:, we are hosting a "WikiSprint" which is a week long editathon starting on January 19th for all articles related to marine mammals. Please considering enrolling on our 4156: 3176: 3073:

looks alright but the lead is a mess, so many numbers, and contains information not covered in the body. It'd be great for more people to have a look over it. Cheers,

2143:

The link to Stirling in the Adelaide Hills is to Stirling in Scotland. Could somebody fix this, please, as I don't currently know how to embed links so I can't, yet!

1222:. It's an endangered rat, too. But I didn't find it listed on the Missing Mammals page. Just wanted the project members to know the article now exists. Thanks. -- 3733:

If you have any questions, want to report any bugs, or there are any features you would like to see that aren't currently available on the Toolserver tools, see the

4181:. It would be a pity if it failed there through lack of interest. If anyone feels like reviewing or commenting on the article it would be much appreciated. Thanks. 3588: 3316:

Reverted to the most recent edit where it was just a list of genera. Connon, you can grab the version from just before my edit to pull that into your userspace. -

4425:

I agree it is fine but it could be better. I realise I'm being pedantic. I'm surprised; the icon of WP:Tree of life was recently changed, quickly and painlessly.

3185: 3544:

Four species (northern, eastern lowland, western lowland, and olinguito). I've updated my #1 above. I have quick rewrites in my user space for folks to work on:

979:

pages should each mention both possibilities. Makes it somewhat more awkward in the cases of pages that are only aluding to one or other cladogram in passing.

4515:

to it's size, so quality on this scale will not be an issue.) Anyway, I'm glad we agree on what you said above. Hopefully other editors will share our views.

94: 86: 4593: 3452: 1241: 1054: 81: 69: 64: 59: 3779: 2817: 602: 777: 4208: 3938:

Done for numbers two to six above, since they were all already in the appropriate subtemplates (as broken links or redirects). Not sure what's best for

1336: 1275: 2885: 4540:

See, this is why I oppose the whole thing. If I were to weigh in, I'd say that we ought to encourage involvement with a good photo of some sort of

250:

Perhaps there could be such a project or portal, but these pages were created without any discussion by one user, so are not really a WikiProject. —

3349:, and update to indicate the 4 species and 6 subspecies as per the ZooKeys article... or perhaps rewrite this article and make a new genus article. 2582:

Actually, I did find: "Maximum range based only on fossils: base of the Pleistocene to the top of the Holocene or 2.588 to 0.000 Ma" from PaleoDB.

2779: 2304:, it appears that the IUCN (for whatever reason) is not listing some recently described species. However, the list in our article is too long, as 1800: 1186: 410: 3232:). Surely there's no point to such a massive list when the same can be (and is) accomplished with many smaller lists for each order/family/etc. 2012: 1147: 1108: 1077:. Your input is requested to determine whether or not this table is needed, and to ensure that it is done in the best way possible. Thank you. 796: 2556:

I'm not sure I understand. If there is one reliable record from the Pleistocene (and there is), its temporal range started in the Pleistocene.

2309: 669:

on the wikiproject page but was unsure where to put it. On wikiproject birds there is a style guide to achieve some uniformity in writing. See

643:

species? This picture hasn't been identified, and it is a pretty good image. As I wrote on Commons, I think the white shoulder patch suggests

383:

I am not an expert on this subject. By myself, I couldn't add hardly anything to this subject matter. I would just like to attract people who

3900:

Could a helpful member of the project please classify these articles and enter them in the appropriate section in the correct subtemplate of

2691: 2654: 3848:, I finally, today, got around to splitting it into more manageable chunks. A navbox this size cannot really serve as a genuine navbox (per 3270:" as an intended list of all the mammals, it has just been hard because all my past efforts where deleted before I could even get started. 4071: 3069:

on April 15th. It was reviewed as a FA in 2008 and as such requires a good deal of cleanup before its in a decent state for the Main Page.

765: 336:

underdeveloped. Not a single user seems to think that the subject matter means anything at all. The matter had all ready been mentioned at

667:

Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Biology#Consensus_how_scientific_names_are_displayed_in_the_lead_of_species_articles_listed_under_common_names

535:

Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Biology#Consensus_how_scientific_names_are_displayed_in_the_lead_of_species_articles_listed_under_common_names

4245:(Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) 3661: 3286: 3213: 3092: 2889: 2732: 2717: 2150: 2042:. Is this the definitive decision of the Project? (Sorry, I have not been contributing much for some time, so may well be out of touch)— 1796:

I've been unable to find any animal called "sumal"; the word doesn't occur in the Oxford English Dictionary. Perhaps it's old vandalism.

1777:, and verify that it looks accurate (from a mammalogical perspective at least)? I'm slightly puzzled by the entry "an old name for the 1523:). This may be the last remaining redlink for a large mammal species on Knowledge. If anyone wants to claim it, here are some sources: 409:(or both). If the task force does well, then I can't see anyone objecting to it expanding into a full-blown wikiproject in due course. 4268: 3336:

With the announcement today of the new species and the review of the genus in the same article, I plan to make the following changes:

3096: 2584: 2569: 2543: 2511: 2485: 2082: 980: 907: 673:, which the mammals wikiproject lacks. Might be a good idea to see whether most of the bird parameters apply here or not and discuss? 666: 534: 290: 213: 167: 47: 17: 1478:

It is a very important subject, and I wish to take it to GA/FA status in the future. Species involved with the evolution of mammals (

587:

is currently being rewritten, and will hopefully go to FA. Any contributions from people in this project will be much appreciated. --

108:

for WP:Mammals so if anyone finds that I have made a mistake please let me know and I will correct it asap (I am only human). Cheers

4366: 4119: 3302:, where it will not be deleted before you can get started and where other editors can look over it and add their comments. Regards, 2016: 1278:. This image description has recently been changed from Western Quoll to Eastern Quoll on Commons. Image for identification please. 1258: 1190: 1151: 1112: 800: 2300:

We should try to follow the consensus of recent taxonomic literature; the IUCN may be out of date or idiosyncratic. In the case of

4093:. If I'm wrong on this, I'll back off, but my understanding is that double-tagging is a colossal waste of time. Please advise. 3725:(editing the configuration of current projects coming soon). Unlike the previous tool, all changes will be effective immediately. 4277: 4059: 2893: 853: 848: 4067: 3734: 3515:

were commonly known as olingos which is why the two words have commonly been used interchangeably. As of yesterday there is a

2432:

claims that the ancestry issue is still not resolved (and that the original motive for domestication is still unclear), while

4571: 4218: 3679: 1204: 704: 684: 548: 4107:

I would only do this for species not breeds of equine, if even then. For breeds and landraces of domestics, it's overkill.

998: 4261: 4015: 3553: 3549: 3298:

There has clearly been a dispute over whether such as list is useful. My suggestion is to place it in your userspace, say

3225: 3175:

I just wanted to alert you that there is a WikiProject proposal about something related to you project. Here is the link.

285:

where proposals for wikiprojects are vetted. I suspect the wikiproject "prehistoric mammals" would be easily deletable at

2759:) because it was long over due for some serious revisions. If anyone wants to contribute making it better, let me know!-- 4589: 2990: 2631:

a member of the extinct order of Multituberculata. It is within the suborder of Cimolodonta, and the family Kogaionidae.

2210: 772: 670: 609:

split up by every fifty years or some other time criterion. Or, perhaps splitting it up is not necessary. Thanks! --

3879: 2527:

mentions some Pleistocene records too; more may have been found since 1973. I wouldn't trust the PaleoDB very much.

3545: 3299: 2458: 2185: 1920: 1895: 1718: 742: 721: 715: 162: 155: 38: 1550: 4567: 4214: 3460: 2472:

I am having a hard time finding data (Fossil range) for the temporal range template in the taxobox for species:

1414: 730: 4200:

Hello Wikipedians, my name is Sarah and I am part of a group of students who are working to fix the article on

3774: 3703: 2695: 2658: 1219: 1082: 957:), and some other variants. Knowledge shouldn't be choosing any one of these clades as the preferred taxonomy. 4235: 3722: 4273: 3657: 3307: 3282: 3207: 3182: 2807: 2736: 2721: 2154: 2125: 2094: 1847:, so I think we can assume you're correct to have deleted it. Thanks for the research on the other species. 1605: 1028: 984: 911: 497: 2642:"Based on comparisons with the m1s from Vãlioara, the holotype of Barbatodon is regarded as a kogaionid m1" 2218: 1576:

Sorry Kaldari I got very side tracked by real world zoo issues, Some massive flooding at one of our zoo's.

1520: 3629: 3431: 3425: 3407: 3221: 3100: 2588: 2573: 2547: 2515: 2489: 1644: 1490:) make up a large amount of the article. Input from members of this wikiproject would be highly valued. -- 1389: 1344: 1323: 1283: 834: 769: 750: 294: 217: 171: 4303:, which might be of interest to your WikiProject. It will take a while before the category is populated. 4239:

and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my

3718: 2449:

reveals that there were previous attempts to resolve the problem, but they were resisted by an editor of

4606: 4575: 4552: 4541: 4526: 4493: 4466: 4434: 4416: 4402: 4375: 4363: 4312: 4289: 4255: 4222: 4190: 4167: 4142: 4128: 4116: 4101: 4075: 4035: 4031: 3969: 3951: 3932: 3834: 3830: 3794: 3760: 3692: 3665: 3653: 3634: 3603: 3582: 3563: 3539: 3506: 3493: 3473: 3323: 3311: 3290: 3278: 3267: 3254: 3241: 3237: 3203: 3199: 3188: 3164: 3145: 3104: 3082: 3047: 3033: 3009: 2993: 2969: 2955: 2940: 2925: 2910: 2888:

which was created two years ago but never seem to really take off, given the existence of this project,

2874: 2829: 2810: 2768: 2740: 2725: 2699: 2677: 2662: 2592: 2577: 2551: 2536: 2519: 2493: 2462: 2454: 2409: 2390: 2348: 2321: 2293: 2267: 2234: 2199: 2174: 2158: 2130: 2119: 2099: 2066: 2051: 2028: 1993: 1970: 1947: 1925: 1910: 1900: 1885: 1856: 1835: 1790: 1763: 1730: 1706: 1687: 1656: 1638: 1617: 1591: 1571: 1499: 1455: 1438: 1418: 1393: 1372: 1348: 1327: 1309: 1287: 1264: 1252: 1231: 1208: 1170: 1124: 1086: 1033: 1010: 988: 966: 915: 884: 869: 812: 808: 754: 708: 688: 655: 618: 596: 573: 552: 522: 501: 480: 450: 422: 396: 378: 362: 327: 298: 276: 256: 241: 221: 197: 175: 149: 123: 4342:, which aims to clear up the perpetual Knowledge confusion between the wild pig or wild boar (article: 4447:

I'm worried that this could devolve into an issue regarding which mammalian clade you favor. Being a

3818: 1713:

Upon further examination, it appears that a description (P. nigra) was published - one of which is on

4285: 4186: 3688: 3649: 3274: 3160: 2335: 2146: 1943: 1759: 1495: 1410: 1063:

guidelines and conventions, and present them in a "quick-reference" table format, for inclusion into

844: 614: 592: 2932: 4602: 4550: 4414: 4196:

Article: Fox - Educational Assignment for Cornell University: Online Communities - Request for Help

4165: 4140: 4099: 3367: 3078: 3062: 2936: 2906: 2825: 2405: 2263: 2047: 1989: 1810: 1472: 1227: 1162: 1078: 994: 830: 402: 392: 358: 337: 2525: 1697:

is not clear to me, but I agree that for Wiki purposes we should wait for some reputable sources.

833:. I don't think these are terribly useful, and I'm having trouble engaging the editor about them. 4308: 3790: 3750: 3742: 3579: 3560: 3534: 3503: 3470: 3445: 3320: 3303: 3251: 3179: 3141: 3043: 3005: 2965: 2921: 2803: 2764: 2024: 1935: 1745: 1516: 1198: 1139: 1131: 1021: 698: 678: 542: 493: 251: 4390: 2359: 3421: 2038:

The last editor has changed all "initial caps" case English names to lower case in the article

1881:

says that it is Muntiacinae. Which one is correct, or are there two genera with the same name?

768:. Since this has the potential to affect quite a few of our articles it might be worth a look. 3947: 3889: 3624: 3134: 3118: 3112: 2951: 2382: 2364: 2344: 2170: 2115: 2062: 1749: 1726: 1675: 1652: 1613: 1546: 1511: 1385: 1340: 1319: 1279: 1120: 1064: 1047: 1006: 865: 788: 746: 738: 648: 418: 374: 282: 272: 145: 3717:. All of the historical data (back to July 2009 for some projects) has been copied over. The 1382:

File:Dasyurus maculatus -Billabong Koala and Wildlife Park, New South Wales, Australia-8b.jpg

1316:

File:Dasyurus maculatus -Billabong Koala and Wildlife Park, New South Wales, Australia-8a.jpg

4357: 4110: 4050: 4027: 3965: 3939: 3928: 3914: 3904: 3869: 3859: 3845: 3826: 3489: 3389: 3262: 3233: 3220:. This follows similar past efforts by this user, all of which were eventually deleted (see 3026: 2985: 2673: 2561: 2532: 2438: 2433: 2421: 2317: 1966: 1831: 1702: 1667: 1584: 1564: 1483: 1434: 1365: 1302: 1247: 962: 922: 804: 652: 566: 515: 473: 320: 234: 190: 116: 4544:

like an elephant, or at least something really cute and fuzzy-looking like a baby panda.

4281: 4251: 4240: 4182: 3894: 3884: 3684: 3403: 3397: 3393: 3371: 3156: 2397: 2339:

last month, but this species has obviously yet to percolate through to the Red List, etc.

1939: 1852: 1786: 1755: 1532: 1491: 839: 826: 726: 610: 588: 446: 137: 130: 1187:

Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Tree_of_life#Taxonomy_vs_Classification_vs_Systematics_vs.....

2901:

particular WikiProject has not proved the best way to improve their articles. Thoughts?

2086: 2078: 437:

Hi. I'd be grateful if editors which an interest in disambiguation could take a look at

4598: 4545: 4489: 4430: 4409: 4398: 4339: 4160: 4135: 4094: 3822: 3714: 3641: 3618: 3610: 3599: 3074: 2902: 2821: 2401: 2289: 2259: 2214: 2090: 2043: 1985: 1978:

Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Mammals/mammal articles by size

1878: 1683: 1223: 1155: 972: 899: 880: 529:

appearance of scientific names in lead of species articles listed at their common names

388: 354: 263: 1527: 4448: 4304: 4157:

Knowledge:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Undiscussed_page_moves_by_SMcCandlish

4046: 3849: 3786: 3747: 3738: 3576: 3557: 3525: 3500: 3467: 3352: 3317: 3248: 3137: 3066: 3039: 3001: 2961: 2917: 2843: 2837: 2760: 2232: 2020: 1909:. Which one are we going to go with, though? It is now inconsistent across articles. 1244:

needs revisiting. Two years have passed since the taxonomic changes were proposed. —

1194: 946: 694: 674: 538: 406: 286: 3960:

Excellent, thanks for the quick response! (not surprised about the lab mouse ...) --

3519:

which is not an olingo. It seems to me that there should now be an brief article at

1339:. From the white spots in its fur, I think that this is the same individual animal. 3943: 2947: 2862: 2853: 2477: 2340: 2330: 2166: 2111: 2058: 1722: 1648: 1609: 1542: 1116: 1002: 861: 838:

references, but I don't think they make good external links. Any thoughts? thanks,

644: 414: 370: 268: 141: 3359:... but I'll create that article as a redirect anyway...) Replace the redirect at 693:

e.g. a note on capitalisation and the last discussion etc. might be a good start.

4276:

and its subcategories are accepted by the project. There is a similar issue with

3202:? Ostensibly a list of mammal genera, it has recently been edited extensively by 1907: 281:

Wikiprojects are supposed to have support before creation... hence why there's a

3961: 3924: 3485: 3456: 3360: 3346: 3019: 2980: 2713: 2669: 2557: 2528: 2446: 2373: 2313: 2004: 1962: 1827: 1698: 1624: 1577: 1557: 1487: 1479: 1430: 1377: 1358: 1295: 1191:

Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Plants#General_structure_for_plant_articles_and_lists

958: 954: 938: 559: 508: 466: 313: 227: 183: 109: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

4247: 3726: 2687: 2647: 2616: 2609: 1848: 1782: 1774: 1671: 1452: 1100: 1001:

for further discussion, specifically regarding deprecation of Pegasoferae. --

950: 934: 628: 442: 4055: 743:

Wikipedia_talk:GLAM/ARKive#WP:SAYWHEREYOUGOTIT_when_writing_in-line_citations

4519: 4485: 4459: 4426: 4394: 4351: 4347: 4343: 3874: 3806: 3595: 3356: 2871: 2791: 2387: 2285: 1822: 1804: 1679: 1631: 926: 876: 3363:

with a small article describing the genus and the recent changes by Helgen.

2898:

Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Prehistoric Mammals

2437:

One would think (as an uninvolved lay observer) that the view described on

1647:

also created by the same Wiki author and cites the same "taxon authority".

1443:

I've worked around Elk for decades and no one in the states ever calls the

1242:

Knowledge talk:WikiProject Mammals/Archive 6#Changing the taxonomy of cats

875:

several. Many more need to be reviewed and judged and deleted if wanting.

4389:

should be replaced with something cleaner, such as (but not necessarily)

4023: 3994: 3983: 3814: 3810: 3216:), apparently in an attempt to turn it into a complete list of mammalian 2783: 2752: 2280: 2248: 2222: 2039: 1816: 1714: 976: 942: 903: 584: 4014:

could be displayed in the respective article talk pages and a notice at

3710: 1748:

describes a limited opportunity for Knowledge editors to have access to

1662: 766:

are unhappy with the biological use of the symbol † to denote extinction

4090: 3702:

As of January, the popular pages tool has moved from the Toolserver to

2501: 1870: 1022:

WT:TOL#The biggest clades of them all...which ones belong on Knowledge?

438: 4085:

This is a cross-posted message at Knowledge talk:WikiProject Council:

2646:

m1 = "mammal"? multituberculate? Martian? Could somebody please edit

4452: 4019: 3990: 3979: 3342: 2799: 2450: 2442: 2429: 2425: 2377: 1039:

Request for Comment: Capitalization of common names of animal species

734: 640: 633: 3247:

I say revert his efforts and nudge him gently to reform his ways. -

1674:. They should be reverted until the species are reliably accepted. 825:

An editor is adding links to many mammal species articles, such as

401:

I'd suggest that the best approach is to propose the creation of a

4201: 2358: 2106: 1778: 930: 627: 4386: 1337:

File:Dasyurus geoffroii -Billabong Koala and Wildlife Park-8b.jpg

1276:

File:Dasyurus geoffroii -Billabong Koala and Wildlife Park-8a.jpg

2787: 2275: 2252: 1694: 1065:

the guidelines for the capitalization of common names of species

898:

carnivores and the perissodactyls as the "Pegasoferae", appears

4328: 2795: 1539: 1444: 1429:, which is more commonly known as the "elk" in North America. 1042: 25: 2085:

and I'm having troubles matching the bovid in the photo with

933:) and Chiroptera + Ferae + Perissodactyla + Cetartiodactyla ( 2503:

right, the temporal range would be 'Pleistocene to Recent';

937:, although we have an article claiming this clade is called 2916:

I think it should just be redirected to the paleo project.

2011:. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets 1844:, and this IP's only other edit, also at the same article: 1146:. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets 1107:. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets 941:). Various analysis have supported Ferae + Perissodactyla ( 795:. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets 226:

My error I was aiming it at the user who created the mess.

1841:

Here's the anon IP edit that changed "gerbil" to "Sumal":

4155:

Issue at ANI that may be of interest to project members:

3844:

After some heavy work a while ago to rescue and clean up

3640:

I looked through and revised the Taxonomy section of the

1802:

shows that "desert rat" has been used for kangaroo rats (

1218:

Today, someone created an article about this rat, called

671:

Knowledge:WikiProject_Birds#Bird_names_and_article_titles

4041:

Royal Society journals - subscription offer for one year

3125:

If you would, please do comment on the recent move from

2756: 741:. Contributions to advance the discussion at welcome at 441:

and let me know their thoughts on its talk page. Thanks

3229: 1845: 1842: 1533:

http://awwp.alwabra.com/index.php/content/view/1641/30/

4346:), and feral domesticated pigs (proposed article name 4066:, but later applications will go on the waiting list. 4012:

Knowledge:WikiProject Dinosaurs/Dinosaur collaboration

665:

I was going to place a note concerning the outcome of

558:

Thats got to be the longest title I have ever seen :P

138:

Talk:Copulation#Should_the_Copulation_article_exist.3F

131:

Talk:Copulation#Should_the_Copulation_article_exist.3F

4179:

Knowledge:Featured article candidates/Rodent/archive1

3155:

as distinct species, like IUCN and Chambers et al. .

3674:

Taxonomic classification of two species of fruit bat

2124:

Thanks! Yeah, the list is out of date by 12 months.

1623:

There is no mention of it on Google Scholar. Maybe

4207:If you're curious about our assignment here it is: 3713:, will become available over the next few weeks at 2626:

is a mammal genus from the Upper Cretaceous period.

1773:Could someone with rodent expertise take a look at 1528:

http://www.bucknell.edu/msw3/browse.asp?id=14200570

1053:Hello WikiProject members and others. As part of a 971:That was my suspicion. It's clear, then, that the 4301:Category:Mammals articles needing expert attention 2396:That does look about right. I've only come across 1468:Knowledge:Peer_review/Transitional_fossil/archive1 639:Does anyone know how to tell apart the two living 3805:I'm proposing to merge 3-4 stubs on molar cusps: 2480:). Any assistance would be greatly appreciated. 1721:. Have to examine the literature further though. 1177:Taxonomy vs Classification vs Systematics vs..... 3594:I'd like to revive this idea, is anyone game? -- 3177:Knowledge:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Humanity 537:to get an idea of whether we should streamline. 353:The portal was the best thing I could think of. 182:wikiprojects and portals that serve no purpose. 3589:Knowledge:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Rabbits 507:Was this dealt with? Did it have a conclusion? 344:cared in the slightest. Obscure dinosaurs that 4064:Initial applications will close on 25 May 2014 3441:Update related pages and templates as needed: 1717:- and the holotype skin is deposited with the 1538:There's also a stub on the Spanish Knowledge: 3133:and what it means for other articles such as 2400:in MG but I don't think this is one. Cheers, 2308:is no longer considered valid (references in 945:), Ferae + Perissodactyla + Cetartiodactyla ( 8: 4026:(placental inclusive) to B class. Thoughts? 3453:List_of_placental_mammals_in_Order_Carnivora 764:There is a discussion going on where people 492:content in dispute that would be wonderful. 4588:I am the Education Committee Chair for the 4340:Talk:Razorback#Requested move November 2014 4018:as well? A specific goal could be to bring 3778:, which is within your project's scope, is 1820:among others), and another African murine ( 603:List of fatal bear attacks in North America 3978:Proposed "Collaboration of the month" for 136:You may want to participate in the RFC at 4334:Pointer to relevant discussion elsewhere. 3920:on the relevant page above? Many thanks. 1540:http://es.wikipedia.org/Gazella_erlangeri 4393:. Does anyone oppose changing the icon? 2445:(which are, however, more specialised). 1059:We wish to clarify and confirm existing 953:), Chiroptera + Ferae + Perissodactyla ( 2849: 2780:Category:Top-importance mammal articles 2188:has been nominated for GA reassessment 1873:states that the subfamily of the genus 1604:Does anyone know about the validity of 2751:Hi I just did a major revision to the 2310:User:Ucucha/List of mammals/Chiroptera 2034:Capitalization of common English names 1095:Featured article review for Island fox 999:Template talk:Laurasiatheria Cladogram 817: 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 4228:Comment on the WikiProject X proposal 3840:Help needed to classify some articles 3801:Request for comments on merging stubs 2093:in the background for scale. Thanks! 1715:http://anwaruddinchoudhury.hpage.com/ 1509:It looks like we have no article for 949:), Perissodactyla + Cetartiodactyla ( 208:create this thing. IP editors indeed 7: 3554:User:UtherSRG/Western lowland olingo 3550:User:UtherSRG/Eastern lowland olingo 3226:Classification of all Living Mammals 3095:has been nominated for deletion. -- 1237:Changing the taxonomy of cats, redux 289:due to not being properly proposed. 3780:This week's article for improvement 3093:File:Afro-asiatic Camelid Range.jpg 3088:File:Afro-asiatic Camelid Range.jpg 2778:The original rating of articles in 2668:m1 means the lower first molar. -- 2386:correct or is it something else? -- 310:MfD/WikiProject Prehistoric Mammals 3709:Web tools, to replace the ones at 2886:WP:WikiProject Prehistoric Mammals 2209:I am concerned by the merging of " 2083:Mesker Park Zoo and Botanic Garden 1556:I guess I will give it a shot :) 860:with the editor pans out, myself. 24: 18:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Mammals 4564:now covers all species of mammals 4056:Royal Society Publishing webpages 3575:I've made the moves and edits. - 3018:Yes I think so FunkMonk. Regards 2731:Bueller?... Bueller?... Bueller? 2428:blatantly contradict each other: 2380:. It was struck by a vehicle. Is 2278:. I looked at both for the genus 1976:Notice of deletion discussion at 1189:It follows on from discussion at 4323: 2861: 2852: 2757:http://en.wikipedia.org/Ungulate 2372:I took this picture of a fox in 1505:No article for Neumann's Gazelle 1046: 457: 411:WP:WikiProject Council/Proposals 405:either here at WP:Mammals or at 29: 3855:The following pages transclude 3737:or contact me on my talk page. 3617:I've recently greatly expanded 2880:WikiProject Prehistoric Mammals 2818:top 25 most viewed mammal pages 2057:That is the current consensus. 1462:Transitional Fossil peer-review 4223:20:28, 25 September 2014 (UTC) 4191:12:25, 11 September 2014 (UTC) 4177:Rodent is currently at FAC at 4045:I'm delighted to say that the 3680:Talk:Dark tube-nosed fruit bat 2794:was rated more important than 2391:15:18, 17 September 2012 (UTC) 2349:18:08, 10 September 2012 (UTC) 2322:16:15, 10 September 2012 (UTC) 2294:15:38, 10 September 2012 (UTC) 2268:13:33, 10 September 2012 (UTC) 1171:18:10, 27 September 2011 (UTC) 1125:10:00, 21 September 2011 (UTC) 1087:03:43, 16 September 2011 (UTC) 1034:17:34, 15 September 2011 (UTC) 885:01:19, 15 September 2011 (UTC) 870:21:44, 14 September 2011 (UTC) 854:17:19, 14 September 2011 (UTC) 818:External links: Smithsonian's 813:13:11, 14 September 2011 (UTC) 1: 4576:13:21, 21 December 2014 (UTC) 4527:11:38, 30 November 2014 (UTC) 4494:11:19, 30 November 2014 (UTC) 4467:09:35, 30 November 2014 (UTC) 4435:08:51, 30 November 2014 (UTC) 4417:04:05, 30 November 2014 (UTC) 4403:01:10, 30 November 2014 (UTC) 4355: 4209:Online Communities Assignment 4108: 4081:Parent-child project tagging? 3797:, on behalf of the TAFI team 3761:05:15, 23 February 2014 (UTC) 3693:14:51, 31 December 2013 (UTC) 3678:I've started a discussion at 3609:Could someone take a look at 3546:User:UtherSRG/Northern olingo 3300:User:Connon.burgin/Mammallist 2994:02:08, 25 February 2013 (UTC) 2979:that manner WP:Extinction. -- 2970:17:20, 24 February 2013 (UTC) 2956:17:31, 24 February 2013 (UTC) 2941:17:15, 24 February 2013 (UTC) 2926:17:07, 24 February 2013 (UTC) 2911:17:00, 24 February 2013 (UTC) 2769:22:08, 16 February 2013 (UTC) 2726:06:44, 13 November 2012 (UTC) 2712:Could someone take a look at 2410:13:04, 10 December 2012 (UTC) 2251:not to appear in the list of 1906:It seems both are valid; see 1500:00:37, 23 February 2012 (UTC) 1456:18:51, 21 February 2012 (UTC) 1439:12:29, 21 February 2012 (UTC) 1419:11:58, 21 February 2012 (UTC) 1209:10:40, 27 November 2011 (UTC) 4590:Society for Marine Mammalogy 4553:20:24, 1 December 2014 (UTC) 4387:the icon of this WikiProject 4376:12:40, 7 November 2014 (UTC) 4313:16:31, 12 October 2014 (UTC) 4213:Hope to hear from you soon! 3910:, which should then replace 3719:tool to view historical data 3666:04:19, 29 October 2013 (UTC) 3604:17:54, 13 October 2013 (UTC) 3000:So, can we redirect it now? 2870:Can anyone identify them? -- 2741:02:43, 20 January 2013 (UTC) 2700:20:00, 4 November 2012 (UTC) 2678:01:29, 1 November 2012 (UTC) 2663:00:08, 1 November 2012 (UTC) 2593:07:43, 29 October 2012 (UTC) 2578:07:33, 29 October 2012 (UTC) 2552:00:22, 28 October 2012 (UTC) 2537:21:27, 27 October 2012 (UTC) 2520:21:01, 27 October 2012 (UTC) 2505:if I am reading this wrong, 2494:13:45, 24 October 2012 (UTC) 2463:11:05, 12 October 2012 (UTC) 2211:Tammar sudden death syndrome 2205:Tammar sudden death syndrome 2009:featured article review here 1394:10:31, 27 January 2012 (UTC) 1373:00:31, 26 January 2012 (UTC) 1349:23:15, 25 January 2012 (UTC) 1328:14:02, 24 January 2012 (UTC) 1310:13:24, 24 January 2012 (UTC) 1288:13:16, 24 January 2012 (UTC) 1232:01:52, 8 December 2011 (UTC) 1144:featured article review here 1105:featured article review here 793:featured article review here 413:might also be able to help. 4607:09:31, 7 January 2015 (UTC) 4290:09:21, 7 October 2014 (UTC) 4256:22:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC) 4243:. Thank you for your time! 3583:15:45, 18 August 2013 (UTC) 3564:16:20, 16 August 2013 (UTC) 3540:15:46, 16 August 2013 (UTC) 3507:04:57, 16 August 2013 (UTC) 3494:04:49, 16 August 2013 (UTC) 3474:04:30, 16 August 2013 (UTC) 3324:04:53, 16 August 2013 (UTC) 3255:04:48, 16 August 2013 (UTC) 2276:Mammal Species of the World 1676:Mammal Species of the World 1265:00:09, 6 January 2012 (UTC) 1027:Please see the link above. 1011:23:03, 3 October 2011 (UTC) 989:03:41, 30 August 2011 (UTC) 967:20:24, 29 August 2011 (UTC) 916:15:31, 29 August 2011 (UTC) 778:20:33, 25 August 2011 (UTC) 161:A new portal has appeared, 4622: 4321: 4076:03:10, 29 April 2014 (UTC) 4068:Wiki at Royal Society John 4036:23:04, 31 March 2014 (UTC) 3970:22:09, 29 March 2014 (UTC) 3952:21:48, 29 March 2014 (UTC) 3933:20:47, 29 March 2014 (UTC) 3865:but are not linked by it: 3835:03:34, 25 March 2014 (UTC) 3795:05:58, 13 March 2014 (UTC) 3312:17:17, 8 August 2013 (UTC) 3291:17:04, 8 August 2013 (UTC) 3242:03:16, 6 August 2013 (UTC) 2875:15:43, 19 March 2013 (UTC) 2811:18:00, 16 March 2013 (UTC) 2240:Species not listed by IUCN 2186:North American river otter 2067:19:48, 25 April 2012 (UTC) 2052:19:21, 25 April 2012 (UTC) 2029:01:12, 22 April 2012 (UTC) 1994:06:11, 19 April 2012 (UTC) 1971:23:28, 18 April 2012 (UTC) 1956:Pocket pets and lagomorphs 1948:07:18, 10 April 2012 (UTC) 1926:06:00, 10 April 2012 (UTC) 1901:04:25, 10 April 2012 (UTC) 1731:05:39, 31 March 2012 (UTC) 1719:Zoological Survey of India 1707:23:41, 14 March 2012 (UTC) 1688:23:35, 14 March 2012 (UTC) 1657:05:11, 14 March 2012 (UTC) 1639:04:54, 14 March 2012 (UTC) 1618:04:24, 14 March 2012 (UTC) 661:Where to put a decision... 451:10:12, 29 April 2011 (UTC) 423:15:37, 23 April 2011 (UTC) 397:15:06, 23 April 2011 (UTC) 379:14:36, 23 April 2011 (UTC) 363:14:27, 23 April 2011 (UTC) 328:08:05, 11 April 2011 (UTC) 308:Nominated for deletion at 299:04:57, 11 April 2011 (UTC) 277:16:05, 10 April 2011 (UTC) 257:15:37, 10 April 2011 (UTC) 242:07:43, 11 April 2011 (UTC) 222:04:56, 11 April 2011 (UTC) 212:create such pages at all. 198:14:16, 10 April 2011 (UTC) 176:08:09, 10 April 2011 (UTC) 163:Portal:Prehistoric mammals 156:Portal:Prehistoric mammals 4594:WikiEducation Course Page 4168:18:26, 10 July 2014 (UTC) 4143:03:34, 10 July 2014 (UTC) 4129:02:53, 10 July 2014 (UTC) 4102:23:47, 25 June 2014 (UTC) 3880:Crawford-Cabral's dasymys 3698:Popular pages tool update 3635:23:22, 10 July 2013 (UTC) 3461:List of mammals of Brazil 3410:, and rewrite to include 3374:, and rewrite to include 3189:21:48, 29 July 2013 (UTC) 3083:15:08, 8 April 2013 (UTC) 2890:WikiProject Palaeontology 2830:15:36, 8 April 2013 (UTC) 2235:17:03, 30 June 2012 (UTC) 2200:18:47, 29 June 2012 (UTC) 2013:featured article criteria 1857:17:03, 6 April 2012 (UTC) 1836:12:26, 6 April 2012 (UTC) 1791:12:10, 6 April 2012 (UTC) 1764:18:14, 5 April 2012 (UTC) 1678:does not recognize them. 1592:10:43, 6 March 2012 (UTC) 1572:09:59, 4 March 2012 (UTC) 1551:04:53, 2 March 2012 (UTC) 1214:The Tokunoshima spiny rat 1148:featured article criteria 1109:featured article criteria 797:featured article criteria 755:09:43, 29 July 2011 (UTC) 731:South Asian River Dolphin 709:20:51, 21 July 2011 (UTC) 689:20:51, 21 July 2011 (UTC) 656:22:52, 17 July 2011 (UTC) 597:06:13, 15 June 2011 (UTC) 150:13:40, 9 April 2011 (UTC) 124:13:18, 5 April 2011 (UTC) 103:While The Arbiter is away 4581:Marine Mammal WikiSprint 4236:review the proposal here 3989:Hi all. I'm amazed that 3775:Rare breed (agriculture) 3165:13:02, 4 July 2013 (UTC) 3146:06:43, 4 July 2013 (UTC) 3105:02:59, 27 May 2013 (UTC) 3048:15:19, 18 May 2013 (UTC) 3034:12:09, 18 May 2013 (UTC) 3010:22:03, 17 May 2013 (UTC) 2708:Ferret phylogeny dispute 2175:09:41, 18 May 2012 (UTC) 2159:07:31, 18 May 2012 (UTC) 2139:Southern Brown Bandicoot 1862:Muntiacinae and Cervinae 1627:would know for certain. 1270:Eastern or Western Quoll 1220:Tokudaia tokunoshimensis 1069:Please take a moment to 619:18:48, 7 July 2011 (UTC) 574:12:11, 8 June 2011 (UTC) 553:01:10, 3 June 2011 (UTC) 523:12:29, 8 June 2011 (UTC) 481:12:12, 8 June 2011 (UTC) 332:Prehistoric Mammals are 4299:This is a notice about 4274:Category:Mammal anatomy 3058:Sumatran rhinoceros TFA 2884:Hi guys. I came across 2786:is top importance, but 2774:top importance articles 2420:Currently the articles 2131:07:25, 6 May 2012 (UTC) 2120:05:18, 6 May 2012 (UTC) 2100:03:51, 6 May 2012 (UTC) 1606:Petaurista mechukaensis 1504: 1409:deer" (Cervus elaphus). 502:00:59, 3 May 2011 (UTC) 433:Disambiguation opinions 4562:The English Knowledge 4278:WikiProject Physiology 4016:WP:WikiProject Animals 3432:Western lowland olingo 3426:Eastern lowland olingo 3408:Eastern lowland olingo 3351:(I wish he'd named it 2894:WikiProject Extinction 2714:Talk:Ferret#Decendence 2524:That appears correct. 2369: 1808:), multimammate rats ( 1645:Petaurista mishmiensis 893:Laurasiathere taxonomy 820:North American Mammals 636: 487:Coyote article dispute 4542:charismatic megafauna 4060:the applications page 3715:toollabs:popularpages 3332:Olingos and Olinguito 3268:List of mammal genera 2500:If I am reading this: 2416:Descent of the ferret 2362: 927:10.1093/molbev/msn104 631: 42:of past discussions. 4568:Flamthonas FIrearrow 4215:MSarahKurahashiSofue 3511:Until yesterday all 3222:List of Every Mammal 3171:WikiProject Proposal 3151:Some authors retain 2336:Euroscaptor subanura 2073:Bovid identification 1600:Description validity 4262:WikiProject Anatomy 3704:Wikimedia Tool Labs 3368:Bushy-tailed olingo 3110:Recent change from 3063:Sumatran rhinoceros 2820:as top importance. 2782:was quite odd. The 2635:All clear so far - 2608:"m1" = "mammal" in 2507:please let me know! 2306:Carollia colombiana 1877:is Cervinae, while 1811:Mastomys natalensis 1473:Transitional fossil 1185:sections listed at 995:Talk:Laurasiatheria 831:American black bear 722:WP:SAYWHEREYOUGOTIT 716:WP:SAYWHEREYOUGOTIT 338:Portal:Paleontology 3484:with the olingos. 3416:B. medius siccatus 2474:Petaurus breviceps 2370: 2127:Bob the WikipediaN 2096:Bob the WikipediaN 2087:one of these names 1746:Knowledge:HighBeam 1741:Knowledge:HighBeam 1521:Erlanger’s Gazelle 1140:Bottlenose dolphin 1132:Bottlenose Dolphin 1030:Bob the WikipediaN 714:Interpretation of 637: 4246: 4091:conversation here 4022:to GA status and 4007:Main article:____ 3890:Tanzanian dasymys 3772:Please note that 3669: 3652:comment added by 3294: 3277:comment added by 3198:What to do about 3135:Canis rufus rufus 3127:Canis lupus rufus 3119:Canis rufus rufus 3113:Canis lupus rufus 2686:Thanks! Editing 2650:to clarify this? 2595: 2510:~Thanks, ~Eric F 2496: 2398:crab-eating foxes 2383:Lycalopex vetulus 2365:Lycalopex vetulus 2149:comment added by 2003:I have nominated 1924: 1899: 1750:HighBeam Research 1517:Neumann's Gazelle 1512:Gazella erlangeri 1427:Cervus canadensis 1262: 1138:I have nominated 1099:I have nominated 1092: 1091: 1073:, and comment at 852: 789:Homo floresiensis 787:I have nominated 739:Bornean orangutan 649:Philippine colugo 100: 99: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 4613: 4548: 4525: 4522: 4465: 4462: 4412: 4374: 4335: 4327: 4326: 4295:Expert attention 4244: 4163: 4138: 4127: 4097: 4051:National Academy 3940:Laboratory mouse 3919: 3913: 3909: 3903: 3870:Laboratory mouse 3864: 3858: 3846:Template:Murinae 3819:Paracone (tooth) 3817:, and (perhaps) 3758: 3711:tools:~alexz/pop 3683:appreciated. -- 3668: 3646: 3633: 3627: 3537: 3532: 3450: 3444: 3422:Beddard's olingo 3293: 3271: 3194:List of species? 3031: 3024: 2988: 2983: 2865: 2856: 2816:I've listed the 2808:Talk to Madeline 2583: 2484: 2482:~Thanks, ~Eric F 2455:Florian Blaschke 2439:European polecat 2434:European polecat 2422:European polecat 2331:reliable sources 2231: 2227: 2197: 2195:Ten Pound Hammer 2161: 2128: 2097: 1934:See my reply at 1918: 1916: 1913: 1893: 1891: 1888: 1799:Google Scholar ( 1668:Flying squirrels 1637: 1634: 1589: 1582: 1569: 1562: 1484:Tiktaalik roseae 1370: 1363: 1307: 1300: 1263: 1257: 1256: 1167: 1160: 1050: 1043: 1031: 842: 775: 770:Sabine's Sunbird 571: 564: 520: 513: 478: 471: 465: 461: 460: 407:WP:Palaeontology 325: 318: 239: 232: 195: 188: 121: 114: 78: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 4621: 4620: 4616: 4615: 4614: 4612: 4611: 4610: 4583: 4560: 4558:Missing mammals 4546: 4520: 4516: 4460: 4456: 4410: 4383: 4372: 4350:, presently at 4336: 4333: 4331: 4324: 4320: 4297: 4265: 4230: 4198: 4175: 4161: 4153: 4136: 4125: 4095: 4083: 4043: 4028:--Animalparty-- 3987: 3917: 3911: 3907: 3901: 3895:Yunnan hadromys 3885:Rwandan dasymys 3862: 3856: 3842: 3827:--Animalparty-- 3803: 3768: 3746: 3700: 3676: 3647: 3623: 3622: 3615: 3602: 3592: 3535: 3526: 3448: 3442: 3398:Northern olingo 3394:Chiriqui olingo 3390:Harris's olingo 3372:Northern olingo 3334: 3272: 3196: 3173: 3123: 3090: 3060: 3027: 3020: 2986: 2981: 2882: 2866: 2857: 2848: 2776: 2749: 2710: 2692:186.221.135.185 2655:186.221.135.185 2614: 2470: 2418: 2376:, northeast of 2357: 2355:Fox to identify 2242: 2229: 2223: 2207: 2193: 2183: 2144: 2141: 2126: 2095: 2075: 2036: 2001: 1981: 1958: 1914: 1911: 1889: 1886: 1864: 1771: 1743: 1632: 1628: 1602: 1585: 1578: 1565: 1558: 1507: 1464: 1411:Sylwia Ufnalska 1406: 1366: 1359: 1303: 1296: 1272: 1251: 1245: 1239: 1216: 1179: 1163: 1156: 1136: 1097: 1071:visit the draft 1061:uncontroversial 1041: 1029: 1025: 895: 835:WP:LINKSTOAVOID 823: 785: 773: 762: 727:Giant Armadillo 719: 663: 626: 606: 582: 567: 560: 531: 516: 509: 489: 474: 467: 458: 456: 435: 321: 314: 235: 228: 191: 184: 159: 134: 117: 110: 105: 74: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 4619: 4617: 4582: 4579: 4559: 4556: 4538: 4537: 4536: 4535: 4534: 4533: 4532: 4531: 4530: 4529: 4503: 4502: 4501: 4500: 4499: 4498: 4497: 4496: 4474: 4473: 4472: 4471: 4470: 4469: 4440: 4439: 4438: 4437: 4420: 4419: 4382: 4379: 4370: 4322: 4319: 4316: 4296: 4293: 4264: 4259: 4229: 4226: 4197: 4194: 4174: 4171: 4152: 4149: 4148: 4147: 4146: 4145: 4123: 4082: 4079: 4042: 4039: 3986: 3976: 3975: 3974: 3973: 3972: 3955: 3954: 3898: 3897: 3892: 3887: 3882: 3877: 3872: 3841: 3838: 3823:Talk:Protocone 3802: 3799: 3785: 3783: 3771: 3767: 3764: 3699: 3696: 3675: 3672: 3671: 3670: 3642:Japanese serow 3619:Japanese serow 3614: 3611:Japanese serow 3607: 3598: 3591: 3586: 3573: 3572: 3571: 3570: 3569: 3568: 3567: 3566: 3465: 3464: 3439: 3428: 3418: 3404:Allen's olingo 3400: 3386: 3376:B. richardsoni 3364: 3333: 3330: 3329: 3328: 3327: 3326: 3260: 3258: 3257: 3195: 3192: 3172: 3169: 3168: 3167: 3122: 3108: 3089: 3086: 3059: 3056: 3055: 3054: 3053: 3052: 3051: 3050: 3013: 3012: 2997: 2996: 2976: 2975: 2974: 2973: 2972: 2943: 2881: 2878: 2868: 2867: 2860: 2858: 2851: 2847: 2834: 2833: 2832: 2775: 2772: 2748: 2745: 2744: 2743: 2709: 2706: 2705: 2704: 2703: 2702: 2681: 2680: 2644: 2643: 2633: 2632: 2628: 2627: 2613: 2606: 2605: 2604: 2603: 2602: 2601: 2600: 2599: 2598: 2597: 2596: 2580: 2469: 2468:Temporal range 2466: 2417: 2414: 2413: 2412: 2356: 2353: 2352: 2351: 2325: 2324: 2297: 2296: 2258: 2256: 2245: 2241: 2238: 2215:Tammar wallaby 2206: 2203: 2182: 2179: 2178: 2177: 2140: 2137: 2136: 2135: 2134: 2133: 2091:Indian Peafowl 2074: 2071: 2070: 2069: 2035: 2032: 2000: 1997: 1980: 1974: 1957: 1954: 1953: 1952: 1951: 1950: 1929: 1928: 1879:Indian muntjac 1863: 1860: 1839: 1838: 1797: 1770: 1767: 1753: 1742: 1739: 1738: 1737: 1736: 1735: 1734: 1733: 1711: 1710: 1709: 1661:I checked the 1601: 1598: 1597: 1596: 1595: 1594: 1536: 1535: 1530: 1506: 1503: 1486:), cetaceans ( 1482:), tetrapods ( 1476: 1475: 1470: 1463: 1460: 1459: 1458: 1441: 1405: 1402: 1401: 1400: 1399: 1398: 1397: 1396: 1333: 1332: 1331: 1330: 1271: 1268: 1238: 1235: 1215: 1212: 1178: 1175: 1135: 1130:Nomination of 1128: 1096: 1093: 1090: 1089: 1079:Anna Frodesiak 1051: 1040: 1037: 1024: 1019: 1018: 1017: 1016: 1015: 1014: 1013: 973:laurasiatheria 894: 891: 890: 889: 888: 887: 822: 816: 784: 781: 761: 760:use of symbols 758: 718: 712: 662: 659: 625: 622: 605: 600: 581: 578: 577: 576: 530: 527: 526: 525: 488: 485: 484: 483: 434: 431: 430: 429: 428: 427: 426: 425: 306: 305: 304: 303: 302: 301: 264:Portal:Mammals 259: 248: 247: 246: 245: 244: 158: 153: 133: 127: 104: 101: 98: 97: 92: 89: 84: 79: 72: 67: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4618: 4609: 4608: 4604: 4600: 4596: 4595: 4591: 4586: 4580: 4578: 4577: 4573: 4569: 4565: 4557: 4555: 4554: 4551: 4549: 4543: 4528: 4524: 4523: 4513: 4512: 4511: 4510: 4509: 4508: 4507: 4506: 4505: 4504: 4495: 4491: 4487: 4482: 4481: 4480: 4479: 4478: 4477: 4476: 4475: 4468: 4464: 4463: 4454: 4450: 4449:strepsirrhine 4446: 4445: 4444: 4443: 4442: 4441: 4436: 4432: 4428: 4424: 4423: 4422: 4421: 4418: 4415: 4413: 4407: 4406: 4405: 4404: 4400: 4396: 4392: 4388: 4380: 4378: 4377: 4368: 4365: 4362: 4360: 4353: 4349: 4345: 4341: 4330: 4317: 4315: 4314: 4310: 4306: 4302: 4294: 4292: 4291: 4287: 4283: 4279: 4275: 4270: 4263: 4260: 4258: 4257: 4253: 4249: 4242: 4238: 4237: 4227: 4225: 4224: 4220: 4216: 4211: 4210: 4205: 4203: 4195: 4193: 4192: 4188: 4184: 4180: 4172: 4170: 4169: 4166: 4164: 4158: 4150: 4144: 4141: 4139: 4132: 4131: 4130: 4121: 4118: 4115: 4113: 4106: 4105: 4104: 4103: 4100: 4098: 4092: 4086: 4080: 4078: 4077: 4073: 4069: 4065: 4061: 4057: 4052: 4048: 4047:Royal Society 4040: 4038: 4037: 4033: 4029: 4025: 4021: 4017: 4013: 4008: 4004: 4000: 3996: 3992: 3985: 3981: 3977: 3971: 3967: 3963: 3959: 3958: 3957: 3956: 3953: 3949: 3945: 3941: 3937: 3936: 3935: 3934: 3930: 3926: 3921: 3916: 3906: 3896: 3893: 3891: 3888: 3886: 3883: 3881: 3878: 3876: 3873: 3871: 3868: 3867: 3866: 3861: 3853: 3851: 3847: 3839: 3837: 3836: 3832: 3828: 3824: 3820: 3816: 3812: 3808: 3800: 3798: 3796: 3792: 3788: 3781: 3777: 3776: 3766:An invitation 3765: 3763: 3762: 3757: 3756: 3754: 3749: 3744: 3740: 3736: 3731: 3728: 3724: 3720: 3716: 3712: 3707: 3705: 3697: 3695: 3694: 3690: 3686: 3681: 3673: 3667: 3663: 3659: 3655: 3654:Connor.burgin 3651: 3643: 3639: 3638: 3637: 3636: 3631: 3626: 3620: 3612: 3608: 3606: 3605: 3601: 3597: 3590: 3587: 3585: 3584: 3581: 3578: 3565: 3562: 3559: 3555: 3551: 3547: 3543: 3542: 3541: 3538: 3533: 3531: 3530: 3522: 3518: 3514: 3510: 3509: 3508: 3505: 3502: 3497: 3496: 3495: 3491: 3487: 3483: 3478: 3477: 3476: 3475: 3472: 3469: 3462: 3458: 3454: 3447: 3440: 3437: 3433: 3429: 3427: 3423: 3419: 3417: 3413: 3409: 3405: 3401: 3399: 3395: 3391: 3387: 3385: 3381: 3377: 3373: 3369: 3365: 3362: 3358: 3354: 3353:Little olingo 3350: 3348: 3344: 3339: 3338: 3337: 3331: 3325: 3322: 3319: 3315: 3314: 3313: 3309: 3305: 3301: 3297: 3296: 3295: 3292: 3288: 3284: 3280: 3279:Connor.burgin 3276: 3269: 3264: 3256: 3253: 3250: 3246: 3245: 3244: 3243: 3239: 3235: 3231: 3227: 3223: 3219: 3215: 3212: 3209: 3205: 3204:Connor.burgin 3201: 3193: 3191: 3190: 3187: 3184: 3181: 3178: 3170: 3166: 3162: 3158: 3154: 3150: 3149: 3148: 3147: 3143: 3139: 3136: 3132: 3128: 3121: 3120: 3115: 3114: 3109: 3107: 3106: 3102: 3098: 3094: 3087: 3085: 3084: 3080: 3076: 3072: 3068: 3064: 3057: 3049: 3045: 3041: 3037: 3036: 3035: 3032: 3030: 3025: 3023: 3017: 3016: 3015: 3014: 3011: 3007: 3003: 2999: 2998: 2995: 2992: 2989: 2984: 2977: 2971: 2967: 2963: 2959: 2958: 2957: 2953: 2949: 2944: 2942: 2938: 2934: 2929: 2928: 2927: 2923: 2919: 2915: 2914: 2913: 2912: 2908: 2904: 2899: 2895: 2891: 2887: 2879: 2877: 2876: 2873: 2864: 2859: 2855: 2850: 2846: 2845: 2844:Xerus inauris 2840: 2839: 2838:Xerus rutilus 2835: 2831: 2827: 2823: 2819: 2815: 2814: 2813: 2812: 2809: 2805: 2804:Miss Madeline 2801: 2797: 2793: 2789: 2785: 2781: 2773: 2771: 2770: 2766: 2762: 2758: 2754: 2746: 2742: 2738: 2734: 2733:208.87.217.46 2730: 2729: 2728: 2727: 2723: 2719: 2718:208.87.217.46 2715: 2707: 2701: 2697: 2693: 2689: 2685: 2684: 2683: 2682: 2679: 2675: 2671: 2667: 2666: 2665: 2664: 2660: 2656: 2651: 2649: 2641: 2640: 2639: 2636: 2630: 2629: 2625: 2622: 2621: 2620: 2618: 2611: 2607: 2594: 2590: 2586: 2581: 2579: 2575: 2571: 2566: 2565: 2563: 2559: 2555: 2554: 2553: 2549: 2545: 2540: 2539: 2538: 2534: 2530: 2526: 2523: 2522: 2521: 2517: 2513: 2509: 2508: 2502: 2499: 2498: 2497: 2495: 2491: 2487: 2483: 2479: 2475: 2467: 2465: 2464: 2460: 2456: 2452: 2448: 2444: 2440: 2435: 2431: 2427: 2423: 2415: 2411: 2407: 2403: 2399: 2395: 2394: 2393: 2392: 2389: 2385: 2384: 2379: 2375: 2367: 2366: 2361: 2354: 2350: 2346: 2342: 2338: 2337: 2332: 2327: 2326: 2323: 2319: 2315: 2311: 2307: 2303: 2299: 2298: 2295: 2291: 2287: 2283: 2282: 2277: 2272: 2271: 2270: 2269: 2265: 2261: 2254: 2250: 2239: 2237: 2236: 2233: 2228: 2226: 2220: 2216: 2212: 2204: 2202: 2201: 2196: 2191: 2187: 2180: 2176: 2172: 2168: 2164: 2163: 2162: 2160: 2156: 2152: 2151:124.169.92.45 2148: 2138: 2132: 2129: 2123: 2122: 2121: 2117: 2113: 2108: 2105:Looks like a 2104: 2103: 2102: 2101: 2098: 2092: 2088: 2084: 2080: 2072: 2068: 2064: 2060: 2056: 2055: 2054: 2053: 2049: 2045: 2041: 2033: 2031: 2030: 2026: 2022: 2018: 2014: 2010: 2006: 1998: 1996: 1995: 1991: 1987: 1979: 1975: 1973: 1972: 1968: 1964: 1955: 1949: 1945: 1941: 1937: 1933: 1932: 1931: 1930: 1927: 1922: 1917: 1908: 1905: 1904: 1903: 1902: 1897: 1892: 1882: 1880: 1876: 1872: 1867: 1861: 1859: 1858: 1854: 1850: 1846: 1843: 1837: 1833: 1829: 1825: 1824: 1819: 1818: 1813: 1812: 1807: 1806: 1801: 1798: 1795: 1794: 1793: 1792: 1788: 1784: 1780: 1776: 1768: 1766: 1765: 1761: 1757: 1751: 1747: 1740: 1732: 1728: 1724: 1720: 1716: 1712: 1708: 1704: 1700: 1696: 1691: 1690: 1689: 1685: 1681: 1677: 1673: 1669: 1664: 1663:author's page 1660: 1659: 1658: 1654: 1650: 1646: 1642: 1641: 1640: 1636: 1635: 1626: 1622: 1621: 1620: 1619: 1615: 1611: 1607: 1599: 1593: 1590: 1588: 1583: 1581: 1575: 1574: 1573: 1570: 1568: 1563: 1561: 1555: 1554: 1553: 1552: 1548: 1544: 1541: 1534: 1531: 1529: 1526: 1525: 1524: 1522: 1518: 1514: 1513: 1502: 1501: 1497: 1493: 1489: 1485: 1481: 1474: 1471: 1469: 1466: 1465: 1461: 1457: 1454: 1450: 1446: 1442: 1440: 1436: 1432: 1428: 1423: 1422: 1421: 1420: 1416: 1412: 1403: 1395: 1391: 1387: 1383: 1379: 1376: 1375: 1374: 1371: 1369: 1364: 1362: 1355: 1354: 1353: 1352: 1351: 1350: 1346: 1342: 1338: 1329: 1325: 1321: 1317: 1313: 1312: 1311: 1308: 1306: 1301: 1299: 1292: 1291: 1290: 1289: 1285: 1281: 1277: 1269: 1267: 1266: 1260: 1254: 1250: 1249: 1243: 1236: 1234: 1233: 1229: 1225: 1221: 1213: 1211: 1210: 1206: 1203: 1200: 1196: 1192: 1188: 1184: 1176: 1174: 1173: 1172: 1168: 1166: 1161: 1159: 1153: 1149: 1145: 1141: 1134:for FA Status 1133: 1129: 1127: 1126: 1122: 1118: 1114: 1110: 1106: 1102: 1094: 1088: 1084: 1080: 1076: 1072: 1068: 1066: 1062: 1056: 1052: 1049: 1045: 1044: 1038: 1036: 1035: 1032: 1023: 1020: 1012: 1008: 1004: 1000: 996: 992: 991: 990: 986: 982: 978: 974: 970: 969: 968: 964: 960: 956: 952: 948: 947:Fereuungulata 944: 940: 936: 932: 928: 924: 920: 919: 918: 917: 913: 909: 905: 901: 892: 886: 882: 878: 873: 872: 871: 867: 863: 858: 857: 856: 855: 850: 846: 841: 836: 832: 828: 821: 815: 814: 810: 806: 802: 798: 794: 790: 782: 780: 779: 776: 771: 767: 759: 757: 756: 752: 748: 744: 740: 736: 732: 728: 723: 717: 713: 711: 710: 706: 703: 700: 696: 691: 690: 686: 683: 680: 676: 672: 668: 660: 658: 657: 654: 650: 646: 642: 635: 630: 623: 621: 620: 616: 612: 604: 601: 599: 598: 594: 590: 586: 579: 575: 572: 570: 565: 563: 557: 556: 555: 554: 550: 547: 544: 540: 536: 533:I've created 528: 524: 521: 519: 514: 512: 506: 505: 504: 503: 499: 495: 494:Beach drifter 486: 482: 479: 477: 472: 470: 464: 455: 454: 453: 452: 448: 444: 440: 432: 424: 420: 416: 412: 408: 404: 400: 399: 398: 394: 390: 386: 382: 381: 380: 376: 372: 367: 366: 365: 364: 360: 356: 351: 347: 343: 339: 335: 330: 329: 326: 324: 319: 317: 311: 300: 296: 292: 288: 284: 280: 279: 278: 274: 270: 265: 260: 258: 255: 254: 249: 243: 240: 238: 233: 231: 225: 224: 223: 219: 215: 211: 207: 203: 202: 201: 200: 199: 196: 194: 189: 187: 180: 179: 178: 177: 173: 169: 165: 164: 157: 154: 152: 151: 147: 143: 139: 132: 128: 126: 125: 122: 120: 115: 113: 102: 96: 93: 90: 88: 85: 83: 80: 77: 73: 71: 68: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 4597: 4587: 4584: 4561: 4539: 4517: 4457: 4384: 4358: 4337: 4298: 4269:a discussion 4266: 4234: 4231: 4212: 4206: 4199: 4176: 4154: 4111: 4087: 4084: 4063: 4044: 4006: 4002: 3998: 3988: 3922: 3899: 3854: 3843: 3804: 3773: 3769: 3752: 3751: 3732: 3708: 3701: 3677: 3648:— Preceding 3625:Curly Turkey 3616: 3593: 3574: 3528: 3527: 3520: 3516: 3512: 3481: 3466: 3435: 3415: 3411: 3383: 3379: 3375: 3340: 3335: 3273:— Preceding 3259: 3217: 3210: 3200:this article 3197: 3174: 3152: 3130: 3126: 3124: 3117: 3111: 3097:65.94.76.126 3091: 3061: 3028: 3021: 2883: 2869: 2842: 2836: 2777: 2750: 2711: 2652: 2645: 2637: 2634: 2623: 2615: 2585:74.60.29.141 2570:74.60.29.141 2544:74.60.29.141 2512:74.60.29.141 2506: 2504: 2486:74.60.29.141 2481: 2478:sugar glider 2473: 2471: 2419: 2381: 2371: 2363: 2334: 2305: 2301: 2279: 2257:Best wishes, 2243: 2224: 2219:comment here 2208: 2194: 2184: 2145:— Preceding 2142: 2077:I just shot 2076: 2037: 2002: 1982: 1959: 1883: 1874: 1869:The article 1868: 1865: 1840: 1821: 1815: 1814:), gerbils ( 1809: 1803: 1772: 1769:"Desert rat" 1744: 1629: 1603: 1586: 1579: 1566: 1559: 1537: 1510: 1508: 1477: 1448: 1426: 1407: 1384:on Commons. 1367: 1360: 1334: 1318:on Commons. 1304: 1297: 1273: 1246: 1240: 1217: 1201: 1182: 1180: 1169: 1164: 1157: 1137: 1098: 1060: 1058: 1026: 981:84.203.34.52 908:84.203.34.52 902:, the other 896: 824: 819: 786: 763: 720: 701: 692: 681: 664: 647:rather than 645:Sunda colugo 638: 607: 583: 568: 561: 545: 532: 517: 510: 490: 475: 468: 462: 436: 384: 349: 345: 341: 333: 331: 322: 315: 307: 291:65.93.12.101 252: 236: 229: 214:65.93.12.101 209: 205: 192: 185: 168:65.93.12.101 166: 160: 135: 118: 111: 106: 75: 43: 37: 4566:. 4359:SMcCandlish 4338:Please see 4151:Of interest 4112:SMcCandlish 4049:, the UK’s 3735:updated FAQ 3521:Bassaricyon 3517:Bassaricyon 3513:Bassaricyon 3482:Bassaricyon 3457:Procyonidae 3412:B. beddardi 3361:Bassaricyon 3355:instead of 3347:Bassaricyon 3263:mgiganteus1 3234:mgiganteus1 3153:Canis rufus 3131:Canis rufus 2447:Talk:Ferret 2374:Mato Grosso 2005:Right whale 1999:Right whale 1884:Thank you. 1488:Ambulocetus 1480:Thrinaxodon 1378:Tiger quoll 1248:SMcCandlish 993:Please see 955:Pegasoferae 939:Ferungulata 805:Dana boomer 36:This is an 4391:this image 4282:Epipelagic 4183:Cwmhiraeth 4173:Rodent FAC 3784:Thank you, 3685:TeaDrinker 3157:Burmeister 2716:? Thanks! 2688:Barbatodon 2648:Barbatodon 2624:Barbatodon 2617:Barbatodon 2610:Barbatodon 2217:". Please 2079:this photo 1940:Stemonitis 1775:Desert rat 1756:Wavelength 1672:Petaurista 1492:Harizotoh9 1181:Debate on 1101:Island fox 1055:discussion 951:Euungulata 935:Scrotifera 921:From e.g. 840:ErikHaugen 783:FAR notice 611:CutOffTies 589:Epipelagic 403:task force 283:WP:COUNCIL 95:Archive 14 87:Archive 10 4599:ShaneGero 4547:Montanabw 4411:Montanabw 4352:Razorback 4348:Feral pig 4344:Wild boar 4318:RM notice 4267:There is 4241:talk page 4162:Montanabw 4137:Montanabw 4096:Montanabw 4003:See also: 3875:Mus (Mus) 3807:Protocone 3446:Carnivora 3436:B. medius 3420:Redirect 3388:Redirect 3380:B. lasius 3357:olinguito 3230:this edit 3071:The blurb 2933:Smokeybjb 2903:Le Deluge 2792:Carnivora 2747:Ungulates 2260:Felineora 1986:Bahudhara 1915:Hypercube 1890:Hypercube 1875:Muntiacus 1823:Zelotomys 1805:Dipodomys 1380:moved to 1314:Moved to 1224:Seduisant 624:Colugo ID 389:Pinguinus 355:Pinguinus 82:Archive 9 76:Archive 8 70:Archive 7 65:Archive 6 60:Archive 5 4585:Hi All, 4453:Rodentia 4385:I think 4305:Iceblock 4024:Eutheria 3995:Eutheria 3984:Eutheria 3815:Hypocone 3811:Metacone 3787:Madalibi 3739:Mr.Z-bot 3662:contribs 3650:unsigned 3577:UtherSRG 3558:UtherSRG 3529:Wine Guy 3501:UtherSRG 3468:UtherSRG 3438:and ssp) 3384:B. pauli 3318:UtherSRG 3287:contribs 3275:unsigned 3249:UtherSRG 3214:contribs 3138:Chrisrus 3065:will be 3040:FunkMonk 3002:FunkMonk 2962:FunkMonk 2918:FunkMonk 2784:sun bear 2761:4444hhhh 2755:article( 2753:ungulate 2302:Carollia 2281:Carollia 2249:Carollia 2244:Dear all 2213:" into " 2147:unsigned 2040:Steenbok 2021:Albacore 1817:Meriones 1259:Contribs 1205:contribs 1195:Casliber 1193:cheers, 1183:taxonomy 977:ungulate 943:Zooamata 849:contribs 827:this one 705:contribs 695:Casliber 685:contribs 675:Casliber 632:Mystery 585:Food web 580:Food web 549:contribs 539:Casliber 350:anything 253:innotata 3944:Anaxial 3915:Murinae 3905:Murinae 3860:Murinae 3745:) (for 3430:Create 3218:species 2948:Anaxial 2790:isn't? 2341:Anaxial 2167:Frickeg 2112:Anaxial 2059:Rlendog 1912:Inverse 1887:Inverse 1871:muntjac 1866:Hello, 1723:Shyamal 1649:Shyamal 1610:Shyamal 1543:Kaldari 1386:Snowman 1341:Snowman 1320:Snowman 1280:Snowman 1003:Limulus 862:Anaxial 747:Snowman 439:Tristis 415:Anaxial 371:Abyssal 269:Anaxial 206:did not 142:Philcha 129:RFC at 39:archive 4020:Mammal 3991:Mammal 3980:Mammal 3962:NSH002 3925:NSH002 3850:WP:NAV 3770:Hello, 3630:gobble 3580:(talk) 3561:(talk) 3504:(talk) 3486:Ucucha 3471:(talk) 3463:, etc. 3382:, and 3343:Olingo 3321:(talk) 3252:(talk) 3067:WP:TFA 3038:Done. 2800:rodent 2670:Aranae 2638:Then 2619:says: 2558:Ucucha 2529:Ucucha 2451:Ferret 2443:Ferret 2430:Ferret 2426:Ferret 2378:Nobres 2314:Ucucha 2165:Done. 2007:for a 1963:Halon8 1936:WT:TOL 1828:Ucucha 1699:Ucucha 1643:+ add 1625:Ucucha 1449:wapiti 1431:Ucucha 1404:Wapiti 1294:this. 1158:Beluga 1142:for a 1103:for a 959:Ucucha 791:for a 737:, and 735:Wisent 653:Ucucha 641:colugo 634:colugo 348:knows 346:nobody 342:nobody 340:, but 334:highly 287:WP:MFD 210:cannot 4248:Harej 4202:foxes 3727:OAuth 3600:ping! 3536:~Talk 3402:Move 3366:Move 3341:Move 3183:bills 2690:. -- 2107:takin 1849:SP-KP 1783:SP-KP 1779:Sumal 1453:MONGO 1255:ʕ(ل)ˀ 1253:Talk⇒ 931:Ferae 443:SP-KP 16:< 4603:talk 4572:talk 4521:Maky 4490:talk 4486:JKDw 4461:Maky 4431:talk 4427:JKDw 4399:talk 4395:JKDw 4381:Icon 4309:talk 4286:talk 4280:. -- 4252:talk 4219:talk 4187:talk 4072:talk 4032:talk 3993:and 3982:and 3966:talk 3948:talk 3929:talk 3831:talk 3791:talk 3743:talk 3689:talk 3658:talk 3596:S.G. 3490:talk 3414:and 3392:and 3308:talk 3283:talk 3238:talk 3228:and 3208:talk 3186:7701 3180:buff 3161:talk 3142:talk 3101:talk 3079:talk 3075:Jack 3044:talk 3006:talk 2966:talk 2952:talk 2937:talk 2922:talk 2907:talk 2892:and 2872:Leyo 2826:talk 2822:Jack 2788:bear 2765:talk 2737:talk 2722:talk 2696:talk 2674:talk 2659:talk 2589:talk 2574:talk 2562:talk 2548:talk 2533:talk 2516:talk 2490:talk 2459:talk 2424:and 2406:talk 2402:Jack 2388:Leyo 2345:talk 2318:talk 2290:talk 2286:Dger 2264:talk 2253:IUCN 2190:here 2171:talk 2155:talk 2116:talk 2063:talk 2048:talk 2025:talk 2017:here 1990:talk 1967:talk 1944:talk 1938:. -- 1921:talk 1896:talk 1853:talk 1832:talk 1787:talk 1760:talk 1727:talk 1703:talk 1695:ICZN 1684:talk 1680:Dger 1670:and 1653:talk 1633:Maky 1614:talk 1547:talk 1496:talk 1435:talk 1415:talk 1390:talk 1345:talk 1335:Re: 1324:talk 1284:talk 1274:Re: 1228:talk 1199:talk 1152:here 1121:talk 1117:Brad 1113:here 1083:talk 1075:talk 1007:talk 997:and 985:talk 975:and 963:talk 912:talk 904:here 900:here 881:talk 877:Dger 866:talk 845:talk 809:talk 801:here 774:talk 751:talk 699:talk 679:talk 615:talk 593:talk 543:talk 498:talk 463:Done 447:talk 419:talk 393:talk 375:talk 359:talk 295:talk 273:talk 218:talk 172:talk 146:talk 4373:ⱷ≼ 4369:≽ⱷ҅ 4354:). 4329:FYI 4159:. 4126:ⱷ≼ 4122:≽ⱷ҅ 4062:. 4005:or 3755:man 3748:Mr. 3723:now 3424:to 3406:to 3396:to 3370:to 3345:to 3304:CMD 3129:to 3116:to 3029:Pro 3022:Zoo 2987:min 2982:Kev 2841:or 2798:or 2796:bat 2312:). 2225:Axl 2198:• 2181:GAR 2081:at 2044:GRM 1826:). 1587:Pro 1580:Zoo 1567:Pro 1560:Zoo 1519:or 1451:... 1445:Elk 1368:Pro 1361:Zoo 1305:Pro 1298:Zoo 1165:boy 923:doi 829:to 569:Pro 562:Zoo 518:Pro 511:Zoo 476:Pro 469:Zoo 385:are 323:Pro 316:Zoo 237:Pro 230:Zoo 193:Pro 186:Zoo 119:Pro 112:Zoo 4605:) 4574:) 4518:– 4492:) 4458:– 4433:) 4401:) 4356:— 4332:– 4311:) 4288:) 4254:) 4221:) 4189:) 4109:— 4074:) 4034:) 3999:is 3968:) 3950:) 3931:) 3923:-- 3918:}} 3912:{{ 3908:}} 3902:{{ 3863:}} 3857:{{ 3833:) 3825:. 3813:, 3809:, 3793:) 3759:) 3753:Z- 3691:) 3664:) 3660:• 3552:, 3548:, 3492:) 3459:, 3455:, 3451:, 3449:}} 3443:{{ 3378:, 3310:) 3289:) 3285:• 3240:) 3224:, 3163:) 3144:) 3103:) 3081:) 3046:) 3008:) 2968:) 2954:) 2939:) 2924:) 2909:) 2896:. 2828:) 2806:| 2767:) 2739:) 2724:) 2698:) 2676:) 2661:) 2653:- 2591:) 2576:) 2564:) 2550:) 2535:) 2518:) 2492:) 2461:) 2408:) 2347:) 2320:) 2292:) 2266:) 2221:. 2192:. 2173:) 2157:) 2118:) 2065:) 2050:) 2027:) 2019:. 1992:) 1969:) 1946:) 1855:) 1834:) 1789:) 1762:) 1752:. 1729:) 1705:) 1686:) 1655:) 1630:– 1616:) 1549:) 1498:) 1447:a 1437:) 1417:) 1392:) 1347:) 1326:) 1286:) 1230:) 1207:) 1154:. 1123:) 1115:. 1085:) 1067:. 1009:) 987:) 965:) 914:) 883:) 868:) 847:| 811:) 803:. 753:) 745:. 733:, 729:, 707:) 687:) 617:) 595:) 551:) 500:) 449:) 421:) 395:) 377:) 361:) 312:. 297:) 275:) 220:) 204:I 174:) 148:) 140:-- 91:→ 4601:( 4570:( 4488:( 4429:( 4397:( 4371:ᴥ 4367:¢ 4364:☏ 4361:☺ 4307:( 4284:( 4250:( 4217:( 4185:( 4124:ᴥ 4120:¢ 4117:☏ 4114:☺ 4070:( 4030:( 3964:( 3946:( 3927:( 3829:( 3789:( 3741:( 3687:( 3656:( 3632:) 3628:( 3613:? 3524:– 3488:( 3434:( 3306:( 3281:( 3236:( 3211:· 3206:( 3159:( 3140:( 3099:( 3077:( 3042:( 3004:( 2991:§ 2964:( 2950:( 2935:( 2920:( 2905:( 2824:( 2763:( 2735:( 2720:( 2694:( 2672:( 2657:( 2612:? 2587:( 2572:( 2560:( 2546:( 2531:( 2514:( 2488:( 2476:( 2457:( 2404:( 2368:? 2343:( 2316:( 2288:( 2262:( 2230:¤ 2169:( 2153:( 2114:( 2061:( 2046:( 2023:( 1988:( 1965:( 1942:( 1923:) 1919:( 1898:) 1894:( 1851:( 1830:( 1785:( 1758:( 1754:— 1725:( 1701:( 1682:( 1651:( 1612:( 1545:( 1515:( 1494:( 1433:( 1413:( 1388:( 1343:( 1322:( 1282:( 1261:. 1226:( 1202:· 1197:( 1119:( 1081:( 1005:( 983:( 961:( 925:: 910:( 879:( 864:( 851:) 843:( 807:( 749:( 702:· 697:( 682:· 677:( 613:( 591:( 546:· 541:( 496:( 445:( 417:( 391:( 373:( 357:( 293:( 271:( 216:( 170:( 144:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge

talk:WikiProject Mammals/Archive 8 - Knowledge

Index