158:
140:
109:
418:
I would set most of the big chain parks in the High category, with most of
Screamscape's "Small Parks" (at least the American/European ones) in the Mid. Most water parks could probably be Mid as well, but those and parks outside the US and Europe should be covered more to balance out systemic bias.
402:
The four levels are based on that
Knowledge (XXG) 1.0 thing and is set up in the assessment bot. But we could just put the Amusement park article in TOP and then everything else in high, med, low. Because the decision of whether something is notable is still very subjective, I think that we can't be
374:
we use the importance scale. Personally, I don't think it should be followed overly strictly, but more as a guide to get our priorities sorted. I don't know whether it's possible, but it would be much easier to have just 3 levels of importance - high, mid and low - you can generally get a feel for
531:. I feel that the new table retains some of the original information but makes it easier for a non-project member, who may already be familiar with other project importance scales, to understand the grade assigned to an article without checking the chart.
49:
524:
403:
too strict about this. I invited some of the other members to the project to comment if they care too. If we don't hear in a couple of days, we might start making assessments based on these criteria.--
523:
There hasn't been any activity here in a long time, but for anyone who is interested, I've completely reconstructed the importance scale. I brought it up to
Knowledge (XXG)'s standards as outlined at
34:
466:
Yep, seems good to me. They echo the roller coaster importance quite nicely too, which helps having uniformity across the topic. As for the low importance articles -
567:
562:
535:, it was also less clear where certain topics would fall under the listed criteria if it wasn't specifically mentioned. You can view the changes I made here –
174:
84:
17:
445:
I edited the list above, bold showing new. So low would be?? Can you come up with an example? Think i marked something low yesterday, I should go look. --
165:
145:
90:
30:
333:
Not record breakers or highly notable (this will include most of
Screamscape's "Small Parks" (at least the American/European ones)
572:
79:
120:
70:
471:
548:
513:
496:
458:
449:
432:
407:
393:
364:
157:
139:
528:
212:
We need to decide on an importance scale. Borrowing from the one for roller coasters, we could do something like:
428:
306:
126:
487:
384:
267:
60:
173:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
75:
475:
467:
424:
544:
479:
376:
280:
56:
510:
455:
446:
404:
361:
257:
253:
220:
419:
Other than that the scale looks ok. Roller coaster designers and park chain CEOs (e.g.
170:
556:
540:
343:
parks outside the US and Europe should be covered more to balance out systemic bias
227:
420:
231:
478:... they're fairly irrelevant to the topic but merit being in the WP.
454:
Also, what about all manufacturers. Should it just be major mfers? --
102:
25:
525:
Knowledge (XXG):Version 1.0 Editorial Team
Release Criteria
536:
532:
329:
Mid: Most parks and rides will fall in this category:
509:
I moved the above criteria to the assessment page. --
423:) should have attention to their articles as well. --
266:
Any prolific persons associated with the topic (eg.
169:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
370:I like it! I think we need to decide right away
18:Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Amusement Parks
119:does not require a rating on Knowledge (XXG)'s
300:particularly notable rides, either because of
276:particularly notable parks, either because of
8:
183:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Amusement Parks
219:amusement parks (e.g., main articles like
216:Top: General and main articles related to
134:
307:Mauch Chunk Switchback Gravity Railroad
136:
314:ride set some record or milestone, or
256:) and ride categories in general like
35:WikiProject Amusement Parks/Assessment
568:NA-importance amusement park articles
563:Project-Class amusement park articles
286:park set some record or milestone, or
7:
186:Template:WikiProject Amusement Parks
108:
106:
243:any subparts of those main articles
125:It is of interest to the following
33:for discussing improvements to the
24:
351:Low: Any loosely related articles
263:All manufacturers (eg. Vekoma) ??
163:This page is within the scope of
55:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome!
226:types of amusement parks (e.g.,
156:
138:
107:
50:Click here to start a new topic.
360:Any thoughts or suggestions? --
514:19:13, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
240:essential mechanical articles,
1:
497:17:44, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
459:22:34, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
450:22:32, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
305:historical significance (eg.
279:historical significance (eg.
177:and see a list of open tasks.
47:Put new text under old text.
549:06:54, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
472:American Coaster Enthusiasts
375:what would fall into those.
433:23:29, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
408:20:55, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
394:18:45, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
365:18:34, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
272:designers, planners, owners
166:WikiProject Amusement Parks
589:
519:Update to importance scale
151:
133:
85:Be welcoming to newcomers
505:Moved to assessment page
252:Rides in general (i.e.,
573:Amusement park articles
189:amusement park articles
268:LaMarcus Adna Thompson
80:avoid personal attacks
529:{{Importance scheme}}
533:Prior to the changes
476:No Limits (software)
468:RollerCoaster Tycoon
319:popularity of ride
289:popularity of park
121:content assessment
91:dispute resolution
52:
338:Most water parks
281:Steeplechase Park
205:
204:
201:
200:
197:
196:
101:
100:
71:Assume good faith
48:
580:
485:
482:
382:
379:
191:
190:
187:
184:
181:
160:
153:
152:
142:
135:
112:
111:
110:
103:
26:
588:
587:
583:
582:
581:
579:
578:
577:
553:
552:
521:
507:
494:
483:
480:
443:
391:
380:
377:
358:
293:big chain parks
258:roller coasters
254:Amusement rides
221:Amusement parks
210:
188:
185:
182:
180:Amusement Parks
179:
178:
171:Amusement parks
146:Amusement Parks
97:
96:
66:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
586:
584:
576:
575:
570:
565:
555:
554:
520:
517:
506:
503:
502:
501:
500:
499:
488:
442:
439:
438:
437:
436:
435:
425:Idont Havaname
413:
412:
411:
410:
397:
396:
385:
357:
354:
353:
352:
348:
347:
346:
345:
340:
335:
326:
325:
324:
323:
322:
321:
316:
311:
297:
296:
295:
290:
287:
284:
274:
264:
261:
246:
245:
244:
241:
238:
235:
224:
209:
206:
203:
202:
199:
198:
195:
194:
192:
175:the discussion
161:
149:
148:
143:
131:
130:
124:
113:
99:
98:
95:
94:
87:
82:
73:
67:
65:
64:
53:
44:
43:
40:
39:
38:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
585:
574:
571:
569:
566:
564:
561:
560:
558:
551:
550:
546:
542:
538:
534:
530:
526:
518:
516:
515:
512:
504:
498:
495:
493:
492:
486:
477:
473:
469:
465:
464:
463:
462:
461:
460:
457:
452:
451:
448:
440:
434:
430:
426:
422:
417:
416:
415:
414:
409:
406:
401:
400:
399:
398:
395:
392:
390:
389:
383:
373:
369:
368:
367:
366:
363:
355:
350:
349:
344:
341:
339:
336:
334:
331:
330:
328:
327:
320:
317:
315:
312:
310:
308:
303:
302:
301:
298:
294:
291:
288:
285:
282:
278:
277:
275:
273:
269:
265:
262:
260:
259:
255:
250:
249:
247:
242:
239:
236:
233:
229:
225:
222:
218:
217:
215:
214:
213:
207:
193:
176:
172:
168:
167:
162:
159:
155:
154:
150:
147:
144:
141:
137:
132:
128:
122:
118:
114:
105:
104:
92:
88:
86:
83:
81:
77:
74:
72:
69:
68:
62:
58:
57:Learn to edit
54:
51:
46:
45:
42:
41:
36:
32:
28:
27:
19:
522:
508:
490:
489:
453:
444:
441:Second round
387:
386:
371:
359:
342:
337:
332:
318:
313:
304:
299:
292:
271:
251:
228:trolley park
211:
164:
127:WikiProjects
117:project page
116:
29:This is the
421:Dick Kinzel
356:First Round
232:theme parks
557:Categories
511:Tinned Elk
456:Tinned Elk
447:Tinned Elk
405:Tinned Elk
362:Tinned Elk
208:Importance
93:if needed
76:Be polite
31:talk page
541:GoneIn60
61:get help
527:and at
484:serpent
381:serpent
237:history
248:High:
123:scale.
115:This
89:Seek
37:page.
16:<
545:talk
539:. --
537:diff
491:Talk
429:Talk
388:Talk
78:and
481:Sea
378:Sea
372:how
309:),
270:),
559::
547:)
474:,
470:,
431:)
283:),
230:,
223:),
59:;
543:(
427:(
234:)
129::
63:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
