Knowledge talk:WikiProject LGBT studies/Archive 24

222:

certainly don't all agree. But at least we try to accept the various and unique flaws in ourselves and others as something that makes us unique and perhaps even special in our own ways. I can't remember what it was called, something like Project 1.7 but it was the CDRom put out last fall to have a standalone offline compendium of wikipedia, essentially several thousand core articles. And I realized that we really should aim to identify several hundred of ours as core LGBTI subjects and put them in a LGBT core article category and have a bot add an importance=high rank on those talkpages. Because that's the flag to the rest of the wiki world. Then we start paying more attention to those and direct new recruits in that general direction. It would be lovely to start that process now with a goal of getting all the clean-up tags cleared and all major deficiencies addressed by mid-October.

781:

submitting articles straight to WP:FAC because they got a more thorough lookthrough. All the stuff we had was maintained by me, but virtually no-one used it. Whether you have co-ordinators or not you need a critical mass of users to actually use the infrastructures you build otherwise it's irrelevant. And if you have a critical mass of users to maintain it, then you don't need co-ordinators. Co-ordinators are there as an appointed person to make sure that the maintenence gets done, not to act as any kind of visionary or whatever. But if you don't have a system that's being used regularly to even need maintenence, suddenly it's just a nice title to carry around. We need people to *use* what we've got, or to work out what tools people want to edit and provide it, otherwise we're editing to look busy, which doesn't help our core aims.

2144:

gender. The issues we face individually affect us all as a group as well. When we have legislation that allows two adults to marry regardless of their gender then it matters less that someone come out of the closet as intersex, bisexual or gay, or anything else; only that they - in theory - love each other and want to marry. Similar with hate crimes legislation, adoption and hospitalization rights, etc. Someone who is crossdressing but identifies as heterosexual or a person who is bisexual but in a heteronormative relationship perhaps will have less challenges of things but they remain a part of the LGBT communities and like all members face discrimination and have been a part of the various movements to attain equal rights for all. Similarly this project has room for anyone, including allies, who want to help.

3721:

information and factual resources without being propagandized by my love of sex-positive literature or by some editors' loathing of sex-positive attitudes. As one absorbs more information, as one opens up to the possibility of being presented with thoughtfully evolved articles, it almost automatically causes a little growth of appreciation of Liberty. If we value the sharing of information collaboratively, cooperatively, neutrally... then we value a fundamental freedom. I bet i share that value (of freedom) with most editors, even if they are totally religiously opposed to my sex-positive viewpoints. It is in that spirit of freedom i hope to find common ground for the sake of making these LGBT articles a more educational and reliable source of (free) information. Happy April, and many more. ~

2903:. A note is coming up that says it is a candidate for the LGBT Wiki project, and I'm just trying to find out what I need to do to have it linked or listed as a resource etc. Specifically, the film covers the same sex marriage debate in 2004 at the height of the heated debates and protests in Massachusetts. It is being used as an educational tool in schools and churches throughout the U.S.. I am definitely new to tricky Wiki so, please feel free to link to this entry or list it wherever appropriate. I have tried multiple times to list it as a Documentary resource in the Documentary and Literature section of the Same Sex Marriage wiki entry but someone keeps removing it and I cannot figure out why, as it is a legitimate resource absolutely and directly related to that topic. 2181:

wearing dresses and that has nothing to do with Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual or Transgender sexual orientations or struggles. I welcome any and all people to participate in this project, regardless of sexual orientation or clothing choice. But that has nothing to do with articles within the project's scope. Based on the argument that "if X has had to fight for inclusion and equality, then X is welcomed with open arms", then we might as well start tagging animal rights pages, all mormon pages (polygamists want their rights too!) and anything and everything having to do with African-American civil rights. There just has to be a line drawn somewhere. It's time we got back to the basics.

785:

quite work like that. :P Military history is clearly defined and many people specialise in specific periods, like WW1, Tanks, whatever. LGBT is made up of several disparate groups of L,G, B, and T, and many of the editors working in those four areas aren't interested in, or don't judge themselves capable of, providing support to editors in other areas. We also have the massive disadvantage that we cover all LGBT people, very few of whom have anything in common with each other than who they sleep with, which makes it more difficult for editors working on those articles to see themselves as working together towards a common aim of good LGBT coverage.

524:(de-indent) Re: Above comments about jobs/posts -- While well-intentioned ideas, a more anarchist (in keeping w/ wiki ideals, heh) approach to think about might be adopting a workgroup system for certain topic areas. (i.e. Transgender workgroup, LGBT literature workgroup) The Africa WikiProject uses this approach for countries which do not have their own WikiProject -- Article talk pages are tagged as part of the Africa WikiProject, but the workgroup they are a part of is listed also, within the template. The fact that we all have individual interests and our participation waxes and wanes due to our own personal schedules and wikibonked-ness ( 528:) is only natural, & isn't anything that will be going away. In fact, the fact that we are a diverse group with diverse interests, & require no central leader (like a regular IRL organization), is a strength--not a weakness. (and 1 more blab, before i step off the soap box) .. Banjeboi mentioned above about identifying core topics.. someone brought up using importance levels (on this page) a few weeks ago, but I don't think it went anywhere. The Wolterbot cleanup listing (listed in our open tasks box) actually marks higher-importance articles within the cleanup list ( 3205: 3196: 3187: 3178: 3169: 3062:

multiple implications and meanings for many people. But as long as that Homosexuality article remains incoherent, poorly sourced, and an insult to the English language, it will remain a playground for the folks who cherry pick sources and have an axe to grind. I don't doubt that Ejnogarb will be given a topic ban in good time if he keeps it up, and he will bring it on himself and blame the left-leaning gay-friendly values of Knowledge instead of looking inward to ask himself why he is here. Unless, of course, that is the reason he is here. --

3160: 644:

dept, etc), etc.) Even the best of people can let positions get to their head sometimes, and this would be one way to help guard against that (by each co- having their own defined area). Also, how exactly would having a "whip" help things? I could go on a tagging-spree (i'm not) and within 2 weeks, WolterBot would be proclaiming my edicts to my fellow man, as tasks to be done... (making me the "whip"). Not sure unpaid workers will exactly line up to be whipped around ( insert visual puns in your own mind here :-D )

2848: 150:

working on our own things than this rewrite I did of Lesbian. I asked on the talk page of the article, here at WP:LGBT, on a lesbian chat board I was a member of, I asked a university women's studies professor, and various people what I should read, where I should look, and on what topics I should concentrate on. Most of them said something like "Dude, I have no idea, but good luck with that." The least encouraging comment I got was from WP:LGBT.

31: 3680:

India 909? I guess it's tough to make sense of those kinds of overgeneralizations, but if you were more specific i might be able to see your point? BTW, thanks for indicating promiscuity is probably a good thing; if you could be more specific, again, i might hypothetically find some way to agree with you. Otherwise i fail to see your meaning. (Admittedly i am dense at some online expressions.) ~

2122:

his membership dues returned. Cross dressing isn't a sexual orientation nor is it anything like transgender - unless I'm missing something.. did he really want to be a woman, as in genitalia and all? Then yes, he'd be transgender and should be included. I mean, my god, the man was straight.. but because he liked to wear a dress, he's automatically "one of ours"? I just don't agree with that.

547:

want to work on. If it doesnt work, why keep trying the same things? If we want them, someone has to be responsible for occasionally doing maintaince on the list. Also, i don't think we have enough people for "work-groups" which would put us where we are now, with our "departments". (Agree that importance field in the banner would be better method, although i don't mind if we use it or not).

777:

whoever above suggested we establish co-ordinators to do. However, because my time on Knowledge dropped like a stone when I left Chelmsford, I stopped being the great co-ordinator that I was (no arrogance there, no, not at all :P) and at that point all the infrastructure I built, like CotM, Jumpaclass, Newsletters etc. just sort of got abandoned (I am delighted the newsletter is back).

1923:

to his wiki article, then when the article was protected, added enough information to the talk page to ensure that the Australian media would be able to confirm his passing by contacting the hospital. Unfortunately, this callous act caused the family great distress and forced them to release the official announcement that was intended to be withheld until after a private funeral. --

362:

go the way of more organisation and giving people responsibilities :-O. I know Moni has done the newsletter in the past, and Outsider works on the portal, and i try to review all the requests for assessment - but these were all jobs taken up independantly, yes? Making a list of job areas and people who can be considered the first contacts on areas would help, imo. MilHist even has

165:

becoming a cohesive entity that works for the same goal, or if we're happy doing this, just working on our individual projects, and coming here to make random announcements. I don't know what needs to be done to gather folks together and have them move as one. I admit my own disconnect: it should be done if we're going to be more productive, but I don't know how to do it.

1250:

rights that are often bundled into gay marriage bills. Making it easier for readers to find this information is the highest priority, imo, and having it all on one page is the best way at the moment (as long as redirects are in place). Spinning of sub-articles for the instances it is really necessary per WP:size and WP:undue should be a later consideration.

1655:

laws regarding jobs, school, etc, may be contingent on state laws. Then there could be a section about 'gay life' for each state - a history timeline of political and academic activities, 'gay heritage' (gay writers from the given state, etc). It's a big project, but ultimately it would make sense I think...or should we stick to the legislation?

789:

encouraging interest in all aspects of the project, rather than leadership. Get more people in, and others will naturally take control (which, you may have noticed, is exactly what has happened in terms of the main contributors to this wikiproject - it used to be me, SatyrTN and Jeff, and now the torch has passed on to other worthy souls. :D).

2543: 413:

MfDs need member input, they rustle folks over to the discussion. They keep a list of articles that need structural help, extra citations, wikifying, etc. If articles need peer review, or there is an FAC up with LGBT issues, I hope they would also point people in the right direction, giving some tips on peer review. Just some ideas. --

2686:, with the third under construction (it may not be long enough for DYK). It has been mentioned that this WP might not approve of any of the suggested hooks. If any members of this WP wish to suggest alternate hooks we would be happy for them to do so. Alternatively, support from this WP for any of the suggested hooks would be welcome. 551:

responsibility - with 5 or 7 people keeping tabs on article alerts and request for input/imporvment we can keep up to date with the many areas these info need to be distributed, and point editors to articles that need them. Specific jobs are: newsletter, portal, assesments, peer review, collaboration of the month, core topics? others?

3537:

Modern western homosexual culture has been linked with higher levels of promiscuity. A 1978 study revealed that 75% of self-identified, white, gay men admitted to having sex with more than 100 different males in their lifetime: 15% claimed 100-249 sex partners; 17% claimed 250-499; 15 percent claimed

3411:

rank seems reasonably high. There are numerous publications that cover them that simply need to be dug up and out from the XXX material. My hunch would be to encourage them to build a corp article in userspace with a section for each notable-ish property (like Badpuppy.com). If any subsection expands

2223:

Allstarecho, my apologies, I didn't mean to put words or ideas into your mouth or even suggest you were being unwelcoming. I'm sorry. I too am concerned that we stick to the basics and at the end of the day I think we are. In this particular case the subject actually lived as a woman but even if they

1922:

As a heterosexual cross-dresser and a long term member of this wikiproject, I'm disappointed to read your comments, Allstar. Oh, and is seems that my above comment was in error and I owe an apology to his ex-wife. It was the girlfriend that he never married who was adding the information on his death

958:

the four sub-area coordinators - with a footnote saying these were added in March 2009 - but would not like seeing Dev920 or Satyrn removed unless we had a more formal process which I'm not sure is needed. Personally I'm still in shock and I'm not sure when I won't be. We do keep plugging away and do

863:

In all honesty, I don't think people care, Yobmod. That's why I'm still Co-ordinator despite semi-retiring in 2007. I think people just step up to the plate really. Moni3 has no official title or gew-gaws and is still running half the project by herself. Enthusiastic active editors are everywhere, we

665:

implied. I suggested specific job areas (in addition to general responsibilities), because i think people are more likely to regularly contribute to neglected areas if it is written down somewhere. I know i am much more likely to comment at peer reviews since saying i would! This also makes it easier

643:

Didn't see a better place to put this, so sorry if it is mis-placed.... if the new coordinators (or co-coordinators) idea moves forward, will they be limited to coordinating certain areas? (i.e. 1 coordinator for the Newsletter, 1 coordinator for community activities (welcoming new members, community

591:

Agreed that about whipping and watching going together :-D, i was thinking they would be something we all agree to do regularly. Outsider and I have been working on the open tasks tempate, to make thealert more visible and easier to access. Does anyone know enough to run a bot? I notified the current

546:

Isn't the anarchist method the one we have now, which isn't working? I'm only interested in what works, not making bureaucracy - eg, we have a list of core topics, which it almost entirely ignored, indicating that the group-think idea of core topics really doesn't match with what project contributors

361:

I commented (minorly) on the Lesbian GA, talk page and peer review, but very few people seemed to have followed the collaboration of the month link - most were responding to the GA or had worked with Moni before. If we want the project to be more effective, like MilHist, then i think we would need to

312:

I think part of the issue is just the natural wzx and wane cycle of any group. However, I think you are correct, Moni, that we function more as a collective of individuals than a cohesive whole. Someone (I forget who) posted about choosing a CotM for March, because a new one had never been chosen for

255:

I also miss Jeff, and he was quite the rabble-rouser. But we can't depend on one person to define us. As much as I love Jeff, this reminds me of the ambiguity I had to address in Harvey Milk's legacy, where the Castro just sat around feeling sorry for itself after Milk died, and got walloped again by

225:

I'll also state I'm still not over Jeffpw being gone and I don't know when I might be so I just do what I can. Personally I'm also not great at long articles. My cheap-ass computer and various short attention span issues simply don't mesh well so I focus on stubs and mid-size material. I'd be willing

156:

I am one lesbo who has a specific set of experiences to color what it means to be called a lesbian, to claim the identity, and participate in the behavior. Although I read all the bidnezz associated with the article, I still decided what to include, what was important, and what was not. The structure

3552:

I removed the content dealing with the 1978 study (a 31 year old study is hardly relevant to today) as well as the content about the diseases and blood bans because they are irrelevant to the topic of the article. This left only the content about the 2007 study showing similar numbers of promiscuity

3061:

That Homosexuality article is a frightening disaster of a mess. Yes, that "health and promiscuity" section is clearly POV the way it is designed. I think there is value in discussing the issues of promiscuity in the gay community within the proper context, namely as an expression of freedom that has

1733:

Maybe synthesis, but not a deletion candidate, imo. The concept of Gay Rodeos seems notable enough in itself, just whether it has any links to homosexuality in the real old West that is dubious. Even if not, i'm sure some people probable claim it does, so the link should be attributed to someone. (I

1669:

We are basically in agreement. These would be the main LGBT rights articles for each state with room to grow, of course, and any articles will be either merged, if rather small or summarized with a link to them from the main. I'm still drafting the template but part of the goal is to create them all

1654:

I mean I think articles about marriages are interesting, but there should be a page on 'gay rights' in each state as well. As a European, I'm not even sure who I'd be allowed to kiss - do they have to be over 21, or simply over 18? Does that depend on the state legislation? Also, anti-discrimination

894:

I disagree about enthusiastic editors, certainly there are not enough that are interested in the project and the articles under it'S perview rather than happening to be LGBT. Has anyone done any assesment in the unassessed LGBT articles list since this discusion began (apart from me)? Which is why i

485:

duties and take a crack at the newsletter. It's my great regret that I never crossed paths with Jeffpw; he's a hell of an act to follow (not to say that the edition in your sandbox sets a formidable standard, Moni!), so as a relative noob all I have to offer is blissful freedom from burnout, and the

160:

It's not my intention to guilt members into giving a peer review. I figure if they wanted to do it, it would already have been done. God knows I can't be dragged to do the things I don't feel like doing. Two days after the rewrite was posted, comments were up at Talk:Gay about how that article needs

3679:

That sort of overgeneralization is fraught with all sorts of potential error. Which LGBT culture? The Americans', the Latin Americans', the Australians', the Uzbekis'? What way do you mean "ingrained"? What is "straight culture"? Which "straight culture", the one in North America 2009 or the one in

3542:

reported in 2001, that "experts believe syphilis is on the rise among gay and bisexual men because they are engaging in unprotected sex with multiple partners, many of whom they met in anonymous situations such as sex clubs, adult bookstores, meetings through the Internet and in bathhouses. The new

2854:

Hey guys - the Israeli government arranged with some of the big nightclubs to give me some excellent access to photograph Tel Aviv gay nightlife - I really bar hopped! Thankfully I had some good guides. I leave back to New York tonight and the hotel Internet is super slow. This one photo example

2310:

I just added our project tag to this article because I just learned that they wrote the charter amendment to overturn the sexual orientation protection passed by the Gainesville, Florida city council, which incidentally, was voted down last night, so yay. However, I have a feeling this one is going

2121:

Alice, I apologize for disappointing you or hurting your feelings. But you must realize that not all gay people agree with the notion that every letter of the alphabet somehow belongs in the gay community. The fact that he was heterosexual, to me anyway, totally makes his gay card null and void and

1762:

The entire leather subculture comes from cowboys via biker gangs. Can't wait til that starts to hit the fan. And yes, despite my personal disdain for anything that fosters animal abuse of any kind, gay rodeos are certainly notable and the major event rivaled only by pride events. And yes, mountains

1249:

Banjeboi's idea of having LGBT rights in xxxx sound like an improvment to me, with the marriage/domestic partnerships etc redirecting to them. Anyone wanting to read about Gay marriage in California will certinaly want to know about the state of domestic partnerships and probably adoption and other

915:

I just saw Dev920's response, and I laughed out loud to see that I'm running anything. If I'm giving that impression, then bully for me. I wonder if I'm also giving the impression that I'm competent and have some kind of master plan. If that's the case, then yes, I totally have an oversized cranium

686:

We could always go the opposite way to milhist, and instead of requiring that coordinators be elected (which yeah, I can see how that could lead to some ownership issues) lay it open so that anyone who volunteers can become a co-coordinator, making the coordination more collaborative. It's not like

3701:

Modern LGBT culture has an element of promiscuity to it. As far as I know, it's fairly widespread geographically. Straight culture was a shorthand for non-LGBT circles. Essentially, there are a high number of LGBT people who have less sexual inhibitions than non-LGBT people. By promiscuity being a

3499:

That doesn't answer your question, though. The template on the talk page should go wherever our members think we should be watching to make sure the article is as accurate as possible. This includes folks who have been rumored to be gay. We have as much at stake in ensuring that history accurately

3014:

My purpose is to make these article NPOV, most of which have so far showed an obvious bias in favor of LGBT groups. If I do get content-blocked, it will only prove that Knowledge has become dominated by editors who won't allow neutrality. Most of my edits are removing content from obviously biased

2143:

I hear what you're stating and I know others share similar views but the T in GLBT is pretty broad and inclusive. When one is being victimized, beaten or even murdered, it matters only so much if your attackers are doing so because your are in fact gay or simply dressing non-traditionally for your

1161:

for all US states and redirect shorter articles regarding marriage, adoption, etc there unless/until they are large enough to split on their own. If they are large enough a summary is fine. As part of this redirects would also be created to help keep content centralized for future editors' efforts

784:

Regarding why milhist gets tons of feedback and articles like Lesbian don't, I suspect is comes down to remit and style. Military history tend sto attract those kind of editors that do take a regimented, planned, structured approach to articles. We're, by contrast, are a bunch of gays - it doesn't

164:

I find group interactions and social patterns fascinating. I watch a lot more of what goes on at Knowledge than I participate, and I realize that this group is no different than any other volunteer organization. But I guess we need to make a decision as a group if we're going to be working towards

3547:

renewed its blood-donor eligibility limitations which restricts men who have had sexual contact with men in the last 5 years from donating tissue and since 1977 from donating blood because such groups have a higher risk factor for HIV and Hepatitis B. However, a 2007 study reported that two large

1707:

Appears to be a new article, but my eyebrows are lifted right off the top of my face when reading it. I think it needs some help. The connections to gay cowboys of the Old West are dubious and appear to be WP:SYNTH unless he has a source (and I wanna read it if he does) to say that one begets the

708:

Genghis Khan of LGBT? I am intrigued. It is my experience that unless someone steps up and does something, like the dishes in a dormitory, nothing will get done. Members seem to have no compunction with telling others to stop what they're doing because they're messing things up. I'm ok with that.

412:

The other position, a talk page whipper, is someone who shoves members in the direction of articles and talk pages that need assistance, welcomes new members to the project, and is a queer Wal-Mart greeter, basically. If this has not been clarified before, I've seen SatyrTN and Dev920 do this. If

149:

I appreciate the reminder, which is now the third placed in WP:LGBT about a peer review for the overhaul of a core article. I'm going to risk opening a can of worms here with the hope that it will move us in a different direction. I guess nothing has illustrated that we are a group of individuals

2180:

Benji, I most certainly was not saying the project was closed to everyone, including allies, and implying that I said such irks me. I was saying that the article in question shouldn't be included in the project because the subject of the article is (was before his death) a straight man who likes

1964:

Fortunately, because his 2nd wife, Lesley Brydon, was "former Executive Director of the Advertising Federation of Australia" and a journalist, when a newspaper got hold of the story they rang her and told her that they were going to publish it. She gave them the official release that was already

1352:

I have a cunning plan to create all the articles but they should be fluffed one by one with specific state info as well. I'd like to hold off another day or two to see if there is any major objections or plot flaws. Once I get the template sorted a bit would you be interested in this or at least

788:

So, I would say that trying to compare ourselves to other projects that are fundamentally different can be a useful spur, but it's not something to beat ourselves up about. And that our major problem right now, which has been our major problem for years but seems to be getting slightly worse, is

669:

Having one person for defined areas would be more likely to "go to people heads" imo - "I am the coordinator of assessments, therefore my assessment trumps other users" is less likely if co-coordinators don't feeling they are stepping on others toes by joining in, even if it is not the area they

384:

If there're responsibilities to be had, I'll raise my hand. I'm pretty new to the project, and had been assuming this was all coordinated somewhere. If it's ad hoc, though, I'd be thrilled to throw my hat into the ring for whatever duties are going. I like writing content and wikifying, and have

1872:

Ahh Alice, since you've brought this article to my attention.. why is it even tagged LGBT Project? He was a straight cross-dresser. I'm assuming it was because he cross dresses but is that really within our scope? It's certainly not a gay only thing and it says in the article he's heterosexual.

1376:

I can do basic things (formatting etc), but i'm not American, so know very little about the states (or how the legal system works there). In the UK and Germanywe just have countrywide civil unions, much less confusing! On a related issue, i have been merging the "Year in LGBT rights" stubs into

780:

And that, I think is the problem. Because while I was setting Collaborations every month, actual changes made to the pages after a month was minimal and mainly restricted to cosmetic editing. I constantly struggled to get anyone to peer review stuff, not just here but even at WP:PR - I ended up

776:

a Co-ordinator of this WikiProject, and that Co-ordinator is me (by default now, really, we were going to hold re-elections and then decided it was hassle). I got elected years back in recognition of service to WP:LGBT, and technically I am supposed to be keeping everything ticking over just as

366:

for coordinators, which i think is too much for here, but a semi official list of responsibilities would be useful (as long as responsibilites move when editors become unactive). I see we already have a list of jobs, but the coordinaotrs are either inactive altogether, or not very active in the

221:

It's one big experiment as far as I can tell. Really this is part of queer organizing 101 - the very things that drive you nuts is likely what makes the LGBT community rather invincible in its own dysfunctional way. That is, we don't all think and act as one, even if we should at times, and we

251:

Yes, this is true. Almost every gay organization sets precedents, including this one. I once compared our group to MilHist, saying if those folks have some kind of quasi-military focus on article improvement, our little group is more like a thumping disco. But we also have a huge set of unique

3720:

Oh, i see better now about what you meant. I share sex-positive views also, and i eschew negativity toward other peoples' sex views. I think the best articles about sexology are the ones which are totally neutral, allowing readers across the sex positive/negative spectrum (spectra?) to absorb

550:

But i do agree about not having a leader, so would sugest a larger number of coordinators. They have shared reponsibility for general things, and some of the more discreet jobs can be specifically assigned to one or two (or three) of them. The "talk page whipper" would be the major general

486:

great literary tradition of British queers upon which to draw :). And I promise not to put smilies in any newsletter edition you let me write. Perhaps best of all would be a group of people wanting to work on this: Moni, would you be interested in doing any more, with a collaborator?

277:

It is because we all have different interests, and because there are very many different things to do. I took a look at your article on lesbians, by the way, and you had done such a thorough job that there was not that much more I could add. Except perhaps, "Congratulations!"

2209:. Transgender refers to people who significantly "deviate" from traditionally prescribed gender, not people who want to live out a particular gender full time. In fact, according to the APA: "Cross-dressers or transvestites comprise the most numerous transgender group." 157:

of the article is my idea. Should I be the only one making these decisions? Good gracious: 5,000 people a day read this article: more than Gay and Homosexuality. This article is defining and explaining issues relating to lesbians for all of the English-speaking world.

452:

whenever I can, though. I have contacted Satyrn about several pages we could perhaps create together, and he did not get back to me. I assume he must be busy. If anyone is interested in working on gay lobbying/life in the South (of the US), feel free to write on my

687:

we're so awash with willing participants that we're in much danger of a too-many-cooks scenario. That should help guard against anyone becoming too entrenched in their roles: I think the more informal these responsibilities are, the better that risk can be avoided.

1941:

Did the media in Australia say they got the info from Knowledge first? Did they at least report that we were protecting the article, trying to wait for published verification before making repeated mistakes, such as with Sinbad and Chris Benoit? Course not...

202:

Fret not. "Good luck with that" was the encouraging commentary. Seriously, I'm not looking for guilt or praise or anything else. I'm just saying - we should discuss the direction of the project, and I was sharing my impetus for this discussion.

1898:

covers a lot of ground and, somewhat logically, similar issues that allow people to dress as the see fit affect many communities and many of the issues, like hate crime legislation really should cover people regardless of who they sleep with.

1712:

action happened, but I do not get the impression that there was a subculture of openly gay cowboys and they created the need for a gay rodeo. 100+ years between the Old West and the inception of the idea of a gay rodeo causes more skepticism.

1295:

is considered substantial enough to stand alone, then all such articles would be, no? All states would have that many sources. If we are going for a standard approach, i don't see why future articles should be treated differently from current

2589:

It's due to the info boxes on the top right and that template boxes at the bottom don't shrink in width. The solution is to add more content or shorten the infoboxes. Unless there is something else I don't know about (which is possible).

3106:

could be tied to LGBT if you try. They have less than 500 edits so working through to find supporting diffs, IMHO, is needed. The irony is that articles end up improving when targeted in this way so in a backward sense this helps them.

2228:

crossdressing this and the sexuality wikiprojects are the main ones that cover this content as "go-to experts", much like the porn project helps on all articles concerning porn, we help on all articles regarding transgender issues.

3383:

since it was a promotional piece written by the guy who owns badpuppy.com, but I told him I would look around and see if I could find any articles that might want to either describe online gay porn sites in general or list some;

959:

an incredible amount of work, that has continued despite each of us spiraling on our own paths. I think we should aim for sustainable support and growth with lots of breaks for drama, dancing and cocktails - just like real life.

1965:

written, and they used that. It's unclear whether the newspaper was tipped off directly by Lee Keith (the anon IP that was adding the death info to the article and put lots of info in the talk page) or whether they got it from

297:

Actually I have no idea how to get involved in a peer review. or I would. But I agree about a wikiproject spark plug being needed. That is something any organization needs and without one, it doesn't tend to grow and thrive. —

1335:

That's what i thought. And with a section redirect, the reader even goes directly to the appropriate section, while able to simply scroll to find related info. Should we start moving/merging the samller ones, and wait to see

2002:

and I've confirmed it off-wiki as well as tracing the IP to her office. I also know who the IP who was reverting the additions was, having confirmed that off-wiki with someone who was alongside them when they were doing it.

3553:

between gay and straight people. So now these 2 editors want it gone altogether. I've reverted their deletion, as has other editors. I think it's time to weigh in on a consensus discussion so we can put this issue to rest.

3278:

and similarly if there is an active template covering South America. They would be the most current, and possibly, invested, in creating and updating this. Alternatively, or in conjunction, you could ask for help at the

427:

Personally, my overall Knowledge activity has dwindled, not solely on this project. I am far more busy this year, and I don't have enough time to focus on research - too much (heteronormative) coursework. (I did create

183:

Eek. I think I was the one who said "good luck with that" but I honestly had no intention of being discouraging or disparaging. Rather, it was an attempt to sympathize over what a difficult task the re-write would be.

532:), to assist in their maintenance. If we were to start using importance-levels, this would be a help. (especially considering that probably half of our 9500 articles are celesbians, Family Guy episodes, and the like) 353:

I know we are all special, but i don't think that has a big effect on the lack of cohesion of the project. My FT and 5 featured lists were essentially ignored even after multiple posts here and at members talk pages,

3133:

has made 217 mainspace edits, and not all of them relate to gay issues. Based on a rather rough count, about 46% of those article edits are related in some way to LGBT issues. And I agreed with him on one such edit

358:, they were equally ignored by the SF-project, and comics-project and members, even by editors who had been editing the pages in the past. These are all big projects, with lots of members, but little organisation. 1674:, and have a coordinated effort to add state-specific content for each major section - ideally with sourcing. In this way anyone could look at their state article and either find or figure out the info they seek. 1213:

article? Also to the original post at top, those articles both seem accurate and distinct, there was same-sex marriage and there now exists domestic partnerships and both garnered plenty of media coverage.

256:

AIDS. Some people are charismatic enough to lead movements by themselves (I ain't it), but the led movement should have some responsibility to pick itself up and carry on when the leader is no longer there.

3664:

Promiscuity is a much more ingrained part of LGBT culture than straight culture. I'm not saying that as a negative thing by the way, I'm just saying it is true. I rather think it's probably a good thing.

3216:

is trans - I just don't know how yet until I research. And I have a lot of photo work to do. Great DJ - this was one of those huge 1,000 person clubs. Photos of the men and women that night over at my

3630:

LOL, the "bathhouses content" can stay so long as neither one of the "conservative editors" are responsible for its inclusion? You really need to read up on what editing collaboration is all about.

3475:'s talk page lacks the template, I decided to get a second opinion: Do unconfirmed rumors that someone might have been gay fall into the category of "all LGBT-related issues on Knowledge"? Thanks. 2416:

Kay, I went through it all and picked at some stuff. Don't know if a made a whole lot of difference, but I caught some spelling mistakes and tried to clean up the sentences in one or two places.

690:

Sure, there's a balance to be struck between the inspiring (guilt-tripping?) power of having your name down to do something that probably won't get done if you don't step up, and the risk that the

3490:

I read the information that Buchanan lived with Alabama Senator Rufus Devane King and that they were so close and so much together that Washington gossips called King the First Lady. I read it in

313:

February. IIRC, the last one chosen was actually not for January 2009, but for January 2008! Of course, I have yet to head over to the chosen CotM for this month. I should do that, as I think we

401:

Right off the top of my head two positions that don't need voting right now are newsletter writer and a kind of talk page whipper. I have written a couple of newsletters in the past. I have the

2956:

every time you edit a page, to explain your rationale; vandals relatively seldom use them, meaning regular users sometimes revert unsummarized changes on sight in case they're vandalism.

2266:

campaign. Right now, the page is a stub, and I don't intend to put much more work into it, so I thought someone from this WP might like to take on the task of expanding it. Thank you.

570:

I know three folks were trying to un- and de-tangle the cats; I'd like to see Satyrnbot or replacement restarted and maybe talkpage whip could dovetail with watching article alerts.

2747: 1983:

How do you know who the anon is, and do we need to be naming that person if she has chosen not to create an account? Did she identify herself in an edit? Or is this off-wiki info?

709:

Maybe we just need to have members take turns in the DJ booth in our WikiDisco. No elections, just "Ok I think I'm done now. Who's next?" in sessions that last weeks or months. --

168:

So how about using this as an opportunity to discuss where we're going and how we're getting there? And if anyone wants to participate in the peer review, by all means go nuts. --

743:

And like the dishes in the dorms, a list of who should do what is sometimes essential. A daily rota was essential in all the student houses i liked in just to keep the rats away!

1312:

In that example I think a merge would make sense. clicking the article link would still lead to the same content but in the larger article regarding LGBT rights in that state.

2343:

Anyone with some time to copyedit check out this article, i'm putting it up for GAN today, so any errors fixed while it is waiting for a reviwer would be of great help. Thanks

3528:

A 2007 study reported that two large population surveys found "the majority of gay men had similar numbers of unprotected sexual partners annually as straight men and women."

363: 97: 89: 84: 72: 67: 59: 899:

my changing the coordinator page to list the 4 volunteers so far, so we can at least get the newsletter organised (and that way solicit more active editors and opinions).

835:

I think the 1 and 2 put too much responsibility on one person, risking burnout, and 5 simply wont work, becasue it never did before. So i would go for 3 as first choice.

3080: 1629:

Update. Just a note that I'm looking at doing a 50-state project and will likely want to tie this in to a dissolving sub page and mention in the next LGBT newsletter.

3610:. I imagine straight people visiting whorehouses are just as prone to getting syphilis and who said unprotected sex was only a gay sex perk? Their agenda is obvious. 3500:

represents figures' sexualities as any other group. I personally would not like to see contemporary or historic figures lives being twisted to fit anyone's agenda. --

1057:. This WikiProject has rated these two Oregon articles Stub and Start class, respectively, and I think merging them would mutually improve their quality. Thoughts? — 2390:

I did a little more, though I'm not really confident at all that I'm actually helping. Could someone take a look at my edits to that page when they get the chance?

529: 3492: 2730: 2683: 3272: 1619: 3335:

I thought the north america marriage map was up-to-date (generally SVG maps in use on English Knowledge get more lovin), do some of the states need updating?

1561: 1581: 1571: 554:

Would we get 5 or 7 volunteers? There are just about that many that comment regularly here, but some may prefer not to get tangled in project coordinating.

3909:

Goodreau SM, Golden MR (2007). "Biological and demographic causes of high HIV and sexually transmitted disease prevalence in men who have sex with men".

3776:

Goodreau SM, Golden MR (2007). "Biological and demographic causes of high HIV and sexually transmitted disease prevalence in men who have sex with men".

1566: 2777: 1576: 1054: 437: 2457:

If you need any more articles looked over just give me a holler. I like to have things to do on here, but have a hard time finding them myself. :3

2281:

Thanks for the heads up; if you see any sources or content but short on energy you can always post them to the article's talkpage for others to use.

3850:

Alan P. Bell and Martin S. Weinberg, Homosexualities: A study of Diversity Among Men and Women, p. 308, Table 7, New York: Simon and Schuster, 1978.

1556: 1050: 1053:. They cover very similar and closely related topics, and I've noticed that this is the convention for articles like these for other states, like 409:

written by a screaming queen, and supportive of the multiple efforts of WP:LBGT members. I tried to capture Jeff's energy, but I fell short. Alas.

47: 17: 3355:)..... will upload a Central/Caribbean map once I figure out where Jimbo stuck those missing islands from the blank Americas map I was using :-D 3404: 405:, but I am inconsistent. A monthly thing would be best. One of the reasons Jeff is so sorely missed is because his newsletters were hilarious, 117: 3824: 3731: 3690: 3543:

data will show that in the 93 cases involving gay and bisexual men this year, the group reported having 1,225 sexual partners." In 2007, the

2570: 2017:

Oh, ok I see that. The strange placing of it in the middle of the post confused me. (It doesn't look like a signature coming where it does.

2573:? See the big white space where everything is pushed down below the level of the template? Is there anyway we can force it not to do that? 694:

entailed in that turns you into the Genghis Khan of WPLGBT, but I think we can negotiate it as long as we're all civil, open, and clueful.

2924:, its presence there means it's already been added to the list of article's under this project's scope. I see it's also already listed in 3548:

population surveys found "the majority of gay men had similar numbers of unprotected sexual partners annually as straight men and women."

2082:

Not at all! But that's down to a quirk of timing ie, you being on. If you'd not been around, then it could have been here for a while! --

1857:

Sadly, one of his ex-wives went against his wishes and announced the death to the media before the funeral, so it's now verifiable. :( --

3330: 2262:

I am not a member of this WikiProject, but I wanted to call your attention to a page I have created that might belong in this WP: the

1610: 1595: 1519: 826:

Can we at least decide on which approach we want to try? There is no point saying who would do what until we know what there is to do.

1534: 1209:

But that's with the presumption there is enough material to sustain an article? Otherwise the relevant content can grow in a parent

385:

access to a deposit library if things need sourcing, but am willing to have a crack at anything. So I'll keep watching this space.

1494: 1472: 1449: 3033:

rise in Syphilis among Gay and bisexual men is about at bias blaming native Africans for spreading AIDS because they are Black.

3043: 1539: 1524: 1489: 1065: 996:

I'd say add them as sub coordinators with a note, it will give us something to write about in the newsletter if nothing else!

3130: 2982: 2925: 2468: 2427: 2401: 2372: 1605: 1544: 1418:

Outdent. If you could start a new thread regarding the timeline articles and cite which template I'd be happy to look at it.

1038: 252:

problems other groups don't have. The ridiculous effort in just keeping the project templates on the talk page is an example.

3859: 2607: 1600: 1588: 1529: 1509: 1499: 3306:

There is a North America map on commons that potentially could be updated. I imagine that would change every few months.

2985:

has a definite agenda against gay rights content on Knowledge. Feel free to add many of the articles to your watchlist.

1549: 1504: 1461: 1292: 1187:

I definitely agree with moving to "Recognition of same-sex unions" in those states where there is no same-sex marriage.

3352: 2921: 1043: 1377:

decade or longer articles, per the AfD, but they still need a lot of cleanup, and a better naviagation template made.

3333:

is up-to-date, it would just be a matter of converting columns 3 & 4 (plus the various US states) to a SVG map.

3204: 3195: 3186: 3177: 3168: 2701:

Have any of them sunk? Because...you know...the SS Lesbian went down...is awful, but I just couldn't help myself. --

402: 3034: 1457: 38: 3159: 592:

coordinators of this discussion, so maybe they will continue with that at least, or we can get the code passed on.

3728: 3687: 3029:

I'd point out information from the Catholic Education Resource center is inherently bias. And over emphasizing a

2742: 2724: 1514: 1270:

state articles on these subjects can grow in their centralized articles until they are sustainable on their own.

869: 794: 3737: 3715: 3696: 3674: 3659: 3639: 3625: 3597: 3583: 3568: 3509: 3484: 3446: 3428: 3397: 3364: 3346: 3322: 3299: 3262: 3240: 3146: 3123: 3092: 3071: 3056: 3024: 3008: 2970: 2914: 2888: 2866: 2837: 2815: 2794: 2710: 2695: 2641: 2626: 2599: 2583: 2559: 2534: 2519: 2498: 2477: 2452: 2436: 2410: 2381: 2354: 2331: 2297: 2275: 2245: 2218: 2196: 2175: 2160: 2137: 2111: 2097: 2077: 2062: 2027: 2012: 1993: 1978: 1951: 1932: 1915: 1888: 1866: 1851: 1816: 1779: 1749: 1725: 1690: 1664: 1645: 1434: 1388: 1369: 1347: 1328: 1307: 1286: 1261: 1230: 1196: 1178: 1144: 1123: 1108: 1094: 1068: 1012: 991: 975: 929: 910: 873: 846: 821:

or no coordinator and find more people, who will take on responsibilites automatically, but with no recognition.

798: 754: 718: 703: 681: 653: 586: 565: 541: 509: 495: 462: 422: 394: 378: 347: 327: 307: 287: 272: 242: 212: 193: 177: 136: 1738:

pirates were loving a bit of gay sex, so it seems likely that an acedemic claims similar things about Cowboys.)

1075: 441: 2487:

Ah, if anyone prefers to do the review rather than editing, it would be great to not have to wait a month :-).

444:

any more. In other words, I am lagging behind in terms of Queer Theory. I do try to add references taken from

3250:

Could you make maps over recognition of same-sex unions in North America and South America similar this map?

2785:

The Lebanese may have something to say about that. I wonder if April Fools' translates to the Middle East. --

3588:

Although I will say that the 2001 stuff about the bathhouses and the number of sexual partners should stay.

3539: 3524:. 2 of our more conservative editors (CENSEI and Ejnogarb) are hell-bent on removing the following content: 3360: 2008: 1974: 1928: 1862: 1847: 3251: 3480: 2900: 2304: 1969:. So in this case, nobody in the media has actually pointed fingers at wikipedia at all that I know of. -- 3838: 3937: 3804: 3703: 3280: 2337: 1800:

so that should at least give a stay of execution for those who haven't encountered gay cowboys before.

2855:

took an hour to upload! But to give an example of some the types of gay nightclub shots I'll have. --

2847: 2735: 2717: 3723: 3682: 3471:

and previous discussions on the talk page for information on the "questions" about his sexuality. As

3385: 3373: 3342: 3234: 2860: 2214: 649: 537: 259:

I have a feeling we have the ideas of what should be done and the knowledge of how to do it, but the

2952:

to establish that something merits an encyclopedia article here. You should also consider adding an

772:

It seems in this discussion that we have a lot of new members joining in who are unaware that there

3602:

The bathhouses content could stay if it wasn't included by 1 of the conservative editors simply as

3464: 3030: 2966: 2515: 2271: 1999: 1966: 1660: 1453: 1104: 1074:

A a first step it may make sense to have a larger discussion on standardizing all 50 states first.

699: 491: 458: 390: 3413: 3356: 3307: 3284: 3258: 3218: 3142: 3108: 3088: 3020: 2873: 2800: 2611: 2595: 2465: 2424: 2398: 2369: 2282: 2230: 2145: 2004: 1970: 1924: 1900: 1858: 1843: 1801: 1796: 1764: 1675: 1630: 1419: 1354: 1313: 1271: 1215: 1163: 1129: 1079: 997: 960: 619: 616:

is willing to do article assessment & importance, newsletter collaboration, & peer review

571: 303: 227: 189: 121: 226:

to help coordinate at least part of this which would also entail whipping up a new newsletter.

3926: 3793: 3711: 3670: 3593: 3579: 3476: 3380: 3226: 2941: 2910: 2833: 2773: 2758: 2691: 2675: 2667: 2319: 1192: 3918: 3785: 3652: 3635: 3618: 3561: 3521: 3442: 3393: 3001: 2493: 2447: 2349: 2189: 2130: 2088: 2053: 1881: 1744: 1383: 1342: 1302: 1256: 986: 905: 841: 749: 676: 560: 525: 429: 373: 333:

Ah geez, I just looked because I couldn't remember what our current CotM even was, and it's

283: 3950: 3817: 3603: 3505: 3472: 3338: 3067: 2953: 2790: 2706: 2663: 2639: 2581: 2557: 2530: 2327: 2210: 2173: 2107: 2073: 2025: 1991: 1947: 1721: 1121: 925: 714: 691: 645: 533: 505: 418: 345: 325: 268: 208: 173: 3860:

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2001/10/26/MN74893.DTL

2928:. If you want to get more attention for the article, you could try expanding it for the 3607: 3468: 2962: 2945: 2937: 2569:

Does anyone know how to prevent the formatting problems certain templates create as in

2511: 2267: 1832: 1708:

other. I know guys danced with each other and no doubt in an all male environment some

1656: 1100: 1059: 695: 608: 487: 454: 433: 386: 3897: 3764: 3254: 3138: 3084: 3016: 2990: 2929: 2591: 2458: 2417: 2391: 2362: 2044: 1839: 1671: 299: 185: 3081:

Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Agenda/POV pushing re: User:Ejnogarb

3707: 3666: 3589: 3575: 3213: 2949: 2933: 2906: 2829: 2769: 2687: 2504: 2047:

as loads of admins watch that page, rather than the few that may watch this one. --

1763:

of porn regarding gay cowboys with every imaginable innuendo certainly also exist.

1188: 445: 3870: 1099:

While we're at it, I would suggest creating an 'LGBT rights in...' for each state.

3098:

I replied on the ANI thread but feel it's scope is more a POV editing issue than

2940:

for all the material in the article. I expect that's why it's being removed from

2361::I fixed a little spelling mistake I found. I dunno what to do beyond that. :x 2043:

Just as an aside, if you need fast admin action, you'd be far better starting at

3631: 3438: 3389: 2488: 2442: 2344: 2206: 2202: 2083: 2048: 1739: 1378: 1337: 1297: 1251: 981: 900: 865: 836: 790: 744: 671: 555: 482: 368: 279: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

3881: 3351:

update: South America & North America (north from Mexico only) are up (see

2981:

I don't know the process for going about requesting a topic ban for a user but

3706:. I am also pro-pornography and pro-'inset other generally taboo thing here'. 3574:

Ugh, why can't they just go to conservepedia and do their thing? Revert them.

3501: 3063: 2920:

Hi there, and welcome to the project. If you mean the banner on the article's

2786: 2753: 2752:

Moni3, this hook only made it as far as my talk page - "…that you can pay to

2702: 2632: 2574: 2550: 2526: 2323: 2315: 2263: 2166: 2103: 2069: 2018: 1984: 1943: 1831:

If an admin is watching this page, could you please urgently protect the page

1717: 1114: 921: 710: 613: 501: 414: 338: 318: 264: 204: 169: 3898:

Sexual Behavior Does Not Explain Varying HIV Rates Among Gay And Straight Men

3765:

Sexual Behavior Does Not Explain Varying HIV Rates Among Gay And Straight Men

3408: 1734:

have a (scholarly) book called "Sodamy and the Pirate Tradition" that claims

3922: 3789: 3222: 2654:

OK, bit of a tricky one this. There were three ships which bore the name SS

1701: 3929: 3796: 2989:

has to be the most obvious, making sure there's a new "health" section in

2322:. They even used "Protect our Children" because they are so innovative. -- 1128:

It could be but that template is always hopping so I'll put a note on it.

3538:

500-999; and 28% claimed more than 1,000 lifetime male sex partners. The

2936:. In either case the first and most important thing you should do is add 812:

having one coordinator who does everything, rotating amoungst volunteers.

670:

initially intended to work on (not that i expect this, but just in case).

3221:. I have to figure out which articles these would be cool for, such as 2610:, thye handle tech issues on current templates as well as new requests. 2899:

Greetings - going through the rollercoaster of adding a wiki entry for

2872:

It's so good to see this commitment to research, hope to see you soon!

334: 113: 106: 3839:

http://www.catholiceducation.org/articles/homosexuality/ho0075.html#04

3252:

http://en.wikipedia.org/File:Same_sex_marriage_map_Europe_detailed.svg

2993:

that points out all the bad nasties you can get from having gay sex.

2765: 2659: 1716:

This may be a candidate for deletion unless it can be cleaned up. --

1113:

Wouldn't this page be a good centralized place for the discussions?

2846: 1266:

Just to be clear i think the current articles are likely fine but

3437:

Good work, and thanks. I'll keep an eye on his talk page. - Dan

661:

I think coordinators should be free to work on any of the areas,

2666:

we've created articles on two of them. The two created articles

1670:

with universal information and links to existing articles, like

449: 3644:

LOL You really need to read up on what being neutral is about.

1998:

She identified herself, including giving her email address, on

3885: 3544: 895:

think coordinators are essential. Is there any strong feeling

809:

having one coordinator who does everything, chosen by election

25: 3403:

I think Badpuppy actually might meet notability on it's own.

3388:

doesn't seem to go that route. Anyone, um, receptive? - Dan

3246:

Maps over same-sex unions in North America and South America

2068:*cough* Was the admin action taken tardy or insufficient? -- 916:

that I use to move things, like those dudes in the pilot of

1049:

I think these two articles should be merged and moved to

3329:

I could work up an Americas map in Inkscape... assuming

3079:

Note that an ANI incident report was made on this user:

1894:

Crossdressers are definitely within the LGBT community.

153:

After the rewrite was posted, I got even less feedback.

3460: 3135: 2986: 2828:

Voting is currently taking place on which hook to use.

1836: 818:

a group of coordinators with area-based responsibilites

2961:

I hope this helps, and once again welcome to WP:LGBT!

2201:

Allstar, with respect, I think you might be confusing

116:

has been completely rewritten and is now looking for

2318:

for about a year because Florida did not get enough

1162:until those section, in turn, became large enough. 3015:sources or which incorrectly cite their sources. 815:a group of coordinators to share responsibilities 2565:Annoying formatting issue with certain templates 3871:http://www.fda.gov/cber/gdlns/tissdonor.htm#iii 3702:good thing, I mean I share many views with the 500:Yeah, I can collaborate. I'm good with that. -- 2729:17:36, 26 March 2009 (UTC) Edit: here is the 8: 3882:http://www.fda.gov/CbER/dhq/dhq11/dhq11e.htm 1562:Recognition of same-sex unions in New Jersey 1582:Recognition of same-sex unions in Wisconsin 1572:Recognition of same-sex unions in Minnesota 436:, though.) Besides, I don't have access to 161:to be rewritten like the Lesbian article. 2715:That is the exact gist of the DYK's ;-)--- 1567:Recognition of same-sex unions in Maryland 3337:(nevermind, was thinking of the USA map) 1577:Recognition of same-sex unions in Vermont 438:GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 2895:The Gay Marriage Thing film in Wiki LGBT 2606:If nothing else you can ask for help at 1557:Recognition of same-sex unions in Hawaii 1051:Recognition of same-sex unions in Oregon 3757: 3155: 2926:Category:LGBT-related documentary films 1078:might be a good place to take this up. 367:project space. Time to reassign things? 18:Knowledge talk:WikiProject LGBT studies 3946: 3935: 3813: 3802: 634:willing to try to organize core topics 263:just isn't there. I don't know why. -- 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 3469:James Buchanan#Personal relationships 3463:the template for your WikiProject to 3412:enough then they can be birthed out. 2571:LGBT rights in the Dominican Republic 2441:Even typo fixes are very welcome :-). 2311:to be a battle to keep on the page. 1353:working a few of the state articles? 7: 3273:Same-sex unions in the United States 2684:nominated for an April Fools Day DYK 1835:and delete all revisions newer than 1620:Same-sex unions in the United States 3331:Template:LGBT rights table Americas 1475:and other similar nuanced articles; 980:Oki doke, i'll leave it as is then. 1611:Domestic partnership in Washington 1596:Domestic partnership in California 1520:Same-sex marriage in Massachusetts 24: 1535:Same-sex marriage in Rhode Island 3841:The Health Risks of Gay Sex: --> 3522:Talk:Promiscuity#Gay Promiscuity 3203: 3194: 3185: 3176: 3167: 3158: 3137:and said so on the talk page. — 2843:New LGBT nightlife photos coming 2658:(named after the inhabitants of 2541: 2510:Should we tag this horrible man? 1495:Same-sex marriage in Connecticut 1473:Civil union in the United States 1450:LGBT rights in the United States 864:just need to find more of them. 804:So we seem to have 5+ positions: 29: 2944:: Knowledge's cardinal rule is 1540:Same-sex marriage in Washington 1525:Same-sex marriage in New Mexico 1490:Same-sex marriage in California 3823:CS1 maint: extra punctuation ( 3152:Israeli DJ Offer Nissim photos 3131:Special:Contributions/Ejnogarb 2525:Without further hesitation. -- 1606:Domestic partnership in Oregon 1545:Same-sex marriage in Wisconsin 1039:Domestic partnership in Oregon 1: 2733:for the discussion at DYK.--- 2631:Oh, good suggestion, thanks! 2608:Knowledge:Requested templates 1625:gives a reasonable overview: 1601:Domestic partnership in Maine 1589:Civil unions in New Hampshire 1530:Same-sex marriage in New York 1510:Same-sex marriage in Illinois 1500:Same-sex marriage in Colorado 317:do more if we pull together. 2977:Obvious agenda driven editor 2932:section, and working toward 1550:Same-sex marriage in Wyoming 1505:Same-sex marriage in Florida 1293:Same-sex marriage in Wyoming 1157:I suggest that we do have a 403:template in my sandbox, here 147:Tangent introduced by Moni3: 3459:An anonymous user recently 3407:has several dozen hits and 3353:Status of same-sex marriage 1838:. This is a very sensitive 1044:Same-sex marriage in Oregon 3971: 3606:and most certainly failed 3429:22:57, 31 March 2009 (UTC) 3398:18:23, 31 March 2009 (UTC) 3365:01:38, 31 March 2009 (UTC) 3347:10:29, 30 March 2009 (UTC) 3323:12:07, 28 March 2009 (UTC) 3300:00:39, 27 March 2009 (UTC) 3263:20:43, 21 March 2009 (UTC) 3241:22:44, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 3147:09:51, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 3124:07:17, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 3093:06:50, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 3072:04:01, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 3057:03:37, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 3025:03:27, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 3009:03:13, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 2971:17:14, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 2915:20:08, 28 March 2009 (UTC) 2889:19:28, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 2867:13:41, 28 March 2009 (UTC) 2838:08:50, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 2816:01:06, 27 March 2009 (UTC) 2795:17:47, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 2778:17:42, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 2748:17:36, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 2711:17:23, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 2696:17:14, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 2642:03:49, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 2627:12:11, 28 March 2009 (UTC) 2600:01:00, 28 March 2009 (UTC) 2584:00:47, 28 March 2009 (UTC) 2560:16:27, 27 March 2009 (UTC) 2535:12:38, 27 March 2009 (UTC) 2520:12:10, 27 March 2009 (UTC) 2499:10:54, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 2478:10:56, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 2453:10:54, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 2437:10:41, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 2411:10:15, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 2382:09:59, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 2355:09:47, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 2332:16:16, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 2298:00:58, 27 March 2009 (UTC) 2276:01:32, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 2246:00:56, 27 March 2009 (UTC) 2219:00:53, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 2197:18:25, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 2176:18:14, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 2161:06:30, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 2138:04:51, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 2112:15:32, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 2098:15:26, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 2078:15:17, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 2063:15:15, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 2028:15:13, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 2013:15:07, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 1994:14:51, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 1979:14:34, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 1952:13:50, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 1933:13:38, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 1916:08:47, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 1889:04:34, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 1867:04:15, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 1852:23:05, 23 March 2009 (UTC) 1817:00:43, 27 March 2009 (UTC) 1780:09:01, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 1750:07:35, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 1726:22:35, 23 March 2009 (UTC) 1691:15:03, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 1665:23:19, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 1646:09:27, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 1440:Overview of current status 1435:11:12, 18 March 2009 (UTC) 1389:10:58, 18 March 2009 (UTC) 1370:10:39, 18 March 2009 (UTC) 1348:09:51, 18 March 2009 (UTC) 1329:09:38, 18 March 2009 (UTC) 1308:09:03, 18 March 2009 (UTC) 1287:08:59, 18 March 2009 (UTC) 1262:08:55, 18 March 2009 (UTC) 1231:14:02, 17 March 2009 (UTC) 1197:12:10, 17 March 2009 (UTC) 1179:07:35, 17 March 2009 (UTC) 1145:07:28, 17 March 2009 (UTC) 1124:06:55, 17 March 2009 (UTC) 1109:06:10, 17 March 2009 (UTC) 1095:03:30, 17 March 2009 (UTC) 1069:23:24, 16 March 2009 (UTC) 1013:14:56, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 992:10:16, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 976:09:24, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 930:12:29, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 911:07:48, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 874:01:05, 18 March 2009 (UTC) 847:16:55, 13 March 2009 (UTC) 799:15:39, 13 March 2009 (UTC) 755:16:54, 13 March 2009 (UTC) 719:15:17, 13 March 2009 (UTC) 704:10:46, 13 March 2009 (UTC) 682:09:38, 13 March 2009 (UTC) 654:01:41, 13 March 2009 (UTC) 587:13:58, 12 March 2009 (UTC) 566:11:05, 12 March 2009 (UTC) 542:20:35, 11 March 2009 (UTC) 510:12:17, 12 March 2009 (UTC) 496:20:00, 11 March 2009 (UTC) 463:18:14, 11 March 2009 (UTC) 423:13:16, 11 March 2009 (UTC) 395:09:17, 11 March 2009 (UTC) 379:07:51, 11 March 2009 (UTC) 348:17:10, 10 March 2009 (UTC) 328:17:07, 10 March 2009 (UTC) 308:16:48, 10 March 2009 (UTC) 288:15:48, 10 March 2009 (UTC) 273:14:56, 10 March 2009 (UTC) 243:14:38, 10 March 2009 (UTC) 213:14:26, 10 March 2009 (UTC) 194:14:13, 10 March 2009 (UTC) 178:14:00, 10 March 2009 (UTC) 137:10:07, 10 March 2009 (UTC) 3888:Blood Donor Questionnaire 3738:05:46, 2 April 2009 (UTC) 3716:01:51, 2 April 2009 (UTC) 3697:01:38, 2 April 2009 (UTC) 3675:23:27, 1 April 2009 (UTC) 3660:20:46, 1 April 2009 (UTC) 3640:20:41, 1 April 2009 (UTC) 3626:20:33, 1 April 2009 (UTC) 3598:20:27, 1 April 2009 (UTC) 3584:20:25, 1 April 2009 (UTC) 3569:20:11, 1 April 2009 (UTC) 3510:17:28, 1 April 2009 (UTC) 3485:17:19, 1 April 2009 (UTC) 3447:03:41, 1 April 2009 (UTC) 3283:to see if they can help. 1515:Same-sex marriage in Iowa 666:when people go on breaks. 639:Scope of new coordinators 432:'s page while working on 3455:Question about inclusion 1076:Template:Same-sex unions 481:I'd love to take up the 442:Journal of Homosexuality 120:. All help appreciated. 3923:10.1136/sti.2007.025627 3790:10.1136/sti.2007.025627 3540:San Francisco Chronicle 2316:this awesome commercial 1827:Admin assistance needed 692:phenomenal cosmic power 2901:The Gay Marriage Thing 2851: 2305:Thomas More Law Center 337:. Shame, shame on me! 3704:sex-positive movement 3281:Knowledge:Graphic Lab 3129:I agree with Benji. 2850: 2338:LGBT themes in comics 42:of past discussions. 3386:internet pornography 3374:User talk:BillRivers 3268:I would ask over at 1484:In addition we have: 1471:In addition we have 1452:and subarticles for 3533:It originally was: 3516:Promiscuity article 3493:Lies Across America 3465:Talk:James Buchanan 2950:third-party sources 2934:good article status 2662:, Greece). Over at 2320:moral panic in 1977 2000:Talk:Peter Wherrett 1967:Talk:Peter Wherrett 1291:Ah, ok. I think if 1211:LGBT rights in ____ 954:I'm not opposed to 142:Where are we going? 3945:Unknown parameter 3812:Unknown parameter 3655: 3621: 3564: 3496:several years ago. 3004: 2852: 2192: 2133: 1884: 1797:Brokeback Mountain 1448:We currently have 1159:LGBT right in ____ 109:peer review sought 3911:Sex Transm Infect 3778:Sex Transm Infect 3651: 3617: 3560: 3054: 3000: 2942:Same-Sex Marriage 2938:inline references 2474: 2433: 2407: 2378: 2188: 2129: 1880: 103: 102: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 3962: 3955: 3954: 3948: 3943: 3941: 3933: 3906: 3900: 3895: 3889: 3879: 3873: 3868: 3862: 3857: 3851: 3848: 3842: 3835: 3829: 3828: 3821: 3815: 3810: 3808: 3800: 3773: 3767: 3762: 3658: 3650: 3624: 3616: 3567: 3559: 3425: 3419: 3405:Adult Video News 3319: 3313: 3296: 3290: 3277: 3271: 3237: 3232: 3229:or whatever. -- 3207: 3198: 3189: 3180: 3171: 3162: 3120: 3114: 3053: 3044: 3041: 3007: 2999: 2948:, or the use of 2885: 2879: 2863: 2858: 2812: 2806: 2738: 2720: 2623: 2617: 2549: 2545: 2544: 2475: 2470: 2462: 2434: 2429: 2421: 2408: 2403: 2395: 2379: 2374: 2366: 2294: 2288: 2242: 2236: 2195: 2187: 2157: 2151: 2136: 2128: 2095: 2086: 2060: 2051: 1912: 1906: 1887: 1879: 1813: 1807: 1776: 1770: 1687: 1681: 1642: 1636: 1624: 1618: 1431: 1425: 1366: 1360: 1325: 1319: 1283: 1277: 1227: 1221: 1175: 1169: 1141: 1135: 1091: 1085: 1062: 1009: 1003: 972: 966: 631: 625: 583: 577: 239: 233: 133: 127: 81: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 3970: 3969: 3965: 3964: 3963: 3961: 3960: 3959: 3958: 3944: 3934: 3908: 3907: 3903: 3896: 3892: 3880: 3876: 3869: 3865: 3858: 3854: 3849: 3845: 3836: 3832: 3822: 3811: 3801: 3784:(6 :): 458–62. 3775: 3774: 3770: 3763: 3759: 3734: 3726: 3724:Teledildonix314 3693: 3685: 3683:Teledildonix314 3656: 3648: 3622: 3614: 3565: 3557: 3518: 3473:William R. King 3457: 3423: 3417: 3379:I just deleted 3377: 3317: 3311: 3294: 3288: 3275: 3269: 3248: 3235: 3230: 3208: 3199: 3190: 3181: 3172: 3163: 3154: 3118: 3112: 3045: 3035: 3005: 2997: 2979: 2897: 2883: 2877: 2861: 2856: 2845: 2810: 2804: 2736: 2718: 2652: 2621: 2615: 2567: 2542: 2540: 2508: 2469: 2460: 2428: 2419: 2402: 2393: 2373: 2364: 2341: 2308: 2292: 2286: 2260: 2240: 2234: 2193: 2185: 2155: 2149: 2134: 2126: 2089: 2084: 2054: 2049: 1910: 1904: 1885: 1877: 1829: 1811: 1805: 1774: 1768: 1705: 1685: 1679: 1640: 1634: 1622: 1616: 1442: 1429: 1423: 1364: 1358: 1323: 1317: 1281: 1275: 1225: 1219: 1173: 1167: 1139: 1133: 1089: 1083: 1067: 1058: 1035: 1007: 1001: 970: 964: 641: 629: 623: 605: 603:Who is willing? 581: 575: 237: 231: 144: 131: 125: 111: 77: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3968: 3966: 3957: 3956: 3901: 3890: 3874: 3863: 3852: 3843: 3830: 3768: 3756: 3755: 3754: 3753: 3752: 3751: 3750: 3749: 3748: 3747: 3746: 3745: 3744: 3743: 3742: 3741: 3740: 3732: 3722: 3691: 3681: 3586: 3550: 3549: 3531: 3530: 3529: 3517: 3514: 3513: 3512: 3497: 3456: 3453: 3452: 3451: 3450: 3449: 3432: 3431: 3376: 3371: 3370: 3369: 3368: 3367: 3326: 3325: 3303: 3302: 3247: 3244: 3212:I want to say 3210: 3209: 3202: 3200: 3193: 3191: 3184: 3182: 3175: 3173: 3166: 3164: 3157: 3153: 3150: 3127: 3126: 3102:LGBT although 3077: 3076: 3075: 3074: 3059: 3038:The Bookkeeper 2978: 2975: 2974: 2973: 2958: 2957: 2896: 2893: 2892: 2891: 2844: 2841: 2827: 2825: 2824: 2823: 2822: 2821: 2820: 2819: 2818: 2797: 2783:FOR THE WIN!!! 2737:I'm Spartacus! 2719:I'm Spartacus! 2651: 2650:SS Lesbian DYK 2648: 2647: 2646: 2645: 2644: 2603: 2602: 2566: 2563: 2538: 2537: 2507: 2502: 2485: 2484: 2483: 2482: 2481: 2480: 2414: 2385: 2340: 2335: 2307: 2302: 2301: 2300: 2259: 2256: 2255: 2254: 2253: 2252: 2251: 2250: 2249: 2248: 2221: 2119: 2118: 2117: 2116: 2115: 2114: 2041: 2040: 2039: 2038: 2037: 2036: 2035: 2034: 2033: 2032: 2031: 2030: 1957: 1956: 1955: 1954: 1936: 1935: 1919: 1918: 1870: 1869: 1833:Peter Wherrett 1828: 1825: 1824: 1823: 1822: 1821: 1820: 1819: 1787: 1786: 1785: 1784: 1783: 1782: 1755: 1754: 1753: 1752: 1704: 1699: 1698: 1697: 1696: 1695: 1694: 1693: 1649: 1648: 1614: 1613: 1608: 1603: 1598: 1592: 1591: 1585: 1584: 1579: 1574: 1569: 1564: 1559: 1553: 1552: 1547: 1542: 1537: 1532: 1527: 1522: 1517: 1512: 1507: 1502: 1497: 1492: 1487: 1486: 1485: 1479: 1478: 1477: 1476: 1466: 1465: 1441: 1438: 1416: 1415: 1414: 1413: 1412: 1411: 1410: 1409: 1408: 1407: 1406: 1405: 1404: 1403: 1402: 1401: 1400: 1399: 1398: 1397: 1396: 1395: 1394: 1393: 1392: 1391: 1238: 1237: 1236: 1235: 1234: 1233: 1202: 1201: 1200: 1199: 1182: 1181: 1154: 1153: 1152: 1151: 1150: 1149: 1148: 1147: 1064: 1047: 1046: 1041: 1034: 1033:Merger, maybe? 1031: 1030: 1029: 1028: 1027: 1026: 1025: 1024: 1023: 1022: 1021: 1020: 1019: 1018: 1017: 1016: 1015: 941: 940: 939: 938: 937: 936: 935: 934: 933: 932: 913: 883: 882: 881: 880: 879: 878: 877: 876: 854: 853: 852: 851: 850: 849: 828: 827: 823: 822: 819: 816: 813: 810: 806: 805: 770: 769: 768: 767: 766: 765: 764: 763: 762: 761: 760: 759: 758: 757: 728: 727: 726: 725: 724: 723: 722: 721: 688: 667: 640: 637: 636: 635: 617: 611: 604: 601: 600: 599: 598: 597: 596: 595: 594: 593: 552: 548: 521: 520: 519: 518: 517: 516: 515: 514: 513: 512: 472: 471: 470: 469: 468: 467: 466: 465: 434:Roland Barthes 410: 351: 350: 295: 294: 293: 292: 291: 290: 257: 253: 246: 245: 223: 218: 217: 216: 215: 197: 196: 143: 140: 110: 104: 101: 100: 95: 92: 87: 82: 75: 70: 65: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3967: 3952: 3939: 3931: 3928: 3924: 3920: 3917:(6): 458–62. 3916: 3912: 3905: 3902: 3899: 3894: 3891: 3887: 3883: 3878: 3875: 3872: 3867: 3864: 3861: 3856: 3853: 3847: 3844: 3840: 3834: 3831: 3826: 3819: 3806: 3798: 3795: 3791: 3787: 3783: 3779: 3772: 3769: 3766: 3761: 3758: 3739: 3735: 3729: 3725: 3719: 3718: 3717: 3713: 3709: 3705: 3700: 3699: 3698: 3694: 3688: 3684: 3678: 3677: 3676: 3672: 3668: 3663: 3662: 3661: 3654: 3647: 3643: 3642: 3641: 3637: 3633: 3629: 3628: 3627: 3620: 3613: 3609: 3605: 3601: 3600: 3599: 3595: 3591: 3587: 3585: 3581: 3577: 3573: 3572: 3571: 3570: 3563: 3556: 3546: 3541: 3536: 3535: 3534: 3527: 3526: 3525: 3523: 3515: 3511: 3507: 3503: 3498: 3495: 3494: 3489: 3488: 3487: 3486: 3482: 3478: 3474: 3470: 3466: 3462: 3454: 3448: 3444: 3440: 3436: 3435: 3434: 3433: 3430: 3427: 3426: 3420: 3410: 3406: 3402: 3401: 3400: 3399: 3395: 3391: 3387: 3382: 3375: 3372: 3366: 3362: 3358: 3354: 3350: 3349: 3348: 3344: 3340: 3336: 3332: 3328: 3327: 3324: 3321: 3320: 3314: 3305: 3304: 3301: 3298: 3297: 3291: 3282: 3274: 3267: 3266: 3265: 3264: 3260: 3256: 3253: 3245: 3243: 3242: 3239: 3238: 3228: 3224: 3220: 3215: 3206: 3201: 3197: 3192: 3188: 3183: 3179: 3174: 3170: 3165: 3161: 3156: 3151: 3149: 3148: 3144: 3140: 3136: 3132: 3125: 3122: 3121: 3115: 3105: 3101: 3097: 3096: 3095: 3094: 3090: 3086: 3082: 3073: 3069: 3065: 3060: 3058: 3055: 3051: 3050: 3049:of the Occult 3042: 3040: 3039: 3032: 3028: 3027: 3026: 3022: 3018: 3013: 3012: 3011: 3010: 3003: 2996: 2992: 2991:Homosexuality 2988: 2984: 2976: 2972: 2968: 2964: 2960: 2959: 2955: 2951: 2947: 2943: 2939: 2935: 2931: 2930:Did You Know? 2927: 2923: 2919: 2918: 2917: 2916: 2912: 2908: 2904: 2902: 2894: 2890: 2887: 2886: 2880: 2871: 2870: 2869: 2868: 2865: 2864: 2849: 2842: 2840: 2839: 2835: 2831: 2817: 2814: 2813: 2807: 2798: 2796: 2792: 2788: 2784: 2781: 2780: 2779: 2775: 2771: 2767: 2763: 2762: 2761: 2755: 2751: 2750: 2749: 2746: 2745: 2744: 2740: 2739: 2732: 2728: 2727: 2726: 2722: 2721: 2714: 2713: 2712: 2708: 2704: 2700: 2699: 2698: 2697: 2693: 2689: 2685: 2681: 2679: 2673: 2671: 2665: 2661: 2657: 2649: 2643: 2640: 2638: 2637: 2636: 2630: 2629: 2628: 2625: 2624: 2618: 2609: 2605: 2604: 2601: 2597: 2593: 2588: 2587: 2586: 2585: 2582: 2580: 2579: 2578: 2572: 2564: 2562: 2561: 2558: 2556: 2555: 2554: 2548: 2536: 2532: 2528: 2524: 2523: 2522: 2521: 2517: 2513: 2506: 2503: 2501: 2500: 2497: 2496: 2492: 2491: 2479: 2476: 2473: 2466: 2464: 2463: 2456: 2455: 2454: 2451: 2450: 2446: 2445: 2440: 2439: 2438: 2435: 2432: 2425: 2423: 2422: 2415: 2413: 2412: 2409: 2406: 2399: 2397: 2396: 2388: 2387: 2384: 2383: 2380: 2377: 2370: 2368: 2367: 2359: 2358: 2357: 2356: 2353: 2352: 2348: 2347: 2339: 2336: 2334: 2333: 2329: 2325: 2321: 2317: 2312: 2306: 2303: 2299: 2296: 2295: 2289: 2280: 2279: 2278: 2277: 2273: 2269: 2265: 2257: 2247: 2244: 2243: 2237: 2227: 2222: 2220: 2216: 2212: 2208: 2204: 2200: 2199: 2198: 2191: 2184: 2179: 2178: 2177: 2174: 2172: 2171: 2170: 2164: 2163: 2162: 2159: 2158: 2152: 2142: 2141: 2140: 2139: 2132: 2125: 2113: 2109: 2105: 2102:Good save! -- 2101: 2100: 2099: 2096: 2094: 2093: 2087: 2081: 2080: 2079: 2075: 2071: 2067: 2066: 2065: 2064: 2061: 2059: 2058: 2052: 2046: 2029: 2026: 2024: 2023: 2022: 2016: 2015: 2014: 2010: 2006: 2005:AliceJMarkham 2001: 1997: 1996: 1995: 1992: 1990: 1989: 1988: 1982: 1981: 1980: 1976: 1972: 1971:AliceJMarkham 1968: 1963: 1962: 1961: 1960: 1959: 1958: 1953: 1949: 1945: 1940: 1939: 1938: 1937: 1934: 1930: 1926: 1925:AliceJMarkham 1921: 1920: 1917: 1914: 1913: 1907: 1897: 1893: 1892: 1891: 1890: 1883: 1876: 1868: 1864: 1860: 1859:AliceJMarkham 1856: 1855: 1854: 1853: 1849: 1845: 1844:AliceJMarkham 1841: 1837: 1834: 1826: 1818: 1815: 1814: 1808: 1799: 1798: 1793: 1792: 1791: 1790: 1789: 1788: 1781: 1778: 1777: 1771: 1761: 1760: 1759: 1758: 1757: 1756: 1751: 1748: 1747: 1743: 1742: 1737: 1732: 1731: 1730: 1729: 1728: 1727: 1723: 1719: 1714: 1711: 1703: 1700: 1692: 1689: 1688: 1682: 1673: 1672:LGBT adoption 1668: 1667: 1666: 1662: 1658: 1653: 1652: 1651: 1650: 1647: 1644: 1643: 1637: 1628: 1627: 1626: 1621: 1612: 1609: 1607: 1604: 1602: 1599: 1597: 1594: 1593: 1590: 1587: 1586: 1583: 1580: 1578: 1575: 1573: 1570: 1568: 1565: 1563: 1560: 1558: 1555: 1554: 1551: 1548: 1546: 1543: 1541: 1538: 1536: 1533: 1531: 1528: 1526: 1523: 1521: 1518: 1516: 1513: 1511: 1508: 1506: 1503: 1501: 1498: 1496: 1493: 1491: 1488: 1483: 1482: 1481: 1480: 1474: 1470: 1469: 1468: 1467: 1463: 1462:New Hampshire 1459: 1455: 1451: 1447: 1444: 1443: 1439: 1437: 1436: 1433: 1432: 1426: 1390: 1387: 1386: 1382: 1381: 1375: 1374: 1373: 1372: 1371: 1368: 1367: 1361: 1351: 1350: 1349: 1346: 1345: 1341: 1340: 1334: 1333: 1332: 1331: 1330: 1327: 1326: 1320: 1311: 1310: 1309: 1306: 1305: 1301: 1300: 1294: 1290: 1289: 1288: 1285: 1284: 1278: 1269: 1265: 1264: 1263: 1260: 1259: 1255: 1254: 1248: 1247: 1246: 1245: 1244: 1243: 1242: 1241: 1240: 1239: 1232: 1229: 1228: 1222: 1212: 1208: 1207: 1206: 1205: 1204: 1203: 1198: 1194: 1190: 1186: 1185: 1184: 1183: 1180: 1177: 1176: 1170: 1160: 1156: 1155: 1146: 1143: 1142: 1136: 1127: 1126: 1125: 1122: 1120: 1119: 1118: 1112: 1111: 1110: 1106: 1102: 1098: 1097: 1096: 1093: 1092: 1086: 1077: 1073: 1072: 1071: 1070: 1066: 1061: 1056: 1052: 1045: 1042: 1040: 1037: 1036: 1032: 1014: 1011: 1010: 1004: 995: 994: 993: 990: 989: 985: 984: 979: 978: 977: 974: 973: 967: 957: 953: 952: 951: 950: 949: 948: 947: 946: 945: 944: 943: 942: 931: 927: 923: 919: 914: 912: 909: 908: 904: 903: 898: 893: 892: 891: 890: 889: 888: 887: 886: 885: 884: 875: 871: 868:, who misses 867: 862: 861: 860: 859: 858: 857: 856: 855: 848: 845: 844: 840: 839: 834: 833: 832: 831: 830: 829: 825: 824: 820: 817: 814: 811: 808: 807: 803: 802: 801: 800: 796: 793:, who misses 792: 786: 782: 778: 775: 756: 753: 752: 748: 747: 742: 741: 740: 739: 738: 737: 736: 735: 734: 733: 732: 731: 730: 729: 720: 716: 712: 707: 706: 705: 701: 697: 693: 689: 685: 684: 683: 680: 679: 675: 674: 668: 664: 660: 659: 658: 657: 656: 655: 651: 647: 638: 633: 632: 626: 618: 615: 612: 610: 607: 606: 602: 590: 589: 588: 585: 584: 578: 569: 568: 567: 564: 563: 559: 558: 553: 549: 545: 544: 543: 539: 535: 531: 527: 523: 522: 511: 507: 503: 499: 498: 497: 493: 489: 484: 480: 479: 478: 477: 476: 475: 474: 473: 464: 460: 456: 451: 447: 443: 439: 435: 431: 430:François Wahl 426: 425: 424: 420: 416: 411: 408: 404: 400: 399: 398: 397: 396: 392: 388: 383: 382: 381: 380: 377: 376: 372: 371: 365: 359: 357: 349: 346: 344: 343: 342: 336: 332: 331: 330: 329: 326: 324: 323: 322: 316: 310: 309: 305: 301: 289: 285: 281: 276: 275: 274: 270: 266: 262: 258: 254: 250: 249: 248: 247: 244: 241: 240: 234: 224: 220: 219: 214: 210: 206: 201: 200: 199: 198: 195: 191: 187: 182: 181: 180: 179: 175: 171: 166: 162: 158: 154: 151: 148: 141: 139: 138: 135: 134: 128: 119: 115: 108: 105: 99: 96: 93: 91: 88: 86: 83: 80: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 3938:cite journal 3914: 3910: 3904: 3893: 3877: 3866: 3855: 3846: 3833: 3805:cite journal 3781: 3777: 3771: 3760: 3645: 3611: 3554: 3551: 3532: 3519: 3491: 3477:Recognizance 3458: 3443:push to talk 3421: 3415: 3394:push to talk 3378: 3334: 3315: 3309: 3292: 3286: 3249: 3233: 3214:Offer Nissim 3211: 3128: 3116: 3110: 3103: 3099: 3078: 3048: 3047: 3037: 3036: 2994: 2980: 2954:edit summary 2905: 2898: 2881: 2875: 2859: 2853: 2826: 2808: 2802: 2782: 2768:? <g: --> 2759: 2757: 2743: 2741: 2734: 2725: 2723: 2716: 2677: 2669: 2655: 2653: 2634: 2633: 2619: 2613: 2576: 2575: 2568: 2552: 2551: 2546: 2539: 2509: 2505:Scott Lively 2494: 2489: 2486: 2471: 2459: 2448: 2443: 2430: 2418: 2404: 2392: 2389: 2386: 2375: 2363: 2360: 2350: 2345: 2342: 2313: 2309: 2290: 2284: 2261: 2238: 2232: 2225: 2182: 2168: 2167: 2165:Hear, hear! 2153: 2147: 2123: 2120: 2091: 2090: 2056: 2055: 2042: 2020: 2019: 1986: 1985: 1908: 1902: 1895: 1874: 1871: 1830: 1809: 1803: 1795: 1772: 1766: 1745: 1740: 1735: 1715: 1709: 1706: 1683: 1677: 1638: 1632: 1615: 1445: 1427: 1421: 1417: 1384: 1379: 1362: 1356: 1343: 1338: 1321: 1315: 1303: 1298: 1279: 1273: 1267: 1257: 1252: 1223: 1217: 1210: 1171: 1165: 1158: 1137: 1131: 1116: 1115: 1087: 1081: 1048: 1005: 999: 987: 982: 968: 962: 955: 917: 906: 901: 896: 842: 837: 787: 783: 779: 773: 771: 750: 745: 677: 672: 663:no ownership 662: 642: 627: 621: 579: 573: 561: 556: 446:The Advocate 406: 374: 369: 360: 355: 352: 340: 339: 320: 319: 314: 311: 296: 260: 235: 229: 167: 163: 159: 155: 152: 146: 145: 129: 123: 112: 78: 43: 37: 2207:transgender 2203:transsexual 1794:I've added 1458:Puerto Rico 483:Jimmy Olsen 118:peer review 36:This is an 3357:Outsider80 3339:Outsider80 3104:everything 2946:notability 2682:have been 2264:White Knot 2258:White Knot 2211:Queerudite 1336:reactions? 646:Outsider80 614:User:Moni3 534:Outsider80 98:Archive 30 90:Archive 26 85:Archive 25 79:Archive 24 73:Archive 23 68:Archive 22 60:Archive 20 3949:ignored ( 3816:ignored ( 3236:Shankbone 3223:Nightclub 2987:This edit 2983:this user 2963:Gonzonoir 2922:talk page 2862:Shankbone 2512:Zigzig20s 2314:They ran 2268:Jrsightes 1842:issue. -- 1710:Brokeback 1702:Gay rodeo 1657:Zigzig20s 1296:articles. 1101:Zigzig20s 1060:Athelwulf 918:Star Trek 696:Gonzonoir 609:Gonzonoir 526:WP:BONKED 488:Gonzonoir 455:Zigzig20s 453:talkpage. 387:Gonzonoir 3930:17855487 3797:17855487 3604:WP:POINT 3381:Badpuppy 3255:Ron 1987 3227:Gay life 3139:Becksguy 3085:Becksguy 3017:Ejnogarb 2664:WP:SHIPS 2592:TreyGeek 2461:Lychosis 2420:Lychosis 2394:Lychosis 2365:Lychosis 364:election 300:Becksguy 186:Otto4711 3947:|month= 3814:|month= 3708:Zazaban 3667:Zazaban 3653:ALLST☆R 3619:ALLST☆R 3608:WP:NPOV 3590:Zazaban 3576:Zazaban 3562:ALLST☆R 3002:ALLST☆R 2907:Millies 2830:Mjroots 2799:LMFAO! 2770:Mjroots 2760:Lesbian 2754:go down 2688:Mjroots 2678:Lesbian 2670:Lesbian 2656:Lesbian 2190:ALLST☆R 2131:ALLST☆R 1882:ALLST☆R 1446:Comment 1189:Hekerui 1055:Vermont 897:against 530:example 440:or the 407:clearly 335:Lesbian 114:Lesbian 107:Lesbian 39:archive 3632:CENSEI 3467:. See 3439:Dank55 3390:Dank55 3219:Flickr 3031:recent 2766:Beirut 2680:(1923) 2672:(1915) 2660:Lesbos 2045:WP:ANI 1840:WP:BLP 1268:future 956:adding 870:Jeffpw 866:Dev920 795:Jeffpw 791:Dev920 280:Haiduc 3733:4-1-1 3692:4-1-1 3502:Moni3 3461:added 3409:Alexa 3231:David 3064:Moni3 2857:David 2787:Moni3 2756:on a 2703:Moni3 2635:Aleta 2577:Aleta 2553:Aleta 2527:Moni3 2324:Moni3 2224:were 2205:with 2169:Aleta 2104:Moni3 2070:Moni3 2021:Aleta 1987:Aleta 1944:Moni3 1896:Trans 1718:Moni3 1117:Aleta 922:Moni3 711:Moni3 502:Moni3 415:Moni3 341:Aleta 321:Aleta 315:could 265:Moni3 205:Moni3 170:Moni3 16:< 3951:help 3927:PMID 3825:link 3818:help 3794:PMID 3712:talk 3671:talk 3636:talk 3594:talk 3580:talk 3520:See 3506:talk 3481:talk 3416:Banj 3361:talk 3343:talk 3310:Banj 3287:Banj 3259:talk 3143:talk 3111:Banj 3100:just 3089:talk 3083:. — 3068:talk 3021:talk 2967:talk 2911:talk 2876:Banj 2834:talk 2803:Banj 2791:talk 2774:talk 2731:link 2707:talk 2692:talk 2674:and 2614:Banj 2596:talk 2547:Done 2531:talk 2516:talk 2328:talk 2285:Banj 2272:talk 2233:Banj 2226:only 2215:talk 2148:Banj 2108:talk 2074:talk 2009:talk 1975:talk 1948:talk 1929:talk 1903:Banj 1863:talk 1848:talk 1804:Banj 1767:Banj 1736:most 1722:talk 1678:Banj 1661:talk 1633:Banj 1460:and 1454:Utah 1422:Banj 1357:Banj 1316:Banj 1274:Banj 1218:Banj 1193:talk 1166:Banj 1132:Banj 1105:talk 1082:Banj 1000:Banj 963:Banj 926:talk 920:. -- 715:talk 700:talk 650:talk 622:Banj 574:Banj 538:talk 506:talk 492:talk 459:talk 450:Tetu 419:talk 391:talk 304:talk 284:talk 269:talk 261:push 230:Banj 209:talk 190:talk 174:talk 124:Banj 3919:doi 3886:FDA 3884:US 3786:doi 3545:FDA 3414:-- 3308:-- 3285:-- 3225:or 3109:-- 2874:-- 2801:-- 2764:in 2676:SS 2668:SS 2612:-- 2495:Mod 2490:Yob 2449:Mod 2444:Yob 2351:Mod 2346:Yob 2283:-- 2231:-- 2146:-- 2085:Ged 2050:Ged 1901:-- 1802:-- 1765:-- 1746:Mod 1741:Yob 1676:-- 1631:-- 1420:-- 1385:Mod 1380:Yob 1355:-- 1344:Mod 1339:Yob 1314:-- 1304:Mod 1299:Yob 1272:-- 1258:Mod 1253:Yob 1216:-- 1164:-- 1130:-- 1080:-- 998:-- 988:Mod 983:Yob 961:-- 907:Mod 902:Yob 843:Mod 838:Yob 751:Mod 746:Yob 678:Mod 673:Yob 620:-- 572:-- 562:Mod 557:Yob 448:or 375:Mod 370:Yob 356:but 228:-- 122:-- 3942:: 3940:}} 3936:{{ 3925:. 3915:83 3913:. 3809:: 3807:}} 3803:{{ 3792:. 3782:83 3780:. 3736:~ 3714:) 3695:~ 3673:) 3638:) 3596:) 3582:) 3508:) 3483:) 3445:) 3424:oi 3396:) 3363:) 3345:) 3318:oi 3295:oi 3276:}} 3270:{{ 3261:) 3145:) 3119:oi 3091:) 3070:) 3023:) 2969:) 2913:) 2884:oi 2836:) 2811:oi 2793:) 2776:) 2709:) 2694:) 2622:oi 2598:) 2590:-- 2533:) 2518:) 2330:) 2293:oi 2274:) 2241:oi 2217:) 2156:oi 2110:) 2092:UK 2076:) 2057:UK 2011:) 2003:-- 1977:) 1950:) 1942:-- 1931:) 1911:oi 1865:) 1850:) 1812:oi 1775:oi 1724:) 1686:oi 1663:) 1641:oi 1623:}} 1617:{{ 1456:, 1430:oi 1365:oi 1324:oi 1282:oi 1226:oi 1195:) 1174:oi 1140:oi 1107:) 1090:oi 1008:oi 971:oi 928:) 872:. 797:. 774:is 717:) 702:) 652:) 630:oi 582:oi 540:) 508:) 494:) 461:) 421:) 393:) 306:) 286:) 271:) 238:oi 211:) 203:-- 192:) 176:) 132:oi 94:→ 64:← 3953:) 3932:. 3921:: 3837:[ 3827:) 3820:) 3799:. 3788:: 3730:~ 3727:~ 3710:( 3689:~ 3686:~ 3669:( 3657:✰ 3649:✰ 3646:- 3634:( 3623:✰ 3615:✰ 3612:- 3592:( 3578:( 3566:✰ 3558:✰ 3555:- 3504:( 3479:( 3441:( 3422:b 3418:e 3392:( 3359:( 3341:( 3316:b 3312:e 3293:b 3289:e 3257:( 3141:( 3117:b 3113:e 3087:( 3066:( 3052:) 3046:( 3019:( 3006:✰ 2998:✰ 2995:- 2965:( 2909:( 2882:b 2878:e 2832:( 2809:b 2805:e 2789:( 2772:( 2705:( 2690:( 2620:b 2616:e 2594:( 2529:( 2514:( 2472:C 2467:/ 2431:C 2426:/ 2405:C 2400:/ 2376:C 2371:/ 2326:( 2291:b 2287:e 2270:( 2239:b 2235:e 2213:( 2194:✰ 2186:✰ 2183:- 2154:b 2150:e 2135:✰ 2127:✰ 2124:- 2106:( 2072:( 2007:( 1973:( 1946:( 1927:( 1909:b 1905:e 1886:✰ 1878:✰ 1875:- 1861:( 1846:( 1810:b 1806:e 1773:b 1769:e 1720:( 1684:b 1680:e 1659:( 1639:b 1635:e 1464:. 1428:b 1424:e 1363:b 1359:e 1322:b 1318:e 1280:b 1276:e 1224:b 1220:e 1191:( 1172:b 1168:e 1138:b 1134:e 1103:( 1088:b 1084:e 1063:/ 1006:b 1002:e 969:b 965:e 924:( 713:( 698:( 648:( 628:b 624:e 580:b 576:e 536:( 504:( 490:( 457:( 417:( 389:( 302:( 282:( 267:( 236:b 232:e 207:( 188:( 172:( 130:b 126:e 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge

talk:WikiProject LGBT studies/Archive 24 - Knowledge

Index